正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

"WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF THE LARGEST NUCLEAR BOMB STRUCK NEW YORK" The largest nuclear weapon ever detonated was the Soviet Union's Tsar Bomba in 1961, with a yield of 50 megatons of TNT. No larger weapon has been built or tested, and modern arsenals focus on smaller, more precise...

World_At_War_6's profile picture

Global Strategy

112,555 subscribers

308,624 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

What If a ☢️Nuclear Bomb Hits New York City? The devastating impact of a nuclear explosion in New York City would be catastrophic, affecting millions of lives and reshaping the world as we know it. Using a hypothetical scenario, experts have simulated the destruction caused by a nuclear bomb targeting a major urban area like NYC. Can this scenario be avoided? Experts stress the importance of nuclear disarmament and peaceful resolutions to global conflicts. #NuclearWar #NYC #NuclearExplosion #WhatIf #GlobalPeace #NuclearWeapons #DisasterPreparedness #WorldSafety
2:13

What If a ☢️Nuclear Bomb Hits New York City? The devastating impact of a nuclear explosion in New York City would be catastrophic, affecting millions of lives and reshaping the world as we know it. Using a hypothetical scenario, experts have simulated the destruction caused by a nuclear bomb targeting a major urban area like NYC. Can this scenario be avoided? Experts stress the importance of nuclear disarmament and peaceful resolutions to global conflicts. #NuclearWar #NYC #NuclearExplosion #WhatIf #GlobalPeace #NuclearWeapons #DisasterPreparedness #WorldSafety

World War 3

52,369 次观看 • 1 年前

As the War Mongers in Europe prepare for an imaginary War of distraction against Russia- A Warning from History. This archive film shows the testing of the most powerful bomb ever built, and detonated, in human history. Known as the “Tsar Bomba,” it was tested on the 30th Oct, 1961, at the Sukhoi Nose nuclear test site on the island of Novaya Zemlya Russia The power of the explosion exceeded 58 megatons, and the height of the explosion exceeded 67 km. The flash was visible at a distance of more than 1000 km; in the village of Dikson, 780 km from the epicenter of the explosion, glass in the windows of houses was broken, and the blast wave circled the globe three times. Today, Russia possesses the largest and most advanced Nuclear arsenal on planet Earth, It also possesses the most advanced delivery systems in existence. The idea that Western politicians would consider, even the remote possibility of pushing for escalation against Russia that could, however unlikely end in the use of these weapons, is absolutely terrifying.
1:04

As the War Mongers in Europe prepare for an imaginary War of distraction against Russia- A Warning from History. This archive film shows the testing of the most powerful bomb ever built, and detonated, in human history. Known as the “Tsar Bomba,” it was tested on the 30th Oct, 1961, at the Sukhoi Nose nuclear test site on the island of Novaya Zemlya Russia The power of the explosion exceeded 58 megatons, and the height of the explosion exceeded 67 km. The flash was visible at a distance of more than 1000 km; in the village of Dikson, 780 km from the epicenter of the explosion, glass in the windows of houses was broken, and the blast wave circled the globe three times. Today, Russia possesses the largest and most advanced Nuclear arsenal on planet Earth, It also possesses the most advanced delivery systems in existence. The idea that Western politicians would consider, even the remote possibility of pushing for escalation against Russia that could, however unlikely end in the use of these weapons, is absolutely terrifying.

Chay Bowes

31,696 次观看 • 8 个月前

This archive film shows the testing of the most powerful bomb ever built, and detonated, in human history. Known as the “Tsar Bomba,” it was tested on the 30th Oct, 1961, at the Sukhoi Nose nuclear test site on the island of Novaya Zemlya Russia The power of the explosion exceeded 58 megatons, and the height of the explosion exceeded 67 km. The flash was visible at a distance of more than 1000 km; in the village of Dikson, 780 km from the epicenter of the explosion, glass in the windows of houses was broken, and the blast wave circled the globe three times. Today, Russia possesses the largest and most advanced Nuclear arsenal on planet Earth, It also possesses the most advanced delivery systems in existence. The idea that Western politicians would consider, even the remote possibility of pushing for escalation against Russia that could, however unlikely end in the use of these weapons, is absolutely terrifying.
1:04

This archive film shows the testing of the most powerful bomb ever built, and detonated, in human history. Known as the “Tsar Bomba,” it was tested on the 30th Oct, 1961, at the Sukhoi Nose nuclear test site on the island of Novaya Zemlya Russia The power of the explosion exceeded 58 megatons, and the height of the explosion exceeded 67 km. The flash was visible at a distance of more than 1000 km; in the village of Dikson, 780 km from the epicenter of the explosion, glass in the windows of houses was broken, and the blast wave circled the globe three times. Today, Russia possesses the largest and most advanced Nuclear arsenal on planet Earth, It also possesses the most advanced delivery systems in existence. The idea that Western politicians would consider, even the remote possibility of pushing for escalation against Russia that could, however unlikely end in the use of these weapons, is absolutely terrifying.

Chay Bowes

926,789 次观看 • 2 年前

☢️☢️☢️ Nuclear war In the event of a nuclear conflict between Russia and NATO, it is estimated that 98-99% of the population in the US, EU, Russia, and China would perish. This thought-provoking video sheds light on the utter futility of engaging in a nuclear conflict that would devastate the entire northern hemisphere. The goal is to instill a deep sense of fear regarding the consequences of a nuclear war and cultivate a strong desire for negotiation. It's evident that any alternative to the death of 99% of the northern hemisphere's population would be preferable.
3:31

☢️☢️☢️ Nuclear war In the event of a nuclear conflict between Russia and NATO, it is estimated that 98-99% of the population in the US, EU, Russia, and China would perish. This thought-provoking video sheds light on the utter futility of engaging in a nuclear conflict that would devastate the entire northern hemisphere. The goal is to instill a deep sense of fear regarding the consequences of a nuclear war and cultivate a strong desire for negotiation. It's evident that any alternative to the death of 99% of the northern hemisphere's population would be preferable.

Russian Market

331,271 次观看 • 3 年前

"THE WORLD'S MOST POWERFUL NUCLEAR BOMB" Regarded as the most powerful nuclear weapon ever created and tested, the Tsar Bomba was detonated by the Soviet Union on October 30, 1961. It generated a yield of about 50 megatons of TNT, equating to nearly 3,300 times the strength of the "Little Boy" bomb that was released over Hiroshima. The test took place over the Mityushikha Bay site on the remote island of Novaya Zemlya in the Russian Arctic. A specially modified Tu-95V bomber dropped the 27-ton bomb from an altitude of 34,000 feet. A massive parachute was used to slow its descent, giving the crew a 50% chance of escape. 👀
1:13

"THE WORLD'S MOST POWERFUL NUCLEAR BOMB" Regarded as the most powerful nuclear weapon ever created and tested, the Tsar Bomba was detonated by the Soviet Union on October 30, 1961. It generated a yield of about 50 megatons of TNT, equating to nearly 3,300 times the strength of the "Little Boy" bomb that was released over Hiroshima. The test took place over the Mityushikha Bay site on the remote island of Novaya Zemlya in the Russian Arctic. A specially modified Tu-95V bomber dropped the 27-ton bomb from an altitude of 34,000 feet. A massive parachute was used to slow its descent, giving the crew a 50% chance of escape. 👀

Global Strategy

20,875 次观看 • 7 个月前

BOMBSHELL.🚨 The New York Times buries in a report that the Biden administration is considering the return of Nuclear Weapons to Ukraine. "So U.S. and European officials are discussing deterrence as a possible security guarantee for Ukraine, such as stockpiling a conventional arsenal sufficient to strike a punishing blow if Russia violates a cease-fire. Several officials even suggested that Mr. Biden could return nuclear weapons to Ukraine that were taken from it after the fall of the Soviet Union. That would be an instant and enormous deterrent. But such a step would be complicated and have serious implications." The nuclear brinksmanship is being framed as an act of "deterrence," but it would drastically escalate the conflict. Moscow is sure to consider such an action as a betrayal of Post-Soviet agreements and a direct provocation. Russian president Vladimir Putin recently lowered the threshold for using nuclear weapons; a major attack on Russia with conventional missiles, drones or aircraft could trigger a nuclear response. The Biden administration can't leave office soon enough.
0:29

BOMBSHELL.🚨 The New York Times buries in a report that the Biden administration is considering the return of Nuclear Weapons to Ukraine. "So U.S. and European officials are discussing deterrence as a possible security guarantee for Ukraine, such as stockpiling a conventional arsenal sufficient to strike a punishing blow if Russia violates a cease-fire. Several officials even suggested that Mr. Biden could return nuclear weapons to Ukraine that were taken from it after the fall of the Soviet Union. That would be an instant and enormous deterrent. But such a step would be complicated and have serious implications." The nuclear brinksmanship is being framed as an act of "deterrence," but it would drastically escalate the conflict. Moscow is sure to consider such an action as a betrayal of Post-Soviet agreements and a direct provocation. Russian president Vladimir Putin recently lowered the threshold for using nuclear weapons; a major attack on Russia with conventional missiles, drones or aircraft could trigger a nuclear response. The Biden administration can't leave office soon enough.

Kyle Becker

385,090 次观看 • 1 年前

Thank you Lara Trump for your kind words on Sid Rosenberg’s radio show this morning! “I would say that Elise Stefanik would be the best choice for New Yorkers. If I were a New Yorker and I could still vote in that state, that is who I would be choosing for Governor of my state… It is one of the great states. Eric and I lived there for so long and were residents of New York City and New York State. Sadly we have left because of the bad policies of people who seem to hate the residents of New York. I would love to see her as Governor, absolutely.”
1:15

Thank you Lara Trump for your kind words on Sid Rosenberg’s radio show this morning! “I would say that Elise Stefanik would be the best choice for New Yorkers. If I were a New Yorker and I could still vote in that state, that is who I would be choosing for Governor of my state… It is one of the great states. Eric and I lived there for so long and were residents of New York City and New York State. Sadly we have left because of the bad policies of people who seem to hate the residents of New York. I would love to see her as Governor, absolutely.”

Elise Stefanik

17,512 次观看 • 11 个月前

Physicist Hans-Benjamin Braun claims the December 15–16, 2024 explosion in Tartus, Syria may have been caused by a very small nuclear device of about 0.3 kilotons. The blast reportedly produced a seismic signal equivalent to about a magnitude 3.0–3.1 earthquake, which he says fits the expected yield of such a weapon. He also points to radiation spikes detected at monitoring stations in Cyprus and parts of Turkey about 16 hours later, which he interprets as fallout carried by the wind, along with reported radiation levels near the explosion site that he says match a low-yield nuclear detonation. He also says that this was not the only low-yield nuclear weapon used in the recent conflicts. If this is true, it would mean we are already in a limited nuclear strikes scenario, with the next stage being World War III and full nuclear war before the geophysical event. This is the alleged nuclear explosion. Keep in mind that if this was a 0.3 kiloton bomb, it would be about 50 times weaker than the Hiroshima bomb.
0:22

Physicist Hans-Benjamin Braun claims the December 15–16, 2024 explosion in Tartus, Syria may have been caused by a very small nuclear device of about 0.3 kilotons. The blast reportedly produced a seismic signal equivalent to about a magnitude 3.0–3.1 earthquake, which he says fits the expected yield of such a weapon. He also points to radiation spikes detected at monitoring stations in Cyprus and parts of Turkey about 16 hours later, which he interprets as fallout carried by the wind, along with reported radiation levels near the explosion site that he says match a low-yield nuclear detonation. He also says that this was not the only low-yield nuclear weapon used in the recent conflicts. If this is true, it would mean we are already in a limited nuclear strikes scenario, with the next stage being World War III and full nuclear war before the geophysical event. This is the alleged nuclear explosion. Keep in mind that if this was a 0.3 kiloton bomb, it would be about 50 times weaker than the Hiroshima bomb.

Open Minded Approach

725,887 次观看 • 5 个月前

It’s a measure of their insanity that leaders around the world are seriously considering nuclear war. Ivana Hughes of Columbia on what that would mean. (0:00) How Powerful Are Nuclear Weapons? (9:46) What Would Happen if a Nuke Detonated Over Times Square? (19:53) What Is Nuclear Winter? (24:56) Ozone Layer Destruction (27:06) What Would Happen if a Nuclear Power Plant Was Hit With a Nuclear Weapon? (29:08) How Many Times Have We Launched Nuclear Weapons? (33:57) The Horrifying Effects of Radiation (41:29) Is Nuclear Testing Infecting Our Food and Causing Cancer? (49:41) How Many Nuclear Weapons Exist Today? (51:14) Close Calls With Nuclear War and Lost Nukes (54:47) The Cuban Missile Crisis and JFK’s Attempt to Ban Nuclear Weapons (1:02:03) Why JFK Wanted to End Israel’s Nuclear Program (1:06:16) North Korea’s Nuclear Program (1:08:20) Is Iran Actually Trying to Build a Nuclear Weapon? (1:11:48) The Moral Debate About Our Nuclear Defense Policy (1:19:59) Are World Leaders Calling for Nuclear War? (1:29:50) Should America Lead the Charge in Eliminating Nuclear Weapons? (1:36:50) What Is the Doomsday Clock? (1:41:26) How Much Money Is Spent on Nuclear Weapon Development? (1:43:29) The First Step to Eliminating Nuclear Weapons Includes paid partnerships.
1:49:57

It’s a measure of their insanity that leaders around the world are seriously considering nuclear war. Ivana Hughes of Columbia on what that would mean. (0:00) How Powerful Are Nuclear Weapons? (9:46) What Would Happen if a Nuke Detonated Over Times Square? (19:53) What Is Nuclear Winter? (24:56) Ozone Layer Destruction (27:06) What Would Happen if a Nuclear Power Plant Was Hit With a Nuclear Weapon? (29:08) How Many Times Have We Launched Nuclear Weapons? (33:57) The Horrifying Effects of Radiation (41:29) Is Nuclear Testing Infecting Our Food and Causing Cancer? (49:41) How Many Nuclear Weapons Exist Today? (51:14) Close Calls With Nuclear War and Lost Nukes (54:47) The Cuban Missile Crisis and JFK’s Attempt to Ban Nuclear Weapons (1:02:03) Why JFK Wanted to End Israel’s Nuclear Program (1:06:16) North Korea’s Nuclear Program (1:08:20) Is Iran Actually Trying to Build a Nuclear Weapon? (1:11:48) The Moral Debate About Our Nuclear Defense Policy (1:19:59) Are World Leaders Calling for Nuclear War? (1:29:50) Should America Lead the Charge in Eliminating Nuclear Weapons? (1:36:50) What Is the Doomsday Clock? (1:41:26) How Much Money Is Spent on Nuclear Weapon Development? (1:43:29) The First Step to Eliminating Nuclear Weapons Includes paid partnerships.

Tucker Carlson

1,027,157 次观看 • 10 个月前

New John Mearsheimer lecture on tactical nuclear weapons just dropped -- fascinating stuff. transcript from Grok Bot: "So it's just very important to understand that tactical nuclear weapons were seen for much of the 1950s as a magic weapon. Now, what happened to throw cold water on this whole line of thinking was a war game that was run in mid-June 1955. This is called Carte Blanche, and we had the situation where the Soviets would attack with conventional forces. We would use nuclear weapons, tactical nuclear weapons in response. And of course, the Soviets would use nuclear weapons of their own. Now, what happened in this war game, basically about 3,000 NATO aircraft from 11 different countries were employed in the war game. And about, I'd say, 335 nuclear weapons were employed. The usual range is 335 to 355. That's how many tactical nuclear weapons were employed in this war game. And by the way, the Russians, of course, employed nuclear weapons as well as the NATO forces in this war game. And in fact, the Russians or the Soviets ended up using or deploying or exploding more nuclear weapons, slightly more nuclear weapons than NATO did. But let's say the total was about 335 nuclear weapons. And the war was fought almost exclusively on West German soil. Now, what was the end result? The end result is that 1.7 million West Germans died and 3.5 million West Germans were wounded. Moreover, these numbers don't take into account the subsequent deaths that would occur as a result of the radiation poisoning. So you just want to think about that. You had a war game that went from June 20th to June 28th. This is 1955, the middle of the 50s, and it ended up with 1.7 million West Germans dead. What is this tell you? In effect, it tells you that you're destroying Germany to save Germany."
2:58

New John Mearsheimer lecture on tactical nuclear weapons just dropped -- fascinating stuff. transcript from Grok Bot: "So it's just very important to understand that tactical nuclear weapons were seen for much of the 1950s as a magic weapon. Now, what happened to throw cold water on this whole line of thinking was a war game that was run in mid-June 1955. This is called Carte Blanche, and we had the situation where the Soviets would attack with conventional forces. We would use nuclear weapons, tactical nuclear weapons in response. And of course, the Soviets would use nuclear weapons of their own. Now, what happened in this war game, basically about 3,000 NATO aircraft from 11 different countries were employed in the war game. And about, I'd say, 335 nuclear weapons were employed. The usual range is 335 to 355. That's how many tactical nuclear weapons were employed in this war game. And by the way, the Russians, of course, employed nuclear weapons as well as the NATO forces in this war game. And in fact, the Russians or the Soviets ended up using or deploying or exploding more nuclear weapons, slightly more nuclear weapons than NATO did. But let's say the total was about 335 nuclear weapons. And the war was fought almost exclusively on West German soil. Now, what was the end result? The end result is that 1.7 million West Germans died and 3.5 million West Germans were wounded. Moreover, these numbers don't take into account the subsequent deaths that would occur as a result of the radiation poisoning. So you just want to think about that. You had a war game that went from June 20th to June 28th. This is 1955, the middle of the 50s, and it ended up with 1.7 million West Germans dead. What is this tell you? In effect, it tells you that you're destroying Germany to save Germany."

@jason

50,070 次观看 • 7 天前

Peter Doocy just dropped the full details of the U.S. proposed 14-point plan to end the war with Iran. DOOCY: “We have got the details of this 14-point plan, according to Axios, under the banner; U.S. and Iran closing in on one-page memo to end the war.” “We've got these...” “A five-year ban on nuclear enrichment, which would be less than the 20 year ban President Trump previously said he didn't like.” “There would be limits of 4% enrichment after that.” “There would be a ban on underground nuclear facilities.” “A vow to never seek a nuclear weapon.” “Commitment to enhanced nuclear inspections.” “And an end to restrictions on travel through the Strait of Hormuz.” “President Trump, though, is telling the New York Post it's too soon right now to schedule a new round of in-person talks with Iran.”
0:47

Peter Doocy just dropped the full details of the U.S. proposed 14-point plan to end the war with Iran. DOOCY: “We have got the details of this 14-point plan, according to Axios, under the banner; U.S. and Iran closing in on one-page memo to end the war.” “We've got these...” “A five-year ban on nuclear enrichment, which would be less than the 20 year ban President Trump previously said he didn't like.” “There would be limits of 4% enrichment after that.” “There would be a ban on underground nuclear facilities.” “A vow to never seek a nuclear weapon.” “Commitment to enhanced nuclear inspections.” “And an end to restrictions on travel through the Strait of Hormuz.” “President Trump, though, is telling the New York Post it's too soon right now to schedule a new round of in-person talks with Iran.”

Overton

40,628 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 NOW: A proposed deal between the US and Iran BANS underground nuclear facilities, requires the regime to commit to NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS, and blocks enrichment for years "There would be limits of 4% enrichment after that." "A commitment to enhanced nuclear inspections, and an end to restrictions on travel through the Strait of Hormuz. President Trump, though, is telling the New York Post it's too soon right now to schedule a new round of in-person talks with Iran."
2:07

🚨 NOW: A proposed deal between the US and Iran BANS underground nuclear facilities, requires the regime to commit to NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS, and blocks enrichment for years "There would be limits of 4% enrichment after that." "A commitment to enhanced nuclear inspections, and an end to restrictions on travel through the Strait of Hormuz. President Trump, though, is telling the New York Post it's too soon right now to schedule a new round of in-person talks with Iran."

Eric Daugherty

222,073 次观看 • 3 个月前

On June 1, 1996, the last nuclear missiles were brought from Ukraine into Russia. The next day, Ukraine has lost its status of a nuclear state after signing the Budapest Memorandum. The US, the UK and Russia gave their assurances that Ukrainian security and sovereignty would not be violated. In exchange, Ukraine promised to give up its nuclear arsenal - one-third of the Soviet nuclear arsenal in total. Ukraine held up our end of the bargain. By 1996, all Ukrainian nuclear warheads were transferred to Russia. Some other military equipment - like strategic bomber planes - was simply scrapped; some were transferred to Russia, and, according to recent investigations, they are now used for missile strikes on Ukraine. In 2014, Russia broke its promises by annexing Crimea and invading Donbas. In 2022, Russia launched a full-scale invasion on Ukraine. Russia would not have dared to attack another nuclear state. The Russian aggression today is a direct consequence of the Budapest Memorandum. Today, Ukraine has launched a successful attack on Russia's strategic aviation. Tu-95 and Tu-160 are capable of launching cruise missiles with nuclear warheads.
0:41

On June 1, 1996, the last nuclear missiles were brought from Ukraine into Russia. The next day, Ukraine has lost its status of a nuclear state after signing the Budapest Memorandum. The US, the UK and Russia gave their assurances that Ukrainian security and sovereignty would not be violated. In exchange, Ukraine promised to give up its nuclear arsenal - one-third of the Soviet nuclear arsenal in total. Ukraine held up our end of the bargain. By 1996, all Ukrainian nuclear warheads were transferred to Russia. Some other military equipment - like strategic bomber planes - was simply scrapped; some were transferred to Russia, and, according to recent investigations, they are now used for missile strikes on Ukraine. In 2014, Russia broke its promises by annexing Crimea and invading Donbas. In 2022, Russia launched a full-scale invasion on Ukraine. Russia would not have dared to attack another nuclear state. The Russian aggression today is a direct consequence of the Budapest Memorandum. Today, Ukraine has launched a successful attack on Russia's strategic aviation. Tu-95 and Tu-160 are capable of launching cruise missiles with nuclear warheads.

Anton Gerashchenko

216,718 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 Rudy Giuliani drops a bombshell on New York City under Mamdani: 7–10K VIOLENT criminals are walking free today who would be behind bars under his or Bloomberg’s leadership. GIULIANI: “One way to visualize it is, there is somewhere between 7 and 8, 9,000 people walking the streets of the City of New York TODAY that would be sitting in jail if I were the mayor or if Bloomberg were the mayor.” “And I’m talking about VIOLENT criminals.”
0:43

🚨 Rudy Giuliani drops a bombshell on New York City under Mamdani: 7–10K VIOLENT criminals are walking free today who would be behind bars under his or Bloomberg’s leadership. GIULIANI: “One way to visualize it is, there is somewhere between 7 and 8, 9,000 people walking the streets of the City of New York TODAY that would be sitting in jail if I were the mayor or if Bloomberg were the mayor.” “And I’m talking about VIOLENT criminals.”

Overton

10,131 次观看 • 4 个月前

I think you will find this handy in the near future. It is important to distinguish between tactical nukes and a full-blown nuclear war, which would follow a “limited nuclear war.” The first two videos show tactical nukes with 0.3 and 1 kilotons of power, which yield lower radiation. The third video is from the Trinity Test, a powerful 20-kiloton nuclear weapon equivalent to the one used in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The fourth video shows the devastating 50-megaton (50,000 kilotons) nuclear bomb—about 3,300 times stronger than the Trinity Test—with a fireball visible from a radius of 1,000 miles.
0:20

I think you will find this handy in the near future. It is important to distinguish between tactical nukes and a full-blown nuclear war, which would follow a “limited nuclear war.” The first two videos show tactical nukes with 0.3 and 1 kilotons of power, which yield lower radiation. The third video is from the Trinity Test, a powerful 20-kiloton nuclear weapon equivalent to the one used in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The fourth video shows the devastating 50-megaton (50,000 kilotons) nuclear bomb—about 3,300 times stronger than the Trinity Test—with a fireball visible from a radius of 1,000 miles.

Open Minded Approach

20,039 次观看 • 4 个月前

"Russia was so paranoid that the United States was going to launch a preemptive nuclear attack against it during the Cold War, that it created a Dead Hand system... They created a system whereby ground sensors would be able to determine nuclear bombs hitting Russian soil, and if they weren't hearing from the nuclear command and control—the idea being that it had been taken out in this preemptive nuclear strike—the Dead Hand system would launch all of Russia's remaining nuclear weapons, which were like 30,000 at the time. It would launch all of them without even needing a hand to push the button. Hence the name: The Dead Hand." Annie Jacobsen
9:16

"Russia was so paranoid that the United States was going to launch a preemptive nuclear attack against it during the Cold War, that it created a Dead Hand system... They created a system whereby ground sensors would be able to determine nuclear bombs hitting Russian soil, and if they weren't hearing from the nuclear command and control—the idea being that it had been taken out in this preemptive nuclear strike—the Dead Hand system would launch all of Russia's remaining nuclear weapons, which were like 30,000 at the time. It would launch all of them without even needing a hand to push the button. Hence the name: The Dead Hand." Annie Jacobsen

Shawn Ryan

471,409 次观看 • 1 年前

🇺🇦 Jesse Eisenberg witnessed a Russian attack on Ukraine and asked: “What if they bombed New York?” During his visit, the actor was woken by an air-raid alert and had to take shelter. In the morning, he saw the aftermath of the Russian strike. “It was devastating, horrifying, outrageous and tragic. I kept thinking: what would happen if they bombed New York — or my own home?” Eisenberg said.
0:23

🇺🇦 Jesse Eisenberg witnessed a Russian attack on Ukraine and asked: “What if they bombed New York?” During his visit, the actor was woken by an air-raid alert and had to take shelter. In the morning, he saw the aftermath of the Russian strike. “It was devastating, horrifying, outrageous and tragic. I kept thinking: what would happen if they bombed New York — or my own home?” Eisenberg said.

NEXTA

60,221 次观看 • 28 天前

🇺🇸🇷🇺 "IF RUSSIA ARMED VENEZUELA DURING A U.S. INVASION, WASHINGTON WOULD CALL IT AN ACT OF WAR - BUT IT’S JUST AID IN UKRAINE" More weapons, more red lines crossed, and still no nuclear retaliation. But what if the roles were reversed? Would Washington tolerate what Moscow has? Or has the West redefined the rules of escalation only when it benefits them? "The U.S. has directly fired ballistic missiles into Russia, imagine if that happened the other way around. Every supposed red line has been crossed, including strikes deep inside Russian territory. If Russia and China armed Venezuela during a U.S. invasion, Washington would call it an act of war. The U.S. would absolutely be on a nuclear slope if its cities were under nightly drone attacks. This is not restraint, it's selective outrage dressed as strategy." Mark Sleboda
4:07

🇺🇸🇷🇺 "IF RUSSIA ARMED VENEZUELA DURING A U.S. INVASION, WASHINGTON WOULD CALL IT AN ACT OF WAR - BUT IT’S JUST AID IN UKRAINE" More weapons, more red lines crossed, and still no nuclear retaliation. But what if the roles were reversed? Would Washington tolerate what Moscow has? Or has the West redefined the rules of escalation only when it benefits them? "The U.S. has directly fired ballistic missiles into Russia, imagine if that happened the other way around. Every supposed red line has been crossed, including strikes deep inside Russian territory. If Russia and China armed Venezuela during a U.S. invasion, Washington would call it an act of war. The U.S. would absolutely be on a nuclear slope if its cities were under nightly drone attacks. This is not restraint, it's selective outrage dressed as strategy." Mark Sleboda

Mario Nawfal

77,097 次观看 • 8 个月前

Alastair Crooke: The US🇺🇸 may have signalled that it will resume nuclear weapons testing because Trump misunderstood a Russian missile test as a nuclear test ‘It seems to be based on a misunderstanding. Allegedly, Trump has proposed the idea of nuclear tests in response to Russian nuclear tests. But there hasn’t been a Russian nuclear test. The Burevestnik missile, that was publicised these recent days, like the Oreshnik. But this one has a nuclear power. It has got a propulsion system that is nuclear-based. Its warhead isn’t. There isn’t a nuclear warhead on it. It is a conventional warhead, but it is just instead of having a rocket propulsion, it has a nuclear drive that propels it. And this is why it’s able to stay aloft for a very long time, and in fact traverse the whole globe. But it’s nuclear propulsion, not a nuclear weapon. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Now, whether the Russians have been testing underground before, I doubt it…I’m sure they would have taken every opportunity to say it if they thought they had detected Russian or Chinese underground tests.’ -Alastair Crooke, the former Middle East Advisor to the EU Foreign Policy Chief, on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇
3:42

Alastair Crooke: The US🇺🇸 may have signalled that it will resume nuclear weapons testing because Trump misunderstood a Russian missile test as a nuclear test ‘It seems to be based on a misunderstanding. Allegedly, Trump has proposed the idea of nuclear tests in response to Russian nuclear tests. But there hasn’t been a Russian nuclear test. The Burevestnik missile, that was publicised these recent days, like the Oreshnik. But this one has a nuclear power. It has got a propulsion system that is nuclear-based. Its warhead isn’t. There isn’t a nuclear warhead on it. It is a conventional warhead, but it is just instead of having a rocket propulsion, it has a nuclear drive that propels it. And this is why it’s able to stay aloft for a very long time, and in fact traverse the whole globe. But it’s nuclear propulsion, not a nuclear weapon. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Did Trump understand that? Or did he just think this was a new nuclear weapon that Russia was testing? He probably didn’t understand that it wasn’t. It was just its propulsion mechanism that is nuclear, but not its warhead. Now, whether the Russians have been testing underground before, I doubt it…I’m sure they would have taken every opportunity to say it if they thought they had detected Russian or Chinese underground tests.’ -Alastair Crooke, the former Middle East Advisor to the EU Foreign Policy Chief, on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW BELOW IN THE REPLIES👇

Going Underground

52,238 次观看 • 9 个月前