Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

When Dboss exposed the reality, people laughed. Today Bigg Boss itself became the proof. Host = Puppet 🤡 Truth = Edited Justice = TRP 🤦 Kichcha Sudeepa #BBK12 ali idid maryade kuda oytu ninge 😂🐕 Better retire from BB too 💯 Is This BigBoss or Big lie? 🤥 #Gilli #kavyashree

gaja_thoogudeep's profile picture

Gaja Thoogudeepa

1,736 subscribers

13,787 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

#BBK12#Gilli#kavyashree
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

I’m sorry Chris, respectfully I have to push back that Pierre and the Conservatives haven't been Truth Tellers and that's why they are losing to Liberals and here's why. First of all, you’re assuming the majority of Canadians want the truth. I don’t think the last decade supports that. Canadians re-elected Trudeau after the WE scandal, the Chinese Communist Party's election interference, SNC-Lavalin, SDTC, blackface, the Emergencies Act, the freezing of bank accounts, a litany of ethics violations from his cabinet across the board and now the controversy around Carney’s Brookfield ties. That doesn’t show a public deeply committed to truth, earnestness, accountability, or political honesty or perhaps knowledge. If those things truly drove voters, this government would’ve been finished years ago. I respect what you’ve done to expose serious issues. That matters. But I think it’s a mistake to assume most people vote on truth or principle. Most don’t. They move when the consequences become personal. Political change usually happens when people feel enough pain in their own lives that they can’t ignore it anymore. The truth has already been available. The scandals have already been exposed. The warnings have already been given. That still wasn’t enough. That’s why I don’t think the main problem is a lack of truth tellers. We’ve had them for years, including you, and all of you have been demonized on mainstream media platforms for this deceitfully, so you should already have a sense of how much Truth Tellers get go unheard or just vilified. The deeper problem is that too many people prefer comfort, habit, and easy promises over hard truths and painful remedies. That’s the point Socrates gets at in Plato’s Gorgias: people prefer the candy seller to the doctor, at least until the sickness becomes impossible to ignore. This won’t be solved simply by telling the truth better. For many people, reality itself will have to become painful enough to force the change. Vesper
1:27

I’m sorry Chris, respectfully I have to push back that Pierre and the Conservatives haven't been Truth Tellers and that's why they are losing to Liberals and here's why. First of all, you’re assuming the majority of Canadians want the truth. I don’t think the last decade supports that. Canadians re-elected Trudeau after the WE scandal, the Chinese Communist Party's election interference, SNC-Lavalin, SDTC, blackface, the Emergencies Act, the freezing of bank accounts, a litany of ethics violations from his cabinet across the board and now the controversy around Carney’s Brookfield ties. That doesn’t show a public deeply committed to truth, earnestness, accountability, or political honesty or perhaps knowledge. If those things truly drove voters, this government would’ve been finished years ago. I respect what you’ve done to expose serious issues. That matters. But I think it’s a mistake to assume most people vote on truth or principle. Most don’t. They move when the consequences become personal. Political change usually happens when people feel enough pain in their own lives that they can’t ignore it anymore. The truth has already been available. The scandals have already been exposed. The warnings have already been given. That still wasn’t enough. That’s why I don’t think the main problem is a lack of truth tellers. We’ve had them for years, including you, and all of you have been demonized on mainstream media platforms for this deceitfully, so you should already have a sense of how much Truth Tellers get go unheard or just vilified. The deeper problem is that too many people prefer comfort, habit, and easy promises over hard truths and painful remedies. That’s the point Socrates gets at in Plato’s Gorgias: people prefer the candy seller to the doctor, at least until the sickness becomes impossible to ignore. This won’t be solved simply by telling the truth better. For many people, reality itself will have to become painful enough to force the change. Vesper

Vesper

21,903 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

ZIMBABWE, STAND UP. Before it’s too late. Today, we remind you of a truth swept under the carpet. In 2021, The Sentry report “Shadows and Shell Games” exposed how businessman Kudakwashe Tagwirei built a vast offshore empire, powered by government deals, military connections, and secretive shell companies across the Cayman Islands, Mauritius, and South Africa. This wasn’t business. This was state capture in motion. Human rights lawyer Beatrice Mtetwa petitioned the Nicole Tomorrow We had the proof, over 40 companies across mining, oil, banking, and logistics, all tied to Tagwirei. But nothing happened. President President of Zimbabwe knew. He did nothing. And when Justice Loice Matanda-Moyo, ZACC’s Chairperson, moved to act, she was removed, for daring to pursue the untouchable. And now, it’s worse. Reports suggest Tagwirei is plotting to remove Vice President Chiwenga, one of the few senior officials who has spoken out against looting. This is not politics. This is a hostile takeover of Zimbabwe by stolen wealth. Tagwirei wants to buy the Presidency. With your gold. Your oil. Your silence. So we ask: Will we allow thieves to hijack our nation? Or will we say no to corruption, to betrayal, and to silence? If Tagwirei wins, justice dies. And Zimbabwe becomes a hollow shell ruled by plunderers. We are progressive officials inside ZACC, breaking the silence. Because we owe the people the truth. Share this. Speak out. Stand up. Zimbabwe deserves better. Zimbabwe Republic Police Ministry of Information, Publicity & Broadcasting Ministry of Justice, Legal & Parliamentary Affairs The Herald Zimbabwe NewsDay Zimbabwe TheNewsHawks
2:22

ZIMBABWE, STAND UP. Before it’s too late. Today, we remind you of a truth swept under the carpet. In 2021, The Sentry report “Shadows and Shell Games” exposed how businessman Kudakwashe Tagwirei built a vast offshore empire, powered by government deals, military connections, and secretive shell companies across the Cayman Islands, Mauritius, and South Africa. This wasn’t business. This was state capture in motion. Human rights lawyer Beatrice Mtetwa petitioned the Nicole Tomorrow We had the proof, over 40 companies across mining, oil, banking, and logistics, all tied to Tagwirei. But nothing happened. President President of Zimbabwe knew. He did nothing. And when Justice Loice Matanda-Moyo, ZACC’s Chairperson, moved to act, she was removed, for daring to pursue the untouchable. And now, it’s worse. Reports suggest Tagwirei is plotting to remove Vice President Chiwenga, one of the few senior officials who has spoken out against looting. This is not politics. This is a hostile takeover of Zimbabwe by stolen wealth. Tagwirei wants to buy the Presidency. With your gold. Your oil. Your silence. So we ask: Will we allow thieves to hijack our nation? Or will we say no to corruption, to betrayal, and to silence? If Tagwirei wins, justice dies. And Zimbabwe becomes a hollow shell ruled by plunderers. We are progressive officials inside ZACC, breaking the silence. Because we owe the people the truth. Share this. Speak out. Stand up. Zimbabwe deserves better. Zimbabwe Republic Police Ministry of Information, Publicity & Broadcasting Ministry of Justice, Legal & Parliamentary Affairs The Herald Zimbabwe NewsDay Zimbabwe TheNewsHawks

Ras Ngugi | AWAKE AT DAWN

25,287 просмотров • 1 год назад

Oh, really? So now you suddenly care about the Albanian people? The same Albanian people whose institutions, public services and digital infrastructure were the target of a cyberterror campaign that aimed to cripple an entire country, and which international investigations have traced back to actors linked to and supported by your regime. We know those fingerprints all too well. We know the methods. We know the threats. And we know that what has driven your hostility toward Albania has never been Zionism, nor any other convenient slogan of your despicable propaganda. It is your hostility toward freedom itself. You cannot forgive Albania for doing what Albanians do: opening their doors to people fleeing persecution. You cannot forgive Albania for giving shelter to Iranian men and women whom you sought to silence through intimidation, imprisonment and death simply because they dare to think differently, speak differently or dream differently. But we are Albanians. We do not abandon people who knock on our door seeking protection from oppression. We did not do so when Jews fleeing Nazi persecution needed refuge. We became the only country in Europe with more Jews after World War II than before it. And we will not let down the Iranians who seek safety from intimidation, persecution or assassination. Nor will we yield to your desperate and relentless cyberattacks. After your major assault, we built a resilient, state-of-the-art cyber shield that has made Albania far stronger and far better prepared to confront your desperate cyberattacks that continue with no success. You are free to use the privileges of open societies to spread your false narratives, your shameless accusations and your brutal threats. But as we Albanians learned from fifty years of darkness under our atheocratic dictatorship, propaganda can conceal the truth, distort the truth and postpone the truth, but it can never bury the truth not even under the weight of a medieval theocracy like yours. Your regime can hack networks, imprison critics, censor voices, threaten opponents, bully neighbours and manufacture endless excuses for its failures. But it cannot escape reality forever. Regimes built on fear, censorship, repression and the crushing of dissent may endure for a time, but history is merciless toward those who wage war against their own people's freedom and prosperity. The Iranian people deserve freedom. They deserve dignity. They deserve the right to speak without fear. And Albania will never apologize, never retreat and never be intimidated for standing on the side of those values. So keep manipulating and deceiving whoever in the colourful West is willing to fall for your falsehoods. But you will never make Albanians enemies of peoples - whether Jews, Arabs or Americans. Because what they share, and what you fear, is the very things you have denied your own nation for far too long: Great hopes, big dreams and the determination to live free, to seek peace and to relentlessly build prosperity🇦🇱🤝🇮🇱🤝🇦🇪🤝🇶🇦🤝🇸🇦🤝🇺🇸
1:17

Oh, really? So now you suddenly care about the Albanian people? The same Albanian people whose institutions, public services and digital infrastructure were the target of a cyberterror campaign that aimed to cripple an entire country, and which international investigations have traced back to actors linked to and supported by your regime. We know those fingerprints all too well. We know the methods. We know the threats. And we know that what has driven your hostility toward Albania has never been Zionism, nor any other convenient slogan of your despicable propaganda. It is your hostility toward freedom itself. You cannot forgive Albania for doing what Albanians do: opening their doors to people fleeing persecution. You cannot forgive Albania for giving shelter to Iranian men and women whom you sought to silence through intimidation, imprisonment and death simply because they dare to think differently, speak differently or dream differently. But we are Albanians. We do not abandon people who knock on our door seeking protection from oppression. We did not do so when Jews fleeing Nazi persecution needed refuge. We became the only country in Europe with more Jews after World War II than before it. And we will not let down the Iranians who seek safety from intimidation, persecution or assassination. Nor will we yield to your desperate and relentless cyberattacks. After your major assault, we built a resilient, state-of-the-art cyber shield that has made Albania far stronger and far better prepared to confront your desperate cyberattacks that continue with no success. You are free to use the privileges of open societies to spread your false narratives, your shameless accusations and your brutal threats. But as we Albanians learned from fifty years of darkness under our atheocratic dictatorship, propaganda can conceal the truth, distort the truth and postpone the truth, but it can never bury the truth not even under the weight of a medieval theocracy like yours. Your regime can hack networks, imprison critics, censor voices, threaten opponents, bully neighbours and manufacture endless excuses for its failures. But it cannot escape reality forever. Regimes built on fear, censorship, repression and the crushing of dissent may endure for a time, but history is merciless toward those who wage war against their own people's freedom and prosperity. The Iranian people deserve freedom. They deserve dignity. They deserve the right to speak without fear. And Albania will never apologize, never retreat and never be intimidated for standing on the side of those values. So keep manipulating and deceiving whoever in the colourful West is willing to fall for your falsehoods. But you will never make Albanians enemies of peoples - whether Jews, Arabs or Americans. Because what they share, and what you fear, is the very things you have denied your own nation for far too long: Great hopes, big dreams and the determination to live free, to seek peace and to relentlessly build prosperity🇦🇱🤝🇮🇱🤝🇦🇪🤝🇶🇦🤝🇸🇦🤝🇺🇸

Edi Rama

189,865 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

To CNN International and to all the endless media outlets, big and small, together with all the well-meaning content producers of Facebook, X, Instagram, TikTok and every other platform that now shapes the global conversation, I would very much wish to pass the following post: As we speak, today’s protest has drawn roughly 2,000 participants. It is the lowest turnout so far, but even at its peak, participation never exceeded 8,000 people. So how is it that what much of the world has seen over the past days appears so enormous, so dramatic, so overwhelming? At some point, when the engineered digital hysteria of these days has passed and emotions have cooled, the democratic world should take a closer look at how the gap between reality and its representation became so vast. Not merely as a matter of this particular case, but as a symptom of something much larger. How could a tiny country become global news for reasons so disconnected from the reality on the ground? How could a local protest involving a few thousand people be transformed into an international spectacle? How could assumptions become facts, narratives become verdicts, and speculation become accepted truth before the basic facts were even established? And perhaps most importantly, what does it say about our information ecosystem when perception can travel around the world faster than reality itself? Because the reality is that there is no project yet. There is no building permit yet. There is no construction yet. There is not even a final design yet. There is only a vision and a plan: to transform Albania into the most attractive high-end tourism destination in this part of the world, while creating a net positive environmental development that, according to the current vision, would ultimately result in approximately 25% more trees and green space than exists today, alongside measurable improvements across multiple biodiversity indicators. The ambition is not merely to build. The ambition is to demonstrate that development and environmental enhancement can go hand in hand. That is precisely why some of the world’s leading experts in ecology, biodiversity, landscape architecture, environmental engineering and sustainable tourism are working on these concepts and parameters. Whether they succeed or fail is a matter for future assessment, science, public scrutiny and transparent debate. But presenting as an environmental catastrophe something that does not yet exist, has not yet been designed, has not yet been permitted, and whose stated objective is in fact to produce positive environmental outcomes, is not a serious contribution to public discussion. And yet, from this simple reality emerged a hurricane of digital hysteria, apocalyptic headlines, manufactured outrage and sweeping conclusions presented as established facts. Along the way came deepfakes, manipulated images, fabricated claims, coordinated amplification, anonymous networks and online behaviour that bears many of the characteristics of the hybrid information warfare that increasingly shapes public debate across democratic societies. Even more remarkably, social media platforms recorded an explosion in activity around this topic, with Albanian-language engagement increasing several-fold within just a few days. A significant part of this sudden surge appears to have been driven not by an organic expansion of public participation, but by the rapid proliferation of newly created profiles, anonymous accounts and pages with little or no identifiable history, raising legitimate questions about artificial amplification and the manufacturing of digital momentum.
0:56

To CNN International and to all the endless media outlets, big and small, together with all the well-meaning content producers of Facebook, X, Instagram, TikTok and every other platform that now shapes the global conversation, I would very much wish to pass the following post: As we speak, today’s protest has drawn roughly 2,000 participants. It is the lowest turnout so far, but even at its peak, participation never exceeded 8,000 people. So how is it that what much of the world has seen over the past days appears so enormous, so dramatic, so overwhelming? At some point, when the engineered digital hysteria of these days has passed and emotions have cooled, the democratic world should take a closer look at how the gap between reality and its representation became so vast. Not merely as a matter of this particular case, but as a symptom of something much larger. How could a tiny country become global news for reasons so disconnected from the reality on the ground? How could a local protest involving a few thousand people be transformed into an international spectacle? How could assumptions become facts, narratives become verdicts, and speculation become accepted truth before the basic facts were even established? And perhaps most importantly, what does it say about our information ecosystem when perception can travel around the world faster than reality itself? Because the reality is that there is no project yet. There is no building permit yet. There is no construction yet. There is not even a final design yet. There is only a vision and a plan: to transform Albania into the most attractive high-end tourism destination in this part of the world, while creating a net positive environmental development that, according to the current vision, would ultimately result in approximately 25% more trees and green space than exists today, alongside measurable improvements across multiple biodiversity indicators. The ambition is not merely to build. The ambition is to demonstrate that development and environmental enhancement can go hand in hand. That is precisely why some of the world’s leading experts in ecology, biodiversity, landscape architecture, environmental engineering and sustainable tourism are working on these concepts and parameters. Whether they succeed or fail is a matter for future assessment, science, public scrutiny and transparent debate. But presenting as an environmental catastrophe something that does not yet exist, has not yet been designed, has not yet been permitted, and whose stated objective is in fact to produce positive environmental outcomes, is not a serious contribution to public discussion. And yet, from this simple reality emerged a hurricane of digital hysteria, apocalyptic headlines, manufactured outrage and sweeping conclusions presented as established facts. Along the way came deepfakes, manipulated images, fabricated claims, coordinated amplification, anonymous networks and online behaviour that bears many of the characteristics of the hybrid information warfare that increasingly shapes public debate across democratic societies. Even more remarkably, social media platforms recorded an explosion in activity around this topic, with Albanian-language engagement increasing several-fold within just a few days. A significant part of this sudden surge appears to have been driven not by an organic expansion of public participation, but by the rapid proliferation of newly created profiles, anonymous accounts and pages with little or no identifiable history, raising legitimate questions about artificial amplification and the manufacturing of digital momentum.

Edi Rama

211,711 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Yesterday Heather laughed at the news that Michael laws was running for NZ First. “He’s bad news, NZ First have made a mistake.. he’s fringe” Today Laws had an interview with Heather and handled her like the pro he is. Her conceited laughing stopped once he clearly and logically answered her banal questioning. HDA : “I don’t think you will be good in parliament as you have too much baggage, people wont vote for you” Laws : “ Then explain why i’m the top polling Councillor in Otago. Also you have plenty of baggage too, we all do it’s proof you’ve lived life” HDA : “Why go back into Politics, I think it’s a mistake, you push the rules too much, you know it’s not the kinda thing people want to see in Parliament” Laws: “You have got to be joking, I’m not going to wellington to eat my lunch, if you want to maintain the status quo nothing will change, you may as well be a public servant. This is the time for real and significant reform in this country, NZF are going to change things, we will change the stays quo and break the system” Laws has been a Govt Policy advisor, an MP, a Mayor, Councillor for many years in three councils, historian, University lecturer, award winning columnist with 3 national papers, a talk back host with 4 different stations….. pretty impressive. Heather has moved from South Africa to NZ, went to polytech, hitched up with her boss who is 30 years older and now is on a lame stream, controlled, commercial ridden talking head show. Hardly impressive. HDA in the lead up to the last election repeatedly (along with Hoskings) told listeners in MSM moron land that Luxon should rule out NZF or Winston will either go with Labour or be a destabilising force and not allow Luxon to make the big changes. Heather doesn’t actually know much about politics, scratch her and find a pretty woke progressive beholden by the establishment (listen to her interniew with Laws nemeses Ken Mair in the quoted post to see exactly what I mean). HDA is a defender of the very system Laws and NZ First will shake up, and the smug smirk will be wiped off her face soon enough. Laws vs Tame next please, I’d pay to watch that. listen here :
6:32

Yesterday Heather laughed at the news that Michael laws was running for NZ First. “He’s bad news, NZ First have made a mistake.. he’s fringe” Today Laws had an interview with Heather and handled her like the pro he is. Her conceited laughing stopped once he clearly and logically answered her banal questioning. HDA : “I don’t think you will be good in parliament as you have too much baggage, people wont vote for you” Laws : “ Then explain why i’m the top polling Councillor in Otago. Also you have plenty of baggage too, we all do it’s proof you’ve lived life” HDA : “Why go back into Politics, I think it’s a mistake, you push the rules too much, you know it’s not the kinda thing people want to see in Parliament” Laws: “You have got to be joking, I’m not going to wellington to eat my lunch, if you want to maintain the status quo nothing will change, you may as well be a public servant. This is the time for real and significant reform in this country, NZF are going to change things, we will change the stays quo and break the system” Laws has been a Govt Policy advisor, an MP, a Mayor, Councillor for many years in three councils, historian, University lecturer, award winning columnist with 3 national papers, a talk back host with 4 different stations….. pretty impressive. Heather has moved from South Africa to NZ, went to polytech, hitched up with her boss who is 30 years older and now is on a lame stream, controlled, commercial ridden talking head show. Hardly impressive. HDA in the lead up to the last election repeatedly (along with Hoskings) told listeners in MSM moron land that Luxon should rule out NZF or Winston will either go with Labour or be a destabilising force and not allow Luxon to make the big changes. Heather doesn’t actually know much about politics, scratch her and find a pretty woke progressive beholden by the establishment (listen to her interniew with Laws nemeses Ken Mair in the quoted post to see exactly what I mean). HDA is a defender of the very system Laws and NZ First will shake up, and the smug smirk will be wiped off her face soon enough. Laws vs Tame next please, I’d pay to watch that. listen here :

Holyhekatuiteka

28,518 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

What is playing out now with the Belfast attack, with Henry Nowak, is a grand symphony of gaslighting & dishonesty that is almost too stomach-churning to watch We witnessed the same after Southport, with the rape gangs....and on & on They KNOW their mass migration ideology caused these atrocities. So they choose to deflect on to right-wing politicians, GB News and what they call the "far right". The public need to understand exactly how their game is played and the poisonous ideology that underpins it. The cycle is always the same: Fury erupts across Britain, driven not by public figures (as they claim), but by the atrocity itself. You know, the mad asylum seeker wielding a bloodied knife... Footage is shared on social media, watched with our own eyes. The pure unvarnished truth that the legacy media can't spin. Figures on the right respond with natural fury - indeed, rage - that the elite's callous disregard for reality and their fellow citizens has yet again unleashed carnage. But the media and the political class can't talk about that reality. They can't talk about the incident itself. Because they would have to admit it is thanks to them that such people - such murderers - have entered the country. The BBC, The Guardian, Sky News, Labour, the Greens, the Lib Dems & many Tories, too -- What THEY CHOOSE to talk about, what they WANT YOU TO THINK the real story is about, is the anger and the choice of words of those of us who are utterly appalled and outraged by the latest atrocity -- an atrocity THEY enabled. This is gaslighting propaganda of the most repellent and unforgivable kind. With Southport, the real story was apparently not the son of a Rwandan refugee committing one of the most heinous crimes in British history. No, the real story was Nigel Farage's reaction to that orgy of slaughter against little girls. When locals rioted, James O'Brien and others labelled it the 'Farage Riots'. The small number of rioters suddenly became the story, used to dismiss the concerns of ALL protestors. "Far-right thuggery", was how Keir Starmer referred to law-abiding mothers and pensioners. Anything to avoid talking about the crime itself and the ideology that brought its perpetrator into our country. And now we see the same playing out with the Belfast attack and the murder of Henry Nowak. Newsnight misleadingly quoted Nigel Farage as saying "white rage," a revealing and vile smear for which they have had to apologise yet again. In lockstep, the media and political class rapidly converged on their narrative: this was to be a story about Nigel Farage's naughty words. THIS is what has dominated their coverage. This is what they want to talk about in Parliament, in the TV studios, and in the press. Farage's naughty words. "Just how naughty were they? Should such bad words be tolerated? Should he be arrested?" "Do we need to apply yet more censorship to protect the public against his mean, hurty words?" These people are so far beneath contempt it is difficult to find words that do them justice. This is a story not about Nigel Farage or the right, but the deeply ingrained anti-British and anti-white ideology that is destroying this nation. This is an institutionally treasonous state, and Henry Novak and Stephen Ogilvie are its latest victims. That is the real story our political and media class are attempting to bury under a mountain of pearl-clutching theatrics, lies, and misdirection. They have blood on their hands. It's about time we said it. Clip from my monologue. 👇 Full monologue linked in the second post. 1/2
7:40

What is playing out now with the Belfast attack, with Henry Nowak, is a grand symphony of gaslighting & dishonesty that is almost too stomach-churning to watch We witnessed the same after Southport, with the rape gangs....and on & on They KNOW their mass migration ideology caused these atrocities. So they choose to deflect on to right-wing politicians, GB News and what they call the "far right". The public need to understand exactly how their game is played and the poisonous ideology that underpins it. The cycle is always the same: Fury erupts across Britain, driven not by public figures (as they claim), but by the atrocity itself. You know, the mad asylum seeker wielding a bloodied knife... Footage is shared on social media, watched with our own eyes. The pure unvarnished truth that the legacy media can't spin. Figures on the right respond with natural fury - indeed, rage - that the elite's callous disregard for reality and their fellow citizens has yet again unleashed carnage. But the media and the political class can't talk about that reality. They can't talk about the incident itself. Because they would have to admit it is thanks to them that such people - such murderers - have entered the country. The BBC, The Guardian, Sky News, Labour, the Greens, the Lib Dems & many Tories, too -- What THEY CHOOSE to talk about, what they WANT YOU TO THINK the real story is about, is the anger and the choice of words of those of us who are utterly appalled and outraged by the latest atrocity -- an atrocity THEY enabled. This is gaslighting propaganda of the most repellent and unforgivable kind. With Southport, the real story was apparently not the son of a Rwandan refugee committing one of the most heinous crimes in British history. No, the real story was Nigel Farage's reaction to that orgy of slaughter against little girls. When locals rioted, James O'Brien and others labelled it the 'Farage Riots'. The small number of rioters suddenly became the story, used to dismiss the concerns of ALL protestors. "Far-right thuggery", was how Keir Starmer referred to law-abiding mothers and pensioners. Anything to avoid talking about the crime itself and the ideology that brought its perpetrator into our country. And now we see the same playing out with the Belfast attack and the murder of Henry Nowak. Newsnight misleadingly quoted Nigel Farage as saying "white rage," a revealing and vile smear for which they have had to apologise yet again. In lockstep, the media and political class rapidly converged on their narrative: this was to be a story about Nigel Farage's naughty words. THIS is what has dominated their coverage. This is what they want to talk about in Parliament, in the TV studios, and in the press. Farage's naughty words. "Just how naughty were they? Should such bad words be tolerated? Should he be arrested?" "Do we need to apply yet more censorship to protect the public against his mean, hurty words?" These people are so far beneath contempt it is difficult to find words that do them justice. This is a story not about Nigel Farage or the right, but the deeply ingrained anti-British and anti-white ideology that is destroying this nation. This is an institutionally treasonous state, and Henry Novak and Stephen Ogilvie are its latest victims. That is the real story our political and media class are attempting to bury under a mountain of pearl-clutching theatrics, lies, and misdirection. They have blood on their hands. It's about time we said it. Clip from my monologue. 👇 Full monologue linked in the second post. 1/2

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

151,814 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

We rationalise underdevelopment when we justify low thinking & poor imagination by blaming poverty. If I got a dollar anytime someone said to me that so and so shallow reasoning outcome should be excused because so and so people are disabled by "bread and butter issues," I would have beat Musk to a trillion dollars. I blame Maslow. He made it too easy for his ideas to be bastardised. Now, the "poverty blocks thinking" excuse has a pyramid to hide behind. The animated video attached to this post depicts the so-called "Antikythera Mechanism." It is more than 2000 years old. Discovered in fragments in 1902 by a Greek Politician, several experts worked day & night to reassemble and unlock its inner workings. The machine, sometimes called the world's first analog computer, embodies 500 years of Greek conceptual thinking. But for what? It tracked the moon, aligned calendars, & modelled the cosmos. Why was such exquisite and painstaking engineering deployed to grasp such distant phenomenon? Didn't the Greeks have mouths to feed? Leaking roofs to patch? Textiles to weave? They did, but the stars could not wait. We like to tell ourselves a tidy story about progress. First bread, then stars. First fix the roads, the drains, the clinics, the hunger - and only then, much later, may a poor society permit itself to dream about higher concepts. Survival first then imagination. What the Antikythera machine tells us is that progress doesn't have that patience. The Greeks realised that watching the constellations could help manage harvests better. Reading Orion might save a fortune from drowning. Learning about fluids and screws together can overcome an invading army. Meeting basic needs also opens the door to climbing higher logic. Imagination is not the scarce resource we like to pretend it is. It is everywhere, already at work, disguised as survival. Given the reputation of the Greeks as pioneers, you might be tempted to think that this was merely the product of broad social enlightenment. Well, the period during which the pieces that became Antikythera were being assembled over hundreds of years were far from advanced. Thw average Greek was far from Plato. Most Greeks then were poorer than the average Botswanan or Moldovan today. Most couldn't read. Life expectancy was barely 40. In some Greek towns then, when a pandemic hit, random people were selected, painted, slapped & tossed out of the town in the hope of abating the disease (read about "pharmakos"). Hardly Xanadu. Yet there were pockets, subcultures, of mind-boggling genius. People calculated the size of the Earth using sticks & shadows. And the distance to the moon using rods and discs. Such pockets can be found today in Kokompe and Suame Magazine too, in the little folds of our daily lives. The spirit is in the soups that take 4 hours to make. And the funeral mourning display and its sequenced rhythms. Do these elaborate tapestries not flourish in the midst of poverty because they matter more than food? The real question is why so little of these sparks of elaborate imagination and creativity accumulate into broad changes in our societies. Into industrialisation, modernisation, city planning, and all the higher order systems we seem to crave. Funny enough, Antikythera also begs this same question. That machine did not start an industrial revolution. It became a fossil. The workshop vanished, the patrons died, the knowledge stayed trapped in too few hands - and the sea swallowed the rest. What was missing was not genius. It was a big enough subculture to grow around it. Call it a conversion belt. Think of it as the difference between a miracle and a civilisation. And this is exactly where too many of our economies stall today. We celebrate the occasional hero, the sudden breakthroughs, but fail to form clubs to sustain the spark. Yes we are saddled with "bread & butter issues," but we can always choose to make it about "bread & stars" if we want.
1:17

We rationalise underdevelopment when we justify low thinking & poor imagination by blaming poverty. If I got a dollar anytime someone said to me that so and so shallow reasoning outcome should be excused because so and so people are disabled by "bread and butter issues," I would have beat Musk to a trillion dollars. I blame Maslow. He made it too easy for his ideas to be bastardised. Now, the "poverty blocks thinking" excuse has a pyramid to hide behind. The animated video attached to this post depicts the so-called "Antikythera Mechanism." It is more than 2000 years old. Discovered in fragments in 1902 by a Greek Politician, several experts worked day & night to reassemble and unlock its inner workings. The machine, sometimes called the world's first analog computer, embodies 500 years of Greek conceptual thinking. But for what? It tracked the moon, aligned calendars, & modelled the cosmos. Why was such exquisite and painstaking engineering deployed to grasp such distant phenomenon? Didn't the Greeks have mouths to feed? Leaking roofs to patch? Textiles to weave? They did, but the stars could not wait. We like to tell ourselves a tidy story about progress. First bread, then stars. First fix the roads, the drains, the clinics, the hunger - and only then, much later, may a poor society permit itself to dream about higher concepts. Survival first then imagination. What the Antikythera machine tells us is that progress doesn't have that patience. The Greeks realised that watching the constellations could help manage harvests better. Reading Orion might save a fortune from drowning. Learning about fluids and screws together can overcome an invading army. Meeting basic needs also opens the door to climbing higher logic. Imagination is not the scarce resource we like to pretend it is. It is everywhere, already at work, disguised as survival. Given the reputation of the Greeks as pioneers, you might be tempted to think that this was merely the product of broad social enlightenment. Well, the period during which the pieces that became Antikythera were being assembled over hundreds of years were far from advanced. Thw average Greek was far from Plato. Most Greeks then were poorer than the average Botswanan or Moldovan today. Most couldn't read. Life expectancy was barely 40. In some Greek towns then, when a pandemic hit, random people were selected, painted, slapped & tossed out of the town in the hope of abating the disease (read about "pharmakos"). Hardly Xanadu. Yet there were pockets, subcultures, of mind-boggling genius. People calculated the size of the Earth using sticks & shadows. And the distance to the moon using rods and discs. Such pockets can be found today in Kokompe and Suame Magazine too, in the little folds of our daily lives. The spirit is in the soups that take 4 hours to make. And the funeral mourning display and its sequenced rhythms. Do these elaborate tapestries not flourish in the midst of poverty because they matter more than food? The real question is why so little of these sparks of elaborate imagination and creativity accumulate into broad changes in our societies. Into industrialisation, modernisation, city planning, and all the higher order systems we seem to crave. Funny enough, Antikythera also begs this same question. That machine did not start an industrial revolution. It became a fossil. The workshop vanished, the patrons died, the knowledge stayed trapped in too few hands - and the sea swallowed the rest. What was missing was not genius. It was a big enough subculture to grow around it. Call it a conversion belt. Think of it as the difference between a miracle and a civilisation. And this is exactly where too many of our economies stall today. We celebrate the occasional hero, the sudden breakthroughs, but fail to form clubs to sustain the spark. Yes we are saddled with "bread & butter issues," but we can always choose to make it about "bread & stars" if we want.

Bright Simons

12,289 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 Urgent Donation for Gaza – After the Destruction of the Last Water Station, Thirst Is Besieging Life 🚨 Yesterday, the last water station in Gaza was destroyed, and from that moment, this was no longer a temporary crisis, but a life being slowly pulled away from dry mouths and exhausted bodies with nothing left to resist. In Gaza, thirst is no longer a possibility or a warning—it is a daily reality that suffocates breath, dries throats, and silences life without noise, while heavy hours pass like a cruel test deciding who survives and who collapses first. Children in Gaza are no longer asking for toys, schools, or big dreams, because all of those words are now far removed from their reality; what they ask for today is only water—water that keeps their small bodies from drying out and gives them a simple chance to open their eyes to another morning. These children carry jerrycans of water heavier than their own bodies, walking between tents, rubble, and dust, when they should have been carrying notebooks and pencils and running freely, but the world chose for them a different path called thirst. The elderly collapse because their bodies can no longer endure long days without water, as heads grow heavy, hearts weaken, and every step becomes a final attempt to stay alive. Families sit for long hours around empty containers, staring at them in painful silence, waiting for a single drop that could mean one more day of life—or an end without farewell. Mothers divide one cup of water among their children, knowing that this small cup carries an unbearable decision: one child drinks and may live, another waits and may not wake up—yet they have no other choice. This is not emotional language or exaggeration; it is the reality unfolding now in Gaza, after water was turned into a weapon and thirst into a slow method of killing that leaves behind nothing but absence. As a new year begins, thousands of families still live in torn tents, exposed to cold, fear, and thirst, asking not for comfort or a future, but simply to remain alive for one more day. In the midst of this darkness, some chose to be life when it was disappearing: ✨ William Menaker Will 🦥 Menaker 🔥 Felix GoliathFan1952 🤍 Eyup Lovely Eyup Lovely Because of them, water reached the tents before collapse—children on the edge of fainting drank, the elderly caught their breath, and mothers cried because the water arrived, not because their children were gone. In Gaza, water is not a luxury, not a service, and not an ordinary detail—it is the line between a child who lives and a child who disappears in silence, between a mother holding her children and a mother left alone. Because of your support, thirst stopped killing—if only for a moment—breath returned to chests that were about to fail, and families survived one more day in a place that offers no guarantee of tomorrow. 🌟 A thank you from the heart, and from life itself: William Menaker • Felix • Eyup Lovely You did not just provide water—you restored life at the moment it was about to fade. But the painful truth remains: water is still running out, thirst does not wait, and every minute of delay may mean another body falling silently. 💧 Your donation today is not just support—it is the cup that may arrive before it is too late, and the reason a child opens their eyes tomorrow instead of closing them forever. 🚨 Donate now—because thirst does not offer a second chance: In Gaza, no one dies suddenly— people are left to dry out slowly. Be the reason that stops it.
0:57

🚨 Urgent Donation for Gaza – After the Destruction of the Last Water Station, Thirst Is Besieging Life 🚨 Yesterday, the last water station in Gaza was destroyed, and from that moment, this was no longer a temporary crisis, but a life being slowly pulled away from dry mouths and exhausted bodies with nothing left to resist. In Gaza, thirst is no longer a possibility or a warning—it is a daily reality that suffocates breath, dries throats, and silences life without noise, while heavy hours pass like a cruel test deciding who survives and who collapses first. Children in Gaza are no longer asking for toys, schools, or big dreams, because all of those words are now far removed from their reality; what they ask for today is only water—water that keeps their small bodies from drying out and gives them a simple chance to open their eyes to another morning. These children carry jerrycans of water heavier than their own bodies, walking between tents, rubble, and dust, when they should have been carrying notebooks and pencils and running freely, but the world chose for them a different path called thirst. The elderly collapse because their bodies can no longer endure long days without water, as heads grow heavy, hearts weaken, and every step becomes a final attempt to stay alive. Families sit for long hours around empty containers, staring at them in painful silence, waiting for a single drop that could mean one more day of life—or an end without farewell. Mothers divide one cup of water among their children, knowing that this small cup carries an unbearable decision: one child drinks and may live, another waits and may not wake up—yet they have no other choice. This is not emotional language or exaggeration; it is the reality unfolding now in Gaza, after water was turned into a weapon and thirst into a slow method of killing that leaves behind nothing but absence. As a new year begins, thousands of families still live in torn tents, exposed to cold, fear, and thirst, asking not for comfort or a future, but simply to remain alive for one more day. In the midst of this darkness, some chose to be life when it was disappearing: ✨ William Menaker Will 🦥 Menaker 🔥 Felix GoliathFan1952 🤍 Eyup Lovely Eyup Lovely Because of them, water reached the tents before collapse—children on the edge of fainting drank, the elderly caught their breath, and mothers cried because the water arrived, not because their children were gone. In Gaza, water is not a luxury, not a service, and not an ordinary detail—it is the line between a child who lives and a child who disappears in silence, between a mother holding her children and a mother left alone. Because of your support, thirst stopped killing—if only for a moment—breath returned to chests that were about to fail, and families survived one more day in a place that offers no guarantee of tomorrow. 🌟 A thank you from the heart, and from life itself: William Menaker • Felix • Eyup Lovely You did not just provide water—you restored life at the moment it was about to fade. But the painful truth remains: water is still running out, thirst does not wait, and every minute of delay may mean another body falling silently. 💧 Your donation today is not just support—it is the cup that may arrive before it is too late, and the reason a child opens their eyes tomorrow instead of closing them forever. 🚨 Donate now—because thirst does not offer a second chance: In Gaza, no one dies suddenly— people are left to dry out slowly. Be the reason that stops it.

Muhmmed Project𓂆 🇵🇸

98,689 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

The Dirty Little Secret About Homelessness Is Also The Key To Ending It The US Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments about what cities can and cannot do to end homelessness. "What if there is a bed available in the Gospel Rescue Mission, but Ms. Johnson, a person, doesn't want it? Doesn’t wish to leave their pet. Her Rottweiler's not permitted there. So that is a difficult question for a person and a difficult policy question..." What everyone agreed on was that homelessness is a difficult problem. "Many people have mentioned this is a serious policy problem… So, the policy questions in this case are very difficult….Martin speaks in terms of someone who is involuntarily homeless and that raises all of those policy questions… We usually think about whether state law, local law already achieves those purposes so that the federal courts aren't micromanaging homeless policy…" I think most people listening to the Supreme Court would agree: it isn’t going to solve homelessness. That is a job for state legislators. So why haven’t they? Why has homelessness gotten worse? The answer that many homeless advocates give is that it’s because we don’t have enough homes, and poverty has increased. But neither is true. Poverty has steadily declined since the 1980s, when homelessness first became an issue of public concern. And very few people are on the street simply because they can’t afford the rent. The evidence is overwhelming that the majority of people on the street are there because of untreated mental illness or addiction, which leads people to use all their money to support their drug habit and be high, rather than work. People who can’t afford the rent but are able to work and aren’t in the grip of addiction or untreated mental illness find a cheaper place to live, move somewhere cheaper, or live with family and friends. It’s true there aren’t enough shelter beds, case workers, group homes, and psychiatric hospitals to care for the homeless. But a big part of the reason for that is that advocates for the homeless have, for 40 years, demanded that funding for dealing with the homeless go into giving people private studio apartments rather than building sufficient shelter beds. They call this “Housing First,” and its record is awful. Few stay in housing, and many die because it fails to treat the cause of the problem, addiction, and untreated mental illness rather than the symptoms. Studies find that cities that prioritize basic shelter over expensive housing reduce the deaths of homeless by 3-fold. And so in LA, homeless die at a rate 3 times higher than New York because living inside protects people from murder, drug overdose, and car accidents. Making matters worse, homeless advocates, along with the ACLU, have opposed expanding psychiatric hospitals, and mandatory care in general, because they believe it’s worse to mandate hospitalization for people who are dangerously psychotic or manic than to simply leave them on the street. But it’s not. Last year, 112,000 Americans died from drug overdose and poisoning because we failed to mandate treatment. Two of my friends from high school would still be alive today had we mandated they get treatment for addiction rather than letting them die. What is happening on homelessness is a record of failure. The number of drug deaths quintupled from 20,000 in 2022 to 112,000 last year. That’s more people dying per year than died in Hiroshima. Homelessness is not a fundamental problem of housing. It’s a problem of enabling addiction and untreated mental illness, both of which lead people to give up on work, lie, steal, cheat their families and friends, and live on the street, where they turn to petty crime to sustain their drug habits. This seems cruel to many people, which is why homelessness has gotten worse. In other words, the reason homelessness has gotten worse is because we’ve enabled it, and subsidized it, rather than funded treatment and recovery. Nobody has subsidized homelessness more than California, Washington, and Oregon. And it’s been in those states that homelessness has worsened the most. Why? The homelessness groups really believe it’s more cruel to mandate care than to let people die on the streets. But there is an ideology behind this, too. It’s the idea that people suffering from addiction and mental illness are victims of society or the system, which is fundamentally evil. And, according to their logic, to restore justice in the world, we must give victims whatever they want, including the right to camp anywhere and use hard drugs, even if it results in their death. You might call this "pathological altruism. Think of the Kathy Bates character in Misery. Or of the mother who poisons her child in order to have a sick person to take care of, like in “Sixth Sense.” It’s no coincidence that the same people who believe this also think civilization is evil and should be replaced by something more akin to primitive anarchism, like the kind romanticized by intellectuals since Rousseau. The alternative to this dystopia is tough love. We need to give people the care they need, but that’s not through enabling addiction and illegal behavior, but rather enforcing laws and mandating care, as an alternative to jail, when they are broken. It’s not enough to do what many Republicans want to do, which is to enforce laws and recriminalize shoplifting and hard drugs simply. We need to do that, for sure. But states must also have caseworkers, group homes, and psychiatric hospitals so there is an alternative to jail, and so states can provide people with the specialized care where it’s available, which simply isn’t going to be in many of the small towns, like the one at the center of the Supreme Court hearing. The dirty little secret about homelessness, which is also the key to ending it, is...
5:52

The Dirty Little Secret About Homelessness Is Also The Key To Ending It The US Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments about what cities can and cannot do to end homelessness. "What if there is a bed available in the Gospel Rescue Mission, but Ms. Johnson, a person, doesn't want it? Doesn’t wish to leave their pet. Her Rottweiler's not permitted there. So that is a difficult question for a person and a difficult policy question..." What everyone agreed on was that homelessness is a difficult problem. "Many people have mentioned this is a serious policy problem… So, the policy questions in this case are very difficult….Martin speaks in terms of someone who is involuntarily homeless and that raises all of those policy questions… We usually think about whether state law, local law already achieves those purposes so that the federal courts aren't micromanaging homeless policy…" I think most people listening to the Supreme Court would agree: it isn’t going to solve homelessness. That is a job for state legislators. So why haven’t they? Why has homelessness gotten worse? The answer that many homeless advocates give is that it’s because we don’t have enough homes, and poverty has increased. But neither is true. Poverty has steadily declined since the 1980s, when homelessness first became an issue of public concern. And very few people are on the street simply because they can’t afford the rent. The evidence is overwhelming that the majority of people on the street are there because of untreated mental illness or addiction, which leads people to use all their money to support their drug habit and be high, rather than work. People who can’t afford the rent but are able to work and aren’t in the grip of addiction or untreated mental illness find a cheaper place to live, move somewhere cheaper, or live with family and friends. It’s true there aren’t enough shelter beds, case workers, group homes, and psychiatric hospitals to care for the homeless. But a big part of the reason for that is that advocates for the homeless have, for 40 years, demanded that funding for dealing with the homeless go into giving people private studio apartments rather than building sufficient shelter beds. They call this “Housing First,” and its record is awful. Few stay in housing, and many die because it fails to treat the cause of the problem, addiction, and untreated mental illness rather than the symptoms. Studies find that cities that prioritize basic shelter over expensive housing reduce the deaths of homeless by 3-fold. And so in LA, homeless die at a rate 3 times higher than New York because living inside protects people from murder, drug overdose, and car accidents. Making matters worse, homeless advocates, along with the ACLU, have opposed expanding psychiatric hospitals, and mandatory care in general, because they believe it’s worse to mandate hospitalization for people who are dangerously psychotic or manic than to simply leave them on the street. But it’s not. Last year, 112,000 Americans died from drug overdose and poisoning because we failed to mandate treatment. Two of my friends from high school would still be alive today had we mandated they get treatment for addiction rather than letting them die. What is happening on homelessness is a record of failure. The number of drug deaths quintupled from 20,000 in 2022 to 112,000 last year. That’s more people dying per year than died in Hiroshima. Homelessness is not a fundamental problem of housing. It’s a problem of enabling addiction and untreated mental illness, both of which lead people to give up on work, lie, steal, cheat their families and friends, and live on the street, where they turn to petty crime to sustain their drug habits. This seems cruel to many people, which is why homelessness has gotten worse. In other words, the reason homelessness has gotten worse is because we’ve enabled it, and subsidized it, rather than funded treatment and recovery. Nobody has subsidized homelessness more than California, Washington, and Oregon. And it’s been in those states that homelessness has worsened the most. Why? The homelessness groups really believe it’s more cruel to mandate care than to let people die on the streets. But there is an ideology behind this, too. It’s the idea that people suffering from addiction and mental illness are victims of society or the system, which is fundamentally evil. And, according to their logic, to restore justice in the world, we must give victims whatever they want, including the right to camp anywhere and use hard drugs, even if it results in their death. You might call this "pathological altruism. Think of the Kathy Bates character in Misery. Or of the mother who poisons her child in order to have a sick person to take care of, like in “Sixth Sense.” It’s no coincidence that the same people who believe this also think civilization is evil and should be replaced by something more akin to primitive anarchism, like the kind romanticized by intellectuals since Rousseau. The alternative to this dystopia is tough love. We need to give people the care they need, but that’s not through enabling addiction and illegal behavior, but rather enforcing laws and mandating care, as an alternative to jail, when they are broken. It’s not enough to do what many Republicans want to do, which is to enforce laws and recriminalize shoplifting and hard drugs simply. We need to do that, for sure. But states must also have caseworkers, group homes, and psychiatric hospitals so there is an alternative to jail, and so states can provide people with the specialized care where it’s available, which simply isn’t going to be in many of the small towns, like the one at the center of the Supreme Court hearing. The dirty little secret about homelessness, which is also the key to ending it, is...

Michael Shellenberger

29,148,561 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨THE POPE’S WAR ON CHRISTENDOM: HIS ISLAMIC FANTASY VS. EUROPE’S BLOODY REALITY During his carefully stage-managed “interfaith” tour through Turkey and Lebanon, the Pope was confronted with a question he could not honestly evade: “Is Islam a threat to the Christian identity of the West?” Instead of answering with Scripture, history, or even basic honesty, he delivered a rehearsed globalist talking point: ❌ “These fears are created by people against immigration.” ❌ “We should be less fearful.” ❌ “Lebanon - yes, Lebanon - is the model for Europe and the United States.” This isn’t spiritual leadership; it is dangerous ideological blindness that collapses the moment it meets reality. 🔥 POINT 1: ‘Fears Are Created by Anti-Immigration People’? No! They Are Created by Reality. Europe didn’t acquire fear through rhetoric. Europe acquired fear through bloodshed. Is it “fearmongering” to remember: Father Jacques Hamel, beheaded at his altar in France? The Nice truck massacre, killing 86? The Bataclan jihadists, slaughtering 90 concertgoers? The Vienna Islamic State attack? The London Bridge attackers, stabbing innocents while shouting “Allahu Akbar”? Churches attacked every single week. The list goes on and on... People aren’t afraid because someone told them to be. People are afraid because jihad has arrived in their neighborhoods: Mothers walking into Christmas markets Priests stepping onto altars Girls commuting home from school This fear is not manufactured. It is earned by suffering! 🔥 POINT 2: Lebanon Is a “Model”? Then Let’s Tell the Truth About Lebanon. Lebanon is not a symbol of coexistence. Lebanon is a warning, the precise blueprint of what happens when Islam becomes politically dominant. Lebanon was once: 80% Christian A thriving, Western-facing nation The “Paris of the Middle East” Then came: Islamic militias Civil war The rise of Hezbollah The slaughter and expulsion of Christians A nation transformed through demographic conquest If Lebanon is the model the Pope is promoting, then he is endorsing: Christian decline Islamic entrenchment The rise of extremist governance Lebanon didn’t become coexistence; it became submission. This is not a lesson for Europe to emulate; it’s the nightmare Europe is already living. 🔥 POINT 3: “Dialogue and Respect” Mean Nothing When One Side Is Bleeding The Pope speaks of “dialogue,” “friendship,” and “respect.” Tell that to: French priests who now celebrate Mass behind locked doors Jewish children who need armed guards for school Women in Sweden, Germany, and the UK raped by “refugees” protected by political correctness Christians in Nigeria, Egypt, Iraq, Syria, and Kenya are butchered while the Vatican whispers “dialogue.” Christian martyrs don’t need platitudes. They need truth. And the truth is this: The Qur’an’s theology of Jesus, Christians, and Jews is fundamentally incompatible with Christian survival. Their OWN scholars teach: Jesus will destroy the Cross Jesus will abolish Christianity Jesus will establish Islam as the only religion (Ibn Kathir, Tafsir) This is not respect. It is a replacement doctrine. 🔥 POINT 4: Islam’s Use of “Jesus” Is a Weapon -Not a Bridge While the Pope gushes about coexistence, Islam advances a global PR campaign: “We love Jesus too!” This is a complete and utter lie! The Islamic “Isa” is: Not the Son of God Not crucified Not resurrected Not the Redeemer And in Islamic prophecy? Isa returns to abolish all religions except Islam. This isn’t coexistence like the Pope likes to push; it is conquest carried out through calculated theological fraud. As RAIR exposed in “The Counterfeit Christ: Islam’s War to Replace Jesus,” Islam doesn’t honor Jesus; it weaponizes Him. 🔥 POINT 5: The Pope Preaches Blindness While Christians Pay the Price He tells Europeans to “be less fearful.” Tell that to: The families of the Stockholm truck massacre The teenagers blown apart at the Manchester Arena The victims of Christmas market attacks Catholics who can no longer wear a cross in public Communities where churches require armed guards just to hold Sunday Mass Towns where Nativity scenes have been banned to “avoid migrants beheading Jesus” Fear is not bigotry, it is the rational response of a civilization under attack. The Pope has confused submission with compassion, and Christians are paying the price. 🔥 POINT 6: HOW ABOUT HONESTY ABOUT WHY HE’S PUSHING MUSLIM MIGRATION INTO THE WEST? If the Pope wants to talk about “fear,” then let’s address what he refuses to mention: The Vatican is an active partner in the global refugee-resettlement machine, a billion-dollar industry moving overwhelmingly Muslim populations into Christian nations under the banner of “compassion.” He scolds Europeans for wanting borders, rebukes Americans for insisting on national sovereignty, and sermonizes endlessly about “dialogue” as if lectures can replace the reality unfolding on the ground But he never admits: 💰 The Catholic Church is one of the biggest financial beneficiaries of mass migration on earth. Through government contracts, NGOs, and UN alliances, the Church earns massive income from resettling migrants. He also never mentions: 🌍 His alignment with Amy Pope, the UN’s migration chief, who is engineering the very demographic transformation crushing Christian nations. I exposed it plainly: Pope Leo XIV met privately with UN migration czar Amy Pope just days before attacking Trump’s border protections. The IOM, run by Amy Pope, is the operational engine of the global migration industry. The UN pipeline is heavily influenced by the OIC. the same bloc pushing Islamic blasphemy laws and demographic expansion. The Vatican provides this agenda with moral cover, while the UN provides it with institutional power. This is a dangerous coordinated effort... And if Lebanon is his “model,” then the Pope is not describing coexistence. He is describing replacement disguised as virtue. 🔥 THE QUESTION HE REFUSES TO ANSWER Why are you demanding that Europe and America absorb endless waves of Muslim migrants while you partner with the very networks engineering the West’s demographic transformation? Because the truth is simple, this is the Great Replacement, sanctified from Rome. He never pressures the 57 Muslim-majority nations of the OIC to take in their own migrants. He only demands that the Christian West open its borders. This is population transfer masquerading as piety. ⚡ DEMOGRAPHIC REPLACEMENT While Christians across Europe bury their dead after jihadist attacks, Pope Leo XIV insists their fear is immoral. At the same time, he collaborates with UN migration architects, pressures Western nations to remain borderless, and funnels millions of Muslim migrants into the very communities being torn apart. If he wants to lecture Christians about “fear,” then he must first explain: Why is he helping engineer the demographic invasion he insists they should not notice? Until he answers that, his sermons ring hollow. A shepherd who leads his flock into wolves is not compassionate; he is complicit.
2:12

🚨THE POPE’S WAR ON CHRISTENDOM: HIS ISLAMIC FANTASY VS. EUROPE’S BLOODY REALITY During his carefully stage-managed “interfaith” tour through Turkey and Lebanon, the Pope was confronted with a question he could not honestly evade: “Is Islam a threat to the Christian identity of the West?” Instead of answering with Scripture, history, or even basic honesty, he delivered a rehearsed globalist talking point: ❌ “These fears are created by people against immigration.” ❌ “We should be less fearful.” ❌ “Lebanon - yes, Lebanon - is the model for Europe and the United States.” This isn’t spiritual leadership; it is dangerous ideological blindness that collapses the moment it meets reality. 🔥 POINT 1: ‘Fears Are Created by Anti-Immigration People’? No! They Are Created by Reality. Europe didn’t acquire fear through rhetoric. Europe acquired fear through bloodshed. Is it “fearmongering” to remember: Father Jacques Hamel, beheaded at his altar in France? The Nice truck massacre, killing 86? The Bataclan jihadists, slaughtering 90 concertgoers? The Vienna Islamic State attack? The London Bridge attackers, stabbing innocents while shouting “Allahu Akbar”? Churches attacked every single week. The list goes on and on... People aren’t afraid because someone told them to be. People are afraid because jihad has arrived in their neighborhoods: Mothers walking into Christmas markets Priests stepping onto altars Girls commuting home from school This fear is not manufactured. It is earned by suffering! 🔥 POINT 2: Lebanon Is a “Model”? Then Let’s Tell the Truth About Lebanon. Lebanon is not a symbol of coexistence. Lebanon is a warning, the precise blueprint of what happens when Islam becomes politically dominant. Lebanon was once: 80% Christian A thriving, Western-facing nation The “Paris of the Middle East” Then came: Islamic militias Civil war The rise of Hezbollah The slaughter and expulsion of Christians A nation transformed through demographic conquest If Lebanon is the model the Pope is promoting, then he is endorsing: Christian decline Islamic entrenchment The rise of extremist governance Lebanon didn’t become coexistence; it became submission. This is not a lesson for Europe to emulate; it’s the nightmare Europe is already living. 🔥 POINT 3: “Dialogue and Respect” Mean Nothing When One Side Is Bleeding The Pope speaks of “dialogue,” “friendship,” and “respect.” Tell that to: French priests who now celebrate Mass behind locked doors Jewish children who need armed guards for school Women in Sweden, Germany, and the UK raped by “refugees” protected by political correctness Christians in Nigeria, Egypt, Iraq, Syria, and Kenya are butchered while the Vatican whispers “dialogue.” Christian martyrs don’t need platitudes. They need truth. And the truth is this: The Qur’an’s theology of Jesus, Christians, and Jews is fundamentally incompatible with Christian survival. Their OWN scholars teach: Jesus will destroy the Cross Jesus will abolish Christianity Jesus will establish Islam as the only religion (Ibn Kathir, Tafsir) This is not respect. It is a replacement doctrine. 🔥 POINT 4: Islam’s Use of “Jesus” Is a Weapon -Not a Bridge While the Pope gushes about coexistence, Islam advances a global PR campaign: “We love Jesus too!” This is a complete and utter lie! The Islamic “Isa” is: Not the Son of God Not crucified Not resurrected Not the Redeemer And in Islamic prophecy? Isa returns to abolish all religions except Islam. This isn’t coexistence like the Pope likes to push; it is conquest carried out through calculated theological fraud. As RAIR exposed in “The Counterfeit Christ: Islam’s War to Replace Jesus,” Islam doesn’t honor Jesus; it weaponizes Him. 🔥 POINT 5: The Pope Preaches Blindness While Christians Pay the Price He tells Europeans to “be less fearful.” Tell that to: The families of the Stockholm truck massacre The teenagers blown apart at the Manchester Arena The victims of Christmas market attacks Catholics who can no longer wear a cross in public Communities where churches require armed guards just to hold Sunday Mass Towns where Nativity scenes have been banned to “avoid migrants beheading Jesus” Fear is not bigotry, it is the rational response of a civilization under attack. The Pope has confused submission with compassion, and Christians are paying the price. 🔥 POINT 6: HOW ABOUT HONESTY ABOUT WHY HE’S PUSHING MUSLIM MIGRATION INTO THE WEST? If the Pope wants to talk about “fear,” then let’s address what he refuses to mention: The Vatican is an active partner in the global refugee-resettlement machine, a billion-dollar industry moving overwhelmingly Muslim populations into Christian nations under the banner of “compassion.” He scolds Europeans for wanting borders, rebukes Americans for insisting on national sovereignty, and sermonizes endlessly about “dialogue” as if lectures can replace the reality unfolding on the ground But he never admits: 💰 The Catholic Church is one of the biggest financial beneficiaries of mass migration on earth. Through government contracts, NGOs, and UN alliances, the Church earns massive income from resettling migrants. He also never mentions: 🌍 His alignment with Amy Pope, the UN’s migration chief, who is engineering the very demographic transformation crushing Christian nations. I exposed it plainly: Pope Leo XIV met privately with UN migration czar Amy Pope just days before attacking Trump’s border protections. The IOM, run by Amy Pope, is the operational engine of the global migration industry. The UN pipeline is heavily influenced by the OIC. the same bloc pushing Islamic blasphemy laws and demographic expansion. The Vatican provides this agenda with moral cover, while the UN provides it with institutional power. This is a dangerous coordinated effort... And if Lebanon is his “model,” then the Pope is not describing coexistence. He is describing replacement disguised as virtue. 🔥 THE QUESTION HE REFUSES TO ANSWER Why are you demanding that Europe and America absorb endless waves of Muslim migrants while you partner with the very networks engineering the West’s demographic transformation? Because the truth is simple, this is the Great Replacement, sanctified from Rome. He never pressures the 57 Muslim-majority nations of the OIC to take in their own migrants. He only demands that the Christian West open its borders. This is population transfer masquerading as piety. ⚡ DEMOGRAPHIC REPLACEMENT While Christians across Europe bury their dead after jihadist attacks, Pope Leo XIV insists their fear is immoral. At the same time, he collaborates with UN migration architects, pressures Western nations to remain borderless, and funnels millions of Muslim migrants into the very communities being torn apart. If he wants to lecture Christians about “fear,” then he must first explain: Why is he helping engineer the demographic invasion he insists they should not notice? Until he answers that, his sermons ring hollow. A shepherd who leads his flock into wolves is not compassionate; he is complicit.

Amy Mek

241,892 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Steve Levitan is the creator of Modern Family, one of the most popular sitcoms in history, which won 22 Emmy Awards. This conversation is all about how he wrote it. Highlights below: 1. Know the theme of what you’re writing, as it’ll give you a north star for every decision you make. 2. Better stories come from bigger conflicts, but bigger doesn’t mean screaming and explosions, but rather the high stakes that come from a conflict that’ll cost the characters emotionally if it isn’t resolved. 3. What kinds of conflicts work best? The stuff that never changes: love, loss, heartbreak… relationships between parents and kids, couples working through their problems. 4. The story is everything. Once you crack what’s actually going to happen, the script practically writes itself. That’s why there’s an old screenwriter saying that the first draft is 90% finished once you’re done with the outline. 5. Cut the half-jokes: A lukewarm joke kills momentum faster than no joke at all. 6. Be real. Take it down a notch. Steven gets annoyed by “big.” When things feel heightened to the point where they don’t feel human anymore, or when they’re performing on stage, to an audience, instead of just being real people. 7. Emotional moments must be earned. You want them to sneak up on you, to be understated. 8. Steven would spy on his family for TV gold. Sometimes, he’d be sitting at the table, take his phone out to frantically capture the dialogue. When friends came over, his kids would joke: “Be careful what you say around the Levitan house. It might end up on Modern Family." 9. A writer’s antenna needs to be up at all times. If you're observant, there's almost nowhere you can't go where you don't think: "That's funny." 10. Some questions for writers to ask themselves: Does it feel real? Are they talking the way people talk? Are you tapping into what you're thinking about today? 11. Conflict is everything, but how you do it matters. Don't just slap "these two hate each other" on your characters and call it conflict. Dig into who they actually are: what specific traits, backgrounds, or worldviews make them rub each other the wrong way? The clash has to come from something real. 12. Steven’s mantra for writing Modern Family episodes: Keep it moving, but don’t race through them (he thinks the episodes became too frenetic in the later years). 13. How was modern family written? About 7 writers. 8-10 weeks of story breaking at the beginning of a new season. Then the weekly cycle began: Mondays and Tuesdays were for rewrites, Wednesdays were for table reads, and then the final versions were due by Friday. 14. What happens before a show is launched? Writers spend weeks doing nothing but talking about characters and the dynamics between them, with the goal of establishing relationships that’ll play out over the course of hundreds of episodes (if things go well). 15. Give your characters a comedic lens to see the world through. On Modern Family, Phil is the Dad and he thinks he’s the “cool dad” with misguided confidence that he’s hipper than he really is, so the writers of the show knew how he’d react to things before they even wrote the scene. I've shared the full conversation with Steve Levitan below, and if you want to watch it on YouTube or find the audio links for Apple or Spotify, check out the reply tweets.
1:40:34

Steve Levitan is the creator of Modern Family, one of the most popular sitcoms in history, which won 22 Emmy Awards. This conversation is all about how he wrote it. Highlights below: 1. Know the theme of what you’re writing, as it’ll give you a north star for every decision you make. 2. Better stories come from bigger conflicts, but bigger doesn’t mean screaming and explosions, but rather the high stakes that come from a conflict that’ll cost the characters emotionally if it isn’t resolved. 3. What kinds of conflicts work best? The stuff that never changes: love, loss, heartbreak… relationships between parents and kids, couples working through their problems. 4. The story is everything. Once you crack what’s actually going to happen, the script practically writes itself. That’s why there’s an old screenwriter saying that the first draft is 90% finished once you’re done with the outline. 5. Cut the half-jokes: A lukewarm joke kills momentum faster than no joke at all. 6. Be real. Take it down a notch. Steven gets annoyed by “big.” When things feel heightened to the point where they don’t feel human anymore, or when they’re performing on stage, to an audience, instead of just being real people. 7. Emotional moments must be earned. You want them to sneak up on you, to be understated. 8. Steven would spy on his family for TV gold. Sometimes, he’d be sitting at the table, take his phone out to frantically capture the dialogue. When friends came over, his kids would joke: “Be careful what you say around the Levitan house. It might end up on Modern Family." 9. A writer’s antenna needs to be up at all times. If you're observant, there's almost nowhere you can't go where you don't think: "That's funny." 10. Some questions for writers to ask themselves: Does it feel real? Are they talking the way people talk? Are you tapping into what you're thinking about today? 11. Conflict is everything, but how you do it matters. Don't just slap "these two hate each other" on your characters and call it conflict. Dig into who they actually are: what specific traits, backgrounds, or worldviews make them rub each other the wrong way? The clash has to come from something real. 12. Steven’s mantra for writing Modern Family episodes: Keep it moving, but don’t race through them (he thinks the episodes became too frenetic in the later years). 13. How was modern family written? About 7 writers. 8-10 weeks of story breaking at the beginning of a new season. Then the weekly cycle began: Mondays and Tuesdays were for rewrites, Wednesdays were for table reads, and then the final versions were due by Friday. 14. What happens before a show is launched? Writers spend weeks doing nothing but talking about characters and the dynamics between them, with the goal of establishing relationships that’ll play out over the course of hundreds of episodes (if things go well). 15. Give your characters a comedic lens to see the world through. On Modern Family, Phil is the Dad and he thinks he’s the “cool dad” with misguided confidence that he’s hipper than he really is, so the writers of the show knew how he’d react to things before they even wrote the scene. I've shared the full conversation with Steve Levitan below, and if you want to watch it on YouTube or find the audio links for Apple or Spotify, check out the reply tweets.

David Perell

70,518 просмотров • 1 год назад

The trap was the constitution and Trump sprung it in broad daylight... [they’ve] been after him since day one... from the moment he descended that golden escalator, the Deep State system activated... Not just political enemies... the entire intelligence community, federal law enforcement, state prosecutors, activist judges, and [their] media handlers... [they] tried to stop him with scandal, smear, indictment, impeachments, gag orders, raids... But [they] missed one critical detail... Trump wasn’t defending himself... he was baiting the system... Every move they made, every case they filed, every lie [they] told... it all became part of the record... he let [them] walk into the trap... and the trap was the Constitution... it started at the local level... They weaponized rogue DAs like Alvin Bragg, who revived a dead misdemeanor case to fabricate a felony... Letitia James ran a civil case so twisted she claimed Trump inflated property values... even though banks were paid, profits were made, and no one complained... Fani Willis indicted Trump for asking a question about election integrity... a question backed by mountains of sworn affidavits, video evidence, and constitutional authority... Every time a judge allowed it, every time a motion was denied, every time a gag order was issued... [they] marked themselves, on paper, for history... Then came the federal tier... Trump’s Executive Orders during his first term were surgical... he wasn’t just undoing Obama’s damage... he was laying constitutional landmines... EO 13765 rolled back Obamacare's mandate enforcement... activist judges rushed to block it, exposing their disregard for legislative process... EO 13818, the sleeper, targeted global human rights violators and allowed for seizure of assets connected to corruption and trafficking... it laid the foundation to financially gut cartel connected officials, even inside the US... EO 13848, triggered by foreign interference in elections, created the legal framework to seize foreign-owned media, tech platforms, and corporate assets... it has never been revoked.... it remains active... EO 13959 blocked American investment in Chinese military companies... hitting the real financial pipeline of globalist control... BlackRock, Statestreet, and Vanguard tried to dance around it... too late... the paper trail is sealed... and every time one of these orders was challenged in court, the ruling told you exactly who the judge served... the Republic, or the Deep State regime... Then came 2025, and Trump didn’t come back to play games... this time, the gloves were off, and the Executive Orders were missiles... An EO reactivating Continuity of Government put military and civil authorities back on constitutional footing... that’s why the Pentagon’s silence is so loud... [they] know the chain of command is no longer fake... A new EO launched the American Sovereign Wealth Fund, signaling the end of foreign control over U.S. assets... no more BlackRock (etc.) gatekeeping... no more IMF leeching... the era of public theft is ending... Another EO banned all DEI programs in federal agencies and public education, a direct hit on the ideological occupation... lower courts tried to block it... that forced the question straight to the Supreme Court... will [they] stand with the 14th Amendment, or stand with Marxist indoctrination? Then came the real test... an EO restoring constitutional law in public funding and education, cutting off all federal dollars to any entity violating 1A, 2A, 10A, or due process... no more censoring parents, no more woke boards hiding behind federal grants... simply put, if you don’t serve the Constitution, you don’t get paid... Every one of these orders was a trigger... Each challenge, a mirror... Each ruling, a confession... And now, SCOTUS is being forced to choose, in full view of the American people... [they] can no longer hide behind “precedent"... [they] either honor the Constitution as written, or [they] expose themselves as compromised... This isn’t random... this is game theory executed with surgical discipline... Trump read the Founders blueprint... he used the Federalist Papers as legal casing... Federalist 78 - The judiciary has “neither force nor will, but merely judgment"... Federalist 81 - Warned against judicial tyranny and unchecked interpretation... Federalist 45 - The federal government’s powers are “few and defined.” The rest belong to the states and the people... He followed the map, and used it to collapse the machine from within... now the whole thing is unraveling... The DOJ is exposed, Merrick Garland sat on child trafficking cases while chasing concerned parents at school board meetings... The FBI is exposed, fabricating FISA warrants to spy on a sitting president, then rigging social media algorithms to bury truth... hiding Hunter laptop... The CIA is exposed, architecting regime-change operations at home, just like they did abroad... The courts are exposed... operating as ideological weapons, not judicial bodies... and now, the Supreme Court is standing at the edge... Rule with the Constitution, or fall with the rest... This was never about Trump being above the law... it was about making the law reveal who is actually beneath it... The Founders built the tools... Trump picked them up... and now the corrupt system... from clerk to chief justice... is standing in the open... Trump didn’t tear it down... He made it destroy itself... One EO at a time... One judge at a time... One ruling at a time... This is The Storm... And the Constitution is the Lightning... BQQM...
6:16

The trap was the constitution and Trump sprung it in broad daylight... [they’ve] been after him since day one... from the moment he descended that golden escalator, the Deep State system activated... Not just political enemies... the entire intelligence community, federal law enforcement, state prosecutors, activist judges, and [their] media handlers... [they] tried to stop him with scandal, smear, indictment, impeachments, gag orders, raids... But [they] missed one critical detail... Trump wasn’t defending himself... he was baiting the system... Every move they made, every case they filed, every lie [they] told... it all became part of the record... he let [them] walk into the trap... and the trap was the Constitution... it started at the local level... They weaponized rogue DAs like Alvin Bragg, who revived a dead misdemeanor case to fabricate a felony... Letitia James ran a civil case so twisted she claimed Trump inflated property values... even though banks were paid, profits were made, and no one complained... Fani Willis indicted Trump for asking a question about election integrity... a question backed by mountains of sworn affidavits, video evidence, and constitutional authority... Every time a judge allowed it, every time a motion was denied, every time a gag order was issued... [they] marked themselves, on paper, for history... Then came the federal tier... Trump’s Executive Orders during his first term were surgical... he wasn’t just undoing Obama’s damage... he was laying constitutional landmines... EO 13765 rolled back Obamacare's mandate enforcement... activist judges rushed to block it, exposing their disregard for legislative process... EO 13818, the sleeper, targeted global human rights violators and allowed for seizure of assets connected to corruption and trafficking... it laid the foundation to financially gut cartel connected officials, even inside the US... EO 13848, triggered by foreign interference in elections, created the legal framework to seize foreign-owned media, tech platforms, and corporate assets... it has never been revoked.... it remains active... EO 13959 blocked American investment in Chinese military companies... hitting the real financial pipeline of globalist control... BlackRock, Statestreet, and Vanguard tried to dance around it... too late... the paper trail is sealed... and every time one of these orders was challenged in court, the ruling told you exactly who the judge served... the Republic, or the Deep State regime... Then came 2025, and Trump didn’t come back to play games... this time, the gloves were off, and the Executive Orders were missiles... An EO reactivating Continuity of Government put military and civil authorities back on constitutional footing... that’s why the Pentagon’s silence is so loud... [they] know the chain of command is no longer fake... A new EO launched the American Sovereign Wealth Fund, signaling the end of foreign control over U.S. assets... no more BlackRock (etc.) gatekeeping... no more IMF leeching... the era of public theft is ending... Another EO banned all DEI programs in federal agencies and public education, a direct hit on the ideological occupation... lower courts tried to block it... that forced the question straight to the Supreme Court... will [they] stand with the 14th Amendment, or stand with Marxist indoctrination? Then came the real test... an EO restoring constitutional law in public funding and education, cutting off all federal dollars to any entity violating 1A, 2A, 10A, or due process... no more censoring parents, no more woke boards hiding behind federal grants... simply put, if you don’t serve the Constitution, you don’t get paid... Every one of these orders was a trigger... Each challenge, a mirror... Each ruling, a confession... And now, SCOTUS is being forced to choose, in full view of the American people... [they] can no longer hide behind “precedent"... [they] either honor the Constitution as written, or [they] expose themselves as compromised... This isn’t random... this is game theory executed with surgical discipline... Trump read the Founders blueprint... he used the Federalist Papers as legal casing... Federalist 78 - The judiciary has “neither force nor will, but merely judgment"... Federalist 81 - Warned against judicial tyranny and unchecked interpretation... Federalist 45 - The federal government’s powers are “few and defined.” The rest belong to the states and the people... He followed the map, and used it to collapse the machine from within... now the whole thing is unraveling... The DOJ is exposed, Merrick Garland sat on child trafficking cases while chasing concerned parents at school board meetings... The FBI is exposed, fabricating FISA warrants to spy on a sitting president, then rigging social media algorithms to bury truth... hiding Hunter laptop... The CIA is exposed, architecting regime-change operations at home, just like they did abroad... The courts are exposed... operating as ideological weapons, not judicial bodies... and now, the Supreme Court is standing at the edge... Rule with the Constitution, or fall with the rest... This was never about Trump being above the law... it was about making the law reveal who is actually beneath it... The Founders built the tools... Trump picked them up... and now the corrupt system... from clerk to chief justice... is standing in the open... Trump didn’t tear it down... He made it destroy itself... One EO at a time... One judge at a time... One ruling at a time... This is The Storm... And the Constitution is the Lightning... BQQM...

Observing Consciousness

135,066 просмотров • 1 год назад

Ladies and gentlemen, if you wanted to see Trudeau’s house of cards start to collapse, yesterdays Question Period was it. What we saw was Liberal arrogance in full bloom, completely detached from the struggles of everyday Canadians. This government, led by Justin Trudeau, is hanging on by a thread, propped up by the NDP and their delusional belief that taxing people into poverty will somehow save the planet. Let’s walk through the insanity that unfolded today. Carbon Tax Insanity: Trudeau’s Cronies Keep Selling the Same Lie First, we had Ben Carr, MP for Winnipeg South Centre, grinning like a man who thinks you’re too stupid to realize what’s happening. He was bragging about Manitobans getting $300 rebates on October 15th, thanks to the Canada Carbon Rebate. And then there’s Jaime Battiste, the Liberal MP for Sydney–Victoria, boasting that Nova Scotians will get $206. Isn’t that great? A few hundred bucks to cover the massive hole the carbon tax is blowing in your wallet. But here’s what they won’t tell you—and what the Conservatives were quick to point out: the Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) has exposed their game. Sure, they give you a couple of crumbs, but by the time Trudeau's carbon tax has fully ramped up, families in Saskatchewan will be $2,000 poorer every year. They want you to focus on a small rebate while they reach into your pocket and take thousands. It’s like robbing you blind and tossing you a handful of change as a consolation prize​​. And the man leading this con? Steven Guilbeault, Trudeau’s Minister of Environment. He had the nerve to selectively quote the PBO report, claiming Canadians will come out ahead. He forgot to mention that, by 2030, you’ll be getting crushed under the weight of this tax, and big polluters—the ones he claims to be targeting—are getting sweetheart deals. This is the Liberal lie at its core: "We’re saving the planet," they say, while making your life unbearable​. Conservatives Hammer the Government on Corruption If that wasn’t enough, Conservative MPs took aim at the NDP-Liberal swamp propping up Trudeau’s latest scandal—this time involving a $400 million slush fund for Liberal insiders. Bob Zimmer, MP for Prince George–Peace River–Northern Rockies, went after Steven Guilbeault again, accusing him of obstructing justice by refusing to turn over documents related to the Sustainable Development Technology Canada fiasco. This is classic Liberal corruption—they take your tax dollars and funnel it straight into their cronies’ pockets, while ordinary Canadians are left wondering how they’ll pay for their heating bills this winter​. Andrew Scheer Takes on the Justice Minister: Liberals Soft on Terrorism At the 20-minute mark, things got even more heated. Andrew Scheer, the MP for Regina—Qu'Appelle, sparred with Justice Minister Arif Virani over the Trudeau government’s failure to act quickly on listing terrorist organizations like the Houthi rebels. Scheer slammed the Liberals for their sluggishness, pointing out that the Houthi group has been responsible for attacks on civilian ships and openly supports violence. Virani fumbled through his response, offering some weak excuse about an "expedited review" process. But Scheer wasn't having it, hammering the government for its typical pattern of inaction. Pro-Houthi protests in Vancouver have already involved chants of "Death to Canada," but still, Trudeau’s government is dragging its feet . This was yet another example of the Liberals’ soft-on-national-security approach, leaving Canadians vulnerable while radicals are allowed to operate freely. Farmers Under Siege: Trudeau’s Tax is Destroying Agriculture But the most jaw-dropping part of the day? That was when John Barlow, MP for Foothills, exposed how Trudeau’s carbon tax is crushing Canadian farmers. He laid it all out: Farmers are already dealing with floods, droughts, and rising costs, and now the carbon tax is driving up fuel prices, making it impossible to survive. Canadian agriculture is on the verge of collapse, but all Guilbeault and Trudeau can do is prattle on about how “climate change” is the real enemy. Here’s the truth, folks: Trudeau’s carbon tax does nothing to reduce emissions, but it devastates farmers and makes your food even more expensive. But Steven Guilbeault? He’s too busy appeasing his eco-radical pals to care​​. Mental Health Day: Liberals Make It Worse with Free Drug Policies We also had Peter Julian, MP for New Westminster–Burnaby, talking about World Mental Health Day, acknowledging the struggles of public safety employees. Now, don’t get me wrong, mental health is important—especially for public safety workers—but let’s talk about the mental health crisis Trudeau’s government is creating with its policies. When people can’t afford their bills, when they’re watching their paychecks get devoured by inflation, and when they see no future because of policies like the carbon tax, it’s no wonder mental health is deteriorating across the board. Yet, the Liberals don’t seem to care—especially when it comes to the disaster in British Columbia, led by David Eby, the NDP Premier. His “safe supply” policy—handing out free drugs to people struggling with addiction—is making things worse, not better. We’re seeing it right now: homelessness is skyrocketing, overdose rates are out of control, and instead of helping people get clean, they’re pushing them deeper into addiction. The Trudeau Liberals support this madness, and guess what? They’re ready to spread this destructive policy nationwide​. The Trudeau Agenda: A Slow, Steady Destruction of Canada Let’s not mince words: Trudeau’s government is a train wreck. They distract you with token rebates, sell you on climate propaganda, and line their pockets while Canada burns. Today’s Question Period showed us how far the rot has gone. The Liberals want you to believe they’re looking out for you while they steal your money, destroy your jobs, and fuel addiction in your communities. And they do it all with a smile, thinking you’ll be too distracted by their virtue-signaling to notice the carnage. Bottom Line: The Trudeau Liberals are playing a dangerous game with Canada’s future. Steven Guilbeault and his carbon tax will bankrupt this country if they get their way. David Eby’s free drug policies will create a nation of addicts. And the NDP-Liberal cartel will keep propping up Trudeau because they know they can’t survive an election where Canadians finally get to have their say. It’s time to take back Canada from these corrupt elites before they’ve destroyed it beyond repair.
6:30

Ladies and gentlemen, if you wanted to see Trudeau’s house of cards start to collapse, yesterdays Question Period was it. What we saw was Liberal arrogance in full bloom, completely detached from the struggles of everyday Canadians. This government, led by Justin Trudeau, is hanging on by a thread, propped up by the NDP and their delusional belief that taxing people into poverty will somehow save the planet. Let’s walk through the insanity that unfolded today. Carbon Tax Insanity: Trudeau’s Cronies Keep Selling the Same Lie First, we had Ben Carr, MP for Winnipeg South Centre, grinning like a man who thinks you’re too stupid to realize what’s happening. He was bragging about Manitobans getting $300 rebates on October 15th, thanks to the Canada Carbon Rebate. And then there’s Jaime Battiste, the Liberal MP for Sydney–Victoria, boasting that Nova Scotians will get $206. Isn’t that great? A few hundred bucks to cover the massive hole the carbon tax is blowing in your wallet. But here’s what they won’t tell you—and what the Conservatives were quick to point out: the Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) has exposed their game. Sure, they give you a couple of crumbs, but by the time Trudeau's carbon tax has fully ramped up, families in Saskatchewan will be $2,000 poorer every year. They want you to focus on a small rebate while they reach into your pocket and take thousands. It’s like robbing you blind and tossing you a handful of change as a consolation prize​​. And the man leading this con? Steven Guilbeault, Trudeau’s Minister of Environment. He had the nerve to selectively quote the PBO report, claiming Canadians will come out ahead. He forgot to mention that, by 2030, you’ll be getting crushed under the weight of this tax, and big polluters—the ones he claims to be targeting—are getting sweetheart deals. This is the Liberal lie at its core: "We’re saving the planet," they say, while making your life unbearable​. Conservatives Hammer the Government on Corruption If that wasn’t enough, Conservative MPs took aim at the NDP-Liberal swamp propping up Trudeau’s latest scandal—this time involving a $400 million slush fund for Liberal insiders. Bob Zimmer, MP for Prince George–Peace River–Northern Rockies, went after Steven Guilbeault again, accusing him of obstructing justice by refusing to turn over documents related to the Sustainable Development Technology Canada fiasco. This is classic Liberal corruption—they take your tax dollars and funnel it straight into their cronies’ pockets, while ordinary Canadians are left wondering how they’ll pay for their heating bills this winter​. Andrew Scheer Takes on the Justice Minister: Liberals Soft on Terrorism At the 20-minute mark, things got even more heated. Andrew Scheer, the MP for Regina—Qu'Appelle, sparred with Justice Minister Arif Virani over the Trudeau government’s failure to act quickly on listing terrorist organizations like the Houthi rebels. Scheer slammed the Liberals for their sluggishness, pointing out that the Houthi group has been responsible for attacks on civilian ships and openly supports violence. Virani fumbled through his response, offering some weak excuse about an "expedited review" process. But Scheer wasn't having it, hammering the government for its typical pattern of inaction. Pro-Houthi protests in Vancouver have already involved chants of "Death to Canada," but still, Trudeau’s government is dragging its feet . This was yet another example of the Liberals’ soft-on-national-security approach, leaving Canadians vulnerable while radicals are allowed to operate freely. Farmers Under Siege: Trudeau’s Tax is Destroying Agriculture But the most jaw-dropping part of the day? That was when John Barlow, MP for Foothills, exposed how Trudeau’s carbon tax is crushing Canadian farmers. He laid it all out: Farmers are already dealing with floods, droughts, and rising costs, and now the carbon tax is driving up fuel prices, making it impossible to survive. Canadian agriculture is on the verge of collapse, but all Guilbeault and Trudeau can do is prattle on about how “climate change” is the real enemy. Here’s the truth, folks: Trudeau’s carbon tax does nothing to reduce emissions, but it devastates farmers and makes your food even more expensive. But Steven Guilbeault? He’s too busy appeasing his eco-radical pals to care​​. Mental Health Day: Liberals Make It Worse with Free Drug Policies We also had Peter Julian, MP for New Westminster–Burnaby, talking about World Mental Health Day, acknowledging the struggles of public safety employees. Now, don’t get me wrong, mental health is important—especially for public safety workers—but let’s talk about the mental health crisis Trudeau’s government is creating with its policies. When people can’t afford their bills, when they’re watching their paychecks get devoured by inflation, and when they see no future because of policies like the carbon tax, it’s no wonder mental health is deteriorating across the board. Yet, the Liberals don’t seem to care—especially when it comes to the disaster in British Columbia, led by David Eby, the NDP Premier. His “safe supply” policy—handing out free drugs to people struggling with addiction—is making things worse, not better. We’re seeing it right now: homelessness is skyrocketing, overdose rates are out of control, and instead of helping people get clean, they’re pushing them deeper into addiction. The Trudeau Liberals support this madness, and guess what? They’re ready to spread this destructive policy nationwide​. The Trudeau Agenda: A Slow, Steady Destruction of Canada Let’s not mince words: Trudeau’s government is a train wreck. They distract you with token rebates, sell you on climate propaganda, and line their pockets while Canada burns. Today’s Question Period showed us how far the rot has gone. The Liberals want you to believe they’re looking out for you while they steal your money, destroy your jobs, and fuel addiction in your communities. And they do it all with a smile, thinking you’ll be too distracted by their virtue-signaling to notice the carnage. Bottom Line: The Trudeau Liberals are playing a dangerous game with Canada’s future. Steven Guilbeault and his carbon tax will bankrupt this country if they get their way. David Eby’s free drug policies will create a nation of addicts. And the NDP-Liberal cartel will keep propping up Trudeau because they know they can’t survive an election where Canadians finally get to have their say. It’s time to take back Canada from these corrupt elites before they’ve destroyed it beyond repair.

Dan Knight

101,041 просмотров • 1 год назад

Why We Show Up for Zeudi To some, it might appear extreme: crossing oceans, reshuffling days, taking leave, losing sleep, all for a contestant on a reality show. Those who ask "why?" perhaps have never known what it is to exist quietly at life’s margins: unheard, unseen, unchosen. When Zeudi Di Palma entered the #GrandeFratello house at 23, she was just a sociology student anticipating a carefree adventure. She arrived without strategy, without powerful agencies backing her, just herself: authentic, compassionate, curious, principled. Yet what unfolded was anything but carefree. Slowly, painfully, she found herself at the center of an unintended social experiment. She, the student, became the study itself without ever consenting. Love, when it emerged, was tangled in manipulation and confusion. Her bisexuality dissected, doubted, and derided. Her presence threatened fragile egos, her gentle nature was twisted into cunning strategy. Week after week, she faced not empathy but hostility, indifference, and silence. No one in that house (except Chiara) stood between her and the storm. No voice from production acknowledged the injustice. No hand reached out as she visibly crumbled. So, we stepped forward. We did what they refused to do: We showed up. Because the world outside witnessed clearly what those inside chose to ignore. People from over 130 countries -many places where queerness is not just judged but criminalized- recognized in Zeudi a quiet rebellion: a resistance that does not scream, yet refuses to yield. Some journey across seas not for recognition or fleeting applause, but to reclaim dignity: hers, and ours. Even if she never lays eyes on us, even if we never appear on their screens, our presence is a clear and resonant declaration: You didn’t imagine it. We saw what they did. We heard what they refused to hear. And we stand here, entirely for you. ♥️ Those unable to travel are no less present. They are the sleepless ones, the dedicated voters juggling second phones and VPNs, the translators, the writers, the organizers. They are voices fiercely loving Zeudi in a world urging her silence. Others.. They brand us delusional, dismiss us as bots, label us toxic. But this isn’t fandom, it’s collective defiance. It is a chorus insisting: If the world abandons someone like Zeudi, we will embody the world that refuses to. Yet, it’s not only about her. It’s about every soul courageous enough to remain genuine in spaces rewarding cruelty. It’s for quiet kids hidden in shadows, taught kindness is weakness. For queer youth who watched Miss Italy the graceful, gentle, proud, be erased and thought: If someone like her can vanish, what hope remains for me? This is for them as well. To affirm: You matter. You may be attacked, but you will be defended. Misunderstood, yet deeply seen. Because Zeudi was, and so too are you. She didn’t become a symbol through ambition, but through necessity. They forced her solitude, forced her to stand alone and still, she stood. Perhaps she’ll glimpse the crowd outside the studio. Perhaps not. But she will feel it. One way or another, she will know. Zeudi has lived a lifetime overlooked: never the first chosen, never the favored one. But today, people travel thousands of miles, take sick days, rearrange their lives, and reach out to strangers for votes, rewriting this narrative completely. Today, she is our first choice. No matter the outcome of that finale, nothing can take this truth away from her. #Zeudiners #ZEUDICRASH Zeudiners | Jenlisa | Taylor Swift Mariarosaria
0:33

Why We Show Up for Zeudi To some, it might appear extreme: crossing oceans, reshuffling days, taking leave, losing sleep, all for a contestant on a reality show. Those who ask "why?" perhaps have never known what it is to exist quietly at life’s margins: unheard, unseen, unchosen. When Zeudi Di Palma entered the #GrandeFratello house at 23, she was just a sociology student anticipating a carefree adventure. She arrived without strategy, without powerful agencies backing her, just herself: authentic, compassionate, curious, principled. Yet what unfolded was anything but carefree. Slowly, painfully, she found herself at the center of an unintended social experiment. She, the student, became the study itself without ever consenting. Love, when it emerged, was tangled in manipulation and confusion. Her bisexuality dissected, doubted, and derided. Her presence threatened fragile egos, her gentle nature was twisted into cunning strategy. Week after week, she faced not empathy but hostility, indifference, and silence. No one in that house (except Chiara) stood between her and the storm. No voice from production acknowledged the injustice. No hand reached out as she visibly crumbled. So, we stepped forward. We did what they refused to do: We showed up. Because the world outside witnessed clearly what those inside chose to ignore. People from over 130 countries -many places where queerness is not just judged but criminalized- recognized in Zeudi a quiet rebellion: a resistance that does not scream, yet refuses to yield. Some journey across seas not for recognition or fleeting applause, but to reclaim dignity: hers, and ours. Even if she never lays eyes on us, even if we never appear on their screens, our presence is a clear and resonant declaration: You didn’t imagine it. We saw what they did. We heard what they refused to hear. And we stand here, entirely for you. ♥️ Those unable to travel are no less present. They are the sleepless ones, the dedicated voters juggling second phones and VPNs, the translators, the writers, the organizers. They are voices fiercely loving Zeudi in a world urging her silence. Others.. They brand us delusional, dismiss us as bots, label us toxic. But this isn’t fandom, it’s collective defiance. It is a chorus insisting: If the world abandons someone like Zeudi, we will embody the world that refuses to. Yet, it’s not only about her. It’s about every soul courageous enough to remain genuine in spaces rewarding cruelty. It’s for quiet kids hidden in shadows, taught kindness is weakness. For queer youth who watched Miss Italy the graceful, gentle, proud, be erased and thought: If someone like her can vanish, what hope remains for me? This is for them as well. To affirm: You matter. You may be attacked, but you will be defended. Misunderstood, yet deeply seen. Because Zeudi was, and so too are you. She didn’t become a symbol through ambition, but through necessity. They forced her solitude, forced her to stand alone and still, she stood. Perhaps she’ll glimpse the crowd outside the studio. Perhaps not. But she will feel it. One way or another, she will know. Zeudi has lived a lifetime overlooked: never the first chosen, never the favored one. But today, people travel thousands of miles, take sick days, rearrange their lives, and reach out to strangers for votes, rewriting this narrative completely. Today, she is our first choice. No matter the outcome of that finale, nothing can take this truth away from her. #Zeudiners #ZEUDICRASH Zeudiners | Jenlisa | Taylor Swift Mariarosaria

whatever

31,082 просмотров • 1 год назад

"I have graphs, I've looked at the Google Analytics, the data does not lie. Every single time, starting in April 2024, that Jen McCabe would become the subject of public attention --It happens at specific discrete moments on the timeline-- you see a bump in the attention paid to Lindsey Gaetani." "And there's no doubt in my mind that Brian Tully's MSP unit --when they had Michael Morrissey make that video, when McCabe's friends or family or whatever, when they all got him to make that video, and that didn't work, and when Morrissey had to recuse, when things got so bad that they had no other out, and the TurtleRiders would not pay attention to anyone but those Karen Read and John O'Keefe witnesses-- Tully, Kate Peter and their people said, "all right, we're left with no other option. Lindsey Gaetani looks like a good distraction. Let's release her phone." And then that cycle repeated over and over and over and over again. And Lindsey's not the only one who's been subject to this. You wanna talk about what's going on to Estey? Even what's going on with Deanna? With Meredith?" TRANSCRIPT: And people wonder why I get so passionate about this. This is nothing I haven't talked about before, but you are not gonna tell me, me, of all people --I'm not gonna speak for Lindsey-- but you are not gonna tell me that the release of Lindsey Gaetani's cell phone extraction did not have serious, serious ramifications. Like, I can't even conceptualize what the impact was on Lindsey and her family's life. I don't think my life was ever the same again after April of 2024. As traumatized as I was from that December 2023 court hearing, what happened in April of 2024 was the worst thing that I have ever seen happen to any human being in my entire life. [Speaking to chat] Oh, hi Lindsey, how are you? I've just never seen anything that horrific, the leak of that cell phone extraction, the impact that it had, the fact that no one even understood how severe it was because people were so distracted by the polemics of it. People were so "excited" to be able to smear Lindsey and the distraction was so powerful that no one asked, one, why did this happen? Or two, what was the impact? And that's what really got me so passionate and furious about this. It wasn't an issue of substantive guilt or innocence about anyone. It was that I was seeing the same exact stuff happen in this situation to people without political connections that I saw happen to the staff of the CCC when really powerful men started getting very, very, very close to each other in positions of power and then when they would do bad things to women, they would just talk to each other. One guy would run the HR department, the other guy would run the executive director position, and somebody else would have a connection to the appointing authority. And so any complaint would just be what's called "caught and killed." And I said, there is no way that this is gonna happen again. When it was happening in the CCC, it was an administrative regulatory agency. At least there was some sort of semblance of check and balance. It wasn't egregious because everyone had a lot of influence, even the people who were staffers. This situation, we had state police officers, people who, if you were listening to the just the narrative of the people who were supporting the Justice for John O'Keefe movement, you would think that Michael Proctor's infallible. You would think Brian Tully's infallible. You would think Kate Peter's infallible, which means incapable of fault. That's nonsense. I'm telling you right now, that's nonsense, and that's why it was so easy for this stuff to manifest. And that's why I became so personally concerned. Forget about what developed from April to April of 2024 until now. That's why I was so upset because I watched what happened from December of 2023 through to April of 2024. And that enough was so egregious, so wrong, such an abuse of trust, such an abuse of the justice system that I said, there is no way that I can just stand by and be apathetic about this, no matter what the price, no matter what the obstacles, no matter what the pressures. And I can't tell you how bad it was --it tore families apart, these cases-- if you didn't live through it. It tore communities apart. I don't believe anyone in Massachusetts around this area, 128 or Dedham or whatever, was able to live a life that was not impacted in some way by this case. Okay, these cases, the TurtleBoy case, Karen Read case, et cetera, et cetera. It frustrates me to no end that somehow within that high-profile situation, there were people who started to control the narrative because they had things to hide. And that's why I started this space, because I truly believe that the real secrets lying beneath what was really going on with Michael Proctor and Brian Tully and Kate Peter and the PI, Marty Kraft and Jen McCabe and Yuri Bukhenik and John Fanning and Nick Guarino. What I really believe was going on was that they were worried that the attention brought onto that unit by the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case was gonna spill their secrets about Birchmore. And it led them to double down and commit even more egregious acts in the context of some of this other behavior, like leaking Lindsey Gaetani's cell phone extraction. And that's, again, you wanna talk about the timeline from April 2024 until now, we can do that too. But what I'll tell you is the story ends up being the same. I have graphs, I've looked at the Google Analytics, the data does not lie. Every single time starting in April 2024, that Jen McCabe would become the subject of public attention. It happens at specific, specific discrete moments on the timeline. You see a bump in the attention paid to Lindsey. And there's no doubt in my mind that this unit, when they had Michael Morrissey make that video, when McCabe's friends or family or whatever, when they all got him to make that video, and that didn't work. When Morrissey had to recuse, when things got so bad that they had no other out and the TurtleRiders would not pay attention to anyone but those Karen Read and John O'Keefe witnesses, Tully and his people said, "all right, we're left with no other option. Lindsey Gaetani looks like a good distraction. Let's release her phone." And then that cycle repeated over and over and over and over again. And Lindsey's not the only one who's been subject to this. You wanna talk about what's going on to Estey? Even what's going on with Deanna? With Meredith? What's going on with a lot of these people, right? There were PIs and moles in the internet saying that Lindsey was that and separating that. There were PIs, moles and various people in the end, just sort of people who were trying to either support Karen or support a movement that they could believe in or whatever it was, who got exploited, who got ran by various people for intel purposes to feed information back to their various handlers. And when they became expendable, they got burned. You watch, look at these emails sent to all these people's schools, the mass emails. That can't be a coincidence. Whoever it benefits can't be a coincidence, all right? It's a coordinated tactic. It's designed to put public attention on very specific people when otherwise damaging information gets released. And what have we seen over the past, let's say from April 2024 until now, what have we seen? That over and over and over again, all right? Every time something would happen, there'd be a new distraction. And then as we got through the end of the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case, what did we see? Yes, there were some real, real secrets lying beneath in terms of this case. And I mean it, I mean it with every bone and fiber in my towel body. There were secrets about the Birchmore case. There were secrets about that phone extraction. There were secrets about the inside baseball and the communications between Tully and Kate and Tully and Jen McCabe and Michael Morrissey and Kate and Michael Morrissey and Jen McCabe. And as it all started to come out and as it crescendoed folks over the past few months to the point where Michael Proctor's own attorney was basically making misrepresentations to the court about the existence of 12 years of cell phone records. When he had Kate Peter deleting evidence from Google Drives that were submitted as formal records to grand juries in the Kearney proceedings. When you have a special prosecutor statute that is so broken, it allows a DA rather than complying with the court order to appoint a new special prosecutor to just no-cross cases. So that stuff like what we've been talking about doesn't come out. It's indefensible. But what is the karmic justice here? It is that for whatever reason, Michael Proctor's cell phone records which I truly believe were captured and swept up by the feds during their federal probe of either Farwell or Tully's unit or John O'Keefe's death, whatever it was, exposing a lot of this. It's not just the Rule 14 discovery related to Kate Peter and otherwise and Tully that was turned over in the Aidan Kearney case, the 5,000 pages of material. Initially 4,000 pages of it was mysteriously just blank. It's not just that folks. It's also the, hey, Michael Proctor's cell phone until months ago, August of 2025 was hidden from the public. It was hidden from criminal defendants until someone somewhere must have informed Michael Proctor that a full copy of that cell phone already existed so there was no point in him continuing to hide it. What does this speak to? Well, it speaks to why I started this space today because in light of everything I just laid out from memory. I wanted to see if there was a single person who would be willing to stand up here and defend Michael Proctor's state police unit, Ryan Tully, John Fanning, Yuri Bukhenik, any of them or Kate Peter or Jen McCabe. Not because of their actions necessarily in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case but because of everything I just laid out and the silence would let it speak volumes because how are you possibly going to counter any of that? This is what I'm doing from memory sitting here while trying to challenge people to a debate. That is just a part of the historical record. I cannot put into words how much more expansive in scope some of this story is and it's not any one person's story to tell. Let me also go on a rant about this. I'm getting so frustrated with the possessive approach that some people take to some of this coverage. Do you care about what was done to the most vulnerable? I don't care if you think of Karen as vulnerable, Lindsey is vulnerable, Sandra Birchmore is vulnerable, whoever you think of as vulnerable. Do you care about what happened to them? Do you care about righting the wrongs? Do you care about actually talking about the misconduct or are you trying to make a polemical point in furtherance of some specific platform that either you run or you support? What are you trying to accomplish? And I think a lot of us recently have been forced to have some very difficult moral reckoning. Okay, because a lot of us were tricked. I felt absolutely tricked into supporting Michael Proctor. If I knew, I'm not saying about the merits of the John O'Keefe investigation. If I knew then, back in 2023, 2024, what I know now about what's on that phone and about what that unit was willing to do, I never would have supported them. We supported Lindsey, but I never would have supported that unit. I'm sorry. Nope, never would have done it. And that's why I want to talk about people became very possessive about coverage of this case. Reporters are supposed to fade into the background. It's not supposed to be about us. Yes, maybe you have some skills. The reporter, people are interested. You use those skills to get a following so you can tell a story and get the facts out there, but it's not supposed to be about us. If a reporter is the centerpiece of a story, they have failed. Okay, you just blend in the background. We make sure that the people who are the most harmed, their voices are centered. And then we make sure these predatory vultures, like Kate Peter, are unable to manipulate public narratives to protect entrenched systemic power structures. That's what it's all about. So for me, that's why I get so frustrated. That's why I wanted to do this space because I wanted to make a point that when forced to actually debate on merit, all the propaganda mouthpieces will run from the chance. They're happy to get up and shit talk other people when it's a space they control, and they don't have to address the merits. But you put them in a position where they don't control the space and they're forced to debate on merit and they'll run from it. So in some sense, I made my point. But I also think it's an important exercise in telling this story, in explaining where I'm coming from. I think there are a lot of us that are all coming to the same position, which is it doesn't matter what various camp we may have been in or what not. We're not defined by that. We are just individual humans who have a bunch of views on different cases. And at the end of the day, a lot of us, more so, I think than people realize, actually care about systemic reform. We're not in it to protect Kate Peter or Jen McCabe or Brian Tully or anybody. We're here to hold people to equal standards and ask that the justice system do the same. And I think that's a noble goal. That's something that I can believe in. I wish people would be willing to debate it, though. It frustrates me. It really frustrates me. And, you know, maybe that's the nature of it. Maybe it's that making this point requires showing the litany of evidence, showing the sort of timeline, showing the overlapping concentric social circles, talking about these people, talking about what they did, talking about the implications, talking about where this is going. That's what cuts out the propaganda. To me, everyone is capable of fault. I said this the other day. If there are people out there in your orbit who are telling you that they are incapable of fault, they're a threat to the United States. They're the most dangerous, pernicious force we can imagine. Everyone's capable of fault. And we should look to the people who, in spite of their faults, try to leave the world a better place than what they found when they arrived. I think there are those of us. In spite of absolutely inculcating incredible odds who have somehow managed to get to a point where we've centered the voices, we're not there yet, where we're centering the voices who are actually impacted by all this. And if that happens, mark my words, it will not be because of any large media platforms or networks or anything. It will be in spite of them. It will be in spite of their impact inside dealing in spite of the documentary contracts, in spite of the news networks. It will be because a small group of well-meaning people were willing to band together and say, everything else aside, we can stand behind what's right. It may not be a form of right that we all agree on, but starting from that place, instead of from a place of hatred or otherwise, is a good step. I don't know where this is going. I don't know where it's going. I know that no one will stand up here and defend Kate Peter and Brian Tully, at least in a debate with me where I control the playing field. Can you blame them? But I don't know where this is going. You're on my prediction. As someone who's, I think I've not lived this as much as some other people, but I've lived it a lot. It's been a lot. And I'm never gonna understand the impact that this had on the people who had directly impacted, but it's been a lot on a lot of people. The story has impacted many lives. Even myself, with the perspective I have, kind of sitting back here on my veranda, you can call me Thomas Jefferson Towel. I don't have any hemp though, or do I? Sitting on my veranda, kind of looking forward, right here, all right? I got my public records request back today. I know when a public records request denial is like, oh, we want to stonewall this because there's something there. And I'm getting that vibe related to the contacts between the Norfolk DA's office and the Mass AGO's office between September 25th and October 24th of 2025 related to whether the Norfolk DA reached out to appoint a new special prosecutor in the Lindsey Gaetani and Aidan Kearney cases. But as I'm sitting here on my veranda with my eyes closed, I don't have a veranda. I have a desk. I'm a little towel. As I'm sitting here with my eyes closed, I can see the future materializing, okay? There's only certain roads that this can go down. There are only so many pathways left. There's a reckoning coming, folks. Whether it's a reckoning by way of the Sandra Birchmore cover-up, whether it's a reckoning by way of Michael Proctor's attempt to hide a substantial amount of evidence across a substantial number of criminal cases, whether it's related to Kate Peter's involvement in the handling of evidence in the still remaining Aidan Kearney cases. You can sense the anticipation. You can sense the apprehension and anxiety. And you can sense imminent closure. I'm not saying that is gonna be an easy process. I'm not saying it's gonna be a short process. But I'm saying there's something in the air. It's undeniable. There's little left to defend. There's not a single person, troll or otherwise anonymous account or whatever, who would stand up here today right now and with me and try to defend Kate Peter and Brian Tully. I gave you the chance. There's a time, if I had done this space a year ago, oh, people would have been jumping at the bit. No one will do it. No one. Why? Because we're at the end of the road. What Proctor did was indefensible, not in the Read O'Keefe case, although he should never have used those words about Karen. I'd critique him if he was a private citizen, although obviously I'm protective of women, right? But say what you will about that. I wouldn't use those words in private. That man used them in his capacity as a police officer. Right? Not to mention the other defendants' cases that were impacted by whatever Proctor and Sean Goode and whoever else was on that text chain and whatever else is on that phone is gonna lead to. You can sense it. You can sense the reckoning coming. The question is, back to Watergate in the '70s, there was a member of the House of Representatives during the impeachment hearings in '74. We had a very famous phrase. "What did the President know and when did he know?" Folks, the phrase of our era will be, "What did Michael Morrissey know and when did he know it?" This cannot start and end with justice for any single person involved in this. This is not about any one person at this point. This is about a system of justice in Massachusetts that I suppose was not about justice long before any of us realized it was teetering on the brink of collapse. Annie Dookhan was a warning that we all ignored to our peril. I should have seen it when they somehow got Lindsey that same lawyer that Annie Dookhan had. I should have seen it. It's not—I didn't realize until last week that lawyer George was a handler. Dookhan could create a huge—it could have created huge exposure for some people in the state police. It's incredible. If somebody painted the picture of the power structure that was at play here. Karen Read, when she said she was afraid of these people, I didn't—when she said it in the text or something and somebody leaked it. When I first started covering this case, I would not have got it. I don't know what it had been like. What do you mean? They're a state police unit. Like, yeah, they're paramilitary. Like, if you're a criminal, you should fear them, but they're not scary. Right now, after some of the stuff, and I'm talking about half the stuff I've seen as people pull, they horrifying. I think they're cornered, by the way. I don't think there's much they can do. They're getting a little desperate, burning a lot of their agents and their moles. And that's why I sense some kind of reckoning coming. You don't burn deep cover moles. I think Deanna was a mole for Kate for a while. You don't burn somebody like that unless it's almost over. Same thing with Kristy, the way Kristy's been burning everybody. I don't know who the hell she was working for, but whatever she's doing has got to be close to over because you don't burn everybody down unless it's almost over. So why is it almost over, folks? Why? What's coming? Some combination of all of this stuff. And if you want my fundamental prediction, let me give it to you like this. I don't like that it's coming to this, but it's a political question. It's a question of what the narrative is going to be. You don't just, as everyone now knows, you don't just prosecute people because they do things wrong. There's always a decision tree. So what do the feds want out of this? The people who were involved in the cover-up of Sandra Birchmore's murder, whoever was the father of Sandra's unborn child, you know, it's not that Matt Farwell. Well, and then they obviously want this MSP unit. Okay, Michael Proctor, that cell phone, didn't just get cloned. It was a setup. They let Proctor lie to the judge about all those cases and all the cell phone records. And as soon as his lawyer filed the document, they moved on him. He must be under federal investigation. How did Aidan Kearney get those text messages from Jen McCabe to KF and Allie McCabe? Those were removed from Jen McCabe's extraction. The feds cloned her phone too, just like Aidan told Lindsey in those text messages as part of Exhibit O from November 28, 2023. Why did the feds clone Jen McCabe's phone? To see what Jen would withhold in the Rule 14 process. She didn't get banged up on charges federally, so she must have not done anything that bad. Something, however, is going to happen to Proctor, in turn, legally on the federal level. You can sense it. You can sense it. They're going to indict him. But for what? But then it leaves Tully, which was what this whole stream is about. We have the email from Tully. Forget about whether it's normal procedure for Tully to instruct Proctor to look into all the defense witnesses. We now know that Proctor was not running that case. It was Tully. It was all Brian Tully. What was the meme that I put up today? I really like this one. It says, the nine most terrifying words in the English language are, "I'm Brian Tully and I'm here to help." Attributed to Ronald Reagan. My point is though, it was Brian Tully. Look at it. Kate was his little, I don't know, what do we want to call, how can we say this nicely? You know, I'm trying to rise above and encourage more reasonable, respectful discourse. So Kate was his little, this is so hard. All right, let me, let me say a prayer here. Come on, now you can do this. Okay. So, there are so many words I want to use. Kate was his little assistant. I know, I know. You were expecting something wonderful. Every single thing that I was going to say there was going to be cruel, so I'm sorry. Kate was his little assistant, his little PI there. And then, I'm going to turn it around, nightmare PI Moms, version 2, Kate Peter, Jen McCabe, let's go down the seaport. Kate Peter was his little PI until he was quarterbacking all this. I think it was Morrissey who was even cut out of the loop a little bit, although I'm not sure he wasn't more involved than I'm willing to say right now. And you can see why it happened. Because when Morrissey recused in October of 2023 from the Aidan Kearney cases, and what became the Aidan Kearney and Karen Read investigations that are still ongoing, he didn't really recuse. He just had Tully and Kate running it. I started to wonder if Jen McCabe was like a PI for a case she was a witness on. I'm really starting to wonder that.
27:21

"I have graphs, I've looked at the Google Analytics, the data does not lie. Every single time, starting in April 2024, that Jen McCabe would become the subject of public attention --It happens at specific discrete moments on the timeline-- you see a bump in the attention paid to Lindsey Gaetani." "And there's no doubt in my mind that Brian Tully's MSP unit --when they had Michael Morrissey make that video, when McCabe's friends or family or whatever, when they all got him to make that video, and that didn't work, and when Morrissey had to recuse, when things got so bad that they had no other out, and the TurtleRiders would not pay attention to anyone but those Karen Read and John O'Keefe witnesses-- Tully, Kate Peter and their people said, "all right, we're left with no other option. Lindsey Gaetani looks like a good distraction. Let's release her phone." And then that cycle repeated over and over and over and over again. And Lindsey's not the only one who's been subject to this. You wanna talk about what's going on to Estey? Even what's going on with Deanna? With Meredith?" TRANSCRIPT: And people wonder why I get so passionate about this. This is nothing I haven't talked about before, but you are not gonna tell me, me, of all people --I'm not gonna speak for Lindsey-- but you are not gonna tell me that the release of Lindsey Gaetani's cell phone extraction did not have serious, serious ramifications. Like, I can't even conceptualize what the impact was on Lindsey and her family's life. I don't think my life was ever the same again after April of 2024. As traumatized as I was from that December 2023 court hearing, what happened in April of 2024 was the worst thing that I have ever seen happen to any human being in my entire life. [Speaking to chat] Oh, hi Lindsey, how are you? I've just never seen anything that horrific, the leak of that cell phone extraction, the impact that it had, the fact that no one even understood how severe it was because people were so distracted by the polemics of it. People were so "excited" to be able to smear Lindsey and the distraction was so powerful that no one asked, one, why did this happen? Or two, what was the impact? And that's what really got me so passionate and furious about this. It wasn't an issue of substantive guilt or innocence about anyone. It was that I was seeing the same exact stuff happen in this situation to people without political connections that I saw happen to the staff of the CCC when really powerful men started getting very, very, very close to each other in positions of power and then when they would do bad things to women, they would just talk to each other. One guy would run the HR department, the other guy would run the executive director position, and somebody else would have a connection to the appointing authority. And so any complaint would just be what's called "caught and killed." And I said, there is no way that this is gonna happen again. When it was happening in the CCC, it was an administrative regulatory agency. At least there was some sort of semblance of check and balance. It wasn't egregious because everyone had a lot of influence, even the people who were staffers. This situation, we had state police officers, people who, if you were listening to the just the narrative of the people who were supporting the Justice for John O'Keefe movement, you would think that Michael Proctor's infallible. You would think Brian Tully's infallible. You would think Kate Peter's infallible, which means incapable of fault. That's nonsense. I'm telling you right now, that's nonsense, and that's why it was so easy for this stuff to manifest. And that's why I became so personally concerned. Forget about what developed from April to April of 2024 until now. That's why I was so upset because I watched what happened from December of 2023 through to April of 2024. And that enough was so egregious, so wrong, such an abuse of trust, such an abuse of the justice system that I said, there is no way that I can just stand by and be apathetic about this, no matter what the price, no matter what the obstacles, no matter what the pressures. And I can't tell you how bad it was --it tore families apart, these cases-- if you didn't live through it. It tore communities apart. I don't believe anyone in Massachusetts around this area, 128 or Dedham or whatever, was able to live a life that was not impacted in some way by this case. Okay, these cases, the TurtleBoy case, Karen Read case, et cetera, et cetera. It frustrates me to no end that somehow within that high-profile situation, there were people who started to control the narrative because they had things to hide. And that's why I started this space, because I truly believe that the real secrets lying beneath what was really going on with Michael Proctor and Brian Tully and Kate Peter and the PI, Marty Kraft and Jen McCabe and Yuri Bukhenik and John Fanning and Nick Guarino. What I really believe was going on was that they were worried that the attention brought onto that unit by the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case was gonna spill their secrets about Birchmore. And it led them to double down and commit even more egregious acts in the context of some of this other behavior, like leaking Lindsey Gaetani's cell phone extraction. And that's, again, you wanna talk about the timeline from April 2024 until now, we can do that too. But what I'll tell you is the story ends up being the same. I have graphs, I've looked at the Google Analytics, the data does not lie. Every single time starting in April 2024, that Jen McCabe would become the subject of public attention. It happens at specific, specific discrete moments on the timeline. You see a bump in the attention paid to Lindsey. And there's no doubt in my mind that this unit, when they had Michael Morrissey make that video, when McCabe's friends or family or whatever, when they all got him to make that video, and that didn't work. When Morrissey had to recuse, when things got so bad that they had no other out and the TurtleRiders would not pay attention to anyone but those Karen Read and John O'Keefe witnesses, Tully and his people said, "all right, we're left with no other option. Lindsey Gaetani looks like a good distraction. Let's release her phone." And then that cycle repeated over and over and over and over again. And Lindsey's not the only one who's been subject to this. You wanna talk about what's going on to Estey? Even what's going on with Deanna? With Meredith? What's going on with a lot of these people, right? There were PIs and moles in the internet saying that Lindsey was that and separating that. There were PIs, moles and various people in the end, just sort of people who were trying to either support Karen or support a movement that they could believe in or whatever it was, who got exploited, who got ran by various people for intel purposes to feed information back to their various handlers. And when they became expendable, they got burned. You watch, look at these emails sent to all these people's schools, the mass emails. That can't be a coincidence. Whoever it benefits can't be a coincidence, all right? It's a coordinated tactic. It's designed to put public attention on very specific people when otherwise damaging information gets released. And what have we seen over the past, let's say from April 2024 until now, what have we seen? That over and over and over again, all right? Every time something would happen, there'd be a new distraction. And then as we got through the end of the Karen Read and John O'Keefe case, what did we see? Yes, there were some real, real secrets lying beneath in terms of this case. And I mean it, I mean it with every bone and fiber in my towel body. There were secrets about the Birchmore case. There were secrets about that phone extraction. There were secrets about the inside baseball and the communications between Tully and Kate and Tully and Jen McCabe and Michael Morrissey and Kate and Michael Morrissey and Jen McCabe. And as it all started to come out and as it crescendoed folks over the past few months to the point where Michael Proctor's own attorney was basically making misrepresentations to the court about the existence of 12 years of cell phone records. When he had Kate Peter deleting evidence from Google Drives that were submitted as formal records to grand juries in the Kearney proceedings. When you have a special prosecutor statute that is so broken, it allows a DA rather than complying with the court order to appoint a new special prosecutor to just no-cross cases. So that stuff like what we've been talking about doesn't come out. It's indefensible. But what is the karmic justice here? It is that for whatever reason, Michael Proctor's cell phone records which I truly believe were captured and swept up by the feds during their federal probe of either Farwell or Tully's unit or John O'Keefe's death, whatever it was, exposing a lot of this. It's not just the Rule 14 discovery related to Kate Peter and otherwise and Tully that was turned over in the Aidan Kearney case, the 5,000 pages of material. Initially 4,000 pages of it was mysteriously just blank. It's not just that folks. It's also the, hey, Michael Proctor's cell phone until months ago, August of 2025 was hidden from the public. It was hidden from criminal defendants until someone somewhere must have informed Michael Proctor that a full copy of that cell phone already existed so there was no point in him continuing to hide it. What does this speak to? Well, it speaks to why I started this space today because in light of everything I just laid out from memory. I wanted to see if there was a single person who would be willing to stand up here and defend Michael Proctor's state police unit, Ryan Tully, John Fanning, Yuri Bukhenik, any of them or Kate Peter or Jen McCabe. Not because of their actions necessarily in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read case but because of everything I just laid out and the silence would let it speak volumes because how are you possibly going to counter any of that? This is what I'm doing from memory sitting here while trying to challenge people to a debate. That is just a part of the historical record. I cannot put into words how much more expansive in scope some of this story is and it's not any one person's story to tell. Let me also go on a rant about this. I'm getting so frustrated with the possessive approach that some people take to some of this coverage. Do you care about what was done to the most vulnerable? I don't care if you think of Karen as vulnerable, Lindsey is vulnerable, Sandra Birchmore is vulnerable, whoever you think of as vulnerable. Do you care about what happened to them? Do you care about righting the wrongs? Do you care about actually talking about the misconduct or are you trying to make a polemical point in furtherance of some specific platform that either you run or you support? What are you trying to accomplish? And I think a lot of us recently have been forced to have some very difficult moral reckoning. Okay, because a lot of us were tricked. I felt absolutely tricked into supporting Michael Proctor. If I knew, I'm not saying about the merits of the John O'Keefe investigation. If I knew then, back in 2023, 2024, what I know now about what's on that phone and about what that unit was willing to do, I never would have supported them. We supported Lindsey, but I never would have supported that unit. I'm sorry. Nope, never would have done it. And that's why I want to talk about people became very possessive about coverage of this case. Reporters are supposed to fade into the background. It's not supposed to be about us. Yes, maybe you have some skills. The reporter, people are interested. You use those skills to get a following so you can tell a story and get the facts out there, but it's not supposed to be about us. If a reporter is the centerpiece of a story, they have failed. Okay, you just blend in the background. We make sure that the people who are the most harmed, their voices are centered. And then we make sure these predatory vultures, like Kate Peter, are unable to manipulate public narratives to protect entrenched systemic power structures. That's what it's all about. So for me, that's why I get so frustrated. That's why I wanted to do this space because I wanted to make a point that when forced to actually debate on merit, all the propaganda mouthpieces will run from the chance. They're happy to get up and shit talk other people when it's a space they control, and they don't have to address the merits. But you put them in a position where they don't control the space and they're forced to debate on merit and they'll run from it. So in some sense, I made my point. But I also think it's an important exercise in telling this story, in explaining where I'm coming from. I think there are a lot of us that are all coming to the same position, which is it doesn't matter what various camp we may have been in or what not. We're not defined by that. We are just individual humans who have a bunch of views on different cases. And at the end of the day, a lot of us, more so, I think than people realize, actually care about systemic reform. We're not in it to protect Kate Peter or Jen McCabe or Brian Tully or anybody. We're here to hold people to equal standards and ask that the justice system do the same. And I think that's a noble goal. That's something that I can believe in. I wish people would be willing to debate it, though. It frustrates me. It really frustrates me. And, you know, maybe that's the nature of it. Maybe it's that making this point requires showing the litany of evidence, showing the sort of timeline, showing the overlapping concentric social circles, talking about these people, talking about what they did, talking about the implications, talking about where this is going. That's what cuts out the propaganda. To me, everyone is capable of fault. I said this the other day. If there are people out there in your orbit who are telling you that they are incapable of fault, they're a threat to the United States. They're the most dangerous, pernicious force we can imagine. Everyone's capable of fault. And we should look to the people who, in spite of their faults, try to leave the world a better place than what they found when they arrived. I think there are those of us. In spite of absolutely inculcating incredible odds who have somehow managed to get to a point where we've centered the voices, we're not there yet, where we're centering the voices who are actually impacted by all this. And if that happens, mark my words, it will not be because of any large media platforms or networks or anything. It will be in spite of them. It will be in spite of their impact inside dealing in spite of the documentary contracts, in spite of the news networks. It will be because a small group of well-meaning people were willing to band together and say, everything else aside, we can stand behind what's right. It may not be a form of right that we all agree on, but starting from that place, instead of from a place of hatred or otherwise, is a good step. I don't know where this is going. I don't know where it's going. I know that no one will stand up here and defend Kate Peter and Brian Tully, at least in a debate with me where I control the playing field. Can you blame them? But I don't know where this is going. You're on my prediction. As someone who's, I think I've not lived this as much as some other people, but I've lived it a lot. It's been a lot. And I'm never gonna understand the impact that this had on the people who had directly impacted, but it's been a lot on a lot of people. The story has impacted many lives. Even myself, with the perspective I have, kind of sitting back here on my veranda, you can call me Thomas Jefferson Towel. I don't have any hemp though, or do I? Sitting on my veranda, kind of looking forward, right here, all right? I got my public records request back today. I know when a public records request denial is like, oh, we want to stonewall this because there's something there. And I'm getting that vibe related to the contacts between the Norfolk DA's office and the Mass AGO's office between September 25th and October 24th of 2025 related to whether the Norfolk DA reached out to appoint a new special prosecutor in the Lindsey Gaetani and Aidan Kearney cases. But as I'm sitting here on my veranda with my eyes closed, I don't have a veranda. I have a desk. I'm a little towel. As I'm sitting here with my eyes closed, I can see the future materializing, okay? There's only certain roads that this can go down. There are only so many pathways left. There's a reckoning coming, folks. Whether it's a reckoning by way of the Sandra Birchmore cover-up, whether it's a reckoning by way of Michael Proctor's attempt to hide a substantial amount of evidence across a substantial number of criminal cases, whether it's related to Kate Peter's involvement in the handling of evidence in the still remaining Aidan Kearney cases. You can sense the anticipation. You can sense the apprehension and anxiety. And you can sense imminent closure. I'm not saying that is gonna be an easy process. I'm not saying it's gonna be a short process. But I'm saying there's something in the air. It's undeniable. There's little left to defend. There's not a single person, troll or otherwise anonymous account or whatever, who would stand up here today right now and with me and try to defend Kate Peter and Brian Tully. I gave you the chance. There's a time, if I had done this space a year ago, oh, people would have been jumping at the bit. No one will do it. No one. Why? Because we're at the end of the road. What Proctor did was indefensible, not in the Read O'Keefe case, although he should never have used those words about Karen. I'd critique him if he was a private citizen, although obviously I'm protective of women, right? But say what you will about that. I wouldn't use those words in private. That man used them in his capacity as a police officer. Right? Not to mention the other defendants' cases that were impacted by whatever Proctor and Sean Goode and whoever else was on that text chain and whatever else is on that phone is gonna lead to. You can sense it. You can sense the reckoning coming. The question is, back to Watergate in the '70s, there was a member of the House of Representatives during the impeachment hearings in '74. We had a very famous phrase. "What did the President know and when did he know?" Folks, the phrase of our era will be, "What did Michael Morrissey know and when did he know it?" This cannot start and end with justice for any single person involved in this. This is not about any one person at this point. This is about a system of justice in Massachusetts that I suppose was not about justice long before any of us realized it was teetering on the brink of collapse. Annie Dookhan was a warning that we all ignored to our peril. I should have seen it when they somehow got Lindsey that same lawyer that Annie Dookhan had. I should have seen it. It's not—I didn't realize until last week that lawyer George was a handler. Dookhan could create a huge—it could have created huge exposure for some people in the state police. It's incredible. If somebody painted the picture of the power structure that was at play here. Karen Read, when she said she was afraid of these people, I didn't—when she said it in the text or something and somebody leaked it. When I first started covering this case, I would not have got it. I don't know what it had been like. What do you mean? They're a state police unit. Like, yeah, they're paramilitary. Like, if you're a criminal, you should fear them, but they're not scary. Right now, after some of the stuff, and I'm talking about half the stuff I've seen as people pull, they horrifying. I think they're cornered, by the way. I don't think there's much they can do. They're getting a little desperate, burning a lot of their agents and their moles. And that's why I sense some kind of reckoning coming. You don't burn deep cover moles. I think Deanna was a mole for Kate for a while. You don't burn somebody like that unless it's almost over. Same thing with Kristy, the way Kristy's been burning everybody. I don't know who the hell she was working for, but whatever she's doing has got to be close to over because you don't burn everybody down unless it's almost over. So why is it almost over, folks? Why? What's coming? Some combination of all of this stuff. And if you want my fundamental prediction, let me give it to you like this. I don't like that it's coming to this, but it's a political question. It's a question of what the narrative is going to be. You don't just, as everyone now knows, you don't just prosecute people because they do things wrong. There's always a decision tree. So what do the feds want out of this? The people who were involved in the cover-up of Sandra Birchmore's murder, whoever was the father of Sandra's unborn child, you know, it's not that Matt Farwell. Well, and then they obviously want this MSP unit. Okay, Michael Proctor, that cell phone, didn't just get cloned. It was a setup. They let Proctor lie to the judge about all those cases and all the cell phone records. And as soon as his lawyer filed the document, they moved on him. He must be under federal investigation. How did Aidan Kearney get those text messages from Jen McCabe to KF and Allie McCabe? Those were removed from Jen McCabe's extraction. The feds cloned her phone too, just like Aidan told Lindsey in those text messages as part of Exhibit O from November 28, 2023. Why did the feds clone Jen McCabe's phone? To see what Jen would withhold in the Rule 14 process. She didn't get banged up on charges federally, so she must have not done anything that bad. Something, however, is going to happen to Proctor, in turn, legally on the federal level. You can sense it. You can sense it. They're going to indict him. But for what? But then it leaves Tully, which was what this whole stream is about. We have the email from Tully. Forget about whether it's normal procedure for Tully to instruct Proctor to look into all the defense witnesses. We now know that Proctor was not running that case. It was Tully. It was all Brian Tully. What was the meme that I put up today? I really like this one. It says, the nine most terrifying words in the English language are, "I'm Brian Tully and I'm here to help." Attributed to Ronald Reagan. My point is though, it was Brian Tully. Look at it. Kate was his little, I don't know, what do we want to call, how can we say this nicely? You know, I'm trying to rise above and encourage more reasonable, respectful discourse. So Kate was his little, this is so hard. All right, let me, let me say a prayer here. Come on, now you can do this. Okay. So, there are so many words I want to use. Kate was his little assistant. I know, I know. You were expecting something wonderful. Every single thing that I was going to say there was going to be cruel, so I'm sorry. Kate was his little assistant, his little PI there. And then, I'm going to turn it around, nightmare PI Moms, version 2, Kate Peter, Jen McCabe, let's go down the seaport. Kate Peter was his little PI until he was quarterbacking all this. I think it was Morrissey who was even cut out of the loop a little bit, although I'm not sure he wasn't more involved than I'm willing to say right now. And you can see why it happened. Because when Morrissey recused in October of 2023 from the Aidan Kearney cases, and what became the Aidan Kearney and Karen Read investigations that are still ongoing, he didn't really recuse. He just had Tully and Kate running it. I started to wonder if Jen McCabe was like a PI for a case she was a witness on. I'm really starting to wonder that.

Grant Smith Ellis

17,939 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Germany’s censorship may have done more to promote Citizen Vigilante than any advertising campaign or guerrilla marketing ever could have achieved. By refusing the film an official release, German authorities did not make the debate disappear. Quite the opposite. They made the film more interesting, more controversial, and far more visible to people who would otherwise never have watched it. Originally, Citizen Vigilante was mainly about Europe’s inability to protect and defend itself: a continent paralyzed by submission, obedience to incompetent governments, and politically biased police forces. But the film has now become something larger as well: a free-speech issue against German and European censorship. The hard and uncomfortable truth presented in the film does not fit the soft, woke worldview of those currently governing in Berlin. That is why they apparently preferred the movie to disappear quietly. The population was not supposed to talk even more about migrant violence. And they were certainly not supposed to talk even more about the incompetence of the left-leaning Merz government and the two-tier policing practiced by German police forces. Instead, Germany achieved the exact opposite. It scored an own goal. The film is set in Europe, but its central figure is an American fighter who confronts both criminal perpetrators and corrupt state and police representatives directly, with weapons, discipline, and decisive action. Some people have asked why the hero is not English, French, or German, given that the story takes place in Europe. The answer is simple: it would not have been believable. It would have felt false if a European protagonist had suddenly appeared out of nowhere as the hero. The Old World has long stopped producing credible heroes of this kind. It never had a Batman, and it certainly does not have a Citizen Vigilante. Europe has spent decades breeding total passivity and complete obedience into its civil societies. Not noble pacifism, but paralyzed passivism. Submission. Subordination. Hesitation. A true Untertan mentality. A culture of waiting, complaining, complying, and ultimately accepting whatever the state decides to impose, even when it is irrational, destructive, and leads to cultural chaos and national decline. The American Second Amendment reflects the idea that a free people must never be fully dependent on the state for their own security, and that an armed citizenry creates a final barrier against state tyranny. Europe does not have this. And the European mind does not even comprehend it. Europeans have become obedient subjects, even when obedience leads to their own downfall. They behave like lemmings walking toward the cliff, one after another. This is exactly the cultural background that makes Citizen Vigilante and its American main character so authentic and believable. The protagonist is not a weak European shaped by woke state dependency, speech control, censorship, bureaucratic obedience, and disarmed submission. He comes from the New World, from a culture in which personal responsibility, suspicion of state power, armed self-defense, and direct action are still part of the national character. In Europe, by contrast, not only have the people become far too passive and lethargic, but police forces have increasingly become political auxiliaries of left-wing politics. In countries like the UK, France, and Germany, the police often appear not as neutral protectors of law and order, but as instruments of political suppression, censorship, selective enforcement, two-tier policing, and helpers of an emerging police state in the spirit of Orwell’s 1984 and Big Brother. And that is why the strong, tough American protagonist works. He represents a type of man Europe has long lost and almost forgotten: a man with backbone. Resolute, decisive, trained, willing to act, and unwilling to surrender to a collapsing system and a corrupt state. He stands up. He pushes back. He resists. He says no. And beyond that, he acts. He fights. With full force and full determination. That is what makes him American, and that is exactly the type of character Citizen Vigilante needed. That is also why Germany wanted silence. The authorities did not want people to see that they can stand up, rise, push back, resist, say no, and fight for their own future. But instead of silence, Germany created attention. While Germany wanted control over the narrative, it created curiosity. Germany wanted to suppress the film, but in doing so, it may have awakened a sleeping giant. It may have turned Citizen Vigilante into a global free-speech story as a second storyline, beyond the issue of migrant crime. And if Elon Musk enters the discussion, this could become much bigger than Germany ever expected. Some in Berlin may soon say, “The spirits I called.” Perhaps it would have been wiser not to close their eyes to reality. Because now reality is catching up with Germany, not only on the screen, but already in the streets of Berlin and across the country. “Stadtbild,” as Merz once called it. Uwe Boll’s film hits the mark because Europe is weak. It has forgotten how to act, how to defend itself, how to resist, and, most importantly, how to fight. Just as Europe did not want to fight in foreign policy, for example alongside the Americans against the Islamist regime in Iran, Europeans also do not want to fight domestically to take back their own countries. They seem to have resigned inwardly. They seem to have given up. Partly because the demographic boomerang caused by catastrophic migration policy may have become too massive and perhaps already uncontrollable. And perhaps because it may already be too late to start fighting now. The demographic pressure created by mass migration is enormous, while Europeans have almost nothing to put against it because of their own extremely weak birth rates. Europe has therefore given up believing in reversal, let alone victory. It has forgotten that liberty is not preserved by bureaucrats, censors, politically biased police forces, and obedient citizens, but by people who still have the will, the courage, and the backbone to stand up and say no. Europe has given up on itself. Maybe things in Europe must become much worse before they can ever become better again. Or maybe it is already too late for even that. Citizen Vigilante or not.
0:54

Germany’s censorship may have done more to promote Citizen Vigilante than any advertising campaign or guerrilla marketing ever could have achieved. By refusing the film an official release, German authorities did not make the debate disappear. Quite the opposite. They made the film more interesting, more controversial, and far more visible to people who would otherwise never have watched it. Originally, Citizen Vigilante was mainly about Europe’s inability to protect and defend itself: a continent paralyzed by submission, obedience to incompetent governments, and politically biased police forces. But the film has now become something larger as well: a free-speech issue against German and European censorship. The hard and uncomfortable truth presented in the film does not fit the soft, woke worldview of those currently governing in Berlin. That is why they apparently preferred the movie to disappear quietly. The population was not supposed to talk even more about migrant violence. And they were certainly not supposed to talk even more about the incompetence of the left-leaning Merz government and the two-tier policing practiced by German police forces. Instead, Germany achieved the exact opposite. It scored an own goal. The film is set in Europe, but its central figure is an American fighter who confronts both criminal perpetrators and corrupt state and police representatives directly, with weapons, discipline, and decisive action. Some people have asked why the hero is not English, French, or German, given that the story takes place in Europe. The answer is simple: it would not have been believable. It would have felt false if a European protagonist had suddenly appeared out of nowhere as the hero. The Old World has long stopped producing credible heroes of this kind. It never had a Batman, and it certainly does not have a Citizen Vigilante. Europe has spent decades breeding total passivity and complete obedience into its civil societies. Not noble pacifism, but paralyzed passivism. Submission. Subordination. Hesitation. A true Untertan mentality. A culture of waiting, complaining, complying, and ultimately accepting whatever the state decides to impose, even when it is irrational, destructive, and leads to cultural chaos and national decline. The American Second Amendment reflects the idea that a free people must never be fully dependent on the state for their own security, and that an armed citizenry creates a final barrier against state tyranny. Europe does not have this. And the European mind does not even comprehend it. Europeans have become obedient subjects, even when obedience leads to their own downfall. They behave like lemmings walking toward the cliff, one after another. This is exactly the cultural background that makes Citizen Vigilante and its American main character so authentic and believable. The protagonist is not a weak European shaped by woke state dependency, speech control, censorship, bureaucratic obedience, and disarmed submission. He comes from the New World, from a culture in which personal responsibility, suspicion of state power, armed self-defense, and direct action are still part of the national character. In Europe, by contrast, not only have the people become far too passive and lethargic, but police forces have increasingly become political auxiliaries of left-wing politics. In countries like the UK, France, and Germany, the police often appear not as neutral protectors of law and order, but as instruments of political suppression, censorship, selective enforcement, two-tier policing, and helpers of an emerging police state in the spirit of Orwell’s 1984 and Big Brother. And that is why the strong, tough American protagonist works. He represents a type of man Europe has long lost and almost forgotten: a man with backbone. Resolute, decisive, trained, willing to act, and unwilling to surrender to a collapsing system and a corrupt state. He stands up. He pushes back. He resists. He says no. And beyond that, he acts. He fights. With full force and full determination. That is what makes him American, and that is exactly the type of character Citizen Vigilante needed. That is also why Germany wanted silence. The authorities did not want people to see that they can stand up, rise, push back, resist, say no, and fight for their own future. But instead of silence, Germany created attention. While Germany wanted control over the narrative, it created curiosity. Germany wanted to suppress the film, but in doing so, it may have awakened a sleeping giant. It may have turned Citizen Vigilante into a global free-speech story as a second storyline, beyond the issue of migrant crime. And if Elon Musk enters the discussion, this could become much bigger than Germany ever expected. Some in Berlin may soon say, “The spirits I called.” Perhaps it would have been wiser not to close their eyes to reality. Because now reality is catching up with Germany, not only on the screen, but already in the streets of Berlin and across the country. “Stadtbild,” as Merz once called it. Uwe Boll’s film hits the mark because Europe is weak. It has forgotten how to act, how to defend itself, how to resist, and, most importantly, how to fight. Just as Europe did not want to fight in foreign policy, for example alongside the Americans against the Islamist regime in Iran, Europeans also do not want to fight domestically to take back their own countries. They seem to have resigned inwardly. They seem to have given up. Partly because the demographic boomerang caused by catastrophic migration policy may have become too massive and perhaps already uncontrollable. And perhaps because it may already be too late to start fighting now. The demographic pressure created by mass migration is enormous, while Europeans have almost nothing to put against it because of their own extremely weak birth rates. Europe has therefore given up believing in reversal, let alone victory. It has forgotten that liberty is not preserved by bureaucrats, censors, politically biased police forces, and obedient citizens, but by people who still have the will, the courage, and the backbone to stand up and say no. Europe has given up on itself. Maybe things in Europe must become much worse before they can ever become better again. Or maybe it is already too late for even that. Citizen Vigilante or not.

Torsten Prochnow

32,709 просмотров • 1 месяц назад