Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
what really gets me about this scene is that she doesn’t even have the confidence to tell donna that her and carmy are undeniably close while she’s saying all of these wonderful and special things about him to his semi-estranged mother…
50,069 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 0
Нет доступных комментариев
Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста
![“I can’t speak on whether he was close to converting…I do think from what I’ve been told that he was planning on signing up and starting that process [of becoming Catholic]. But I did not personally have that conversation with him…” A few things: Candace says she can’t speak on whether Charlie was close to converting to Catholicism—and then immediately goes on to speak about how she thinks he was close to converting. 🙄 Additionally, the first time she ever spoke about this (September 15th, see the 2nd clip below) she suggested he was close to converting. Because it’s Candace, she didn’t come right out and say, but she said he “was on the verge of changing some of his beliefs” and then went on to speak about how he was praying the rosary and attending mass. She also referenced him “taking that last step.” All of those things paired together imply (again without outright saying) he was close to converting. She also said in the same episode he was “too smart to be Protestant.” Mind you, this was FIVE DAYS after Charlie had been murdered. Charlie’s parents are Protestant. His wife was raised Catholic but is now Protestant. And whether you think he was close to converting or not, Charlie died Protestant. Her saying that FIVE DAYS after his murder was callous and tone deaf. This is how Candace makes things always and all about herself. This was in fact the first thing that clued me in that something was seriously wrong, after previously being her fan. Today, she doubled down on her implications that Charlie was close to converting (even though again she’d just said she couldn’t speak on that). She said she and Charlie were having conversations about it, but the only evidence she’s ever presented is a single vague text allegedly from him and dated February 2024. The problem is that Charlie went on to reiterate he was evangelical and all of his issues with the Catholic faith this year, in the months leading up to his death. Indeed, one of the final things he said on this earth the day he died was that he was evangelical. So even if he sent that text to Candace in February of 2024, it’s clear he wasn’t that convicted and that she read more into it than was actually meant. Because again, this year, in 2025, he was reaffirming his evangelical faith. Lastly, Candace admitted today that she heard from someone else that Charlie was becoming Catholic (likely Bishop Joseph Brennan). But if she and Charlie were already having conversations about the possibility of him converting (as she claims they were), why wouldn’t he tell Candace directly? Especially when again they allegedly were already having conversations about it? Please listen to what this woman actually says from one month, one week, one day to the next. And parse it out. Hear what she’s saying and also what she’s not saying. Determine what she’s implying. Compare herself to herself. And see if she makes sense to you, if she provides clarity to you, if she provides evidence. Not just on the subject of Charlie converting but on all subjects pertaining to this “investigation.” Finally, this has NOTHING to do with who murdered Charlie and why. I’m tired of talking about it, but she keeps being dishonest about what she actually said, again a mere five days after his murder.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2001150151281533280/amplify_video_thumb/2001150009929240576/img/lU0lOWcCx3ZiVxYJ.jpg)
