What does the evidence indicate, so far, killed Charlie Kirk? Based on what we know, and we see..? It appears it was one of these, an Elbit Bird of Prey, about 350 yards away. I built this simulation to help you visualize what may have happened, 110' in the... air. We spent over $6 billion with them over the last few years, and they have over 3,000 employees in the USA. Until better evidence surfaces, this is the best hypothesis to date. 7.62 x51mm NATO skived round from 350 yards out, and 110' above the ground, at the Computer Science Building. I suggest the round that was found on the roof of the Computer Science Building was NOT an un-fired .223 round, but was a spent 7.62 brass casing, and THAT is why it wasn't photographed, or taken into evidence - it ruined the lone gunman narrative, just like what we saw in Las Vegas; evidence is hidden, and not recorded, that breaks the narrative. Then again, I could be wrong. #HypotheticallySpeakingshow more

The supporting cast:

I think the drones flying around UVU that day were cutting edge technology not known to the public.

Unless a better theory comes along this is by the best analysis of an extremely well planned public murder of Kirk with patsies. Just like Butler. Patsies seem to be a recurring thread in misdirection such as Vegas and 9/11.

Your hypothesis of the motive and execution makes the most sense. I believe that's why people aren't sharing your information.

“Can’t we just drone this guy?” Sounds so familiar. If possible then, why not now.

Who found the round on computer science? They still employed with the agency?

No one knows, but the guy that was testifying isn't there anymore...

We appreciate you.

All this technology and no brass cratcher for the one round that was planned on being fired? I don’t know

Lapel mic. Dug up and covered crime scene to hide shrapnel and evidence from Lapel

What’s the size of this thing? Great hypothesis…

@Grok How big is an Elbit THOR? What does it weigh?

@melisaleigh66 The Elbit THOR is a foldable quadcopter mini-UAS that packs into a backpack for rapid 2-minute deployment. System weight is roughly 10 kg including battery (about 9.5 kg empty). Maximum takeoff weight reaches 25 kg, with payload capacity up to 13 kg.

@I_Am_JohnCullen They are vague…. I looked up as well and can’t find anything about how big, or small they are. I did see that they’re from Israel 🤔

Exact public specs skip linear dimensions like rotor span. It folds into a standard backpack for one-person carry, system weight about 10 kg including battery, max takeoff 25 kg with up to 13 kg payload. Deploys in under 2 minutes as a quadcopter. Yes, made by Elbit Systems of Israel.

Perfect. Makes total sense. I might speculate… The RODE Wireless Microphone box (timed-to-the-shot backup explosive) on Charlie was also utilized. Too much internal damage for “only” an Elbit Bird of Prey 5.53 shot into CK’s “man of steel” neck. A “Double Tap”. To make sure.

We never ever get the really story from any branch of our GOVT. What I really don’t understand is why our Establishment DC wanted Kirk dead?

You’re cursing and insulting anyone who dares to disagree, yet you refuse to explain why Charlie’s right sleeve was pulled upright. You’ll have to explain that before your theory can be taken more seriously than any other.

This is good work. Idk if you are right but this is how it should be done.

How much would one of those cost, and are they available in NZ? Only asking for a friend, not for my mission to take out a local cockerel, obviously.

Are you sure they didn't use a flying shark? What about an exploding cigar? Maybe it was suicide?

Yeah that "live round" they found on the other roof is so sus! Who TF accidentally or purposefully leaves a live round at a freaking murder scene?? I love how damning the Google Trend search data is 👇

Shut up. Tai has proven the case. Why do you bother?

Tai is my illegitimate son, with some whore I met in New Orleans...

And nobody saw the gun carrying drone. Interesting.

Harpole said they spent thousands of dollars on drones and had them at other events, but all of a sudden they didn't have them at this one. But we saw them, and Turek said he was sharing drone footage back to the ops. We saw that initially too. But don't believe your lying eyes

Whoever planned the assassination wanted to use the most accurate method that would finish the job. It’s totally illogical that they would rely on an exploding mike or an inexperienced shooter. They couldn’t risk mistakes, had to be infallible, sophisticated military technology.

Of course you are wrong. No projectile could produce this kind of entry wound outside the shirt.

If such a drone exists (not in doubt), would it not be more sleek, featuring an internal firing mechanism? The dangling gun seems silly considering how much money goes into such contraptions, but what do I know…

Such a stupid idea it’s not worth paying attention to. You were doing so well with the greater Israel angle. This is just dumb.

It's from Israel, moron.

Holy shit you guys constantly stun me with your stupidity

John cullen is a disinfo agent. JOHN CULLEN IS NOT HIS REAL NAME.

Good work. Now do JK Rowling. Then, do Publius. George Orwell was really Eric Arthur Blair. Dr. Seuss was really Theodor Seuss Geisel. John le Carré was really David Cornwell. Agatha Christie wrote six romance novels as Mary Westmacott. Anne Rice was born Howard Allen Frances O’Brien. What difference does it make, if the work is good? (Ask your mom when was the first time we made love.. 9 months before you were born?)