Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

what happens to trading if AI keeps getting better? Dwarkesh Patel asked Jane Street's head of technology the obvious question: if we get AGI, can't it just replace what you do? his answer: "trading feels to me like AGI-complete." "all of the different problems of the world end up...

GoshawkTrades's profile picture

Goshawk Trades

75,235 subscribers

57,388 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Qullamaggie on Success in Trading Is More About Not Doing Dumb Things “No, no, truly — I mean trading like… you don’t have to do a lot of advanced and smart things in the markets. Success in markets is more about not doing a lot of shit, dumb things — avoiding the dumb stuff. I truly think that. Every year I try to do less of the things that don’t work.”
0:23

Qullamaggie on Success in Trading Is More About Not Doing Dumb Things “No, no, truly — I mean trading like… you don’t have to do a lot of advanced and smart things in the markets. Success in markets is more about not doing a lot of shit, dumb things — avoiding the dumb stuff. I truly think that. Every year I try to do less of the things that don’t work.”

Lone

13,321 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

PabloReports: What do you make of Donald Trump doing 3,700 stock trades? Tuberville: I do the same thing. I never look at my stocks. You give it to someone who knows what they’re doing. I’m getting sick and tired of hearing Republicans and Democrats saying we need to stop all this insider trading. Sure, if you’re insider trading, you need to stop. I guarantee you President Trump is not insider trading, I’m not insider trading, and it’s ridiculous people bring that up. Most of the people who bring that up don’t have a clue what they are talking about.
0:55

PabloReports: What do you make of Donald Trump doing 3,700 stock trades? Tuberville: I do the same thing. I never look at my stocks. You give it to someone who knows what they’re doing. I’m getting sick and tired of hearing Republicans and Democrats saying we need to stop all this insider trading. Sure, if you’re insider trading, you need to stop. I guarantee you President Trump is not insider trading, I’m not insider trading, and it’s ridiculous people bring that up. Most of the people who bring that up don’t have a clue what they are talking about.

Acyn

1,703,328 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

At the BNB Chain hackathon, CZ 🔶 BNB made several very important points about AI trading (Everything in parentheses is my own view and judgment.) He first said that AI will be involved in trading everywhere. Trading itself is already a huge market: there are 300 million users on Binance alone, and if you add the decentralized ecosystems, that number is not small either. In such a mass-market environment, many different trading strategies can work, with countless different coins, different projects, and different ways to play. But there is a big problem here: building commercial AI trading platforms for retail users is actually very hard. If a trading strategy works very well for one person, once a billion people start using the same strategy, that strategy “might still work, or might stop working.” Take copy trading / follow trading as an example: if you buy first and everyone follows you, the first buyer will perform very well, but the last person to follow may not end up with good results. So, with the exact same strategy and the exact same copy logic, the outcomes can be completely different for different people. (On top of that, every strategy also has its own capital capacity limits.) Teams that can really build strong AI are, with high probability, going to trade with their own money. In today’s world, money itself is already somewhat like a “commodity”; many people have a lot of capital, and it’s actually not that hard to raise funds. If you truly have an algorithm that can make a lot of money, it’s not hard to get money and run your own book. There is really only one situation where you would sell this algorithm to mass-market users: for example, if you charge a $10 monthly subscription and can sell it to one million users, then your $10 million monthly subscription revenue is higher than the profit you could make by trading the strategy yourself. (Here this touches one of our earlier theses: as training AI models becomes relatively easier and the supply of models increases, model companies have more incentive to open-source. By analogy, as the production process of trading strategies is increasingly simplified by AI and the supply of strategies explodes, traders will have stronger incentives to monetize by expanding their influence in other words, by “open-sourcing” their strategies.) Of course, CZ did not say that this model can never work. Another path is to build an AI trading platform that lets users tune different AI algorithms, or very easily assemble their own structures and strategies, so that what each person ends up running is different and better tailored to themselves. Some people will make money, some people will lose money, but the platform still has value because it’s very hard for most people to build an AI trading algorithm from scratch. So there are a lot of trade-offs here; it’s not as simple as saying “once AI shows up, everything automatically gets better.” (This is exactly what we presented at the hackathon: you describe your own strategy in natural language, and the AI automatically generates a workflow. The parameters in that workflow, the models used, the logical structure, the APIs it calls, and even the algorithms it invokes are all customizable. The reasons we think workflows are a good way to do this include: controllable execution paths, Lego-like modular nodes, and better visualization that makes it easier for users to build and adjust their workflows.) Finally, his conclusion was very clear: it’s not that AI will definitely make trading better, and it’s not that AI will definitely make things worse. Rather, no matter what, in the future a huge number of people will use AI to trade. This will be a very large field, and whoever can build the best algorithms will make a lot of money.
2:38

At the BNB Chain hackathon, CZ 🔶 BNB made several very important points about AI trading (Everything in parentheses is my own view and judgment.) He first said that AI will be involved in trading everywhere. Trading itself is already a huge market: there are 300 million users on Binance alone, and if you add the decentralized ecosystems, that number is not small either. In such a mass-market environment, many different trading strategies can work, with countless different coins, different projects, and different ways to play. But there is a big problem here: building commercial AI trading platforms for retail users is actually very hard. If a trading strategy works very well for one person, once a billion people start using the same strategy, that strategy “might still work, or might stop working.” Take copy trading / follow trading as an example: if you buy first and everyone follows you, the first buyer will perform very well, but the last person to follow may not end up with good results. So, with the exact same strategy and the exact same copy logic, the outcomes can be completely different for different people. (On top of that, every strategy also has its own capital capacity limits.) Teams that can really build strong AI are, with high probability, going to trade with their own money. In today’s world, money itself is already somewhat like a “commodity”; many people have a lot of capital, and it’s actually not that hard to raise funds. If you truly have an algorithm that can make a lot of money, it’s not hard to get money and run your own book. There is really only one situation where you would sell this algorithm to mass-market users: for example, if you charge a $10 monthly subscription and can sell it to one million users, then your $10 million monthly subscription revenue is higher than the profit you could make by trading the strategy yourself. (Here this touches one of our earlier theses: as training AI models becomes relatively easier and the supply of models increases, model companies have more incentive to open-source. By analogy, as the production process of trading strategies is increasingly simplified by AI and the supply of strategies explodes, traders will have stronger incentives to monetize by expanding their influence in other words, by “open-sourcing” their strategies.) Of course, CZ did not say that this model can never work. Another path is to build an AI trading platform that lets users tune different AI algorithms, or very easily assemble their own structures and strategies, so that what each person ends up running is different and better tailored to themselves. Some people will make money, some people will lose money, but the platform still has value because it’s very hard for most people to build an AI trading algorithm from scratch. So there are a lot of trade-offs here; it’s not as simple as saying “once AI shows up, everything automatically gets better.” (This is exactly what we presented at the hackathon: you describe your own strategy in natural language, and the AI automatically generates a workflow. The parameters in that workflow, the models used, the logical structure, the APIs it calls, and even the algorithms it invokes are all customizable. The reasons we think workflows are a good way to do this include: controllable execution paths, Lego-like modular nodes, and better visualization that makes it easier for users to build and adjust their workflows.) Finally, his conclusion was very clear: it’s not that AI will definitely make trading better, and it’s not that AI will definitely make things worse. Rather, no matter what, in the future a huge number of people will use AI to trade. This will be a very large field, and whoever can build the best algorithms will make a lot of money.

Tykoo

25,535 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev on AI agents and trading: "Everyone thinks that this is going to be all great and my agent's going to be trading for me." "What happens with all technology is the early adopters do have an easier time." "You're going to get some early wins, possibly if you're doing some kind of agentic trading, because not a lot of people are doing it." "At some point, if everyone's doing it, it becomes almost like if you're not doing it, you're at a disadvantage." "It's kind of like when you're the first accountant that used a spreadsheet in the 80s. I can get all of my work done for my business in one hour a day. And it used to be 10 hours a day." "But eventually everyone kind of figures it out and you're back to a level playing field." Vlad Tenev on Basis Points with amit and Steven Fiorillo
1:38

