Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

What does Verstappen mean when he says Silverstone is now "constantly flat"? I ran the 2026 lap through my optimizer to find out - and it might back him up. From T5 to T15, you may not need to brake at all - if you time the MGU-K recovery... show more

Marek Lubieniecki

1,425 subscribers

346,937 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie Autos & Fahrzeuge

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

When playing Death Stranding 2, you may find yourself asking, "What does it all mean?" Only way to find out is to keep on keepin' on 🐋🤔

When playing Death Stranding 2, you may find yourself asking, "What does it all mean?" Only way to find out is to keep on keepin' on 🐋🤔

PlayStation

364,861 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

When playing Death Stranding 2, you may find yourself asking, "What does it all mean?" Only way to find out is to keep on keepin' on 🐋🤔

When playing Death Stranding 2, you may find yourself asking, "What does it all mean?" Only way to find out is to keep on keepin' on 🐋🤔

PlayStation Europe

16,871 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Sorry if I did not answer many of you. I’ve never been a fan of the online eulogy. The immediate fallout is always about loved ones. And we should leave those closest be. And then I realised of course I was just incredibly upset, and a large digital outpouring is inevitable and testament to his character. My devastation came from having to watch it all unfold. From spending years trying to help and actually getting him close to a point where he almost had a normal life again - then being powerless to stop him doing things he should not have. Powerless in every sense as it also meant it sometimes not being my place to say anything. In the end watching some of the evil shits around enable the worst of it was too much for me, I had to step back it was too painful to watch. I told my mate who was filling in for me looking after him “ah I just need some space from it all, I’ll be back with him after Christmas” and then suddenly there was no Christmas. And it turned out no one was to blame, and I immediately looked to blame myself most of all, fearing the worst. But it was a simple accident in the end. A bolt out of the blue. So if you are ever estranged or overwhelmed by friends and family and think it will all be OK one day - DON’T put it off. Reach out now. Grab that person and hold them tight. There may not be a tomorrow. You might not be around to see them off. There may not be the grand luxury of time available you thought there was. He died in the arms of his beloved son, and that is a measure of comfort, if a passing can ever have any. He was my mentor, my friend and my glad burden. And there was nothing I would not do for him.

Sorry if I did not answer many of you. I’ve never been a fan of the online eulogy. The immediate fallout is always about loved ones. And we should leave those closest be. And then I realised of course I was just incredibly upset, and a large digital outpouring is inevitable and testament to his character. My devastation came from having to watch it all unfold. From spending years trying to help and actually getting him close to a point where he almost had a normal life again - then being powerless to stop him doing things he should not have. Powerless in every sense as it also meant it sometimes not being my place to say anything. In the end watching some of the evil shits around enable the worst of it was too much for me, I had to step back it was too painful to watch. I told my mate who was filling in for me looking after him “ah I just need some space from it all, I’ll be back with him after Christmas” and then suddenly there was no Christmas. And it turned out no one was to blame, and I immediately looked to blame myself most of all, fearing the worst. But it was a simple accident in the end. A bolt out of the blue. So if you are ever estranged or overwhelmed by friends and family and think it will all be OK one day - DON’T put it off. Reach out now. Grab that person and hold them tight. There may not be a tomorrow. You might not be around to see them off. There may not be the grand luxury of time available you thought there was. He died in the arms of his beloved son, and that is a measure of comfort, if a passing can ever have any. He was my mentor, my friend and my glad burden. And there was nothing I would not do for him.

The Secret DJ.

40,740 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“I came to realize something. the person that has been standing beside you through it all may actually be the person you were meant to find. I am not sure why I never noticed it was you the entire time.” 🥹

“I came to realize something. the person that has been standing beside you through it all may actually be the person you were meant to find. I am not sure why I never noticed it was you the entire time.” 🥹

juanita may 🤎

21,423 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Blown away by the love and support you all showed at my meet and greet! Thank you all from coming from all over the country to come out 🥰😍 I am beyond grateful 🥹 to say my heart is full is an understatement- thank you all for everything and for the support through the years!

