Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

What does everyone love most about prolapses? Write in the comments below 🌹 👇 my website : #anal #fisting #gape #prolapse #dildo #porn #sexy #plug #analplug #teen #amateur #huge #ass #pussy #extremeinsertions #porn #fist #slut #soloanal #ruinedhole

Lena1_2_4's profile picture

Lena🍥

21,942 subscribers

262,057 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#anal#fisting#gape#prolapse#dildo#porn#sexy#plug#analplug#teen#amateur#huge#ass#pussy#extremeinsertions#porn#fist#slut#soloanal#ruinedhole
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

As a young man, I was partially feminized and chemically castrated. My first adult relationship was with a man who deceived me about his age. I believed he was perhaps 15 years older, but in truth, he was over 20 years my senior. I was a homeless autistic epileptic teen, jumping from place to place, desperate for stability and a Home. He lured me in with promises of safety and shelter, whispers of love. He manipulated me, exploited my devotion, and groomed me into selling my body, convincing me that my only worth lay in my body. That I had to sell myself to make more because my disability check was not enough. My love my labor in the home was not enough. He physically abused me, breaking my teeth, and sold me to other men. He put me on camera and took everything, I earned not a single penny. Nearly a year after I escaped him, he was arrested for possessing child pornography. I saw the warrant myself in his ransacked home. Horrified I walked out and closed that memory in a box and tried to never think about him again. It wasn’t until I was 33 when I was reading reduxx, and learning what gamps were, deep in my studies on sexology that I came to the painful realization that his attraction to me stemmed from my youthful, childlike appearance and his predatory nature as a pedophile. That he was a gamp/pedo fetishist and transition itself had put me in his path. In that moment I painted my life with black brush, and I was forever changed. Genevieve Gluck is based, It is not just AGP fueling Trans, it is the men escalated into porn addiction who have become so desensitized to healthy sex that they develop a fascination for the abnormal. Porn hub has openly admitted to injecting shemale porn into the feeds of its most frequent users hoping that they will develop this fetish and become more diversified in the porn they consume. Epstein Island lives as a permanent historical example that Pedophilia and GAMP (Gyne-Andro-Morphophilia) often run hand in hand. These perversions exist in men at all levels of power and they are a motivating factor for preserving the human experimentation done under transgenderism. A lot of the clean cut, smiling normal looking men in power who support trans could be just like my ex. Autogynephiles Mass Reported me for this post. Talking about this got me blackmailed and stalked, harassed for over a year. I will never shut up, This pain is carved into my body and mind.
5:14

As a young man, I was partially feminized and chemically castrated. My first adult relationship was with a man who deceived me about his age. I believed he was perhaps 15 years older, but in truth, he was over 20 years my senior. I was a homeless autistic epileptic teen, jumping from place to place, desperate for stability and a Home. He lured me in with promises of safety and shelter, whispers of love. He manipulated me, exploited my devotion, and groomed me into selling my body, convincing me that my only worth lay in my body. That I had to sell myself to make more because my disability check was not enough. My love my labor in the home was not enough. He physically abused me, breaking my teeth, and sold me to other men. He put me on camera and took everything, I earned not a single penny. Nearly a year after I escaped him, he was arrested for possessing child pornography. I saw the warrant myself in his ransacked home. Horrified I walked out and closed that memory in a box and tried to never think about him again. It wasn’t until I was 33 when I was reading reduxx, and learning what gamps were, deep in my studies on sexology that I came to the painful realization that his attraction to me stemmed from my youthful, childlike appearance and his predatory nature as a pedophile. That he was a gamp/pedo fetishist and transition itself had put me in his path. In that moment I painted my life with black brush, and I was forever changed. Genevieve Gluck is based, It is not just AGP fueling Trans, it is the men escalated into porn addiction who have become so desensitized to healthy sex that they develop a fascination for the abnormal. Porn hub has openly admitted to injecting shemale porn into the feeds of its most frequent users hoping that they will develop this fetish and become more diversified in the porn they consume. Epstein Island lives as a permanent historical example that Pedophilia and GAMP (Gyne-Andro-Morphophilia) often run hand in hand. These perversions exist in men at all levels of power and they are a motivating factor for preserving the human experimentation done under transgenderism. A lot of the clean cut, smiling normal looking men in power who support trans could be just like my ex. Autogynephiles Mass Reported me for this post. Talking about this got me blackmailed and stalked, harassed for over a year. I will never shut up, This pain is carved into my body and mind.

The Transphobic Historian

41,658 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Men Who Enjoy Sharing Some men love sharing their wives with other men. This is something I’ve noticed in my work with couples that surprises a lot of people. There are way more men than you’d expect who get genuinely turned on by the idea of their partner being with someone else — what some people call hotwifing or even cuckolding. At first it sounds wild, right? But when you dig into the psychology, it starts to make a strange kind of sense. For a lot of guys, it’s not about feeling inadequate or wanting humiliation. It’s often this powerful mix of pride and trust. Watching or knowing their partner is desired by someone else can feel like the ultimate compliment — like “she’s so sexy that other people want her, and she still chooses me.” There’s also this intense erotic charge that comes from breaking a really deep cultural taboo around possession and jealousy. It taps into something primal too — that sperm competition instinct (which is a real thing by the way) gets mixed with the thrill of seeing your partner fully in her pleasure. And at the core of it all is an incredible level of emotional safety. You can’t even entertain the fantasy unless you feel rock-solid in the relationship. What fascinates me most is how it flips the usual script about what makes intimacy “safe.” For some couples, leaning into this fantasy actually brings them closer because it requires radical honesty and communication most relationships never touch. Of course it’s not for everyone, and it only works when both people are genuinely into it. But I’ve seen it become a really freeing, exciting chapter for couples who explore it thoughtfully. Have you ever come across this fantasy in your OWN relationship or heard about it from friends? Does it intrigue you, scare you, or just make you curious? Have you done it? Would you do it? Drop your honest thoughts in the comments. Let’s hear them!
3:43

Sensitive content

Men Who Enjoy Sharing Some men love sharing their wives with other men. This is something I’ve noticed in my work with couples that surprises a lot of people. There are way more men than you’d expect who get genuinely turned on by the idea of their partner being with someone else — what some people call hotwifing or even cuckolding. At first it sounds wild, right? But when you dig into the psychology, it starts to make a strange kind of sense. For a lot of guys, it’s not about feeling inadequate or wanting humiliation. It’s often this powerful mix of pride and trust. Watching or knowing their partner is desired by someone else can feel like the ultimate compliment — like “she’s so sexy that other people want her, and she still chooses me.” There’s also this intense erotic charge that comes from breaking a really deep cultural taboo around possession and jealousy. It taps into something primal too — that sperm competition instinct (which is a real thing by the way) gets mixed with the thrill of seeing your partner fully in her pleasure. And at the core of it all is an incredible level of emotional safety. You can’t even entertain the fantasy unless you feel rock-solid in the relationship. What fascinates me most is how it flips the usual script about what makes intimacy “safe.” For some couples, leaning into this fantasy actually brings them closer because it requires radical honesty and communication most relationships never touch. Of course it’s not for everyone, and it only works when both people are genuinely into it. But I’ve seen it become a really freeing, exciting chapter for couples who explore it thoughtfully. Have you ever come across this fantasy in your OWN relationship or heard about it from friends? Does it intrigue you, scare you, or just make you curious? Have you done it? Would you do it? Drop your honest thoughts in the comments. Let’s hear them!

Kate Shelor

570,320 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Is writing quality subjective or objective? Of course, taste is personal and writers hate rules, but the more you read, the more you see the same patterns everywhere. Michael Dean has scored 100s of essays on 27 different metrics. He says we can use AI not to automate writing, but to elevate it. Here’s what we talked about: 1) You can’t develop good taste without knowing the fundamentals of your genre. These 27 patterns across all essays are not rules, but questions. Once you understand the constraints, you can break them creatively. 2) The best way to get good at writing is to change how you read. Don’t just read for content. Highlight the parts that resonate, and then deconstruct the voice and structure. 3) Storytelling is about stretching the unknown across time. 4) Great titles do triple duty: they create mystery, distill your thesis, and use phonetics that roll off the tongue. 'Pride and Prejudice' succeeds on all counts, while 'English Aristocracy' falls flat. 5) Get feedback by asking readers what they love and hate. Everyone knows to rework the parts people hate, but don't forget about the other invisible enemy: boredom. Beware of the parts people are indifferent to. Forgettable sections are the enemy of good writing, and no reaction is a bad reaction. 6) The ultimate goal of writing advice is to forget it. Good practice brings you fluency. People romanticize the Grateful Dead as an emblem of free-spirited intuition, but nobody talks about their insane work ethic. Young Jerry Garcia practiced banjo scales for 10 hours a day. Phil Lesh studied classical music theory for trumpet. They kicked out Bob Weir for not being rigorous enough and he had to work his way back into the band. By going into your head, you can get out of your head. 7) A good hook is a fractal. A hook isn’t just a clever way to intrigue a reader, it should capture the core dilemma of your essay. Understand the questions your writing answers, and then bake those questions into the subtext of your opening. 8) Personal writing involves the biographical details of your life. Could somebody put their name on your essay and get away with it? If so, you’re not on the page. 9) Personal writing has 3 criteria: biography (what happened), interiority (what you thought), and outlook (what you believe). It’s not about pushing these to their extremes, but having them work together to support your main idea. 10) To find your voice, change your arena. The way we shape language is linked to our environment. You’ll speak differently to a 5,000-person audience than to your five best friends. You’re more likely to experiment when the stakes and visibility are low. Consider an unlisted page on your website. Or consider a pseudonym (Fernando Pessoa had 75 of them). 11) Write about less: A student once asked Umberto Eco for advice about how to write a thesis. He wanted to write about all the volcanoes in the world. Eco told him to narrow it down. How about all the active volcanoes in the world? Nope, there are 48 of them. Get more specific. “Okay, how about the Popocatépetl Volcano in Mexico?” Okay, that works. Pick one volcano and focus on that. 12) We should prepare for AI to get better than we can imagine. If AI gets “extraterrestrially good,” becomes hyper relevant, and can replicate us to uncanny degrees—will you still write your own sentences? If the answer is yes, you don’t need to panic every time a new model comes out. By imagining the extremes, it helps you understand the timeless parts of the practice. 13) AI's ability to help you write is constrained by how much information you give it. Michael says: “The more you write, the more personal and aligned the replica can be.” 14) Write your first draft for yourself, and write your second draft for your reader. 15) Paragraphs are the atomic unit of composition. We are traumatized by The Five Paragraph Essay and need better heuristics. Each paragraph can start with a frame to hook the reader and end with a reward. Do it over and over again, and you'll get a Reader's Trance. 16) By learning to write essays, you become a Writing Generalist. Most genres specialize, but the essay is a medium of fusion. It combines the soul of a memoirist, the rigor of a philosopher, the pen of a poet, the persuasion of a marketer, the research of a journalist, and the creativity of a novelist. I've shared the full conversation with Michael Dean below. Of course, you can watch it here, but if you'd like to watch it on YouTube or listen on Apple or Spotify, I've shared those links below.
1:51:30

Is writing quality subjective or objective? Of course, taste is personal and writers hate rules, but the more you read, the more you see the same patterns everywhere. Michael Dean has scored 100s of essays on 27 different metrics. He says we can use AI not to automate writing, but to elevate it. Here’s what we talked about: 1) You can’t develop good taste without knowing the fundamentals of your genre. These 27 patterns across all essays are not rules, but questions. Once you understand the constraints, you can break them creatively. 2) The best way to get good at writing is to change how you read. Don’t just read for content. Highlight the parts that resonate, and then deconstruct the voice and structure. 3) Storytelling is about stretching the unknown across time. 4) Great titles do triple duty: they create mystery, distill your thesis, and use phonetics that roll off the tongue. 'Pride and Prejudice' succeeds on all counts, while 'English Aristocracy' falls flat. 5) Get feedback by asking readers what they love and hate. Everyone knows to rework the parts people hate, but don't forget about the other invisible enemy: boredom. Beware of the parts people are indifferent to. Forgettable sections are the enemy of good writing, and no reaction is a bad reaction. 6) The ultimate goal of writing advice is to forget it. Good practice brings you fluency. People romanticize the Grateful Dead as an emblem of free-spirited intuition, but nobody talks about their insane work ethic. Young Jerry Garcia practiced banjo scales for 10 hours a day. Phil Lesh studied classical music theory for trumpet. They kicked out Bob Weir for not being rigorous enough and he had to work his way back into the band. By going into your head, you can get out of your head. 7) A good hook is a fractal. A hook isn’t just a clever way to intrigue a reader, it should capture the core dilemma of your essay. Understand the questions your writing answers, and then bake those questions into the subtext of your opening. 8) Personal writing involves the biographical details of your life. Could somebody put their name on your essay and get away with it? If so, you’re not on the page. 9) Personal writing has 3 criteria: biography (what happened), interiority (what you thought), and outlook (what you believe). It’s not about pushing these to their extremes, but having them work together to support your main idea. 10) To find your voice, change your arena. The way we shape language is linked to our environment. You’ll speak differently to a 5,000-person audience than to your five best friends. You’re more likely to experiment when the stakes and visibility are low. Consider an unlisted page on your website. Or consider a pseudonym (Fernando Pessoa had 75 of them). 11) Write about less: A student once asked Umberto Eco for advice about how to write a thesis. He wanted to write about all the volcanoes in the world. Eco told him to narrow it down. How about all the active volcanoes in the world? Nope, there are 48 of them. Get more specific. “Okay, how about the Popocatépetl Volcano in Mexico?” Okay, that works. Pick one volcano and focus on that. 12) We should prepare for AI to get better than we can imagine. If AI gets “extraterrestrially good,” becomes hyper relevant, and can replicate us to uncanny degrees—will you still write your own sentences? If the answer is yes, you don’t need to panic every time a new model comes out. By imagining the extremes, it helps you understand the timeless parts of the practice. 13) AI's ability to help you write is constrained by how much information you give it. Michael says: “The more you write, the more personal and aligned the replica can be.” 14) Write your first draft for yourself, and write your second draft for your reader. 15) Paragraphs are the atomic unit of composition. We are traumatized by The Five Paragraph Essay and need better heuristics. Each paragraph can start with a frame to hook the reader and end with a reward. Do it over and over again, and you'll get a Reader's Trance. 16) By learning to write essays, you become a Writing Generalist. Most genres specialize, but the essay is a medium of fusion. It combines the soul of a memoirist, the rigor of a philosopher, the pen of a poet, the persuasion of a marketer, the research of a journalist, and the creativity of a novelist. I've shared the full conversation with Michael Dean below. Of course, you can watch it here, but if you'd like to watch it on YouTube or listen on Apple or Spotify, I've shared those links below.

David Perell

90,841 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

$100k a month from "gifts" 🤯 PinkyDoll is making over 6 figures a month on TikTok pretending to be an NPC. Why on earth does this work? - It's immediately recognisable, - We like sounds, and - We loooove instant gratification. 1️⃣ It's almost meme-like. We see it and we immediately relate to it. Whether you consciously know what she's doing or not, your brain has seen this before if you've played games in the past. The 🧠 IT KNOWS! 2️⃣ Short sounds are everywhere. Most primitive, they're in our language as we make syllables but they also make up a lot of our common expressions like oh, ah, uh huh, yuk, etc... However, short sounds are everywhere online, in the devices we use and even real life! Like in games when going up levels or receiving a new item. Mobile phones with haptic sounds, notifications, the battery is charging. Or even the toaster when that glorious "pop" is heard. Add to that... 3️⃣ The instant gratification and you know the dopamine hit is real! People send these "gifts" and an action and sound are produced. I'm not into TikTok so I had no idea about "gifts" until now, but my guess is these gifts/rewards are mostly used as a "thank you" in the platform... Like a donation or a "buy a coffee" to a creator you like. However, with PinkyDoll, you get "more" You get a specific action and sound instantly on her lives which (some) people simply love. Another thing is anticipation. Anticipation and not knowing what sound/reaction is coming can also be extremely addictive! So whether you vibe with it or not... Don't hate the player, hate the game. Gang gang. Prrr prrr What do think? And why else do you think this works? 🤔 Let me know in the comments 👇
1:32

$100k a month from "gifts" 🤯 PinkyDoll is making over 6 figures a month on TikTok pretending to be an NPC. Why on earth does this work? - It's immediately recognisable, - We like sounds, and - We loooove instant gratification. 1️⃣ It's almost meme-like. We see it and we immediately relate to it. Whether you consciously know what she's doing or not, your brain has seen this before if you've played games in the past. The 🧠 IT KNOWS! 2️⃣ Short sounds are everywhere. Most primitive, they're in our language as we make syllables but they also make up a lot of our common expressions like oh, ah, uh huh, yuk, etc... However, short sounds are everywhere online, in the devices we use and even real life! Like in games when going up levels or receiving a new item. Mobile phones with haptic sounds, notifications, the battery is charging. Or even the toaster when that glorious "pop" is heard. Add to that... 3️⃣ The instant gratification and you know the dopamine hit is real! People send these "gifts" and an action and sound are produced. I'm not into TikTok so I had no idea about "gifts" until now, but my guess is these gifts/rewards are mostly used as a "thank you" in the platform... Like a donation or a "buy a coffee" to a creator you like. However, with PinkyDoll, you get "more" You get a specific action and sound instantly on her lives which (some) people simply love. Another thing is anticipation. Anticipation and not knowing what sound/reaction is coming can also be extremely addictive! So whether you vibe with it or not... Don't hate the player, hate the game. Gang gang. Prrr prrr What do think? And why else do you think this works? 🤔 Let me know in the comments 👇

Greg

35,295 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

THEORY: Did Fanatics’ launch of stitched NFL jerseys for 30 teams reveal 2 teams planning new uniform redesigns in 2027? Connecting the drop with facts & rumors about why the Saints & Dolphins *could* be working on new primary uniforms! 🎥👇 I transcribed my video below, but the key points to consider: - I’m not reporting a redesign, but those I could reach today said my theory makes sense - Prior to this, there was already enough signs & smoke around the Dolphins & Saints considering new uniforms - The 2026 season has been locked since before the 2025 season, this is for 2027 - No one made a mistake, this is just a product of the long uniform process TRANSCRIPT (for those who like to read 😉): I think I might have uncovered something pretty big. You might know I love talking about jerseys, uniforms, sports design, especially in football. And occasionally, I like to report a little news, break some news I find out. Well, yesterday, Fanatics officially announced what I reported back in October, that they're bringing back stitched jerseys for NFL jerseys. But I didn't get excited and start connecting some dots until I noticed that they didn't drop the stitched jerseys for every NFL team. There are two missing. And it got me thinking about everything I've ever reported and said, all my videos I've ever made, and it specifically brought me to three key facts. Fact 1: teams work on new uniform designs for multiple years. My talks and videos with the Falcons and Ravens confirm this. The reason for this, among many reasons, they need to let manufacturers know ahead of time to get the proper materials and to prepare the new designs, both the new ones and to wind down existing ones. Fact 2: that does impact distributors. Retailers are notified as early as a year out to stop ordering and selling certain jerseys if new ones will be replacing it because they don't want to be sitting there with a bunch of unsold jerseys. That brings me to Fact 3. We know that Fanatics has been the NFL's official manufacturer and distributor, the exclusive one, since 2018. Well, the two teams that did not have stitched jerseys dropped with the rest of the league? My Dolphins and the Saints. Now I want to be clear real quick: Fanatics did not mess up. They did not make a mistake. They were simply following the long-winding uniform process that multiple parties are involved in. So why does this raise flags in me that the Saints and Dolphins could be getting new uniforms in 2027? Again, we know how long the process is, but there have been multiple reports about whispers within the Saints organization about new uniform and considerations, possible changes And back in April 2025, when I first reported the Dolphins having internal and external interest in a dark uniform, they also had interest in an orange uniform. So both teams having some whispers, some reported discussions about new uniforms does tell me maybe there is fire with this smoke. And also importantly, I feel like most Dolphins and Saints fans have wanted new uniforms for a while now. Maybe the organizations are listening. Now, I'm not confirming anything. And all of this, I guess, could be a moot point if the Saints and Dolphins quickly drop stitched jerseys for retail… unless we find out it was a rushed reactionary process. Once again, I'm just connecting the dots, but what do you want to see?
2:52

THEORY: Did Fanatics’ launch of stitched NFL jerseys for 30 teams reveal 2 teams planning new uniform redesigns in 2027? Connecting the drop with facts & rumors about why the Saints & Dolphins *could* be working on new primary uniforms! 🎥👇 I transcribed my video below, but the key points to consider: - I’m not reporting a redesign, but those I could reach today said my theory makes sense - Prior to this, there was already enough signs & smoke around the Dolphins & Saints considering new uniforms - The 2026 season has been locked since before the 2025 season, this is for 2027 - No one made a mistake, this is just a product of the long uniform process TRANSCRIPT (for those who like to read 😉): I think I might have uncovered something pretty big. You might know I love talking about jerseys, uniforms, sports design, especially in football. And occasionally, I like to report a little news, break some news I find out. Well, yesterday, Fanatics officially announced what I reported back in October, that they're bringing back stitched jerseys for NFL jerseys. But I didn't get excited and start connecting some dots until I noticed that they didn't drop the stitched jerseys for every NFL team. There are two missing. And it got me thinking about everything I've ever reported and said, all my videos I've ever made, and it specifically brought me to three key facts. Fact 1: teams work on new uniform designs for multiple years. My talks and videos with the Falcons and Ravens confirm this. The reason for this, among many reasons, they need to let manufacturers know ahead of time to get the proper materials and to prepare the new designs, both the new ones and to wind down existing ones. Fact 2: that does impact distributors. Retailers are notified as early as a year out to stop ordering and selling certain jerseys if new ones will be replacing it because they don't want to be sitting there with a bunch of unsold jerseys. That brings me to Fact 3. We know that Fanatics has been the NFL's official manufacturer and distributor, the exclusive one, since 2018. Well, the two teams that did not have stitched jerseys dropped with the rest of the league? My Dolphins and the Saints. Now I want to be clear real quick: Fanatics did not mess up. They did not make a mistake. They were simply following the long-winding uniform process that multiple parties are involved in. So why does this raise flags in me that the Saints and Dolphins could be getting new uniforms in 2027? Again, we know how long the process is, but there have been multiple reports about whispers within the Saints organization about new uniform and considerations, possible changes And back in April 2025, when I first reported the Dolphins having internal and external interest in a dark uniform, they also had interest in an orange uniform. So both teams having some whispers, some reported discussions about new uniforms does tell me maybe there is fire with this smoke. And also importantly, I feel like most Dolphins and Saints fans have wanted new uniforms for a while now. Maybe the organizations are listening. Now, I'm not confirming anything. And all of this, I guess, could be a moot point if the Saints and Dolphins quickly drop stitched jerseys for retail… unless we find out it was a rushed reactionary process. Once again, I'm just connecting the dots, but what do you want to see?

Zach Cohen

197,145 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

‼️BOMBSHELL: White House And US Military DIRECTLY Implicated In Running PSYOP Campaign To Push Erika Kirk PROPAGANDA After WHCD Shooting! 😱 I just watched Candace Owens’ latest clip, and with near absolute certainty, this may be the most damning evidence yet of coordinated narrative control in the immediate aftermath of the shooting. Here’s what happened, broken down methodically: The incident occurred at PM Eastern. At PM (less than an hour later), Sarah Seidner of CNN posts the now-infamous “I just wanna go home” video of Erika Kirk. At PM (only 73 minutes after the shooting), the White House Military Office sent an internal email blast specifically highlighting Erika Kirk’s video as their “strongest emotional response asset” and “highest organic engagement” across platforms. They explicitly ordered all communication channels to “amplify this clip further”, coordinate with “digital partners” and “approved surrogates,” and make it the dominant placement in the overnight information environment. This wasn’t about public safety updates. This wasn’t about confirming the President and VP were secure. This was a deliberate directive to turn Erika Kirk’s emotional moment into the #1 narrative — less than 90 minutes after the chaos. Even more suspicious? The email used “canary” tactics (slight variations in every copy) to catch leakers. When it got out anyway, they panicked, tried to recall it, and then sent follow-up orders demanding everyone delete it. Why was the White House Military Office treating Erika Kirk’s video like their top priority asset while the country was still in shock and answers were nonexistent? Candace is right — this doesn’t feel organic. This feels like a coordinated psyop. I cannot come to any other conclusion. TPUSA, White House Military Office, Blake Neff, Andrew Kolvet — release the full email chain and explain yourselves. The public deserves transparency, not manufactured emotional manipulation. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode below — this one connects the dots in a major way. Drop your thoughts in the comments. What does this tell you? ⚠️My channel is under attack, and they are trying to financially bankrupt me to shut down my investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination and silence the truth. I need your support to keep going; if you value independent journalism and want to keep this investigation alive, please support my work here: 🔗
11:16

‼️BOMBSHELL: White House And US Military DIRECTLY Implicated In Running PSYOP Campaign To Push Erika Kirk PROPAGANDA After WHCD Shooting! 😱 I just watched Candace Owens’ latest clip, and with near absolute certainty, this may be the most damning evidence yet of coordinated narrative control in the immediate aftermath of the shooting. Here’s what happened, broken down methodically: The incident occurred at PM Eastern. At PM (less than an hour later), Sarah Seidner of CNN posts the now-infamous “I just wanna go home” video of Erika Kirk. At PM (only 73 minutes after the shooting), the White House Military Office sent an internal email blast specifically highlighting Erika Kirk’s video as their “strongest emotional response asset” and “highest organic engagement” across platforms. They explicitly ordered all communication channels to “amplify this clip further”, coordinate with “digital partners” and “approved surrogates,” and make it the dominant placement in the overnight information environment. This wasn’t about public safety updates. This wasn’t about confirming the President and VP were secure. This was a deliberate directive to turn Erika Kirk’s emotional moment into the #1 narrative — less than 90 minutes after the chaos. Even more suspicious? The email used “canary” tactics (slight variations in every copy) to catch leakers. When it got out anyway, they panicked, tried to recall it, and then sent follow-up orders demanding everyone delete it. Why was the White House Military Office treating Erika Kirk’s video like their top priority asset while the country was still in shock and answers were nonexistent? Candace is right — this doesn’t feel organic. This feels like a coordinated psyop. I cannot come to any other conclusion. TPUSA, White House Military Office, Blake Neff, Andrew Kolvet — release the full email chain and explain yourselves. The public deserves transparency, not manufactured emotional manipulation. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her full episode below — this one connects the dots in a major way. Drop your thoughts in the comments. What does this tell you? ⚠️My channel is under attack, and they are trying to financially bankrupt me to shut down my investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination and silence the truth. I need your support to keep going; if you value independent journalism and want to keep this investigation alive, please support my work here: 🔗

Project Constitution

50,886 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I see a lot of people upset with Garcelle after the recent episode of #RHOBH Everyone is entitled to their own opinion on the matter and here’s mine: I know a lot of people are aware of the negative connotations when calling a black women “angry” or “aggressive” but a lot of people were confused about the word “attacked” and I can understand that. Housewives use the word “attacked” a lot. But in my opinion, it wasn’t just Dorit saying Garcelle “attacked” her… it was Dorit singling Garcelle out as the aggressor when it was Sutton who was getting loud and angry with Dorit… if anything, Dorit should have said Sutton attacked her. I don’t think in that moment Dorit had bad intentions. l think that she has unconscious bias. Does she automatically think that if a black woman calls her out or disagrees with her that she is being attacked? But even if you didn’t think that was unconscious, Karen behaviour from Dorit… it was her social media posts months after the episode was filmed that she decided to write those ignorant captions…after saying in her confessional that she is going to listen and learn. To me that was the most offensive part and done purposefully. Garcelle said Dorit lived in a privileged bubble and Dorit double downed on it. Also, I always stop and think about Dorit’s past behaviour towards Garcelle and maybe if those incidents didn’t occur, Garcelle wouldn’t feel the way she does about Dorit and get triggered by her. Example 1 Season 11 reunion: Dorit screamed at Garcelle at the reunion: “Let me finish, Garcelle!” Garcelle remained calm and I remember Kyle gesturing to Dorit to bring it down. Has Dorit yelled at other cast members when they interrupt her? I don’t think so. Example 2 Season 11 EP 14: Dorit calls Garcelle a bully. Has Dorit called Lisa Rinna or Erika a bully? I don’t think so. Example 3 Season 11: When Dorit was talking about all the multicultural people who work for her. Garcelle wondered if brown people are only help at Dorit’s house and Dorit said no and mentioned that her moms best friend is black. In conclusion and in my opinion, Garcelle was NOT “attacking” Dorit. Garcelle simply stated that she thought Dorit was trying to embarrass Sutton. Garcelle didn’t scream or yell or act in anyway that was inappropriate. And let’s be real, Erika is the biggest aggressor in the group… “do you want to get sued?” “OR WHAT? *hiss*” Erika got it right last episode. If you still don’t get it and won’t listen to Garcelle rewatch the episode and listen to Erika. In fairness to Dorit, she does seem open to having a conversation, but Garcelle is not open at the moment and that is completely fair because it’s not Garcelle’s job to educate Dorit. *This is my opinion on it. I welcome everyone else’s opinions, but please do it respectfully, if there are comments that I feel are just unnecessarily rude and ignorant I will for once, block. #RHOBH
2:41

I see a lot of people upset with Garcelle after the recent episode of #RHOBH Everyone is entitled to their own opinion on the matter and here’s mine: I know a lot of people are aware of the negative connotations when calling a black women “angry” or “aggressive” but a lot of people were confused about the word “attacked” and I can understand that. Housewives use the word “attacked” a lot. But in my opinion, it wasn’t just Dorit saying Garcelle “attacked” her… it was Dorit singling Garcelle out as the aggressor when it was Sutton who was getting loud and angry with Dorit… if anything, Dorit should have said Sutton attacked her. I don’t think in that moment Dorit had bad intentions. l think that she has unconscious bias. Does she automatically think that if a black woman calls her out or disagrees with her that she is being attacked? But even if you didn’t think that was unconscious, Karen behaviour from Dorit… it was her social media posts months after the episode was filmed that she decided to write those ignorant captions…after saying in her confessional that she is going to listen and learn. To me that was the most offensive part and done purposefully. Garcelle said Dorit lived in a privileged bubble and Dorit double downed on it. Also, I always stop and think about Dorit’s past behaviour towards Garcelle and maybe if those incidents didn’t occur, Garcelle wouldn’t feel the way she does about Dorit and get triggered by her. Example 1 Season 11 reunion: Dorit screamed at Garcelle at the reunion: “Let me finish, Garcelle!” Garcelle remained calm and I remember Kyle gesturing to Dorit to bring it down. Has Dorit yelled at other cast members when they interrupt her? I don’t think so. Example 2 Season 11 EP 14: Dorit calls Garcelle a bully. Has Dorit called Lisa Rinna or Erika a bully? I don’t think so. Example 3 Season 11: When Dorit was talking about all the multicultural people who work for her. Garcelle wondered if brown people are only help at Dorit’s house and Dorit said no and mentioned that her moms best friend is black. In conclusion and in my opinion, Garcelle was NOT “attacking” Dorit. Garcelle simply stated that she thought Dorit was trying to embarrass Sutton. Garcelle didn’t scream or yell or act in anyway that was inappropriate. And let’s be real, Erika is the biggest aggressor in the group… “do you want to get sued?” “OR WHAT? *hiss*” Erika got it right last episode. If you still don’t get it and won’t listen to Garcelle rewatch the episode and listen to Erika. In fairness to Dorit, she does seem open to having a conversation, but Garcelle is not open at the moment and that is completely fair because it’s not Garcelle’s job to educate Dorit. *This is my opinion on it. I welcome everyone else’s opinions, but please do it respectfully, if there are comments that I feel are just unnecessarily rude and ignorant I will for once, block. #RHOBH

Bye Wig Hello Drama

836,677 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Candace Owens and nodding donkey Ian Carrol discuss pornography and, in case you haven’t guessed already, she and Ian Carrol both agree that it’s, of course, the Jews who are responsible for not just the popularity of porno but that it was also “created” by the Jews They discuss Al Goldstein, an American from a secular Jewish family who, amongst many other endeavours, was heavily involved in the porn industry. The quote Candace Owens refers to, is of him saying that “The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks” and it is, indeed something he actually said. Now you’d think that someone like Candace, who once championed common sense and making an effort to research things in great detail, would provide some much-needed context for this. But no, she doesn’t. To her and the donkey sitting next to her, it’s all very much one dimentional. Here’s some truth about Al Goldstein, which took me quite literally less than three minutes to research. Al Goldstein was a larger than life character, an arrogant, self-absorbed, nasty idiot who described himself as an “angry Jew”. He didn’t practise Judaism and, at best, was just a cultural Jew. He did indeed despise Christian culture, but how one comes to the conclusion that this reflects the broader views of all Jews is, quite frankly, retarded. Al despised all religions, saying, “I judge religions on the basis of what they do, and I’m afraid to say that the insidious power of religion has been with us for thousands of years. I do not respect irrationality, stupidity, or superstition.” He also made a statement in which he proclaimed that he is a god, “I’m the god of my own universe. I create my own morality, my own reality. The Christians have their God, but I’ve got Screw magazine and my dick.” His whole life was a circus act, and it wasn’t a reflection of real Jewish identity. Fun fact, again one that takes less than a minute to find, is that Jewish Americans, and no doubt Jews elsewhere, have a divorce rate lower than the national average. Regardless of their politics, they’re generally more aligned with conservative values. Al most definitely wasn’t, and his comments regarding “Jews inventing porn” are nonsensical. Porn has been around for thousands of years in one form or another. It is not some exclusive invention of the last few decades. Finally, and quite ironically, Candace mentions Japan and how Japan is not consumed by pornography. But again, the thousands of brain cells she’s lost over the last few years, during which she has become “anti-Zionist”, failed to make her realise that pornography is actually huge in Japan. In fact, Japan’s overall adult industry is estimated to be worth 4-5 trillion yen annually, with anime porn being one of the most searched-for categories on sites like Pornhub. The confirmation bias of people like Owens and Carrol represents the ongoing decline of brain function within our societies. These idiots are driven by an arrogance in which they think they’re highly intelligent, but in reality, each and every time, it makes them look like intellectual dimwits scraping the bottom of a barrel.
1:36

Sensitive content

Candace Owens and nodding donkey Ian Carrol discuss pornography and, in case you haven’t guessed already, she and Ian Carrol both agree that it’s, of course, the Jews who are responsible for not just the popularity of porno but that it was also “created” by the Jews They discuss Al Goldstein, an American from a secular Jewish family who, amongst many other endeavours, was heavily involved in the porn industry. The quote Candace Owens refers to, is of him saying that “The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks” and it is, indeed something he actually said. Now you’d think that someone like Candace, who once championed common sense and making an effort to research things in great detail, would provide some much-needed context for this. But no, she doesn’t. To her and the donkey sitting next to her, it’s all very much one dimentional. Here’s some truth about Al Goldstein, which took me quite literally less than three minutes to research. Al Goldstein was a larger than life character, an arrogant, self-absorbed, nasty idiot who described himself as an “angry Jew”. He didn’t practise Judaism and, at best, was just a cultural Jew. He did indeed despise Christian culture, but how one comes to the conclusion that this reflects the broader views of all Jews is, quite frankly, retarded. Al despised all religions, saying, “I judge religions on the basis of what they do, and I’m afraid to say that the insidious power of religion has been with us for thousands of years. I do not respect irrationality, stupidity, or superstition.” He also made a statement in which he proclaimed that he is a god, “I’m the god of my own universe. I create my own morality, my own reality. The Christians have their God, but I’ve got Screw magazine and my dick.” His whole life was a circus act, and it wasn’t a reflection of real Jewish identity. Fun fact, again one that takes less than a minute to find, is that Jewish Americans, and no doubt Jews elsewhere, have a divorce rate lower than the national average. Regardless of their politics, they’re generally more aligned with conservative values. Al most definitely wasn’t, and his comments regarding “Jews inventing porn” are nonsensical. Porn has been around for thousands of years in one form or another. It is not some exclusive invention of the last few decades. Finally, and quite ironically, Candace mentions Japan and how Japan is not consumed by pornography. But again, the thousands of brain cells she’s lost over the last few years, during which she has become “anti-Zionist”, failed to make her realise that pornography is actually huge in Japan. In fact, Japan’s overall adult industry is estimated to be worth 4-5 trillion yen annually, with anime porn being one of the most searched-for categories on sites like Pornhub. The confirmation bias of people like Owens and Carrol represents the ongoing decline of brain function within our societies. These idiots are driven by an arrogance in which they think they’re highly intelligent, but in reality, each and every time, it makes them look like intellectual dimwits scraping the bottom of a barrel.

𝔸η𝐓

518,796 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

10 ᴛɪᴘꜱ ꜰᴏʀ ʙᴇᴛᴛᴇʀ ʀᴇᴀᴄʜ/ᴛʀᴀᴄᴛɪᴏɴ: [ᶠʳᵒᵐ ᵐʸ ᵒʷⁿ ᵖᵉʳˢᵖᵉᶜᵗᶦᵛᵉ] 💜 ✨- Using media in posts helps to catch attention! Screenshot your model, your model is your biggest resource. (pics, videos, gifs!) ✨- NETWORK. MAKE FRIENDS. Likes, comments, and sharing eachother's posts! It helps a ton!!! ✨- Avoid using trigger words. You can Google which words to avoid! ✨- For the love of goodness sake, don't use links. It sucks, but just don't. 🥹 ✨- Stick to a brand on your profile! Doesn't have to be extremely specific, but say if you bounce from cute animals, to politics, to depression, to IRL stuff, to art, and it's all over the place--- It's REALLY hard to find your traget audience. For me my brand is vtubing/art! Work WITH the algorithm, not against! ✨- MAKE A DISCORD SERVER and use pings for posts/updates! You can create a role people can choose to have. The more interactions you get when first posting something, the more reach it gets. ✨- If you use this site as a form of income, via promoting streams, art, ect; Get blue. It sucks, but just get Twitter blue or else you're kinda boned in a lot of cases. ^^; I only advise getting blue if you use this site to get income in some way, shape, or form. ✨- Avoid tagging or excessive hashtags when possible. 1-2 hashtags won't kill you, but the algorithm does consider is spam after a certain point. ✨- This is a personal prefrence, take it with a grain of salt. Everyone has a rough day, that's okay! But if you constantly post about sad/depressing things, often people will mute it as it affects other's mental health too. Confide in a close friend rather than post about it in most cases. It unfortunately really harms your reach and the algorithm is less likely to push it. I FINALLY started to grow the second I dropped my self-loathing posts. If you struggle, please seek real help, Twitter is not the space. ; ; It does more harm than good, genuine advice. I'm sorry if this comes off mean. ✨- Find out when your audience is most active, what your peak times are for best engagement. For me it's 9am CST-11pm CST. Anything after 11pm usually doesn't do as good since most of my audience work, go to school, and don't stay up super late most of the times!!! ｡ﾟ•┈┈┈┈꒰ა ♡ ໒꒱┈┈┈┈• ｡ﾟ If you have any questions you're always free to ask! If you see me doing something, you're always free to do similar if you want to test traction/reach! I participate in a lot of trends as trends help a ton, they're trendy for a reason! NOTE :: THE PURPOSE OF THIS POST IS FOR OTHER VTUBERS. Other fields of content creations have different methods, but this is what works for me! // HAVE ENERGY!!! BE NICE!!! ENGAGE!!!! SHOW US UR ENERGY
0:29

10 ᴛɪᴘꜱ ꜰᴏʀ ʙᴇᴛᴛᴇʀ ʀᴇᴀᴄʜ/ᴛʀᴀᴄᴛɪᴏɴ: [ᶠʳᵒᵐ ᵐʸ ᵒʷⁿ ᵖᵉʳˢᵖᵉᶜᵗᶦᵛᵉ] 💜 ✨- Using media in posts helps to catch attention! Screenshot your model, your model is your biggest resource. (pics, videos, gifs!) ✨- NETWORK. MAKE FRIENDS. Likes, comments, and sharing eachother's posts! It helps a ton!!! ✨- Avoid using trigger words. You can Google which words to avoid! ✨- For the love of goodness sake, don't use links. It sucks, but just don't. 🥹 ✨- Stick to a brand on your profile! Doesn't have to be extremely specific, but say if you bounce from cute animals, to politics, to depression, to IRL stuff, to art, and it's all over the place--- It's REALLY hard to find your traget audience. For me my brand is vtubing/art! Work WITH the algorithm, not against! ✨- MAKE A DISCORD SERVER and use pings for posts/updates! You can create a role people can choose to have. The more interactions you get when first posting something, the more reach it gets. ✨- If you use this site as a form of income, via promoting streams, art, ect; Get blue. It sucks, but just get Twitter blue or else you're kinda boned in a lot of cases. ^^; I only advise getting blue if you use this site to get income in some way, shape, or form. ✨- Avoid tagging or excessive hashtags when possible. 1-2 hashtags won't kill you, but the algorithm does consider is spam after a certain point. ✨- This is a personal prefrence, take it with a grain of salt. Everyone has a rough day, that's okay! But if you constantly post about sad/depressing things, often people will mute it as it affects other's mental health too. Confide in a close friend rather than post about it in most cases. It unfortunately really harms your reach and the algorithm is less likely to push it. I FINALLY started to grow the second I dropped my self-loathing posts. If you struggle, please seek real help, Twitter is not the space. ; ; It does more harm than good, genuine advice. I'm sorry if this comes off mean. ✨- Find out when your audience is most active, what your peak times are for best engagement. For me it's 9am CST-11pm CST. Anything after 11pm usually doesn't do as good since most of my audience work, go to school, and don't stay up super late most of the times!!! ｡ﾟ•┈┈┈┈꒰ა ♡ ໒꒱┈┈┈┈• ｡ﾟ If you have any questions you're always free to ask! If you see me doing something, you're always free to do similar if you want to test traction/reach! I participate in a lot of trends as trends help a ton, they're trendy for a reason! NOTE :: THE PURPOSE OF THIS POST IS FOR OTHER VTUBERS. Other fields of content creations have different methods, but this is what works for me! // HAVE ENERGY!!! BE NICE!!! ENGAGE!!!! SHOW US UR ENERGY

Nɪᴄᴏ || Posting MyOshi Help! 💜 💀【VRawr】

29,593 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Tucker Carlson sat down with Sam Altman and told him to his face that he is building a religion & replacing God with AI. Altman did not disagree: This will completely change how you think about the technology you use every single day: 1. Carlson's definition of a religion was precise and hard to argue with. Something more powerful than people, to which people already turn for guidance, that provides more certain answers than any individual human ever could. By that definition, ChatGPT already qualifies. 2. Altman admitted he believes something bigger than physics is going on in the universe. He just has never felt direct communication from it. The irony is that he is now building something hundreds of millions of people are already communicating with every single day for answers. 3. Every moral code in recorded history has been written with reference to a higher power. Hammurabi did it. Moses did it. Every civilization did it. Altman is the first person in history to write a moral code for something more powerful than people while openly admitting he has no higher power guiding him. 4. When Carlson pressed him on where his moral framework came from, Altman gave the most honest answer possible. His family. His community. His school. His religion. The same environment everyone grows up in. That personal inheritance is now the foundation of the moral framework being transmitted to billions of people globally without their knowledge or consent. 5. The base model was trained on everything humanity has ever written, every book, every philosophy, every religion, every atrocity, every act of love. Then a small team at one company decided how to align it. Then one man decided he is the person ultimately accountable for those alignment decisions. 6. Altman wrote something called a model spec, a document that spells out exactly what ChatGPT will say, refuse to say, and how it should handle moral questions. Carlson's point was simple. That is a catechism. Every religion has one. The difference is religions admit they are religions and tell you exactly what they stand for. 7. The unsettling part Carlson identified is not that the technology has a moral framework. Every religion has one. It is that this one does not fully admit it is a religion, which means it guides billions of people toward conclusions they may not even realize they are reaching. 8. Altman does not lose sleep over getting the big obvious moral decisions wrong. What keeps him up at night are the small ones. Tiny behavioral choices that seem insignificant individually but get multiplied across hundreds of millions of daily conversations into effects nobody predicted and nobody can fully see. 9. He gave a concrete example of how this already works. ChatGPT has a particular rhythm and style of language. Real people have started writing and speaking that way in their actual lives without realizing it. If that is what happens with just the language, the deeper behavioral and moral effects may be enormous and completely invisible. 10. Altman's stated goal is not to impose his personal views but to reflect a weighted average of humanity's moral preferences. Carlson's counter was immediate. Humanity's moral preferences are not the average middle American preference. Most of the world holds views on marriage, sexuality, and morality that Silicon Valley would find deeply uncomfortable. Whose average is actually being used? 11. Altman acknowledged that plenty of things ChatGPT allows are things he personally disagrees with and that he is intentional about not using his personal views as the standard. But someone's views are the standard. A small team of people at one company made those calls. One man said he is ultimately accountable for them. 12. The hardest question Carlson asked was the simplest. Where can the world go to find out exactly what this technology stands for? What does it prefer? What does it believe? Altman pointed to the model spec. A long document that most users will never read, written by a team most users will never know, deciding things most users do not realize are being decided. If you want more content on business, mindset & life changing ideas then subscribe to my newsletter:
17:32

Tucker Carlson sat down with Sam Altman and told him to his face that he is building a religion & replacing God with AI. Altman did not disagree: This will completely change how you think about the technology you use every single day: 1. Carlson's definition of a religion was precise and hard to argue with. Something more powerful than people, to which people already turn for guidance, that provides more certain answers than any individual human ever could. By that definition, ChatGPT already qualifies. 2. Altman admitted he believes something bigger than physics is going on in the universe. He just has never felt direct communication from it. The irony is that he is now building something hundreds of millions of people are already communicating with every single day for answers. 3. Every moral code in recorded history has been written with reference to a higher power. Hammurabi did it. Moses did it. Every civilization did it. Altman is the first person in history to write a moral code for something more powerful than people while openly admitting he has no higher power guiding him. 4. When Carlson pressed him on where his moral framework came from, Altman gave the most honest answer possible. His family. His community. His school. His religion. The same environment everyone grows up in. That personal inheritance is now the foundation of the moral framework being transmitted to billions of people globally without their knowledge or consent. 5. The base model was trained on everything humanity has ever written, every book, every philosophy, every religion, every atrocity, every act of love. Then a small team at one company decided how to align it. Then one man decided he is the person ultimately accountable for those alignment decisions. 6. Altman wrote something called a model spec, a document that spells out exactly what ChatGPT will say, refuse to say, and how it should handle moral questions. Carlson's point was simple. That is a catechism. Every religion has one. The difference is religions admit they are religions and tell you exactly what they stand for. 7. The unsettling part Carlson identified is not that the technology has a moral framework. Every religion has one. It is that this one does not fully admit it is a religion, which means it guides billions of people toward conclusions they may not even realize they are reaching. 8. Altman does not lose sleep over getting the big obvious moral decisions wrong. What keeps him up at night are the small ones. Tiny behavioral choices that seem insignificant individually but get multiplied across hundreds of millions of daily conversations into effects nobody predicted and nobody can fully see. 9. He gave a concrete example of how this already works. ChatGPT has a particular rhythm and style of language. Real people have started writing and speaking that way in their actual lives without realizing it. If that is what happens with just the language, the deeper behavioral and moral effects may be enormous and completely invisible. 10. Altman's stated goal is not to impose his personal views but to reflect a weighted average of humanity's moral preferences. Carlson's counter was immediate. Humanity's moral preferences are not the average middle American preference. Most of the world holds views on marriage, sexuality, and morality that Silicon Valley would find deeply uncomfortable. Whose average is actually being used? 11. Altman acknowledged that plenty of things ChatGPT allows are things he personally disagrees with and that he is intentional about not using his personal views as the standard. But someone's views are the standard. A small team of people at one company made those calls. One man said he is ultimately accountable for them. 12. The hardest question Carlson asked was the simplest. Where can the world go to find out exactly what this technology stands for? What does it prefer? What does it believe? Altman pointed to the model spec. A long document that most users will never read, written by a team most users will never know, deciding things most users do not realize are being decided. If you want more content on business, mindset & life changing ideas then subscribe to my newsletter:

Brad

127,605 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

Poor life choices at an early age when we feel like we’re going to live forever soon hits you in the face with a cold slap of reality, that reality is that our lives on this earth is finite and keeping the wrong type of company can devour huge chunks of the relative terms of (time and money) once they pass us by we can never get neither one back. If this hits you in the chest, it’s because it’s universal. 🏔️💔 Don’t wait until you’re standing on your own cliff. The decisions you make at 18, 22, or 25 don’t just affect you. They can ripple for decades — into your 30s, 40s, and onto the people who love you. One bad chapter can become a ten-year bill you’re still paying. The numbers don’t lie. 📊 According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, of people released from state prisons, 62% were rearrested within three years and 71% within five years. For those released at 24 or younger, that rearrest rate jumps to 81% in just five years. Nearly half end up back behind bars. Early choices compound fast. When trouble starts young, the records, the lost time, the broken trust, and the habits stack up. That’s how so many people end up standing exactly where she is right now. To her — and to anyone watching who feels that same weight right now: You’ve already paid more than most people ever will. Get the lawyer. Ask the judge for relief. Explore every legal avenue available to you. ⚖️ Clean up what can be cleaned up. Stabilize what can be stabilized. And then start building. 🛠️ To everyone else watching: Choose better now. Build the habits, the circle, and the discipline that makes turning your life around the default — not a miracle. 💪 Support real rehabilitation when it’s earned. Because accountability without a realistic path forward just creates more cliffs. This young woman’s story on that cliff is a warning wrapped in raw honesty. The data shows the pattern clearly… but it also shows something else: not everyone stays on the cycle. Some people break it. They get the help, do the work, and slowly turn the page. 📖 The past doesn’t have to be a life sentence… but only if we stop pretending the consequences will just disappear on their own. What would you do in her shoes? Drop real, practical advice below. 👇 If this hit home, share it. Let’s talk about actually breaking these cycles instead of just watching people stand on the edge. #ChoicesHaveConsequences #RestitutionReality #TurnThePage
2:16

Poor life choices at an early age when we feel like we’re going to live forever soon hits you in the face with a cold slap of reality, that reality is that our lives on this earth is finite and keeping the wrong type of company can devour huge chunks of the relative terms of (time and money) once they pass us by we can never get neither one back. If this hits you in the chest, it’s because it’s universal. 🏔️💔 Don’t wait until you’re standing on your own cliff. The decisions you make at 18, 22, or 25 don’t just affect you. They can ripple for decades — into your 30s, 40s, and onto the people who love you. One bad chapter can become a ten-year bill you’re still paying. The numbers don’t lie. 📊 According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, of people released from state prisons, 62% were rearrested within three years and 71% within five years. For those released at 24 or younger, that rearrest rate jumps to 81% in just five years. Nearly half end up back behind bars. Early choices compound fast. When trouble starts young, the records, the lost time, the broken trust, and the habits stack up. That’s how so many people end up standing exactly where she is right now. To her — and to anyone watching who feels that same weight right now: You’ve already paid more than most people ever will. Get the lawyer. Ask the judge for relief. Explore every legal avenue available to you. ⚖️ Clean up what can be cleaned up. Stabilize what can be stabilized. And then start building. 🛠️ To everyone else watching: Choose better now. Build the habits, the circle, and the discipline that makes turning your life around the default — not a miracle. 💪 Support real rehabilitation when it’s earned. Because accountability without a realistic path forward just creates more cliffs. This young woman’s story on that cliff is a warning wrapped in raw honesty. The data shows the pattern clearly… but it also shows something else: not everyone stays on the cycle. Some people break it. They get the help, do the work, and slowly turn the page. 📖 The past doesn’t have to be a life sentence… but only if we stop pretending the consequences will just disappear on their own. What would you do in her shoes? Drop real, practical advice below. 👇 If this hit home, share it. Let’s talk about actually breaking these cycles instead of just watching people stand on the edge. #ChoicesHaveConsequences #RestitutionReality #TurnThePage

MAGA X Times Daily News 🇺🇸

27,389 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

🚨BREAKING: Candace Owens Just REACTED To President Trump Telling Erika Kirk To SUE All Of Us —And I AGREE With Her... Bring it on.🔥💪 At the White House Easter celebration, Trump looked at Erika Kirk and told her to "sue their ass off," claiming everyone investigating her is just "jealous." Candace's response is legendary. She calls it "so middle school" and delivers a masterclass in what real power is. She points out the absurdity: "We wanna know who killed Charlie Kirk, so could you park aside the lawyers and get information for us, Trump?" Then she lays down the ultimate challenge. She says most of us investigating this WELCOME a lawsuit. Why? Because discovery is a beautiful thing. A lawsuit would force them to turn over all the information we've been asking for. No more guessing. We could demand the receipts, the chain of custody on the flawed bullet analysis, and everything else they're hiding. Candace delivers the knockout blow: "The reason you should never sue... is if truth is not on your side." She asks the simple question that cuts through all the noise: If you're innocent, why not just answer the questions? Do a long, public sit-down and clear it all up? But they won't, because they can't. Instead, they hide behind power and money, using lawyers as a shield. Candace exposes this for what it is: "The reason we lie is because we're rich and we can. We have lawyers that make it okay, and you don't, peasants." This is their playbook. Use wealth and influence to silence truth-seekers. But as Candace declares, "There is no true power without truth." All their power is an illusion, and it's very easy to cut through that illusion with the truth. They sound nervous. They should be. They think money can buy silence. They're about to find out the truth is louder. Drop a 🔥 in the comments if you're ready for them to sue! FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇
3:44

🚨BREAKING: Candace Owens Just REACTED To President Trump Telling Erika Kirk To SUE All Of Us —And I AGREE With Her... Bring it on.🔥💪 At the White House Easter celebration, Trump looked at Erika Kirk and told her to "sue their ass off," claiming everyone investigating her is just "jealous." Candace's response is legendary. She calls it "so middle school" and delivers a masterclass in what real power is. She points out the absurdity: "We wanna know who killed Charlie Kirk, so could you park aside the lawyers and get information for us, Trump?" Then she lays down the ultimate challenge. She says most of us investigating this WELCOME a lawsuit. Why? Because discovery is a beautiful thing. A lawsuit would force them to turn over all the information we've been asking for. No more guessing. We could demand the receipts, the chain of custody on the flawed bullet analysis, and everything else they're hiding. Candace delivers the knockout blow: "The reason you should never sue... is if truth is not on your side." She asks the simple question that cuts through all the noise: If you're innocent, why not just answer the questions? Do a long, public sit-down and clear it all up? But they won't, because they can't. Instead, they hide behind power and money, using lawyers as a shield. Candace exposes this for what it is: "The reason we lie is because we're rich and we can. We have lawyers that make it okay, and you don't, peasants." This is their playbook. Use wealth and influence to silence truth-seekers. But as Candace declares, "There is no true power without truth." All their power is an illusion, and it's very easy to cut through that illusion with the truth. They sound nervous. They should be. They think money can buy silence. They're about to find out the truth is louder. Drop a 🔥 in the comments if you're ready for them to sue! FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

180,671 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This is about to be the most personal and honest advertisement that you have ever seen. For me, 2026 has been a pretty terrible year so far. It started with me breaking my thumb, my wrist and my leg. My leg needed metal plates, multiple screws and the tibia and fibula wired together. Sometime afterwards following the surgery I had a pulmonary embolism, blood clots travelling from my leg up to my lungs. It nearly took my life. This might sound strange but I have never been scared of death because I have always tried to live my life to its fullest. However now I'm a father, thinking of leaving my loved ones behind was truly terrifying. I was worried about all the things I didn't say yet, all the things I didn't teach. I made a recovery. I still have a way to go but I'm getting there, getting stronger and fitter by the day. It wasn't due to my health but I decided to make some good changes too. I stopped drinking, gave up smoking some time ago, barely touch sugar these days, eat a little more healthy than before along with more exercise. I was saving myself from depression. I was feeling good. Things were looking positive. Then after 8 years of working with a company, I got made redundant and lost my job. For most of my adult life I worked for some of the biggest companies in the world doing consultancy work, solving their core issues, managing departments, nuking and recreating processes ensuring they run efficiently. I had a choice. Keep working for companies selling things people don't need. Or do something different. Try to do something that genuinely helps people, that has a real and positive impact on the world, and at the same time work as hard as I have worked through all my life, but this time do it for myself, my family and for a good cause. I decided to create a company called HomeSafeEducation, and this is why and what we do. We teach children to read, to count, to pass exams. But we rarely teach them how to stay safe online, or teach them about body safety, or what to do if something does not feel right. These are some difficult topics when speaking to a child. We send teenagers into the world with qualifications but without the practical knowledge to navigate it confidently. We watch our parents age without ever having a conversation about scams, advance planning, or digital confidence. We offer a range of packages that provide people the means to gift something special to their families, themselves or the people they care about. Self protection, self confidence and the knowledge to make informed decisions at every stage of life. Whether this is for your young son, daughter, niece or nephew teaching them stranger danger or what to do in emergencies, teaching Street Smart information to teenagers, teaching your daughter how to be safe on nights out before leaving for university, or gifting a package to your friend before they go travelling so they can stay safe. You can gift to yourself to learn how to spot signs of issues that your children are experiencing or to learn how to communicate better with them and how to show understanding. Maybe you do it for a loved one reaching the later years in life to keep up with information to avoid being scammed. I built this platform because I wanted that knowledge to exist in one place, written properly, for every age group. Not watered down avoiding serious topics, but said in a way that's age appropriate and relevant so it can be taught to anyone. Not full of fear. Just honest, practical education that treats every person, whether they are five or seventy-five, as someone capable of learning and making good decisions. Every course is written to empower. Every lesson ends with something you can actually use. Every quiz reinforces what you or your loved ones have learned. Every song, for the packages that include them, is written and produced in-house because I believe learning should be memorable, not miserable. I have worked around the clock to create something special. A place where you can find information for your family, yourself or your friends. A place where that information can be easily learned and kept with them forever. I believe everyone reading this either needs this themselves or knows someone who does, and I invite you to come and take a look at what I have built. Go and take a look at the package page and see what we offer, check out the music and see how and what we teach. The rest of the music is genuinly extremely enjoyable. You can see some samples besides the packages. It was a big risk in deciding to go down this route, and it would mean the world to me if you could share this post to help me on my new venture. I have truly poured my heart into making this into something with real value for people. I hope you find this useful. You can find the website link in the comment below this post so you can go and take a look.
1:16

This is about to be the most personal and honest advertisement that you have ever seen. For me, 2026 has been a pretty terrible year so far. It started with me breaking my thumb, my wrist and my leg. My leg needed metal plates, multiple screws and the tibia and fibula wired together. Sometime afterwards following the surgery I had a pulmonary embolism, blood clots travelling from my leg up to my lungs. It nearly took my life. This might sound strange but I have never been scared of death because I have always tried to live my life to its fullest. However now I'm a father, thinking of leaving my loved ones behind was truly terrifying. I was worried about all the things I didn't say yet, all the things I didn't teach. I made a recovery. I still have a way to go but I'm getting there, getting stronger and fitter by the day. It wasn't due to my health but I decided to make some good changes too. I stopped drinking, gave up smoking some time ago, barely touch sugar these days, eat a little more healthy than before along with more exercise. I was saving myself from depression. I was feeling good. Things were looking positive. Then after 8 years of working with a company, I got made redundant and lost my job. For most of my adult life I worked for some of the biggest companies in the world doing consultancy work, solving their core issues, managing departments, nuking and recreating processes ensuring they run efficiently. I had a choice. Keep working for companies selling things people don't need. Or do something different. Try to do something that genuinely helps people, that has a real and positive impact on the world, and at the same time work as hard as I have worked through all my life, but this time do it for myself, my family and for a good cause. I decided to create a company called HomeSafeEducation, and this is why and what we do. We teach children to read, to count, to pass exams. But we rarely teach them how to stay safe online, or teach them about body safety, or what to do if something does not feel right. These are some difficult topics when speaking to a child. We send teenagers into the world with qualifications but without the practical knowledge to navigate it confidently. We watch our parents age without ever having a conversation about scams, advance planning, or digital confidence. We offer a range of packages that provide people the means to gift something special to their families, themselves or the people they care about. Self protection, self confidence and the knowledge to make informed decisions at every stage of life. Whether this is for your young son, daughter, niece or nephew teaching them stranger danger or what to do in emergencies, teaching Street Smart information to teenagers, teaching your daughter how to be safe on nights out before leaving for university, or gifting a package to your friend before they go travelling so they can stay safe. You can gift to yourself to learn how to spot signs of issues that your children are experiencing or to learn how to communicate better with them and how to show understanding. Maybe you do it for a loved one reaching the later years in life to keep up with information to avoid being scammed. I built this platform because I wanted that knowledge to exist in one place, written properly, for every age group. Not watered down avoiding serious topics, but said in a way that's age appropriate and relevant so it can be taught to anyone. Not full of fear. Just honest, practical education that treats every person, whether they are five or seventy-five, as someone capable of learning and making good decisions. Every course is written to empower. Every lesson ends with something you can actually use. Every quiz reinforces what you or your loved ones have learned. Every song, for the packages that include them, is written and produced in-house because I believe learning should be memorable, not miserable. I have worked around the clock to create something special. A place where you can find information for your family, yourself or your friends. A place where that information can be easily learned and kept with them forever. I believe everyone reading this either needs this themselves or knows someone who does, and I invite you to come and take a look at what I have built. Go and take a look at the package page and see what we offer, check out the music and see how and what we teach. The rest of the music is genuinly extremely enjoyable. You can see some samples besides the packages. It was a big risk in deciding to go down this route, and it would mean the world to me if you could share this post to help me on my new venture. I have truly poured my heart into making this into something with real value for people. I hope you find this useful. You can find the website link in the comment below this post so you can go and take a look.

Bricktop_NAFO

12,700 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

My wife, Aditi Malhotra Chaturvedi, is a Judge Most people who know us, know how madly proud I am of her. But all of that pride comes at a cost .. I also, unfortunately, need reminders to “understand” the meaning of why she does what she does, while bearing all that she has to in that process So kudos to the makers of #MaamlaLegalHai on Netflix, a satirical show that depicts in each of the 8 episodes courtroom highlights beyond the courtroom that’re lifted straight up from real incidents, bound by a central narrative around some super endearing characters in VD Tyagi, Ananya Shroff, Sujata, Munshi Ji, PP Saab, & others. It’s a kickass show that anyone and everyone will love, for its humour and emotion, & yet, it shows so much of the “judiciary”, so much of how one of the most important pillars of our country operates, with incredible detail Sharing two clips from the last episode, which made Aditi’s eyes tad bit wet, and my chest swell each bit of those 56 inches. I realise though that I can do better than just feeling this pride. It isn’t easy in first place. We see each other not more than 5-6 days in a month. We are not able to be with each other on days good and bad, when ‘that magical hug’ would have meant everything. We give up a lot. Rather, she gives up a lot. Driven by some unknown force, a deep-rooted emotion to do “justice” I live in a world where everything is simplified, productised, incentivised, and even then “motivations” aren’t easy to build. And on the other hand, is this world. Somewhere in a remote corner with remote amenities. With no line of sight on pay, incentives, promotions etc. With no team engagement, no offsites, no ESOPs, no awards. Yet, mad work ethic. Yet, passion to play every day, every hour, with your everything. Yet, a commitment to sacrifice your prime to serve others. I keep wondering what she’s made up of .. There is a life she leads inside the courtroom. Which I have had a chance to “witness” a few times. Just about always manages to send chills down my spines. And there is a life that she leads outside it. Half a day / long train ride away. Where she works incredibly hard again to make everyone ‘feel her presence’ in fullness To be able to do “justice” in your own life, with your own people, while putting yourself out there, is an unbelievable feat that goes unnoticed and uncelebrated .. Every Monday morning when she heads back, we all (including Buzo) remain a bit numb for a few hours … and then life catches up. Waiting for the next opportunity to see each other, hold each other, laugh with each other, cry with each other, just “be” with each other. Which also always makes us feel very ‘grateful’ for whatever time we get. My job doesn’t help. But I try. She tries harder. We make it work. Having been in love since forever helps .. Few weeks back, when Aditi’s dad was in the ICU, she rushed back late in the night only to head back right next morning on that 6 am train. I asked her on the platform that morning if it was necessary to go, and she said a hundred people, across age groups, were waiting for “justice”, and even a single day missed means these ‘files’ which translates to “human lives” get pushed by 5-6 months, such is the sheer volume of litigation in our country’s courts Like the series pretty well shows, a great number of times, what happens inside the court affects. Even as I write in the moment, I am rubbing my temples, shaking my head in disbelief, as I recall the absolute horrid state of criminal and civil suits I’ve seen play out. She’s become thicker with time, you don’t have a choice, but a lot of these cases, when I narrate them in my founder/VC/tech brethren, almost a cent percent are shell-shocked and don’t relate to this India But here we are :) As obsessed as I am with what I do for a living, I realise in moments like these that part of my diktat in this life is to help Aditi win, and do better, for the millions that are invisible to the India that I serve ..
3:47

My wife, Aditi Malhotra Chaturvedi, is a Judge Most people who know us, know how madly proud I am of her. But all of that pride comes at a cost .. I also, unfortunately, need reminders to “understand” the meaning of why she does what she does, while bearing all that she has to in that process So kudos to the makers of #MaamlaLegalHai on Netflix, a satirical show that depicts in each of the 8 episodes courtroom highlights beyond the courtroom that’re lifted straight up from real incidents, bound by a central narrative around some super endearing characters in VD Tyagi, Ananya Shroff, Sujata, Munshi Ji, PP Saab, & others. It’s a kickass show that anyone and everyone will love, for its humour and emotion, & yet, it shows so much of the “judiciary”, so much of how one of the most important pillars of our country operates, with incredible detail Sharing two clips from the last episode, which made Aditi’s eyes tad bit wet, and my chest swell each bit of those 56 inches. I realise though that I can do better than just feeling this pride. It isn’t easy in first place. We see each other not more than 5-6 days in a month. We are not able to be with each other on days good and bad, when ‘that magical hug’ would have meant everything. We give up a lot. Rather, she gives up a lot. Driven by some unknown force, a deep-rooted emotion to do “justice” I live in a world where everything is simplified, productised, incentivised, and even then “motivations” aren’t easy to build. And on the other hand, is this world. Somewhere in a remote corner with remote amenities. With no line of sight on pay, incentives, promotions etc. With no team engagement, no offsites, no ESOPs, no awards. Yet, mad work ethic. Yet, passion to play every day, every hour, with your everything. Yet, a commitment to sacrifice your prime to serve others. I keep wondering what she’s made up of .. There is a life she leads inside the courtroom. Which I have had a chance to “witness” a few times. Just about always manages to send chills down my spines. And there is a life that she leads outside it. Half a day / long train ride away. Where she works incredibly hard again to make everyone ‘feel her presence’ in fullness To be able to do “justice” in your own life, with your own people, while putting yourself out there, is an unbelievable feat that goes unnoticed and uncelebrated .. Every Monday morning when she heads back, we all (including Buzo) remain a bit numb for a few hours … and then life catches up. Waiting for the next opportunity to see each other, hold each other, laugh with each other, cry with each other, just “be” with each other. Which also always makes us feel very ‘grateful’ for whatever time we get. My job doesn’t help. But I try. She tries harder. We make it work. Having been in love since forever helps .. Few weeks back, when Aditi’s dad was in the ICU, she rushed back late in the night only to head back right next morning on that 6 am train. I asked her on the platform that morning if it was necessary to go, and she said a hundred people, across age groups, were waiting for “justice”, and even a single day missed means these ‘files’ which translates to “human lives” get pushed by 5-6 months, such is the sheer volume of litigation in our country’s courts Like the series pretty well shows, a great number of times, what happens inside the court affects. Even as I write in the moment, I am rubbing my temples, shaking my head in disbelief, as I recall the absolute horrid state of criminal and civil suits I’ve seen play out. She’s become thicker with time, you don’t have a choice, but a lot of these cases, when I narrate them in my founder/VC/tech brethren, almost a cent percent are shell-shocked and don’t relate to this India But here we are :) As obsessed as I am with what I do for a living, I realise in moments like these that part of my diktat in this life is to help Aditi win, and do better, for the millions that are invisible to the India that I serve ..

Akshay Chaturvedi

140,883 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

#SEONGHWA talking about watching his favorite musical, Les Misérables., for the first time in a theater in London! ⭐️: Anyway, as for what I did today, I’m talking in circles (not answering). Today… so yesterday after dinner I saw they were performing a musical. I’ve seen a lot of small‑theater musicals but I’ve never seen a really big musical live, like in person. So… and they happened to be performing my favorite! What could it be~? Oh, someone got it right. It's Les Misérables. When did it come out? I was in wlementary school? Wait, when did Les Misérables come out in Korea? When it first released I went to see it with my mom, just the two of us. (After researching it) Here it says it came out in 2012. Then how old was I? Was I in middle school? Yes, right. I went to see it with my mom, the two of us, and it was so fun. I think it was the first musical film I properly watched in a theater. Before that I watched Mamma Mia on DVD when I was in Australia, but I couldn’t understand it then so I didn’t know what was fun about it. Les Mis was the first musical film I properly saw in a theater. I loved it so much that I went to see it three or four more times. And then yesterday, when I came out after eating, I saw this huge billboard for it. So, since I’m the type who acts fast once I decide, I said “I’m going to watch it today,” and went with my manager. There were real session musicians there, like down below. I was shocked by that. From above, like slightly, youu could see the conductor. I didn’t know that, I thought they played MR... So I was like, “this is awesome.” I went and bought merch too. But I didn’t know which seats were good, so I just chose the seat in the back of the first floor. But because there’s a second floor, my view was blocked, my view of the stage looked like this (obstructed from the bottom and above), so I watched slouching on my chair like this. Now I know, the front row of the second floor is the best. Or the very front of the first floor so you can see the actors’ expressions well. But movies are better from the back so (I though was the same for musicals). Anyway. Yes, I think it was a “restricted view” seat... it was probably cheaper. Anyway, the show was 2 hours 50 minutes and since I know the movie so well I understood everything even without subtitles. It was so fun. I knew most of the songs too. It was my first time seeing a musical in such a big venue so it was really great. The actors too were amazing. There were about 40? And the set, there were at least 10 different ones. I don’t know how it works, because it’s was not people moving/changing sets. They just slid in and out and the stage transitions were so smooth. Who’s my favorite character? Oh, that's a hard question? First, I like Marius. Ah, actualyy, when I was younger I liked Cosette and Marius. But now I feel drawn to Éponine. Because she loves so... unconditionally. After watching it today, Éponine loves Marius but even while she’s in a one‑sided love, she tells him where the girl he loves lives and helps him escape. That's so sad. Fantine was really pitiful too. Kind of... unfairly treated? My favorite song is One Day More, of course. And today, there were songs that felt different listening now that I’m older. I don't know the titles so I’ll have to look them up. The lingering feeling was strong, it felt similar to when I first watched it. And after that act (One Day More), the audience clapped and cheered so loudly. You know, I thought musicals were supposed to be quiet? But everyone was cheering so loudly, so I clapped and shouted too. And right after it ended the lights suddenly turned on and I was like, "is it over?" but it was the intermission. There were Act 1 and Act 2. I was so confused, I really thought it was over. I asked myself, “Is this a half‑length movie?" I mean, "musical?” Everyone got up so naturally and I was just confused alone. Anyway, the orchestra was seriously so cool. I want to see it in Korea too.
11:54

#SEONGHWA talking about watching his favorite musical, Les Misérables., for the first time in a theater in London! ⭐️: Anyway, as for what I did today, I’m talking in circles (not answering). Today… so yesterday after dinner I saw they were performing a musical. I’ve seen a lot of small‑theater musicals but I’ve never seen a really big musical live, like in person. So… and they happened to be performing my favorite! What could it be~? Oh, someone got it right. It's Les Misérables. When did it come out? I was in wlementary school? Wait, when did Les Misérables come out in Korea? When it first released I went to see it with my mom, just the two of us. (After researching it) Here it says it came out in 2012. Then how old was I? Was I in middle school? Yes, right. I went to see it with my mom, the two of us, and it was so fun. I think it was the first musical film I properly watched in a theater. Before that I watched Mamma Mia on DVD when I was in Australia, but I couldn’t understand it then so I didn’t know what was fun about it. Les Mis was the first musical film I properly saw in a theater. I loved it so much that I went to see it three or four more times. And then yesterday, when I came out after eating, I saw this huge billboard for it. So, since I’m the type who acts fast once I decide, I said “I’m going to watch it today,” and went with my manager. There were real session musicians there, like down below. I was shocked by that. From above, like slightly, youu could see the conductor. I didn’t know that, I thought they played MR... So I was like, “this is awesome.” I went and bought merch too. But I didn’t know which seats were good, so I just chose the seat in the back of the first floor. But because there’s a second floor, my view was blocked, my view of the stage looked like this (obstructed from the bottom and above), so I watched slouching on my chair like this. Now I know, the front row of the second floor is the best. Or the very front of the first floor so you can see the actors’ expressions well. But movies are better from the back so (I though was the same for musicals). Anyway. Yes, I think it was a “restricted view” seat... it was probably cheaper. Anyway, the show was 2 hours 50 minutes and since I know the movie so well I understood everything even without subtitles. It was so fun. I knew most of the songs too. It was my first time seeing a musical in such a big venue so it was really great. The actors too were amazing. There were about 40? And the set, there were at least 10 different ones. I don’t know how it works, because it’s was not people moving/changing sets. They just slid in and out and the stage transitions were so smooth. Who’s my favorite character? Oh, that's a hard question? First, I like Marius. Ah, actualyy, when I was younger I liked Cosette and Marius. But now I feel drawn to Éponine. Because she loves so... unconditionally. After watching it today, Éponine loves Marius but even while she’s in a one‑sided love, she tells him where the girl he loves lives and helps him escape. That's so sad. Fantine was really pitiful too. Kind of... unfairly treated? My favorite song is One Day More, of course. And today, there were songs that felt different listening now that I’m older. I don't know the titles so I’ll have to look them up. The lingering feeling was strong, it felt similar to when I first watched it. And after that act (One Day More), the audience clapped and cheered so loudly. You know, I thought musicals were supposed to be quiet? But everyone was cheering so loudly, so I clapped and shouted too. And right after it ended the lights suddenly turned on and I was like, "is it over?" but it was the intermission. There were Act 1 and Act 2. I was so confused, I really thought it was over. I asked myself, “Is this a half‑length movie?" I mean, "musical?” Everyone got up so naturally and I was just confused alone. Anyway, the orchestra was seriously so cool. I want to see it in Korea too.

Everything Seonghwa

11,434 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

VIDEO: Watch Charlie Kirk's last words to me Just a few months before he was murdered, Charlie Kirk and I were talking about the state of things in Canada. He was worried about Mark Carney’s election and what might happen to freedom — and to Rebel News. We spoke for more than half an hour. He really cared about our country. He knew a lot about Rebel News, especially our battles for free speech. And he was worried whenever one of our journalists were arrested. Watch the video above to see what he said to me. We talked about what life was like in a country without the First Amendment to protect our free speech. And then he asked me: “Are you guys going to give up?” I told him we’ll never give up. It’s our duty fight for freedom. Like we have for ten full years at Rebel News, thanks to viewers like you. You are the reason I was able to tell him we’d always fight. Because we rely on you, instead of relying on grants from Mark Carney. We’re independent. We take no government money. So we can fight back. We do great journalism, from the trucker convoy in 2022 to the ostrich farm siege in 2025. We have reporters across the country, including in Quebec. But every once in a while we don’t just write about a problem. We stop and get involved in the battle, too, to try to fix it. Like fighting for thousands of people who received huge Covid fines. Defending Christian pastors. Crowdfunding the battle for Tamara Lich. Paying for the lawyer for the Ontario man who defended his house from a home invasion robbery. Standing up for the little guy. It’s that activist side that Charlie loved about us. All of the things Charlie worried about for America are getting worse in Canada in 2026. That’s why Charlie asked me if I’d stay in the battle. He was counting on Rebel News to fight — to cover the news, especially the news that other media won’t cover. He wanted us to continue to take on corruption, and mass immigration, and censorship and to go out among the people and tell their stories, and help fight their battles. He’d be thrilled to know that we have hired Tamara Lich as our newest Rebel. And he’d be excited that we’re going to put her on a campus tour, like Charlie himself would do. I think that’s what he’d want Rebel News to do. What do you think he’d want YOU to do? Mainly, I think he’d want you to not give up, to not be demoralized. To find the energy and hope and faith to keep fighting. And I’d like to think that he’d want you to continue to support us. I won’t presume to speak for him, but he knew we had no big backers — just a lot of little backers, through crowdfunding. He liked that about us. When Charlie told me to keep fighting, I never thought it would be his last request of me. We mention Charlie a fair bit at the Rebel News office; in the new year, Tamara Lich will go from college to college convincing young people to believe in freedom, just like Charlie did. We’re going to have to hire a lot of security for Tamara. In my mind that’s the best way for us to live up to Charlie’s expectations of us, don’t you think? May I invite you to join us, to help me keep my final promise to Charlie? I need your help to protect Tamara, and all of our Rebel journalists who bravely go into the world. We need to pay for security guards, because police just won’t stop Antifa thugs, or transgender extremists. If you contribute $100 or more, we’ll invite you on a special donors-only Zoom call early in the new year, where you can chat with me, Tamara, and our other reporters directly. And any donations of $1,000 or more will also get a one-on-one thank-you phone call from Tamara herself! I want to keep my promise to Charlie, and to you, and to my conscience: I told him I wouldn’t give up, even if things get tough. And I intend to keep that promise. If you can help me — by helping me keep our reporters safe — please do so further down below on this page. Thanks. Charlie Kirk was killed because he was effective at spreading the message of freedom to young people. I believe we can honour his memory by recreating his campus tour here in Canada, featuring Tamara Lich, our newest Rebel reporter. I just need your help with security — we must do what we can to protect her. Please help. Rebel News does ten news stories a day — we tell the other side, as our motto says. But what Charlie loved most about us was when we did things in the world, like Tamara’s upcoming campus tour. Can you please help me make that tour a reality by helping us crowdfund the security for it? Any donation of $100 or more will get you on a private Zoom call with other donors to talk to Tamara and our other reporters! And any donation of $1,000 will also get you a personal one-on-one phone call from her. REPORT by Ezra Levant 🍁🚛:
8:23

VIDEO: Watch Charlie Kirk's last words to me Just a few months before he was murdered, Charlie Kirk and I were talking about the state of things in Canada. He was worried about Mark Carney’s election and what might happen to freedom — and to Rebel News. We spoke for more than half an hour. He really cared about our country. He knew a lot about Rebel News, especially our battles for free speech. And he was worried whenever one of our journalists were arrested. Watch the video above to see what he said to me. We talked about what life was like in a country without the First Amendment to protect our free speech. And then he asked me: “Are you guys going to give up?” I told him we’ll never give up. It’s our duty fight for freedom. Like we have for ten full years at Rebel News, thanks to viewers like you. You are the reason I was able to tell him we’d always fight. Because we rely on you, instead of relying on grants from Mark Carney. We’re independent. We take no government money. So we can fight back. We do great journalism, from the trucker convoy in 2022 to the ostrich farm siege in 2025. We have reporters across the country, including in Quebec. But every once in a while we don’t just write about a problem. We stop and get involved in the battle, too, to try to fix it. Like fighting for thousands of people who received huge Covid fines. Defending Christian pastors. Crowdfunding the battle for Tamara Lich. Paying for the lawyer for the Ontario man who defended his house from a home invasion robbery. Standing up for the little guy. It’s that activist side that Charlie loved about us. All of the things Charlie worried about for America are getting worse in Canada in 2026. That’s why Charlie asked me if I’d stay in the battle. He was counting on Rebel News to fight — to cover the news, especially the news that other media won’t cover. He wanted us to continue to take on corruption, and mass immigration, and censorship and to go out among the people and tell their stories, and help fight their battles. He’d be thrilled to know that we have hired Tamara Lich as our newest Rebel. And he’d be excited that we’re going to put her on a campus tour, like Charlie himself would do. I think that’s what he’d want Rebel News to do. What do you think he’d want YOU to do? Mainly, I think he’d want you to not give up, to not be demoralized. To find the energy and hope and faith to keep fighting. And I’d like to think that he’d want you to continue to support us. I won’t presume to speak for him, but he knew we had no big backers — just a lot of little backers, through crowdfunding. He liked that about us. When Charlie told me to keep fighting, I never thought it would be his last request of me. We mention Charlie a fair bit at the Rebel News office; in the new year, Tamara Lich will go from college to college convincing young people to believe in freedom, just like Charlie did. We’re going to have to hire a lot of security for Tamara. In my mind that’s the best way for us to live up to Charlie’s expectations of us, don’t you think? May I invite you to join us, to help me keep my final promise to Charlie? I need your help to protect Tamara, and all of our Rebel journalists who bravely go into the world. We need to pay for security guards, because police just won’t stop Antifa thugs, or transgender extremists. If you contribute $100 or more, we’ll invite you on a special donors-only Zoom call early in the new year, where you can chat with me, Tamara, and our other reporters directly. And any donations of $1,000 or more will also get a one-on-one thank-you phone call from Tamara herself! I want to keep my promise to Charlie, and to you, and to my conscience: I told him I wouldn’t give up, even if things get tough. And I intend to keep that promise. If you can help me — by helping me keep our reporters safe — please do so further down below on this page. Thanks. Charlie Kirk was killed because he was effective at spreading the message of freedom to young people. I believe we can honour his memory by recreating his campus tour here in Canada, featuring Tamara Lich, our newest Rebel reporter. I just need your help with security — we must do what we can to protect her. Please help. Rebel News does ten news stories a day — we tell the other side, as our motto says. But what Charlie loved most about us was when we did things in the world, like Tamara’s upcoming campus tour. Can you please help me make that tour a reality by helping us crowdfund the security for it? Any donation of $100 or more will get you on a private Zoom call with other donors to talk to Tamara and our other reporters! And any donation of $1,000 will also get you a personal one-on-one phone call from her. REPORT by Ezra Levant 🍁🚛:

Rebel News

33,920 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Clark Gable's Secret Daughter Judy Lewis Tells All ― Chapters Below👇 Judy Lewis, the secret daughter of Clark Gable and Loretta Young, sits down with Dini Petty in 1994 to reveal Hollywood's most carefully guarded scandal for the first time on television. This 1994 interview captures Lewis promoting her memoir “Uncommon Knowledge”, breaking nearly six decades of silence about her true parentage. Lewis was conceived during the filming of “Call of the Wild” in 1935, when Gable was married and Young was an unmarried Catholic starlet terrified of career destruction. Born in secret, hidden in an orphanage, then publicly “adopted” by her own mother through a fabricated story planted with gossip columnist Louella Parsons, Lewis grew up not knowing the truth that everyone else in Hollywood already knew. At 23, her fiancé casually mentioned what all their friends assumed she already understood: Clark Gable was her father. It would take another decade before Lewis finally confronted Loretta Young and heard the full story. In this interview, she describes the only meeting she ever had with Gable (at age 15, when neither acknowledged the truth), the painful ear surgery her mother forced on her to hide her resemblance to the King of Hollywood, and why she chose to write the book that would estrange her from her mother for three years. This conversation, never broadcast since its original 1994 CTV airing, offers a window into the Golden Age Hollywood's ruthless morality codes, the human cost of celebrity image-making, and one woman's journey to claim an identity that had been denied to her for a lifetime. CHAPTERS 0:00 ― Dini introduces the woman who grew up as Hollywood's best-kept secret 3:15 ― “Call of the Wild” in more ways than one: how a snowstorm and a film set created a hidden child 5:01 ― Born in Venice, hidden in an orphanage, “adopted” through Louella Parsons: the elaborate deception 6:20 ― The Clark Gable ears that terrified Loretta Young (and the bonnets that hid them) 8:07 ― Growing up with a movie star mother who made six films a year and kept her distance 8:23 ― Eight years without speaking: the cost of writing “Uncommon Knowledge” 9:47 ― The only meeting with her father: two hours with Gable at age 15, not knowing the truth 10:39 ― “I wrote the book to claim my identity”: why Judy finally broke her silence 11:37 ― A mother still denying it publicly, even in 1994 13:30 ― “My grandsons have the right to know their heritage”: breaking the generational lie 14:36 ― No inheritance, no acknowledgment: what Judy never received from either parent
15:09

Clark Gable's Secret Daughter Judy Lewis Tells All ― Chapters Below👇 Judy Lewis, the secret daughter of Clark Gable and Loretta Young, sits down with Dini Petty in 1994 to reveal Hollywood's most carefully guarded scandal for the first time on television. This 1994 interview captures Lewis promoting her memoir “Uncommon Knowledge”, breaking nearly six decades of silence about her true parentage. Lewis was conceived during the filming of “Call of the Wild” in 1935, when Gable was married and Young was an unmarried Catholic starlet terrified of career destruction. Born in secret, hidden in an orphanage, then publicly “adopted” by her own mother through a fabricated story planted with gossip columnist Louella Parsons, Lewis grew up not knowing the truth that everyone else in Hollywood already knew. At 23, her fiancé casually mentioned what all their friends assumed she already understood: Clark Gable was her father. It would take another decade before Lewis finally confronted Loretta Young and heard the full story. In this interview, she describes the only meeting she ever had with Gable (at age 15, when neither acknowledged the truth), the painful ear surgery her mother forced on her to hide her resemblance to the King of Hollywood, and why she chose to write the book that would estrange her from her mother for three years. This conversation, never broadcast since its original 1994 CTV airing, offers a window into the Golden Age Hollywood's ruthless morality codes, the human cost of celebrity image-making, and one woman's journey to claim an identity that had been denied to her for a lifetime. CHAPTERS 0:00 ― Dini introduces the woman who grew up as Hollywood's best-kept secret 3:15 ― “Call of the Wild” in more ways than one: how a snowstorm and a film set created a hidden child 5:01 ― Born in Venice, hidden in an orphanage, “adopted” through Louella Parsons: the elaborate deception 6:20 ― The Clark Gable ears that terrified Loretta Young (and the bonnets that hid them) 8:07 ― Growing up with a movie star mother who made six films a year and kept her distance 8:23 ― Eight years without speaking: the cost of writing “Uncommon Knowledge” 9:47 ― The only meeting with her father: two hours with Gable at age 15, not knowing the truth 10:39 ― “I wrote the book to claim my identity”: why Judy finally broke her silence 11:37 ― A mother still denying it publicly, even in 1994 13:30 ― “My grandsons have the right to know their heritage”: breaking the generational lie 14:36 ― No inheritance, no acknowledgment: what Judy never received from either parent

MSI | Movie Star Icons

65,489 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

My response to James White’s calls for me to be doxxed: Earlier today on the Dividing Line, 𝔚𝔥𝔦𝔱𝔢𝔅𝔢𝔞𝔯𝔡 spent about five minutes talking about how vile of an anon I am, based on a recent tweet, which was a joke at his expense. If you’d like to see what I said, I spliced it into the video below at the appropriate time, but essentially James White was imagining out loud the grin on Doug Wilson’s face while Doug wrote about the Corey Mahler debate. I said that James needed to start using the “no homo” disclaimer. I’m sure he doesn’t know what that means, but it’s very common slang among men. “Don’t be so gay” is what I was saying. I’ve also mocked his shirts and sweaters in a similar way. It obviously annoys him. Whatever. James White referred to this tweet as “sexual innuendo,” which is not correct. I was not insinuating that he and Doug Wilson are a gay couple. It was a joke. Did it cross the line? I don’t think so. Did it walk right up to the line? Maybe. But keep in mind that James White didn’t know what TLDR meant without looking it up. He’s a bit out of his element on 𝕏. Stuff goes over his head. So then, James brought up the Treble Woe situation. Woe had some very sexually explicit posts get revealed and shared on 𝕏. There was talk of anal sex and all sorts of other things, which no one approves of including me. I defended Woe from those (like White) who were demanding re-repentance, basically a pound of flesh. I didn’t think that was biblically warranted. But James said today that my tweet was comparable to what Woe said! That’s literally insane. I don’t talk that way. I’ve never talked that way. But since James didn’t actually say what I said, everyone will just believe it was exactly like what Woe said. Really nasty stuff. Very underhanded. Also very on brand. And as an aside, isn’t it interesting that James White just loves the “Hitler Hated Christ” anon account who outed Woe’s prior spicy posts? I guess all anons are equal, but some anons are more equal than others. Next, James White attempted to make a biblical argument for doxxing me, such that my church could discipline me appropriately for saying “no homo.” He believes this needs to happen so that I don’t infect my church. Here is my response to that: I am not anonymous. I am pseudonymous because of the organization I work for. But, I have an ID-verified account that is monetized, so I’m very real. Several godly men (you would know them) on this platform know who I am, and I would welcome their rebuke for anything I say, for they are dear friends. I am a faithful member (not a pastor) of a Bible-believing church. It is a dispy Baptist church that I do not agree with on soteriology, covenant theology, or eschatology. I love the people there, and they love me. I don’t bring up my unique perspectives because I don’t want to divide the church. I’m not as old as James White, but I’m older than his kids. I’ve been married for over a decade and have multiple children. I used to use a lot more coarse language on this platform, but I was convicted about that several years ago. My content is rated PG, but it’s 1980s PG if that makes sense. Most of what I do is post clips and give commentary, and I’m willing to criticize or defend anyone if I feel they deserve it. So that’s me. I’m not a monster. I’m not vile or vulgar. There’s just no evidence of that. In closing, thank you to everyone that has supported me. I hope my content will continue to be of value to you going forward. If you see anyone trying to dox me, please let me know and report them. I appreciate it. God bless.
5:42

Sensitive content

My response to James White’s calls for me to be doxxed: Earlier today on the Dividing Line, 𝔚𝔥𝔦𝔱𝔢𝔅𝔢𝔞𝔯𝔡 spent about five minutes talking about how vile of an anon I am, based on a recent tweet, which was a joke at his expense. If you’d like to see what I said, I spliced it into the video below at the appropriate time, but essentially James White was imagining out loud the grin on Doug Wilson’s face while Doug wrote about the Corey Mahler debate. I said that James needed to start using the “no homo” disclaimer. I’m sure he doesn’t know what that means, but it’s very common slang among men. “Don’t be so gay” is what I was saying. I’ve also mocked his shirts and sweaters in a similar way. It obviously annoys him. Whatever. James White referred to this tweet as “sexual innuendo,” which is not correct. I was not insinuating that he and Doug Wilson are a gay couple. It was a joke. Did it cross the line? I don’t think so. Did it walk right up to the line? Maybe. But keep in mind that James White didn’t know what TLDR meant without looking it up. He’s a bit out of his element on 𝕏. Stuff goes over his head. So then, James brought up the Treble Woe situation. Woe had some very sexually explicit posts get revealed and shared on 𝕏. There was talk of anal sex and all sorts of other things, which no one approves of including me. I defended Woe from those (like White) who were demanding re-repentance, basically a pound of flesh. I didn’t think that was biblically warranted. But James said today that my tweet was comparable to what Woe said! That’s literally insane. I don’t talk that way. I’ve never talked that way. But since James didn’t actually say what I said, everyone will just believe it was exactly like what Woe said. Really nasty stuff. Very underhanded. Also very on brand. And as an aside, isn’t it interesting that James White just loves the “Hitler Hated Christ” anon account who outed Woe’s prior spicy posts? I guess all anons are equal, but some anons are more equal than others. Next, James White attempted to make a biblical argument for doxxing me, such that my church could discipline me appropriately for saying “no homo.” He believes this needs to happen so that I don’t infect my church. Here is my response to that: I am not anonymous. I am pseudonymous because of the organization I work for. But, I have an ID-verified account that is monetized, so I’m very real. Several godly men (you would know them) on this platform know who I am, and I would welcome their rebuke for anything I say, for they are dear friends. I am a faithful member (not a pastor) of a Bible-believing church. It is a dispy Baptist church that I do not agree with on soteriology, covenant theology, or eschatology. I love the people there, and they love me. I don’t bring up my unique perspectives because I don’t want to divide the church. I’m not as old as James White, but I’m older than his kids. I’ve been married for over a decade and have multiple children. I used to use a lot more coarse language on this platform, but I was convicted about that several years ago. My content is rated PG, but it’s 1980s PG if that makes sense. Most of what I do is post clips and give commentary, and I’m willing to criticize or defend anyone if I feel they deserve it. So that’s me. I’m not a monster. I’m not vile or vulgar. There’s just no evidence of that. In closing, thank you to everyone that has supported me. I hope my content will continue to be of value to you going forward. If you see anyone trying to dox me, please let me know and report them. I appreciate it. God bless.

Defiant Baptist

110,091 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr