正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

"What I think is the single most significant document that we have released" - Julian at the Wheeler Centre in 2015, on the doctrine of overthrowing a government, as if written by an "evil Noam Chomsky." 1/3

319,224 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

WikiLeaks 的头像
WikiLeaks2 年前

It takes "a seven-way pincer maneuver" of US national power to overthrow your government. 2/3

WikiLeaks 的头像
WikiLeaks2 年前

The document leak under discussion: US Army Special Operations Forces Unconventional Warfare, FM3-05.130, 30 Sep 2008

Human On Purpose 的头像
Human On Purpose2 年前

So glad Julian has been released… “free” was perhaps too big an ask. Let’s just say the walls of his prison have expanded and he’s been released to the general population section…

Cyn 的头像
Cyn2 年前

Thank you, Julian and Wikileaks. 💞👏🏻

taseenb 的头像
taseenb2 年前

Any resemblance to current events is purely coincidental. 🇻🇪

George Cameron 的头像
George Cameron2 年前

Yay!! Great Post WikiLeaks! Good to have you home, Julian. Congratulations to Stella. Just wonderful. ❤️❤️ The U.S. Manual for Unconventional Warfare is your most important publication. Thank you!

juls sunshine 的头像
juls sunshine2 年前

I'm sure it's also currently being Self inflicted on us. Thank you Julian, your sacrifice has been immense. 🙏✌

Thread Reader App 的头像
Thread Reader App2 年前

Your thread is very popular today! #TopUnroll 🙏🏼@CamiloGuezRodri for 🥇unroll

John Q. Public 的头像
John Q. Public2 年前

Julian is free!

Joy Dowdy 的头像
Joy Dowdy2 年前

Curious 🤔 I want to know and what does all this mean?

相关视频

Noam Chomsky on Why Our Limits Are the Foundation of Our Freedom Noam Chomsky flips a common intuition on its head: In a 1977 interview with Bryan Magee for the BBC series Men of Ideas, Chomsky is confronted with what his interviewer calls an "alarming" consequence of his theories. The idea that humans are, as Magee puts it, "very very rigidly pre-programmed." There are certain things we can understand, certain things we can communicate, "and anything that falls outside that we simply can't." Chomsky agrees with the premise. But not the alarm. "That's certainly correct," he says of the rigid pre-programming. What he pushes back on is the reaction to it: "While it's true that our genetic program rigidly constrains us, I think the more important point is that the existence of that rigid constraint is what provides the basis for our freedom and creativity." The interviewer, caught off guard, asks him to clarify. Does he really mean it's only because we're pre-programmed that we can do all the things we can do? "Exactly," Chomsky replies. Then he delivers the core of the argument: "If we really were plastic organisms without an extensive pre-programming, then the state that our mind achieves would in fact be a reflection of the environment." In other words: a mind without built-in structure wouldn't be a free mind but a mirror. It would simply take the shape of whatever surrounded it. Freedom and creativity require something internal doing the shaping, pushing back, generating. The constraints aren't the opposite of freedom. They're the precondition for it.

Big Brain Philosophy

11,225 次观看 • 3 个月前