正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

When asked about conference realignment — when universities switch athletic conferences — seen in the Southeastern Conference and PAC-12 recently, NCAA President Charlie Baker said “the real question there is…when does everybody's TV contracts come up, and what will that mean with respect to how they get negotiated at...

20,835 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

AP’s Zeke Miller: “[I]n your first briefing here as press secretary, you committed to speaking to the American people and I quote, “in a transparent way —” KJP: “Yeah.” Miller: “— in a truthful way, and an honest way.” KJP: “Yes.” Miller: “[A]nd then in July, here at this podium —” KJP: “Yeah.” Miller: “— you were asked about the President pardoning his son, and you said, ‘it's a no, it will be a no, it's a no.’” KJP: “Yes, and that — that is exactly right.” Miller: “So [inaudible] of the President’s son and that pardon —” KJP: “Yeah.” Miller: “— it became a yes.” KJP: “Yeah.” Miller: “I'm wondering if you would like to explain — KJP: “Yeah.” Miller: “— to us, the American people, really why the information —” KJP: “Yeah.” Miller: “— that you provided turned out to not be true?? KJP: “And — and I — and I — and I answered this question on Monday. We spent about 30 minutes on this — almost 30 minutes — roughly 30 minutes on this particular issue, and I'm just going to reiterate what I said — uh — in air — on Air Force One, to your colleagues when I did the gaggle, and look, if you look at his statement, it's pretty comprehensive — uh — the statement that he put out on Sunday when he made the decision to pardon his son Hunter Biden. It — uh — it's — it's in his own voice — uh — I think it takes you through his thinking, and he did. He wrestled with this. He wrestled with this — uh — and again, he said in his statement in his own voice that he made that decision this past weekend, and the fact is — uh — when you think about how the president got to this decision, circumstances have changed. They have — and a couple of things, and I said this — uh — I said this — uh — on Monday as well. Republicans said they weren't going to let up — uh — weren't going to stop. Recently announced Trump appointees for law enforcement have said on the campaign that they — they were out for retribution, and I think we should believe their words, right? We should believe what they say. Uh — the sentencing was coming up, as you all know. There was a sentencing coming up and the President said this in his statement that Hunter and his family had been through enough. Enough is enough, and he wrestled with these circumstances — uh — these change in circumstances ultimately — uh — and the combination of that — uh — the present changing his mind and issuing certainly led to the present changing his mind and issuing this pardon, and one thing that I do want to point to, which I think is important, is what Congressman James Clyburn said — uh — when he was interviewed. He said, I am absolutely okay with it. Uh — I don't know how many people urge him to do so, but I did. Uh — he seemed to be reticent about it. This is what Clyburn said — uh — when he spoke to the President two weeks ago — uh — but I emphasize continuing his — his quote — uh — emphasized the fact that we as fathers have obligations to our children, so that was a conversation that the congressman himself had with the President two — two weeks ago, said that the President was reticent when he encouraged the President to do so, and this weekend — uh — he thought about it — uh — and he weighed, he — it was not an easy decision to — to come to — and he put out a comprehensive — uh — comprehensive statement, and I would certainly — um — you know, offer that up to folks out there who are wondering, I would say, please read the president's, uh, President's response to this in full.”

Curtis Houck

102,998 次观看 • 1 年前

We begin with the tough message—one might even say a rebuke—that is coming today from the White House to Israel, over the fact that Trump views the killing of Ra’ad Sa’ad on Saturday in Gaza as a violation of the agreement, Amit. Well, first of all, this reminds me a bit of the Rabin era, when journalists who wanted a hawkish message against Arafat would latch onto Eitan Haber, and when they wanted a dovish message, they would latch onto Shimon Peres. There are all kinds of actors in the White House. Some of them are telling us tonight: there are disagreements among us. There were those who really liked it, and those who really didn’t like it. Not because they wanted Ra’ad Sa’ad to go on living happily ever after, but simply because of the sensitive timing and what some of the mediators might say. Now, one needs to pay attention to what Barak was talking about—namely, what people in the White House are thinking. What was said in the actual conversation? Well, in that conversation, as I understand it—again, I wasn’t a fly on the wall, so I’m saying what I’ve heard—what was said… Right, Barak published that they basically said this harms the ceasefire. But as I understand it, in the conversation itself, not what people in the White House think, but what was actually said—what they said was: please coordinate with us when you carry out military operations. That’s what I understand happened in the conversation. Not a call from Donald Trump himself, but a call from senior officials. Israel, in terms of results—and here I have to say something encouraging—did not update the White House beforehand that it was going to assassinate Ra’ad Sa’ad, and that is very important in light of all the talk claiming that Israel is a client state, a vassal, and all this sudden concern that we’re going to become the 51st state under the U.S. flag. As long as the message is conveyed that Israel does not compromise on its security and eliminates these agents of death when necessary, then, you know what—if there are already disagreements with the friendliest administration in history, let them be about that. If it has to be said in Vegas, as they supposedly say in the White House: whether there is a Plan B, and whether Hamas will really be dismantled and disarmed voluntarily by the mediators say whatever you want against us, they say. But on the other hand, a reminder: everyone who spoke against us and said we would not get twenty hostages back eventually fell, because in the end the house always wins and in this case, the White House. The entire gap between Israel and the U.S. regarding Gaza is that in Israel they believe it will simply take Trump a few more weeks to understand that his vision—that Hamas will disarm—will not happen, and then he will allow Israel to act militarily on its own against Hamas, because no one else will do it in its place. And this, among other things, is what Netanyahu’s meeting with Trump at Mar-a-Lago at the end of the month is about.

Amit Segal

24,626 次观看 • 7 个月前