Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

What does the prosecutor who convicted Susan Smith think about the Lindsay Clancy trial? I asked him to break down one of the most difficult cases he’s seen since 1995 on NewsNation Live this weekend during my Sunday show on NewsNation The Lindsay Clancy murder trial resumes today as...

lauraingle's profile picture

Laura Ingle

70,117 subscribers

13,373 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Lindsay Clancy's murder trial was paused multiple times Wednesday as she sobbed loudly and said "I can't do it" during testimony about the injuries her children suffered when they were killed. Jurors were sent out twice for recess as Clancy had emotional reactions to the testimony.
1:02

Lindsay Clancy's murder trial was paused multiple times Wednesday as she sobbed loudly and said "I can't do it" during testimony about the injuries her children suffered when they were killed. Jurors were sent out twice for recess as Clancy had emotional reactions to the testimony.

CBS Evening News with Tony Dokoupil

13,487 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

Some of the most heartbreaking testimony during the first day of Lindsay Clancy's murder trial was when her former husband, Patrick Clancy, was asked to talk about their three children: Cora (5), Dawson (3), and Callan (8 months). We saw video of the family celebrating at a birthday party and were shown photos of each of the children. Patrick spoke about the morning and afternoon before the kids were killed - that Lindsay took Cora to the doctor, then they built a snowman and everyone was having a really good day. As Patrick testified, Lindsay looked down at the ground and the two made very little eye contact. He has since remarried and is living in New York. Patrick will be back on the stand Wednesday morning as the trial continues. Lindsay Clancy has not denied killing the kids, but says she was suffering from postpartum psychosis and should not be held criminally responsible
6:05

Some of the most heartbreaking testimony during the first day of Lindsay Clancy's murder trial was when her former husband, Patrick Clancy, was asked to talk about their three children: Cora (5), Dawson (3), and Callan (8 months). We saw video of the family celebrating at a birthday party and were shown photos of each of the children. Patrick spoke about the morning and afternoon before the kids were killed - that Lindsay took Cora to the doctor, then they built a snowman and everyone was having a really good day. As Patrick testified, Lindsay looked down at the ground and the two made very little eye contact. He has since remarried and is living in New York. Patrick will be back on the stand Wednesday morning as the trial continues. Lindsay Clancy has not denied killing the kids, but says she was suffering from postpartum psychosis and should not be held criminally responsible

Nate Eaton

243,232 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

Lindsay Clancy's murder trial was stopped twice on Wednesday when she had emotional breakdowns after hearing testimony about the injuries she caused to her children when she killed them in January 2023. Judge William Sullivan gave jurors a pointed reminder after the disruptions, stressing that their verdict must be based solely on the evidence, “not on sympathy or anger or passion.” Clancy became visibly distraught when two pathologists from the Massachusetts Office of the State Medical Examiner gave testimony about the causes of death for Clancy's children. She strangled Cora (age 5), Dawson (age 3) and Callan (8 months) to death using exercise bands in the basement of the family's home as she allegedly suffered from postpartum psychosis. Clancy has had similar emotional outbursts each time her children's injuries have been brought up during the trial. #LindsayClancy
1:45

Lindsay Clancy's murder trial was stopped twice on Wednesday when she had emotional breakdowns after hearing testimony about the injuries she caused to her children when she killed them in January 2023. Judge William Sullivan gave jurors a pointed reminder after the disruptions, stressing that their verdict must be based solely on the evidence, “not on sympathy or anger or passion.” Clancy became visibly distraught when two pathologists from the Massachusetts Office of the State Medical Examiner gave testimony about the causes of death for Clancy's children. She strangled Cora (age 5), Dawson (age 3) and Callan (8 months) to death using exercise bands in the basement of the family's home as she allegedly suffered from postpartum psychosis. Clancy has had similar emotional outbursts each time her children's injuries have been brought up during the trial. #LindsayClancy

Criminally Obsessed

48,123 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

NEW: Patrick Clancy took the stand today as the first witness in the murder trial of his ex-wife, Lindsay Clancy. He testified that Lindsay told him in December 2022 she had experienced suicidal thoughts and was afraid she might hurt their children. Lindsay killed the couple's three children inside their Massachusetts home in January 2023 before attempting to take her own life.
2:36

NEW: Patrick Clancy took the stand today as the first witness in the murder trial of his ex-wife, Lindsay Clancy. He testified that Lindsay told him in December 2022 she had experienced suicidal thoughts and was afraid she might hurt their children. Lindsay killed the couple's three children inside their Massachusetts home in January 2023 before attempting to take her own life.

Callie Cassick

107,640 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

The Lindsay Clancy case raises one of the hardest questions in criminal justice: when mental illness is at the center of a tragedy, where do accountability and compassion meet? I sit down with criminal defense attorney Sara Azari and reproductive psychiatrist Dr. Catherine Birndorf to examine the evidence, postpartum psychosis, Massachusetts' insanity standard, and whether prosecutors can prove Lindsay Clancy knew right from wrong. Then, in a powerful conversation, Rusty Yates (the former husband of Andrea Yates) shares what it's like to survive the unimaginable, why he stood by Andrea in court, and the message he'd want Patrick Clancy to hear today. WATCH NOW: #lindsayclancy
1:45

The Lindsay Clancy case raises one of the hardest questions in criminal justice: when mental illness is at the center of a tragedy, where do accountability and compassion meet? I sit down with criminal defense attorney Sara Azari and reproductive psychiatrist Dr. Catherine Birndorf to examine the evidence, postpartum psychosis, Massachusetts' insanity standard, and whether prosecutors can prove Lindsay Clancy knew right from wrong. Then, in a powerful conversation, Rusty Yates (the former husband of Andrea Yates) shares what it's like to survive the unimaginable, why he stood by Andrea in court, and the message he'd want Patrick Clancy to hear today. WATCH NOW: #lindsayclancy

Christopher C. Cuomo

27,787 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

Jack Smith breaks silence, reveals he had "tons of evidence" in the criminal case against Trump that Aileen Cannon dismissed: “Both cases involved classified documents; the difference is the facts. In my particular case, we had tons of evidence of willfulness and obstructive evidence: publicly saying ‘these are my documents’ or things like that, and ‘I can keep them,’” Smith said. “The government even tried to get them back before there was a criminal investigation, and then after the investigation started, [Trump] still [refused] to give them back, and then [tried] to obstruct the investigation. That sort of evidence didn’t exist in the other case.” Smith did not investigate Biden’s classified documents case, but explained that there was no "willful retention of national defense information,” on Biden’s part or obstruction of the federal government’s attempts to retrieve documents for which Trump was indicted. “Both cases involved classified documents; the difference is the facts,” Smith said. “The rule of law allows for different outcomes when the facts are different. One of the major differences between the two cases is the obstructive conduct in the case that I investigated.”
2:34

Jack Smith breaks silence, reveals he had "tons of evidence" in the criminal case against Trump that Aileen Cannon dismissed: “Both cases involved classified documents; the difference is the facts. In my particular case, we had tons of evidence of willfulness and obstructive evidence: publicly saying ‘these are my documents’ or things like that, and ‘I can keep them,’” Smith said. “The government even tried to get them back before there was a criminal investigation, and then after the investigation started, [Trump] still [refused] to give them back, and then [tried] to obstruct the investigation. That sort of evidence didn’t exist in the other case.” Smith did not investigate Biden’s classified documents case, but explained that there was no "willful retention of national defense information,” on Biden’s part or obstruction of the federal government’s attempts to retrieve documents for which Trump was indicted. “Both cases involved classified documents; the difference is the facts,” Smith said. “The rule of law allows for different outcomes when the facts are different. One of the major differences between the two cases is the obstructive conduct in the case that I investigated.”

Bryan Dawson🇺🇸

621,662 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

A key question in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy is whether postpartum psychosis drove her to kill her three children. What is postpartum psychosis and how does it differ from postpartum depression? It's estimated to afflict only 1 to 2 per 1,000 women after delivery and experts at the Cleveland Clinic describe it as a mental health emergency affecting someone's sense of reality. CBS News' Shanelle Kaul has more.
1:25

A key question in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy is whether postpartum psychosis drove her to kill her three children. What is postpartum psychosis and how does it differ from postpartum depression? It's estimated to afflict only 1 to 2 per 1,000 women after delivery and experts at the Cleveland Clinic describe it as a mental health emergency affecting someone's sense of reality. CBS News' Shanelle Kaul has more.

CBS News

30,875 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

Nick Reiner faces charges of parricide — the killing of a parent by their child. It is one of the rarest crimes, and one of the most disturbing because it violates one of the most basic human bonds. Parents are supposed to protect their children. Children are not supposed to fear — or kill — their parents. This video examines the Nick Reiner murder trial, the meaning of parricide, and the warning signs and psychological factors experts say often precede these rare cases.
17:21

Nick Reiner faces charges of parricide — the killing of a parent by their child. It is one of the rarest crimes, and one of the most disturbing because it violates one of the most basic human bonds. Parents are supposed to protect their children. Children are not supposed to fear — or kill — their parents. This video examines the Nick Reiner murder trial, the meaning of parricide, and the warning signs and psychological factors experts say often precede these rare cases.

Dr. Phil

32,680 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Crossing live to you from the Ben Roberts-Smith bail hearing. Judge will issue decision in 45 minutes. MAIN TAKEAWAYS FROM BEN ROBERTS-SMITH BAIL HEARING SO FAR: 1. Crown Prosecutor compared Ben Roberts-Smith alleged crimes to terrorism as though he were Naveed Akram. This was part of his argument as to why he should be kept in prison. 2. Crown Prosecutor alleges Roberts-Smith was planning on moving overseas without telling authorities. I have no idea what the evidence for this is considering Roberts-Smith also made repeated efforts to surrender himself to authorities. 3. Crown Prosecutor is heavily relying on the earlier defamation case for evidence. They view the Besanko findings as having substantially defined “the evidentiary landscape” and BRS’s own testimony as locked in. This is unusual because criminal trials are meant to be tried on their own evidence to the criminal standard, and the defence flagged exactly this - “this will be decided on a body of evidence that will be nothing like the body of evidence in this case”
0:51

Crossing live to you from the Ben Roberts-Smith bail hearing. Judge will issue decision in 45 minutes. MAIN TAKEAWAYS FROM BEN ROBERTS-SMITH BAIL HEARING SO FAR: 1. Crown Prosecutor compared Ben Roberts-Smith alleged crimes to terrorism as though he were Naveed Akram. This was part of his argument as to why he should be kept in prison. 2. Crown Prosecutor alleges Roberts-Smith was planning on moving overseas without telling authorities. I have no idea what the evidence for this is considering Roberts-Smith also made repeated efforts to surrender himself to authorities. 3. Crown Prosecutor is heavily relying on the earlier defamation case for evidence. They view the Besanko findings as having substantially defined “the evidentiary landscape” and BRS’s own testimony as locked in. This is unusual because criminal trials are meant to be tried on their own evidence to the criminal standard, and the defence flagged exactly this - “this will be decided on a body of evidence that will be nothing like the body of evidence in this case”

Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼

27,919 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🚨 NOW: Karmelo Anthony's defense is FALLING APART in the murder trial of Austin Metcalf, he might face life in prison if convicted "Prosecutors in court showed jurors surveillance footage they say tells a different story [than Anthony's defense] — [it reportedly] shows a brief confrontation between Anthony and Metcalf, not a larger group, before Anthony runs from the scene and that fight. It only lasted about four minutes." "Jurors heard emotional testimony from Metcalf's track coach. He said that Metcalf was helping lead set-up efforts that day which basically means he was in charge of setting up the tent and equipment." "The coach testified and said athletes don't just go under other teams tents. This is something that's understood between the athletes." "The final jury does not include any black jurors. Prosecutors say this case has nothing to do with race and it should be decided on the facts. This trial is expected to last up to two weeks." — Brooke Taylor
1:32

🚨 NOW: Karmelo Anthony's defense is FALLING APART in the murder trial of Austin Metcalf, he might face life in prison if convicted "Prosecutors in court showed jurors surveillance footage they say tells a different story [than Anthony's defense] — [it reportedly] shows a brief confrontation between Anthony and Metcalf, not a larger group, before Anthony runs from the scene and that fight. It only lasted about four minutes." "Jurors heard emotional testimony from Metcalf's track coach. He said that Metcalf was helping lead set-up efforts that day which basically means he was in charge of setting up the tent and equipment." "The coach testified and said athletes don't just go under other teams tents. This is something that's understood between the athletes." "The final jury does not include any black jurors. Prosecutors say this case has nothing to do with race and it should be decided on the facts. This trial is expected to last up to two weeks." — Brooke Taylor

Eric Daugherty

1,885,574 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

"I have yet to hear any evidence whatsoever that the deadly force that was used against Austin Metcalf was justified." Criminal defense attorney Todd Shapiro was in the courtroom yesterday as witness testimony in the murder trial of Karmelo Anthony began - and he joins Katie tonight to break down what he saw and where he thinks the trial is headed.
2:06

"I have yet to hear any evidence whatsoever that the deadly force that was used against Austin Metcalf was justified." Criminal defense attorney Todd Shapiro was in the courtroom yesterday as witness testimony in the murder trial of Karmelo Anthony began - and he joins Katie tonight to break down what he saw and where he thinks the trial is headed.

Katie Pavlich Tonight

36,833 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

We’re in trouble A woman had jury duty. The entire jury had to be dismissed and the trial cancelled because “One of the other jurors had decided to go home and put all of the information from the trial that the jury had received into ChatGPT to try to solve the case. And they had to dismiss the whole jury” I’ll bet this is happening more than anyone wants to admit…. Imagine being on trial and people on the jury are asking AI what they should vote on your verdict….. this is extremely dangerous
1:45

We’re in trouble A woman had jury duty. The entire jury had to be dismissed and the trial cancelled because “One of the other jurors had decided to go home and put all of the information from the trial that the jury had received into ChatGPT to try to solve the case. And they had to dismiss the whole jury” I’ll bet this is happening more than anyone wants to admit…. Imagine being on trial and people on the jury are asking AI what they should vote on your verdict….. this is extremely dangerous

Wall Street Apes

234,332 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

The preliminary hearing in the case of the State v. Tyler Robinson will take place in Provo, UT next week, July 6-10. This is going to be an incredibly difficult but important week for all of us in the Turning Point family, but especially Erika and Charlie’s parents. We've been getting a lot of questions about what exactly this means and what to expect. This is NOT the trial. This is a pre-trial judicial proceeding. There will be no jury and the sole purpose of the hearing is to determine whether prosecutors have gathered enough evidence for the case to move forward to trial. The hearing is expected to last most of the week and will include witness testimony, evidence presented by prosecutors, and cross-examination by the defense. Charlie’s parents and Erika will be there together throughout the proceedings. They are not attending as public figures, but as grieving loved ones. I hope the media and social media gives them the space and respect they deserve during what will be a very challenging few days. The hearing was originally scheduled for May but was later rescheduled and now falls immediately between previously scheduled events and our Chapter Leadership Summit, which had all been on the calendar long before Charlie was murdered. We'll be following the hearing very closely and covering developments throughout the week, including special episodes of the show after court adjourns to cover the biggest developments each day.
7:56

The preliminary hearing in the case of the State v. Tyler Robinson will take place in Provo, UT next week, July 6-10. This is going to be an incredibly difficult but important week for all of us in the Turning Point family, but especially Erika and Charlie’s parents. We've been getting a lot of questions about what exactly this means and what to expect. This is NOT the trial. This is a pre-trial judicial proceeding. There will be no jury and the sole purpose of the hearing is to determine whether prosecutors have gathered enough evidence for the case to move forward to trial. The hearing is expected to last most of the week and will include witness testimony, evidence presented by prosecutors, and cross-examination by the defense. Charlie’s parents and Erika will be there together throughout the proceedings. They are not attending as public figures, but as grieving loved ones. I hope the media and social media gives them the space and respect they deserve during what will be a very challenging few days. The hearing was originally scheduled for May but was later rescheduled and now falls immediately between previously scheduled events and our Chapter Leadership Summit, which had all been on the calendar long before Charlie was murdered. We'll be following the hearing very closely and covering developments throughout the week, including special episodes of the show after court adjourns to cover the biggest developments each day.

Andrew Kolvet

204,904 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨BREAKING: All-White Jury Selected in Karmelo Anthony Murder Trial In Collin County, Texas, a jury of 12 people and 6 alternates — none of them Black — was selected today for the trial of Karmelo Anthony. Anthony, a Black teenager, is charged with murder in the 2025 stabbing death of white student Austin Metcalf at a Frisco track meet. Anthony claims self-defense. His defense team accused prosecutors of improperly striking the final three Black candidates from the jury pool. The selection of an all-white jury in this racially charged case has sparked debate about fairness and public confidence in the verdict. Critics point to past cases, such as the acquittal of Asian store owner Chikei Rick Chow by an all-white jury despite strong evidence against him. Does striking Black jurors — even for stated race-neutral reasons — in a high-profile, racially sensitive murder trial involving a self-defense claim undermine trust in the justice system?
3:45

🚨BREAKING: All-White Jury Selected in Karmelo Anthony Murder Trial In Collin County, Texas, a jury of 12 people and 6 alternates — none of them Black — was selected today for the trial of Karmelo Anthony. Anthony, a Black teenager, is charged with murder in the 2025 stabbing death of white student Austin Metcalf at a Frisco track meet. Anthony claims self-defense. His defense team accused prosecutors of improperly striking the final three Black candidates from the jury pool. The selection of an all-white jury in this racially charged case has sparked debate about fairness and public confidence in the verdict. Critics point to past cases, such as the acquittal of Asian store owner Chikei Rick Chow by an all-white jury despite strong evidence against him. Does striking Black jurors — even for stated race-neutral reasons — in a high-profile, racially sensitive murder trial involving a self-defense claim undermine trust in the justice system?

i Expose Racists & Pedos

617,625 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Smith: "Our assessment of the evidence is that [Trump] is the person most responsible for what happened on January 6th. He caused what happened. It was foreseeable to him and then when it happened he tried to exploit in furtherance of the conspiracy."
0:42

Smith: "Our assessment of the evidence is that [Trump] is the person most responsible for what happened on January 6th. He caused what happened. It was foreseeable to him and then when it happened he tried to exploit in furtherance of the conspiracy."

The Bulwark

23,990 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Before the jury entered the courtroom on Tuesday, Lindsay Clancy agreed to a "stipulation of facts," speaking for the first time in her murder trial. She was sworn in by a court officer and answered questions from the judge, confirming that she and the prosecution agree on certain facts in the case. "This stipulation basically relieves the government of having to bring in dozens, if not more, witnesses to prove chain of custody of blood, fluids, the bands, DNA, all of that," defense attorney Reddington said. "Rather than have days of testimony, the stipulation will avoid that."
2:46

Before the jury entered the courtroom on Tuesday, Lindsay Clancy agreed to a "stipulation of facts," speaking for the first time in her murder trial. She was sworn in by a court officer and answered questions from the judge, confirming that she and the prosecution agree on certain facts in the case. "This stipulation basically relieves the government of having to bring in dozens, if not more, witnesses to prove chain of custody of blood, fluids, the bands, DNA, all of that," defense attorney Reddington said. "Rather than have days of testimony, the stipulation will avoid that."

CBS News

31,514 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce