Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

What happens when three partisan hack journalists write a bogus story for The New York Times and then one of the dumbest people to ever be on TV reads it? The result is Nicolle Wallace in 2023 saying this about John Durham and his investigation.

MAZE

528,713 subscribers

176,808 views • 11 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Comedy

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Viceroy Mike Davis 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 sure has a bee in his bonnet about Nicolle Wallace Nicolle Wallace : “I actually worked with her in the Bush 43 White House. And she might actually be the DUMBEST human being I’ve ever interacted with in politics…She has an IQ of about 75…” 😂😂👏🏻👏🏻

Viceroy Mike Davis 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 sure has a bee in his bonnet about Nicolle Wallace Nicolle Wallace : “I actually worked with her in the Bush 43 White House. And she might actually be the DUMBEST human being I’ve ever interacted with in politics…She has an IQ of about 75…” 😂😂👏🏻👏🏻

MAGA Kitty

46,447 views • 8 months ago

.Matt Whitlock on the "soft catch and kill" the New York Times tried to do to bury abuse accusations against Graham Platner: "It is called the soft catch and kill. The Daily Caller did a really great job breaking down the process of how the New York Times found incredibly shocking information and then proceeded to find different ways to bury it in a story. When you read that New York Times story, you would think their biggest objective was to bury the most troubling parts of this in between a lot of political conversation. They wanted to spend more time in that story giving you reason to doubt Lyndsey Fifield, who is a very good friend and also a very credible witness in this story. They wanted to spend more time giving people reason to doubt it, and that's what Graham Platner's team has done. They used the breadth of this story to say, 'She is a Republican operative. You shouldn't believe her.' The challenge is that there are now two or three more major outlets working on the story, trying to fill in the gaps that the New York Times left out in its effort to sort of cover for Graham Platner when it did this soft catch-and-kill play for him."

.Matt Whitlock on the "soft catch and kill" the New York Times tried to do to bury abuse accusations against Graham Platner: "It is called the soft catch and kill. The Daily Caller did a really great job breaking down the process of how the New York Times found incredibly shocking information and then proceeded to find different ways to bury it in a story. When you read that New York Times story, you would think their biggest objective was to bury the most troubling parts of this in between a lot of political conversation. They wanted to spend more time in that story giving you reason to doubt Lyndsey Fifield, who is a very good friend and also a very credible witness in this story. They wanted to spend more time giving people reason to doubt it, and that's what Graham Platner's team has done. They used the breadth of this story to say, 'She is a Republican operative. You shouldn't believe her.' The challenge is that there are now two or three more major outlets working on the story, trying to fill in the gaps that the New York Times left out in its effort to sort of cover for Graham Platner when it did this soft catch-and-kill play for him."

Conservative War Machine

26,599 views • 1 month ago

My response to the New York Times article written about the homeless in Deschutes County. It just so happens happens in summer 2023 I did the most extensive detailed assessment of Deschutes County homeless population ever. I spent over three months every day meticulously

My response to the New York Times article written about the homeless in Deschutes County. It just so happens happens in summer 2023 I did the most extensive detailed assessment of Deschutes County homeless population ever. I spent over three months every day meticulously

Kevin Dahlgren 🥾 🥾

66,491 views • 1 year ago

Jim Acosta is upset about the Scott Pelley firing; calls Paramount/CBS: “An ideological and partisan political project." This was said to Nicolle Wallace and Don Lemon on MSNOW.

Jim Acosta is upset about the Scott Pelley firing; calls Paramount/CBS: “An ideological and partisan political project." This was said to Nicolle Wallace and Don Lemon on MSNOW.

Western Lensman

50,946 views • 1 month ago

.Megyn Kelly rips the New York Times for their Catch-and-Kill story about Graham Platner's accusers: "This is not only the implosion of a candidate, but a serious black eye for the press. The New York Times had this woman. She was in their initial piece, but not with this story... It was designed to run cover for him."

.Megyn Kelly rips the New York Times for their Catch-and-Kill story about Graham Platner's accusers: "This is not only the implosion of a candidate, but a serious black eye for the press. The New York Times had this woman. She was in their initial piece, but not with this story... It was designed to run cover for him."

The Megyn Kelly Show

22,167 views • 17 days ago

Gov. Gavin Newsom: “New York Times. 4 subpoenas against journalists because he didn’t like the reporting on his Qatari airplane… the Trump story is a corruption story. Period. The greatest grift we’ve ever seen in 🇺🇸 history. That’s what we’re up against.”

Gov. Gavin Newsom: “New York Times. 4 subpoenas against journalists because he didn’t like the reporting on his Qatari airplane… the Trump story is a corruption story. Period. The greatest grift we’ve ever seen in 🇺🇸 history. That’s what we’re up against.”

The Tennessee Holler

31,305 views • 12 days ago

Polling matters again when it comes to what individual Americans are saying about the economy. All we need to do is talk to the people on the ground to find that out. And what you’ll find is that we’re in economically perilous times and the American People know that’s it because of the disastrous economic policies of Joe Biden. And the green energy bubble is getting ready to pop as a result.

Polling matters again when it comes to what individual Americans are saying about the economy. All we need to do is talk to the people on the ground to find that out. And what you’ll find is that we’re in economically perilous times and the American People know that’s it because of the disastrous economic policies of Joe Biden. And the green energy bubble is getting ready to pop as a result.

Matt Schlapp

10,256 views • 2 years ago

When I talk to the New York Times about the Woke Right, I'm a traitor and terrible for talking with the enemy. When Curtis Yarvin talks to the New York Times, it means his Woke Right ideas are ascendant and serious contentions Times readers need to "interface" with.

When I talk to the New York Times about the Woke Right, I'm a traitor and terrible for talking with the enemy. When Curtis Yarvin talks to the New York Times, it means his Woke Right ideas are ascendant and serious contentions Times readers need to "interface" with.

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

46,889 views • 1 year ago

Nicolle Wallace called the video of Biden being led off stage by Obama a "cheap fake." She then selectively edited it to NOT include the part when Obama helped Biden off stage and that's what she showed her audience. Turns out Biden didn't even recognize George Clooney, one of the people hosting the fundraiser for him. Nice job on misleading your audience Nicolle.

Nicolle Wallace called the video of Biden being led off stage by Obama a "cheap fake." She then selectively edited it to NOT include the part when Obama helped Biden off stage and that's what she showed her audience. Turns out Biden didn't even recognize George Clooney, one of the people hosting the fundraiser for him. Nice job on misleading your audience Nicolle.

MAZE

730,149 views • 1 year ago

Aaron Siri: The New York Times LIED about ICAN’s polio vaccine petition in a desperate attempt to “derail” RFK Jr.’s nomination for HHS. “The claim that the New York Times is making … is categorically FALSE. They knew it was false when they published it. They intended the country to be misled, and that’s what they accomplished. All of this is intended for one purpose: they’re desperately trying to derail Mr. Kennedy’s potential confirmation. The outrage here should not be about what The New York Times is saying. The outrage here should be that the FDA licensed a product for injection into children based on a clinical trial that only reviewed safety for three days after injection. That’s where the outrage should be. That should have been The New York Times headline. Most drugs are licensee based on multi-year placebo-controlled trials. Don’t take my word for it. Go to the FDA website, take a look yourself. It’s not my petition. I have a client, ICAN, and it’ll be their choice whether they want to leave the petition in place. I can tell you this: ICAN did not file that petition in order to get the FDA to actually withdraw the vaccine … they just want the FDA to require proper data. This is about choice. It’s about informed consent.”

Aaron Siri: The New York Times LIED about ICAN’s polio vaccine petition in a desperate attempt to “derail” RFK Jr.’s nomination for HHS. “The claim that the New York Times is making … is categorically FALSE. They knew it was false when they published it. They intended the country to be misled, and that’s what they accomplished. All of this is intended for one purpose: they’re desperately trying to derail Mr. Kennedy’s potential confirmation. The outrage here should not be about what The New York Times is saying. The outrage here should be that the FDA licensed a product for injection into children based on a clinical trial that only reviewed safety for three days after injection. That’s where the outrage should be. That should have been The New York Times headline. Most drugs are licensee based on multi-year placebo-controlled trials. Don’t take my word for it. Go to the FDA website, take a look yourself. It’s not my petition. I have a client, ICAN, and it’ll be their choice whether they want to leave the petition in place. I can tell you this: ICAN did not file that petition in order to get the FDA to actually withdraw the vaccine … they just want the FDA to require proper data. This is about choice. It’s about informed consent.”

MAHA PAC🗽

37,912 views • 1 year ago

"All of the red lights are blinking about what is about to happen and I think that's what makes what Jack Smith is doing is so important because he is saying, right now, this is a stress test for the entire criminal justice system" - Charlie Sykes w/ Nicolle Wallace

"All of the red lights are blinking about what is about to happen and I think that's what makes what Jack Smith is doing is so important because he is saying, right now, this is a stress test for the entire criminal justice system" - Charlie Sykes w/ Nicolle Wallace

Deadline White House

2,178,696 views • 2 years ago

In 1964, a composer named John Williams was hired to write a theme song for a new TV show called GILLIGAN'S ISLAND Sherwood Schwartz disliked it, fired him, and got someone else to write a new theme song. This is the John Williams original for the pilot.

In 1964, a composer named John Williams was hired to write a theme song for a new TV show called GILLIGAN'S ISLAND Sherwood Schwartz disliked it, fired him, and got someone else to write a new theme song. This is the John Williams original for the pilot.

Hollywood Horror Museum

762,845 views • 8 months ago

Eric Schmidt, former Google CEO, on why top programmers won't be replaced by AI, they'll be amplified by it: He starts with an observation about the existing hierarchy in software: "The very top programmers were worth 10 times more than the ones right below. There's something special about the mathematical reasoning skills of programmers." Rather than flattening that gap, he argues AI will widen it: "Those people will become more valuable, not less valuable, because these systems need to be controlled by humans at the moment. Those people will be capable of grasping the parallelization and the activities of this." To show what this amplification actually looks like in practice, Eric shares a story from a startup he's involved with. He was talking to one of the programmers there, who works on UIs, about his daily workflow: "He said, 'I write the spec of what I want and then I write a test function, an evaluation function. And then I turn it on.' I said, 'What time?' And he goes, '7:00 in the evening.' And I go, 'Okay. What do you then do?' Well, he has dinner with his wife and he goes to sleep." Eric continues: "I said, 'Do you wake up?' Said, 'No, I sleep very well.' 'When does it finish?' 'Oh, 4:00 in the morning.' And then he gets up, has breakfast, you know, does whatever he does, and then he sees what's been good." Eric Schmidt calls the whole thing "mindboggling." The story captures what amplification really means. The programmer isn't writing less code. He's producing a night's worth of work while asleep, because the machine is running on his spec, his tests, his judgment of what "good" looks like. The leverage belongs to those who can define the problem precisely, write the tests that matter, and recognize good output when they see it.

Eric Schmidt, former Google CEO, on why top programmers won't be replaced by AI, they'll be amplified by it: He starts with an observation about the existing hierarchy in software: "The very top programmers were worth 10 times more than the ones right below. There's something special about the mathematical reasoning skills of programmers." Rather than flattening that gap, he argues AI will widen it: "Those people will become more valuable, not less valuable, because these systems need to be controlled by humans at the moment. Those people will be capable of grasping the parallelization and the activities of this." To show what this amplification actually looks like in practice, Eric shares a story from a startup he's involved with. He was talking to one of the programmers there, who works on UIs, about his daily workflow: "He said, 'I write the spec of what I want and then I write a test function, an evaluation function. And then I turn it on.' I said, 'What time?' And he goes, '7:00 in the evening.' And I go, 'Okay. What do you then do?' Well, he has dinner with his wife and he goes to sleep." Eric continues: "I said, 'Do you wake up?' Said, 'No, I sleep very well.' 'When does it finish?' 'Oh, 4:00 in the morning.' And then he gets up, has breakfast, you know, does whatever he does, and then he sees what's been good." Eric Schmidt calls the whole thing "mindboggling." The story captures what amplification really means. The programmer isn't writing less code. He's producing a night's worth of work while asleep, because the machine is running on his spec, his tests, his judgment of what "good" looks like. The leverage belongs to those who can define the problem precisely, write the tests that matter, and recognize good output when they see it.

Big Brain AI

15,319 views • 3 months ago

Perspective of a Jewish New Yorker on Mamdani and the current Jewish experience This is one of many perspectives, but I believe it is important to share this one, and he deserves to be heard, especially by people outside of New York and around the world. People keep saying that a historic number of voters supported Zohran Mamdani. What is often left out is that a historic number of people also voted against him. New York City has roughly 8.5 million residents. A little over 1 million people voted for Mamdani. The margin between him and the other candidates was about 138,000 votes. That is not a sweeping mandate. For New Yorkers, this context matters. Numbers without honesty erase real fear, real experiences, and real opposition. This perspective is not the only one, but it is a very valid one. Honored to share this. 🙏 TT: ScottyP

Perspective of a Jewish New Yorker on Mamdani and the current Jewish experience This is one of many perspectives, but I believe it is important to share this one, and he deserves to be heard, especially by people outside of New York and around the world. People keep saying that a historic number of voters supported Zohran Mamdani. What is often left out is that a historic number of people also voted against him. New York City has roughly 8.5 million residents. A little over 1 million people voted for Mamdani. The margin between him and the other candidates was about 138,000 votes. That is not a sweeping mandate. For New Yorkers, this context matters. Numbers without honesty erase real fear, real experiences, and real opposition. This perspective is not the only one, but it is a very valid one. Honored to share this. 🙏 TT: ScottyP

TheJewishAlly

26,963 views • 7 months ago

Grey Anderson, whose new piece "NATO Isn’t What It Says It Is" was published this week in The New York Times, talks about the history and future functions of the alliance.

Grey Anderson, whose new piece "NATO Isn’t What It Says It Is" was published this week in The New York Times, talks about the history and future functions of the alliance.

Democracy Now!

3,608,826 views • 3 years ago

Steven Spielberg was inspired to make Disclosure Day after witnessing UFO whistleblowers and pilots testifying in 2023 “I felt, starting back in, I think 2023, when the New York Times came out with a story,influenced by a whistleblower that released some footage to the New York Times. It was a story written by Helene Cooper and Ralph Blumenthal and Leslie Keane. And it was a story about what Navy pilots had photographed on their FLIR systems, their infrared systems, their forward facing infrared systems of a ufo, now called a uap, which stands for Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon. In a sense it brought a more of a serious, more of an acceptable, sort of lexicon of terms to a world that even now, 50 years after Close Encounters, is more likely to believe that something has been happening for decade upon decade upon decade about, our world being visited. Our movie is about what would happen if all this information was disclosed all at the same time. How would that affect everything? And the story really is about the attempt to stop any disclosure from ever taking place.”

Steven Spielberg was inspired to make Disclosure Day after witnessing UFO whistleblowers and pilots testifying in 2023 “I felt, starting back in, I think 2023, when the New York Times came out with a story,influenced by a whistleblower that released some footage to the New York Times. It was a story written by Helene Cooper and Ralph Blumenthal and Leslie Keane. And it was a story about what Navy pilots had photographed on their FLIR systems, their infrared systems, their forward facing infrared systems of a ufo, now called a uap, which stands for Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon. In a sense it brought a more of a serious, more of an acceptable, sort of lexicon of terms to a world that even now, 50 years after Close Encounters, is more likely to believe that something has been happening for decade upon decade upon decade about, our world being visited. Our movie is about what would happen if all this information was disclosed all at the same time. How would that affect everything? And the story really is about the attempt to stop any disclosure from ever taking place.”

Red Panda Koala

59,255 views • 1 month ago