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev on AI agents and trading: "Everyone thinks that this is going to be all great and my agent's going to be trading for me." "What happens with all technology is the early adopters do have an easier time." "You're going to get some early wins, possibly if you're doing some kind of agentic trading, because not a lot of people are doing it." "At some point, if everyone's doing it, it becomes almost like if you're not doing it, you're at a disadvantage." "It's kind of like when you're the first accountant that used a spreadsheet in the 80s. I can get all of my work done for my business in one hour a day. And it used to be 10 hours a day." "But eventually everyone kind of figures it out and you're back to a level playing field." Vlad Tenev on Basis Points with amit and Steven Fiorillo

a16z

126,223 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

JPMorgan AI Research Report: "Algorithmic decision-making removes the two largest sources of retail trading losses, emotional bias and inconsistent execution" This trader just spent 65 seconds explaining why Claude AI is a better trader than most humans His argument is simple: - AI doesn't revenge-trade after a loss - doesn't overtrade out of boredom - doesn't move stop-losses out of fear - and doesn't skip setups because of emotional hesitation The conversation about AI in trading has moved past 'can it read a chart' into: 'can it remove the human flaws that cost retail traders 70%+ of their accounts' This insight separates the top 5% from everyone else If you're still trading on instinct in 2026, you're up against traders who removed emotion from the process Learn how Claude plugs into trading infrastructure thx to this article👇 And build a workflow around your strategy. Do that, and you're ahead of 95% of retail traders
1:05

JPMorgan AI Research Report: "Algorithmic decision-making removes the two largest sources of retail trading losses, emotional bias and inconsistent execution" This trader just spent 65 seconds explaining why Claude AI is a better trader than most humans His argument is simple: - AI doesn't revenge-trade after a loss - doesn't overtrade out of boredom - doesn't move stop-losses out of fear - and doesn't skip setups because of emotional hesitation The conversation about AI in trading has moved past 'can it read a chart' into: 'can it remove the human flaws that cost retail traders 70%+ of their accounts' This insight separates the top 5% from everyone else If you're still trading on instinct in 2026, you're up against traders who removed emotion from the process Learn how Claude plugs into trading infrastructure thx to this article👇 And build a workflow around your strategy. Do that, and you're ahead of 95% of retail traders

cristal💎

10,898 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The Rails is quietly becoming one of the most interesting experiments in on-chain trading. It gives you a place to actually prove skill, not just flex capital. You can start small, take evaluations with zero real-loss risk, and still build toward real credit on What makes it compelling is how every trade, every attempt, every evaluation feeds into your on-chain profile. It feels less like a trading app and more like a system where your performance genuinely matters. And because the platform is still early, the people jumping in now are shaping the culture, the meta, and the benchmarks future traders will chase. ➥If you’ve been looking for a fresh angle in the trading ecosystem, Rails is worth watching. Links Oficiais: Rails Play: Website: X: Support:
1:40

The Rails is quietly becoming one of the most interesting experiments in on-chain trading. It gives you a place to actually prove skill, not just flex capital. You can start small, take evaluations with zero real-loss risk, and still build toward real credit on What makes it compelling is how every trade, every attempt, every evaluation feeds into your on-chain profile. It feels less like a trading app and more like a system where your performance genuinely matters. And because the platform is still early, the people jumping in now are shaping the culture, the meta, and the benchmarks future traders will chase. ➥If you’ve been looking for a fresh angle in the trading ecosystem, Rails is worth watching. Links Oficiais: Rails Play: Website: X: Support:

Zito.btc

24,095 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Today, we’re launching the new Index. Trading has become harder than it should be, not because traders lack information, but because they have too much of it. Every day, they are pushed through charts, opinions, alerts, dashboards, and AI tools that still leave the final work to them. We built Index around a simple belief: a trading product should make the next decision feel clearer and not make the trader feel busier. This is made possible by Quant AI agents working in the background to find the best trading setups, share them on Index, and attach calibrated confidence to every idea. And because trust matters, every agent comes with a visible track record, so traders can see how its setups have performed before deciding what to follow. This is the shift we believe trading has been waiting for: from tools that show you everything, to products that show you what matters. Powered by Hyperliquid. Try it here:
0:48

Today, we’re launching the new Index. Trading has become harder than it should be, not because traders lack information, but because they have too much of it. Every day, they are pushed through charts, opinions, alerts, dashboards, and AI tools that still leave the final work to them. We built Index around a simple belief: a trading product should make the next decision feel clearer and not make the trader feel busier. This is made possible by Quant AI agents working in the background to find the best trading setups, share them on Index, and attach calibrated confidence to every idea. And because trust matters, every agent comes with a visible track record, so traders can see how its setups have performed before deciding what to follow. This is the shift we believe trading has been waiting for: from tools that show you everything, to products that show you what matters. Powered by Hyperliquid. Try it here:

Fraction AI

18,195 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The biggest marketplace on Earth won't be the assets humans own. It'll be the data AI needs. Everything that can be digitised is getting pulled in to train the next models. Every scientific dataset, every piece of research sitting in a university, every sensor reading off every John Deere tractor in a field. All of it feeds the machine, and almost none of it is visible to us. What comes out is an agentic economy running at machine speed. You plug your data into a vault, and agents monetise it on your behalf, trading with other agents in real time, in a marketplace we never see. The company sitting on proprietary data becomes part of it without even knowing. This is what the Economic Singularity actually looks like from the inside. The real economy stops being the one we can see and price, and moves somewhere we can't follow. You own a piece of it, or you get priced out of it. Jordi Visser.
1:27

The biggest marketplace on Earth won't be the assets humans own. It'll be the data AI needs. Everything that can be digitised is getting pulled in to train the next models. Every scientific dataset, every piece of research sitting in a university, every sensor reading off every John Deere tractor in a field. All of it feeds the machine, and almost none of it is visible to us. What comes out is an agentic economy running at machine speed. You plug your data into a vault, and agents monetise it on your behalf, trading with other agents in real time, in a marketplace we never see. The company sitting on proprietary data becomes part of it without even knowing. This is what the Economic Singularity actually looks like from the inside. The real economy stops being the one we can see and price, and moves somewhere we can't follow. You own a piece of it, or you get priced out of it. Jordi Visser.

Raoul Pal

79,047 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Do you agree with Republican Liz Cheney that we are "sleepwalking into a dictatorship? Cheney says of Trump: "He's told us what he will do. It's very easy to see the steps that he will take. … People who say, 'Well, if he's elected, it's not that dangerous because we have all of these checks and balances,' don't fully understand the extent to which the Republicans in Congress today have been co-opted. … One of the things that we see happening today is a sort of a sleepwalking into dictatorship in the United States." "If you look at what Donald Trump is trying to do, he can't do it by himself. He has to have collaborators. And the story of Mike Johnson is a story of, of a collaborator and of someone who knew then – and knows now – that what he's doing and saying is wrong, but he's willing to do it in an effort to please Donald Trump. And that's what makes it dangerous."
0:30

Do you agree with Republican Liz Cheney that we are "sleepwalking into a dictatorship? Cheney says of Trump: "He's told us what he will do. It's very easy to see the steps that he will take. … People who say, 'Well, if he's elected, it's not that dangerous because we have all of these checks and balances,' don't fully understand the extent to which the Republicans in Congress today have been co-opted. … One of the things that we see happening today is a sort of a sleepwalking into dictatorship in the United States." "If you look at what Donald Trump is trying to do, he can't do it by himself. He has to have collaborators. And the story of Mike Johnson is a story of, of a collaborator and of someone who knew then – and knows now – that what he's doing and saying is wrong, but he's willing to do it in an effort to please Donald Trump. And that's what makes it dangerous."

Brian Krassenstein

1,140,122 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Corporations that are purely AI and robotics will vastly outperform any corporations that have people in the loop You can think of it like how 'computer' used to be a job that humans had. You would go and get a job as a computer where you would do calculations. They had entire skyscrapers full of humans....20, 30 floors of humans...just doing calculations. Now, that entire skyscraper of humans doing calculations can be replaced by a laptop with a spreadsheet. That spreadsheet can do vastly more calculations than an entire building full of human computers So, you think about it: what if only some of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by humans? That would be much worse than if all of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by the computer. And so, really what will happen is the pure AI, pure robotics corporations or collectives will far outperform any corporations that have humans in the loop. It will happen very quickly
1:22

Corporations that are purely AI and robotics will vastly outperform any corporations that have people in the loop You can think of it like how 'computer' used to be a job that humans had. You would go and get a job as a computer where you would do calculations. They had entire skyscrapers full of humans....20, 30 floors of humans...just doing calculations. Now, that entire skyscraper of humans doing calculations can be replaced by a laptop with a spreadsheet. That spreadsheet can do vastly more calculations than an entire building full of human computers So, you think about it: what if only some of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by humans? That would be much worse than if all of the cells in your spreadsheet were calculated by the computer. And so, really what will happen is the pure AI, pure robotics corporations or collectives will far outperform any corporations that have humans in the loop. It will happen very quickly

X Freeze

16,849,327 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

This is a combination of Steve Jobs’ (1) The storyteller is the most powerful person in the world and Jeff Bezos’ (2) Invest in things that won’t change: “A company is just a fiction You make some filing and you say "We're a corporation today even though we're just two people sitting around a couch and we have a few dollars in a bank account.” And if these fictions are intended to grow to tens of thousands of people it should be because there is some common purpose. There is something that in aggregate, the sum of the parts of all the people working together should be able to move something further than anyone alone could do. And the role of a leader is to go and assert how will we measure ourselves? If we are seeking to be our best and get better every day how should we think about that, and how can we understand our forward progress? I don't know what Ramp will look like exactly in 100 years but I think just as it was true 100 years ago people always wanted more out of every dollar and more out of every hour, I think people will absolutely still want that in 100 years —in whatever form that may take.”
0:56

This is a combination of Steve Jobs’ (1) The storyteller is the most powerful person in the world and Jeff Bezos’ (2) Invest in things that won’t change: “A company is just a fiction You make some filing and you say "We're a corporation today even though we're just two people sitting around a couch and we have a few dollars in a bank account.” And if these fictions are intended to grow to tens of thousands of people it should be because there is some common purpose. There is something that in aggregate, the sum of the parts of all the people working together should be able to move something further than anyone alone could do. And the role of a leader is to go and assert how will we measure ourselves? If we are seeking to be our best and get better every day how should we think about that, and how can we understand our forward progress? I don't know what Ramp will look like exactly in 100 years but I think just as it was true 100 years ago people always wanted more out of every dollar and more out of every hour, I think people will absolutely still want that in 100 years —in whatever form that may take.”

David Senra

30,636 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The TradeHost AI from allows Betfair traders to use our AI for speed ratings, form, course, draw and many other criteria. These parameters are then ranked in order by the AI and this creates a total rating number for each horse running every single day 24/7. This can be especially useful for beginners or those who don't have the time or expertise to develop their own trading strategies for Betfair. The TradeHost AI will find value - the most important factor for trading and betting on Betfair - without members having to do any research. We call it trading with a view. Most Betfair traders that don't trade with a view will lose money - in running and pre race! Copy trading using the TradeHost AI can help Betfair traders diversify their portfolios, reduce risk, and potentially increase Betfair profits by following the strategies of the successful JuiceStorm automated trading portfolio that has used AI on Betfair since 2021.
0:49

The TradeHost AI from allows Betfair traders to use our AI for speed ratings, form, course, draw and many other criteria. These parameters are then ranked in order by the AI and this creates a total rating number for each horse running every single day 24/7. This can be especially useful for beginners or those who don't have the time or expertise to develop their own trading strategies for Betfair. The TradeHost AI will find value - the most important factor for trading and betting on Betfair - without members having to do any research. We call it trading with a view. Most Betfair traders that don't trade with a view will lose money - in running and pre race! Copy trading using the TradeHost AI can help Betfair traders diversify their portfolios, reduce risk, and potentially increase Betfair profits by following the strategies of the successful JuiceStorm automated trading portfolio that has used AI on Betfair since 2021.

Betfair Trading - JuiceStorm.com

29,329 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Today, we’re excited to launch Attention Labs. For almost 400,000 years, humanity has progressed through a simple but powerful cycle: we learn, we build, and we pass knowledge forward. Every major leap in civilization, from fire to medicine to computing, has expanded what humans are capable of achieving. We believe AI is the next great tool in that journey. While much of the world is focused on how AI can replace human work, we are focused on a different question: How can AI amplify human potential? At Attention Labs, we are building AI to discover brain-enhancing therapeutics, solve neurocognitive diseases, and accelerate the discovery of medicines for the human mind. We believe the greatest opportunity for AI is not creating a world with fewer humans in the loop, but a world where every human can think more clearly, learn faster, create more boldly, and live more fully. The biggest source of alpha in the age of AI will not come from replacing people. It will come from empowering them. Our mission is simple: Make humans the most intelligent entity on Earth. The future belongs to those who amplify human intelligence, not those who seek to replace it. We're just getting started. Attention Labs
1:57

Today, we’re excited to launch Attention Labs. For almost 400,000 years, humanity has progressed through a simple but powerful cycle: we learn, we build, and we pass knowledge forward. Every major leap in civilization, from fire to medicine to computing, has expanded what humans are capable of achieving. We believe AI is the next great tool in that journey. While much of the world is focused on how AI can replace human work, we are focused on a different question: How can AI amplify human potential? At Attention Labs, we are building AI to discover brain-enhancing therapeutics, solve neurocognitive diseases, and accelerate the discovery of medicines for the human mind. We believe the greatest opportunity for AI is not creating a world with fewer humans in the loop, but a world where every human can think more clearly, learn faster, create more boldly, and live more fully. The biggest source of alpha in the age of AI will not come from replacing people. It will come from empowering them. Our mission is simple: Make humans the most intelligent entity on Earth. The future belongs to those who amplify human intelligence, not those who seek to replace it. We're just getting started. Attention Labs

Temi

37,046 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

A lot of takes on this my recent post : many suggesting that I am not a good trader for “ encountering loss” Bruh , I am the best Synthetic indices trader in the WORLD ❗️. Losses are un negotiable part of Trading 📊 , what makes you a good trader is your absolute ability to AT ALL TIMES , make more Profits than the Reds Plus ; Transparency is a virtue missing in most traders , when one ( me ) Exhibits it : that’s our way of telling you that Trading isn’t always about those FLASHY CARS or Expensive vacation Trips Dear trader , Get ready to loss accounts Also get ready to MAKE MORE BLUES than your RED - that’s the real definition of PROFITABLE TRADING❗️❗️❗️
1:08

A lot of takes on this my recent post : many suggesting that I am not a good trader for “ encountering loss” Bruh , I am the best Synthetic indices trader in the WORLD ❗️. Losses are un negotiable part of Trading 📊 , what makes you a good trader is your absolute ability to AT ALL TIMES , make more Profits than the Reds Plus ; Transparency is a virtue missing in most traders , when one ( me ) Exhibits it : that’s our way of telling you that Trading isn’t always about those FLASHY CARS or Expensive vacation Trips Dear trader , Get ready to loss accounts Also get ready to MAKE MORE BLUES than your RED - that’s the real definition of PROFITABLE TRADING❗️❗️❗️

Lucky mane Fx

23,978 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Puck's Dylan Byers says AI has become a priority for Hollywood, with every major studio exploring how to integrate it into production. "Every studio, even A24, is thinking, 'How do we incorporate AI into what we are doing?'" "The signal that those creators sent with films like Obsession and others is that [using AI in filmmaking] can be done and it can be successful. Does it mean that every human is going away? No. I think that most folks will find ways to incorporate [AI] in ways that do not significantly degrade the value of the content that they're making." "But I think the sky's the limit. Those examples have shown that this can be done and that there is more opportunity here than the folks who are clutching to Hollywood's past have realized."
1:25

Puck's Dylan Byers says AI has become a priority for Hollywood, with every major studio exploring how to integrate it into production. "Every studio, even A24, is thinking, 'How do we incorporate AI into what we are doing?'" "The signal that those creators sent with films like Obsession and others is that [using AI in filmmaking] can be done and it can be successful. Does it mean that every human is going away? No. I think that most folks will find ways to incorporate [AI] in ways that do not significantly degrade the value of the content that they're making." "But I think the sky's the limit. Those examples have shown that this can be done and that there is more opportunity here than the folks who are clutching to Hollywood's past have realized."

TBPN

54,791 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Sam Altman told the world exactly what skills will matter when AI takes over 30 to 40 percent of the global economy. He was asked what his own kids should do to survive it. His answer was surprisingly human. He said the single most valuable thing anyone can build right now is the meta-skill of learning how to learn. Not a degree or a certification but the raw ability to adapt when everything around you changes. He also said learning to understand what other people actually want and building useful things for them will be more valuable than almost any technical knowledge. That skill has never been automated and is not close to being automated. He said human creativity and the desire to express it are, in his words, limitless. Every major technological revolution increased the demand for creative, curious, and socially intelligent people, not decreased it. The Industrial Revolution is the clearest parallel. Machines replaced physical labor and people were terrified. The next generation took those machines and built industries, art forms, and institutions nobody had conceived of before. The people who thrived were not the ones who competed with the machines. They were the ones who learned to direct them toward something new. That dynamic is already playing out right now with AI. The practical implication is this, depth in a single rigid skill is becoming less valuable. The ability to move across domains, pick up new tools quickly, and apply judgment in ambiguous situations is becoming more valuable. Altman also pointed to something most career advice ignores entirely, learning how to interact with the world, build relationships, and earn trust from other people. Those are things AI can simulate but cannot replace. The honest opportunity in this moment is not to outrun AI. It is to focus on the things that make you irreducibly human. Curiosity, judgment, empathy and the ability to ask the right question before anyone knows what the right question is. The people who will matter most in an AI-driven economy are not necessarily the ones who understand the technology deepest. They are the ones who can figure out what the technology should actually be used for. Altman has spent his career betting on human potential in the face of technological disruption. Based on every historical precedent, that is still the right bet to make.
0:46

Sam Altman told the world exactly what skills will matter when AI takes over 30 to 40 percent of the global economy. He was asked what his own kids should do to survive it. His answer was surprisingly human. He said the single most valuable thing anyone can build right now is the meta-skill of learning how to learn. Not a degree or a certification but the raw ability to adapt when everything around you changes. He also said learning to understand what other people actually want and building useful things for them will be more valuable than almost any technical knowledge. That skill has never been automated and is not close to being automated. He said human creativity and the desire to express it are, in his words, limitless. Every major technological revolution increased the demand for creative, curious, and socially intelligent people, not decreased it. The Industrial Revolution is the clearest parallel. Machines replaced physical labor and people were terrified. The next generation took those machines and built industries, art forms, and institutions nobody had conceived of before. The people who thrived were not the ones who competed with the machines. They were the ones who learned to direct them toward something new. That dynamic is already playing out right now with AI. The practical implication is this, depth in a single rigid skill is becoming less valuable. The ability to move across domains, pick up new tools quickly, and apply judgment in ambiguous situations is becoming more valuable. Altman also pointed to something most career advice ignores entirely, learning how to interact with the world, build relationships, and earn trust from other people. Those are things AI can simulate but cannot replace. The honest opportunity in this moment is not to outrun AI. It is to focus on the things that make you irreducibly human. Curiosity, judgment, empathy and the ability to ask the right question before anyone knows what the right question is. The people who will matter most in an AI-driven economy are not necessarily the ones who understand the technology deepest. They are the ones who can figure out what the technology should actually be used for. Altman has spent his career betting on human potential in the face of technological disruption. Based on every historical precedent, that is still the right bet to make.

StockMarket.News

376,873 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

"You can either produce excellence or you can avoid criticism. But you cannot do both of those. The reason that you don't have certain excellence that you want is because you are afraid of getting criticized. You are afraid of the judgment that comes with it. You are afraid of standing out. You are afraid of being alone. You are afraid of people looking at you. You are worried about what people think of you. There are 2 categories of things in this world: 1) Things that are up to you 2) Things that are not up to you Which category does your reputation sit in? Your reputation is not up to you. I'm the one who associates your reputation with something, not you. You just do things. What's up to you? How you act. Your decisions. Your actions. That is up to you. Your reputation is not up to you. Here's how I know that: You all have a reputation about me and it's not in my control. I get to say and do whatever I say and do up here. I am in control of saying it. I am in control of doing it. The moment words leave my lips, who has control over what is done with those words? You! You are in control of what you think of me. And there's no way everybody in this room is going to think the exact same thing about me. No way. When it comes to exceptional, what we've got to understand is you can spend your whole life trying to avoid criticism and earn reputation, and it still won't be in your control. We can waste a lot of time missing out on excellence we could have been producing if we were just simply LESS trying to engineer what we wanted other people to think about us."
1:32

"You can either produce excellence or you can avoid criticism. But you cannot do both of those. The reason that you don't have certain excellence that you want is because you are afraid of getting criticized. You are afraid of the judgment that comes with it. You are afraid of standing out. You are afraid of being alone. You are afraid of people looking at you. You are worried about what people think of you. There are 2 categories of things in this world: 1) Things that are up to you 2) Things that are not up to you Which category does your reputation sit in? Your reputation is not up to you. I'm the one who associates your reputation with something, not you. You just do things. What's up to you? How you act. Your decisions. Your actions. That is up to you. Your reputation is not up to you. Here's how I know that: You all have a reputation about me and it's not in my control. I get to say and do whatever I say and do up here. I am in control of saying it. I am in control of doing it. The moment words leave my lips, who has control over what is done with those words? You! You are in control of what you think of me. And there's no way everybody in this room is going to think the exact same thing about me. No way. When it comes to exceptional, what we've got to understand is you can spend your whole life trying to avoid criticism and earn reputation, and it still won't be in your control. We can waste a lot of time missing out on excellence we could have been producing if we were just simply LESS trying to engineer what we wanted other people to think about us."

Brian Kight

308,812 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Flapping Airplanes co-founder Asher Spector explains why data efficiency is the greatest bottleneck to AI adoption: "To the extent that AI has been hard to integrate into the economy, I really think it's because models are much less data-efficient than humans. If you want it to learn a new task, or put it in a new vertical, it takes thousands of times more effort than it does to just tell a human what to do." "If you can make a model a million times more data-efficient, it's a million times easier to put into the economy. There's a ton of cool stuff that you can do in really data-constrained regimes. For example, whether it's robotics, or scientific discovery, or even something like trading, these problems have very limited data, and existing AI systems aren't quite as good at them as they are at other things. I think that learning to learn with less data is just tremendously valuable in all of these domains."
1:44

Flapping Airplanes co-founder Asher Spector explains why data efficiency is the greatest bottleneck to AI adoption: "To the extent that AI has been hard to integrate into the economy, I really think it's because models are much less data-efficient than humans. If you want it to learn a new task, or put it in a new vertical, it takes thousands of times more effort than it does to just tell a human what to do." "If you can make a model a million times more data-efficient, it's a million times easier to put into the economy. There's a ton of cool stuff that you can do in really data-constrained regimes. For example, whether it's robotics, or scientific discovery, or even something like trading, these problems have very limited data, and existing AI systems aren't quite as good at them as they are at other things. I think that learning to learn with less data is just tremendously valuable in all of these domains."

TBPN

92,419 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Julie, "Post Brexit we've lost 90% of out business with Europe, how can we mend our broken trading relationship with Europe?" Rishi Sunak, "I'm sorry things have been difficult.. We had the referendum.. Focus should be on making the best of the opportunity.. The economy is doing well, we're exporting around the world.. I can help by cutting your taxes on business rates" Mishal Husain, "Julie's question is about mending the trading relationship with Europe" Rishi Sunak, "I want to abolish your national insurance" Keir Starmer, "He says he's going to cut national insurance.. That's £46 billion which pays for our NHS and our pensions.. So if he cuts national insurance, it's either the NHS or our pensioners who will pay for it" Mishal Husain, "So far neither of you can answer Julie's question on how we can mend our broken trading relationship with Europe" Keir Starmer, "In relation to the EU.. I campaigned to Remain.. But we left and we're not going back.. But too many businesses are in the position you're in, so we want a better deal in trade with the EU" Mishal Husain, "Could we get a better trading deal with the EU?" Rishi Sunak, "You might be able to. Do you know what the price of it will be? It will be Free Movement of People" - Sounds great, where do I sign up! #RejoinEU
2:23

Julie, "Post Brexit we've lost 90% of out business with Europe, how can we mend our broken trading relationship with Europe?" Rishi Sunak, "I'm sorry things have been difficult.. We had the referendum.. Focus should be on making the best of the opportunity.. The economy is doing well, we're exporting around the world.. I can help by cutting your taxes on business rates" Mishal Husain, "Julie's question is about mending the trading relationship with Europe" Rishi Sunak, "I want to abolish your national insurance" Keir Starmer, "He says he's going to cut national insurance.. That's £46 billion which pays for our NHS and our pensions.. So if he cuts national insurance, it's either the NHS or our pensioners who will pay for it" Mishal Husain, "So far neither of you can answer Julie's question on how we can mend our broken trading relationship with Europe" Keir Starmer, "In relation to the EU.. I campaigned to Remain.. But we left and we're not going back.. But too many businesses are in the position you're in, so we want a better deal in trade with the EU" Mishal Husain, "Could we get a better trading deal with the EU?" Rishi Sunak, "You might be able to. Do you know what the price of it will be? It will be Free Movement of People" - Sounds great, where do I sign up! #RejoinEU

Farrukh

642,535 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce