正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

What if journalism could prevent conflict? When information breaks down: trust collapses, rumours spread, conflict follows. Yet supporting journalism costs far less than war. 15 days of global military spending = 1 year of funding for public-interest journalism. Journalism shapes peace: #WorldPressFreedomDay #PressFreedom

UNESCO

4,668,753 subscribers

10,455 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Asmongold isn’t holding back and takes aim at Hasan’s “I sometimes do journalism” remarks “Journalism is when you tell people they’re like anime characters..if Hasan was as big of a journalist..maybe Bernie would sit down with him for more than 15 min..you’re a streamer”

Asmongold isn’t holding back and takes aim at Hasan’s “I sometimes do journalism” remarks “Journalism is when you tell people they’re like anime characters..if Hasan was as big of a journalist..maybe Bernie would sit down with him for more than 15 min..you’re a streamer”

yeet

189,795 次观看 • 1 年前

#PressFreedom is the cornerstone of democratic society. That’s why we need to protect freedom of expression & ensure that information remains a public good, accessible to all. Watch Audrey Azoulay's statement on the occasion of #WorldPressFreedomDay 30th anniversary. 👇

#PressFreedom is the cornerstone of democratic society. That’s why we need to protect freedom of expression & ensure that information remains a public good, accessible to all. Watch Audrey Azoulay's statement on the occasion of #WorldPressFreedomDay 30th anniversary. 👇

UNESCO

83,411 次观看 • 3 年前

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 The global economy is teetering on the edge of a depression if the current military buildup against Iran continues. Professor Seyed Mohammad Marandi notes that the U.S. has already spent well over $100 billion on a conflict that will only end in failure. Prof. Marandi suggested the price of war is far too high for the American public to bear, especially as domestic recession looms. "Even if right now there is peace, we are going to have a bad global recession. But if we have war, it's going to be a very deep depression worse than what happened in the 1930s." Seyed Mohammad Marandi

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 The global economy is teetering on the edge of a depression if the current military buildup against Iran continues. Professor Seyed Mohammad Marandi notes that the U.S. has already spent well over $100 billion on a conflict that will only end in failure. Prof. Marandi suggested the price of war is far too high for the American public to bear, especially as domestic recession looms. "Even if right now there is peace, we are going to have a bad global recession. But if we have war, it's going to be a very deep depression worse than what happened in the 1930s." Seyed Mohammad Marandi

Mario Nawfal

76,770 次观看 • 3 个月前

🇺🇸🇮🇷 If the war continues, the global economy faces a level of disruption that far exceeds what has been felt in the first 40 days. We are seeing shortages in everything from aluminum to helium, with the cost of the war being imposed on the public through skyrocketing prices. Professor Steve Hanke argues that the administration has failed to tally the actual benefits and costs, ignoring the external economic impact of the conflict. Bogging down in a long-term war will only lead to more rationing, emptied petrol stations, and a permanent shift in the regional balance of power. Steve Hanke

🇺🇸🇮🇷 If the war continues, the global economy faces a level of disruption that far exceeds what has been felt in the first 40 days. We are seeing shortages in everything from aluminum to helium, with the cost of the war being imposed on the public through skyrocketing prices. Professor Steve Hanke argues that the administration has failed to tally the actual benefits and costs, ignoring the external economic impact of the conflict. Bogging down in a long-term war will only lead to more rationing, emptied petrol stations, and a permanent shift in the regional balance of power. Steve Hanke

Mario Nawfal

99,642 次观看 • 3 个月前

I've been BANNED from ALL HOSPITALS for a journalistic inquiry regarding a SUSPENDED foreign doctor I’ve been banned from every Alberta Health Services hospital for a year after a short visit back in March in which I calmly asked a nurse if a doctor would be available for an interview and left when told no. No raised voice, no confrontation, no refusal to leave. In fact, I was never even asked to leave. Yet a full facility-wide trespass ban was served to me months later. The doctor in question is suspended in South Africa, and he is now accused of negligence over the death of Baby Alita. I was doing my due diligence as a journalist attempting to extend him the opportunity for his side of the story. The ban is disproportionate, retaliatory, and completely unwarranted. Public interest journalism in Alberta shouldn’t be punished; it should be protected. I haven’t experienced such a ban even in South Africa, which supposedly has less press freedom than Alberta. Please follow and support Media Bezirgan for more on-the-ground public interest journalism, thank you!

I've been BANNED from ALL HOSPITALS for a journalistic inquiry regarding a SUSPENDED foreign doctor I’ve been banned from every Alberta Health Services hospital for a year after a short visit back in March in which I calmly asked a nurse if a doctor would be available for an interview and left when told no. No raised voice, no confrontation, no refusal to leave. In fact, I was never even asked to leave. Yet a full facility-wide trespass ban was served to me months later. The doctor in question is suspended in South Africa, and he is now accused of negligence over the death of Baby Alita. I was doing my due diligence as a journalist attempting to extend him the opportunity for his side of the story. The ban is disproportionate, retaliatory, and completely unwarranted. Public interest journalism in Alberta shouldn’t be punished; it should be protected. I haven’t experienced such a ban even in South Africa, which supposedly has less press freedom than Alberta. Please follow and support Media Bezirgan for more on-the-ground public interest journalism, thank you!

Mocha Bezirgan 🇨🇦

51,705 次观看 • 14 天前

The media's fatal mistake was giving Silicon Valley ownership of the audience while journalists did all the work. Journalists no longer own their audience, their data, their revenue, their distribution, or increasingly, even their own work. Think about how insane that is. The people creating the content don't control the business built around it. That's a crisis that's far bigger than left versus right, censorship, or media bias: the entire economic model underpinning journalism is broken. A reporter can risk their life covering a war in Ukraine, corruption in Africa, or political unrest in the Middle East, generate millions of views, and still have no idea how much money their work made, when they'll get paid, why one story performed better than another, or whether the platform will bury them tomorrow. Meanwhile, the platforms know everything. They see every click, every view, every dollar, and every trend. The creators see almost none of it. Coinbase is trying to solve what may be the biggest problem in journalism itself: Ownership. Who owns the audience, the data, the monetization, and most importantly, the relationship with readers? Because for the last decade, the answer has largely been Silicon Valley. And that's exactly why so many journalists, newspapers, creators and independent outlets have been slowly suffocated. His argument is that journalism doesn't have a content problem; it has a control problem. And unless journalists take back ownership of their audiences, their data, their revenue, and their IP, the people producing the information society depends on will continue getting weaker while the platforms built on top of them get stronger. It's one of the most important conversations I've had about the future of media. Because if journalism can't figure out how to survive economically, then eventually there won't be any journalism left to save.

The media's fatal mistake was giving Silicon Valley ownership of the audience while journalists did all the work. Journalists no longer own their audience, their data, their revenue, their distribution, or increasingly, even their own work. Think about how insane that is. The people creating the content don't control the business built around it. That's a crisis that's far bigger than left versus right, censorship, or media bias: the entire economic model underpinning journalism is broken. A reporter can risk their life covering a war in Ukraine, corruption in Africa, or political unrest in the Middle East, generate millions of views, and still have no idea how much money their work made, when they'll get paid, why one story performed better than another, or whether the platform will bury them tomorrow. Meanwhile, the platforms know everything. They see every click, every view, every dollar, and every trend. The creators see almost none of it. Coinbase is trying to solve what may be the biggest problem in journalism itself: Ownership. Who owns the audience, the data, the monetization, and most importantly, the relationship with readers? Because for the last decade, the answer has largely been Silicon Valley. And that's exactly why so many journalists, newspapers, creators and independent outlets have been slowly suffocated. His argument is that journalism doesn't have a content problem; it has a control problem. And unless journalists take back ownership of their audiences, their data, their revenue, and their IP, the people producing the information society depends on will continue getting weaker while the platforms built on top of them get stronger. It's one of the most important conversations I've had about the future of media. Because if journalism can't figure out how to survive economically, then eventually there won't be any journalism left to save.

Mario Nawfal

250,194 次观看 • 1 个月前

Glenn Greenwald says corporate journalists are losing their minds over Elon Musk calling out major corporations for stifling free speech because they are in bed with the very corporations they claim to scrutinize. Glenn Greenwald explains that we are at a crossroads where journalism, once a watchdog of establishment power, is now shackled by corporate advertisers. "What went wrong here is not what Elon Musk said. It's so revealing that so many journalists are aghast that anyone would dare tell Disney and major corporations to go f**k yourself when they're trying to limit, censor, and control the flow of political content. If you aren't willing to say that to corporations who are trying to limit what you can say, don't bother calling yourself a journalist. We need way more journalists willing to say, go f**k yourself to people who try and limit what they say. The problem is, is that the people who are hired by these major media corporations, and who thrive in them and succeed in them are people who have the opposite instinct. Their instinct is to assuage and serve and placate establishment power, not to defy it. Even though the purpose of journalism is to be adversarial to establishment power. Once journalism started getting corporatized no longer owned by families dedicated to journalism or local communities but by major corporations that have all kinds of other interests besides their media division. And, what kind of attributes are awarded at major corporations? People who avoid controversy who avoid conflict, who avoid displeasing and angering powerful people. That's the corporate ethos, and the corporatization of media meant that that kind of attribute was imported into journalism. And that's why almost no one who works for large media corporations or the media corporations themselves has the courage to say this. They're shocked. They think it's a sign that he's unhinged when in reality, it's just a sign of how cowardly and craven they are."

Glenn Greenwald says corporate journalists are losing their minds over Elon Musk calling out major corporations for stifling free speech because they are in bed with the very corporations they claim to scrutinize. Glenn Greenwald explains that we are at a crossroads where journalism, once a watchdog of establishment power, is now shackled by corporate advertisers. "What went wrong here is not what Elon Musk said. It's so revealing that so many journalists are aghast that anyone would dare tell Disney and major corporations to go fk yourself when they're trying to limit, censor, and control the flow of political content. If you aren't willing to say that to corporations who are trying to limit what you can say, don't bother calling yourself a journalist. We need way more journalists willing to say, go fk yourself to people who try and limit what they say. The problem is, is that the people who are hired by these major media corporations, and who thrive in them and succeed in them are people who have the opposite instinct. Their instinct is to assuage and serve and placate establishment power, not to defy it. Even though the purpose of journalism is to be adversarial to establishment power. Once journalism started getting corporatized no longer owned by families dedicated to journalism or local communities but by major corporations that have all kinds of other interests besides their media division. And, what kind of attributes are awarded at major corporations? People who avoid controversy who avoid conflict, who avoid displeasing and angering powerful people. That's the corporate ethos, and the corporatization of media meant that that kind of attribute was imported into journalism. And that's why almost no one who works for large media corporations or the media corporations themselves has the courage to say this. They're shocked. They think it's a sign that he's unhinged when in reality, it's just a sign of how cowardly and craven they are."

KanekoaTheGreat

23,825,665 次观看 • 2 年前

Coinbase's James Morek: The media's fatal mistake was giving Silicon Valley ownership of the audience while journalists did all the work Journalists no longer own their audience, their data, their revenue, their distribution, or increasingly, even their own work. Think about how insane that is. The people creating the content don't control the business built around it. That's a crisis that's far bigger than left versus right, censorship, or media bias: the entire economic model underpinning journalism is broken. A reporter can risk their life covering a war in Ukraine, corruption in Africa, or political unrest in the Middle East, generate millions of views, and still have no idea how much money their work made, when they'll get paid, why one story performed better than another, or whether the platform will bury them tomorrow. Meanwhile, the platforms know everything. They see every click, every view, every dollar, and every trend. The creators see almost none of it. Coinbase is trying to solve what may be the biggest problem in journalism itself: Ownership. Who owns the audience, the data, the monetization, and most importantly, the relationship with readers? Because for the last decade, the answer has largely been Silicon Valley. And that's exactly why so many journalists, newspapers, creators and independent outlets have been slowly suffocated. His argument is that journalism doesn't have a content problem; it has a control problem. And unless journalists take back ownership of their audiences, their data, their revenue, and their IP, the people producing the information society depends on will continue getting weaker while the platforms built on top of them get stronger. It's one of the most important conversations I've had about the future of media. Because if journalism can't figure out how to survive economically, then eventually there won't be any journalism left to save. 01:14 - Major media is becoming a political institution, and the talent doesn't have to stay trapped inside it 01:51 - The whole system is a guessing game, right down to when you actually get paid 05:01 - One person can control what billions of people see 08:46 – It’s all about bringing professional journalism back 11:39 - Watch your earnings tick up live in the app, like a debt clock for your own work 12:30 - Shadow bans, slashed CPMs, pulled advertisers, debanking: censorship has a lot of tools 16:46 - Soon you'll be able to stake journalists, and the bidding war for the world's best begins 19:25 - Professional journalism got left behind by Silicon Valley, and the mission is to help it thrive again Disclaimer: This content was produced in collaboration with the other party and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial or investment advice. Always conduct your own research before making any decisions.

Coinbase's James Morek: The media's fatal mistake was giving Silicon Valley ownership of the audience while journalists did all the work Journalists no longer own their audience, their data, their revenue, their distribution, or increasingly, even their own work. Think about how insane that is. The people creating the content don't control the business built around it. That's a crisis that's far bigger than left versus right, censorship, or media bias: the entire economic model underpinning journalism is broken. A reporter can risk their life covering a war in Ukraine, corruption in Africa, or political unrest in the Middle East, generate millions of views, and still have no idea how much money their work made, when they'll get paid, why one story performed better than another, or whether the platform will bury them tomorrow. Meanwhile, the platforms know everything. They see every click, every view, every dollar, and every trend. The creators see almost none of it. Coinbase is trying to solve what may be the biggest problem in journalism itself: Ownership. Who owns the audience, the data, the monetization, and most importantly, the relationship with readers? Because for the last decade, the answer has largely been Silicon Valley. And that's exactly why so many journalists, newspapers, creators and independent outlets have been slowly suffocated. His argument is that journalism doesn't have a content problem; it has a control problem. And unless journalists take back ownership of their audiences, their data, their revenue, and their IP, the people producing the information society depends on will continue getting weaker while the platforms built on top of them get stronger. It's one of the most important conversations I've had about the future of media. Because if journalism can't figure out how to survive economically, then eventually there won't be any journalism left to save. 01:14 - Major media is becoming a political institution, and the talent doesn't have to stay trapped inside it 01:51 - The whole system is a guessing game, right down to when you actually get paid 05:01 - One person can control what billions of people see 08:46 – It’s all about bringing professional journalism back 11:39 - Watch your earnings tick up live in the app, like a debt clock for your own work 12:30 - Shadow bans, slashed CPMs, pulled advertisers, debanking: censorship has a lot of tools 16:46 - Soon you'll be able to stake journalists, and the bidding war for the world's best begins 19:25 - Professional journalism got left behind by Silicon Valley, and the mission is to help it thrive again Disclaimer: This content was produced in collaboration with the other party and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial or investment advice. Always conduct your own research before making any decisions.

Mario Nawfal

323,649 次观看 • 1 个月前

I watched David Cochrane’s exchange with Adam Chambers, and it didn’t feel like Chambers’ actual argument was being heard. Disagreement is fine. That is not the issue. The problem is when an interview feels more like it is pushing toward a preferred outcome than trying to understand or test what is being said. If you invite someone on air, you should engage with their point, not talk past it in search of a moment. This is where trust breaks down. When the CBC or any major outlet appears invested in a narrative rather than fairness, people notice. And once that trust is gone, it is very hard to get back. Media only works when the audience believes it is operating in good faith. When it starts to feel like partisan refereeing instead of journalism, the long term damage is far greater than any short term political win.

I watched David Cochrane’s exchange with Adam Chambers, and it didn’t feel like Chambers’ actual argument was being heard. Disagreement is fine. That is not the issue. The problem is when an interview feels more like it is pushing toward a preferred outcome than trying to understand or test what is being said. If you invite someone on air, you should engage with their point, not talk past it in search of a moment. This is where trust breaks down. When the CBC or any major outlet appears invested in a narrative rather than fairness, people notice. And once that trust is gone, it is very hard to get back. Media only works when the audience believes it is operating in good faith. When it starts to feel like partisan refereeing instead of journalism, the long term damage is far greater than any short term political win.

Shane Wenzel

24,689 次观看 • 7 个月前

In 2024, 68 journalists were killed, with over 60% in conflict zones—the highest toll in a decade. Their work is vital for justice and accountability. UNESCO supports journalists with legal aid, training, and resources to ensure their safety. #PressFreedom #JournoSafe

In 2024, 68 journalists were killed, with over 60% in conflict zones—the highest toll in a decade. Their work is vital for justice and accountability. UNESCO supports journalists with legal aid, training, and resources to ensure their safety. #PressFreedom #JournoSafe

UNESCO

12,356 次观看 • 1 年前

For more than a decade, Maktoob has practiced journalism with one commitment: to document what happens around us, to hold power accountable, and to amplify the voices of the marginalised — voices often silenced, dismissed, or branded “dangerous” by the oppressors. Our survival, however, is becoming harder every day. We face constant financial challenges, and subscriptions remain our only source of strength. If you believe in independent journalism — if you believe in truth in a country where press freedom is under siege — we ask you to stand with us. Subscribe to Maktoob today. Subscriptions • 1 Year — ₹1200 • 5 Years — ₹5000 • Premium — ₹10000 International • 1 Year — $100 • 5 Years — $300 • Premium — $500 👉 Subscribe here: Other Payment Options •Bank Transfer Account Name: MAKTOOB MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Acc No: 060305002108 IFSC: ICIC0000603 Bank: ICICI BANK, Kallai Road •UPI: maktoobmedia@icici •PayPal: Subscriber Benefits • Weekly newsletters • Subscriber-only events • Exclusive Maktoob Opinion newsletter

For more than a decade, Maktoob has practiced journalism with one commitment: to document what happens around us, to hold power accountable, and to amplify the voices of the marginalised — voices often silenced, dismissed, or branded “dangerous” by the oppressors. Our survival, however, is becoming harder every day. We face constant financial challenges, and subscriptions remain our only source of strength. If you believe in independent journalism — if you believe in truth in a country where press freedom is under siege — we ask you to stand with us. Subscribe to Maktoob today. Subscriptions • 1 Year — ₹1200 • 5 Years — ₹5000 • Premium — ₹10000 International • 1 Year — $100 • 5 Years — $300 • Premium — $500 👉 Subscribe here: Other Payment Options •Bank Transfer Account Name: MAKTOOB MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Acc No: 060305002108 IFSC: ICIC0000603 Bank: ICICI BANK, Kallai Road •UPI: maktoobmedia@icici •PayPal: Subscriber Benefits • Weekly newsletters • Subscriber-only events • Exclusive Maktoob Opinion newsletter

Maktoob

18,603 次观看 • 11 个月前

CBC has been reporting all day as if Freeland's working as an MP and at the same time an advisor to Zelenskyy was is some way legitimate and legal... blaming "Conservatives" for her announced departure This isn't impartial journalism Even more troubling, CBC has yet to report on the recent Zelenskyy corruption - CBC viewers had to find out from an Atlantic Council senior fellow (below) that his ministers were involved in a pay for vote scandal and that was ALL CBC allowed on this corruption. CBC deliberately omits Ukrainian corruption and now excuses Freeland's obvious conflict-of-interest Actual journalists would as why Freeland isn't stepping down immediately but the CBC needs to prop up the Liberals

CBC has been reporting all day as if Freeland's working as an MP and at the same time an advisor to Zelenskyy was is some way legitimate and legal... blaming "Conservatives" for her announced departure This isn't impartial journalism Even more troubling, CBC has yet to report on the recent Zelenskyy corruption - CBC viewers had to find out from an Atlantic Council senior fellow (below) that his ministers were involved in a pay for vote scandal and that was ALL CBC allowed on this corruption. CBC deliberately omits Ukrainian corruption and now excuses Freeland's obvious conflict-of-interest Actual journalists would as why Freeland isn't stepping down immediately but the CBC needs to prop up the Liberals

cbcwatcher

103,220 次观看 • 7 个月前

European journalism in all its glory But the Lithuanian Foreign Minister Budrys is not far behind. He calls for preparing for war with Russia. - Yesterday President Putin again threatened Europe with war. What is behind these threats now, and how should Europe respond to this new rhetoric again? - He is demonstrating his readiness to intervene in a larger conflict with NATO. And there are two points here. First, of course, his words need to be divided by two, and then by ten. When we listen to him, one reason is, of course, propaganda. And it is an attempt to intimidate us. On the other hand, we must also take his words seriously. He says he is preparing for war if we ‘want’ it. For us, this is a signal that we must ensure our readiness. This concerns not only capabilities but also the level of readiness. - SK

European journalism in all its glory But the Lithuanian Foreign Minister Budrys is not far behind. He calls for preparing for war with Russia. - Yesterday President Putin again threatened Europe with war. What is behind these threats now, and how should Europe respond to this new rhetoric again? - He is demonstrating his readiness to intervene in a larger conflict with NATO. And there are two points here. First, of course, his words need to be divided by two, and then by ten. When we listen to him, one reason is, of course, propaganda. And it is an attempt to intimidate us. On the other hand, we must also take his words seriously. He says he is preparing for war if we ‘want’ it. For us, this is a signal that we must ensure our readiness. This concerns not only capabilities but also the level of readiness. - SK

Zlatti71

17,715 次观看 • 8 个月前

Elon Musk: The cumulative voice of the people should decide what's newsworthy. “In times past, we didn't have the technology for this, so the only way to learn news was for it to be filtered through a small number of news organizations and then to be printed in newspapers or broadcast. There wasn't really any way that people could speak to each other or communicate with each other. But now there is, because people can be online. I'm a big believer in citizen journalism being actually way better. At first, citizen journalism may sound like, well, doesn't that mean just a whole bunch of amateurs are doing journalism? No, actually, it's way better because if you have actual experts in the field saying things that's way better than a journalist, if you have people who are actually at the event, live. Look at the attempted assassination of President Trump, people actually at the event live, doing video, people are reporting it. That's the kind of thing that is actually far better information than filtering it through a small number of publications, which ends up being controlled by maybe five editors-in-chief. There's like five people that control the news. And even though there are multiple newspapers, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, a few others, they decide what is newsworthy. But that should not be how it works. It should be the voice of the people, the cumulative voice of the people should decide what is newsworthy.” Philadelphia, October 18, 2024

Elon Musk: The cumulative voice of the people should decide what's newsworthy. “In times past, we didn't have the technology for this, so the only way to learn news was for it to be filtered through a small number of news organizations and then to be printed in newspapers or broadcast. There wasn't really any way that people could speak to each other or communicate with each other. But now there is, because people can be online. I'm a big believer in citizen journalism being actually way better. At first, citizen journalism may sound like, well, doesn't that mean just a whole bunch of amateurs are doing journalism? No, actually, it's way better because if you have actual experts in the field saying things that's way better than a journalist, if you have people who are actually at the event, live. Look at the attempted assassination of President Trump, people actually at the event live, doing video, people are reporting it. That's the kind of thing that is actually far better information than filtering it through a small number of publications, which ends up being controlled by maybe five editors-in-chief. There's like five people that control the news. And even though there are multiple newspapers, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, a few others, they decide what is newsworthy. But that should not be how it works. It should be the voice of the people, the cumulative voice of the people should decide what is newsworthy.” Philadelphia, October 18, 2024

ELON CLIPS

20,819,970 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨This is an URGENT call for action After 14 years of providing fearless, independent investigative journalism that holds the military-industrial complex accountable, MintPress is now at risk of shutting down. THE CRISIS: 🚨Our main line of funding has been cut But MintPress has also been targeted in other ways 👇 • PayPal banned us and seized our funds • GoFundMe removed our fundraisers and banned us from their platform • Our journalists have been detained, interrogated, blacklisted, and surveilled • Project Google Owl targeted us and deranked our website from search results in 2017 •Google, Twitter, Meta have algorithmically shadowbanned us •TikTok banned us • The Israel lobby, special interest groups & a mafia of pro-NATO editors sabotage our Wikipedia page • Plus other ongoing censorship attacks from powerful interests we expose ... WHY WE'RE AT RISK: For years, reader donations and fundraising have been the lifeblood that keeps MintPress News alive. Now, with multiple platforms banning us and critical funding sources disappearing, we're fighting to survive. Big Tech and powerful government agencies don't want us to continue exposing war profiteers, government corruption, and corporate malfeasance. But we believe journalism is not a crime—and the truth deserves to be told.

🚨This is an URGENT call for action After 14 years of providing fearless, independent investigative journalism that holds the military-industrial complex accountable, MintPress is now at risk of shutting down. THE CRISIS: 🚨Our main line of funding has been cut But MintPress has also been targeted in other ways 👇 • PayPal banned us and seized our funds • GoFundMe removed our fundraisers and banned us from their platform • Our journalists have been detained, interrogated, blacklisted, and surveilled • Project Google Owl targeted us and deranked our website from search results in 2017 •Google, Twitter, Meta have algorithmically shadowbanned us •TikTok banned us • The Israel lobby, special interest groups & a mafia of pro-NATO editors sabotage our Wikipedia page • Plus other ongoing censorship attacks from powerful interests we expose ... WHY WE'RE AT RISK: For years, reader donations and fundraising have been the lifeblood that keeps MintPress News alive. Now, with multiple platforms banning us and critical funding sources disappearing, we're fighting to survive. Big Tech and powerful government agencies don't want us to continue exposing war profiteers, government corruption, and corporate malfeasance. But we believe journalism is not a crime—and the truth deserves to be told.

MintPress News

659,227 次观看 • 11 个月前

Let me tell you why it’s becoming harder than ever to distinguish between objective journalism and opinion-driven activism—and why that matters for the country. From Washington, D.C. to newsrooms and media platforms across the United States, I break down how political messaging is amplified, repeated, and often unchallenged—blurring the line between reporting and advocacy. I argue that when the same narratives are echoed across networks without real scrutiny, it shapes public perception in ways most people don’t even realize. This isn’t just about politics—it’s about trust. If audiences can’t tell the difference between facts and opinions, between reporting and agenda, then the entire information system starts to break down. And when that happens, it becomes harder for Americans to make informed decisions about the issues that affect their lives. Rumble: YouTube:

Let me tell you why it’s becoming harder than ever to distinguish between objective journalism and opinion-driven activism—and why that matters for the country. From Washington, D.C. to newsrooms and media platforms across the United States, I break down how political messaging is amplified, repeated, and often unchallenged—blurring the line between reporting and advocacy. I argue that when the same narratives are echoed across networks without real scrutiny, it shapes public perception in ways most people don’t even realize. This isn’t just about politics—it’s about trust. If audiences can’t tell the difference between facts and opinions, between reporting and agenda, then the entire information system starts to break down. And when that happens, it becomes harder for Americans to make informed decisions about the issues that affect their lives. Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

17,350 次观看 • 3 个月前

EXCLUSIVE: Sat Parhar Made Police Chief by Board He Chaired, Before Any Conduct Rules Were in Place Government records show that when the board Satpal Singh Parhar once chaired announced him as Alberta’s first Chief of Police on July 2, no code of conduct was in force to prevent a conflict of interest in appointing its own former chairman. This raises questions about what kind of “rigorous, merit-based” hiring process was used by a board that had no Code of Conduct in place at the time — and ultimately selected its own chairman. Will Albertans have an accountable, transparent, and lawful police force loyal to the public that pays them, or an unaccountable force loyal to Chief Parhar—raising concerns about the integrity of death investigations, the risk of organized crime infiltration, and the trust of security agencies who must share intelligence essential to Albertans’ safety. Alberta's UCP government — specifically Minister Mike Ellis — has not responded to repeated media inquiries regarding this matter. Stay tuned for more exclusive investigative journalism you won't find anywhere else Media Bezirgan

EXCLUSIVE: Sat Parhar Made Police Chief by Board He Chaired, Before Any Conduct Rules Were in Place Government records show that when the board Satpal Singh Parhar once chaired announced him as Alberta’s first Chief of Police on July 2, no code of conduct was in force to prevent a conflict of interest in appointing its own former chairman. This raises questions about what kind of “rigorous, merit-based” hiring process was used by a board that had no Code of Conduct in place at the time — and ultimately selected its own chairman. Will Albertans have an accountable, transparent, and lawful police force loyal to the public that pays them, or an unaccountable force loyal to Chief Parhar—raising concerns about the integrity of death investigations, the risk of organized crime infiltration, and the trust of security agencies who must share intelligence essential to Albertans’ safety. Alberta's UCP government — specifically Minister Mike Ellis — has not responded to repeated media inquiries regarding this matter. Stay tuned for more exclusive investigative journalism you won't find anywhere else Media Bezirgan

Mocha Bezirgan 🇨🇦

18,422 次观看 • 1 年前

Putin’s Next Move Could Redraw the Entire Ukraine War As Ukraine escalates its strikes on Russian civilian infrastructure and targets inside Moscow, the pressure on Putin to retaliate is building fast. Russia has now warned Western governments, including the United States, to pull diplomats and military personnel out of Kyiv, signaling a potential major escalation on the horizon. If Moscow goes big on retaliation, what does that response actually look like? And just how far could this conflict spread from here? Dave DeCamp joins us to break it down.

Putin’s Next Move Could Redraw the Entire Ukraine War As Ukraine escalates its strikes on Russian civilian infrastructure and targets inside Moscow, the pressure on Putin to retaliate is building fast. Russia has now warned Western governments, including the United States, to pull diplomats and military personnel out of Kyiv, signaling a potential major escalation on the horizon. If Moscow goes big on retaliation, what does that response actually look like? And just how far could this conflict spread from here? Dave DeCamp joins us to break it down.

Redacted

27,249 次观看 • 1 个月前

Remember how last week I told you, for the second time, that Aidan was Jess’s “source,” the same source she totally made up and built an elaborate fake story around, complete with her pretend day-long “authentication process”? (That even gave herself a pat on the back for 🤭) Yeah. I wasn’t bluffing. I wanted to give them another week to dig their graves a little deeper and keep lying. And they did. Here are the receipts: Aidan himself asking Jess to pretend he’s an anonymous source so she could leak the Flipperhead/Olivia audio for him. Accompanied with my texts begging him NOT to give her the Karen audio because it’s wrong and she absolutely cannot be trusted, something even he knew. This isn’t journalism. This is two adults inventing sources out of thin air. This is mental illness. At this point I’ve done more real journalism in a week than Jess has managed in her entire “career.” If exposing her fake sources counts as journalism, then I guess I’m press-credentialed now🤷🏼‍♀️ And trust me, we’re nowhere near done here. PS- “He did not ask me to do it.” -Jessica Machado , 3 days ago See below for Fake Journalist Parts 1 & 2, complete with clips of Jess lying about her “anonymous source” and the long, elaborate stories she invented to sell that lie:

Remember how last week I told you, for the second time, that Aidan was Jess’s “source,” the same source she totally made up and built an elaborate fake story around, complete with her pretend day-long “authentication process”? (That even gave herself a pat on the back for 🤭) Yeah. I wasn’t bluffing. I wanted to give them another week to dig their graves a little deeper and keep lying. And they did. Here are the receipts: Aidan himself asking Jess to pretend he’s an anonymous source so she could leak the Flipperhead/Olivia audio for him. Accompanied with my texts begging him NOT to give her the Karen audio because it’s wrong and she absolutely cannot be trusted, something even he knew. This isn’t journalism. This is two adults inventing sources out of thin air. This is mental illness. At this point I’ve done more real journalism in a week than Jess has managed in her entire “career.” If exposing her fake sources counts as journalism, then I guess I’m press-credentialed now🤷🏼‍♀️ And trust me, we’re nowhere near done here. PS- “He did not ask me to do it.” -Jessica Machado , 3 days ago See below for Fake Journalist Parts 1 & 2, complete with clips of Jess lying about her “anonymous source” and the long, elaborate stories she invented to sell that lie:

The old M can’t come to the phone right now

75,685 次观看 • 8 个月前