Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

What I saw today was a composed Jack Smith explaining his logical, evidence-based decisions to prosecute Trump for his election subversion attempts. House Republicans’ smears fell flat.

RepZoeLofgren's profile picture

Rep. Zoe Lofgren

88,679 subscribers

101,931 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨NEW: Scott Adams *TAKES SLEDGEHAMMER* to Jack Smith's testimony justifying "January 6 hoax"🚨 "According to Jack Smith, Trump was not free to violate federal law and use knowingly false statements about election fraud to target a lawful government function." "Now, do you see what's wrong with that statement? His evidence was based on his own ability to read a mind — because how would he know what Trump believed about the election?" "In my opinion, Trump genuinely believed — as I do — that the election was rigged."
2:53

🚨NEW: Scott Adams *TAKES SLEDGEHAMMER* to Jack Smith's testimony justifying "January 6 hoax"🚨 "According to Jack Smith, Trump was not free to violate federal law and use knowingly false statements about election fraud to target a lawful government function." "Now, do you see what's wrong with that statement? His evidence was based on his own ability to read a mind — because how would he know what Trump believed about the election?" "In my opinion, Trump genuinely believed — as I do — that the election was rigged."

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

154,936 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

JACK SMITH publicly testifies for the first time: "I want to be clear: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump..." "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican."
0:50

JACK SMITH publicly testifies for the first time: "I want to be clear: I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including the decision to bring charges against President Trump..." "If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Democrat or a Republican."

Fox News

162,857 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

BREAKING: Jack Smith just dropped a truth nuke on Republicans trying to drag his name through the mud. Smith says “Trump was charged because the evidence established that he willfully broke the very laws he took an oath to uphold.”
0:51

BREAKING: Jack Smith just dropped a truth nuke on Republicans trying to drag his name through the mud. Smith says “Trump was charged because the evidence established that he willfully broke the very laws he took an oath to uphold.”

Trump Lie Tracker (Commentary Account)

318,936 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Jack Smith: If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.
0:23

Jack Smith: If asked whether to prosecute a former president based on the same facts today, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat.

Acyn

98,833 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Remember, Jack Smith is NOT an independent counsel. He's a special counsel, answerable to AG Merrick Garland and ultimately to Joe Biden above him. Joe Biden made it clear that he wanted Jack Smith to prosecute Trump over J6. What do we have? Jack Smith prosecuting DOnald Trump over J6! This is not a DOJ investigation of a potential criminal. It is an American president prosecuting his chief political rival. Election interference!
0:33

Remember, Jack Smith is NOT an independent counsel. He's a special counsel, answerable to AG Merrick Garland and ultimately to Joe Biden above him. Joe Biden made it clear that he wanted Jack Smith to prosecute Trump over J6. What do we have? Jack Smith prosecuting DOnald Trump over J6! This is not a DOJ investigation of a potential criminal. It is an American president prosecuting his chief political rival. Election interference!

Charlie Kirk

578,773 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Jack Smith was illegally appointed as Special Counsel by Joe Biden to investigate President Donald J. Trump. His illegal prosecution of President Trump was clear election interference and a blatant attempt to subvert the will of the American people. It's time to hold Jack Smith accountable.
2:55

Jack Smith was illegally appointed as Special Counsel by Joe Biden to investigate President Donald J. Trump. His illegal prosecution of President Trump was clear election interference and a blatant attempt to subvert the will of the American people. It's time to hold Jack Smith accountable.

Rep. Barry Moore

38,071 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

House Republicans attacked a decorated career prosecutor today His offense? Exposing the truth of Trump's Jan 6 wrongdoing Jack Smith played it straight—because that’s what professionals do I explained on The Weeknight on MS NOW 👇
1:45

House Republicans attacked a decorated career prosecutor today His offense? Exposing the truth of Trump's Jan 6 wrongdoing Jack Smith played it straight—because that’s what professionals do I explained on The Weeknight on MS NOW 👇

Norm Eisen

26,908 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump says Jack Smith committed large-scale PERJURY during his testimony and must be PROSECUTED "Based on his testimony today, there is no question that Deranged Jack Smith should be prosecuted for his actions. He destroyed the lives of many innocent people, which has been his history as a prosecutor. At a minimum, he committed large scale perjury!" He's a criminal and a traitor. ARREST JACK SMITH!
1:42

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump says Jack Smith committed large-scale PERJURY during his testimony and must be PROSECUTED "Based on his testimony today, there is no question that Deranged Jack Smith should be prosecuted for his actions. He destroyed the lives of many innocent people, which has been his history as a prosecutor. At a minimum, he committed large scale perjury!" He's a criminal and a traitor. ARREST JACK SMITH!

Eric Daugherty

55,769 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

HANK JOHNSON: Did your investigation uncover evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew that his claim the election was stolen was false? JACK SMITH: Yes JOHNSON: And did your investigation uncover sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump publicly claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him while he privately acknowledged he lost? SMITH: Yes. We cited instances of that JOHNSON: Yet, here we see on the 5th anniversary of the insurrection, the Trump White House propaganda machine is still promoting the stolen election theory on a government webpage
1:43

HANK JOHNSON: Did your investigation uncover evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew that his claim the election was stolen was false? JACK SMITH: Yes JOHNSON: And did your investigation uncover sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump publicly claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him while he privately acknowledged he lost? SMITH: Yes. We cited instances of that JOHNSON: Yet, here we see on the 5th anniversary of the insurrection, the Trump White House propaganda machine is still promoting the stolen election theory on a government webpage

Aaron Rupar

316,735 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Johnson: “Did your investigation uncover evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew that his claim the election was stolen was false?” Smith: “Yes it did”
0:29

Johnson: “Did your investigation uncover evidence sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump knew that his claim the election was stolen was false?” Smith: “Yes it did”

The Bulwark

22,349 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Congress found evidence suggesting the Biden administration worked with the FBI and prosecutor Jack Smith to target Trump in a January 6 investigation. Senators Ron Johnson and Chuck Grassley exposed whistleblower evidence confirming the White House, FBI, and Special Counsel Jack Smith collaborated to execute "Arctic Frost" a scheme to arrest and prosecute Trump. They got Trump’s and Mike Pence’s old government phones without a warrant to search for evidence against Trump before the 2024 election. The senators sent a letter to the FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General Pam Bondi, asking for a clear and honest investigation to uncover the truth. Will justice prevail?
2:20

Congress found evidence suggesting the Biden administration worked with the FBI and prosecutor Jack Smith to target Trump in a January 6 investigation. Senators Ron Johnson and Chuck Grassley exposed whistleblower evidence confirming the White House, FBI, and Special Counsel Jack Smith collaborated to execute "Arctic Frost" a scheme to arrest and prosecute Trump. They got Trump’s and Mike Pence’s old government phones without a warrant to search for evidence against Trump before the 2024 election. The senators sent a letter to the FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General Pam Bondi, asking for a clear and honest investigation to uncover the truth. Will justice prevail?

ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

15,630 просмотров • 1 год назад

Even CNN is now turning on Jack Smith after his House Judiciary testimony. CNN legal analyst Elie Honig zeroed in on the moment Republicans cornered Smith over rushing the Trump case right before the 2024 election — and Smith had no answer. HONIG: “To your question, Brianna, the last Congressman we saw brought up the fact that jack Smith demanded a trial date four months out, five months out in a case involving 13 MILLION pages of documents.” “There is no defense lawyer in the country who can constitutionally prepare for trial and defend his client on that short of time frame.” “The implication was you were rushing to get this in before the 2024 election.” “Jack Smith did not defend himself, by the way. He didn’t say a word about that, which I found, I found striking.” “And Jack Smith has always maintained this veneer that he never thought about the election…of course he did!” “Why would would you demand such a quick trial date?”
0:37

Even CNN is now turning on Jack Smith after his House Judiciary testimony. CNN legal analyst Elie Honig zeroed in on the moment Republicans cornered Smith over rushing the Trump case right before the 2024 election — and Smith had no answer. HONIG: “To your question, Brianna, the last Congressman we saw brought up the fact that jack Smith demanded a trial date four months out, five months out in a case involving 13 MILLION pages of documents.” “There is no defense lawyer in the country who can constitutionally prepare for trial and defend his client on that short of time frame.” “The implication was you were rushing to get this in before the 2024 election.” “Jack Smith did not defend himself, by the way. He didn’t say a word about that, which I found, I found striking.” “And Jack Smith has always maintained this veneer that he never thought about the election…of course he did!” “Why would would you demand such a quick trial date?”

Overton

397,286 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Donald Trump's efforts to meddle in the 2020 election were laid out by Jack Smith in Volume 2 of his report, but the Justice Department refuses to release it. Republicans should join us in calling for the release of this report and for Jack Smith to testify. What are they afraid of?
1:43

Donald Trump's efforts to meddle in the 2020 election were laid out by Jack Smith in Volume 2 of his report, but the Justice Department refuses to release it. Republicans should join us in calling for the release of this report and for Jack Smith to testify. What are they afraid of?

Senator Adam Schiff

160,479 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

BREAKING: Republicans are investigating Jack Smith, but ignoring what he found. New bombshell reporting from MSNow: • Smith uncovered evidence Trump took top-secret docs tied to his business interests • Investigators saw this as a possible motive for keeping them • Trump allegedly showed a classified map on a private plane • Took documents so sensitive only 6 people in the U.S. could access them • Hundreds of classified records found at Mar-a-Lago after subpoenas • Grand jury indicted Trump on 37 counts Instead of digging into THIS… • Republicans are targeting the investigator, not the evidence • DOJ blocked release of key findings • Trump allies pushing probes into Smith himself Republicans are chasing the messenger, not the message or the crime.
0:54

BREAKING: Republicans are investigating Jack Smith, but ignoring what he found. New bombshell reporting from MSNow: • Smith uncovered evidence Trump took top-secret docs tied to his business interests • Investigators saw this as a possible motive for keeping them • Trump allegedly showed a classified map on a private plane • Took documents so sensitive only 6 people in the U.S. could access them • Hundreds of classified records found at Mar-a-Lago after subpoenas • Grand jury indicted Trump on 37 counts Instead of digging into THIS… • Republicans are targeting the investigator, not the evidence • DOJ blocked release of key findings • Trump allies pushing probes into Smith himself Republicans are chasing the messenger, not the message or the crime.

Ed Krassenstein

757,224 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Former US Special Counsel Jack Smith confronted Republican criticism of his investigation and told a House panel that President Donald Trump sought ways to remain in power after losing the 2020 election
2:23

Former US Special Counsel Jack Smith confronted Republican criticism of his investigation and told a House panel that President Donald Trump sought ways to remain in power after losing the 2020 election

Reuters

29,003 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Last week, Republicans had Jack Smith testify because they'd rather talk about Donald Trump trying to steal an election than his associations with Jeffrey Epstein. Republicans need to immediately hold a hearing on why the DOJ refuses to release the rest of the Epstein files.
1:40

Last week, Republicans had Jack Smith testify because they'd rather talk about Donald Trump trying to steal an election than his associations with Jeffrey Epstein. Republicans need to immediately hold a hearing on why the DOJ refuses to release the rest of the Epstein files.

Rep. Ted Lieu

91,837 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Toobin: It's not even news. Jack Smith cites these conversations in his report. So this is not like he was trying to keep keep this a secret. And remember what Smith was investigating. He was investigating Donald Trump's attempts to overturn the election through the use of fake electors in congress. He was lobbying members of congress to do just that
0:50

Toobin: It's not even news. Jack Smith cites these conversations in his report. So this is not like he was trying to keep keep this a secret. And remember what Smith was investigating. He was investigating Donald Trump's attempts to overturn the election through the use of fake electors in congress. He was lobbying members of congress to do just that

Acyn

177,353 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Yesterday Jack Smith said under oath to the House Judiciary Committee that he had evidence that proves without a doubt that Trump broke the law in his attempt to overthrow our free and fair election. Below is the full J6 indictment. An indictment by 12 grand jurors, not Biden.
1:06

Yesterday Jack Smith said under oath to the House Judiciary Committee that he had evidence that proves without a doubt that Trump broke the law in his attempt to overthrow our free and fair election. Below is the full J6 indictment. An indictment by 12 grand jurors, not Biden.

AnthonyAndrews

186,316 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Jack Smith just said it flat out: Trump was charged because the evidence showed he willfully broke the law he swore to uphold. Two grand juries agreed. He tried to overturn the 2020 election. He illegally kept classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. He obstructed justice to hide them. Smith: “No one should be above the law.”
1:47

Jack Smith just said it flat out: Trump was charged because the evidence showed he willfully broke the law he swore to uphold. Two grand juries agreed. He tried to overturn the 2020 election. He illegally kept classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. He obstructed justice to hide them. Smith: “No one should be above the law.”

Brian Allen

58,029 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад