Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

When dealing with skeptical people who argue about the validity of 3D printed firearms we are often asked a question. Well can you print bullets? Absolutely. Since 2023 we have raised the question how can you print ammunition and how can we make it better. We have 3 main... show more

Moderator Gage

20,825 subscribers

18,881 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji Haberler & Politika Eğitim

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Yorum

Some sort of Sean profil fotoğrafı

Some sort of Sean1 yıl önce

I see this working well, but I attribute the success to the cylinder of the revolver being the part that is providing all the support. Same with the close bolt of the rifle. The true test is a magazine-fed semiautomatic maintaining the ability to extract under heat.

Moderator Gage profil fotoğrafı

Moderator Gage1 yıl önce

We aren't there yet unfortunately but we're trying :)

🐻‍❄️Lord Bowelrod PhD profil fotoğrafı

🐻‍❄️Lord Bowelrod PhD1 yıl önce

5gr of titegroup and 118 projectiles should yield low power 38spcl results. 8 or 900 fps iirc. While primers are still an issue sorta, the pressure levels are well thought out for squirted cases.

Moderator Gage profil fotoğrafı

Moderator Gage1 yıl önce

We're working hard on printed primers :)

reluctantminarchist profil fotoğrafı

reluctantminarchist1 yıl önce

My favorite is the 3D printing of 37mm and 40mm high-low "spicy fireworks"

Moderator Gage profil fotoğrafı

Moderator Gage1 yıl önce

Fireworks are fun

George Conway profil fotoğrafı

George Conway1 yıl önce

Freaking awesome

Moderator Gage profil fotoğrafı

Moderator Gage1 yıl önce

Isn't it beautiful

Montanan Rock Hound profil fotoğrafı

Montanan Rock Hound1 yıl önce

This is sick.

Moderator Gage profil fotoğrafı

Moderator Gage1 yıl önce

Thank you

Benzer Videolar

“The intent and the law are two different things.” We can fact-check you all day on your out-of-context statements and misquotes, but since you seem to enjoy appearing ignorant, I’ll let you continue down that path while we continue to push the truth.

“The intent and the law are two different things.” We can fact-check you all day on your out-of-context statements and misquotes, but since you seem to enjoy appearing ignorant, I’ll let you continue down that path while we continue to push the truth.

Topher

196,523 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Host: The officer appeared to have fired 3 shots. The first one through the front windshield, the second and third through the side window. What is the justification for the second and third, given that the officer was out of harm's way? Noem: We don't get to change it because we can see it with our eyes, and we can build on the evidence that we have on the ground. What they're trying to do to continue to defraud people in their city and in their state, continue to take advantage of individuals and to allow criminals— Host: I don't know what you're talking about.

Host: The officer appeared to have fired 3 shots. The first one through the front windshield, the second and third through the side window. What is the justification for the second and third, given that the officer was out of harm's way? Noem: We don't get to change it because we can see it with our eyes, and we can build on the evidence that we have on the ground. What they're trying to do to continue to defraud people in their city and in their state, continue to take advantage of individuals and to allow criminals— Host: I don't know what you're talking about.

FactPost

730,792 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Trump on his DC takeover: "The big question is, how long do we stay? Because if we stay, we want to make sure it doesn't come back. So we have to take care of these criminals ... we can take everybody out and you have a great capital."

Trump on his DC takeover: "The big question is, how long do we stay? Because if we stay, we want to make sure it doesn't come back. So we have to take care of these criminals ... we can take everybody out and you have a great capital."

Aaron Rupar

28,663 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Tedros: "[The WHO] is working... to understand how misinformation and disinformation spreads... and what we can do to counter this problem." "But we must also make sure that when when we seek the trust of others, we are ourselves trustworthy." On a scale of 0-100, how "trustworthy" do you find Tedros and the WHO? 🤔

Tedros: "[The WHO] is working... to understand how misinformation and disinformation spreads... and what we can do to counter this problem." "But we must also make sure that when when we seek the trust of others, we are ourselves trustworthy." On a scale of 0-100, how "trustworthy" do you find Tedros and the WHO? 🤔

Wide Awake Media

86,445 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Twelve years ago we asked the question: how can we put public data "on wheels"? Datawheel was born from vision that data alone doesn't get far. It needs vehicles to reach hearts and minds. Vehicles that make data easy to find, explore, and understand. Today, Datawheel turns twelve. In these twelve years, we have built dozens of solutions that are helping define the state of the art in public data distribution. Today we celebrate this journey. A journey with a great team and amazing clients. The journey to make public data all it can be. are some of the tools defining all that public data can be. Thank you!!!

Twelve years ago we asked the question: how can we put public data "on wheels"? Datawheel was born from vision that data alone doesn't get far. It needs vehicles to reach hearts and minds. Vehicles that make data easy to find, explore, and understand. Today, Datawheel turns twelve. In these twelve years, we have built dozens of solutions that are helping define the state of the art in public data distribution. Today we celebrate this journey. A journey with a great team and amazing clients. The journey to make public data all it can be. are some of the tools defining all that public data can be. Thank you!!!

César A. Hidalgo

12,931 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

What Israelis really have to say to the people of Iran? "We hope and pray the day will come when Iranians can come visit in Jerusalem and we can go visit in Tehran. People of Iran, the people of Israel loves you. We Israelis stand with you. Free Iran!"

What Israelis really have to say to the people of Iran? "We hope and pray the day will come when Iranians can come visit in Jerusalem and we can go visit in Tehran. People of Iran, the people of Israel loves you. We Israelis stand with you. Free Iran!"

Vivid.🇮🇱

17,964 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

JUST IN: Kamala Harris turns into bumbling mess after she is asked about how Americans will fit into her plans, mentions how she is from the middle class. Question: What do you say to Americans who don't feel like they fit into your policies? Answer: Well... if you are hardworking, if you have the dreams and the ambitions and the aspirations of what I believe you do, you're in my plan. You know, I, I have to tell you I really love, and I'm so energized by what I know to be the spirit and character of the American people. We have ambition, we have aspirations, we have dreams. We can see what's possible... And I come from the middle class.

JUST IN: Kamala Harris turns into bumbling mess after she is asked about how Americans will fit into her plans, mentions how she is from the middle class. Question: What do you say to Americans who don't feel like they fit into your policies? Answer: Well... if you are hardworking, if you have the dreams and the ambitions and the aspirations of what I believe you do, you're in my plan. You know, I, I have to tell you I really love, and I'm so energized by what I know to be the spirit and character of the American people. We have ambition, we have aspirations, we have dreams. We can see what's possible... And I come from the middle class.

Collin Rugg

1,515,053 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

ABC’s George Stephanopoulos attempted to trip up Secretary of State Marco Rubio by asking the same question about Venezuela three different times. “What is the legal authority for the United States to be running Venezuela?” And three times, Rubio shut him down. RUBIO: “I explained to you what our goals are and how we’re going to use the leverage to make it happen.” “As far as our legal authority on the quarantine, simple. We have court orders. These are sanctioned boats, and we get orders from courts to go after and seize these sanctions. Is a court not a legal authority?” STEPHANOPOULOS: “Is the United States running Venezuela right now?” RUBIO: “Well, I’ve explained once again, I’ll do it one more time.” “What we are running is the direction this is going to move moving forward, and that is we have leverage.” “This leverage we are using and we intend to use. We started using already. You can see where they are running out of storage capacity. In a few weeks, they’re going to have to start pumping oil, unless they make changes.” “That leverage that we have with the armada of boats that are currently positioned, allow us to seize any sanctioned boats coming into or out of Venezuela loaded with oil or on its way in to pick up oil.” “We can pick and choose which ones we go after. We have court orders for each one.” “That will continue to be in place until the people who have control over the levers of power in that country make changes that are not just in the interest of the people of Venezuela but are in the interest of the United States and the things that we care about.” “The legal authority is the court orders that we have.”

ABC’s George Stephanopoulos attempted to trip up Secretary of State Marco Rubio by asking the same question about Venezuela three different times. “What is the legal authority for the United States to be running Venezuela?” And three times, Rubio shut him down. RUBIO: “I explained to you what our goals are and how we’re going to use the leverage to make it happen.” “As far as our legal authority on the quarantine, simple. We have court orders. These are sanctioned boats, and we get orders from courts to go after and seize these sanctions. Is a court not a legal authority?” STEPHANOPOULOS: “Is the United States running Venezuela right now?” RUBIO: “Well, I’ve explained once again, I’ll do it one more time.” “What we are running is the direction this is going to move moving forward, and that is we have leverage.” “This leverage we are using and we intend to use. We started using already. You can see where they are running out of storage capacity. In a few weeks, they’re going to have to start pumping oil, unless they make changes.” “That leverage that we have with the armada of boats that are currently positioned, allow us to seize any sanctioned boats coming into or out of Venezuela loaded with oil or on its way in to pick up oil.” “We can pick and choose which ones we go after. We have court orders for each one.” “That will continue to be in place until the people who have control over the levers of power in that country make changes that are not just in the interest of the people of Venezuela but are in the interest of the United States and the things that we care about.” “The legal authority is the court orders that we have.”

Overton

213,086 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Shuler: If you think about every industrial revolution we’ve been through, working people have helped us make that transition. It’s really because we’ve helped tame the technology and figured out how to use it in the most effective way. So I think your question about augmentation versus replacement is the big question we have. If we can all agree that this is about making our jobs better, safer, easier, and more productive, then we’re all in. But if you’re looking to de-skill, dehumanize, and replace workers, to put people out on the street with no path forward, then absolutely you’re going to have a revolution. So I think that’s something we all need to be very real about and think seriously about. If we’re going to have productivity gains, working people—the ones who make these industries happen—need to share in that. There hasn’t been a lot of discussion about that here. Of course, in terms of how we create policies, how we create tax infrastructure, whether or not we are redistributing—yes, that word is a dirty word around here—we need to talk about it and confront how we’re going to make sure working people share in the gains of these technologies. And if you look at the numbers of jobs, let’s talk about job quality. Yes, maybe there are a lot of jobs created, but what kind of jobs are we talking about? Are they jobs that can sustain a family? Is it a job where people can actually work one job? One job should be enough.

Shuler: If you think about every industrial revolution we’ve been through, working people have helped us make that transition. It’s really because we’ve helped tame the technology and figured out how to use it in the most effective way. So I think your question about augmentation versus replacement is the big question we have. If we can all agree that this is about making our jobs better, safer, easier, and more productive, then we’re all in. But if you’re looking to de-skill, dehumanize, and replace workers, to put people out on the street with no path forward, then absolutely you’re going to have a revolution. So I think that’s something we all need to be very real about and think seriously about. If we’re going to have productivity gains, working people—the ones who make these industries happen—need to share in that. There hasn’t been a lot of discussion about that here. Of course, in terms of how we create policies, how we create tax infrastructure, whether or not we are redistributing—yes, that word is a dirty word around here—we need to talk about it and confront how we’re going to make sure working people share in the gains of these technologies. And if you look at the numbers of jobs, let’s talk about job quality. Yes, maybe there are a lot of jobs created, but what kind of jobs are we talking about? Are they jobs that can sustain a family? Is it a job where people can actually work one job? One job should be enough.

Acyn

41,942 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🔊… 🚨🚨🚨 "The American people are the only people who are told, go work super hard, and we are going to take half of your money. And when we take half of your money, we are going to send it overseas." "Have you ever noticed that none of the citizens on the planet work so we can have a better here in America? Why are we financing the well being of every other country on this planet?"

🔊… 🚨🚨🚨 "The American people are the only people who are told, go work super hard, and we are going to take half of your money. And when we take half of your money, we are going to send it overseas." "Have you ever noticed that none of the citizens on the planet work so we can have a better here in America? Why are we financing the well being of every other country on this planet?"

Wall Street Mav

2,834,581 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Ben Horowitz on the necessity of American Dynamism at the dawn of the AI revolution: "There's really been no country in the world that comes close to America at giving people a shot." "When people have a chance to contribute, then they can have an impact. Then they can advance the state of things for everybody." "We won the industrial revolution, and we did that because we had superior technology." "And here we are on the dawn of a new technological revolution, the AI revolution." "Are we going to be able to give people a shot, and continue to advance humanity?" "I think that's an open question right now." benahorowitz.eth

Ben Horowitz on the necessity of American Dynamism at the dawn of the AI revolution: "There's really been no country in the world that comes close to America at giving people a shot." "When people have a chance to contribute, then they can have an impact. Then they can advance the state of things for everybody." "We won the industrial revolution, and we did that because we had superior technology." "And here we are on the dawn of a new technological revolution, the AI revolution." "Are we going to be able to give people a shot, and continue to advance humanity?" "I think that's an open question right now." benahorowitz.eth

David Ulevitch 🇺🇸

25,448 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

#BREAKING: Dana Bash: “And you’re 100% sure that what happened with the liner was vandalism, you can prove it?” Sec Burgum: “Oh you absolutely can, and as we drain it, we’ve got all the photographs. We can see we can see I mean there’s there’s no possible way…” Dana: “…the photographs of a person or people cutting a 300 or 350 foot gash in the bottom of the reflecting pool?” Sec Burgum: “Dana, I’m not sure why you and others in the media think that you want to keep trying to question…”🤦‍♀️

#BREAKING: Dana Bash: “And you’re 100% sure that what happened with the liner was vandalism, you can prove it?” Sec Burgum: “Oh you absolutely can, and as we drain it, we’ve got all the photographs. We can see we can see I mean there’s there’s no possible way…” Dana: “…the photographs of a person or people cutting a 300 or 350 foot gash in the bottom of the reflecting pool?” Sec Burgum: “Dana, I’m not sure why you and others in the media think that you want to keep trying to question…”🤦‍♀️

Emoluments Clause

404,392 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

Ryan Peterman

20,069 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

“When you think of Lou Holtz, find the person closest to you and ask them, "What can I do for you?" If we can all do that, we will continue his legacy by making this a little warmer, better place than we found it.” - Skip Holtz

“When you think of Lou Holtz, find the person closest to you and ask them, "What can I do for you?" If we can all do that, we will continue his legacy by making this a little warmer, better place than we found it.” - Skip Holtz

University of Notre Dame

26,143 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

We've reset the relationship between the government and teachers, so we can be partners in the push for better. Bridget Phillipson spoke with Garret Fay, CEO of Insignis Academy Trust, about how schools are working with the government to deliver change, so every child can achieve and thrive. We want to hear from you, too. Have your say on the SEND consultation:

We've reset the relationship between the government and teachers, so we can be partners in the push for better. Bridget Phillipson spoke with Garret Fay, CEO of Insignis Academy Trust, about how schools are working with the government to deliver change, so every child can achieve and thrive. We want to hear from you, too. Have your say on the SEND consultation:

Department for Education

34,993 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Coming very soon to a 3D Printer near you. The sheer simplicity of the ammo and the lack of professional tools is a part of the demonstration so don't get too hurt by this. This is a project we have been working on for a while known as the Deep ammo series. It is a 3D printed ammunition system that uses a printed hull, powder, a primer (whether printed or normal), and a projectile. As of now we have these cycling in revolvers, and both actions but getting something like this firing semi-automatic is difficult. Not impossible though, we are hard at work and I just know you'll be seeing more of these soon.

Coming very soon to a 3D Printer near you. The sheer simplicity of the ammo and the lack of professional tools is a part of the demonstration so don't get too hurt by this. This is a project we have been working on for a while known as the Deep ammo series. It is a 3D printed ammunition system that uses a printed hull, powder, a primer (whether printed or normal), and a projectile. As of now we have these cycling in revolvers, and both actions but getting something like this firing semi-automatic is difficult. Not impossible though, we are hard at work and I just know you'll be seeing more of these soon.

Moderator Gage

35,418 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

"That's a ridiculous theory — for anyone who might take it seriously. But at the end of the day, it's something we always have to continue to work on: How do we make our officiating better?" - Roger Goodell when asked about public perception that referees are favoring the Chiefs

"That's a ridiculous theory — for anyone who might take it seriously. But at the end of the day, it's something we always have to continue to work on: How do we make our officiating better?" - Roger Goodell when asked about public perception that referees are favoring the Chiefs

NFL on CBS 🏈

465,353 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce