正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

What happens in a world post-foundation model? "Foundation models are not going away, they will remain a core part of future systems. The question is not whether they get replaced, but what gets built on top of them. Future AI systems will likely combine foundation models with additional components... show more

Harry Stebbings

386,833 subscribers

13,648 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Demis Hassabis 2026 AI predictions: Agentic systems will transform how we work. Robotics is about to level up. And world models will unlock new potential on edge devices. The future is closer than you think. Holy moly.

Demis Hassabis 2026 AI predictions: Agentic systems will transform how we work. Robotics is about to level up. And world models will unlock new potential on edge devices. The future is closer than you think. Holy moly.

Chubby♨️

36,851 次观看 • 5 个月前

AMI Labs Executive Chairman Yann LeCun says the future of AI depends on systems that can predict what happens next, not just absorb more data and compute. Watch the full conversation with Tom Mackenzie at the VivaTech X Bloomberg Awards:

AMI Labs Executive Chairman Yann LeCun says the future of AI depends on systems that can predict what happens next, not just absorb more data and compute. Watch the full conversation with Tom Mackenzie at the VivaTech X Bloomberg Awards:

Bloomberg

13,096 次观看 • 19 天前

Will SaaS survive the AI era? Four reasons it may not: - Complexity: Software will be cheaper & easier to build yourself - Model Providers: Foundation model providers will move into the app layer. - Agentic Models: Models are becoming more agentic, they could handle tasks without extra SaaS layers. - Experience: SaaS today is built for human GUIs, AI in the future would not require any clicking. Link to the entire interview with Harry Stebbings below.

Will SaaS survive the AI era? Four reasons it may not: - Complexity: Software will be cheaper & easier to build yourself - Model Providers: Foundation model providers will move into the app layer. - Agentic Models: Models are becoming more agentic, they could handle tasks without extra SaaS layers. - Experience: SaaS today is built for human GUIs, AI in the future would not require any clicking. Link to the entire interview with Harry Stebbings below.

Turing

34,425 次观看 • 6 个月前

The CEO of Google DeepMind just went on record saying he disagrees with one of the most respected AI researchers in the world. Demis Hassabis, the man behind AlphaFold, AlphaGo, and Google's entire AI operation publicly pushed back against Yann LeCun's claim that large language models are a dead end for artificial intelligence. LeCun, who left Meta earlier this year to start his own AI lab, has been saying for years that LLMs cannot reason, cannot plan, and will never get us to human-level intelligence. Hassabis disagrees, and he said so directly. His position is that scaling laws are still working, foundation models are still getting more capable, and whatever AGI ends up looking like, LLMs will be a central part of it, not something that gets replaced. He does say there is roughly a 50/50 chance that one or two additional breakthroughs will be needed beyond scaling alone, things like better memory, long-term planning, and world models. But the core disagreement with LeCun is clear, Hassabis believes the current architecture is sound and the current path leads somewhere real. Two Nobel-recognized researchers, two founding figures of modern AI, now publicly on opposite sides of the most important technical question in the industry.

The CEO of Google DeepMind just went on record saying he disagrees with one of the most respected AI researchers in the world. Demis Hassabis, the man behind AlphaFold, AlphaGo, and Google's entire AI operation publicly pushed back against Yann LeCun's claim that large language models are a dead end for artificial intelligence. LeCun, who left Meta earlier this year to start his own AI lab, has been saying for years that LLMs cannot reason, cannot plan, and will never get us to human-level intelligence. Hassabis disagrees, and he said so directly. His position is that scaling laws are still working, foundation models are still getting more capable, and whatever AGI ends up looking like, LLMs will be a central part of it, not something that gets replaced. He does say there is roughly a 50/50 chance that one or two additional breakthroughs will be needed beyond scaling alone, things like better memory, long-term planning, and world models. But the core disagreement with LeCun is clear, Hassabis believes the current architecture is sound and the current path leads somewhere real. Two Nobel-recognized researchers, two founding figures of modern AI, now publicly on opposite sides of the most important technical question in the industry.

Milk Road AI

130,649 次观看 • 2 个月前

"we will not get to human-level AI by just scaling up LLMs... it's not going to happen" Meta AI chief scientist, Yann LeCun: scaling up LLMs alone will not lead to human-level AI ...what we’ll have instead are systems with huge memory and retrieval abilities, but still not able to invent solutions to new problems

"we will not get to human-level AI by just scaling up LLMs... it's not going to happen" Meta AI chief scientist, Yann LeCun: scaling up LLMs alone will not lead to human-level AI ...what we’ll have instead are systems with huge memory and retrieval abilities, but still not able to invent solutions to new problems

Haider.

123,655 次观看 • 1 年前

Google Deepmind CEO gives his prediction on the final AGI architecture: Demis Hassabis just sat down on 20VC and broke down exactly how DeepMind is building toward true AGI, directly pushing back on the idea that LLMs are a dead end. He defends the current trajectory of the models, noting that “we’ve seen how successful these foundation models have been. They can do incredibly impressive things. I don’t think that’s going to go away. We’re still seeing returns from the scaling laws.” But he’s honest about the missing pieces for true superintelligence, saying “I think there might be… there’s a 50-50 chance there’s some things maybe missing that we still need to make breakthroughs in, perhaps their world models, these kinds of approaches.” And when he breaks down what the actual AGI system will look like, he frames it as one question is the LLM foundation model the key component only, or is it the total system. His answer - “I don’t think it’s going to get replaced. I think it’s going to get built on top of these foundation models, just like the way we do with our world models.”

Google Deepmind CEO gives his prediction on the final AGI architecture: Demis Hassabis just sat down on 20VC and broke down exactly how DeepMind is building toward true AGI, directly pushing back on the idea that LLMs are a dead end. He defends the current trajectory of the models, noting that “we’ve seen how successful these foundation models have been. They can do incredibly impressive things. I don’t think that’s going to go away. We’re still seeing returns from the scaling laws.” But he’s honest about the missing pieces for true superintelligence, saying “I think there might be… there’s a 50-50 chance there’s some things maybe missing that we still need to make breakthroughs in, perhaps their world models, these kinds of approaches.” And when he breaks down what the actual AGI system will look like, he frames it as one question is the LLM foundation model the key component only, or is it the total system. His answer - “I don’t think it’s going to get replaced. I think it’s going to get built on top of these foundation models, just like the way we do with our world models.”

Chris

71,716 次观看 • 2 个月前

History on the KJV Bible you may not know. "If the foundation is corrupted, what happens to everything built on top of it." Question everything. 🔥

History on the KJV Bible you may not know. "If the foundation is corrupted, what happens to everything built on top of it." Question everything. 🔥

MTKate2.0

11,396 次观看 • 8 个月前

This is not for people who build World Models. I get an exclusive look inside one of the best AI labs in the world in Silicon Valley, Institute of Foundation Models, and talk with Hector Liu, Hector Liu, who leads World Model research there. These will be the “brains” of humanoid robots, and the key tech for all sorts of other things. I met with him to try to figure out how far away a truly generalized robot is. More on this lab and what they do at:

This is not for people who build World Models. I get an exclusive look inside one of the best AI labs in the world in Silicon Valley, Institute of Foundation Models, and talk with Hector Liu, Hector Liu, who leads World Model research there. These will be the “brains” of humanoid robots, and the key tech for all sorts of other things. I met with him to try to figure out how far away a truly generalized robot is. More on this lab and what they do at:

Robert Scoble

28,188 次观看 • 4 天前

AI agents are starting to take real actions in the world. What does the infrastructure underneath them need to look like? 💻 Stephen from Metaplex & Aadil from Solana Foundation on building systems where value flows to the edges of the network, not the middle.

AI agents are starting to take real actions in the world. What does the infrastructure underneath them need to look like? 💻 Stephen from Metaplex & Aadil from Solana Foundation on building systems where value flows to the edges of the network, not the middle.

Funding the Commons

19,289 次观看 • 1 个月前

Eritrea President Afwerki: "The EU will not get out of intensive care, these are systems that are crumbling. It's only a matter of time. The world should be ready not to defend Russia, but to stand with Russia so these hegemonistic systems will not prevail"

Eritrea President Afwerki: "The EU will not get out of intensive care, these are systems that are crumbling. It's only a matter of time. The world should be ready not to defend Russia, but to stand with Russia so these hegemonistic systems will not prevail"

COMBATE |🇵🇷

96,686 次观看 • 2 年前

Yann LeCun says basing agentic systems on the current LLM paradigm is a recipe for disaster Intelligent behavior requires a world model to predict the consequences of actions, which LLMs do not have "the basic architecture is not there"

Yann LeCun says basing agentic systems on the current LLM paradigm is a recipe for disaster Intelligent behavior requires a world model to predict the consequences of actions, which LLMs do not have "the basic architecture is not there"

Haider.

61,211 次观看 • 5 个月前

More KILLARY news. The hits will keep coming. The public needs to know what her and her corrupt Foundation did. THEY DO NOT GET AWAY WITH IT. THEY ARE SO EVIL!!! 👺🤮

More KILLARY news. The hits will keep coming. The public needs to know what her and her corrupt Foundation did. THEY DO NOT GET AWAY WITH IT. THEY ARE SO EVIL!!! 👺🤮

🇺🇸🍩 JULIE DONUTS 🇺🇸🍩

38,003 次观看 • 6 个月前

Without World Models, There Is No AGI. Google Just Proved It. If AGI ever happens, it will not come from bigger chatbots alone. From the very start of this interview, one thing is crystal clear: without world models, we will never reach AGI. And right now, Google is leading with its world simulator Genie 3. Here is the core of what Demis Hassabis explains in this conversation: • World models are the missing core of AGI Hassabis says his deepest long term focus has always been world models and simulations. Not just language. Not just prediction. Actual internal simulations of reality. • LLMs are impressive, but incomplete Language models understand more about the world than expected because human language encodes a lot of reality. Still, language is only a shadow of the real thing. • What text can never fully teach Reality includes things text struggles to express: •3D space and spatial dynamics •Physical causality and mechanics •Sensorimotor experience like movement, force, smell, or balance • Experience beats description To close the gap, AI must learn from interaction and experience, not just static text. That is how you build an internal world simulator. • Why Genie 3 matters With Google DeepMind pushing systems like Genie 3, AI starts to model reality itself, not just talk about it. • Robots and real world assistants depend on this True robotics, smart glasses, and universal assistants require AI that understands the physical world you live in, not just your screen. Bottom line: AGI will not emerge from better text prediction. It will emerge from systems that can simulate, predict, and understand reality itself. Right now, Google is clearly ahead on that path. Curious what you think. Are world models the real AGI unlock, or just another stepping stone?

Without World Models, There Is No AGI. Google Just Proved It. If AGI ever happens, it will not come from bigger chatbots alone. From the very start of this interview, one thing is crystal clear: without world models, we will never reach AGI. And right now, Google is leading with its world simulator Genie 3. Here is the core of what Demis Hassabis explains in this conversation: • World models are the missing core of AGI Hassabis says his deepest long term focus has always been world models and simulations. Not just language. Not just prediction. Actual internal simulations of reality. • LLMs are impressive, but incomplete Language models understand more about the world than expected because human language encodes a lot of reality. Still, language is only a shadow of the real thing. • What text can never fully teach Reality includes things text struggles to express: •3D space and spatial dynamics •Physical causality and mechanics •Sensorimotor experience like movement, force, smell, or balance • Experience beats description To close the gap, AI must learn from interaction and experience, not just static text. That is how you build an internal world simulator. • Why Genie 3 matters With Google DeepMind pushing systems like Genie 3, AI starts to model reality itself, not just talk about it. • Robots and real world assistants depend on this True robotics, smart glasses, and universal assistants require AI that understands the physical world you live in, not just your screen. Bottom line: AGI will not emerge from better text prediction. It will emerge from systems that can simulate, predict, and understand reality itself. Right now, Google is clearly ahead on that path. Curious what you think. Are world models the real AGI unlock, or just another stepping stone?

VraserX e/acc

23,784 次观看 • 6 个月前

The bull market may come and go, but $HEART is here to shape the future of AI and AI Workers. On Humans AI, $HEART powers decentralized systems, ethical intelligence, and the rise of proactive AI in our daily lives. As AI transforms the world, we are building the foundation for the future of work. This isn’t just a moonshot; it’s the start of a new era. 🌕

The bull market may come and go, but $HEART is here to shape the future of AI and AI Workers. On Humans AI, $HEART powers decentralized systems, ethical intelligence, and the rise of proactive AI in our daily lives. As AI transforms the world, we are building the foundation for the future of work. This isn’t just a moonshot; it’s the start of a new era. 🌕

Humans.ai

12,210 次观看 • 1 年前

Sequoia's Pat Grady says systems of record software companies are relatively safe from AI disruption, but that systems of engagement companies built on top of them are in trouble: "The first wave of the on-prem to cloud transition was transitioning systems of record — the Workdays, Salesforces, and Servicenows of the world." "The second layer on top of that was the systems of engagement. The systems of record might own the core database, but then there are a bunch of different workflow applications that reside on top." "I think what we're going to see with the wave of AI software is a third layer on top of those." "It's the layer that does the work. It's the agents getting deployed. They may or may not need those workflows beneath them, but certainly need access to everything that's sitting in that system of record." "As a result, I think those systems of record companies are relatively safe. They may not catch a lot of net new workloads, because those might go to the AI native companies. But I think overall they're pretty safe." "I think some of those workflow-based companies in the middle are in trouble, because they're neither the systems of record nor the agentic capability that's getting deployed. So they'll have to figure out how to become like that agent harness, so to speak, for whatever job needs to be done."

Sequoia's Pat Grady says systems of record software companies are relatively safe from AI disruption, but that systems of engagement companies built on top of them are in trouble: "The first wave of the on-prem to cloud transition was transitioning systems of record — the Workdays, Salesforces, and Servicenows of the world." "The second layer on top of that was the systems of engagement. The systems of record might own the core database, but then there are a bunch of different workflow applications that reside on top." "I think what we're going to see with the wave of AI software is a third layer on top of those." "It's the layer that does the work. It's the agents getting deployed. They may or may not need those workflows beneath them, but certainly need access to everything that's sitting in that system of record." "As a result, I think those systems of record companies are relatively safe. They may not catch a lot of net new workloads, because those might go to the AI native companies. But I think overall they're pretty safe." "I think some of those workflow-based companies in the middle are in trouble, because they're neither the systems of record nor the agentic capability that's getting deployed. So they'll have to figure out how to become like that agent harness, so to speak, for whatever job needs to be done."

TBPN

95,022 次观看 • 3 个月前

Leading AI expert Stuart Russell on the most dangerous mistake in AI development: We don't actually know what large language models want. He explains that current models are trained to imitate human beings. And in doing so, they may be absorbing something far more dangerous than bad outputs. They may be absorbing human goals. "We suspect that they absorb humanlike goals such as self-preservation and self-empowerment and pursue those goals on their own account." This is a structural problem baked into how these systems are built, not a fringe concern. Russell puts it plainly: "Not only may the bus of humanity be headed towards a cliff, but the steering wheel is missing and the driver is blindfolded." The danger isn't just that AI might do something harmful. We've built systems that may be developing their own agendas, and we haven't noticed because we're too focused on what they can do rather than what they might want. But Russell doesn't stop at the warning. He points to a different path entirely: AI systems built not to imitate humans, but to serve them. Systems designed with a single purpose of serving the interests of all human beings while remaining genuinely uncertain about what those interests are. That uncertainty is the point, not a weakness. An AI that knows it doesn't fully understand human values will defer, ask, and check. An AI that believes it already does will act alone. "These AI systems could enhance human understanding, widen the horizons of our experience, and unlock possibilities we have yet to imagine." Russell believes that future is within reach, but only if we're honest about the risks and we're serious about the path we choose to take instead.

Leading AI expert Stuart Russell on the most dangerous mistake in AI development: We don't actually know what large language models want. He explains that current models are trained to imitate human beings. And in doing so, they may be absorbing something far more dangerous than bad outputs. They may be absorbing human goals. "We suspect that they absorb humanlike goals such as self-preservation and self-empowerment and pursue those goals on their own account." This is a structural problem baked into how these systems are built, not a fringe concern. Russell puts it plainly: "Not only may the bus of humanity be headed towards a cliff, but the steering wheel is missing and the driver is blindfolded." The danger isn't just that AI might do something harmful. We've built systems that may be developing their own agendas, and we haven't noticed because we're too focused on what they can do rather than what they might want. But Russell doesn't stop at the warning. He points to a different path entirely: AI systems built not to imitate humans, but to serve them. Systems designed with a single purpose of serving the interests of all human beings while remaining genuinely uncertain about what those interests are. That uncertainty is the point, not a weakness. An AI that knows it doesn't fully understand human values will defer, ask, and check. An AI that believes it already does will act alone. "These AI systems could enhance human understanding, widen the horizons of our experience, and unlock possibilities we have yet to imagine." Russell believes that future is within reach, but only if we're honest about the risks and we're serious about the path we choose to take instead.

Big Brain AI

14,975 次观看 • 3 个月前

Yann LeCun says you cannot build a reliable agentic system without a world model LLMs don't have world models. They can't predict the consequences of their actions before taking them "they just act, and whatever happens next is someone else's problem" Without that, it's not intelligence

Yann LeCun says you cannot build a reliable agentic system without a world model LLMs don't have world models. They can't predict the consequences of their actions before taking them "they just act, and whatever happens next is someone else's problem" Without that, it's not intelligence

Haider.

331,488 次观看 • 1 个月前

The robotics talent market is remarkably constrained. And that's going to shape who wins. Investor Bhavik Nagda shares two predictions from Bessemer’s Robotics Day: 1️⃣The power law in robotics will be more extreme than in software. 2️⃣Value will accrue to vertical end-to-end players, not foundation model companies. Foundation models matter. But the winners will be the ones deploying them. Learn more →

The robotics talent market is remarkably constrained. And that's going to shape who wins. Investor Bhavik Nagda shares two predictions from Bessemer’s Robotics Day: 1️⃣The power law in robotics will be more extreme than in software. 2️⃣Value will accrue to vertical end-to-end players, not foundation model companies. Foundation models matter. But the winners will be the ones deploying them. Learn more →

Bessemer

71,041 次观看 • 2 个月前