Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

What's the Difference Between a No-Hitter and a Perfect Game? Most people think a no-hitter and a perfect game are basically the same thing. They’re not. Here’s how rare they are: There have been over 330 no-hitters pitched in MLB history. But there have only been 24 perfect games....

49,460 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The World Cup Ball Is Broken! NASA once studied a soccer ball. Not a rocket — a soccer ball. Because the way it flew was so broken it was humiliating the best goalkeepers on earth. Soccer spent fifteen years making sure that never happened again. It’s happening again. This year’s ball is called the Trionda — “three waves” — for the first World Cup ever hosted by three nations. Canada’s maple leaf, Mexico’s eagle, America’s star, all swirling together across just four panels — the fewest of any World Cup ball in history. It’s genuinely beautiful. Which is exactly what they said about the last high-tech ball, right before it ruined everyone’s summer. Right now, mid-tournament, the goalkeepers are revolting again. Former England keeper Joe Hart went on the BBC and said it flat out: something’s up with this ball. Keeper after keeper beaten by long, no-spin shots they swear move wrong. #WorldCup #WorldCup2026 #Trionda #Jabulani #SportsFacts DISCLAIMER: We do our best to research every story we share — but facts, sources, and memories aren’t always perfect. These videos are meant to entertain, educate, and start conversations, not to serve as definitive historical accounts. Always double-check the facts for yourself, form your own opinions, and most of all, enjoy the story. This video contains brief clips used for commentary, criticism, and educational storytelling purposes. All footage is used in a transformative context. Oh… if you disagree or think I’ve gotten it all wrong, Fansplain Me in the comments!

fansplainme

34,888 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

.Naval: Marxism, besides denying human incentives, also has a problem where it just assumes that everything is finite and we're all just dividing up the same small set of things. Well, the cavemen didn't have color TVs, computers, cars, antibiotics, or medicine. They were not sitting around dividing up the same few things. The knowledge grows, and we create more. It also tends to assume that we can freeze frame at some point in society and say, 'Well, we have enough different kinds of sneakers, enough different kinds of housing, we just need to allocate it better.' And that is not how anything works. David Deutsch has a great definition of wealth, which he says is the set of physical transformations that we can affect. So, when you think about it that way, you realize that knowledge is not just stored capital in the classic Marxist sense (capital vs. labor), but it's also knowledge on what to do with that capital. The cavemen or Palaeolithic ancestors had access to all the same resources we did. They were living on the same Earth, and by the modern environmentalist arguments, they had a better Earth—they had more to do things with. But yet, they couldn't do anything. They were not wealthy by any stretch of the imagination. Why? Because of knowledge. Life is not a zero-sum game, it's a positive-sum game. But we are hardwired to think it's a zero-sum game because, for millions or billions of years, there was no such thing as wealth. There was no such thing as persistent knowledge creation in the environment. What you had was a small amount of resources being divided up, and most of the games were status games—'Which monkey outranks which other monkey?' And that decides which monkey gets to eat first. We played that game for a billion years. Now, we come onto a recent game where, actually, we can all eat, and the big problem is obesity. It's no longer starvation. The big problem is boredom. It's not actually work. There's enough work. So, in this environment, switching your evolved mindset from a zero-sum game to a positive-sum game where we can all win, if we create knowledge together and use the resources that we have to create more resources and more wealth, that's the game we all need to be playing now.

Arjun Khemani

163,525 просмотров • 1 год назад

I love and support Ukraine not only because it is my country and my people. Not because we are so perfect and good. Ukraine has as many internal problems as other countries, and in some areas, perhaps even more. And yes, we have all kinds of people, there are good and bad, there are those who do good, but, unfortunately, there are also those who do evil and commit crimes. Just like in your country, there are such people too. I support Ukraine because the right to life and to one's own path is not the privilege of "perfect" nations, but a fundamental human right. No one is less worthy of protection simply because their country has flaws, mistakes, or a difficult history. If that were true, no country in the world would have the right to exist. Because no one is perfect or free from imperfections. Supporting Ukraine means refusing to accept violence and aggression as the norm. This is a rejection of the logic that someone has the right to destroy others simply because they feel like it. Today, it's Ukraine. Tomorrow, with this approach, it could be anyone. And that's the point. Not idealization. Not slogans. But a simple moral choice: side with those defending their home, or turn a blind eye to evil until it knocks on your door. Truth requires no justification. You don't need to be an expert to see the difference between those who defend themselves and those who come to kill, destroy, and erase the identity of others. When cities, hospitals, schools, and homes are bombed, it's no longer a "complex conflict" but an obvious crime. Supporting Ukraine is about memory. About respect for the lessons of history, which have cost humanity too dearly. Every time aggression was called "liberation," "historical justice," or "not everything is so clear-cut," these words were followed by mass tragedies. To ignore this is to knowingly follow the same path.

Igor Kyivskyi

19,395 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Kevin O’Connell tells Vikings QBs he doesn't care if they throw interceptions in training camp “There are so many things in society, not even just football nowadays, where we want to decide in a moment this guy can or can’t, this guy’s a success or failure. And it’s just not in alignment with the reality of the position or our game.” “Everything should be driven by process, and part of process is failure. Every year in training camp I give my yearly State of the Union on the first practice: ‘Just as a heads up, I’m not going to be commenting on you guys taking your stats every single day. So-and-so went 6-of-11 with two interceptions, and then we chart it for the whole training camp and decide who won or lost this position or quarterback battle.’” “I challenge the quarterbacks all the time: we’re against Brian Flores every day. This is going to be a 10-out-of-10 stress for all of us. There are going to be good days and there are going to be bad days, but I want you to be aggressive with your decision-making.” “How will we know on third-and-eight in Week 12 that you can try to fit a ball in there to Justin Jefferson on a backside in-cut? How will we know if you don’t try to do it now?” “So when you do it now, and you take the proper footwork and try to throw it into a tight window and the ball gets tipped and intercepted, let’s go back and look at it first. I’ve got no problem with the decision. What was your footwork like? Were you in your base, balance, body position? Were you playing on the timing of the play? Did you make the protection call you needed?” “If you did all those things and it was just a blade of grass different from being the best completion you had all day, now you know.” “I can finish up a practice and go to the podium and have people say, ‘So-and-so really struggled today, didn’t you think?’ And I’m like, there’s not enough time in the day for me to explain all the reasons why you’re wrong. We’re going to go in the quarterback room, we’re going to watch it, and we’re going to be better tomorrow.”

Josh Chambers

353,161 просмотров • 4 дней назад

It’s really important for Americans to realize that this is a bigggg misconception that applies to all immigration, not just China. The people who come over the border, regardless of whether they’re Chinese, Indian, Mexican, Central American, generally are “not their best”. I use quotes because that’s something Trump said, “they don’t send their best”. And he is absolutely correct. There are exceptions, but the people who cross the border, tend to be criminals, people who can’t a get a job, the uneducated, etc. Why? The educated can get jobs in their home countries. Or can immigrate to the US legally (at least used to). If you have a criminal record in your home country, you don’t have one in the USA. If you screwed up and dropped out of high school, you can cut vegetables in the back of a restaurant. Law abiding citizens of foreign countries, no matter what you think about the greatness of America, are not thrilled to break the law and enter a country like this. This immigration for many if not most of these countries is economic. Most of these people are not coming for a better life. They are coming for the currency arbitrage. Or at least that used to be the case. From 2021 to 2024 border crossing immigrants were getting free housing and cash debit cards (look it up) in places like NYC. So that, again, brought another type of person, but, again, it was “not their best”. So, unless you’re in a country that is experiencing civil war, or maybe a total basket case, you mainly go to the US via the illegal border, not for a better life but for currency arbitrage or because you don’t have a better option in your home country which has made it tough for you to get a job for whatever reason. Okay, now let’s talk a bit more about China. For the Chinese that cross the border, life is way better in China. They speak the language. There is less crime. They’re surrounded by their family. They don’t need a car in most places. It’s the same culture and there friends are there. Life is pretty good in China, and because they’re going to work hard in the USA too, it’s probably better in China across every single socioeconomic quartile of society too (unless you have a criminal record or can’t get a job for whatever reason). So when Americans write things like “Chinese are dying to come to America”, there could be a political issue there eg on the wrong side of the communist party, but it’s mainly Americope, something we tell ourselves. It may have been true 10 years ago, but it’s no longer true. America needs to change that. We need to go back to when everyone wanted to come here, not just for money but for a better life. And this is something you should believe even if you don’t want immigration. If this keeps up, if we keep letting life decline, eventually the currency will too, and all these people who actually work quite hard will not only stop coming, but many will leave too. The replies are all going to basically be like (without saying it) “shut up white American. You don’t know” Yeah but I do know because I talk to people who people who look like me don’t talk to. In the below video (before I got good at short form videos) I had just been thrown out of a migrant detention center.

molson 🧠⚙️

42,648 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад