正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

What the hell is wrong with Carlos Mendoza?!? A “safety squeeze”? How embarrassing! Sure, the Mets got a run out of it, but doesn’t he know there’s no room for “old school” baseball in today’s advanced analytics world - which tells you never to do that?

MetsFanClub

1,831 subscribers

32,352 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Carlos Mendoza said the Mets had a "number of pitches in mind" for Christian Scott today vs. the Rockies, which is why he wasn't given a chance to finish off the 5th

Carlos Mendoza said the Mets had a "number of pitches in mind" for Christian Scott today vs. the Rockies, which is why he wasn't given a chance to finish off the 5th

SNY

23,829 次观看 • 2 个月前

Carlos Mendoza was asked if he thinks the Mets are in too deep of a hole to climb out of "I don't think so, but we've got to start playing better - that's the bottom line"

Carlos Mendoza was asked if he thinks the Mets are in too deep of a hole to climb out of "I don't think so, but we've got to start playing better - that's the bottom line"

SNY

26,495 次观看 • 2 个月前

This Dividion 3 baseball player was given a tounge lashing by his coach for not hustling out of the batter’s box and admiring his homerun. The coach yells at him to hustle because he doesn’t know if it’s going to be a home run and he needs to hustle. He tells him if he ever does that again, it will be his last at bat there. Some are saying the coach is being ridiculous, let the player have fun. Others are saying the coach was right on the money and that’s what is wrong with players today- too much showboating. What do you think? Do you think the coach overacted or do you think he was correct?

This Dividion 3 baseball player was given a tounge lashing by his coach for not hustling out of the batter’s box and admiring his homerun. The coach yells at him to hustle because he doesn’t know if it’s going to be a home run and he needs to hustle. He tells him if he ever does that again, it will be his last at bat there. Some are saying the coach is being ridiculous, let the player have fun. Others are saying the coach was right on the money and that’s what is wrong with players today- too much showboating. What do you think? Do you think the coach overacted or do you think he was correct?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

357,209 次观看 • 3 个月前

"The last thing you want is panic. You've got too many good hitters there that are going through it right now." Carlos Mendoza talks about what the Mets can do as they deal with their offensive funk:

"The last thing you want is panic. You've got too many good hitters there that are going through it right now." Carlos Mendoza talks about what the Mets can do as they deal with their offensive funk:

SNY

70,970 次观看 • 3 个月前

Left shoulder. Do you know how painful that back swing would be with a significant shoulder issue? Do you see him wincing in pain? Can the shoulder be bugging him? Sure. Is it so bad that it’s an excuse for his 3rd year of bad offense? Hell no. He isn’t getting let off the hook

Left shoulder. Do you know how painful that back swing would be with a significant shoulder issue? Do you see him wincing in pain? Can the shoulder be bugging him? Sure. Is it so bad that it’s an excuse for his 3rd year of bad offense? Hell no. He isn’t getting let off the hook

JL

189,940 次观看 • 10 个月前

Unfortunately he won't take the room for 5 days because as he puts it, it's not permanent and he believes he will be back on the streets afterwards as it's happened to him previously he tells me. I've tried my hardest to reassure him that I won't let that happen but he says he's been let down so many times before that he just doesn't believe it and is happy where he is until I can find him a permanent room in a shared house I've spoken with him long and hard over the last week and I've come to the conclusion based on everything he's told me and my research that he's not a British army veteran with a service number he talks of being a mercenary part of the 13 commandos part of the French foreign legion and has the cap badge on his hat. What I do know is he's a 59 year old man with health problems but no drug or alcohol problems that is living in a tent in wasteland. My level of support hasn't changed he shouldn't be in wasteland in a tent rotting away with no family no support in 2025 I'm going to try my hardest this week to secure a room in a shared house the 5 night stay at the guest house is non refundable but it is what it is I just wanted to make sure he woke up on his 60th birthday in a better place. We tried our hardest but it doesn't always work out how you planned it in your head. Thank you all for sharing and raising awareness and thank you to Robert a long time supporter who has purchased a birthday cake for me to give him tomorrow 💙

Unfortunately he won't take the room for 5 days because as he puts it, it's not permanent and he believes he will be back on the streets afterwards as it's happened to him previously he tells me. I've tried my hardest to reassure him that I won't let that happen but he says he's been let down so many times before that he just doesn't believe it and is happy where he is until I can find him a permanent room in a shared house I've spoken with him long and hard over the last week and I've come to the conclusion based on everything he's told me and my research that he's not a British army veteran with a service number he talks of being a mercenary part of the 13 commandos part of the French foreign legion and has the cap badge on his hat. What I do know is he's a 59 year old man with health problems but no drug or alcohol problems that is living in a tent in wasteland. My level of support hasn't changed he shouldn't be in wasteland in a tent rotting away with no family no support in 2025 I'm going to try my hardest this week to secure a room in a shared house the 5 night stay at the guest house is non refundable but it is what it is I just wanted to make sure he woke up on his 60th birthday in a better place. We tried our hardest but it doesn't always work out how you planned it in your head. Thank you all for sharing and raising awareness and thank you to Robert a long time supporter who has purchased a birthday cake for me to give him tomorrow 💙

Active Patriot

280,256 次观看 • 10 个月前

Absolutely shite race that. They have all got it wrong imo. Not sure what Moore is doing so far off it an going down that route with Isaac and Buick much the same gave Poseidon’s too much to do. Wouldn’t know what to make of that race if I’m honest but no good for us with Isaac killing the double 🙄

Absolutely shite race that. They have all got it wrong imo. Not sure what Moore is doing so far off it an going down that route with Isaac and Buick much the same gave Poseidon’s too much to do. Wouldn’t know what to make of that race if I’m honest but no good for us with Isaac killing the double 🙄

Jack 🐴

32,851 次观看 • 3 个月前

A good start to the weekend: Adopted this old lady a year ago. Probably 13 years old. I'm glad I got her out of that shelter. I never know how long I have with them, but it's always worth it. Aunt Bea is my friend.

A good start to the weekend: Adopted this old lady a year ago. Probably 13 years old. I'm glad I got her out of that shelter. I never know how long I have with them, but it's always worth it. Aunt Bea is my friend.

terry schappert

31,274 次观看 • 1 年前

"They didn't see the ball leave the ballpark and there was no fan interference. It was tough to tell from the big screen there and that's what they got in the replay room." Carlos Mendoza shares the explanation he got from the umpires on Juan Soto's overturned home run:

"They didn't see the ball leave the ballpark and there was no fan interference. It was tough to tell from the big screen there and that's what they got in the replay room." Carlos Mendoza shares the explanation he got from the umpires on Juan Soto's overturned home run:

SNY Mets

73,993 次观看 • 1 个月前

This has all been shared ad nauseam, but here’s my two cents. Yes, I think they were probably disappointed with their seats. Not that it wasn’t the front row, as we all know those are terrible seats for a movie, but still, they look hugely out of place. I’m sure they were hoping something a bit more benefiting their perceived sense of self-importance. But it’s Harry that gets me here. In the picture, which granted is just a moment, you can feel the misery and the brokenness. He does not look like a happy man. Sure, he fakes it for the cameras, but not everything is happy behind the scenes. It’s hard to know for sure, of course, but there’s a sadness that can be felt looking at him.

This has all been shared ad nauseam, but here’s my two cents. Yes, I think they were probably disappointed with their seats. Not that it wasn’t the front row, as we all know those are terrible seats for a movie, but still, they look hugely out of place. I’m sure they were hoping something a bit more benefiting their perceived sense of self-importance. But it’s Harry that gets me here. In the picture, which granted is just a moment, you can feel the misery and the brokenness. He does not look like a happy man. Sure, he fakes it for the cameras, but not everything is happy behind the scenes. It’s hard to know for sure, of course, but there’s a sadness that can be felt looking at him.

Royal News Network

1,234,311 次观看 • 2 年前

2024. Nancy Pelosi: I have to run again to make sure what's his name never becomes President...for the children. Sure Nancy, you're doing this at 86 years old for the children. Power is a hell of a drug.

2024. Nancy Pelosi: I have to run again to make sure what's his name never becomes President...for the children. Sure Nancy, you're doing this at 86 years old for the children. Power is a hell of a drug.

MAZE

400,339 次观看 • 23 天前

It wasn’t meant to be, but everything happens for a reason. I’m proud of how Jannik Sinner played and how he taught respect to the cavemen in the stands. Carlos Alcaraz you made a huge mistake - you created a monster. And for that, I want to thank you. The world isn’t ready..

It wasn’t meant to be, but everything happens for a reason. I’m proud of how Jannik Sinner played and how he taught respect to the cavemen in the stands. Carlos Alcaraz you made a huge mistake - you created a monster. And for that, I want to thank you. The world isn’t ready..

Massimo

60,629 次观看 • 1 年前

What we know for certain….100% factual…..proven by video…..is….the guy who claims to know biomechanics…..doesn’t know a high level swing. Check his work. Its proven By video of his work. He can squeal all he wants…..to try to keep truth from his following. But the video….. simple side by side video. SHOUTS……. HE’S A HITTING MORON He shoots at the wrong target regularly. Directs all his hate at the wrong target. His target should be his own inability. His own ignorance. His own dishonesty. Which there is volumes of. He should try to teach what the best do. But he has no idea what they do. The video proves it.

What we know for certain….100% factual…..proven by video…..is….the guy who claims to know biomechanics…..doesn’t know a high level swing. Check his work. Its proven By video of his work. He can squeal all he wants…..to try to keep truth from his following. But the video….. simple side by side video. SHOUTS……. HE’S A HITTING MORON He shoots at the wrong target regularly. Directs all his hate at the wrong target. His target should be his own inability. His own ignorance. His own dishonesty. Which there is volumes of. He should try to teach what the best do. But he has no idea what they do. The video proves it.

Richard Schenck, The Heretic JFD PPP LQC TTE. 🙂

11,287 次观看 • 2 个月前

Do we need to break down the phrase “ Ran down” because how you run a bitch down but still lose???? Brandy Norwood said it best “ Almost doesn’t Count” ! What I do know is USA has dragged them Jamaican Gyals 4x in a row! 😏

Do we need to break down the phrase “ Ran down” because how you run a bitch down but still lose???? Brandy Norwood said it best “ Almost doesn’t Count” ! What I do know is USA has dragged them Jamaican Gyals 4x in a row! 😏

Sha’Carri Hive 🐝

75,985 次观看 • 10 个月前

Okay so I have come to the conclusion that you can enjoy the Savannah Bananas but it’s important to not think of it as baseball. It’s just a show to be enjoyed. Kind of like how stripping isn’t about dancing. It’s baseball adjacent enjoy it for what it is, just keep it out of real baseball.

Okay so I have come to the conclusion that you can enjoy the Savannah Bananas but it’s important to not think of it as baseball. It’s just a show to be enjoyed. Kind of like how stripping isn’t about dancing. It’s baseball adjacent enjoy it for what it is, just keep it out of real baseball.

Seth McClung

19,321 次观看 • 3 个月前

(2/7) Then, he mentions that odd 'handshake' with Erdogan, when his finger got... stuck? for way too long in the Turkish president's hand. Again, he was making sure to frame the event as something that got out of control for no apparent reason. Notice that, once again, he makes sure to mention that the video was 'authentic'. You know where this is going...

(2/7) Then, he mentions that odd 'handshake' with Erdogan, when his finger got... stuck? for way too long in the Turkish president's hand. Again, he was making sure to frame the event as something that got out of control for no apparent reason. Notice that, once again, he makes sure to mention that the video was 'authentic'. You know where this is going...

Jesús Enrique Rosas - The Body Language Guy

119,790 次观看 • 1 年前

awh paige 🐺💙 “I’m going to feel the Storrs vibes from all the way in Philly. You know what Storrs is? The basketball capital of the world.” You can take a husky out of Storrs but never Storrs out of a husky.

awh paige 🐺💙 “I’m going to feel the Storrs vibes from all the way in Philly. You know what Storrs is? The basketball capital of the world.” You can take a husky out of Storrs but never Storrs out of a husky.

j

39,164 次观看 • 5 个月前

Dawah is deception. Why are you leaving out the context SeerahPro ? You know right after this he says he doesn’t remember well what he wrote in that entry on Muhaymin. Why leave that part out? He even goes on to say that section seems to be non-committal and he needs to go back and re-read it. So since you don’t want to show every one the full context, I’ll do it, and expose how you are lying now and lied in the debate. Sinai doesn’t help your claim that the Quran believes the previous scriptures were textually corrupted. He says he doesn’t think the Quran believes the previous scriptures were corrupted in the deep past and that they are unrecoverable (Clip 1). Now let’s look at the short clip you pulled in context (Clip 2). First, what he says does not affirm why you cited him to begin with, which is that the Quran is supposed to be a supreme authority and determine which parts of our scriptures are corrupt and which are not. In the very clip you pulled he says, “The Quran is claiming to be able to sort of determine the correct reading of these previous scriptures and to remedy misreading and misunderstandings.” So by arbiter he means it is not determining what parts of our scriptures are true or corrupted, it is only an arbiter in determining meaning. You just buried yourself by citing this, because you implied Sinai was saying the Quran is an arbiter for determining textual corruption, which he doesn’t say. It’s like you didn’t even pay attention to what you pulled. That is embarrassing. Second, right after this (in what you left out) the interviewer reminds him he entertained two possibilities in his book and was noncommittal. Sinai says he doesn’t remember what he said and was probably leaving open possibilities, which is what I already had to correct you on. If you go back to the book, once again, he said on page 707 essentially what I said, “Muhaymin, meanwhile, is derived from Syriac mhaymnā (or conceivably from its equivalent in some other form of Aramaic), a passive participle of the verb haymen and meaning ‘trustworthy, faithful, loyal.’” After this all he does in the book is mention other possibilities and the one you want is more contingent on non-canonical readings. But even if that interpretation is correct (which Sinai confirms in this interview is his view) it doesn’t help you, because you misunderstood what Sinai means by ‘arbiter.’ In Clip 3 he first says, “So I need to reread that entry. I guess it seems to be very non-committal.” But remember you said (Clip 4), “In his 'Key Terms of the Quran' he explicitly says that Muhaymin means the Quran is the arbiter of the contents.” That is incorrect. He did not explicitly say that. Why did you lie? In Clip 3 he goes on to say “But I think entrusted with authority can mean, authorized to sort of authoritatively interpret and determine especially theological significance.” So you don’t even understand what Sinai means by “arbiter.” He doesn’t mean what you mean, that the Quran is determining which parts of our scriptures are true and corrupted, but that it is an arbiter of meaning. The fact that you still do not see this means you are beyond delusional. You never should have cited Sinai because he doesn’t help you at all. The funny thing is we were already planning to go live tomorrow to review this interview because he doesn’t help you at all and unintentionally helps with the Islamic Dilemma.

Dawah is deception. Why are you leaving out the context SeerahPro ? You know right after this he says he doesn’t remember well what he wrote in that entry on Muhaymin. Why leave that part out? He even goes on to say that section seems to be non-committal and he needs to go back and re-read it. So since you don’t want to show every one the full context, I’ll do it, and expose how you are lying now and lied in the debate. Sinai doesn’t help your claim that the Quran believes the previous scriptures were textually corrupted. He says he doesn’t think the Quran believes the previous scriptures were corrupted in the deep past and that they are unrecoverable (Clip 1). Now let’s look at the short clip you pulled in context (Clip 2). First, what he says does not affirm why you cited him to begin with, which is that the Quran is supposed to be a supreme authority and determine which parts of our scriptures are corrupt and which are not. In the very clip you pulled he says, “The Quran is claiming to be able to sort of determine the correct reading of these previous scriptures and to remedy misreading and misunderstandings.” So by arbiter he means it is not determining what parts of our scriptures are true or corrupted, it is only an arbiter in determining meaning. You just buried yourself by citing this, because you implied Sinai was saying the Quran is an arbiter for determining textual corruption, which he doesn’t say. It’s like you didn’t even pay attention to what you pulled. That is embarrassing. Second, right after this (in what you left out) the interviewer reminds him he entertained two possibilities in his book and was noncommittal. Sinai says he doesn’t remember what he said and was probably leaving open possibilities, which is what I already had to correct you on. If you go back to the book, once again, he said on page 707 essentially what I said, “Muhaymin, meanwhile, is derived from Syriac mhaymnā (or conceivably from its equivalent in some other form of Aramaic), a passive participle of the verb haymen and meaning ‘trustworthy, faithful, loyal.’” After this all he does in the book is mention other possibilities and the one you want is more contingent on non-canonical readings. But even if that interpretation is correct (which Sinai confirms in this interview is his view) it doesn’t help you, because you misunderstood what Sinai means by ‘arbiter.’ In Clip 3 he first says, “So I need to reread that entry. I guess it seems to be very non-committal.” But remember you said (Clip 4), “In his 'Key Terms of the Quran' he explicitly says that Muhaymin means the Quran is the arbiter of the contents.” That is incorrect. He did not explicitly say that. Why did you lie? In Clip 3 he goes on to say “But I think entrusted with authority can mean, authorized to sort of authoritatively interpret and determine especially theological significance.” So you don’t even understand what Sinai means by “arbiter.” He doesn’t mean what you mean, that the Quran is determining which parts of our scriptures are true and corrupted, but that it is an arbiter of meaning. The fact that you still do not see this means you are beyond delusional. You never should have cited Sinai because he doesn’t help you at all. The funny thing is we were already planning to go live tomorrow to review this interview because he doesn’t help you at all and unintentionally helps with the Islamic Dilemma.

InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones

36,857 次观看 • 18 天前

Is the World Baseball Classic the next World Cup? I discussed with guest CJ from MLB Network Radio on SiriusXM. What we can say for sure is that for the countries that participate, it means a whole lot. LINK 🔗

Is the World Baseball Classic the next World Cup? I discussed with guest CJ from MLB Network Radio on SiriusXM. What we can say for sure is that for the countries that participate, it means a whole lot. LINK 🔗

Hope Solo

111,069 次观看 • 3 年前

Trump: "Millions of American small businesses, including corner stores. What is a corner store? I've never heard that term. I know what a corner store is but I've never heard it described-- a corner store. Who the hell wrote that?"

Trump: "Millions of American small businesses, including corner stores. What is a corner store? I've never heard that term. I know what a corner store is but I've never heard it described-- a corner store. Who the hell wrote that?"

Aaron Rupar

2,144,248 次观看 • 3 个月前