Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

When Australian courts heard Ben Roberts-Smith's war crimes defamation case in 2021, they accepted anti-BRS testimony from three illiterate Afghan villagers who told the court in cross-examination that they hated Australian soldiers and saw them all as ''infidels.'' The court ruled that their testimony against Roberts-Smith was still reliable...

DrewPavlou's profile picture

Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼

258,503 subscribers

25,652 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & PolitikaBilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Crossing live to you from the Ben Roberts-Smith bail hearing. Judge will issue decision in 45 minutes. MAIN TAKEAWAYS FROM BEN ROBERTS-SMITH BAIL HEARING SO FAR: 1. Crown Prosecutor compared Ben Roberts-Smith alleged crimes to terrorism as though he were Naveed Akram. This was part of his argument as to why he should be kept in prison. 2. Crown Prosecutor alleges Roberts-Smith was planning on moving overseas without telling authorities. I have no idea what the evidence for this is considering Roberts-Smith also made repeated efforts to surrender himself to authorities. 3. Crown Prosecutor is heavily relying on the earlier defamation case for evidence. They view the Besanko findings as having substantially defined “the evidentiary landscape” and BRS’s own testimony as locked in. This is unusual because criminal trials are meant to be tried on their own evidence to the criminal standard, and the defence flagged exactly this - “this will be decided on a body of evidence that will be nothing like the body of evidence in this case”
0:51

Crossing live to you from the Ben Roberts-Smith bail hearing. Judge will issue decision in 45 minutes. MAIN TAKEAWAYS FROM BEN ROBERTS-SMITH BAIL HEARING SO FAR: 1. Crown Prosecutor compared Ben Roberts-Smith alleged crimes to terrorism as though he were Naveed Akram. This was part of his argument as to why he should be kept in prison. 2. Crown Prosecutor alleges Roberts-Smith was planning on moving overseas without telling authorities. I have no idea what the evidence for this is considering Roberts-Smith also made repeated efforts to surrender himself to authorities. 3. Crown Prosecutor is heavily relying on the earlier defamation case for evidence. They view the Besanko findings as having substantially defined “the evidentiary landscape” and BRS’s own testimony as locked in. This is unusual because criminal trials are meant to be tried on their own evidence to the criminal standard, and the defence flagged exactly this - “this will be decided on a body of evidence that will be nothing like the body of evidence in this case”

Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼

27,919 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Ben Roberts-Smith did not have 21 of his fellow soldiers come out against him in a coordinated campaign. Many of the witnesses were subpoenaed and reluctant to testify. One soldier told the court he didn’t even agree with the case, saying he was there “under extreme duress for killing bad dudes we went over there to kill.” We’re not actually having to choose between the good conscience of 21 SAS or BRS. It’s far more complicated. Prosecutors literally admitted they have almost no physical evidence. No crime scenes, no forensics, no bodies. The defamation case was decided on the lower balance of probabilities standard. Criminal charges require proof beyond reasonable doubt, very hard to attain with just testimony. Ben Roberts-Smith remains innocent until proven guilty.
1:49

Ben Roberts-Smith did not have 21 of his fellow soldiers come out against him in a coordinated campaign. Many of the witnesses were subpoenaed and reluctant to testify. One soldier told the court he didn’t even agree with the case, saying he was there “under extreme duress for killing bad dudes we went over there to kill.” We’re not actually having to choose between the good conscience of 21 SAS or BRS. It’s far more complicated. Prosecutors literally admitted they have almost no physical evidence. No crime scenes, no forensics, no bodies. The defamation case was decided on the lower balance of probabilities standard. Criminal charges require proof beyond reasonable doubt, very hard to attain with just testimony. Ben Roberts-Smith remains innocent until proven guilty.

auspill

130,396 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

PROTECTED CELLEBRITE REPORT OF WITNESS TEXTS FROM AIDAN KEARNEY'S MTD LEAKED TO SOCIAL MEDIA Aidan Kearney, whose abuse of the discovery process is well known and well documented after a phone extraction he received of a former girlfriend was leaked to social media, has now shared protected discovery from a murder case. That discovery has also found its way to this platform. The discovery is a Cellebrite report of a text message between Jen McCabe and her daughter and was presented in a hysterical fashion by Bederow Law in Kearney's motion to dismiss. Rather than interpret the text in a plain manner, as a mother telling her daughter not to discuss in fear of jeopardizing the case, Bederow included the text as a footnote claiming it was all part of a cover up. Laughable. Other leaks from this same protected discovery include texts messages between witnesses Kerry Roberts and Jen McCabe as well as screenshots of communications between witnesses and the CW victim advocate. Timothy J. Bradl, P.C. and Bederow Law are well aware of their client's documented abuse of discovery. They are also well aware of the protective order which they unsuccessfully requested the court remove. That ruling came more than 3 months ago. Further, both men have been tagged in leaks of their own messages with Kearney showing they were well aware people outside the legal team had access to discovery and grand jury minutes. To date, they have done nothing to stop the invasion of privacy of the witnesses. Their client is charged with intimidating and harassing witnesses and at this point, through their lack of action, they appear to be aiding him in further harassment of these same witnesses. Their culpability needs to be scrutinized. It's time for consequences. Enough is enough.
0:43

PROTECTED CELLEBRITE REPORT OF WITNESS TEXTS FROM AIDAN KEARNEY'S MTD LEAKED TO SOCIAL MEDIA Aidan Kearney, whose abuse of the discovery process is well known and well documented after a phone extraction he received of a former girlfriend was leaked to social media, has now shared protected discovery from a murder case. That discovery has also found its way to this platform. The discovery is a Cellebrite report of a text message between Jen McCabe and her daughter and was presented in a hysterical fashion by Bederow Law in Kearney's motion to dismiss. Rather than interpret the text in a plain manner, as a mother telling her daughter not to discuss in fear of jeopardizing the case, Bederow included the text as a footnote claiming it was all part of a cover up. Laughable. Other leaks from this same protected discovery include texts messages between witnesses Kerry Roberts and Jen McCabe as well as screenshots of communications between witnesses and the CW victim advocate. Timothy J. Bradl, P.C. and Bederow Law are well aware of their client's documented abuse of discovery. They are also well aware of the protective order which they unsuccessfully requested the court remove. That ruling came more than 3 months ago. Further, both men have been tagged in leaks of their own messages with Kearney showing they were well aware people outside the legal team had access to discovery and grand jury minutes. To date, they have done nothing to stop the invasion of privacy of the witnesses. Their client is charged with intimidating and harassing witnesses and at this point, through their lack of action, they appear to be aiding him in further harassment of these same witnesses. Their culpability needs to be scrutinized. It's time for consequences. Enough is enough.

Julie Carpenter

16,165 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

The Tate brothers' lawyer claims authorities pressured witnesses, forced plea deals, and says a defamation trial could collapse the case against them. "And this is the plan. They get them to the United Kingdom. They threaten with 100 years in jail, or they say you can have a plea offer for maybe two to five. You'll be out in a year and a half or two years. If they take that deal, they lose all their wealth, they lose their reputation." "And by the way, allegations never have to get proven in court because they admit that they're guilty. Governments force pleas from people all the time. That's what they wanna do, because they're losing the war of public opinion." "Moreover, in Romania, they brought about 30 or 31 women in to try to testify against these guys. And they told these women if you don't assign yourself or become a part of the victim list here, we're gonna put you in as corroborators." "It is garbage, it is a setup. So much so that we sued the wrongful accuser who initiated those charges out there in Palm Beach. And we've been litigating a case in Palm Beach for defamation for the past three years. That case is six months away from going to trial. If we go to trial and we win in that case, the narrative against them is over, it collapses."
1:47

The Tate brothers' lawyer claims authorities pressured witnesses, forced plea deals, and says a defamation trial could collapse the case against them. "And this is the plan. They get them to the United Kingdom. They threaten with 100 years in jail, or they say you can have a plea offer for maybe two to five. You'll be out in a year and a half or two years. If they take that deal, they lose all their wealth, they lose their reputation." "And by the way, allegations never have to get proven in court because they admit that they're guilty. Governments force pleas from people all the time. That's what they wanna do, because they're losing the war of public opinion." "Moreover, in Romania, they brought about 30 or 31 women in to try to testify against these guys. And they told these women if you don't assign yourself or become a part of the victim list here, we're gonna put you in as corroborators." "It is garbage, it is a setup. So much so that we sued the wrongful accuser who initiated those charges out there in Palm Beach. And we've been litigating a case in Palm Beach for defamation for the past three years. That case is six months away from going to trial. If we go to trial and we win in that case, the narrative against them is over, it collapses."

PBD Podcast

145,383 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

This lady had a msg from her friend today who is an army wife. She has told her info about the Afghan resettlement scheme that hasnt been made public. Out of the 32k Afghans that were moved to the UK, 60% werent actually eligible but this wasnt found out until they got here as none of them were vetted. The Afghan families are living on army camps next to where serving soldiers are living with their families. The afghan kids bully the british kids at the parks, the afghan families dont speak english & are stealing trollies full of shopping. Soldiers needing bigger homes on camp have been refused as they are for the Afghans. Like this lady says, they came here to be safe but we have open borders and anyone can come in...if somebody wanted to hurt these Afghans they would easily be able to get to them....how much more are we not being told 🤬
6:57

This lady had a msg from her friend today who is an army wife. She has told her info about the Afghan resettlement scheme that hasnt been made public. Out of the 32k Afghans that were moved to the UK, 60% werent actually eligible but this wasnt found out until they got here as none of them were vetted. The Afghan families are living on army camps next to where serving soldiers are living with their families. The afghan kids bully the british kids at the parks, the afghan families dont speak english & are stealing trollies full of shopping. Soldiers needing bigger homes on camp have been refused as they are for the Afghans. Like this lady says, they came here to be safe but we have open borders and anyone can come in...if somebody wanted to hurt these Afghans they would easily be able to get to them....how much more are we not being told 🤬

🤍𝕁𝕆🤍

184,942 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Friday's Federal Court hearing contained an extraordinary statement from government lawyers that should have all Australia's worried. #NotMyAustralia ABC reports that lawyers for Australian citizen and father of six #FreeDanDuggan told the Federal Court the extradition should be void because the alleged action was not a crime in Australia at the time. In response lawyers for the Attorney General told the Court that was not Australia's concern - it was for the United States to determine guilt or innocence of this Australian citizen. The Duggan's fight goes on. Please help this wonderful Aussie family keep up their fight for justice and Aussie sovereignty by making a donation here: #EnoughIsEnough
0:24

Friday's Federal Court hearing contained an extraordinary statement from government lawyers that should have all Australia's worried. #NotMyAustralia ABC reports that lawyers for Australian citizen and father of six #FreeDanDuggan told the Federal Court the extradition should be void because the alleged action was not a crime in Australia at the time. In response lawyers for the Attorney General told the Court that was not Australia's concern - it was for the United States to determine guilt or innocence of this Australian citizen. The Duggan's fight goes on. Please help this wonderful Aussie family keep up their fight for justice and Aussie sovereignty by making a donation here: #EnoughIsEnough

FreeDanDuggan

12,826 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Hurricane Helene was 2 months ago NEW: Asheville North Carolina victim crying “It hurts. It hurts to know that people's got family, that they haven't a clue where they're even at, and bodies that can't even be identified. But none of this is making the news. Nothing” FEMA not paying out, “I've got a brother up here. I've got my aunt that totally lost anything. And to the best of my knowledge, they still haven't heard back from their claims.” She says contractors are not being paid for their work clearing and building, “They haven't even been paid for their work or as a contractor to get all this debris on out of us because they've yet to be paid — those guys worked relentlessly” Says the government came in and did photo ops with helicopters and good but they haven’t seen them since We are the news now, make sure these stories get heard
2:07

Hurricane Helene was 2 months ago NEW: Asheville North Carolina victim crying “It hurts. It hurts to know that people's got family, that they haven't a clue where they're even at, and bodies that can't even be identified. But none of this is making the news. Nothing” FEMA not paying out, “I've got a brother up here. I've got my aunt that totally lost anything. And to the best of my knowledge, they still haven't heard back from their claims.” She says contractors are not being paid for their work clearing and building, “They haven't even been paid for their work or as a contractor to get all this debris on out of us because they've yet to be paid — those guys worked relentlessly” Says the government came in and did photo ops with helicopters and good but they haven’t seen them since We are the news now, make sure these stories get heard

Wall Street Apes

675,022 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The ruling by a High Court’ judge in the Mike Chimombe & Moses Mpofu case is very interesting. I encourage everyone in business, every director, Executive, tenderpreneur and every lawyer to watch it. The judge ruled that both accused have a case to answer. This means they must be put to their defence, and explain their conduct. Depriving them of such after the state rested its case would work against them and lead to their conviction. The judge articulated the law in detail and interpreted it clearly at great length explaining how he arrived at that decision. Note that the accused wanted the case dismissed, arguing that their clients had no case to answer since they didn’t award themselves the tender and that the tender was awarded to a company, not them as individuals. The hearing and subsequent ruling is interesting for the following reasons: •The two are accused of deceiving the state by submitting fraudulent documents and winning the tender. •The judge explains in detail the 3 essential elements /rails on which in a criminal case, a person accused of fraud can be acquitted without being put to their defence, that is the accused can apply for discharge at the close of the state’s case. • The first essential element is that there is no evidence presented linking the accused to the offence. The court has no choice but to acquit. •The second element is that there may be no evidence of an ingredient of the crime (there are essential ingredients of the crime), in which case the accused must be acquitted. •The third element is that the state witnesses’ testimony and evidence is so poor that a court cannot rely on it to convict, in which case the accused must be acquitted. •In their application for discharge, Mpofu and Chimombe didn’t raise essential element 3. In other words, they deemed the witnesses credible in their evidence. They didn’t argue that the evidence of the state witness isn’t credible. •Mpofu and Chimombe also didn’t raise element number 1, meaning they didn’t argue that they were not linked at all to the offence, in which case they would have persuaded the court for an acquittal. •The two accused sought to rely, in their application for discharge, on the second element, which is, they argued that an ingredient of the evidence of committing the crime was missing: in other words, they are arguing that indeed fraud, deception and misrepresentation occurred, but was not occasioned by them personally, but by companies that won the tenders. •The accused’s lawyer argued that the accused did not influence the award of the bid, may have participated by signing contracts after the award, but that is neither here nor there, making their involvement post facto. They further argued that the state dealt with a corporate entity, not an individual. The state would have to pierce the corporate veil through an application to that effect to get to Mpofu and Chimombe. This is where it gets more interesting. •The judge delves into the issue of the corporate veil in criminal matters in detail. He explains that the effect of section 277 of the criminal code and reform act is to remove the corporate veil that exists in common law on criminal issues relating to companies. It’s very important for employees and directors to grasp these aspects of the law. The judge also touches on aspects of vicarious liability. •The companies act and criminal code were modified a lot in the last ten years. Most people are not aware of this. •Watch the hearing and ruling and educate yourself. Busisa Moyo Tawanda Nyambirai @tino_chinyoka1 Retired Elder Rex M.E Midzi
26:32

The ruling by a High Court’ judge in the Mike Chimombe & Moses Mpofu case is very interesting. I encourage everyone in business, every director, Executive, tenderpreneur and every lawyer to watch it. The judge ruled that both accused have a case to answer. This means they must be put to their defence, and explain their conduct. Depriving them of such after the state rested its case would work against them and lead to their conviction. The judge articulated the law in detail and interpreted it clearly at great length explaining how he arrived at that decision. Note that the accused wanted the case dismissed, arguing that their clients had no case to answer since they didn’t award themselves the tender and that the tender was awarded to a company, not them as individuals. The hearing and subsequent ruling is interesting for the following reasons: •The two are accused of deceiving the state by submitting fraudulent documents and winning the tender. •The judge explains in detail the 3 essential elements /rails on which in a criminal case, a person accused of fraud can be acquitted without being put to their defence, that is the accused can apply for discharge at the close of the state’s case. • The first essential element is that there is no evidence presented linking the accused to the offence. The court has no choice but to acquit. •The second element is that there may be no evidence of an ingredient of the crime (there are essential ingredients of the crime), in which case the accused must be acquitted. •The third element is that the state witnesses’ testimony and evidence is so poor that a court cannot rely on it to convict, in which case the accused must be acquitted. •In their application for discharge, Mpofu and Chimombe didn’t raise essential element 3. In other words, they deemed the witnesses credible in their evidence. They didn’t argue that the evidence of the state witness isn’t credible. •Mpofu and Chimombe also didn’t raise element number 1, meaning they didn’t argue that they were not linked at all to the offence, in which case they would have persuaded the court for an acquittal. •The two accused sought to rely, in their application for discharge, on the second element, which is, they argued that an ingredient of the evidence of committing the crime was missing: in other words, they are arguing that indeed fraud, deception and misrepresentation occurred, but was not occasioned by them personally, but by companies that won the tenders. •The accused’s lawyer argued that the accused did not influence the award of the bid, may have participated by signing contracts after the award, but that is neither here nor there, making their involvement post facto. They further argued that the state dealt with a corporate entity, not an individual. The state would have to pierce the corporate veil through an application to that effect to get to Mpofu and Chimombe. This is where it gets more interesting. •The judge delves into the issue of the corporate veil in criminal matters in detail. He explains that the effect of section 277 of the criminal code and reform act is to remove the corporate veil that exists in common law on criminal issues relating to companies. It’s very important for employees and directors to grasp these aspects of the law. The judge also touches on aspects of vicarious liability. •The companies act and criminal code were modified a lot in the last ten years. Most people are not aware of this. •Watch the hearing and ruling and educate yourself. Busisa Moyo Tawanda Nyambirai @tino_chinyoka1 Retired Elder Rex M.E Midzi

mmatigari

20,172 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Aidan Kearney has told witnesses that they won’t be able to leave their homes, that they need to “tell the truth,” that their lives will be destroyed, that he’s never going to stop, that everyone will know their names, and that they will forever be labeled murderers. These are witnesses in a murder trial. Yet I continue to see content creators and some lawyers claim that this is protected by the First Amendment. I see them support him and fundraise for him. So I have a genuine question: How is threatening witnesses with public ruin, telling them their lives will be destroyed, and warning them they will be branded murderers if they don’t speak up considered protected speech? You have said it’s protected speech. You support him. So please explain. No insults. No name-calling. No changing the subject. IDC what you think about these particular witnesses. Just explain how threatening or pressuring WITNESSES in a murder trial is protected by the First Amendment. TY. Rebecca Lavoie Defense Diaries Emily See Mel Barrett🏳️‍🌈 (she/her/they) SparklyRabbit444RN Jimmy Jessica Machado The Broken Baker Ian Runkle/Runkle of the Bailey @ YouTube Andrea Burkhart 🐟🐟🐟🐟🏴‍☠️ David Yannetti Lisa Elizabeth Brother Counsel Nurse_Kim CONTEXT:
11:30

Aidan Kearney has told witnesses that they won’t be able to leave their homes, that they need to “tell the truth,” that their lives will be destroyed, that he’s never going to stop, that everyone will know their names, and that they will forever be labeled murderers. These are witnesses in a murder trial. Yet I continue to see content creators and some lawyers claim that this is protected by the First Amendment. I see them support him and fundraise for him. So I have a genuine question: How is threatening witnesses with public ruin, telling them their lives will be destroyed, and warning them they will be branded murderers if they don’t speak up considered protected speech? You have said it’s protected speech. You support him. So please explain. No insults. No name-calling. No changing the subject. IDC what you think about these particular witnesses. Just explain how threatening or pressuring WITNESSES in a murder trial is protected by the First Amendment. TY. Rebecca Lavoie Defense Diaries Emily See Mel Barrett🏳️‍🌈 (she/her/they) SparklyRabbit444RN Jimmy Jessica Machado The Broken Baker Ian Runkle/Runkle of the Bailey @ YouTube Andrea Burkhart 🐟🐟🐟🐟🏴‍☠️ David Yannetti Lisa Elizabeth Brother Counsel Nurse_Kim CONTEXT:

Mama Llama

16,979 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

It is funny how the same people who repeatedly claim that their vote to archive the impeachment complaint of Sara Zimmerman Duterte was rooted from their respect for the Supreme Court are the same ones who cry foul when Rodrigo Roa Duterte was arrested. Congressman Zia Alonto Adiong pointed out that the Duterte bloc and the majority of Senators only respect the Supreme Court ruling only when it is convenient. When it favors their principal — Sara Zimmerman Duterte. The House of Representatives are merely exhausting all legal remedies to protect the power granted to them by the 1987 Constitution. The Supreme Court ruled in Pangilinan et al vs. Cayetano et. all that the ICC has jurisdiction in supposed crimes committed before the Philippines from the ICC (G.R. No. 238875). It is important to note that the cases included in the Crimes Against Humanity case of Rodrigo Roa Duterte were within the time/ date we’re still a member of the International Criminal Court. Now that the Duterte Bloc and the majority of Senators said that they made their decision out of respect to the Supreme Court —- are they finally going to respect this too? Lols
1:40

It is funny how the same people who repeatedly claim that their vote to archive the impeachment complaint of Sara Zimmerman Duterte was rooted from their respect for the Supreme Court are the same ones who cry foul when Rodrigo Roa Duterte was arrested. Congressman Zia Alonto Adiong pointed out that the Duterte bloc and the majority of Senators only respect the Supreme Court ruling only when it is convenient. When it favors their principal — Sara Zimmerman Duterte. The House of Representatives are merely exhausting all legal remedies to protect the power granted to them by the 1987 Constitution. The Supreme Court ruled in Pangilinan et al vs. Cayetano et. all that the ICC has jurisdiction in supposed crimes committed before the Philippines from the ICC (G.R. No. 238875). It is important to note that the cases included in the Crimes Against Humanity case of Rodrigo Roa Duterte were within the time/ date we’re still a member of the International Criminal Court. Now that the Duterte Bloc and the majority of Senators said that they made their decision out of respect to the Supreme Court —- are they finally going to respect this too? Lols

Just

41,847 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Is it wrong for me to say that I agree with Dr. Phil here? With that said hindsight is 20/20. We didn’t know how the virus would impact kids at the time. It turned out that the impact to children was far less than the impact to adults, and especially elderly adults. "When they shut it down, they stopped the mandated reporters from being able to see children that were being abused and molested, and in fact sent them home and abandoned them to their abusers." "They suffered and will suffer more from the mismanagement of covid than they will from the exposure to covid. And that's not an opinion. That's a fact."
1:10

Is it wrong for me to say that I agree with Dr. Phil here? With that said hindsight is 20/20. We didn’t know how the virus would impact kids at the time. It turned out that the impact to children was far less than the impact to adults, and especially elderly adults. "When they shut it down, they stopped the mandated reporters from being able to see children that were being abused and molested, and in fact sent them home and abandoned them to their abusers." "They suffered and will suffer more from the mismanagement of covid than they will from the exposure to covid. And that's not an opinion. That's a fact."

Brian Krassenstein

1,893,043 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

The McAlberts have desperately tried to rewrite history by claiming that the crowds outside supporting Karen Read were violent, unruly, and threatening. They claim in their lawsuit that supporters shouted at them, calling them murderers as they entered the court DURING the trial. This never happened, as there was a strictly enforced buffer zone, and all of the witnesses came into the courthouse heavily protected by police. But even before there was a buffer zone this is typically what Jen McCabe went through on her way into court with the O'Keefe family - silence.
0:20

The McAlberts have desperately tried to rewrite history by claiming that the crowds outside supporting Karen Read were violent, unruly, and threatening. They claim in their lawsuit that supporters shouted at them, calling them murderers as they entered the court DURING the trial. This never happened, as there was a strictly enforced buffer zone, and all of the witnesses came into the courthouse heavily protected by police. But even before there was a buffer zone this is typically what Jen McCabe went through on her way into court with the O'Keefe family - silence.

Aidan Kearney

36,451 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

#Biafrans and all the lovers of freedom, I do not want to comment or interfere on this interview or so called press conferences carried out at the back of “Mama put “ street food . A whole #MNK case press conference was conducted at a corner of a street restaurant with plastic chairs , does it mean there is no office or the lawyers do not have offices again? Some fools might say am not a lawyer, honestly, “una shameful display de shame me and Biafrans worldwide”. Anyhow , everyone should keep this video in an archive for future reference. Listen to these statements from #MNK’s lawyer , it’s a red flag for me and this call for concern . If a lawyer who is considered as the lead consul for #MNK is now telling the world that the #DSS took picture of him on a visit to MNK and later mistakenly presented as an exhibit in the court , that means “church agbasala” . For me I totally disagree that the DSS presented the pictures mistakenly. There is more to that picture for them to present it to the court as an exhibit , sooner or later we shall know. Don’t forget if there are pictures exhibits , there are also audio conversation that DSS will want to use to nail #MNK , even the lawyer is not safe when the trial commences, he made himself an errand boy for an infiltrator because of greed for money , I told them to be careful in order not to implicate MNK out of their evil intentions to destroy the #DOS , they were all bouncing up and down like a table tennis ball , abusing me blackmailing men who have paid heavy price for this struggle . They were planning how to dissolve the DOS and announce their own leadership whom they want to use to finally destroy #IPOB as they’re desperate for a deal, not minding putting the lives of millions Of Biafrans in jeopardy because of their selfish interest . Today, he is telling the world that MNK won’t get justice from the Nigeria court , same court they have blackmail many us and others for maintaining our stand that no more trial for #MNK . They have succeeded in rubbishing themselves and the case of #MNK . All their blackmail and evil plans against this struggle and IPOB leadership is now stirring them on their faces and in the coming weeks their evil plans will manifest openly . They should know that #MNK will regain his freedom but not from all these their backstabbing , begging , greed and shenanigans. All their noisy approach is based on greed and selfish interest. What they don’t know is all their evil moves were captured by the DSS just to nail them and many others and they stupidly fail to the #DSS traps . Directorate Of State (DOS) IPOB Liverpool Central IPOB In United Kingdom. 🌅 IPOB Zürich Radio Biafra #IPOB
1:52

#Biafrans and all the lovers of freedom, I do not want to comment or interfere on this interview or so called press conferences carried out at the back of “Mama put “ street food . A whole #MNK case press conference was conducted at a corner of a street restaurant with plastic chairs , does it mean there is no office or the lawyers do not have offices again? Some fools might say am not a lawyer, honestly, “una shameful display de shame me and Biafrans worldwide”. Anyhow , everyone should keep this video in an archive for future reference. Listen to these statements from #MNK’s lawyer , it’s a red flag for me and this call for concern . If a lawyer who is considered as the lead consul for #MNK is now telling the world that the #DSS took picture of him on a visit to MNK and later mistakenly presented as an exhibit in the court , that means “church agbasala” . For me I totally disagree that the DSS presented the pictures mistakenly. There is more to that picture for them to present it to the court as an exhibit , sooner or later we shall know. Don’t forget if there are pictures exhibits , there are also audio conversation that DSS will want to use to nail #MNK , even the lawyer is not safe when the trial commences, he made himself an errand boy for an infiltrator because of greed for money , I told them to be careful in order not to implicate MNK out of their evil intentions to destroy the #DOS , they were all bouncing up and down like a table tennis ball , abusing me blackmailing men who have paid heavy price for this struggle . They were planning how to dissolve the DOS and announce their own leadership whom they want to use to finally destroy #IPOB as they’re desperate for a deal, not minding putting the lives of millions Of Biafrans in jeopardy because of their selfish interest . Today, he is telling the world that MNK won’t get justice from the Nigeria court , same court they have blackmail many us and others for maintaining our stand that no more trial for #MNK . They have succeeded in rubbishing themselves and the case of #MNK . All their blackmail and evil plans against this struggle and IPOB leadership is now stirring them on their faces and in the coming weeks their evil plans will manifest openly . They should know that #MNK will regain his freedom but not from all these their backstabbing , begging , greed and shenanigans. All their noisy approach is based on greed and selfish interest. What they don’t know is all their evil moves were captured by the DSS just to nail them and many others and they stupidly fail to the #DSS traps . Directorate Of State (DOS) IPOB Liverpool Central IPOB In United Kingdom. 🌅 IPOB Zürich Radio Biafra #IPOB

Chinasa Nworu

14,894 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Zoe Gardener on asylum seekers, "People are being moved out of a hotel where there were violent racist protests taking place week in week outside of their gates" "People being terrorised who were living there, a huge disturbance to the local community" "Yes, its right people should not have been housed in that hotel but for it to happen in this way, what an enormous humiliation for this government" "A huge failure which lays bear the arrogance with which they have approached this asylum issue" "Labour have gone day after day after day this summer pursuing anti migrant rhetoric over their social media, their announcements, across all of their policy approaches" "Labour have fuelled the flames of this hatred" "What they should have been doing is acting sooner to moving people out of hotels and into a more sustainable community accommodation" "What if we allowed people to work while they are in the asylum system, as they do across Europe, so that they can pay to support themselves in private rental accommodation" "It is not illegal to enter the UK to seek asylum" "And in every other European country they are entitled to work while their claims are being assessed" "They are not breaking the law by being here, it is clear under international law they have a right to be here and claim asylum" "Under this privatised system of asylum accommodation where people own, as you say, poor quality hard to let properties. That's not the right model" "We should have a not for profit model of asylum accommodation where people are house through local authorities, where they are able to work in order to support their own accommodation" "It is insulting the intelligence of viewers that they can simply be made to disappear" "We're already seeing the violent far right racist organised parts of those demonstrations, those people are saying this was a success, saying that if they create a space that is unsafe outside these hotels, if they create disorder, they will have to move asylum seekers out" "And they are threatening to do it all over the country"
4:22

Zoe Gardener on asylum seekers, "People are being moved out of a hotel where there were violent racist protests taking place week in week outside of their gates" "People being terrorised who were living there, a huge disturbance to the local community" "Yes, its right people should not have been housed in that hotel but for it to happen in this way, what an enormous humiliation for this government" "A huge failure which lays bear the arrogance with which they have approached this asylum issue" "Labour have gone day after day after day this summer pursuing anti migrant rhetoric over their social media, their announcements, across all of their policy approaches" "Labour have fuelled the flames of this hatred" "What they should have been doing is acting sooner to moving people out of hotels and into a more sustainable community accommodation" "What if we allowed people to work while they are in the asylum system, as they do across Europe, so that they can pay to support themselves in private rental accommodation" "It is not illegal to enter the UK to seek asylum" "And in every other European country they are entitled to work while their claims are being assessed" "They are not breaking the law by being here, it is clear under international law they have a right to be here and claim asylum" "Under this privatised system of asylum accommodation where people own, as you say, poor quality hard to let properties. That's not the right model" "We should have a not for profit model of asylum accommodation where people are house through local authorities, where they are able to work in order to support their own accommodation" "It is insulting the intelligence of viewers that they can simply be made to disappear" "We're already seeing the violent far right racist organised parts of those demonstrations, those people are saying this was a success, saying that if they create a space that is unsafe outside these hotels, if they create disorder, they will have to move asylum seekers out" "And they are threatening to do it all over the country"

Farrukh

163,695 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

#WATCH | Advocate Dinesh Jotwani, representing a petitioner, says, "Today, the judges were very clear and they addressed NTA - assist the court, don't think that it is your client, don't make it as an adversarial proceeding, this is not student vs NTA, even if they find 0.001% anything happening NTA officials should be taken to task, there should be nothing that should be hidden. So, matter was posted for July 8 when the main petition will come up. But at this point of time, the Court was very clear and they did not give NTA an opportunity. They said, you have to file a reply but be very clear that you have to assist the court in this."
0:57

#WATCH | Advocate Dinesh Jotwani, representing a petitioner, says, "Today, the judges were very clear and they addressed NTA - assist the court, don't think that it is your client, don't make it as an adversarial proceeding, this is not student vs NTA, even if they find 0.001% anything happening NTA officials should be taken to task, there should be nothing that should be hidden. So, matter was posted for July 8 when the main petition will come up. But at this point of time, the Court was very clear and they did not give NTA an opportunity. They said, you have to file a reply but be very clear that you have to assist the court in this."

ANI

58,731 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

The main reason for America's defeat in #Afghanistan was #Pakistan 🇵🇰 This is an interview during the Afghan-American war 📢 American Captain John Hintz, who was deployed on the Afghan-Pakistani border, is describing the war situation. He says: If we take an area from them, we know they will not stop or come back. These non-Afghan fighters are very strong, they have more modern weapons than us and are much more numerous than us. When we fight them, we really know who we are fighting. The presenter asks: When you talk about non-Afghan fighters, where do they come from? Captain: Pakistan. We are only twelve to thirteen miles from Pakistan. If we kill thirty of their fighters in one day, it doesn't matter to them, they come back in even greater numbers the next day. Presenter: Are these fighters sincere in their purpose? (Captain: Surprised) Of all the battles I've fought, these are the ones most connected to my purpose!
0:50

The main reason for America's defeat in #Afghanistan was #Pakistan 🇵🇰 This is an interview during the Afghan-American war 📢 American Captain John Hintz, who was deployed on the Afghan-Pakistani border, is describing the war situation. He says: If we take an area from them, we know they will not stop or come back. These non-Afghan fighters are very strong, they have more modern weapons than us and are much more numerous than us. When we fight them, we really know who we are fighting. The presenter asks: When you talk about non-Afghan fighters, where do they come from? Captain: Pakistan. We are only twelve to thirteen miles from Pakistan. If we kill thirty of their fighters in one day, it doesn't matter to them, they come back in even greater numbers the next day. Presenter: Are these fighters sincere in their purpose? (Captain: Surprised) Of all the battles I've fought, these are the ones most connected to my purpose!

Voice Of Bangladeshi Muslims 🇧🇩

18,881 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

'In Europe, people are told that Uncle Putin will catch them during an evening walk in Paris or Berlin. This is a military psychosis' – Orban. 'I have the feeling that they would already like to get rid of this burden, but they have become so engrossed in this war that now they cannot. Moreover, it was they themselves who tempted, even pushed Ukraine towards war. And even quite recently, it was they who tried to hinder the peace initiatives of the American president. They have deceived their own citizens to such an extent with tales that "the Russians are coming," that "Uncle Putin will catch you in the evening" somewhere in Paris or Berlin, that now it is very difficult for them to get out of this military psychosis, out of this atmosphere of war, and simply say: "Oh, sorry, the Russians are not going to conquer us at all." - SK
0:56

'In Europe, people are told that Uncle Putin will catch them during an evening walk in Paris or Berlin. This is a military psychosis' – Orban. 'I have the feeling that they would already like to get rid of this burden, but they have become so engrossed in this war that now they cannot. Moreover, it was they themselves who tempted, even pushed Ukraine towards war. And even quite recently, it was they who tried to hinder the peace initiatives of the American president. They have deceived their own citizens to such an extent with tales that "the Russians are coming," that "Uncle Putin will catch you in the evening" somewhere in Paris or Berlin, that now it is very difficult for them to get out of this military psychosis, out of this atmosphere of war, and simply say: "Oh, sorry, the Russians are not going to conquer us at all." - SK

Zlatti71

45,583 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Election experts asked to audit ES&S and Dominion voting machines that are used across the U.S. in our elections, hosting a testing plan in conjunction with the Secretary of State of California. The companies approved... Multiple staggering vulnerabilities were found that gave hackers REMOTE ACCESS at the highest levels allowing them to change and alter anything in the election that they wanted. When the election companies that agreed to the testing found out that the experts testing the machines weren't using their specific guidelines that ES&S wanted them to use and ended up finding these massive vulnerabilities, they stopped the audit, and told them that they will finish the audit with their own testers. They found the same in Dominion, with operating patches also missing, which means an attacker can inject code into the system, and execute that with the possibility of receiving control, allowing anything, once again to be changed in an election. As soon as these vulnerabilities were exposed, the election companies stopped the tests. This should tell you everything you need to know. 3 companies basically run all the elections in the U.S., Dominion/Liberty Vote, ES&S, and Hart InterCivic. The problem is that all their systems and inner workings are proprietary, and these vendors are preventing auditors from looking at their code, and if this is what is going to be running our elections? Than this is a HUGE problem.
5:18

Election experts asked to audit ES&S and Dominion voting machines that are used across the U.S. in our elections, hosting a testing plan in conjunction with the Secretary of State of California. The companies approved... Multiple staggering vulnerabilities were found that gave hackers REMOTE ACCESS at the highest levels allowing them to change and alter anything in the election that they wanted. When the election companies that agreed to the testing found out that the experts testing the machines weren't using their specific guidelines that ES&S wanted them to use and ended up finding these massive vulnerabilities, they stopped the audit, and told them that they will finish the audit with their own testers. They found the same in Dominion, with operating patches also missing, which means an attacker can inject code into the system, and execute that with the possibility of receiving control, allowing anything, once again to be changed in an election. As soon as these vulnerabilities were exposed, the election companies stopped the tests. This should tell you everything you need to know. 3 companies basically run all the elections in the U.S., Dominion/Liberty Vote, ES&S, and Hart InterCivic. The problem is that all their systems and inner workings are proprietary, and these vendors are preventing auditors from looking at their code, and if this is what is going to be running our elections? Than this is a HUGE problem.

The SCIF

18,029 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce