正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
What powers blockchain tech? PWR Chain focuses on the core 👇 -Blocks -Transactions -Consensus -Security While allowing unlimited innovation on top. Edy explains how PWR differs from app-specific chains by providing blockchain infrastructure supporting: ✅Any VM ✅Any smart contracts ✅Even direct software applications
9 条评论
Amorfati1 年前
@hdd_edy amazing project, get AirDrop
0xf0rd1 年前
@hdd_edy interesting breakdown💪
CharlieLee💪🏼1 年前
@hdd_edy Pwrful 💪🏼
Tom Crofts🥸1 年前
@hdd_edy This is amazing. I'm loving this infrastructure more the more I learn about it.
Smile & CHILL💪1 年前
@hdd_edy
Joy.ETH1 年前
@hdd_edy moar pwr
Dan_iel💪1 年前
@hdd_edy PWRfull
V289x (꧁IP꧂)1 年前
@hdd_edy Wonderful💪🚀
🛸 fallsnine CLONE ꧁IP꧂ | Gnoma | 🦙🔥bao bao 🐼1 年前
@hdd_edy PWRfull
相关视频
5:50
Sensitive content
Could $ICP & $DAG Power the Future of X? DFINITY Foundation was proposed as a decentralized infrastructure solution for X, offering dedicated subnets, enhanced security and on-chain X token integration Combined with Starlink’s satellite internet, this setup aimed to create a scalable, censorship-resistant, and globally accessible platform. Internet Computer is now a cloud service provider (CSP) for National DigiFoundry (NDF) NDF’s Space Working Group (SWG)—built on Constellation Network Hypergraph (HGTP)—is already proving how blockchain can power secure, AI-driven applications for NASA, the Space Force, and the commercial space industry In the audio clip, Kevin Jackson from the National DigiFoundry describes how they will be securing data for the Space Development Agency for all low-Earth orbit satellites If NDF is already deploying decentralized cloud infrastructure, why shouldn’t X leverage the same battle-tested frameworks for: ✅ On-Chain X Tokens → Feeless payments, tips & rewards ✅ Censorship-Resistant Hosting → Subnets & HGTP for tamper-proof data storage ✅ AI Model Integrity → Secure moderation & algorithmic transparency ✅ Starlink-Powered Transactions → Seamless payments & data access without banking roadblocks X has a choice: follow legacy models or lead the Web3 revolution
Dagnum P.I.
32,431 次观看 • 1 年前
![💥DTCC & Ripple 💥 🌹 Current Ripple Advisor, Former CEO of DTCC, Outlined DTCC’s Essential Demands — Which Mirror the XRP Consensus Mechanism 🌹🌷🌺 Rare DTCC Video and documents below 👇 🌹 Donahue on Central Management (2016) > “It is imperative to have transactions flow through something that can be subjected to central management.” — Donald Donahue, former CEO of DTCC, DTCC Blockchain Symposium, Future of Blockchain 🌷 Schwartz on Ripple Consensus (2018) > “Through the consensus process, validators agree on a specific subset of the candidate transactions … servers communicate and update proposals until a supermajority of chosen validators agree on the same set of candidate transactions.” — David Schwartz, Ripple CTO, Consensus vs. Proof-of-Work 🌺 Analysis Donahue’s statement and Schwartz’s explanation can be read as complementary articulations of the same requirement: that financial settlement infrastructures must be distributed but not uncontrolled. Donahue outlined the institutional demand for governance and oversight, while Schwartz described how Ripple’s consensus delivers this through validator coordination and supermajority agreement. Ripple’s architecture therefore operationalises precisely the type of “central management” Donahue considered indispensable. 🌻 Donahue on Automated Infrastructure (2016) > “A processing infrastructure that operates completely on automatic without a central managing hand would drive the financial system straight off a cliff.” — Donald Donahue, former CEO of DTCC, DTCC Blockchain Symposium 🌼 Nakamoto on Bitcoin’s Trustless System (2008) > “We have proposed a system for electronic transactions without relying on trust.” (p. 8) “The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work.” (p. 2) “Proof-of-work is essentially one-CPU-one-vote.” (p. 3) 🌸 Analysis Placed side by side, these quotations highlight the stark divergence between institutional and decentralised philosophies of settlement. Nakamoto championed a system deliberately devoid of managerial oversight, where proof-of-work and distributed consensus replaced institutional governance. Donahue, however, characterised such automation as a potential catastrophe for systemic stability. His warning thus functions as an institutional counterweight to Nakamoto’s thesis, underscoring the incompatibility between the governance needs of global clearinghouses like the DTCC and the ungoverned automation of Bitcoin. 🌹References (Harvard style) Donahue, D. (2016). DTCC Blockchain Symposium, Future of Blockchain, ft. Donald Donahue. [Video]. YouTube. Available at: [Accessed 14 Oct. 2025]. Schwartz, D. (2018). Ripple and XRP – Part 7: Consensus vs. Proof-of-Work. [Video]. YouTube. Available at: [Accessed 14 Oct. 2025]. Ripple Labs (n.d.). Consensus Structure. XRPL Documentation. Available at: [Accessed 14 Oct. 2025]. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Available at: [Accessed 14 Oct. 2025]. DTCC (2024). Annual Report 2024. Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation. Available at: [Accessed 14 Oct. 2025]. #xrp #xrpl #ripple](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1978070016303009875/ext_tw_video_thumb/1978069734965772288/pu/img/xIWZJZKha8sLBPZU.jpg)