Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

"What harm does that cause you?" James Hanson debates whether burqas should be included in the face coverings ban with caller Daniel.

20,911 views • 18 days ago •via X (Twitter)

33 Comments

Unfiltered Geordie's profile picture
Unfiltered Geordie18 days ago

@jhansonradio Because it’s about security, identification and basic trust. Asking for an uncovered face in public isn’t persecution.

Mr Tea (Not the real Mr Tea)'s profile picture
Mr Tea (Not the real Mr Tea)18 days ago

@jhansonradio Let’s flip this…. “What harm does that cause you?" … said the woman to the man while walking around Qatar in a ‘Mini Skirt’. Idiot! 🤦🏻‍♂️

Katie's profile picture
Katie18 days ago

@jhansonradio The timing of the State's ban on face coverings is interesting. They never objected to Antifa, trans activists, pro Pals or Muslims covering their faces.

JamesGorf's profile picture
JamesGorf18 days ago

@jhansonradio What harm do balaclavas do?

Alan Duncan's profile picture
Alan Duncan18 days ago

@jhansonradio It's the ideology it covers. That ideology has no place in 🇬🇧.

Ben's profile picture
Ben18 days ago

@jhansonradio Yes. It’s not British…..it’s not Christian and it’s oppressive to women But then again, you lot also argue that men should be allowed in women’s spaces.

Nan's profile picture
Nan18 days ago

@jhansonradio For one thing, you don't know WHO is in it, nor even if it's male or female, AND a great many things can be 'stowed away' beneath it, Including weapons and/or suicide bombs....

Biology Rules Ok's profile picture
Biology Rules Ok18 days ago

@jhansonradio If you're against robbers wearing balaclavas you should be against robbers wearing burkas. As for "What harm does that cause you", Well many of the victims of burka crime were attacked. One was even used in an assassination attempt in England.

Russell Ashley's profile picture
Russell Ashley18 days ago

@jhansonradio There are cases where people wear this monstrosity of a garment to commit crime and try to conceal their identity to escape justice so why are we trying to say otherwise?

Dissent Ledger's profile picture
Dissent Ledger18 days ago

@jhansonradio If you want to ban face coverings, then ban face coverings! You can’t suggest a law for one and not the other! That would be two tier! Oh…

The Fight to Be Human's profile picture
The Fight to Be Human18 days ago

@jhansonradio

Emma Jones's profile picture
Emma Jones18 days ago

@jhansonradio I’ve always been relaxed about Muslim women choosing to cover their face, but witnessed something recently where I realised a young woman I encountered was being coerced into it & found it uncomfortable. I’m not relaxed about UK society standing by while any woman is oppressed.

hocif's profile picture
hocif18 days ago

@jhansonradio What harm do balaclava cause you? Lovely garment isn't it. Always nice to see people hiding their face. Just eyes. Gives a lovely social vibe. Let's all adopt balaclavas. Lbc sees no issue with them.

Tony White's profile picture
Tony White18 days ago

@jhansonradio Burkas have been used by hundreds to commit crimes because they know they wont be challenged 🤷🏾‍♂️

Rodger's profile picture
Rodger18 days ago

@jhansonradio If everyone took Heroin would that make society better? If everyone covered their faces would that make society better? The answer to both questions is obviously No. It’s about societal harm.

Andrew O'Boyle's profile picture
Andrew O'Boyle18 days ago

What an Idiot this presenter is. Lets face it, a Terrorist left this country pretending to be a woman. Also if you ban face covering you MUST include the Burqas and any face covering which prevents people being Identified. If I can be stopped for innocently having my face covered when Riding my Bicycle, or not allowed into shops or banks with an open faced Motorcycle helmet then why should a Burqas be special. Just remember one thing. Terrorists use Women to go out with suicide belts/vests on to kill as many people as possible. In Israel many of those Murdered by Burqa covered faces would have been alive now are people would have seen the eyes of the person Murdering them. Ban the Burqa and all face coverings. There will be only criminals covering their faces after that. Fines start at £100, with no upper limit on repeat offenders. If you hit Ten times repeating you go to prison.

Dorset11's profile picture
Dorset1118 days ago

@jhansonradio

XY's profile picture
XY18 days ago

@jhansonradio One of the 7/7 bombers dressed in a burqa to avoid being caught

Sean Horne's profile picture
Sean Horne18 days ago

@jhansonradio These soft brained woke leftists have no idea what the are doing. They are infested with a parasite that eats them from the inside and we discard them once they are done.

Katie's profile picture
Katie18 days ago

@jhansonradio When were the debates over this?

Daniel's profile picture
Daniel18 days ago

@jhansonradio Funny how the left took no issue with face coverings when it was Muslims in Birmingham or free Palestine in London until the native men of Britain began to employ the same tactics.

Pa perfunctory's profile picture
Pa perfunctory18 days ago

@jhansonradio A face covering is a face covering, a rule is applied, then it’s for all. 🤸

Puny Parrot's profile picture
Puny Parrot18 days ago

@jhansonradio If you have not broken the law you are not legally required to give your name or address to a UK police officer The right to anonymity is a fundamental principle of a free society. Ai recognition software and the removal of masks so authorities can use it is Orwellian

shawry's profile picture
shawry17 days ago

@jhansonradio If is surely a flawed argument to suggest that everyone else at a protest or not shouldn’t be allowed to wear a face covering because we can’t identify them if they were to commit a crime but equally argue that you shoudnt ban the burqa because there’s no evidence of a crime????

Northshored's profile picture
Northshored18 days ago

@jhansonradio They only ban you covering your face if you're a brit.

AnonymousDan's profile picture
AnonymousDan17 days ago

@jhansonradio There’s a difference between regulating behaviour and banning religious clothing. If someone commits an offence or poses a genuine security risk, deal with that behaviour. But don’t criminalise someone simply for wearing a burqa. Equal rules, equal rights, no discrimination.

mattdallimore's profile picture
mattdallimore18 days ago

@jhansonradio Security issue

Derek Talbot's profile picture
Derek Talbot17 days ago

@jhansonradio They are not hiding and are not committing crime.

Stuart Hill's profile picture
Stuart Hill17 days ago

@jhansonradio I’ll tell you this presenter he’s a fucking retard

Emm Dee 🥩🥚's profile picture
Emm Dee 🥩🥚18 days ago

@jhansonradio This discussion is so yesterday. We've passed the point where this can be discussed. Millions must, and will, go

Alan Tabbner's profile picture
Alan Tabbner17 days ago

@jhansonradio Two tier face coverings ?

Frank Castle's profile picture
Frank Castle18 days ago

@jhansonradio Either covering your face in public is bad or it's not. You can't say "this specific group of protestors can't be allowed" then say "but all these other groups including different protestors can do it".

Dorset11's profile picture
Dorset1118 days ago

@jhansonradio Burqas, Muslims, Osma-Bin-Laden, 9/11, bombing Middle East Muslim (Oil Rich countries; Iran.. ☝️ All connected, all part of the same Jigsaw.

Related Videos