Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

When asked to condemn the phrase “globalize the intifada,” which many view as a call for violence against the Jewish people, Zohran Mamdani refused to do so, instead using the opportunity to attack President Trump on national television. Mamdani isn’t just a young politician with a big smile. He... show more

Marsha Blackburn

108,551 subscribers

72,201 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Comedy Nachrichten & Politik Gesundheit & Wellness

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

.Kristen Welker to Mamdani: Do you condemn that phrase, Globalize the Intifada? But do you actually condemn it..which a lot of people hear as a call to violence against Jews? For the people who .. feel really concerned by that phrase, why not just condemn it? Mamdani’s reply ⬇️

.Kristen Welker to Mamdani: Do you condemn that phrase, Globalize the Intifada? But do you actually condemn it..which a lot of people hear as a call to violence against Jews? For the people who .. feel really concerned by that phrase, why not just condemn it? Mamdani’s reply ⬇️

Jacob N. Kornbluh

786,863 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

‘RADICAL LEFT’: NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Kwame Mamdani's decision to stop using the phrase “globalize the intifada” is a purely political move, considering that he has yet to condemn it, “StopAntisemitism” founder Liora Rez says.

‘RADICAL LEFT’: NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Kwame Mamdani's decision to stop using the phrase “globalize the intifada” is a purely political move, considering that he has yet to condemn it, “StopAntisemitism” founder Liora Rez says.

Fox News

276,426 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨Mamdani responding to renewed criticism re: refusal to condemn ‘globalize the intifada’ slogan: “I continue to discourage the use of that phrase, a phrase that I do not use myself, and I continue to focus on the work at hand of keeping Jewish New Yorkers safe in the city.”

🚨Mamdani responding to renewed criticism re: refusal to condemn ‘globalize the intifada’ slogan: “I continue to discourage the use of that phrase, a phrase that I do not use myself, and I continue to focus on the work at hand of keeping Jewish New Yorkers safe in the city.”

Jacob N. Kornbluh

566,444 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani is openly playing footsie with radical anti-Semitic elements on the left. “Globalize the Intifada” is the rallying cry. I offered this guy a lay-up and a chance to condemn it. They simply cannot bring themselves to do it 👇

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani is openly playing footsie with radical anti-Semitic elements on the left. “Globalize the Intifada” is the rallying cry. I offered this guy a lay-up and a chance to condemn it. They simply cannot bring themselves to do it 👇

Scott Jennings

358,407 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

ADL chief Jonathan Greenblatt suggests Zohran Mamdani “believes” in the ‘Globalize the Intifada’ slogan because he won’t condemn it and questions why Mamdani hasn’t visited a single synagogue + “hasn’t been to any mainstream Jewish institution.”

ADL chief Jonathan Greenblatt suggests Zohran Mamdani “believes” in the ‘Globalize the Intifada’ slogan because he won’t condemn it and questions why Mamdani hasn’t visited a single synagogue + “hasn’t been to any mainstream Jewish institution.”

Jacob N. Kornbluh

1,156,367 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“Tel Aviv isn’t the sixth borough of NYC.” Neither is Uganda. “Zohran Mamdani doesn’t hate Jews.” He actually hates Jews, Hindus, white people, and America. “Globalize the intifada isn’t a call to violence.” Really? Calling for bus bombings and stabbings seems violent.

“Tel Aviv isn’t the sixth borough of NYC.” Neither is Uganda. “Zohran Mamdani doesn’t hate Jews.” He actually hates Jews, Hindus, white people, and America. “Globalize the intifada isn’t a call to violence.” Really? Calling for bus bombings and stabbings seems violent.

Eyal Yakoby

123,998 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Mamdani tells Errol Louis (@errollouis.bsky.social) he’d discourage to use ‘Globalize the Intifada’ slogan because the distance between what some intend as a form of protest and what most Jewish New Yorkers hear as a call to violence is “a bridge that is too far.”

Mamdani tells Errol Louis (@errollouis.bsky.social) he’d discourage to use ‘Globalize the Intifada’ slogan because the distance between what some intend as a form of protest and what most Jewish New Yorkers hear as a call to violence is “a bridge that is too far.”

Jacob N. Kornbluh

1,413,778 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

As commonsense Democrats, we're against socialism, higher taxes, and antisemitism. “Globalize the Intifada” refers to a horrific wave of terror — attacks that left more than a thousand Jews dead. With antisemitic violence at record highs, Zohran Kwame Mamdani's refusal to condemn violent and hateful rhetoric is unacceptable.

As commonsense Democrats, we're against socialism, higher taxes, and antisemitism. “Globalize the Intifada” refers to a horrific wave of terror — attacks that left more than a thousand Jews dead. With antisemitic violence at record highs, Zohran Kwame Mamdani's refusal to condemn violent and hateful rhetoric is unacceptable.

Rep Josh Gottheimer

299,945 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 Zohran Mamdani on The Brian Lehrer Show and A Daily Politics Podcast: ‘Globalize the Intifada’ has “a variety of meanings to a variety of people. “That is not language that I use. The language that I use is that of clarity. “And I do not believe it is the mayor’s position to be policing language.” Listen 🎧

🚨 Zohran Mamdani on The Brian Lehrer Show and A Daily Politics Podcast: ‘Globalize the Intifada’ has “a variety of meanings to a variety of people. “That is not language that I use. The language that I use is that of clarity. “And I do not believe it is the mayor’s position to be policing language.” Listen 🎧

Jacob N. Kornbluh

269,381 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

NBC’s Kristen Welker pressed NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani three times today to condemn the slogan “Globalize the Intifada.” He declined. Welker: ➤ “Do you condemn that phrase, Globalize the Intifada?” ➤ “But do you actually condemn it… which a lot of people hear as a call to violence against Jews?” ➤ “For the people who feel really concerned by that phrase, why not just condemn it?” Mamdani did not condemn the phrase—and he has explicitly rejected any incitement to violence. As he told The Bulwark: “I’ve been clear that any incitement to violence is something that I’m in opposition to.” Intifada—Arabic for “uprising” or “shaking off”—has historically referred to a wide spectrum of resistance. The First Intifada (1987–1993) was driven by mass boycotts, general strikes, student protests, and civil disobedience. It was largely nonviolent in its early stages. Many supporters of the slogan say “Globalize the Intifada” draws from that legacy: a call for international solidarity through protest, divestment, and organized resistance to apartheid, occupation, and genocide—not violence. Below are some common claims made against using the phrase, and the context they ignore: ❌ Claim 1: “Intifada” refers to violent Palestinian uprisings, so invoking it globally implies promoting violence against Jews. Supporters argue this reduces the term to its most militant associations and erases its broader meaning. The First Intifada began as a largely nonviolent, community-led uprising—characterized by strikes, protests, and boycotts. To “globalize” that tradition is to extend a call for collective resistance to injustice, not armed struggle. ❌ Claim 2: The phrase glorifies past violence. Liberation movements are often framed this way. The same was said of anti-apartheid slogans in South Africa—and of “By Any Means Necessary” during the U.S. Black liberation struggle, a phrase made famous by Malcolm X and later embraced by radical groups like the Black Panthers. Critics called it militant, but supporters saw it as a refusal to accept injustice on anyone else’s terms. Likewise, supporters of “Globalize the Intifada” say the slogan is not about glorifying violence—it’s about rejecting silence in the face of ongoing atrocity. ❌ Claim 3: It’s provocative—and therefore threatening. It is provocative—because it challenges power. So did “Black Power,” “No Justice, No Peace,” and “Land Back.” Political slogans are meant to confront injustice, not make it comfortable. Arabic political speech is often racialized in the West, seen as inherently violent or threatening—regardless of content. That helps explain the reaction to “intifada.” But even if the phrase were “Globalize Resistance,” it likely wouldn’t be accepted either. Supporters argue the real discomfort isn’t with the wording—it’s with the demand itself, and who’s making it. ❌ Claim 4: Even if not intended as such, it may incite violence. This is guilt by association. Every protest movement risks being misrepresented. But “Globalize the Intifada” has been overwhelmingly used in nonviolent student protests, cultural actions, and anti-genocide campaigns. Its targets are systems—occupation, apartheid, blockade—not civilians. A misreading by individuals doesn’t make the slogan itself violent. ❌ Claim 5: The phrase is dangerous because it could be co-opted by extremists. If that standard were applied universally, many mainstream political slogans would be disqualified. “Israel has a right to defend itself” has been repeatedly used to justify the genocide of the Palestinian people, including mass killing and forced displacement. “Am Yisrael Chai” (“The Nation of Israel Lives”) is chanted in settler marches that have ended in pogroms against Palestinian villages. Yet these slogans are judged by their context and usage—not banned outright. Supporters argue “Globalize the Intifada” should be held to the same standard.

NBC’s Kristen Welker pressed NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani three times today to condemn the slogan “Globalize the Intifada.” He declined. Welker: ➤ “Do you condemn that phrase, Globalize the Intifada?” ➤ “But do you actually condemn it… which a lot of people hear as a call to violence against Jews?” ➤ “For the people who feel really concerned by that phrase, why not just condemn it?” Mamdani did not condemn the phrase—and he has explicitly rejected any incitement to violence. As he told The Bulwark: “I’ve been clear that any incitement to violence is something that I’m in opposition to.” Intifada—Arabic for “uprising” or “shaking off”—has historically referred to a wide spectrum of resistance. The First Intifada (1987–1993) was driven by mass boycotts, general strikes, student protests, and civil disobedience. It was largely nonviolent in its early stages. Many supporters of the slogan say “Globalize the Intifada” draws from that legacy: a call for international solidarity through protest, divestment, and organized resistance to apartheid, occupation, and genocide—not violence. Below are some common claims made against using the phrase, and the context they ignore: ❌ Claim 1: “Intifada” refers to violent Palestinian uprisings, so invoking it globally implies promoting violence against Jews. Supporters argue this reduces the term to its most militant associations and erases its broader meaning. The First Intifada began as a largely nonviolent, community-led uprising—characterized by strikes, protests, and boycotts. To “globalize” that tradition is to extend a call for collective resistance to injustice, not armed struggle. ❌ Claim 2: The phrase glorifies past violence. Liberation movements are often framed this way. The same was said of anti-apartheid slogans in South Africa—and of “By Any Means Necessary” during the U.S. Black liberation struggle, a phrase made famous by Malcolm X and later embraced by radical groups like the Black Panthers. Critics called it militant, but supporters saw it as a refusal to accept injustice on anyone else’s terms. Likewise, supporters of “Globalize the Intifada” say the slogan is not about glorifying violence—it’s about rejecting silence in the face of ongoing atrocity. ❌ Claim 3: It’s provocative—and therefore threatening. It is provocative—because it challenges power. So did “Black Power,” “No Justice, No Peace,” and “Land Back.” Political slogans are meant to confront injustice, not make it comfortable. Arabic political speech is often racialized in the West, seen as inherently violent or threatening—regardless of content. That helps explain the reaction to “intifada.” But even if the phrase were “Globalize Resistance,” it likely wouldn’t be accepted either. Supporters argue the real discomfort isn’t with the wording—it’s with the demand itself, and who’s making it. ❌ Claim 4: Even if not intended as such, it may incite violence. This is guilt by association. Every protest movement risks being misrepresented. But “Globalize the Intifada” has been overwhelmingly used in nonviolent student protests, cultural actions, and anti-genocide campaigns. Its targets are systems—occupation, apartheid, blockade—not civilians. A misreading by individuals doesn’t make the slogan itself violent. ❌ Claim 5: The phrase is dangerous because it could be co-opted by extremists. If that standard were applied universally, many mainstream political slogans would be disqualified. “Israel has a right to defend itself” has been repeatedly used to justify the genocide of the Palestinian people, including mass killing and forced displacement. “Am Yisrael Chai” (“The Nation of Israel Lives”) is chanted in settler marches that have ended in pogroms against Palestinian villages. Yet these slogans are judged by their context and usage—not banned outright. Supporters argue “Globalize the Intifada” should be held to the same standard.

Drop Site

70,852 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“Don’t let them get away with it.” NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani claimed that “globalize the Intifada” is a call for Palestinian rights—and even compared it to the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. In this 2021 video, one man delivers the perfect response to Mamdani and anyone trying to normalize the word Intifada.

“Don’t let them get away with it.” NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani claimed that “globalize the Intifada” is a call for Palestinian rights—and even compared it to the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. In this 2021 video, one man delivers the perfect response to Mamdani and anyone trying to normalize the word Intifada.

Canary Mission

199,210 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Zohran Mamdani says he’s “happy to answer whatever comes to your mind” because NYC deserves accountability. But when asked tough questions, he dodges every time: ❌ Refused to condemn Hamas ❌ Refused to condemn “Globalize the Intifada” (a call to murder Jews) ❌ Refused to acknowledge dictatorships in Cuba & Venezuela ❌ Refused to address ties to Hasan Piker ❌ Refused to condemn DSA’s anti-Zionist resolution Accountability? Only when it’s politically convenient.

Zohran Mamdani says he’s “happy to answer whatever comes to your mind” because NYC deserves accountability. But when asked tough questions, he dodges every time: ❌ Refused to condemn Hamas ❌ Refused to condemn “Globalize the Intifada” (a call to murder Jews) ❌ Refused to acknowledge dictatorships in Cuba & Venezuela ❌ Refused to address ties to Hasan Piker ❌ Refused to condemn DSA’s anti-Zionist resolution Accountability? Only when it’s politically convenient.

Canary Mission

39,506 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Sen. Fetterman warns a new wave of radical Democratic candidates is embracing anti-Israel rhetoric, saying too many in his party refuse to call out what he views as growing anti-Semitism: “The difference between me and some other Democrats is that I’m willing to call out these individuals and the absurd things they’ve said, along with the beliefs they hold. The one thing they all seem to have in common is contempt for Israel, and that has increasingly become outright anti-Semitism. The individual who just won in Colorado refused to describe the firebombing of a group of Jews who were rallying for Israeli hostages—an attack in which a woman was killed—as anti-Semitic. She refused to call it what it was. That’s the point. There’s a strong correlation between being intensely anti-Israel and drifting into anti-Semitism. In my view, it also overlaps with intensely anti-American views. This same individual has expressed the belief that America deserved 9/11 and that Israel deserved the October 7 massacre. That trend has been building.”

Sen. Fetterman warns a new wave of radical Democratic candidates is embracing anti-Israel rhetoric, saying too many in his party refuse to call out what he views as growing anti-Semitism: “The difference between me and some other Democrats is that I’m willing to call out these individuals and the absurd things they’ve said, along with the beliefs they hold. The one thing they all seem to have in common is contempt for Israel, and that has increasingly become outright anti-Semitism. The individual who just won in Colorado refused to describe the firebombing of a group of Jews who were rallying for Israeli hostages—an attack in which a woman was killed—as anti-Semitic. She refused to call it what it was. That’s the point. There’s a strong correlation between being intensely anti-Israel and drifting into anti-Semitism. In my view, it also overlaps with intensely anti-American views. This same individual has expressed the belief that America deserved 9/11 and that Israel deserved the October 7 massacre. That trend has been building.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

141,243 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Top moments from President Trump and Zohran Mamdani’s time in the Oval Office today. 7. Trump defends Mamdani from people calling him a ‘jihadist,’ says he is a rational person. 6. Trump defends Mamdani after reporter asked him why he didn’t take a train. 5. Trump says he is fine with Mamdani calling him a despot because people have said way worse. 4. Trump says he would feel comfortable living in NYC with Mamdani as mayor. 3. Trump slaps Mamdani on the arm and says he can go ahead and call him a fascist. 2. Trump commends Mamdani for retaining a great police commissioner. 1. Trump says Mamdani has a chance to Make New York City Great Again.

Top moments from President Trump and Zohran Mamdani’s time in the Oval Office today. 7. Trump defends Mamdani from people calling him a ‘jihadist,’ says he is a rational person. 6. Trump defends Mamdani after reporter asked him why he didn’t take a train. 5. Trump says he is fine with Mamdani calling him a despot because people have said way worse. 4. Trump says he would feel comfortable living in NYC with Mamdani as mayor. 3. Trump slaps Mamdani on the arm and says he can go ahead and call him a fascist. 2. Trump commends Mamdani for retaining a great police commissioner. 1. Trump says Mamdani has a chance to Make New York City Great Again.

Collin Rugg

2,331,318 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten