Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

‼️WHCD Attendee BLOWS THE WHISTLE —"We Know It's STAGED" 👀 An attendee who was actually inside the ballroom at the White House Correspondents' Dinner when the shots rang out—just went on record stating the obvious: "the entire incident was a manufactured distraction." While all our feeds were completely flooded...

CartmanReacts's profile picture

Cartman Reacts

6,992 subscribers

22,104 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsScience & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

They mocked him. They laughed at him. They ignored the people who were crying out for something different. At that Correspondents’ Dinner, the political class thought they were untouchable. They thought the “joke” was on Trump. But what they didn’t understand is this: When you mock a man who represents everyday Americans, you’re not mocking him. You’re mocking the people. And that spark? It lit a fire. That same dynamic is playing out right now. When I got into this Senate race, the establishment laughed. They called it a “vanity project.” They said, “Nobody knows who he is.” They said, “He can’t win.” Now they’re spending millions trying to stop me. Why? Because they see what’s happening. The people are done with career politicians. Done with being managed instead of represented. This isn’t just about Democrats. This is about Republicans too. They want fighters. They want conviction. They want someone who actually believes what they say, and has the backbone to stand on it. The will of the people, vox populi, always wins in the end. We the People. That’s the spark. That’s the fire. And that’s the future of this great nation. The time is NOW.
1:12

They mocked him. They laughed at him. They ignored the people who were crying out for something different. At that Correspondents’ Dinner, the political class thought they were untouchable. They thought the “joke” was on Trump. But what they didn’t understand is this: When you mock a man who represents everyday Americans, you’re not mocking him. You’re mocking the people. And that spark? It lit a fire. That same dynamic is playing out right now. When I got into this Senate race, the establishment laughed. They called it a “vanity project.” They said, “Nobody knows who he is.” They said, “He can’t win.” Now they’re spending millions trying to stop me. Why? Because they see what’s happening. The people are done with career politicians. Done with being managed instead of represented. This isn’t just about Democrats. This is about Republicans too. They want fighters. They want conviction. They want someone who actually believes what they say, and has the backbone to stand on it. The will of the people, vox populi, always wins in the end. We the People. That’s the spark. That’s the fire. And that’s the future of this great nation. The time is NOW.

Wesley Hunt

83,854 views • 7 months ago

JUST IN: Local law enforcement says Secret Service is throwing them "under the bus," claims USSS visited the rally location *one month* before and told them "exactly what to do." A source who spoke with the Daily Mail was furious over claims that they were responsible for the area "outside the perimeter. "The Secret Service came out here more than a month ahead of time and met with all the local agencies," an officer said. "They tell us exactly what to do, exactly what they want, and exactly how they want it. It's all on them." "They're absolutely passing the buck." Odd.
2:08

JUST IN: Local law enforcement says Secret Service is throwing them "under the bus," claims USSS visited the rally location *one month* before and told them "exactly what to do." A source who spoke with the Daily Mail was furious over claims that they were responsible for the area "outside the perimeter. "The Secret Service came out here more than a month ahead of time and met with all the local agencies," an officer said. "They tell us exactly what to do, exactly what they want, and exactly how they want it. It's all on them." "They're absolutely passing the buck." Odd.

Collin Rugg

6,869,399 views • 2 years ago

Day in and day out we are subjected to insane levels of propaganda from our media. They pay for these polls and if the results suit their narrative they use them to control the sentiments of the population. “Canadians want” the “majority of Canadians are willing” “Canadians agree” I was at a birthday dinner tonight and they had CTV News playing in the background on the TV, I couldn’t believe the anti-American / elbows up stories they were pumping out, and that just the evening “news” We are seeing what this is doing to people in real time. They can make people literally hate anyone they want, be it politicians, countries, unvaccinated, you name it. And it sadly works very well.
2:21

Day in and day out we are subjected to insane levels of propaganda from our media. They pay for these polls and if the results suit their narrative they use them to control the sentiments of the population. “Canadians want” the “majority of Canadians are willing” “Canadians agree” I was at a birthday dinner tonight and they had CTV News playing in the background on the TV, I couldn’t believe the anti-American / elbows up stories they were pumping out, and that just the evening “news” We are seeing what this is doing to people in real time. They can make people literally hate anyone they want, be it politicians, countries, unvaccinated, you name it. And it sadly works very well.

Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

22,013 views • 21 days ago

‼️BOMBSHELL: Candace Owens Just Revealed MORE White House LEAKS That Prove The WHCD Shooting Could Have Been STAGED! 👀 Candace Owens just dropped a massive bombshell regarding the September 10th assassination, and it aligns exactly with the state-level anomalies we have been tracking. According to newly leaked emails, individuals affiliated with the White House believe the official narrative of the shooting was STAGED. The leaks point to massive "security protocol anomalies" that night—including insiders who were inexplicably preparing to return to the White House for a presser as the event was unfolding. But here is the most disturbing thread: The unnatural union between the military and Erika Kirk. Owens is asking the exact question the mainstream media refuses to touch: Why is the widow allegedly considered a "digital asset" to the military? Are we looking at Operation Mockingbird 2.0? Is the "would-be Jackie Kennedy" actually working as an operative for the State to control the fallout? This aligns perfectly with the federal surveillance cover-ups we are exposing. The official narrative is collapsing, and the leaks are starting to flood in. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and Watch her full episode below and judge for yourself. 👇 Is Erika Kirk a state asset? Drop your thoughts in the comments. ⚠️My channel is under attack, and they are trying to bankrupt me to shut down my investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination and silence the truth. If you value independent journalism and want to keep this investigation alive, please support my work here: 🔗 💪
0:57

‼️BOMBSHELL: Candace Owens Just Revealed MORE White House LEAKS That Prove The WHCD Shooting Could Have Been STAGED! 👀 Candace Owens just dropped a massive bombshell regarding the September 10th assassination, and it aligns exactly with the state-level anomalies we have been tracking. According to newly leaked emails, individuals affiliated with the White House believe the official narrative of the shooting was STAGED. The leaks point to massive "security protocol anomalies" that night—including insiders who were inexplicably preparing to return to the White House for a presser as the event was unfolding. But here is the most disturbing thread: The unnatural union between the military and Erika Kirk. Owens is asking the exact question the mainstream media refuses to touch: Why is the widow allegedly considered a "digital asset" to the military? Are we looking at Operation Mockingbird 2.0? Is the "would-be Jackie Kennedy" actually working as an operative for the State to control the fallout? This aligns perfectly with the federal surveillance cover-ups we are exposing. The official narrative is collapsing, and the leaks are starting to flood in. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and Watch her full episode below and judge for yourself. 👇 Is Erika Kirk a state asset? Drop your thoughts in the comments. ⚠️My channel is under attack, and they are trying to bankrupt me to shut down my investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination and silence the truth. If you value independent journalism and want to keep this investigation alive, please support my work here: 🔗 💪

Project Constitution

39,412 views • 4 months ago

Walz: This is a brazen use of force. They want us to bend the knee. They want us to capitulate. The way we give them what they want is allow them to use this as an excuse to put more troops on the ground, use them as an excuse to show that these are violent protests I saw an individual show up there with the intent to antagonize folks who were peacefully protesting with a bullhorn to scream at them, and again, the desire to move on that individual is exactly what they want because our respect for the first amendment means we will expect and respect all opinions. If this individual is there expressing support for ice, that's their constitutional right to do so, and they need to be protected.
1:21

Walz: This is a brazen use of force. They want us to bend the knee. They want us to capitulate. The way we give them what they want is allow them to use this as an excuse to put more troops on the ground, use them as an excuse to show that these are violent protests I saw an individual show up there with the intent to antagonize folks who were peacefully protesting with a bullhorn to scream at them, and again, the desire to move on that individual is exactly what they want because our respect for the first amendment means we will expect and respect all opinions. If this individual is there expressing support for ice, that's their constitutional right to do so, and they need to be protected.

Acyn

23,646 views • 8 months ago

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”
1:48

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”

Acyn

1,065,464 views • 6 months ago

"You want to know the most insidious and horrific part of these 6 Democrats encouraging the military to disobey the orders of the Commander in Chief is?" "It's that they know exactly what the consequences of doing that are." "They are evil, but they are not stupid." "They know, and they are encouraging it anyway to advance a false narrative." "Mark Kelly is a traitor and these Democrats are evil." Where is the lie though? Seriously.
1:23

"You want to know the most insidious and horrific part of these 6 Democrats encouraging the military to disobey the orders of the Commander in Chief is?" "It's that they know exactly what the consequences of doing that are." "They are evil, but they are not stupid." "They know, and they are encouraging it anyway to advance a false narrative." "Mark Kelly is a traitor and these Democrats are evil." Where is the lie though? Seriously.

AmericanPapaBear™

31,169 views • 10 months ago

🚨 SHOCKING Eyewitness Details from the Trump Dinner Shooting Ainsley: “Should we go back out and continue the dinner?” They had no idea if it was one shooter or more gunmen coming. Turned out he was a lone wolf, but at the time it was pure panic. President Trump was rushed straight to the White House for a press conference and wants the dinner rescheduled in the next 30 days. Lawrence Jones: “I heard it and knew instantly — that’s a gunshot.” But many people thought it was just a server dropping trays. Total confusion. Brian Kilmeade: “You see people running and you’re thinking, are they chasing somebody? Where’s the shooter?” Secret Service everywhere. Then worrying maybe the shooter was dressed like them. Everyone on the dais hit the floor. Brian was sitting two seats from Erika Kirk (who was traumatized) and right next to Tulsi Gabbard. They grabbed her immediately. He tried to get a look behind the dais with Brett Baier and others before they were told to evacuate. They were herded back to the pre-party room, only for armed agents to burst in yelling “What are you doing here? Get out!” Then they rushed everyone out through the kitchen because someone was hiding. Comms between agencies were a mess — different groups not talking to each other. Ainsley pointed out this is exactly why Trump wants the White House ballroom built. A federal judge stopped it in March, but Trump says it’s still happening. It was designed with top military and Secret Service input for maximum security. Even John Fetterman posted: “Drop the TDS and build the White House ballroom… We were there, front and center. That venue wasn’t built for this.” Lawrence: “We still have to secure events outside the ballroom too. Not every event can be at a federal building. What a disgrace as a country. We gotta do better.” Ainsley: “After three assassination attempts, everyone sees how dangerous this job is. Just like post-9/11 airport security, it’s inconvenient, but worth it to keep the President safe.” This is the reality of the hate the left has been stoking for years. Build the ballroom. Secure the President. Enough is enough.
6:30

🚨 SHOCKING Eyewitness Details from the Trump Dinner Shooting Ainsley: “Should we go back out and continue the dinner?” They had no idea if it was one shooter or more gunmen coming. Turned out he was a lone wolf, but at the time it was pure panic. President Trump was rushed straight to the White House for a press conference and wants the dinner rescheduled in the next 30 days. Lawrence Jones: “I heard it and knew instantly — that’s a gunshot.” But many people thought it was just a server dropping trays. Total confusion. Brian Kilmeade: “You see people running and you’re thinking, are they chasing somebody? Where’s the shooter?” Secret Service everywhere. Then worrying maybe the shooter was dressed like them. Everyone on the dais hit the floor. Brian was sitting two seats from Erika Kirk (who was traumatized) and right next to Tulsi Gabbard. They grabbed her immediately. He tried to get a look behind the dais with Brett Baier and others before they were told to evacuate. They were herded back to the pre-party room, only for armed agents to burst in yelling “What are you doing here? Get out!” Then they rushed everyone out through the kitchen because someone was hiding. Comms between agencies were a mess — different groups not talking to each other. Ainsley pointed out this is exactly why Trump wants the White House ballroom built. A federal judge stopped it in March, but Trump says it’s still happening. It was designed with top military and Secret Service input for maximum security. Even John Fetterman posted: “Drop the TDS and build the White House ballroom… We were there, front and center. That venue wasn’t built for this.” Lawrence: “We still have to secure events outside the ballroom too. Not every event can be at a federal building. What a disgrace as a country. We gotta do better.” Ainsley: “After three assassination attempts, everyone sees how dangerous this job is. Just like post-9/11 airport security, it’s inconvenient, but worth it to keep the President safe.” This is the reality of the hate the left has been stoking for years. Build the ballroom. Secure the President. Enough is enough.

Gunther Eagleman™

122,107 views • 4 months ago

Elon Musk: We will not accept an anointed class of journalists who tell us what to think. “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Interview with the BBC, April 12, 2023
0:57

Elon Musk: We will not accept an anointed class of journalists who tell us what to think. “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Interview with the BBC, April 12, 2023

ELON CLIPS

1,266,090 views • 1 year ago

ELON: WE WILL NOT ACCEPT AN ANOINTED CLASS OF JOURNALISTS WHO TELL US WHAT TO THINK “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023, Elon Musk
0:57

ELON: WE WILL NOT ACCEPT AN ANOINTED CLASS OF JOURNALISTS WHO TELL US WHAT TO THINK “What we're not going to do is say that there's some anointed class of journalists who are the special ones who get to tell everyone what they should think. It should be up to the people what they think. And even if an article is completely accurate, comprehensive, and everything, in writing that article, the media is choosing the narrative. They're deciding what to write an article about. So, I'm hopeful that this can be more a case of the public choosing the narrative as opposed to the media choosing the narrative. At least a combination of the media and the public choosing the narrative, and the public getting to weigh in on stories if they think that they should add something to it, or we've got something wrong. And over time, I think if Twitter is the best source of truth, it will succeed. And if we are not the vessels of truth, we will fail.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023, Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

115,251 views • 1 year ago

We have seen this story time and time again. Their demands will never end. We just want to study… We just want a temporary work permit… We just need an extension… Now we want permanent residency These individuals know exactly what they are doing. And when they signed the documents knowing full well it was supposed to be temporary, they knew they were going to try and game the system the minute their “foot was in the door”
0:53

We have seen this story time and time again. Their demands will never end. We just want to study… We just want a temporary work permit… We just need an extension… Now we want permanent residency These individuals know exactly what they are doing. And when they signed the documents knowing full well it was supposed to be temporary, they knew they were going to try and game the system the minute their “foot was in the door”

Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱

38,227 views • 1 month ago

CNN made sure to say the shooter was “possibly white” before any facts were confirmed. They could’ve waited, but they didn’t. Why? Because it primes the audience to view the story through a specific racial lens. One that aligns with their preferred narrative about race and violence in America. If the suspect had been “possibly black”, they would’ve waited. But saying “possibly white” fits the narrative they want to push. As we now know, the shooter wasn’t white. This is the game legacy media plays, especially on the left. It’s a problem.
1:22

CNN made sure to say the shooter was “possibly white” before any facts were confirmed. They could’ve waited, but they didn’t. Why? Because it primes the audience to view the story through a specific racial lens. One that aligns with their preferred narrative about race and violence in America. If the suspect had been “possibly black”, they would’ve waited. But saying “possibly white” fits the narrative they want to push. As we now know, the shooter wasn’t white. This is the game legacy media plays, especially on the left. It’s a problem.

Jeffery Mead

421,919 views • 1 year ago

‼️BREAKING: Candace Exposes MAJOR White House LEAK After the WHCD Shooting —EMAIL Sent Out About WHCD And Erika Kirk They Tried To Rescind! 👀 Candace Owens just dropped a major scoop that goes all the way to the top. Shortly after the White House Correspondents’ Dinner (WHCD) shooting, the White House reportedly sent out an internal email regarding Erika Kirk and her infamous "I just want to go home" moment—only to get caught in a desperate scramble to rescind it. What we know so far: The "Accidental" Leak: The White House sent a specific email that was never meant for a wide audience, leading to an immediate panic. Candace confirms the email directly involves Erika Kirk and the viral "I want to go home" drama from the night of the shooting. The White House then attempted to rescind the communication once they realized the "major scoop" was out. Why is the White House so concerned about Erika Kirk's reaction to the shooting? What was in that email that caused a total panic in the West Wing? Candace is digging into the rabbit hole—and it’s looking more and more like the "official" story is falling apart. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and Watch the full BREAKDOWN on her podcast below. ⚠️My channel is under attack, and they are trying to financially bankrupt me to shut down my investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination and silence the truth. I need your support to keep going; if you value independent journalism and want to keep this investigation alive, please support my work here: 🔗
0:45

‼️BREAKING: Candace Exposes MAJOR White House LEAK After the WHCD Shooting —EMAIL Sent Out About WHCD And Erika Kirk They Tried To Rescind! 👀 Candace Owens just dropped a major scoop that goes all the way to the top. Shortly after the White House Correspondents’ Dinner (WHCD) shooting, the White House reportedly sent out an internal email regarding Erika Kirk and her infamous "I just want to go home" moment—only to get caught in a desperate scramble to rescind it. What we know so far: The "Accidental" Leak: The White House sent a specific email that was never meant for a wide audience, leading to an immediate panic. Candace confirms the email directly involves Erika Kirk and the viral "I want to go home" drama from the night of the shooting. The White House then attempted to rescind the communication once they realized the "major scoop" was out. Why is the White House so concerned about Erika Kirk's reaction to the shooting? What was in that email that caused a total panic in the West Wing? Candace is digging into the rabbit hole—and it’s looking more and more like the "official" story is falling apart. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and Watch the full BREAKDOWN on her podcast below. ⚠️My channel is under attack, and they are trying to financially bankrupt me to shut down my investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination and silence the truth. I need your support to keep going; if you value independent journalism and want to keep this investigation alive, please support my work here: 🔗

Project Constitution

78,233 views • 4 months ago

“They claim we are in Congo looking for minerals. That this is what causes our problems with Congo. They say our country, Rwanda is small and that we want to go into Congo to expand it. But they try to avoid the real issue, which they also know, and in which they themselves are involved, concerning the Interahamwe militia who are in Congo. The Interahamwe were settled there. The Interahamwe were armed, both those who were already there and new ones, some were integrated into the Congolese army, while others operate alongside it. How does the world expect us to behave? Just listen to them and do whatever they ask us to do, even if it is leading to our own destruction?” President Kagame | #Umushyikirano2026
3:24

“They claim we are in Congo looking for minerals. That this is what causes our problems with Congo. They say our country, Rwanda is small and that we want to go into Congo to expand it. But they try to avoid the real issue, which they also know, and in which they themselves are involved, concerning the Interahamwe militia who are in Congo. The Interahamwe were settled there. The Interahamwe were armed, both those who were already there and new ones, some were integrated into the Congolese army, while others operate alongside it. How does the world expect us to behave? Just listen to them and do whatever they ask us to do, even if it is leading to our own destruction?” President Kagame | #Umushyikirano2026

Presidency | Rwanda

57,492 views • 7 months ago

The N-word No white person actually wants to say the n-word...publicly. There is no contingent of white people who believe that saying the n-word somehow affirms their First Amendment right. And I won't pretend that it is a thing. Any white person who wants to say it will say it when the cameras are off or on. But in 2026, some whites want to say it only while the cameras are rolling. Why? Because racism is an industry and the n-word is a commodity. It's like an illicit drug whose dealers are white right-wing grifters and black liberals. Those are literally the only groups who care about that word. Everyone else knows how to be a normal civil human being. Only bankrupt whites are dying, say the word. Bankrupt intellectually, morally, and/or financially. When a person struggles intellectually, they tend to struggle financially. And there are interests who finance chaos. Remember George Soros and his reputation for financing discord in nations? There is nothing different here. A poor, struggling white can run to social media with rage bait to make a living while national and foreign interests fund it. Remember when the SPLC was accused of financing the same white supremacist groups they were supposed to be fighting? Outward racism is so uncommon that it needs to be manufactured. The black liberal is unemployed without the racist white. So, it is in his best interest to find and feed into racism. His wallet depends on it. The white racist and the black liberal have a symbiotic relationship. They need each other. Without one, there would be no other. And what do they have in common? A lot! They both identify with their race before their god. They both agree that the white man has all the power. They both believe in race-based employment practices. They both hate black men. And of course, they both use race as a tool to reach a certain level of success. The only thing that separates them is their skin color. Otherwise, you wouldn't be able to tell them apart. What we're seeing is a psychological operation designed to divide and conquer the people. This is the white version of black lives matter. This is the White Lives Matter movement. The financial interests saw how well BLM worked, so they are rebooting the same game plan, but with white people. The white people who are falling for this fall into two categories. Low IQ and grifters. The grifters do not have enough intelligence to get social media engagement from ingenuity and invention, so they pick the low-hanging fruit of rage bait. The low IQ blacks feed into it, and the low IQ whites follow the trend because they see the enormous engagement. However, that engagement isn't real. Those are trolls and bot farms from the same financial interests who wish to see this country divided. A united people are unstoppable, and the financial interests know this. Our politicians, who are fed by the financial interests, know this. Politics runs on problems. But the severe problems are never addressed because the petty ones are kept on the front page. In order to right this ship, we must increase our intelligence. We must learn where to place our focus. And require more from our elected officials and influencers. They runts salivate when the headline reads white vs black. It is a cash event for them. I say, we need to let them starve!
4:13

The N-word No white person actually wants to say the n-word...publicly. There is no contingent of white people who believe that saying the n-word somehow affirms their First Amendment right. And I won't pretend that it is a thing. Any white person who wants to say it will say it when the cameras are off or on. But in 2026, some whites want to say it only while the cameras are rolling. Why? Because racism is an industry and the n-word is a commodity. It's like an illicit drug whose dealers are white right-wing grifters and black liberals. Those are literally the only groups who care about that word. Everyone else knows how to be a normal civil human being. Only bankrupt whites are dying, say the word. Bankrupt intellectually, morally, and/or financially. When a person struggles intellectually, they tend to struggle financially. And there are interests who finance chaos. Remember George Soros and his reputation for financing discord in nations? There is nothing different here. A poor, struggling white can run to social media with rage bait to make a living while national and foreign interests fund it. Remember when the SPLC was accused of financing the same white supremacist groups they were supposed to be fighting? Outward racism is so uncommon that it needs to be manufactured. The black liberal is unemployed without the racist white. So, it is in his best interest to find and feed into racism. His wallet depends on it. The white racist and the black liberal have a symbiotic relationship. They need each other. Without one, there would be no other. And what do they have in common? A lot! They both identify with their race before their god. They both agree that the white man has all the power. They both believe in race-based employment practices. They both hate black men. And of course, they both use race as a tool to reach a certain level of success. The only thing that separates them is their skin color. Otherwise, you wouldn't be able to tell them apart. What we're seeing is a psychological operation designed to divide and conquer the people. This is the white version of black lives matter. This is the White Lives Matter movement. The financial interests saw how well BLM worked, so they are rebooting the same game plan, but with white people. The white people who are falling for this fall into two categories. Low IQ and grifters. The grifters do not have enough intelligence to get social media engagement from ingenuity and invention, so they pick the low-hanging fruit of rage bait. The low IQ blacks feed into it, and the low IQ whites follow the trend because they see the enormous engagement. However, that engagement isn't real. Those are trolls and bot farms from the same financial interests who wish to see this country divided. A united people are unstoppable, and the financial interests know this. Our politicians, who are fed by the financial interests, know this. Politics runs on problems. But the severe problems are never addressed because the petty ones are kept on the front page. In order to right this ship, we must increase our intelligence. We must learn where to place our focus. And require more from our elected officials and influencers. They runts salivate when the headline reads white vs black. It is a cash event for them. I say, we need to let them starve!

Hotep Jesus

34,741 views • 4 months ago

.Brendan Carr joins Matthew Boyle for our policy event "President Trump is fundamentally reshaping the entire media ecosystem." "For so long, politicians just accepted the narrative that they were handed down, and they didn't want to fight that... They just took the narrative. And President Trump fundamentally disrupted that. He set the terms of the debate." "It really just smashed this facade that those gatekeepers get to control what we think and what we say... The legacy media is the emperor with no clothes."
1:21

.Brendan Carr joins Matthew Boyle for our policy event "President Trump is fundamentally reshaping the entire media ecosystem." "For so long, politicians just accepted the narrative that they were handed down, and they didn't want to fight that... They just took the narrative. And President Trump fundamentally disrupted that. He set the terms of the debate." "It really just smashed this facade that those gatekeepers get to control what we think and what we say... The legacy media is the emperor with no clothes."

Breitbart News

23,196 views • 6 months ago

"If you look at what has happened in Eastern Congo, and everything we have gone through over the past four or five years, and you look at what we have left behind, there is evidence. There are facts that speak for themselves. In Eastern Congo, in Goma and elsewhere, the whole world came together against Rwanda. The whole world lined up against Rwanda: the FDLR and all the groups associated with it that have been mentioned, the Wazalendo, the Burundian forces, the FARDC, the South Africans, and many others. I would rather not spend time naming them all; there were so many. When you look at the scale of what they had assembled there and what they were up against, it is clear that what they were trying to do was wage war against Rwanda, destabilize our country, and reshape it the way they wanted. In fact, they said so themselves. Ordinarily, if someone were to say these things without evidence, you might think they were simply trying to frighten people, to intimidate them. To convince themselves that what they wanted was within reach and that they were going to achieve it, they even brought in mercenaries. You know that many of them passed through here. We gave free passage to our enemies, allowing them to leave a war they waged against us, a war that was never theirs to begin with. That alone tells you something. And it is also something for which our forces, together with others who stood with them, deserve recognition. As for Rwanda, we will always be in a struggle for our very existence. Regardless of those who wish us harm, surrounding us from many sides, one thing remains true: we should and will always be a step ahead of them. It is our right. It is our will. And our history has taught us that we have within ourselves the capacity to defend and protect ourselves whenever necessary. And that is exactly what we will continue to do." President Kagame | Unity Club Meeting
4:11

"If you look at what has happened in Eastern Congo, and everything we have gone through over the past four or five years, and you look at what we have left behind, there is evidence. There are facts that speak for themselves. In Eastern Congo, in Goma and elsewhere, the whole world came together against Rwanda. The whole world lined up against Rwanda: the FDLR and all the groups associated with it that have been mentioned, the Wazalendo, the Burundian forces, the FARDC, the South Africans, and many others. I would rather not spend time naming them all; there were so many. When you look at the scale of what they had assembled there and what they were up against, it is clear that what they were trying to do was wage war against Rwanda, destabilize our country, and reshape it the way they wanted. In fact, they said so themselves. Ordinarily, if someone were to say these things without evidence, you might think they were simply trying to frighten people, to intimidate them. To convince themselves that what they wanted was within reach and that they were going to achieve it, they even brought in mercenaries. You know that many of them passed through here. We gave free passage to our enemies, allowing them to leave a war they waged against us, a war that was never theirs to begin with. That alone tells you something. And it is also something for which our forces, together with others who stood with them, deserve recognition. As for Rwanda, we will always be in a struggle for our very existence. Regardless of those who wish us harm, surrounding us from many sides, one thing remains true: we should and will always be a step ahead of them. It is our right. It is our will. And our history has taught us that we have within ourselves the capacity to defend and protect ourselves whenever necessary. And that is exactly what we will continue to do." President Kagame | Unity Club Meeting

Presidency | Rwanda

81,044 views • 2 months ago

🚨 EXPOSED: Erika Kirk Caught RIGGING THE Q & A Event At GW University This Week - Student Says 3 Of Out The Person's Were PLANTED And Questions Were STAGED!😱 If you needed any more proof that Erika Kirk has completely abandoned the principles Charlie Kirk built his life on, here is the smoking gun. A student who just attended the Turning Point USA event at GW University featuring Erika Kirk and Karoline Leavitt just did an interview blowing the whistle on the entire operation. According to the students on the ground, the "Free Speech" event was a carefully orchestrated, heavily censored theater production. According to the student in the clip: The "Plants": At least 3 out of the 4 people who got to ask questions during the Q&A were literally affiliated with the event/organization. They were planted there. Not Even Students: Half of the people hand-picked to ask questions weren't even actual GW students! The Cut-Off: The organizers rigged the line so their "plants" could ask soft-ball, pro-administration questions. Then, the absolute second an actual student with a dissenting opinion stepped up to the mic, they magically "ran out of time" and shut the entire thing down. Because they can’t handle the heat. This student said it best: He respected Charlie because Charlie actually valued freedom of speech and talked to people who disagreed with him. This new regime is just creating a safe space bubble to protect themselves from real questions—like, perhaps, questions about the investigation into Charlie's death? Charlie Kirk built his entire legacy on the "Prove Me Wrong" table. He was fearless. He wanted to debate the other side, and he never backed down from a tough question from a hostile student. The "New" TPUSA? They are terrified of unscripted moments. The students are waking up. The movement sees right through the facade. Watch the clip for yourself. What happened to the fearless TPUSA we used to know? 👇 From: CALL TO ACTIVISM FOLLOW Them!
1:28

🚨 EXPOSED: Erika Kirk Caught RIGGING THE Q & A Event At GW University This Week - Student Says 3 Of Out The Person's Were PLANTED And Questions Were STAGED!😱 If you needed any more proof that Erika Kirk has completely abandoned the principles Charlie Kirk built his life on, here is the smoking gun. A student who just attended the Turning Point USA event at GW University featuring Erika Kirk and Karoline Leavitt just did an interview blowing the whistle on the entire operation. According to the students on the ground, the "Free Speech" event was a carefully orchestrated, heavily censored theater production. According to the student in the clip: The "Plants": At least 3 out of the 4 people who got to ask questions during the Q&A were literally affiliated with the event/organization. They were planted there. Not Even Students: Half of the people hand-picked to ask questions weren't even actual GW students! The Cut-Off: The organizers rigged the line so their "plants" could ask soft-ball, pro-administration questions. Then, the absolute second an actual student with a dissenting opinion stepped up to the mic, they magically "ran out of time" and shut the entire thing down. Because they can’t handle the heat. This student said it best: He respected Charlie because Charlie actually valued freedom of speech and talked to people who disagreed with him. This new regime is just creating a safe space bubble to protect themselves from real questions—like, perhaps, questions about the investigation into Charlie's death? Charlie Kirk built his entire legacy on the "Prove Me Wrong" table. He was fearless. He wanted to debate the other side, and he never backed down from a tough question from a hostile student. The "New" TPUSA? They are terrified of unscripted moments. The students are waking up. The movement sees right through the facade. Watch the clip for yourself. What happened to the fearless TPUSA we used to know? 👇 From: CALL TO ACTIVISM FOLLOW Them!

Project Constitution

307,036 views • 5 months ago

AOC: “It is time for the North to pull up to the South and let them know exactly what they have uncorked with this injustice. They think they can draw us out of power. They do not know the sleeping giant they just awakened. What they thought was the final blow is actually just the opening silo”
1:32

AOC: “It is time for the North to pull up to the South and let them know exactly what they have uncorked with this injustice. They think they can draw us out of power. They do not know the sleeping giant they just awakened. What they thought was the final blow is actually just the opening silo”

Marco Foster

1,990,267 views • 4 months ago