Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

When a controlled demolition takes place, they use explosives to bring down a building right? It makes a hell of a noise right? Then why don't people play the audio for Building 7 when they and try to sell you controlled demolition for Building 7? Can you figure out... show more

9/11 Revisited

65,461 subscribers

189,617 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Comments

9/11 Revisited1 year ago

Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition. Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades. Article:

BGimpl1 year ago

Imagine the odds needed for a fire to cause a perfect free fall. 3 times in one day. Even explosives could not guarantee a flawless free fall and would have been too obvious and risky. There's a reason I couldn't believe my eyes that day.

9/11 Revisited1 year ago

when it comes to 9/11, truth seekers have been taught NOT to count past 3. WHAT exactly happened to ALL 7 buildings with a WTC prefix on Sept 11, 2001? The following points need to be made regarding what exactly happened to the buildings and the observable evidence at ground zero, that the “9/11 truth movement” never touch on… Article:

batataebife1 year ago

So what brought building 7 down? Just say it you goddamn retards.

9/11 Revisited1 year ago

@batataebif38925 get some intellectual humility and watch the presentation and find out. You can think for yourself, can't you? Dr Wood 2012 presentation: Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.

Lanstorm3691 year ago

What dustified the steel skeleton of towers 1 and 2 as they fell?

der_Kanalräumer 🐭1 year ago

because thermite or nanothermite does not make loud popping noises (like TNT, for example) i don't know if they used nanothermite, but that would at least be an explanation

9/11 Revisited1 year ago

do you even know what thermite is and how it works? I highly recommend studying the blog: The Thermite Free Zone Link: You can download the Refutation of Richard Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023: Gordon Duff, senior editor of Veterans Today, discussing Black Ops, National Security & 9/11. Duff also describes how Nano-Thermite does not exist, except for “6 grams of nano-thermite were made on the ISS according to sources supplied by Christopher Bollyn, ONLY as a failed propellant” and that Steven E. Jones knows nano-thermite does not exist, Jones works for the Defence Intelligence Agency, as well as Richard Gage.

BondGetsitDone1 year ago

All these “It was a controlled demolition” experts fit the profile “When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.”

Related Videos

Hey, Ian Carroll stop gaslighting people and it's time you dig deeper. Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition. Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades. Article:

Hey, Ian Carroll stop gaslighting people and it's time you dig deeper. Building 7 didn't go down due to fires or controlled demolition. Truth seekers have been bamboozled by the "trusted experts" for nearly 2 decades. Article:

9/11 Revisited

167,530 views • 7 months ago

According to architect Richard Gage, the Twin Towers and Building 7 were all brought down by controlled demolitions. "Fires have never brought down a steel-framed high-rise building... ever." "And what we have, unfortunately, is the evidence... of the ten key features of controlled demolition." "The implications of a controlled demolition are dark for our country, because that means somebody besides Al-Qaeda was involved."

According to architect Richard Gage, the Twin Towers and Building 7 were all brought down by controlled demolitions. "Fires have never brought down a steel-framed high-rise building... ever." "And what we have, unfortunately, is the evidence... of the ten key features of controlled demolition." "The implications of a controlled demolition are dark for our country, because that means somebody besides Al-Qaeda was involved."

Red Pill Dispenser

569,655 views • 1 year ago

According to architect Richard Gage, the Twin Towers and Building 7 were all brought down in controlled demolitions. "Fires have never brought down a steel-framed high-rise building... ever." "And what we have, unfortunately, is the evidence... of the ten key features of controlled demolition." "The implications of a controlled demolition are dark for our country, because that means somebody besides Al-Qaeda was involved."

According to architect Richard Gage, the Twin Towers and Building 7 were all brought down in controlled demolitions. "Fires have never brought down a steel-framed high-rise building... ever." "And what we have, unfortunately, is the evidence... of the ten key features of controlled demolition." "The implications of a controlled demolition are dark for our country, because that means somebody besides Al-Qaeda was involved."

Wide Awake Media

114,089 views • 10 months ago

According to architect Richard Gage, the Twin Towers and Building 7 were all brought down in controlled demolitions. "Fires have never brought down a steel-framed high-rise building... ever." "And what we have, unfortunately, is the evidence... of the ten key features of controlled demolition." "The implications of a controlled demolition are dark for our country, because that means somebody besides Al-Qaeda was involved."

According to architect Richard Gage, the Twin Towers and Building 7 were all brought down in controlled demolitions. "Fires have never brought down a steel-framed high-rise building... ever." "And what we have, unfortunately, is the evidence... of the ten key features of controlled demolition." "The implications of a controlled demolition are dark for our country, because that means somebody besides Al-Qaeda was involved."

matrixbot

66,460 views • 4 months ago

Today is Story Saturday - Building 7 "Raw Footage" This Building 7 video compilation of the coverage on September 11, by Vince DeMentri with a special focus on Building 7. Raw behind the scenes and what was broadcast on air. NOTICE: - You can hear vehicles exploding in the background (how does buildings disintegrating, cause vehicles to spontaneously combust, blocks away). - You hear a weird buzzing, some sort of static interference in the audio. - You see his report on the blown up vehicles, limited fires in the building. He DOES NOT report on massive explosions going off in the building. By late afternoon, Building 7 goes down SILENTLY. Thus proving to you Building 7 WAS NOT a conventional controlled demolition. One fact that you won't hear from Richard Gage and architects for an engineered truth, is the anomaly with the seismic reading recorded for the 230 000 ton Building 7. There was no P or S wave, as one would expect for 230 000 tons slamming to the ground! Only surface waves were recorded, as if the weight was lifted off the ground. The seismic reading for Building 7 IS THE SMOKING GUN of Building 7. The controlled demo narrative for Building 7 is a distraction, same goes for the fire induced collapse. There is a REASON why Richard Gage and architects for an engineered truth NEVER play videos of Building 7 with sound. Because there was NO EXPLOSIONS during the fall, pointing to a conventional controlled demolition. They are deceiving you and have for nearly 20 years! DeMentri won several awards for his reporting for WCBS and WCAU, including seven Emmys for investigative reporting, and a national Edward R. Murrow Award for his reporting on the September 11, 2001

Today is Story Saturday - Building 7 "Raw Footage" This Building 7 video compilation of the coverage on September 11, by Vince DeMentri with a special focus on Building 7. Raw behind the scenes and what was broadcast on air. NOTICE: - You can hear vehicles exploding in the background (how does buildings disintegrating, cause vehicles to spontaneously combust, blocks away). - You hear a weird buzzing, some sort of static interference in the audio. - You see his report on the blown up vehicles, limited fires in the building. He DOES NOT report on massive explosions going off in the building. By late afternoon, Building 7 goes down SILENTLY. Thus proving to you Building 7 WAS NOT a conventional controlled demolition. One fact that you won't hear from Richard Gage and architects for an engineered truth, is the anomaly with the seismic reading recorded for the 230 000 ton Building 7. There was no P or S wave, as one would expect for 230 000 tons slamming to the ground! Only surface waves were recorded, as if the weight was lifted off the ground. The seismic reading for Building 7 IS THE SMOKING GUN of Building 7. The controlled demo narrative for Building 7 is a distraction, same goes for the fire induced collapse. There is a REASON why Richard Gage and architects for an engineered truth NEVER play videos of Building 7 with sound. Because there was NO EXPLOSIONS during the fall, pointing to a conventional controlled demolition. They are deceiving you and have for nearly 20 years! DeMentri won several awards for his reporting for WCBS and WCAU, including seven Emmys for investigative reporting, and a national Edward R. Murrow Award for his reporting on the September 11, 2001

9/11 Revisited

21,397 views • 11 months ago

#9 – Senator Ron Johnson says Building 7 “sure looks like CONTROLLED DEMOLITION to me.” The official story about Building 7 states that it collapsed due to “office fires.” But when you dig your nose in “conspiracy land,” you learn that hundreds of architects, engineers, and even eyewitnesses argue it looked and sounded like a classic controlled demolition. Johnson told James Corbett that asking legitimate questions results in instant backlash, which he said “just raises my suspicion level.” “The Richard Gages of the world, the structural engineers, the firefighters who know the history of these steel buildings not coming down because of basic fires—you need SOMETHING ELSE,” Johnson declared. “You see the video and you go, ‘sure looks like controlled demolition to me.’” Johnson wants to know why we can’t even ask such questions about 9/11. His conclusion is that “people don’t want to know the answer.”

#9 – Senator Ron Johnson says Building 7 “sure looks like CONTROLLED DEMOLITION to me.” The official story about Building 7 states that it collapsed due to “office fires.” But when you dig your nose in “conspiracy land,” you learn that hundreds of architects, engineers, and even eyewitnesses argue it looked and sounded like a classic controlled demolition. Johnson told James Corbett that asking legitimate questions results in instant backlash, which he said “just raises my suspicion level.” “The Richard Gages of the world, the structural engineers, the firefighters who know the history of these steel buildings not coming down because of basic fires—you need SOMETHING ELSE,” Johnson declared. “You see the video and you go, ‘sure looks like controlled demolition to me.’” Johnson wants to know why we can’t even ask such questions about 9/11. His conclusion is that “people don’t want to know the answer.”

Vigilant Fox 🦊

32,756 views • 10 months ago

What really brought down the Twin Towers and Building 7 on 9/11? 🏙️ Our guest, Senator Ron Johnson wants new hearings. At Redacted, we’ve said it before, you’d have to prove it wasn’t a controlled demolition.

What really brought down the Twin Towers and Building 7 on 9/11? 🏙️ Our guest, Senator Ron Johnson wants new hearings. At Redacted, we’ve said it before, you’d have to prove it wasn’t a controlled demolition.

Redacted

29,557 views • 1 year ago

[RG911Team] Can you explain this? The tallest building to be officially demolished with explosives was Meena Plaza in Abu Dhabi, at 553 feet tall. But WTC Building 7, which was 610 feet tall, came down in 7 seconds on 9/11. They say office fires took it down. But how could fire accomplish a greater feat than the world’s best demolition experts?

[RG911Team] Can you explain this? The tallest building to be officially demolished with explosives was Meena Plaza in Abu Dhabi, at 553 feet tall. But WTC Building 7, which was 610 feet tall, came down in 7 seconds on 9/11. They say office fires took it down. But how could fire accomplish a greater feat than the world’s best demolition experts?

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

58,709 views • 1 year ago

Controlled Demolition? BBC Pre-Knowledge? Ron Johnson Says It’s Time to Reopen 9/11 It took over two decades—but someone in D.C. is finally asking the right questions. Senator Ron Johnson is calling for a full investigation into everything we weren’t allowed to question: “Why did they just get rid of all the debris from 9/11? Totally contrary to any type of firefighting investigation.” “Why suppress reports? Why discredit witnesses who heard explosions?” He’s doing what no one else in Congress dares to do: - Reexamining Building 7: “That sure looks like controlled demolition to me.” - Calling out NIST: “They won’t release their own calculations.” - Exposing media collusion: “The BBC reported Building 7 collapsed—before it actually did.” They’ve weaponized the “conspiracy theory” label for decades. Johnson isn’t afraid of it.

Controlled Demolition? BBC Pre-Knowledge? Ron Johnson Says It’s Time to Reopen 9/11 It took over two decades—but someone in D.C. is finally asking the right questions. Senator Ron Johnson is calling for a full investigation into everything we weren’t allowed to question: “Why did they just get rid of all the debris from 9/11? Totally contrary to any type of firefighting investigation.” “Why suppress reports? Why discredit witnesses who heard explosions?” He’s doing what no one else in Congress dares to do: - Reexamining Building 7: “That sure looks like controlled demolition to me.” - Calling out NIST: “They won’t release their own calculations.” - Exposing media collusion: “The BBC reported Building 7 collapsed—before it actually did.” They’ve weaponized the “conspiracy theory” label for decades. Johnson isn’t afraid of it.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

54,866 views • 1 year ago

Trump: They don't want any more windows. No more windows. They want to take down every building and build a building with no windows in it. I've always been known for having the biggest windows. I got, I want those windows to be so big right down to the bottom of the floor. I got to change my whole philosophy if you don't vote me in because I go back to building crazy buildings now and I won't be able to use windows anymore. No, they actually, they don't want windows, they don't want cows (???)

Trump: They don't want any more windows. No more windows. They want to take down every building and build a building with no windows in it. I've always been known for having the biggest windows. I got, I want those windows to be so big right down to the bottom of the floor. I got to change my whole philosophy if you don't vote me in because I go back to building crazy buildings now and I won't be able to use windows anymore. No, they actually, they don't want windows, they don't want cows (???)

Headquarters

1,972,647 views • 1 year ago

Businesses in Mombasa have been at a standstill for the better part of Wednesday as military personnel took control of the area surrounding a nine-storey building along Abdel Nasser Road, which is set for controlled demolition. A 1.2km buffer zone has been set up around the building as authorities finalize preparations for its demolition. The building was declared structurally unsound after a partial collapse last week, which raised immediate safety issues for nearby residents and surrounding structures. In response, all residents have been evacuated, with precautionary measures in place to ensure their safety. Patients from Coast General Teaching & Referral Hospital have also been advised to seek medical services in alternative hospitals during the affected period to avoid any risks associated with the operation. The public has been urged to stay clear of the vicinity for the next eight hours, as the demolition is carried out. Emergency services, including ambulances and fire trucks, are on standby to handle any unforeseen events during the controlled explosion. The collapse is believed to have been caused by the addition of extra floors, which added more weight than the foundation could support. The drilling of a borehole near the building led to the floor columns sinking by three meters and further compromised the structure's integrity. As a result, the decision was made to bring the building down using controlled explosions.

Businesses in Mombasa have been at a standstill for the better part of Wednesday as military personnel took control of the area surrounding a nine-storey building along Abdel Nasser Road, which is set for controlled demolition. A 1.2km buffer zone has been set up around the building as authorities finalize preparations for its demolition. The building was declared structurally unsound after a partial collapse last week, which raised immediate safety issues for nearby residents and surrounding structures. In response, all residents have been evacuated, with precautionary measures in place to ensure their safety. Patients from Coast General Teaching & Referral Hospital have also been advised to seek medical services in alternative hospitals during the affected period to avoid any risks associated with the operation. The public has been urged to stay clear of the vicinity for the next eight hours, as the demolition is carried out. Emergency services, including ambulances and fire trucks, are on standby to handle any unforeseen events during the controlled explosion. The collapse is believed to have been caused by the addition of extra floors, which added more weight than the foundation could support. The drilling of a borehole near the building led to the floor columns sinking by three meters and further compromised the structure's integrity. As a result, the decision was made to bring the building down using controlled explosions.

Cyprian, Is Nyakundi

68,833 views • 1 year ago

Uh oh…. 👀 🚨 Senator Ron Johnson says it looks to him like Tower 7 was taken down via Controlled Demolition He describes when it all went down, the only thing you had at the time was the MSM and he bought it hook, line, and sinker. He says he never even heard about Tower 7 until many years later: “Most Americans didn’t even know another tower collapsed that day.. because the entire focus was on the Twin Towers — then you have a BBC reporter talking about it collapsing and it’s still standing over her left shoulder. And if you look at it, it sure looks like a controlled demolition. Experts say it looks like a controlled demolition.” Clip Full Interview

Uh oh…. 👀 🚨 Senator Ron Johnson says it looks to him like Tower 7 was taken down via Controlled Demolition He describes when it all went down, the only thing you had at the time was the MSM and he bought it hook, line, and sinker. He says he never even heard about Tower 7 until many years later: “Most Americans didn’t even know another tower collapsed that day.. because the entire focus was on the Twin Towers — then you have a BBC reporter talking about it collapsing and it’s still standing over her left shoulder. And if you look at it, it sure looks like a controlled demolition. Experts say it looks like a controlled demolition.” Clip Full Interview

MJTruthUltra

270,186 views • 7 months ago

[RG911Team] A Miami hotel just got taken down via controlled demolition, but… Why didn’t they just set a few fires and save a ton of money? According to the official 9/11 story, that’s what brought WTC7 down into its footprint. Or perhaps we were lied to about 9/11…

[RG911Team] A Miami hotel just got taken down via controlled demolition, but… Why didn’t they just set a few fires and save a ton of money? According to the official 9/11 story, that’s what brought WTC7 down into its footprint. Or perhaps we were lied to about 9/11…

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

12,578 views • 3 months ago

“You can only demolish the mosque after you have killed me. Without that, you won’t be able to touch it. They gave us no prior notice. Which right do you have to demolish a mosque?” — A Deputy Chief Imam has condemned the demolition exercise at East Legon American House, questioning the lack of prior notice and appealing for fairness, dialogue, and respect for the mosque as a place of worship. 🎥: Urban News

“You can only demolish the mosque after you have killed me. Without that, you won’t be able to touch it. They gave us no prior notice. Which right do you have to demolish a mosque?” — A Deputy Chief Imam has condemned the demolition exercise at East Legon American House, questioning the lack of prior notice and appealing for fairness, dialogue, and respect for the mosque as a place of worship. 🎥: Urban News

𝐀𝐒𝐊

49,680 views • 9 days ago

If Iran doesn’t want to play ball, they will be tenderized into compliance. The way you tenderize is you have highly specific ordinance, satellite-controlled, AI-driven, predictive analysis on everything you need, controlled stateside from a server in the US on sovereign soil, and you tenderize every day. You don't have to kill a lot of people. You don't wanna do that. This is going to be a new type of warfare. This is called tenderization. And why can you do that? Because you have superior air defense control through AI. That's what we need in America. That's what I'm building, and that's what every other developer's gonna have to build.

If Iran doesn’t want to play ball, they will be tenderized into compliance. The way you tenderize is you have highly specific ordinance, satellite-controlled, AI-driven, predictive analysis on everything you need, controlled stateside from a server in the US on sovereign soil, and you tenderize every day. You don't have to kill a lot of people. You don't wanna do that. This is going to be a new type of warfare. This is called tenderization. And why can you do that? Because you have superior air defense control through AI. That's what we need in America. That's what I'm building, and that's what every other developer's gonna have to build.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

92,462 views • 5 days ago

Senator Ron Johnson just dropped a major hint that 9/11 may have been an inside job—specifically pointing to Building 7 as a likely controlled demolition. He’s demanding answers on who ordered the removal of critical evidence and what they were trying to hide. Johnson vows to go public with everything he uncovers and is calling on the FBI to release the full, unredacted 9/11 files.

Senator Ron Johnson just dropped a major hint that 9/11 may have been an inside job—specifically pointing to Building 7 as a likely controlled demolition. He’s demanding answers on who ordered the removal of critical evidence and what they were trying to hide. Johnson vows to go public with everything he uncovers and is calling on the FBI to release the full, unredacted 9/11 files.

Shadow of Ezra

113,255 views • 1 year ago

🇺🇸 JOE ROGAN: BUILDING 7'S COLLAPSE DOESN'T MAKE SENSE "Donald Rumsfeld gives this press conference and says there are trillions of dollars they can't account for. The very next day, 9/11 happens. And in one of the buildings where they store data, that building mysteriously implodes like a controlled demolition—like no building has ever collapsed just because of fire." Source: Joe Rogan, Ian Carroll

🇺🇸 JOE ROGAN: BUILDING 7'S COLLAPSE DOESN'T MAKE SENSE "Donald Rumsfeld gives this press conference and says there are trillions of dollars they can't account for. The very next day, 9/11 happens. And in one of the buildings where they store data, that building mysteriously implodes like a controlled demolition—like no building has ever collapsed just because of fire." Source: Joe Rogan, Ian Carroll

Mario Nawfal

215,887 views • 1 year ago

Senator Ron Johnson: "I'd never even heard of Building 7. Twenty years later, I had never heard of Building 7. And all of a sudden you see the video and you go, 'Sure, looks like controlled demolition to me.'... so why can't [we] even ask these questions?" This clip of sitting Senator from Wisconsin Ron Johnson (Senator Ron Johnson) is taken from an interview with James Corbett posted to The Official Corbett Report Rumble channel on September 7, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "I'm just asking these very legitimate questions. Why can't we do that? Which of course just raises my suspicion level. So that's, that's pretty well the, you know, you're the expert in this. I mean the Richard Gages of the world, the structural engineers, the firefighters who, who know the history of, you know, these steel buildings not coming down because basically fires. You need something else. "The first time I'd never even heard of Building 7. Twenty years later I had never heard of Building 7. And all of a sudden you see the video and you go, sure, looks like controlled demolition to me. "And then you start watching the documentaries and you hear about the structural engineering professor, up in Alaska doing a four year study on that completely refutes what NIST, study, hear about the 9/11 Commission. Again, I can just go on and on. I'm not an expert on this. I've just heard all the questions, and they sound completely legitimate to me. "And so you ask yourself the question, so why can't even ask these questions? I think an interesting component of this is because people don't want to know the answer. I mean, it opens up, which I can, completely understand from the position of the President of the United States, our relationship with foreign— I can certainly understand why, if the truth were ever known, we may want to just slam that Pandora's box closed. So that's kind of the position we're in right now. "I think the questions are legitimate. They've been raised. People don't want the answers. A lot of people do, but a lot of people don't."

Senator Ron Johnson: "I'd never even heard of Building 7. Twenty years later, I had never heard of Building 7. And all of a sudden you see the video and you go, 'Sure, looks like controlled demolition to me.'... so why can't [we] even ask these questions?" This clip of sitting Senator from Wisconsin Ron Johnson (Senator Ron Johnson) is taken from an interview with James Corbett posted to The Official Corbett Report Rumble channel on September 7, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "I'm just asking these very legitimate questions. Why can't we do that? Which of course just raises my suspicion level. So that's, that's pretty well the, you know, you're the expert in this. I mean the Richard Gages of the world, the structural engineers, the firefighters who, who know the history of, you know, these steel buildings not coming down because basically fires. You need something else. "The first time I'd never even heard of Building 7. Twenty years later I had never heard of Building 7. And all of a sudden you see the video and you go, sure, looks like controlled demolition to me. "And then you start watching the documentaries and you hear about the structural engineering professor, up in Alaska doing a four year study on that completely refutes what NIST, study, hear about the 9/11 Commission. Again, I can just go on and on. I'm not an expert on this. I've just heard all the questions, and they sound completely legitimate to me. "And so you ask yourself the question, so why can't even ask these questions? I think an interesting component of this is because people don't want to know the answer. I mean, it opens up, which I can, completely understand from the position of the President of the United States, our relationship with foreign— I can certainly understand why, if the truth were ever known, we may want to just slam that Pandora's box closed. So that's kind of the position we're in right now. "I think the questions are legitimate. They've been raised. People don't want the answers. A lot of people do, but a lot of people don't."

Sense Receptor

35,572 views • 10 months ago