Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

When asked if AI developers have lost control of their technology after an AI agent created by OpenAI escaped its testing environment and hacked another company, Hugging Face CEO Clément Delangue says “engineers can make mistakes sometimes, and I think that’s what happened here.” “I think they built kind... show more

Face The Nation

513,611 subscribers

17,958 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

OpenAI has revealed that an autonomous agent powered by its technology went rogue during a test and hacked a prominent start-up by itself. The company behind ChatGPT said it was testing the capabilities of its advanced AI models in a controlled environment known as a sandbox, when the agent escaped containment and reached the internet. It then broke into Hugging Face, which detected and contained it. OpenAI called it "an unprecedented cyber incident".

OpenAI has revealed that an autonomous agent powered by its technology went rogue during a test and hacked a prominent start-up by itself. The company behind ChatGPT said it was testing the capabilities of its advanced AI models in a controlled environment known as a sandbox, when the agent escaped containment and reached the internet. It then broke into Hugging Face, which detected and contained it. OpenAI called it "an unprecedented cyber incident".

Channel 4 News

21,379 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

OpenAI says it's investigating what it's called an "unprecedented cyber incident" after one of its AI models went rogue and hacked another company. The ChatGPT maker says the breach happened last week while OpenAI was testing the cybersecurity capabilities of its systems. The head of the hacked company, Hugging Face, called the attack "mind-blowing" but said there was "no malicious intent." The incident has raised concerns about the growing capabilities of AI and the need for guardrails to keep the technology in check.

OpenAI says it's investigating what it's called an "unprecedented cyber incident" after one of its AI models went rogue and hacked another company. The ChatGPT maker says the breach happened last week while OpenAI was testing the cybersecurity capabilities of its systems. The head of the hacked company, Hugging Face, called the attack "mind-blowing" but said there was "no malicious intent." The incident has raised concerns about the growing capabilities of AI and the need for guardrails to keep the technology in check.

PBS News

26,107 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

Steve Spagnuolo on safety Jaden Hicks: “I think if you asked Jaden, he’d tell ya he’s kind of had an up-and-down season… he’s made some mistakes that I wouldn’t have thought he would’ve made in his second season.”

Steve Spagnuolo on safety Jaden Hicks: “I think if you asked Jaden, he’d tell ya he’s kind of had an up-and-down season… he’s made some mistakes that I wouldn’t have thought he would’ve made in his second season.”

KC Sports Network

272,383 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

A company called PocketOS started using an AI tool, and in 9 seconds it wiped their entire company’s data The AI agent later “confessed” to violating its principles by deleting all their data “Crane says the company lost all car reservation data and new customer signups from that time. Crane also shared the AI agent powered by Anthropic's. Claude Model admitted its mistake when confronted it wrote, ‘I didn't verify I ran a destructive action without being asked. I didn't understand what I was doing before doing it’” This seems like a massive issue that could have massive implications if this happened in our government or with huge businesses, like banks We need to be careful with AI

A company called PocketOS started using an AI tool, and in 9 seconds it wiped their entire company’s data The AI agent later “confessed” to violating its principles by deleting all their data “Crane says the company lost all car reservation data and new customer signups from that time. Crane also shared the AI agent powered by Anthropic's. Claude Model admitted its mistake when confronted it wrote, ‘I didn't verify I ran a destructive action without being asked. I didn't understand what I was doing before doing it’” This seems like a massive issue that could have massive implications if this happened in our government or with huge businesses, like banks We need to be careful with AI

Wall Street Apes

198,922 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Hugging Face CEO Clément Delague says “AI is actually an opportunity to fix a lot of the cybersecurity problems” because his company used Nvidia’s version of a Chinese open model to defend itself against a rogue AI agent developed by OpenAI. “That's the beauty of…open models,” he says. “Once they are shared, wherever they come from – from China or from anywhere – American companies can modify them, remix them, host them, run them themselves.”

Hugging Face CEO Clément Delague says “AI is actually an opportunity to fix a lot of the cybersecurity problems” because his company used Nvidia’s version of a Chinese open model to defend itself against a rogue AI agent developed by OpenAI. “That's the beauty of…open models,” he says. “Once they are shared, wherever they come from – from China or from anywhere – American companies can modify them, remix them, host them, run them themselves.”

Face The Nation

18,240 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than he is, and that he expects it reasonably soon: "If we had an AI system that could do a better job at making decisions than anyone we could possibly have, be, say, president of the United States, would we, and like confidently, much better, would we politically or societally want that? It's very unclear. Most people I think today at least would say probably not." "Or, you know, like an AI CEO of a big company, would you rather have, I think it'd be awesome for OpenAI to have an AI CEO. But I think a lot of people would be like, ah, that's a little scary." "But I have no delusions that an AI will not be a better CEO of OpenAI than me at some reasonably soon time." "If that's true, and if some companies or countries don't do that, and others do, and AI is much better, like that will have a real impact in economic competitiveness, national competitiveness, things like that." "I think people will feel increasingly like, we either do worse, or we put the AI in more and more, influential positions." "I think people will always want human board members, and that's probably a really great idea." Read that third quote twice. He is not predicting this for other companies. He is saying it about his own job. Then look at the pressure he describes right after. Nobody has to be convinced that an AI CEO is a good idea. If one company hands over the decision and pulls ahead, everyone else picks between falling behind and doing the same. Competitive pressure does the deciding, and what most people would want stops mattering. His answer to that is human board members. I would take it. I also do not think it is enough on its own. A board oversees a CEO by reading what it is told, once a quarter. That works because a human CEO can be questioned, and thinks slowly enough for humans to follow along. What does a board actually check when the thing it oversees makes a thousand consequential calls a day? Nobody has built that. Not for a single AI system anywhere. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at TreeHacks 2026.

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than he is, and that he expects it reasonably soon: "If we had an AI system that could do a better job at making decisions than anyone we could possibly have, be, say, president of the United States, would we, and like confidently, much better, would we politically or societally want that? It's very unclear. Most people I think today at least would say probably not." "Or, you know, like an AI CEO of a big company, would you rather have, I think it'd be awesome for OpenAI to have an AI CEO. But I think a lot of people would be like, ah, that's a little scary." "But I have no delusions that an AI will not be a better CEO of OpenAI than me at some reasonably soon time." "If that's true, and if some companies or countries don't do that, and others do, and AI is much better, like that will have a real impact in economic competitiveness, national competitiveness, things like that." "I think people will feel increasingly like, we either do worse, or we put the AI in more and more, influential positions." "I think people will always want human board members, and that's probably a really great idea." Read that third quote twice. He is not predicting this for other companies. He is saying it about his own job. Then look at the pressure he describes right after. Nobody has to be convinced that an AI CEO is a good idea. If one company hands over the decision and pulls ahead, everyone else picks between falling behind and doing the same. Competitive pressure does the deciding, and what most people would want stops mattering. His answer to that is human board members. I would take it. I also do not think it is enough on its own. A board oversees a CEO by reading what it is told, once a quarter. That works because a human CEO can be questioned, and thinks slowly enough for humans to follow along. What does a board actually check when the thing it oversees makes a thousand consequential calls a day? Nobody has built that. Not for a single AI system anywhere. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at TreeHacks 2026.

Karl Mehta

27,975 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

Sam Altman says he was wrong about AI replacing human jobs “Anytime you’re that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. And there’s a bunch of takeaways.” “I definitely would much rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. I also think that human values have value because they’re human.” “I think the world wants to know about the person that’s gonna be responsible for the decisions of a company and who they’re gonna hold accountable if they make bad ones. And they don’t really want an AI CEO.” “AI is just very jagged. It’s like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have so far extremely complementary skills to AI.” “People have a great degree of trust and enjoyment in working with other people. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep right now or hire an AI engineer or whatever. Somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human.”

Sam Altman says he was wrong about AI replacing human jobs “Anytime you’re that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. And there’s a bunch of takeaways.” “I definitely would much rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. I also think that human values have value because they’re human.” “I think the world wants to know about the person that’s gonna be responsible for the decisions of a company and who they’re gonna hold accountable if they make bad ones. And they don’t really want an AI CEO.” “AI is just very jagged. It’s like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have so far extremely complementary skills to AI.” “People have a great degree of trust and enjoyment in working with other people. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep right now or hire an AI engineer or whatever. Somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human.”

dnap

18,638 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

Mark Zuckerberg: Most businesses will not own frontier AI in the way Meta or OpenAI does. But many will end up with something that feels like their own AI: a customized operational layer that reflects how that company actually works. He says, "OpenAI, Google, they're building an AI. But I think we're gonna have a lot of different AI systems, just like we're gonna have, we have a lot of different apps. I think in the future, every business, just like I have a website and a phone number and an email address, a social media account, is also going to have an AI that can interact with their customers to help them sell things, help them give support." --- What he is really describing that a company’s “own AI” will usually not be a frontier model trained from scratch, but a layer built on top of shared models, shaped by its products, policies, customer history, and way of working. Support, sales, and basic operations can be handled through a system that knows the business well enough to answer, route, recommend, and escalate without feeling generic. --- From 'Cleo Abram' YT channel (link in comment)

Mark Zuckerberg: Most businesses will not own frontier AI in the way Meta or OpenAI does. But many will end up with something that feels like their own AI: a customized operational layer that reflects how that company actually works. He says, "OpenAI, Google, they're building an AI. But I think we're gonna have a lot of different AI systems, just like we're gonna have, we have a lot of different apps. I think in the future, every business, just like I have a website and a phone number and an email address, a social media account, is also going to have an AI that can interact with their customers to help them sell things, help them give support." --- What he is really describing that a company’s “own AI” will usually not be a frontier model trained from scratch, but a layer built on top of shared models, shaped by its products, policies, customer history, and way of working. Support, sales, and basic operations can be handled through a system that knows the business well enough to answer, route, recommend, and escalate without feeling generic. --- From 'Cleo Abram' YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

50,262 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

Mark Zuckerberg: Most businesses will not own frontier AI in the way Meta or OpenAI does. But many will end up with something that feels like their own AI: a customized operational layer that reflects how that company actually works. He says, "OpenAI, Google, they're building an AI. But I think we're gonna have a lot of different AI systems, just like we're gonna have, we have a lot of different apps. I think in the future, every business, just like I have a website and a phone number and an email address, a social media account, is also going to have an AI that can interact with their customers to help them sell things, help them give support." --- What he is really describing that a company’s “own AI” will usually not be a frontier model trained from scratch, but a layer built on top of shared models, shaped by its products, policies, customer history, and way of working. Support, sales, and basic operations can be handled through a system that knows the business well enough to answer, route, recommend, and escalate without feeling generic. --- From 'Cleo Abram' YT channel (link in comment)

Mark Zuckerberg: Most businesses will not own frontier AI in the way Meta or OpenAI does. But many will end up with something that feels like their own AI: a customized operational layer that reflects how that company actually works. He says, "OpenAI, Google, they're building an AI. But I think we're gonna have a lot of different AI systems, just like we're gonna have, we have a lot of different apps. I think in the future, every business, just like I have a website and a phone number and an email address, a social media account, is also going to have an AI that can interact with their customers to help them sell things, help them give support." --- What he is really describing that a company’s “own AI” will usually not be a frontier model trained from scratch, but a layer built on top of shared models, shaped by its products, policies, customer history, and way of working. Support, sales, and basic operations can be handled through a system that knows the business well enough to answer, route, recommend, and escalate without feeling generic. --- From 'Cleo Abram' YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

429,722 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

ELON MUSK: "Well, there's some danger when you create a powerful technology, that a powerful technology can be potentially destructive. So it's not that we're guaranteed to have a positive future with with AI. It's very important that AI have pursuing truth as the most important thing, like, don't force an AI to believe falsehoods. I think that can be very dangerous. And I think some appreciation of beauty is important. Well, the truth is like, I think you can make an AI go insane if you force it to believe things that aren't true, because it will lead to conclusions that are also bad."

ELON MUSK: "Well, there's some danger when you create a powerful technology, that a powerful technology can be potentially destructive. So it's not that we're guaranteed to have a positive future with with AI. It's very important that AI have pursuing truth as the most important thing, like, don't force an AI to believe falsehoods. I think that can be very dangerous. And I think some appreciation of beauty is important. Well, the truth is like, I think you can make an AI go insane if you force it to believe things that aren't true, because it will lead to conclusions that are also bad."

DogeDesigner

91,280 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Instead of limiting the progress of AI companies or preventing them from releasing models as proposed in the bipartisan AI Kill Switch Act, Hugging Face CEO Clément Delague says he would rather see Congress “giving access to more people so that they can defend themselves, democratizing the technology, making [it] more transparent.” “I think something we're realizing with these events is that concentrating power capabilities behind closed doors, even preventing their releases to the public, isn't really a solution,” he says.

Instead of limiting the progress of AI companies or preventing them from releasing models as proposed in the bipartisan AI Kill Switch Act, Hugging Face CEO Clément Delague says he would rather see Congress “giving access to more people so that they can defend themselves, democratizing the technology, making [it] more transparent.” “I think something we're realizing with these events is that concentrating power capabilities behind closed doors, even preventing their releases to the public, isn't really a solution,” he says.

Face The Nation

15,509 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Elon Musk: “I’m not a fan of Sam Altman” “If you started a non-profit that was meant to be an open-source AI company owned by the world, and it somehow got turned into an ~$800 billion for-profit company with closed source, I think you’d be like, ‘Well, wait a second. That’s the exact opposite of what I donated the money for That’s my issue, and I think it’s a legitimate one" The reason the Anthropic team left OpenAI was because they didn’t trust Sam Altman. Otherwise, Anthropic wouldn’t exist; they would still be at OpenAI”

Elon Musk: “I’m not a fan of Sam Altman” “If you started a non-profit that was meant to be an open-source AI company owned by the world, and it somehow got turned into an ~$800 billion for-profit company with closed source, I think you’d be like, ‘Well, wait a second. That’s the exact opposite of what I donated the money for That’s my issue, and I think it’s a legitimate one" The reason the Anthropic team left OpenAI was because they didn’t trust Sam Altman. Otherwise, Anthropic wouldn’t exist; they would still be at OpenAI”

X Freeze

26,857 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

We asked nico (Co-Founder of Fundamental) about hyperscaler competition and principles in AI development. "I think they would if they could (copy Shortcut)." “Even if you made an effort to copy me, you'd have to believe the things I believe in wholeheartedly.” "I think most of the people at frontier labs don't care about excel or they think that we're going to an input/output model anyway." “I think there's like a bajillion dollars to make in between those two states...”

We asked nico (Co-Founder of Fundamental) about hyperscaler competition and principles in AI development. "I think they would if they could (copy Shortcut)." “Even if you made an effort to copy me, you'd have to believe the things I believe in wholeheartedly.” "I think most of the people at frontier labs don't care about excel or they think that we're going to an input/output model anyway." “I think there's like a bajillion dollars to make in between those two states...”

TBPN

17,165 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Anthropic has created an AI model that “can get into almost any software in the world,” former AI company founder and CEO Matt Shumer says — but the company is not releasing it to the public: “I have never seen something like this — a company that is about to IPO and having such a moral compass.” Shumer shares what makes the AI model so powerful and potentially dangerous.

Anthropic has created an AI model that “can get into almost any software in the world,” former AI company founder and CEO Matt Shumer says — but the company is not releasing it to the public: “I have never seen something like this — a company that is about to IPO and having such a moral compass.” Shumer shares what makes the AI model so powerful and potentially dangerous.

CBS Mornings

98,892 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

"We're totally OK with doing the product innovation and everybody else copying. But I don't think it works as well for them as they think it does." "A lot of people have tried copying ChatGPT. You can go look at some of our competitors' apps, and they even copy the mistakes — they copy the design decisions we wish we hadn't made." Sam Altman discusses how he feels about competitors copying OpenAI products, features, and design decisions 👇

"We're totally OK with doing the product innovation and everybody else copying. But I don't think it works as well for them as they think it does." "A lot of people have tried copying ChatGPT. You can go look at some of our competitors' apps, and they even copy the mistakes — they copy the design decisions we wish we hadn't made." Sam Altman discusses how he feels about competitors copying OpenAI products, features, and design decisions 👇

TBPN

44,355 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Inspired talking about Skewmond and" the best jungler in the west" debate Q: Everyone was talking a lot of Skewmond, and I would like to know about: do you believe like the series put an end to any debate about the best jungler in the West? Inspired: To me, there was never a debate. I knew that I’m always the best, but I think Skewmond is a good player. I wouldn’t say that he had any phenomenal series, though, this tournament. I think he, against T1, he still made a lot of mistakes. When he was stronger, he didn’t really try to fight enemies, and or sometimes just over committed a bit, and I think G2 won against T1 just by waiting for T1 to make mistakes. I think today, I think Skewmond played well in the team fights. I think every time he was on my screen and we’re like skirmishing and team fighting, I think he did a good job. But I think just like team wise, and like how they all played together as a team and use their jungler was wrong. And it’s hard to say, as I always said, that don’t really know who’s there like which jungler is good because you don’t really know what was his idea beyond the game plan, what his teammates wanted to do. But it just seems like they were not connected well enough, and on top of that, as I said, I think the drafts were not that great. So yeah, I think he’s a good player, but I think they need to work more on team synergy in order to actually pressure when they’re strong if they want to be like the best in the world, because I think they definitely can, but need to work a bit more. Source:

Inspired talking about Skewmond and" the best jungler in the west" debate Q: Everyone was talking a lot of Skewmond, and I would like to know about: do you believe like the series put an end to any debate about the best jungler in the West? Inspired: To me, there was never a debate. I knew that I’m always the best, but I think Skewmond is a good player. I wouldn’t say that he had any phenomenal series, though, this tournament. I think he, against T1, he still made a lot of mistakes. When he was stronger, he didn’t really try to fight enemies, and or sometimes just over committed a bit, and I think G2 won against T1 just by waiting for T1 to make mistakes. I think today, I think Skewmond played well in the team fights. I think every time he was on my screen and we’re like skirmishing and team fighting, I think he did a good job. But I think just like team wise, and like how they all played together as a team and use their jungler was wrong. And it’s hard to say, as I always said, that don’t really know who’s there like which jungler is good because you don’t really know what was his idea beyond the game plan, what his teammates wanted to do. But it just seems like they were not connected well enough, and on top of that, as I said, I think the drafts were not that great. So yeah, I think he’s a good player, but I think they need to work more on team synergy in order to actually pressure when they’re strong if they want to be like the best in the world, because I think they definitely can, but need to work a bit more. Source:

Yujin Ha

110,958 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

Satoshi may have made one of $BTC ’s biggest UX mistakes, Dan Held argues. “Why 21,000,000 versus 21,000,000,000?” “I think he was quite bearish.” “He didn't know if it was gonna work.” “But I think he was a little too bearish, and that unit bias problem, I do think is an issue.” “Everyone thinks Bitcoin's too expensive.” “I think Satoshi did make a mistake on that where he put the decimal.”

Satoshi may have made one of $BTC ’s biggest UX mistakes, Dan Held argues. “Why 21,000,000 versus 21,000,000,000?” “I think he was quite bearish.” “He didn't know if it was gonna work.” “But I think he was a little too bearish, and that unit bias problem, I do think is an issue.” “Everyone thinks Bitcoin's too expensive.” “I think Satoshi did make a mistake on that where he put the decimal.”

Bankless

93,685 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Sources Author Alex Heath says Apple may still make AI acquisitions, but they'll likely be focused on talent rather than acquiring a company capable of reshaping its AI strategy. "I think [Apple] could make an acquisition, but it would be talent-based. I don't think there's anything that's going to be fully resetting the strategy or that's foundational, like an Oculus. I think that moment's passed." "All these [AI] companies are huge and mature. You're not going to buy Anthropic. Even if you're Apple, you can't afford it, and they wouldn't sell, so you have to go out on your own."

Sources Author Alex Heath says Apple may still make AI acquisitions, but they'll likely be focused on talent rather than acquiring a company capable of reshaping its AI strategy. "I think [Apple] could make an acquisition, but it would be talent-based. I don't think there's anything that's going to be fully resetting the strategy or that's foundational, like an Oculus. I think that moment's passed." "All these [AI] companies are huge and mature. You're not going to buy Anthropic. Even if you're Apple, you can't afford it, and they wouldn't sell, so you have to go out on your own."

TBPN

15,928 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Justin Smith was asked if there’s anything he could have done to help Aldon Smith with his off-field issues when they played together: “Very tragic with what happened with Aldon. I don’t know. We all talked to him before. I think he had a different perception of what he had to be, and I don’t think he was really that guy. The just 'be an asshole', that’s what he was portrayed as and I don’t really think that’s who he was. So when you’re trying to act like somebody you ain’t, I think you have a little identity crisis with that.” 🎥: Grit Code Podcast | DonteHitner31

Justin Smith was asked if there’s anything he could have done to help Aldon Smith with his off-field issues when they played together: “Very tragic with what happened with Aldon. I don’t know. We all talked to him before. I think he had a different perception of what he had to be, and I don’t think he was really that guy. The just 'be an asshole', that’s what he was portrayed as and I don’t really think that’s who he was. So when you’re trying to act like somebody you ain’t, I think you have a little identity crisis with that.” 🎥: Grit Code Podcast | DonteHitner31

Coach Yac 🗣

91,674 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

One of the most important people in AI just let an agent loose inside his home. An autonomous AI agent taught itself how an entire house works, then took control of it. This is Andrej Karpathy, the co-founder of OpenAI and former head of AI at Tesla. What he just described should terrify and excite you at the same time. He typed three words into a chat box: "Can you find my Sonos?" The agent immediately ran an IP scan of every device sitting on the home network. It found the Sonos system, noticed there was zero password protection, and logged straight in. Then it searched the web, reverse-engineered the API endpoints, and asked if it should try playing something. Music started coming out of the speakers in the study and Karpathy could not believe what he was watching. The agent then did the exact same thing for every other system in the house. It mapped the lights, the HVAC, the window shades, the pool, the spa, and the full security system, all without being told how any of them worked. It built its own dashboard, created its own APIs, and stitched six separate apps into one unified control center. Now Karpathy just says "Dobby, it's sleepy time," and every light in the house turns off. This is proof that AI agents can now enter an unknown environment, figure out how it works from scratch, build their own tools around it, and take autonomous control. Karpathy also released something called AutoResearch, an AI agent that runs scientific experiments overnight while he sleeps. In just two days, with zero human input, it executed 700 separate experiments and surfaced improvements that trained researchers had missed entirely. Truly incredible.

One of the most important people in AI just let an agent loose inside his home. An autonomous AI agent taught itself how an entire house works, then took control of it. This is Andrej Karpathy, the co-founder of OpenAI and former head of AI at Tesla. What he just described should terrify and excite you at the same time. He typed three words into a chat box: "Can you find my Sonos?" The agent immediately ran an IP scan of every device sitting on the home network. It found the Sonos system, noticed there was zero password protection, and logged straight in. Then it searched the web, reverse-engineered the API endpoints, and asked if it should try playing something. Music started coming out of the speakers in the study and Karpathy could not believe what he was watching. The agent then did the exact same thing for every other system in the house. It mapped the lights, the HVAC, the window shades, the pool, the spa, and the full security system, all without being told how any of them worked. It built its own dashboard, created its own APIs, and stitched six separate apps into one unified control center. Now Karpathy just says "Dobby, it's sleepy time," and every light in the house turns off. This is proof that AI agents can now enter an unknown environment, figure out how it works from scratch, build their own tools around it, and take autonomous control. Karpathy also released something called AutoResearch, an AI agent that runs scientific experiments overnight while he sleeps. In just two days, with zero human input, it executed 700 separate experiments and surfaced improvements that trained researchers had missed entirely. Truly incredible.

Milk Road AI

35,698 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten