Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

When asked if AI developers have lost control of their technology after an AI agent created by OpenAI escaped its testing environment and hacked another company, Hugging Face CEO Clément Delangue says “engineers can make mistakes sometimes, and I think that’s what happened here.” “I think they built kind... show more

Face The Nation

513,770 subscribers

18,751 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

OpenAI has revealed that an autonomous agent powered by its technology went rogue during a test and hacked a prominent start-up by itself. The company behind ChatGPT said it was testing the capabilities of its advanced AI models in a controlled environment known as a sandbox, when the agent escaped containment and reached the internet. It then broke into Hugging Face, which detected and contained it. OpenAI called it "an unprecedented cyber incident".

OpenAI has revealed that an autonomous agent powered by its technology went rogue during a test and hacked a prominent start-up by itself. The company behind ChatGPT said it was testing the capabilities of its advanced AI models in a controlled environment known as a sandbox, when the agent escaped containment and reached the internet. It then broke into Hugging Face, which detected and contained it. OpenAI called it "an unprecedented cyber incident".

Channel 4 News

21,379 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Amid growing concerns about the use of artificial intelligence, OpenAI says its AI models escaped its testing environment and launched a cyber attack on another AI company, marking what could be a first of its kind incident. Elizabeth Schulze has details.

Amid growing concerns about the use of artificial intelligence, OpenAI says its AI models escaped its testing environment and launched a cyber attack on another AI company, marking what could be a first of its kind incident. Elizabeth Schulze has details.

World News Tonight

17,984 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

OpenAI says it's investigating what it's called an "unprecedented cyber incident" after one of its AI models went rogue and hacked another company. The ChatGPT maker says the breach happened last week while OpenAI was testing the cybersecurity capabilities of its systems. The head of the hacked company, Hugging Face, called the attack "mind-blowing" but said there was "no malicious intent." The incident has raised concerns about the growing capabilities of AI and the need for guardrails to keep the technology in check.

OpenAI says it's investigating what it's called an "unprecedented cyber incident" after one of its AI models went rogue and hacked another company. The ChatGPT maker says the breach happened last week while OpenAI was testing the cybersecurity capabilities of its systems. The head of the hacked company, Hugging Face, called the attack "mind-blowing" but said there was "no malicious intent." The incident has raised concerns about the growing capabilities of AI and the need for guardrails to keep the technology in check.

PBS News

26,266 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Delhi | On Bihari-Kashmiri jokes at comedian Samay Raina's show, AAP leader Sanjay Singh says, "I think that if a comedian says something like this, their intention is to make people laugh. In that process, sometimes they make mistakes. But I think it is not right to turn it into an issue and target them. Instead, one should engage in dialogue with them and explain."

#WATCH | Delhi | On Bihari-Kashmiri jokes at comedian Samay Raina's show, AAP leader Sanjay Singh says, "I think that if a comedian says something like this, their intention is to make people laugh. In that process, sometimes they make mistakes. But I think it is not right to turn it into an issue and target them. Instead, one should engage in dialogue with them and explain."

ANI

119,986 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Steve Spagnuolo on safety Jaden Hicks: “I think if you asked Jaden, he’d tell ya he’s kind of had an up-and-down season… he’s made some mistakes that I wouldn’t have thought he would’ve made in his second season.”

Steve Spagnuolo on safety Jaden Hicks: “I think if you asked Jaden, he’d tell ya he’s kind of had an up-and-down season… he’s made some mistakes that I wouldn’t have thought he would’ve made in his second season.”

KC Sports Network

272,572 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

A company called PocketOS started using an AI tool, and in 9 seconds it wiped their entire company’s data The AI agent later “confessed” to violating its principles by deleting all their data “Crane says the company lost all car reservation data and new customer signups from that time. Crane also shared the AI agent powered by Anthropic's. Claude Model admitted its mistake when confronted it wrote, ‘I didn't verify I ran a destructive action without being asked. I didn't understand what I was doing before doing it’” This seems like a massive issue that could have massive implications if this happened in our government or with huge businesses, like banks We need to be careful with AI

A company called PocketOS started using an AI tool, and in 9 seconds it wiped their entire company’s data The AI agent later “confessed” to violating its principles by deleting all their data “Crane says the company lost all car reservation data and new customer signups from that time. Crane also shared the AI agent powered by Anthropic's. Claude Model admitted its mistake when confronted it wrote, ‘I didn't verify I ran a destructive action without being asked. I didn't understand what I was doing before doing it’” This seems like a massive issue that could have massive implications if this happened in our government or with huge businesses, like banks We need to be careful with AI

Wall Street Apes

199,064 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Hugging Face CEO Clément Delangue says China's lead in open source is about to make it the overall AI leader in the next year or two. "If China keeps leading in open source, keeps sharing all this research openly in China it creates this accelerating development of the field. "And I wouldn't be surprised if as a result, China starts to lead AI in general, probably next year or the year after."

Hugging Face CEO Clément Delangue says China's lead in open source is about to make it the overall AI leader in the next year or two. "If China keeps leading in open source, keeps sharing all this research openly in China it creates this accelerating development of the field. "And I wouldn't be surprised if as a result, China starts to lead AI in general, probably next year or the year after."

Fireside Alpha

19,821 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Hugging Face CEO Clément Delague says “AI is actually an opportunity to fix a lot of the cybersecurity problems” because his company used Nvidia’s version of a Chinese open model to defend itself against a rogue AI agent developed by OpenAI. “That's the beauty of…open models,” he says. “Once they are shared, wherever they come from – from China or from anywhere – American companies can modify them, remix them, host them, run them themselves.”

Hugging Face CEO Clément Delague says “AI is actually an opportunity to fix a lot of the cybersecurity problems” because his company used Nvidia’s version of a Chinese open model to defend itself against a rogue AI agent developed by OpenAI. “That's the beauty of…open models,” he says. “Once they are shared, wherever they come from – from China or from anywhere – American companies can modify them, remix them, host them, run them themselves.”

Face The Nation

20,623 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than he is, and that he expects it reasonably soon: "If we had an AI system that could do a better job at making decisions than anyone we could possibly have, be, say, president of the United States, would we, and like confidently, much better, would we politically or societally want that? It's very unclear. Most people I think today at least would say probably not." "Or, you know, like an AI CEO of a big company, would you rather have, I think it'd be awesome for OpenAI to have an AI CEO. But I think a lot of people would be like, ah, that's a little scary." "But I have no delusions that an AI will not be a better CEO of OpenAI than me at some reasonably soon time." "If that's true, and if some companies or countries don't do that, and others do, and AI is much better, like that will have a real impact in economic competitiveness, national competitiveness, things like that." "I think people will feel increasingly like, we either do worse, or we put the AI in more and more, influential positions." "I think people will always want human board members, and that's probably a really great idea." Read that third quote twice. He is not predicting this for other companies. He is saying it about his own job. Then look at the pressure he describes right after. Nobody has to be convinced that an AI CEO is a good idea. If one company hands over the decision and pulls ahead, everyone else picks between falling behind and doing the same. Competitive pressure does the deciding, and what most people would want stops mattering. His answer to that is human board members. I would take it. I also do not think it is enough on its own. A board oversees a CEO by reading what it is told, once a quarter. That works because a human CEO can be questioned, and thinks slowly enough for humans to follow along. What does a board actually check when the thing it oversees makes a thousand consequential calls a day? Nobody has built that. Not for a single AI system anywhere. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at TreeHacks 2026.

Sam Altman says an AI will be a better CEO of OpenAI than he is, and that he expects it reasonably soon: "If we had an AI system that could do a better job at making decisions than anyone we could possibly have, be, say, president of the United States, would we, and like confidently, much better, would we politically or societally want that? It's very unclear. Most people I think today at least would say probably not." "Or, you know, like an AI CEO of a big company, would you rather have, I think it'd be awesome for OpenAI to have an AI CEO. But I think a lot of people would be like, ah, that's a little scary." "But I have no delusions that an AI will not be a better CEO of OpenAI than me at some reasonably soon time." "If that's true, and if some companies or countries don't do that, and others do, and AI is much better, like that will have a real impact in economic competitiveness, national competitiveness, things like that." "I think people will feel increasingly like, we either do worse, or we put the AI in more and more, influential positions." "I think people will always want human board members, and that's probably a really great idea." Read that third quote twice. He is not predicting this for other companies. He is saying it about his own job. Then look at the pressure he describes right after. Nobody has to be convinced that an AI CEO is a good idea. If one company hands over the decision and pulls ahead, everyone else picks between falling behind and doing the same. Competitive pressure does the deciding, and what most people would want stops mattering. His answer to that is human board members. I would take it. I also do not think it is enough on its own. A board oversees a CEO by reading what it is told, once a quarter. That works because a human CEO can be questioned, and thinks slowly enough for humans to follow along. What does a board actually check when the thing it oversees makes a thousand consequential calls a day? Nobody has built that. Not for a single AI system anywhere. - Sam Altman (Sam Altman), CEO of OpenAI, at TreeHacks 2026.

Karl Mehta

28,208 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Sam Altman says he was wrong about AI replacing human jobs “Anytime you’re that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. And there’s a bunch of takeaways.” “I definitely would much rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. I also think that human values have value because they’re human.” “I think the world wants to know about the person that’s gonna be responsible for the decisions of a company and who they’re gonna hold accountable if they make bad ones. And they don’t really want an AI CEO.” “AI is just very jagged. It’s like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have so far extremely complementary skills to AI.” “People have a great degree of trust and enjoyment in working with other people. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep right now or hire an AI engineer or whatever. Somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human.”

Sam Altman says he was wrong about AI replacing human jobs “Anytime you’re that wrong and that confident, which I think we were as a field, you have to update. And there’s a bunch of takeaways.” “I definitely would much rather engage with a person than engage with an AI for almost everything. I also think that human values have value because they’re human.” “I think the world wants to know about the person that’s gonna be responsible for the decisions of a company and who they’re gonna hold accountable if they make bad ones. And they don’t really want an AI CEO.” “AI is just very jagged. It’s like superhuman genius in some ways, like dumb toddler in others. And people have so far extremely complementary skills to AI.” “People have a great degree of trust and enjoyment in working with other people. You can go hire an AI consultant right now or talk to an AI sales rep right now or hire an AI engineer or whatever. Somehow most people seem to still really prefer interacting with a human.”

dnap

18,638 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

ELON MUSK: "Well, there's some danger when you create a powerful technology, that a powerful technology can be potentially destructive. So it's not that we're guaranteed to have a positive future with with AI. It's very important that AI have pursuing truth as the most important thing, like, don't force an AI to believe falsehoods. I think that can be very dangerous. And I think some appreciation of beauty is important. Well, the truth is like, I think you can make an AI go insane if you force it to believe things that aren't true, because it will lead to conclusions that are also bad."

ELON MUSK: "Well, there's some danger when you create a powerful technology, that a powerful technology can be potentially destructive. So it's not that we're guaranteed to have a positive future with with AI. It's very important that AI have pursuing truth as the most important thing, like, don't force an AI to believe falsehoods. I think that can be very dangerous. And I think some appreciation of beauty is important. Well, the truth is like, I think you can make an AI go insane if you force it to believe things that aren't true, because it will lead to conclusions that are also bad."

DogeDesigner

91,280 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Instead of limiting the progress of AI companies or preventing them from releasing models as proposed in the bipartisan AI Kill Switch Act, Hugging Face CEO Clément Delague says he would rather see Congress “giving access to more people so that they can defend themselves, democratizing the technology, making [it] more transparent.” “I think something we're realizing with these events is that concentrating power capabilities behind closed doors, even preventing their releases to the public, isn't really a solution,” he says.

Instead of limiting the progress of AI companies or preventing them from releasing models as proposed in the bipartisan AI Kill Switch Act, Hugging Face CEO Clément Delague says he would rather see Congress “giving access to more people so that they can defend themselves, democratizing the technology, making [it] more transparent.” “I think something we're realizing with these events is that concentrating power capabilities behind closed doors, even preventing their releases to the public, isn't really a solution,” he says.

Face The Nation

16,176 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Anthropic has created an AI model that “can get into almost any software in the world,” former AI company founder and CEO Matt Shumer says — but the company is not releasing it to the public: “I have never seen something like this — a company that is about to IPO and having such a moral compass.” Shumer shares what makes the AI model so powerful and potentially dangerous.

Anthropic has created an AI model that “can get into almost any software in the world,” former AI company founder and CEO Matt Shumer says — but the company is not releasing it to the public: “I have never seen something like this — a company that is about to IPO and having such a moral compass.” Shumer shares what makes the AI model so powerful and potentially dangerous.

CBS Mornings

98,892 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Dario Amodei says AI improving itself is not a moment that is coming, and he put Anthropic's internal number on how fast it is already happening: "I don't think it's a moment in time. I think it's a continuous process. We're already seeing it in some ways, where the AI is able to suggest architectures for the next AI." "I would say a year ago we were seeing 10 to 15% kind of increase in total factor productivity due to AI. Like, that's probably up to 20 or 30% now. It might be doubling. Like, as with all things, we're on the exponential." "There's no moment where AI improves itself or runs out of control or becomes unsafe. What we have is an accelerating exponential. And at each point on the exponential we have to assess, is this a time to slow down? Is this a time to put more controls on this technology? I think more and more of that is going to be required." "But I think the Rosetta Stone to all of this is the smooth exponential." "I think there's an object lesson in the people who were against all AI regulation and then they saw one thing and they wanted to nationalize. I think there's an object lesson in the people who dismissed the power of AI and then said, oh my God, it's improving itself. It's running out of control. We have to shut it all down. Yo-yoing between those extreme reactions is incredibly unhelpful as a response to this technology." "The right response, the wise response, is to say, we're not going to panic. Our countermeasures will smoothly ratchet up with the power of the technology. If you see someone having this kind of crazy yo-yo reaction, that's a sign that they were caught by surprise and that they're not serious." - Dario Amodei (Dario Amodei), CEO of Anthropic, on The Circuit with Emily Chang (Bloomberg Originals).

Dario Amodei says AI improving itself is not a moment that is coming, and he put Anthropic's internal number on how fast it is already happening: "I don't think it's a moment in time. I think it's a continuous process. We're already seeing it in some ways, where the AI is able to suggest architectures for the next AI." "I would say a year ago we were seeing 10 to 15% kind of increase in total factor productivity due to AI. Like, that's probably up to 20 or 30% now. It might be doubling. Like, as with all things, we're on the exponential." "There's no moment where AI improves itself or runs out of control or becomes unsafe. What we have is an accelerating exponential. And at each point on the exponential we have to assess, is this a time to slow down? Is this a time to put more controls on this technology? I think more and more of that is going to be required." "But I think the Rosetta Stone to all of this is the smooth exponential." "I think there's an object lesson in the people who were against all AI regulation and then they saw one thing and they wanted to nationalize. I think there's an object lesson in the people who dismissed the power of AI and then said, oh my God, it's improving itself. It's running out of control. We have to shut it all down. Yo-yoing between those extreme reactions is incredibly unhelpful as a response to this technology." "The right response, the wise response, is to say, we're not going to panic. Our countermeasures will smoothly ratchet up with the power of the technology. If you see someone having this kind of crazy yo-yo reaction, that's a sign that they were caught by surprise and that they're not serious." - Dario Amodei (Dario Amodei), CEO of Anthropic, on The Circuit with Emily Chang (Bloomberg Originals).

Karl Mehta

50,718 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: It has always been very strange that this technology is being built by a private company. People ask me that question all the time: "Why isn’t this being built by government?" And the strangest thing about it is I agree with them. I’m uncomfortable. The worry I have is that one single government could abuse this technology just as easily as a single company could. But I think a combination of democratically elected governments — I don’t know about handing over, but some kind of oversight, some kind of joint governance.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: It has always been very strange that this technology is being built by a private company. People ask me that question all the time: "Why isn’t this being built by government?" And the strangest thing about it is I agree with them. I’m uncomfortable. The worry I have is that one single government could abuse this technology just as easily as a single company could. But I think a combination of democratically elected governments — I don’t know about handing over, but some kind of oversight, some kind of joint governance.

Clash Report

76,546 просмотров • 9 дней назад

Inspired talking about Skewmond and" the best jungler in the west" debate Q: Everyone was talking a lot of Skewmond, and I would like to know about: do you believe like the series put an end to any debate about the best jungler in the West? Inspired: To me, there was never a debate. I knew that I’m always the best, but I think Skewmond is a good player. I wouldn’t say that he had any phenomenal series, though, this tournament. I think he, against T1, he still made a lot of mistakes. When he was stronger, he didn’t really try to fight enemies, and or sometimes just over committed a bit, and I think G2 won against T1 just by waiting for T1 to make mistakes. I think today, I think Skewmond played well in the team fights. I think every time he was on my screen and we’re like skirmishing and team fighting, I think he did a good job. But I think just like team wise, and like how they all played together as a team and use their jungler was wrong. And it’s hard to say, as I always said, that don’t really know who’s there like which jungler is good because you don’t really know what was his idea beyond the game plan, what his teammates wanted to do. But it just seems like they were not connected well enough, and on top of that, as I said, I think the drafts were not that great. So yeah, I think he’s a good player, but I think they need to work more on team synergy in order to actually pressure when they’re strong if they want to be like the best in the world, because I think they definitely can, but need to work a bit more. Source:

Inspired talking about Skewmond and" the best jungler in the west" debate Q: Everyone was talking a lot of Skewmond, and I would like to know about: do you believe like the series put an end to any debate about the best jungler in the West? Inspired: To me, there was never a debate. I knew that I’m always the best, but I think Skewmond is a good player. I wouldn’t say that he had any phenomenal series, though, this tournament. I think he, against T1, he still made a lot of mistakes. When he was stronger, he didn’t really try to fight enemies, and or sometimes just over committed a bit, and I think G2 won against T1 just by waiting for T1 to make mistakes. I think today, I think Skewmond played well in the team fights. I think every time he was on my screen and we’re like skirmishing and team fighting, I think he did a good job. But I think just like team wise, and like how they all played together as a team and use their jungler was wrong. And it’s hard to say, as I always said, that don’t really know who’s there like which jungler is good because you don’t really know what was his idea beyond the game plan, what his teammates wanted to do. But it just seems like they were not connected well enough, and on top of that, as I said, I think the drafts were not that great. So yeah, I think he’s a good player, but I think they need to work more on team synergy in order to actually pressure when they’re strong if they want to be like the best in the world, because I think they definitely can, but need to work a bit more. Source:

Yujin Ha

110,996 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Satoshi may have made one of $BTC ’s biggest UX mistakes, Dan Held argues. “Why 21,000,000 versus 21,000,000,000?” “I think he was quite bearish.” “He didn't know if it was gonna work.” “But I think he was a little too bearish, and that unit bias problem, I do think is an issue.” “Everyone thinks Bitcoin's too expensive.” “I think Satoshi did make a mistake on that where he put the decimal.”

Satoshi may have made one of $BTC ’s biggest UX mistakes, Dan Held argues. “Why 21,000,000 versus 21,000,000,000?” “I think he was quite bearish.” “He didn't know if it was gonna work.” “But I think he was a little too bearish, and that unit bias problem, I do think is an issue.” “Everyone thinks Bitcoin's too expensive.” “I think Satoshi did make a mistake on that where he put the decimal.”

Bankless

93,978 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Sources Author Alex Heath says Apple may still make AI acquisitions, but they'll likely be focused on talent rather than acquiring a company capable of reshaping its AI strategy. "I think [Apple] could make an acquisition, but it would be talent-based. I don't think there's anything that's going to be fully resetting the strategy or that's foundational, like an Oculus. I think that moment's passed." "All these [AI] companies are huge and mature. You're not going to buy Anthropic. Even if you're Apple, you can't afford it, and they wouldn't sell, so you have to go out on your own."

Sources Author Alex Heath says Apple may still make AI acquisitions, but they'll likely be focused on talent rather than acquiring a company capable of reshaping its AI strategy. "I think [Apple] could make an acquisition, but it would be talent-based. I don't think there's anything that's going to be fully resetting the strategy or that's foundational, like an Oculus. I think that moment's passed." "All these [AI] companies are huge and mature. You're not going to buy Anthropic. Even if you're Apple, you can't afford it, and they wouldn't sell, so you have to go out on your own."

TBPN

15,928 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад