Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

WHAT IF THE $300K WAS NEVER ABOUT THE DEBATE? Here’s a different angle worth asking. Andrew Wilson reportedly put up $300,000 to debate Candace Owens, and Patrick Bet-David moderated the August 14 showdown. But watching it, Andrew looked strangely underprepared for somebody willing to put that kind of money...

229,889 просмотров • 28 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🔥🚨BREAKING: It has been confirmed that this document accusing Catturd and other conservatives of being paid by TPUSA to attack Candace Owens is 100% fake. The creators listed have denied the claims are demanding proof be shown, there are also big creators claiming they were offered payments. As of now 0 of them have provided proof of these claims outside of a tweet with no image, no data, no citations. The truth is, people view Erika Kirk as a grieving widow and Candace Owens is investigating a widow whose husband was loved by everyone that is fed up with Owens. Not all backlash is paid for, this was manipulation to discredit anyone that has a problem and that in itself is evil. We have a massive responsibility with these brands, it sickens me to witness misinformation being sent out to discredit people with valid questions. If she is allowed to question and criticize the wife of a man we all watched get assassinated without being accused of being paid to do so despite her monetizing each episode it would be delusional and disingenuous to claim anyone that questions and criticizes her is compromised. Don’t fall victim to the information war, the same people that think the know what is going on thought they knew what was happening in 2020, when they acted like the election wasn’t stolen, the same people that say you’re owned by Israel spent the last decade getting paid millions by them when it was convenient and acceptable and even helped destroy people who called it out. DON’T BELIEVE THESE EVIL PEOPLE, they are leaves in the wind blowing each direction until they hit the ground. Also why didn’t anyone request for reviews of the meta data from this word document or the original email @? Or even the name of the person who organized it, maybe they also should be asking what was the posting window for this campaign? And last but not least, why does this extremely important campaign not have the amount per post/impression listed? EVERY campaign has this.

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

721,235 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Perrie admits she’s “frustrated” by how Jesy Nelson has portrayed the breakdown of her relationship with Little Mix, adding that she feels the group consistently tried supporting Jesy at the cost of their own mental health, and that accountability should be taken on all sides: “Sometimes you just won’t win with people. And what annoys me the most… I have to be careful how I say this because I don’t want to seem like a bitch… But what upsets me the most when situations like this happen is when the other person doesn’t take any accountability. That boils my blood. I’m not blaming everything on you [Jesy]. I’m not saying, ‘She’s this fucking monster and everything was her fault’ and blah blah blah. But take some accountability for your actions and realise you were difficult. You did have difficult moments. Granted, there were reasons for those moments... but you can only pick somebody up so many fucking times before you start losing track of your own sanity. You want to be there for that person, but if they can’t accept the help and they can’t accept the love you’re trying to show, how do you win? You can’t. I hate that. I don’t like putting the blame on people. Don’t put the blame on me and make me out to be something that I’m not. Yes, I’m not perfect. I might not have been there enough, or I could have done better I suppose… but I thought what I was doing was enough. I thought I’d tried everything. So to then sit there in further interviews and discuss it publicly and be like, ‘I wasn’t supported’… You were, though. You were. So just take some accountability and I’ll feel better about it. I’d say [I’m] more frustrated than angry, because I don’t like being painted into a person that I’m not. Because I’m an open book, I have to be real. It exhausts me when I see people that I know inside and out not being genuine. It frustrates me.”

JADE tea room ☕️

299,076 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Apparently, I saw this video online and I decided to share. What this worker is applying is called bitumen, or what many of us know as bituminous coating. Most people think a wall is a solid, impenetrable block, but in reality, it is more like a sponge. Concrete and blocks have microscopic pores that pull water from the earth through a process we call capillary action. This thick black substance is the shield that stops that water from climbing up into the house. It is not about making the wall look good because this part will be buried under the dirt forever. It is about creating a skin that water cannot breathe through. When do you need to do this? The need for this arises because the soil is a very aggressive environment. Water is not your only enemy.. The ground also contains salts and sulfates that want to eat away at the cement. If this moisture finds its way to the steel bars inside the columns, those bars will start to rust. And when steel rusts, it expands, and that expansion is what cracks the concrete from the inside out. This coating is the only thing standing between your foundation and that kind of slow destruction. Thats is why if you see wet patches at the bottom of your walls inside your house, it usually means someone skipped this step or did it poorly during construction. You can apply this anytime you are building parts of a structure that will stay in contact with the ground. It is common in areas where the water table is high or where the soil stays damp for most of the year. This is a one-shot opportunity. Once you backfill the soil, you can never go back to fix it without a lot of expense and a lot of digging. It is about having the foresight to protect the heart of the building while it is still exposed. Please don’t ignore this if you need to. If you ignore it now to save a bit of money, you will be funding the future decay of your own home. I hope this helps.

A.Y.O

75,399 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 FLORENTINO PÉREZ ON THE 2026 BALLON D’O. 🎙️ Reporter: “Florentino, do you believe Kylian Mbappé deserves the 2026 Ballon d’Or?” 🗣️ Florentino Pérez: “For me, there is nothing to discuss. Mbappé is the right candidate and not by a small distance. By a huge distance. He had a fantastic season, delivered when Real Madrid needed him most, and then went to the World Cup and finished as the tournament’s top scorer. People can debate football all they want, but when you look at what this man has done on the biggest stage, the answer should be obvious. Messi did not do it. Ronaldo did not do it. Harry Kane did not do it. Other great players have had their moments, but Mbappé has shown that he can carry the expectations of an entire club and country. And let me be very clear: if Mbappé does not win this Ballon d’Or, then I will have serious questions about the criteria. Because every year we hear that the award is about performances, goals, trophies and impact. Fine. Then apply the same rules to Mbappé. I have enormous respect for Lamine Yamal and Raphinha. They are fantastic players, and I would be happy to have them at Real Madrid. But when you ask me who is the best candidate for the Ballon d’Or, I don’t hesitate. Mbappé. By distance. If people want to tell me otherwise, they need to explain what exactly they are rewarding. And if he loses despite everything he has achieved, Real Madrid supporters will naturally ask themselves: What more does a Real Madrid player have to do to win this award? I don’t want to talk about agendas. But if the best candidate keeps being overlooked, eventually people will start asking uncomfortable questions. For me, there is no debate. Kylian Mbappé deserves the 2026 Ballon d’Or.”

CentreGoalHQ

28,216 просмотров • 7 дней назад

I know many people have seen this video but I’d like to break it down a bit. I found this interesting for the timeline I’ve been putting together. Many of you have seen it. I’ll publish it again soon updated. Mark met Candace before she was anyone at TPUsa? Back in early 2017 at a TPUsa event? This is when she started doing her YouTube videos that took off. Was she stalking conservative events and high profile people to get into the circle? Did she stalk Charlie for months at events? Interesting. I remember her talking once about running around a TPUsa event handing out her cards to people so they’d know who she was. And then when Mark met her he offered to help her financially by giving her 1k a month for her bills. By just meeting her at an event? Because he was impressed with her. And thought she had potential. And she wasn’t a TpUSA employee? She’s good at manipulating for sure then. Then Charlie hires her at TPUsa in November about 6 months later then when Mark met her. That seems to be when she sent Mark the vile text saying she didn’t want to ever talk to him again with no explanation. I think it’s because she didn’t need him anymore. She succeeded in getting Charlie to hire her. It lines up. Then he says Charlie and him are hunting while the Kanye blowup is going on. So it’s really early in the Candace saga when Charlie says he needs to apologize for something. That people don’t change meaning Candace. That was Oct 2018. He says on that trip it was obvious Candace and Charlie had issues. Remember Candace was fired in May of 2019 from TPUsa. So Candace was being vicious from the beginning? I bet she was the one blowing up his phone in this clip. I wonder how long after Charlie hired Candace he regretted it. I bet immediately but he had her sign a contract the day he met her so he was locked in. My question is all this is was she stalking TPUsa events to get hired before Dave Rubin introduced Charle and Candace? Dave met her in early 2017 too. Mark says he tried to warn PragerU and DW about her. And that PragerU ended ugly. Why would these companies hire her after they saw what she had done at TPUsa. That will always confuse me. No matter how popular someone is if your friends are telling you she’s psychotic why would you invite that in? Just thinking out loud. So she’s made enemies with Dave, Mark, Dennis, Jeremy, Andrew, Blake, Mikey and everyone that she’s come into contact with. They all say she’s psycho. But she’s not the problem? Anyone see a pattern? Common denominator?

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

12,435 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад