正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

What is free speech? Is it an outdated idea? What about hate speech? Host Nadine Strossen is joined by free speech experts, critics, and defenders to examine its power and controversy historically and today. Stream Free to Speak now on CiVL

CiVL

1,947 subscribers

3,761,213 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

教育新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

CiVL 的头像

CiVL2 年前

Watch the 3 part series for free:

Christian Swensen 的头像

Christian Swensen2 年前

Hate speech is simply anything that a leftist doesn't like. That's it.

Sticks_and_stones 的头像

Sticks_and_stones2 年前

All speech is free speech. It is the responsibility of the adult listening to discern what is true and valid for themself.

writing and thunder 的头像

writing and thunder2 年前

Do you need another adult to tell you what you can’t say?

pkevvette 的头像

pkevvette2 年前

No. It's a constitutional right , fascist

Greg Steven 的头像

Greg Steven2 年前

Hate speech is a made up term used to limit free speech

kmFoCo 的头像

kmFoCo2 年前

I am pro free speech, especially the speech I don’t agree with. Anyone against this, you aren’t for free speech. You want a thought police to tell you what to think, what to believe, what say. You are against being free. I don’t need to list to some so called “experts”.

Juanita Campbell 的头像

Juanita Campbell2 年前

What about spreading lies as free speech 🎤

CiVL 的头像

CiVL2 年前

The best way to combat lies is with truths.

SW 的头像

SW2 年前

There is no such thing as freedom without freedom of speech.

相关视频

Ep. 256: Ten arguments against free speech Greg Lukianoff and Nadine Strossen join Nico Perrino to discuss ten common arguments against free speech and why they fail. Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 01:18 Book’s origins 04:25 Argument #1: Words are violence 20:27 Argument #2: Words are dangerous 25:09 Argument #3: Hate speech isn’t free speech 31:06 Argument #4: About shoutdowns 37:18 Argument #5: Free speech is outdated 45:41 Argument #6 Free speech is right-wing 50:14 Argument #7: About the crowded theater and marketplace of ideas 59:27 Argument #9: Misinformation and disinformation 01:03:53 Argument #8: Free speech protects power 01:09:30 Argument #10: About the Holocaust and Rwandan genocide 01:13:35 Outro

Ep. 256: Ten arguments against free speech Greg Lukianoff and Nadine Strossen join Nico Perrino to discuss ten common arguments against free speech and why they fail. Timestamps: 00:00 Intro 01:18 Book’s origins 04:25 Argument #1: Words are violence 20:27 Argument #2: Words are dangerous 25:09 Argument #3: Hate speech isn’t free speech 31:06 Argument #4: About shoutdowns 37:18 Argument #5: Free speech is outdated 45:41 Argument #6 Free speech is right-wing 50:14 Argument #7: About the crowded theater and marketplace of ideas 59:27 Argument #9: Misinformation and disinformation 01:03:53 Argument #8: Free speech protects power 01:09:30 Argument #10: About the Holocaust and Rwandan genocide 01:13:35 Outro

So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast

15,660 次观看 • 8 个月前

French President Macron: I do believe in free speech. But what does it mean? Free speech means I will listen to you, you will listen to me, and we are in an equal relationship. A lot of people defending free speech do it based on algorithms without any transparency, with a lot of bias, and with their own political agenda. It's not free speech. And when people clearly help hate speech, racist speech to be spread all over the place, it's not about free speech. It's a jungle. I really believe in free speech based on respect and transparency.

French President Macron: I do believe in free speech. But what does it mean? Free speech means I will listen to you, you will listen to me, and we are in an equal relationship. A lot of people defending free speech do it based on algorithms without any transparency, with a lot of bias, and with their own political agenda. It's not free speech. And when people clearly help hate speech, racist speech to be spread all over the place, it's not about free speech. It's a jungle. I really believe in free speech based on respect and transparency.

Clash Report

787,360 次观看 • 4 个月前

French President Macron: I do believe in free speech. But what does it mean? Free speech means I will listen to you, you will listen to me, and we are in an equal relationship. A lot of people defending free speech do it based on algorithms without any transparency, with a lot of bias, and with their own political agenda. It's not free speech. And when people clearly help hate speech, racist speech to be spread all over the place, it's not about free speech. It's a jungle. I really believe in free speech based on respect and transparency.

French President Macron: I do believe in free speech. But what does it mean? Free speech means I will listen to you, you will listen to me, and we are in an equal relationship. A lot of people defending free speech do it based on algorithms without any transparency, with a lot of bias, and with their own political agenda. It's not free speech. And when people clearly help hate speech, racist speech to be spread all over the place, it's not about free speech. It's a jungle. I really believe in free speech based on respect and transparency.

Open Source Intel

63,018 次观看 • 4 个月前

This is wrong. This is an assault on free speech. This is our government using its power to censor and silence its critics like Jimmy Kimmel. Donald Trump continues to undermine our constitution, our freedoms, and our democracy.

This is wrong. This is an assault on free speech. This is our government using its power to censor and silence its critics like Jimmy Kimmel. Donald Trump continues to undermine our constitution, our freedoms, and our democracy.

Cory Booker

273,621 次观看 • 9 个月前

BASH: Trump is really redefining free speech as speech that is only favorable to him. I can't imagine you're comfortable with that as somebody who swore an oath to the Constitution and a pretty prominent part of the Constitution is the right to free speech MULLIN: He didn't say free speech. He said cheating, and what he was referring to are elections BASH: No. That's not what he was talking about

BASH: Trump is really redefining free speech as speech that is only favorable to him. I can't imagine you're comfortable with that as somebody who swore an oath to the Constitution and a pretty prominent part of the Constitution is the right to free speech MULLIN: He didn't say free speech. He said cheating, and what he was referring to are elections BASH: No. That's not what he was talking about

Aaron Rupar

287,012 次观看 • 9 个月前

"The solution to hate speech is more free speech" - Charlie Kirk

"The solution to hate speech is more free speech" - Charlie Kirk

Kim Iversen 🇺🇸

29,573 次观看 • 9 个月前

🧵 1/ The Zionist War on Free Speech in Australia The Misinformation and Disinformation bill is dead, which is certainly a victory for free speech, but what the political Right will never admit is that Zionists are the biggest threat to free speech in Australia.

🧵 1/ The Zionist War on Free Speech in Australia The Misinformation and Disinformation bill is dead, which is certainly a victory for free speech, but what the political Right will never admit is that Zionists are the biggest threat to free speech in Australia.

Zack Ozbro 🇦🇺🤝🇵🇸

52,172 次观看 • 1 年前

“There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech”. Wow, never heard that one before. If it wasn’t already, it should be clear to everyone by one that the Trump administration doesn’t give a shit about free speech; indeed, on Israel-Gaza, they’ve been cracking down on free speech on an unprecedented scale. This is why its faux outrage (Vance’s little speech) at censorship in Europe and elsewhere — though the latter is a very real problem — is clearly not based on a principled stance but is simply a tool through which to advance certain strategic goals that have a nothing whatsoever to do with free speech, as I explained in a recent interview about our report on the French censorship-industrial complex. Full interview here:

“There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech”. Wow, never heard that one before. If it wasn’t already, it should be clear to everyone by one that the Trump administration doesn’t give a shit about free speech; indeed, on Israel-Gaza, they’ve been cracking down on free speech on an unprecedented scale. This is why its faux outrage (Vance’s little speech) at censorship in Europe and elsewhere — though the latter is a very real problem — is clearly not based on a principled stance but is simply a tool through which to advance certain strategic goals that have a nothing whatsoever to do with free speech, as I explained in a recent interview about our report on the French censorship-industrial complex. Full interview here:

Thomas Fazi

17,514 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 Rep. Ro Khanna Defends ArabCon, Mocks Critics of “Pro-Terror Radicals” At ArabCon, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) opened by taunting critics of the conference: “So where are the pro-terror radicals? Raise your hand if you're a pro-terror radical.” He went on to frame the backlash as an attack on free speech: “What happened to the First Amendment? You know what happened to the free speech? Free speech, if you agree with me, but not free speech, if you go speak at ArabCon. Come on, I actually believe in free speech consistently.” And he pointed to campuses: “What's going on in our university campuses with people who are criticizing foreign policy and then getting harassed, that's not standing up for free speech.”

🚨 Rep. Ro Khanna Defends ArabCon, Mocks Critics of “Pro-Terror Radicals” At ArabCon, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) opened by taunting critics of the conference: “So where are the pro-terror radicals? Raise your hand if you're a pro-terror radical.” He went on to frame the backlash as an attack on free speech: “What happened to the First Amendment? You know what happened to the free speech? Free speech, if you agree with me, but not free speech, if you go speak at ArabCon. Come on, I actually believe in free speech consistently.” And he pointed to campuses: “What's going on in our university campuses with people who are criticizing foreign policy and then getting harassed, that's not standing up for free speech.”

Stu Smith

53,646 次观看 • 9 个月前

AG Todd Blanche on free speech: Reporter: For critics who say, where does free speech end an actual threat of violence begin? Blanche: I don’t know what critics say that especially today.

AG Todd Blanche on free speech: Reporter: For critics who say, where does free speech end an actual threat of violence begin? Blanche: I don’t know what critics say that especially today.

Acyn

42,163 次观看 • 2 个月前

'Hate Speech' is Free Speech - Simple! - Montgomery Toms

'Hate Speech' is Free Speech - Simple! - Montgomery Toms

Freedom Watch

10,658 次观看 • 3 个月前

AG Pam Bondi: "There's free speech, and then there's hate speech. And there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society. We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech."

AG Pam Bondi: "There's free speech, and then there's hate speech. And there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society. We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech."

TheBlaze

8,266,321 次观看 • 9 个月前

Attorney General Pam Bondi: "There's free speech and then there's hate speech, and there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society...We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech."

Attorney General Pam Bondi: "There's free speech and then there's hate speech, and there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie, in our society...We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech."

The Bulwark

29,720,582 次观看 • 9 个月前

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke says he is not concerned about the chilling effect the hate speech laws may have on free speech, arguing the laws are needed to stop racist bigotry and that the so called "free speech brigade" simply needs to get over it.

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke says he is not concerned about the chilling effect the hate speech laws may have on free speech, arguing the laws are needed to stop racist bigotry and that the so called "free speech brigade" simply needs to get over it.

Anthony Khallouf

77,987 次观看 • 5 个月前

Pam Bondi is now using Charlie Kirk's death to oppress free speech under the guise of hate speech, but is this what Charlie would have wanted? Breanna Morello breaks it all down:

Pam Bondi is now using Charlie Kirk's death to oppress free speech under the guise of hate speech, but is this what Charlie would have wanted? Breanna Morello breaks it all down:

INFOWARS

17,265 次观看 • 9 个月前

New episode: Pam Bondi says hate speech is not free speech — is she right? FIRE staff (Nico Perrino, Sarah McLaughlin, & Aaron Terr) also take your questions on Charlie Kirk's assassination, President Trump's lawsuit against The New York Times, cancel culture, and more. 00:00 Intro 01:42 Attorney General Pam Bondi's comments that "hate speech" is distinct from "free speech" 02:23 Is it OK for the Department of Justice to target people for "hate speech"? 05:42 How have “hate speech” laws played out overseas? 07:19 President Trump's response to Pam Bondi's “hate speech” remarks 08:50 Are “fighting words,” “incitement,” and “true threats” free speech? 11:22 What about doxxing? 15:15 Is it free speech to celebrate or condone the assassination of Charlie Kirk? 21:52 The termination of k-12 and university faculty in response to their commentary on Kirk's assassination 28:40 Is there a law that might implicate the Discord users who had reason to be aware of malicious intentions the shooter had towards Kirk ahead of the assassination? 30:05 The agency of speakers and those hearing their speech under the incitement standard 31:14 What are the differences between the free speech rights of citizens and non-citizens? 36:20 Does a court filing by President Trump as an individual in the New York Times lawsuit open him up to being deposed about a wide range of behaviors and actions? 37:40 What is the Trump's administration's legal strategy with the New York Times lawsuit? 39:24 What is FIRE doing about private employees being fired for their political commentary? 46:50 What is Charlie Kirk's legacy on free speech? 50:04 What is the difference between the academic protections enjoyed by tenured and non-tenured faculty members? 52:05 Does FIRE trust the Supreme Court to protect free speech? 56:12 How can we prevent capitulation from The New York Times? 59:20 How can ordinary people safely express their opinions on social media and promote civil discourse?

New episode: Pam Bondi says hate speech is not free speech — is she right? FIRE staff (Nico Perrino, Sarah McLaughlin, & Aaron Terr) also take your questions on Charlie Kirk's assassination, President Trump's lawsuit against The New York Times, cancel culture, and more. 00:00 Intro 01:42 Attorney General Pam Bondi's comments that "hate speech" is distinct from "free speech" 02:23 Is it OK for the Department of Justice to target people for "hate speech"? 05:42 How have “hate speech” laws played out overseas? 07:19 President Trump's response to Pam Bondi's “hate speech” remarks 08:50 Are “fighting words,” “incitement,” and “true threats” free speech? 11:22 What about doxxing? 15:15 Is it free speech to celebrate or condone the assassination of Charlie Kirk? 21:52 The termination of k-12 and university faculty in response to their commentary on Kirk's assassination 28:40 Is there a law that might implicate the Discord users who had reason to be aware of malicious intentions the shooter had towards Kirk ahead of the assassination? 30:05 The agency of speakers and those hearing their speech under the incitement standard 31:14 What are the differences between the free speech rights of citizens and non-citizens? 36:20 Does a court filing by President Trump as an individual in the New York Times lawsuit open him up to being deposed about a wide range of behaviors and actions? 37:40 What is the Trump's administration's legal strategy with the New York Times lawsuit? 39:24 What is FIRE doing about private employees being fired for their political commentary? 46:50 What is Charlie Kirk's legacy on free speech? 50:04 What is the difference between the academic protections enjoyed by tenured and non-tenured faculty members? 52:05 Does FIRE trust the Supreme Court to protect free speech? 56:12 How can we prevent capitulation from The New York Times? 59:20 How can ordinary people safely express their opinions on social media and promote civil discourse?

So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast

31,314 次观看 • 9 个月前

So today I asked Joey Barton if free speech is dying in this country and this is what he had to say.

So today I asked Joey Barton if free speech is dying in this country and this is what he had to say.

Jack Roworth

663,825 次观看 • 6 个月前

We asked Free Speech Union (🗣 Free Speech Union ✊) CEO Jonathan Ayling his thoughts on Donald Trump’s US election victory and what it could mean for free speech.

We asked Free Speech Union (🗣 Free Speech Union ✊) CEO Jonathan Ayling his thoughts on Donald Trump’s US election victory and what it could mean for free speech.

REALITY CHECK RADIO

20,941 次观看 • 1 年前