Blown away by the love and support you all showed at my meet and greet! Thank you all from coming from all over the country to come out 🥰😍 I am beyond grateful 🥹 to say my heart is full is an understatement- thank you all for everything and for the support through the years!

Rachel Reilly

170,550 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

AJ Brown questions if the Earth may actually be flat: “Have you ever paid attention to rockets when they take off? I want you to look up rockets taking off, and see the angle it takes off at, and wonder why it never goes straight in the air.” AJ has previously come out as a moon-landing denier in the past. Thoughts? Or do you think he is kidding? 👀

AJ Brown questions if the Earth may actually be flat: “Have you ever paid attention to rockets when they take off? I want you to look up rockets taking off, and see the angle it takes off at, and wonder why it never goes straight in the air.” AJ has previously come out as a moon-landing denier in the past. Thoughts? Or do you think he is kidding? 👀

Eagles Nation

565,111 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Kellogg: Putin is on the losing end. If he does not watch out, he may end up like Nicholas II, the last tsar. Someone will get to him, and I think he is worried about that. 3/

Kellogg: Putin is on the losing end. If he does not watch out, he may end up like Nicholas II, the last tsar. Someone will get to him, and I think he is worried about that. 3/

Tymofiy Mylovanov

23,137 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

Dawah is deception. Why are you leaving out the context SeerahPro ? You know right after this he says he doesn’t remember well what he wrote in that entry on Muhaymin. Why leave that part out? He even goes on to say that section seems to be non-committal and he needs to go back and re-read it. So since you don’t want to show every one the full context, I’ll do it, and expose how you are lying now and lied in the debate. Sinai doesn’t help your claim that the Quran believes the previous scriptures were textually corrupted. He says he doesn’t think the Quran believes the previous scriptures were corrupted in the deep past and that they are unrecoverable (Clip 1). Now let’s look at the short clip you pulled in context (Clip 2). First, what he says does not affirm why you cited him to begin with, which is that the Quran is supposed to be a supreme authority and determine which parts of our scriptures are corrupt and which are not. In the very clip you pulled he says, “The Quran is claiming to be able to sort of determine the correct reading of these previous scriptures and to remedy misreading and misunderstandings.” So by arbiter he means it is not determining what parts of our scriptures are true or corrupted, it is only an arbiter in determining meaning. You just buried yourself by citing this, because you implied Sinai was saying the Quran is an arbiter for determining textual corruption, which he doesn’t say. It’s like you didn’t even pay attention to what you pulled. That is embarrassing. Second, right after this (in what you left out) the interviewer reminds him he entertained two possibilities in his book and was noncommittal. Sinai says he doesn’t remember what he said and was probably leaving open possibilities, which is what I already had to correct you on. If you go back to the book, once again, he said on page 707 essentially what I said, “Muhaymin, meanwhile, is derived from Syriac mhaymnā (or conceivably from its equivalent in some other form of Aramaic), a passive participle of the verb haymen and meaning ‘trustworthy, faithful, loyal.’” After this all he does in the book is mention other possibilities and the one you want is more contingent on non-canonical readings. But even if that interpretation is correct (which Sinai confirms in this interview is his view) it doesn’t help you, because you misunderstood what Sinai means by ‘arbiter.’ In Clip 3 he first says, “So I need to reread that entry. I guess it seems to be very non-committal.” But remember you said (Clip 4), “In his 'Key Terms of the Quran' he explicitly says that Muhaymin means the Quran is the arbiter of the contents.” That is incorrect. He did not explicitly say that. Why did you lie? In Clip 3 he goes on to say “But I think entrusted with authority can mean, authorized to sort of authoritatively interpret and determine especially theological significance.” So you don’t even understand what Sinai means by “arbiter.” He doesn’t mean what you mean, that the Quran is determining which parts of our scriptures are true and corrupted, but that it is an arbiter of meaning. The fact that you still do not see this means you are beyond delusional. You never should have cited Sinai because he doesn’t help you at all. The funny thing is we were already planning to go live tomorrow to review this interview because he doesn’t help you at all and unintentionally helps with the Islamic Dilemma.

Dawah is deception. Why are you leaving out the context SeerahPro ? You know right after this he says he doesn’t remember well what he wrote in that entry on Muhaymin. Why leave that part out? He even goes on to say that section seems to be non-committal and he needs to go back and re-read it. So since you don’t want to show every one the full context, I’ll do it, and expose how you are lying now and lied in the debate. Sinai doesn’t help your claim that the Quran believes the previous scriptures were textually corrupted. He says he doesn’t think the Quran believes the previous scriptures were corrupted in the deep past and that they are unrecoverable (Clip 1). Now let’s look at the short clip you pulled in context (Clip 2). First, what he says does not affirm why you cited him to begin with, which is that the Quran is supposed to be a supreme authority and determine which parts of our scriptures are corrupt and which are not. In the very clip you pulled he says, “The Quran is claiming to be able to sort of determine the correct reading of these previous scriptures and to remedy misreading and misunderstandings.” So by arbiter he means it is not determining what parts of our scriptures are true or corrupted, it is only an arbiter in determining meaning. You just buried yourself by citing this, because you implied Sinai was saying the Quran is an arbiter for determining textual corruption, which he doesn’t say. It’s like you didn’t even pay attention to what you pulled. That is embarrassing. Second, right after this (in what you left out) the interviewer reminds him he entertained two possibilities in his book and was noncommittal. Sinai says he doesn’t remember what he said and was probably leaving open possibilities, which is what I already had to correct you on. If you go back to the book, once again, he said on page 707 essentially what I said, “Muhaymin, meanwhile, is derived from Syriac mhaymnā (or conceivably from its equivalent in some other form of Aramaic), a passive participle of the verb haymen and meaning ‘trustworthy, faithful, loyal.’” After this all he does in the book is mention other possibilities and the one you want is more contingent on non-canonical readings. But even if that interpretation is correct (which Sinai confirms in this interview is his view) it doesn’t help you, because you misunderstood what Sinai means by ‘arbiter.’ In Clip 3 he first says, “So I need to reread that entry. I guess it seems to be very non-committal.” But remember you said (Clip 4), “In his 'Key Terms of the Quran' he explicitly says that Muhaymin means the Quran is the arbiter of the contents.” That is incorrect. He did not explicitly say that. Why did you lie? In Clip 3 he goes on to say “But I think entrusted with authority can mean, authorized to sort of authoritatively interpret and determine especially theological significance.” So you don’t even understand what Sinai means by “arbiter.” He doesn’t mean what you mean, that the Quran is determining which parts of our scriptures are true and corrupted, but that it is an arbiter of meaning. The fact that you still do not see this means you are beyond delusional. You never should have cited Sinai because he doesn’t help you at all. The funny thing is we were already planning to go live tomorrow to review this interview because he doesn’t help you at all and unintentionally helps with the Islamic Dilemma.

InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones

34,921 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

When it comes to quality, handmade Footwears, just give it up to Glow🩵 The brown one has gotten me ton of compliments that if I had a dollar for all the time someone liked it🤔… Just got the one with my feet (all thanks to a Kind Anon🙏🏿🥹🤍) and with the look of things, my feet is about to turn heads and not to forget I might need a piggy bank to save all dollars I will be getting from these compliments 🥳😉.

When it comes to quality, handmade Footwears, just give it up to Glow🩵 The brown one has gotten me ton of compliments that if I had a dollar for all the time someone liked it🤔… Just got the one with my feet (all thanks to a Kind Anon🙏🏿🥹🤍) and with the look of things, my feet is about to turn heads and not to forget I might need a piggy bank to save all dollars I will be getting from these compliments 🥳😉.

Boss Baby 🌚🌝

20,209 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The official unveiling of the brand new Specs Glasses from Snapchat $2195 Pre-order today at Release date : Fall 2026 4 hours of mixed usage battery life Up to 20 hours battery life with the case Apps and Games Cameras Built in speakers These glasses are completely hands-free and do not need to be connected to any devices. If you want to connect them to devices you can connect them to a computer or a phone or tablet and view the screen through the glasses. #specs #smartglasses #tech powered by Snapdragon #xrglasses

GregglesTV

30,811 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

“Listen to Black feminists.” You mean the people openly calling my death??? “It is time for Black men to face the consequences of their actions.” What does this mean???

“Listen to Black feminists.” You mean the people openly calling my death??? “It is time for Black men to face the consequences of their actions.” What does this mean???

Just Matt.

180,171 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“So much music nowadays is so like: ‘You don’t know me, I don’t need you...’ – and all the music then was kinda like: ‘I don’t care if you don’t love me, I will lie down in the road, pour my heart out and show it to you.’ – Do you know what I mean?” - Amy Winehouse, (2007).

“So much music nowadays is so like: ‘You don’t know me, I don’t need you...’ – and all the music then was kinda like: ‘I don’t care if you don’t love me, I will lie down in the road, pour my heart out and show it to you.’ – Do you know what I mean?” - Amy Winehouse, (2007).

🎸

422,408 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

I think something people miss about this scene is that Whitaker is NOT copying Robby’s lesson to the letter. Robby’s original advice was: “You learn to live with it, learn to accept it, and try to find balance if you can.” But that’s not quite what Whitaker says: “You try to accept it and try to find balance.” Key difference being that Robby’s lesson was to LEARN to accept it and live with it. But Whitaker says you have to TRY to accept it, because he still hasn’t found a way to accept death. It still hits him as hard as it did with Mr. Milton. He also completely omits learning to “live with it” because I think for Whitaker it’s something he rejects completely. He doesn’t want to “live with” the fact that people die.. he wants to PREVENT IT at all costs. The only thing Whitaker still agrees on is that you have to try and find balance. Something he continues to try to do. He can’t give the advice exactly because he hasn’t implemented it himself fully yet. I found that pretty interesting.

I think something people miss about this scene is that Whitaker is NOT copying Robby’s lesson to the letter. Robby’s original advice was: “You learn to live with it, learn to accept it, and try to find balance if you can.” But that’s not quite what Whitaker says: “You try to accept it and try to find balance.” Key difference being that Robby’s lesson was to LEARN to accept it and live with it. But Whitaker says you have to TRY to accept it, because he still hasn’t found a way to accept death. It still hits him as hard as it did with Mr. Milton. He also completely omits learning to “live with it” because I think for Whitaker it’s something he rejects completely. He doesn’t want to “live with” the fact that people die.. he wants to PREVENT IT at all costs. The only thing Whitaker still agrees on is that you have to try and find balance. Something he continues to try to do. He can’t give the advice exactly because he hasn’t implemented it himself fully yet. I found that pretty interesting.

🖤ViViANNE 🖤 the Pitt S2 Spoilers❗️

83,822 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Reporter: Are you ruling out troops on the ground to get Bagram back? Trump: We won’t talk about that. We are talking now to Afghanistan and we want it back and want it back soon, right away and if they don't, you are going to find out what I'm going to do

Reporter: Are you ruling out troops on the ground to get Bagram back? Trump: We won’t talk about that. We are talking now to Afghanistan and we want it back and want it back soon, right away and if they don't, you are going to find out what I'm going to do

Acyn

209,375 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Trump: "To keep peace, you really have to-- I have a thing. Strength ... through-- and I mean it. You really have it. You have strength. And you need the strength. But it's really peace through strength."

Trump: "To keep peace, you really have to-- I have a thing. Strength ... through-- and I mean it. You really have it. You have strength. And you need the strength. But it's really peace through strength."

Aaron Rupar

268,787 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I mean…what if he DID look back? At the end of the bridge, only to find out we were already out of sight…🥲 #caleb #loveanddeepspace #loveanddeepspacecaleb

I mean…what if he DID look back? At the end of the bridge, only to find out we were already out of sight…🥲 #caleb #loveanddeepspace #loveanddeepspacecaleb

盒装白鸟

30,213 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten