Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

What does a rifle using subsonic ammo sound like? What type of muzzle flash can you expect? Is it so quiet you can't hear it? Here's a video I shot over a year ago when people were saying there was "muzzle flash" from the AGR building in Butler. Spoiler...

paramounttactcl's profile picture

Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

8,353 subscribers

97,360 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk 🚨 Muzzle Flash: Second Shooter Location, Reflection, or Both? This video captures a flash on a window right as Charlie Kirk was shot. Let’s break this down… follow the numbers on the videos. #1. This video shows what appears to be a muzzle flash, just as Charlie is shot, leading people to believe the shooter was to Charlie’s right.. Notate the people to the left of the flash #2. This photo shows the location of the flash. Notate people to the left, on a middle-landing on a staircase. #3. This photo shows a clearer image showing both the middle-landing and the same location of the flash. It is a window. #4 . This video shows the building behind Charlie, which is a long hallway. This debunks any claims the shot came from here. — I zoom in where Charlie was — I zoom in on staircase — I zoom in on the window/flash — I zoom in on where suspected shooter was #5. I notate the flash reflection angles. — Video angle #1 notated — two reflection paths notated in relation to Video angle #1. 1. Reflection angle shows where we were told the shooter was. 2. Reflection angle shows mirrored angle, obviously where there is no reports of a shooter being in. 🔻 Final conclusion: This to me is very likely a muzzle flash reflection from a far off location. I am unsure of the reflection angle however, but this can be 100% proven if someone were to recreate the angles… maybe with a flash camera. If anyone is willing to, or has the means to do this (safely), this will either prove the shot came where the FBI said it came from, or it will prove there was a second shooter, in the direction of the mirrored angle.
0:16

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk 🚨 Muzzle Flash: Second Shooter Location, Reflection, or Both? This video captures a flash on a window right as Charlie Kirk was shot. Let’s break this down… follow the numbers on the videos. #1. This video shows what appears to be a muzzle flash, just as Charlie is shot, leading people to believe the shooter was to Charlie’s right.. Notate the people to the left of the flash #2. This photo shows the location of the flash. Notate people to the left, on a middle-landing on a staircase. #3. This photo shows a clearer image showing both the middle-landing and the same location of the flash. It is a window. #4 . This video shows the building behind Charlie, which is a long hallway. This debunks any claims the shot came from here. — I zoom in where Charlie was — I zoom in on staircase — I zoom in on the window/flash — I zoom in on where suspected shooter was #5. I notate the flash reflection angles. — Video angle #1 notated — two reflection paths notated in relation to Video angle #1. 1. Reflection angle shows where we were told the shooter was. 2. Reflection angle shows mirrored angle, obviously where there is no reports of a shooter being in. 🔻 Final conclusion: This to me is very likely a muzzle flash reflection from a far off location. I am unsure of the reflection angle however, but this can be 100% proven if someone were to recreate the angles… maybe with a flash camera. If anyone is willing to, or has the means to do this (safely), this will either prove the shot came where the FBI said it came from, or it will prove there was a second shooter, in the direction of the mirrored angle.

MJTruthUltra

10,664,340 views • 9 months ago

Nick Sortor Here it is in slow motion I'm not seeing a muzzle flash either. Wish we had all 17 seconds of the video here. If muzzle flash before this, then fuse, Deadman switch, and timer are on the table.
0:27

Nick Sortor Here it is in slow motion I'm not seeing a muzzle flash either. Wish we had all 17 seconds of the video here. If muzzle flash before this, then fuse, Deadman switch, and timer are on the table.

Brick Suit

416,042 views • 1 year ago

which muzzle device will perform the best at eliminating flash
0:38

which muzzle device will perform the best at eliminating flash

Garand Thumb

86,235 views • 1 year ago

🚨EXCLUSIVE: New Photos Show Mystery Figure on the Roof Before Charlie Kirk Was Shot —Did We Just Spot the REAL Shooter? You have to see this. Photos show someone (or something) on the roof near the stairwell before Charlie Kirk was shot — and gone after. If this can be corroborated with other known video footage this could be the most important lead yet. Here’s what’s wild: The roof location in these pics lines up with the area we all believe the shot came from. That makes this evidence potentially huge. But there’s a sticking point: we also have a clear muzzle flash in the alcove next to the stairwell in other footage. If the person on the roof is the shooter, that muzzle flash doesn’t fit the timeline — so either the what's seen on video is not a muzzle flash, or there could be more than one shooter. Bottom line: this raises more questions than it answers — and that’s exactly why we need full transparency. If you care about the truth, here’s what we need now: Timestamped originals of these roof photos and any adjacent video from that day. This could confirm the shooter’s position — or expose inconsistencies in the timeline that demand a full review. Don’t jump to conclusions; let's look at all angles and demand a full investigation. Share this if you want the footage released and the truth revealed. 👀🔎
0:31

🚨EXCLUSIVE: New Photos Show Mystery Figure on the Roof Before Charlie Kirk Was Shot —Did We Just Spot the REAL Shooter? You have to see this. Photos show someone (or something) on the roof near the stairwell before Charlie Kirk was shot — and gone after. If this can be corroborated with other known video footage this could be the most important lead yet. Here’s what’s wild: The roof location in these pics lines up with the area we all believe the shot came from. That makes this evidence potentially huge. But there’s a sticking point: we also have a clear muzzle flash in the alcove next to the stairwell in other footage. If the person on the roof is the shooter, that muzzle flash doesn’t fit the timeline — so either the what's seen on video is not a muzzle flash, or there could be more than one shooter. Bottom line: this raises more questions than it answers — and that’s exactly why we need full transparency. If you care about the truth, here’s what we need now: Timestamped originals of these roof photos and any adjacent video from that day. This could confirm the shooter’s position — or expose inconsistencies in the timeline that demand a full review. Don’t jump to conclusions; let's look at all angles and demand a full investigation. Share this if you want the footage released and the truth revealed. 👀🔎

Project Constitution

296,671 views • 9 months ago

New Details on the Cybertruck explosion and the video i was analyzing WAS Modified in a very specific way. Did CNN delete the muzzle flash? Why is the video from CNN so different than the video shown today by the Sheriff? Why is everything so weird with this case??
6:15

New Details on the Cybertruck explosion and the video i was analyzing WAS Modified in a very specific way. Did CNN delete the muzzle flash? Why is the video from CNN so different than the video shown today by the Sheriff? Why is everything so weird with this case??

ProPixel Video Analysis and Research

14,880 views • 1 year ago

The muzzle flash on that thing is unreal! Local gunsmiths in Pakistan are basically like: 'Does it look wild? Yes. Does it shoot? Also yes. Good enough!'
0:25

The muzzle flash on that thing is unreal! Local gunsmiths in Pakistan are basically like: 'Does it look wild? Yes. Does it shoot? Also yes. Good enough!'

Gun Lovers Club

106,794 views • 9 days ago

Kenji, the baby Mooseweiler, is learning to be comfortable with a muzzle. He isn't aggressive or likely to bite someone, so why do we do this? Emergency preparedness. If he's ever seriously injured the vet clinic will likely muzzle him as soon as they take him into the back. Even the gentlest of dogs with the best temperaments might become fearful and bite if they are in pain and someone tries to exam their injury. Especially if it's a stranger or they already have negative feelings about vet clinics. Even something as straightforward as a torn nail can be painful enough that a muzzle is used. Putting the muzzle on allows the veterinary team to quickly and safely examine the dog, perform first aid, or start an IV for sedation if needed. If a dog has never worn a muzzle, it can add to the stress and fear they are already experiencing from being restrained and examined while being in pain, especially if they try to resist having it put on. It's much easier on the dog and the veterinary team if the dog is comfortable with wearing a muzzle. If the dog has had a lot of positive conditioning with the muzzle it can actually help calm them as it's something familiar with good emotions attached. Anytime I can help my dogs avoid unnecessary stress, I'll do it. Muzzle training is one way and it helps ensure we're prepared for emergencies. Often when someone sees a dog wearing a muzzle, they assume the dog is aggressive. That's often not the case. It could simply be wearing it during training to get comfortable with it or it might be a dog that eats things off the ground. It could also be a responsible owner of a fearful dog that might snap if an unleashed dog rudely runs up. A muzzle doesn't mean a dog is bad. It's often the sign of a good dog owner. #XDogs #PuppyTraining #Muzzles 🎥 Kenji learning to voluntarily put his head into a muzzle
0:26

Kenji, the baby Mooseweiler, is learning to be comfortable with a muzzle. He isn't aggressive or likely to bite someone, so why do we do this? Emergency preparedness. If he's ever seriously injured the vet clinic will likely muzzle him as soon as they take him into the back. Even the gentlest of dogs with the best temperaments might become fearful and bite if they are in pain and someone tries to exam their injury. Especially if it's a stranger or they already have negative feelings about vet clinics. Even something as straightforward as a torn nail can be painful enough that a muzzle is used. Putting the muzzle on allows the veterinary team to quickly and safely examine the dog, perform first aid, or start an IV for sedation if needed. If a dog has never worn a muzzle, it can add to the stress and fear they are already experiencing from being restrained and examined while being in pain, especially if they try to resist having it put on. It's much easier on the dog and the veterinary team if the dog is comfortable with wearing a muzzle. If the dog has had a lot of positive conditioning with the muzzle it can actually help calm them as it's something familiar with good emotions attached. Anytime I can help my dogs avoid unnecessary stress, I'll do it. Muzzle training is one way and it helps ensure we're prepared for emergencies. Often when someone sees a dog wearing a muzzle, they assume the dog is aggressive. That's often not the case. It could simply be wearing it during training to get comfortable with it or it might be a dog that eats things off the ground. It could also be a responsible owner of a fearful dog that might snap if an unleashed dog rudely runs up. A muzzle doesn't mean a dog is bad. It's often the sign of a good dog owner. #XDogs #PuppyTraining #Muzzles 🎥 Kenji learning to voluntarily put his head into a muzzle

Team Servicerottie🇨🇦🐕‍🦺🦽

13,440 views • 27 days ago

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Blood Spatter, Earpiece, or Necklace? This video is going viral from someone named RangeDayBro on YouTube, saying this is 100% evidence Charlie was shot in the head, BUT… it’s kinda wrong. I was the original person to point out that something looked like it hit Charlies right side of his head when it happened… when I first started looking, I thought the exact same thing he did about the “Blood Splatter”. But I kept slowing down the video, and discovered what appears to be an earpiece or necklace. He also gets the “FLASH” wrong, 100% wrong. Stating that’s where the shooter was.. then said he was hiding in the bush. After combing through video footage, I found what I believe to be 100% the muzzle flash. The shot did not and could not have come from that location because it’s merely the top window panel of the interior hall of flags (I think that’s what it’s called.) The muzzle flash was 100% a reflection off that glass panel from a far off distance, notably in the same general direction they said the shooter was. (See post below) Conclusion: Now, I’m not saying he couldn’t have been shot from anywhere else.. nor in any direction. In fact, I don’t buy the story at all that his neck bones stopped that bullet. As we saw that day, there were several distractions, which I feel played a significant role to allow the real people to get away. I’m only saying his suggestion about the “blood spatter” is just his earpiece or most likely a necklace... It’s important to be accurate and process eliminate these things. Maybe Turning Point USA can confirm if in fact his necklace did pop off, it could settle some of these “theories”. All we want is the truth.
8:41

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Blood Spatter, Earpiece, or Necklace? This video is going viral from someone named RangeDayBro on YouTube, saying this is 100% evidence Charlie was shot in the head, BUT… it’s kinda wrong. I was the original person to point out that something looked like it hit Charlies right side of his head when it happened… when I first started looking, I thought the exact same thing he did about the “Blood Splatter”. But I kept slowing down the video, and discovered what appears to be an earpiece or necklace. He also gets the “FLASH” wrong, 100% wrong. Stating that’s where the shooter was.. then said he was hiding in the bush. After combing through video footage, I found what I believe to be 100% the muzzle flash. The shot did not and could not have come from that location because it’s merely the top window panel of the interior hall of flags (I think that’s what it’s called.) The muzzle flash was 100% a reflection off that glass panel from a far off distance, notably in the same general direction they said the shooter was. (See post below) Conclusion: Now, I’m not saying he couldn’t have been shot from anywhere else.. nor in any direction. In fact, I don’t buy the story at all that his neck bones stopped that bullet. As we saw that day, there were several distractions, which I feel played a significant role to allow the real people to get away. I’m only saying his suggestion about the “blood spatter” is just his earpiece or most likely a necklace... It’s important to be accurate and process eliminate these things. Maybe Turning Point USA can confirm if in fact his necklace did pop off, it could settle some of these “theories”. All we want is the truth.

MJTruthUltra

237,534 views • 9 months ago

Hey friends!. Here is a small clip of Brother Leon's integration with the Necron base. The muzzle flash effect is from @deadlyprintstudio, and the ornamented arm from greytidestudio #warhammer40k #warhammer #gamesworkshop #warhammercommunity #paintingwarhammer
0:59

Hey friends!. Here is a small clip of Brother Leon's integration with the Necron base. The muzzle flash effect is from @deadlyprintstudio, and the ornamented arm from greytidestudio #warhammer40k #warhammer #gamesworkshop #warhammercommunity #paintingwarhammer

Juan Sanz Elminiaturista

17,261 views • 1 year ago

What if we could RECREATE the REFLECTION of the FLASH seen in the GLASS during the Charlie Kirk assassination? Literally recreate it on site. The timing of the flash seen in the reflection of the glass is what makes it so interesting. What else would cause a flash that bright in the middle of the day? This could at least determine a lot of good information and confirm or deny theories that are out there. Just to get an idea of where the FLASH came from, which could identify a possible shooter or 2nd shooter location. The reason I say this is because it lines up perfectly with the sound of the gun, meaning you see the flash first, then you hear the shot, which would make sense because light travels faster than sound. This way we could get an idea of where it came from in the first place and determine if it's a good lead or not and then check the crowd or building locations. It could be recreated with a camera flash or something with bright enough lumens. This could clear up at least one theory or confirm it and lead us in the right direction of where the shooter could have been. Please comment with your thoughts and ideas. We need to get someone out there to the location with the Proper equipment. At least we could confirm or deny some theories. Video in bottom left shows the flash.
0:52

What if we could RECREATE the REFLECTION of the FLASH seen in the GLASS during the Charlie Kirk assassination? Literally recreate it on site. The timing of the flash seen in the reflection of the glass is what makes it so interesting. What else would cause a flash that bright in the middle of the day? This could at least determine a lot of good information and confirm or deny theories that are out there. Just to get an idea of where the FLASH came from, which could identify a possible shooter or 2nd shooter location. The reason I say this is because it lines up perfectly with the sound of the gun, meaning you see the flash first, then you hear the shot, which would make sense because light travels faster than sound. This way we could get an idea of where it came from in the first place and determine if it's a good lead or not and then check the crowd or building locations. It could be recreated with a camera flash or something with bright enough lumens. This could clear up at least one theory or confirm it and lead us in the right direction of where the shooter could have been. Please comment with your thoughts and ideas. We need to get someone out there to the location with the Proper equipment. At least we could confirm or deny some theories. Video in bottom left shows the flash.

The SCIF

108,760 views • 9 months ago

Im surprised no one uses the Ladra considering It has a faster TTK than the LC10 out to 25m. It has more muzzle flash, but a lot of people are using tracer bundles on their LC10 anyway.
0:27

Im surprised no one uses the Ladra considering It has a faster TTK than the LC10 out to 25m. It has more muzzle flash, but a lot of people are using tracer bundles on their LC10 anyway.

𝙂𝙤𝙙𝙧𝙞𝙘

16,656 views • 11 months ago

People rightfully criticize 4Kids for censorship in Sonic X but there was one time where they accidentally made it better IMO. The sudden cut to Schmitz's face is way stronger than the original cartoony muzzle flash.
0:37

People rightfully criticize 4Kids for censorship in Sonic X but there was one time where they accidentally made it better IMO. The sudden cut to Schmitz's face is way stronger than the original cartoony muzzle flash.

Jehtt

1,350,940 views • 2 years ago

I quickly examined Damage Prediction Note this is based on a very small sample size from a casual server, results might be different for you, so I suggest doing your own testing When turned on, results for me show how the headshot effect/spark aligns with the muzzle flash now
1:02

I quickly examined Damage Prediction Note this is based on a very small sample size from a casual server, results might be different for you, so I suggest doing your own testing When turned on, results for me show how the headshot effect/spark aligns with the muzzle flash now

Maxim

118,957 views • 1 year ago

Why are so few people talking about all the suppressed gunfire? There is a shooter in the window, directly below the rooftop shooter. (You don't see the muzzle flash?) Isn't that relevant? Rep. Eli Crane 🗃 Byron Donalds Cory Mills Donald Trump Jr. Joe Rogan Tucker Carlson
2:14

Why are so few people talking about all the suppressed gunfire? There is a shooter in the window, directly below the rooftop shooter. (You don't see the muzzle flash?) Isn't that relevant? Rep. Eli Crane 🗃 Byron Donalds Cory Mills Donald Trump Jr. Joe Rogan Tucker Carlson

John Cullen 🐓

337,592 views • 1 year ago

The gyroscopic muzzle brake reduces muzzle rise during long strings of fire and in super slow motion you can see the affect it has on barrel harmonics. Almost completely eliminating barrel whip.
0:23

The gyroscopic muzzle brake reduces muzzle rise during long strings of fire and in super slow motion you can see the affect it has on barrel harmonics. Almost completely eliminating barrel whip.

Gun Junkie

115,208 views • 1 month ago

Introducing: Dolphin Muzzle! He will show up at your window, and you will have to flash him away with the flashlight as he goes to different positions. #fullstoppunctuation
0:20

Introducing: Dolphin Muzzle! He will show up at your window, and you will have to flash him away with the flashlight as he goes to different positions. #fullstoppunctuation

torturing vibingleaf with jack walten

21,613 views • 1 month ago

GUN SHOT FLASH caught behind blue tent behind Charlie on VIDEO and the SOUND of a 2ND GUN SHOT captured on audio. Does this PROVE the 2ND SHOOTER theory? You have to see this. This could be a huge breakthrough. You can actual see the gun shot flash coming out of a barrel of some sort from BEHIND Charlie's tent. Right after the FIRST shot is seen and caught on video, when you slow down the footage, you can actually hear TWO SEPERATE GUN SHOTS. There is ANOTHER gun shot right after the FIRST one, which the SOUND of it is caught on the camera's audio. You can't deny that this is the FLASH of a gun shot seen clearly on video coming from behind that blue tent. This needs to be absolutely confirmed because this could be a huge break through confirming a potential location of one shooter behind the blue tent and confirming the existence of a 2nd SHOOTER somewhere else. I want to hear feedback, what do you think? cc: Project Constitution
0:51

GUN SHOT FLASH caught behind blue tent behind Charlie on VIDEO and the SOUND of a 2ND GUN SHOT captured on audio. Does this PROVE the 2ND SHOOTER theory? You have to see this. This could be a huge breakthrough. You can actual see the gun shot flash coming out of a barrel of some sort from BEHIND Charlie's tent. Right after the FIRST shot is seen and caught on video, when you slow down the footage, you can actually hear TWO SEPERATE GUN SHOTS. There is ANOTHER gun shot right after the FIRST one, which the SOUND of it is caught on the camera's audio. You can't deny that this is the FLASH of a gun shot seen clearly on video coming from behind that blue tent. This needs to be absolutely confirmed because this could be a huge break through confirming a potential location of one shooter behind the blue tent and confirming the existence of a 2nd SHOOTER somewhere else. I want to hear feedback, what do you think? cc: Project Constitution

The SCIF

32,169 views • 8 months ago

#Flash #Boom This shows what it was. This is not my video. It was shared on a community post. #SoundOn
0:24

#Flash #Boom This shows what it was. This is not my video. It was shared on a community post. #SoundOn

SLCScanner

220,202 views • 3 years ago

"You go in and you want to kill another human being. I just had a craving — I wanted to legally k*ll somebody that was a bad guy. All of a sudden, I’m walking and I step on something big. I draw down, start mule kicking, and realize it’s a dude. Then I see muzzle flash right in front of us, call contact front, and engage. Seconds later, I hear ‘cease fire’ and ‘man down,’ and immediately I had the sensation that I was the guy who had shot them." David Rutherford
6:21

Sensitive content

"You go in and you want to kill another human being. I just had a craving — I wanted to legally k*ll somebody that was a bad guy. All of a sudden, I’m walking and I step on something big. I draw down, start mule kicking, and realize it’s a dude. Then I see muzzle flash right in front of us, call contact front, and engage. Seconds later, I hear ‘cease fire’ and ‘man down,’ and immediately I had the sensation that I was the guy who had shot them." David Rutherford

Shawn Ryan Show

77,645 views • 10 months ago

CHARLIE KIRK BREAKTHROUGH? "SECOND SHOOTER" MUZZLE FLASH CAUGHT ON VIDEO? WATCH CAREFULLY: A split second before the crack of the gunshot, a distinct ball of faint light can be seen darting through the tree in front of the Sorensen Center. If it is indeed the muzzle flash, then that puts the kill shot being fired from the roof of the Sorensen Center. Such a trajectory better matches the analysis of Charlie Kirk's wound arrived at independently by both Chris Martenson & Baron Coleman (YouTube, H/T: Baron's eagle eyes). At the end of the video, I've included a rough layout analysis of the locations & trajectories. In the next tweet below, I'll link the source video.
2:14

CHARLIE KIRK BREAKTHROUGH? "SECOND SHOOTER" MUZZLE FLASH CAUGHT ON VIDEO? WATCH CAREFULLY: A split second before the crack of the gunshot, a distinct ball of faint light can be seen darting through the tree in front of the Sorensen Center. If it is indeed the muzzle flash, then that puts the kill shot being fired from the roof of the Sorensen Center. Such a trajectory better matches the analysis of Charlie Kirk's wound arrived at independently by both Chris Martenson & Baron Coleman (YouTube, H/T: Baron's eagle eyes). At the end of the video, I've included a rough layout analysis of the locations & trajectories. In the next tweet below, I'll link the source video.

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

209,603 views • 8 months ago