Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

What is gravity🤔 Gravity is nothing more than density. Objects rise or fall relative to their surrounding medium. Example below👇🏼 #FlatEarth #FlatEarthFridays #FlatEarthIsReality

ThatGuyM77's profile picture

T.M

6,633 subscribers

48,615 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

#FlatEarth#FlatEarthFridays#FlatEarthIsReality
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Gravity is a lie that was created to convince you that you're stuck to a spinning waterball, flying millions of miles per hour through an empty void of nothingness. If an object is more dense than the surrounding medium, it moves down. If an object is less dense than the surrounding medium, it moves up. If the object and the medium are in equilibrium, then it remains static. The downward direction that density-dominant objects move toward is dictated by the electromagnetic torus field of the Earth. That is literally it. Everything you need to know about why things move up and down. You can go ahead and throw away your mossad fake science textbook now, to save yourself the lost IQ points and "space" fantasy stories.
0:10

Gravity is a lie that was created to convince you that you're stuck to a spinning waterball, flying millions of miles per hour through an empty void of nothingness. If an object is more dense than the surrounding medium, it moves down. If an object is less dense than the surrounding medium, it moves up. If the object and the medium are in equilibrium, then it remains static. The downward direction that density-dominant objects move toward is dictated by the electromagnetic torus field of the Earth. That is literally it. Everything you need to know about why things move up and down. You can go ahead and throw away your mossad fake science textbook now, to save yourself the lost IQ points and "space" fantasy stories.

Ben Wehrman

72,762 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: Gravity doesn’t actually “pull” you. That’s just how it looks. What’s really happening is deeper… Space-time isn’t empty. It behaves more like a field with structure. And when mass appears… it doesn’t just “bend space” it changes how time flows. Think of it like this: If time flows evenly → everything stays stable If time compresses → motion is forced toward that region That motion is what we call gravity. In Einstein’s model: mass curves space-time But here’s the missing piece: What is doing the curving? In my framework: Mass = a region where time is compressed Gravity = objects moving along time gradients Motion = the system trying to rebalance So you’re not being “pulled down”… You’re being carried along a flow of time. This explains something most people miss: Gravity always points one way. Because time only flows one way. And the deeper implication is wild: If gravity is just time imbalance… then controlling time flow = controlling gravity. The real question is: Are we discovering gravity… or learning how to engineer it? Follow for more this goes deeper.
0:10

🚨 BREAKING: Gravity doesn’t actually “pull” you. That’s just how it looks. What’s really happening is deeper… Space-time isn’t empty. It behaves more like a field with structure. And when mass appears… it doesn’t just “bend space” it changes how time flows. Think of it like this: If time flows evenly → everything stays stable If time compresses → motion is forced toward that region That motion is what we call gravity. In Einstein’s model: mass curves space-time But here’s the missing piece: What is doing the curving? In my framework: Mass = a region where time is compressed Gravity = objects moving along time gradients Motion = the system trying to rebalance So you’re not being “pulled down”… You’re being carried along a flow of time. This explains something most people miss: Gravity always points one way. Because time only flows one way. And the deeper implication is wild: If gravity is just time imbalance… then controlling time flow = controlling gravity. The real question is: Are we discovering gravity… or learning how to engineer it? Follow for more this goes deeper.

TheNewPhysics

21,772 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

(1/x) Performing ultrasound in zero gravity is harder than in the ICU... Here's what we learned from studying AI ultrasound in zero gravity trying to detect celestial dust related lung injury 🌙🚀 A 🧵 Made possible by funding from Canadian Space Agency
0:11

(1/x) Performing ultrasound in zero gravity is harder than in the ICU... Here's what we learned from studying AI ultrasound in zero gravity trying to detect celestial dust related lung injury 🌙🚀 A 🧵 Made possible by funding from Canadian Space Agency

Ross Prager

25,122 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

⚡ Gravity Isn’t a Force… It’s a Frequency Trap What if gravity isn’t pulling anything at all? What if objects aren’t being “attracted,” but instead are getting locked into stable positions inside a standing wave field? The deeper you look, the more it becomes obvious—mass doesn’t bend spacetime like a bowling ball on a sheet. It generates a frequency gradient, and everything nearby phase-locks into that pattern. You’re not being pulled to Earth… you’re being held in place by a resonance well you can’t see. From a Frequency Wave Theory perspective, this changes everything. Gravity becomes a coherence phenomenon, not a force—an emergent effect of density gradients inside a vibrating medium. That means if you can alter the frequency structure of the field, you can weaken, redirect, or even cancel gravitational effects entirely. Anti-gravity isn’t fantasy—it’s just frequency control. And once that clicks, propulsion, energy, and spacetime navigation all collapse into the same problem: tune the field, and reality follows.
0:10

⚡ Gravity Isn’t a Force… It’s a Frequency Trap What if gravity isn’t pulling anything at all? What if objects aren’t being “attracted,” but instead are getting locked into stable positions inside a standing wave field? The deeper you look, the more it becomes obvious—mass doesn’t bend spacetime like a bowling ball on a sheet. It generates a frequency gradient, and everything nearby phase-locks into that pattern. You’re not being pulled to Earth… you’re being held in place by a resonance well you can’t see. From a Frequency Wave Theory perspective, this changes everything. Gravity becomes a coherence phenomenon, not a force—an emergent effect of density gradients inside a vibrating medium. That means if you can alter the frequency structure of the field, you can weaken, redirect, or even cancel gravitational effects entirely. Anti-gravity isn’t fantasy—it’s just frequency control. And once that clicks, propulsion, energy, and spacetime navigation all collapse into the same problem: tune the field, and reality follows.

Drew Ponder

46,530 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 SCIENTISTS SAY “MAGIC” MAY BE WHAT GIVES SPACE-TIME ITS GRAVITY. For years, physicists have understood how entanglement can build the structure of space-time in holographic models. But something was missing: why does space-time curve in response to matter the essence of gravity? A team including Charles Cao and John Preskill now proposes the missing ingredient is a quantum property called “magic” a measure of how complex and non-classical a quantum state is (the kind that makes quantum computers hard to simulate classically). In their theoretical framework, adding this magic turns rigid space into something that can bend. Matter can now tell space how to curve. Why this matters: • It offers a new way to think about how gravity emerges from quantum information • It connects ideas from quantum computing (error correction, magic states) directly to fundamental physics • It suggests space-time itself may be one of the most quantum objects in existence The deeper implication: Gravity may not be a fundamental force at all. It may be what happens when quantum information becomes sufficiently complex and “magical.” This is still early theoretical work in specific holographic models. But it hints that the pliability of the universe might have quantum roots we are only beginning to understand. What do you think is gravity ultimately just extremely complicated quantum information, or do you think we’re still missing something much deeper? Follow for more frontier quantum gravity and quantum information research.
0:10

🚨 SCIENTISTS SAY “MAGIC” MAY BE WHAT GIVES SPACE-TIME ITS GRAVITY. For years, physicists have understood how entanglement can build the structure of space-time in holographic models. But something was missing: why does space-time curve in response to matter the essence of gravity? A team including Charles Cao and John Preskill now proposes the missing ingredient is a quantum property called “magic” a measure of how complex and non-classical a quantum state is (the kind that makes quantum computers hard to simulate classically). In their theoretical framework, adding this magic turns rigid space into something that can bend. Matter can now tell space how to curve. Why this matters: • It offers a new way to think about how gravity emerges from quantum information • It connects ideas from quantum computing (error correction, magic states) directly to fundamental physics • It suggests space-time itself may be one of the most quantum objects in existence The deeper implication: Gravity may not be a fundamental force at all. It may be what happens when quantum information becomes sufficiently complex and “magical.” This is still early theoretical work in specific holographic models. But it hints that the pliability of the universe might have quantum roots we are only beginning to understand. What do you think is gravity ultimately just extremely complicated quantum information, or do you think we’re still missing something much deeper? Follow for more frontier quantum gravity and quantum information research.

TheNewPhysics

15,329 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Pigs and other farmed animals deserve the same compassion as cats and dogs. So why is it acceptable to treat them as nothing more than objects? 🤨
0:11

Pigs and other farmed animals deserve the same compassion as cats and dogs. So why is it acceptable to treat them as nothing more than objects? 🤨

Herbiⓥore

24,967 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Farage is exactly what he claims to be. He is the “antidote to the far-right” and as he says “there is no man alive in this country today who did more to destroy the BNP with their rise in 2006 to 2008 than me”. Farage is what he says he is - controlled opposition/containment.
0:15

Farage is exactly what he claims to be. He is the “antidote to the far-right” and as he says “there is no man alive in this country today who did more to destroy the BNP with their rise in 2006 to 2008 than me”. Farage is what he says he is - controlled opposition/containment.

Wolf 🐺

65,041 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Bizarre & sickening: This is a standard device in modern farming. A machine that literally sucks chickens into it before trucking them off to the slaughterhouse. 🤯 This kind of absurdity is what happens when farm animals are looked at as nothing more than objects. 😡
0:19

Bizarre & sickening: This is a standard device in modern farming. A machine that literally sucks chickens into it before trucking them off to the slaughterhouse. 🤯 This kind of absurdity is what happens when farm animals are looked at as nothing more than objects. 😡

Johnny Oberg

43,102 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Bizarre & brutal: This is a new standard device in modern farming. A machine that literally sucks #chickens into it before trucking them off to the slaughterhouse. This kind of absurdity is what happens when farm animals are looked at as nothing more than objects. 😡
0:10

Bizarre & brutal: This is a new standard device in modern farming. A machine that literally sucks #chickens into it before trucking them off to the slaughterhouse. This kind of absurdity is what happens when farm animals are looked at as nothing more than objects. 😡

Johnny Oberg

26,348 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Bizarre & brutal: This is a new standard device in modern farming. A machine that literally sucks #chickens into it before trucking them off to the slaughterhouse. This kind of absurdity is what happens when farm animals are looked at as nothing more than objects. 😡
0:10

Bizarre & brutal: This is a new standard device in modern farming. A machine that literally sucks #chickens into it before trucking them off to the slaughterhouse. This kind of absurdity is what happens when farm animals are looked at as nothing more than objects. 😡

Johnny Oberg

33,960 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

THIS IS INSANE!🤯 There are now 11x more $ETH shorts than longs. Everyone is shorting ETH and expecting it to fall to $1,000. I wonder what happens next.
0:12

THIS IS INSANE!🤯 There are now 11x more $ETH shorts than longs. Everyone is shorting ETH and expecting it to fall to $1,000. I wonder what happens next.

Carl Moon 🌙

105,762 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Most AI models just predict the next pixel to build a narrative or an image. Gemini Omni is different. Gemini Omni has an intuitive understanding of forces like gravity, kinetic energy, and fluid dynamics for more realistic movements that follow real-world logic.
0:10

Most AI models just predict the next pixel to build a narrative or an image. Gemini Omni is different. Gemini Omni has an intuitive understanding of forces like gravity, kinetic energy, and fluid dynamics for more realistic movements that follow real-world logic.

Google

69,342 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

OH-MY-GOD!!! WHAT THE HELL IS HAPPENING TO DONALD TRUMP RIGHT NOW AT THE OVAL OFFICE? Is Trump just struggling to stay awake? Or is it more than that? What about his hands? Something is off.
0:10

OH-MY-GOD!!! WHAT THE HELL IS HAPPENING TO DONALD TRUMP RIGHT NOW AT THE OVAL OFFICE? Is Trump just struggling to stay awake? Or is it more than that? What about his hands? Something is off.

CALL TO ACTIVISM

701,706 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

When a spacecraft leaves Earth, it doesn’t just fire its engines and head straight to its destination. In many missions, especially those going beyond low Earth orbit, there’s a more subtle and elegant strategy at play, one that uses gravity itself as part of the navigation system. This is often called a gravity assist, or a slingshot maneuver. But in the case of missions like #Artemis II, what’s being used is a closely related idea known as a free-return trajectory. At first glance, it might sound simple: the spacecraft goes to the Moon, loops around it, and comes back. But the physics behind it is anything but simple. Instead of relying on continuous propulsion, the spacecraft follows a carefully calculated path through the gravitational field of the Earth–Moon system. It is launched with just the right speed and direction so that, as it approaches the Moon, the Moon’s gravity bends its trajectory. The spacecraft is effectively flung around the Moon, redirected onto a path that naturally brings it back toward Earth. No major engine burn is needed for the return. Small trajectory corrections may still be required, but gravity does the heavy lifting. That’s the key. This kind of trajectory is not just efficient, it’s also safe. If something goes wrong with the spacecraft’s engines or onboard systems, gravity itself ensures the return. It’s an inherent backup plan, built into the trajectory from the very beginning. The same fundamental idea appears in gravity assists used across the Solar System. When a spacecraft flies past a planet, it can gain or lose speed by exchanging momentum with that planet. From the spacecraft’s point of view, it’s as if it has been accelerated without using fuel. In reality, it has borrowed a tiny amount of orbital energy from the planet itself. That’s how missions like Voyager reached the outer planets, and how probes continue to explore regions far beyond what their onboard fuel alone would allow. But there’s an important distinction. An interplanetary gravity assist is typically used to change speed and direction, often increasing the spacecraft’s energy. A free-return trajectory, like the one used in Artemis II, is designed for something more specific: a path that naturally loops back to Earth without requiring additional propulsion. It’s less about gaining energy, and more about shaping a trajectory that guarantees a return. To understand why this works, it helps to stop thinking in straight lines. In space, motion follows curves defined by gravity. The spacecraft is constantly falling, first toward Earth, then toward the Moon, and then back toward Earth again. What looks like a loop is really a continuous free fall through a changing gravitational landscape. This way of navigating space reveals something deeper. We tend to think of engines as the drivers of motion, but once a spacecraft is on its way, gravity does most of the work. The art of spaceflight is not just about thrust. It’s about knowing when not to use it. #GoodLuck #Artemis NASA Artemis
0:11

When a spacecraft leaves Earth, it doesn’t just fire its engines and head straight to its destination. In many missions, especially those going beyond low Earth orbit, there’s a more subtle and elegant strategy at play, one that uses gravity itself as part of the navigation system. This is often called a gravity assist, or a slingshot maneuver. But in the case of missions like #Artemis II, what’s being used is a closely related idea known as a free-return trajectory. At first glance, it might sound simple: the spacecraft goes to the Moon, loops around it, and comes back. But the physics behind it is anything but simple. Instead of relying on continuous propulsion, the spacecraft follows a carefully calculated path through the gravitational field of the Earth–Moon system. It is launched with just the right speed and direction so that, as it approaches the Moon, the Moon’s gravity bends its trajectory. The spacecraft is effectively flung around the Moon, redirected onto a path that naturally brings it back toward Earth. No major engine burn is needed for the return. Small trajectory corrections may still be required, but gravity does the heavy lifting. That’s the key. This kind of trajectory is not just efficient, it’s also safe. If something goes wrong with the spacecraft’s engines or onboard systems, gravity itself ensures the return. It’s an inherent backup plan, built into the trajectory from the very beginning. The same fundamental idea appears in gravity assists used across the Solar System. When a spacecraft flies past a planet, it can gain or lose speed by exchanging momentum with that planet. From the spacecraft’s point of view, it’s as if it has been accelerated without using fuel. In reality, it has borrowed a tiny amount of orbital energy from the planet itself. That’s how missions like Voyager reached the outer planets, and how probes continue to explore regions far beyond what their onboard fuel alone would allow. But there’s an important distinction. An interplanetary gravity assist is typically used to change speed and direction, often increasing the spacecraft’s energy. A free-return trajectory, like the one used in Artemis II, is designed for something more specific: a path that naturally loops back to Earth without requiring additional propulsion. It’s less about gaining energy, and more about shaping a trajectory that guarantees a return. To understand why this works, it helps to stop thinking in straight lines. In space, motion follows curves defined by gravity. The spacecraft is constantly falling, first toward Earth, then toward the Moon, and then back toward Earth again. What looks like a loop is really a continuous free fall through a changing gravitational landscape. This way of navigating space reveals something deeper. We tend to think of engines as the drivers of motion, but once a spacecraft is on its way, gravity does most of the work. The art of spaceflight is not just about thrust. It’s about knowing when not to use it. #GoodLuck #Artemis NASA Artemis

Erika 

234,886 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

A guy who spent 35 years defending the Republican Party says he's leaving. Okay. The real question is: Are millions of Republicans suddenly changing their beliefs because one TV personality is upset, or are they going to keep supporting the policies they voted for? Political parties don't rise or fall based on one person walking away. They rise or fall based on whether they deliver results. He sure thinks a lot of himself, doesn't he? Smh
0:10

A guy who spent 35 years defending the Republican Party says he's leaving. Okay. The real question is: Are millions of Republicans suddenly changing their beliefs because one TV personality is upset, or are they going to keep supporting the policies they voted for? Political parties don't rise or fall based on one person walking away. They rise or fall based on whether they deliver results. He sure thinks a lot of himself, doesn't he? Smh

🎹 Ames™ 🎹

11,678 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Garden River First Nation is here at the Legislature this morning. Their leadership is taking legal action to enforce what their nation was promised under treaty in 1850. More than half of their territory was taken less than 10 years later. #onpoli
0:10

Garden River First Nation is here at the Legislature this morning. Their leadership is taking legal action to enforce what their nation was promised under treaty in 1850. More than half of their territory was taken less than 10 years later. #onpoli

Marit Stiles

23,653 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Oh Damn! The Former FBI director says Kash Patel is seen dancing in nightclubs more than he’s seen working on the job. This bunch is a joke and we the taxpayers are paying their salary to do nothing or screw everything up! 😡😡😡😡
0:18

Oh Damn! The Former FBI director says Kash Patel is seen dancing in nightclubs more than he’s seen working on the job. This bunch is a joke and we the taxpayers are paying their salary to do nothing or screw everything up! 😡😡😡😡

Suzie rizzio

29,401 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr