Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

When explaining the fundamental flaw with the current agricultural system, Bruce Friedrich said: "For about 12,000 years we have been raising animals for meat in roughly the same way: we farm them." This is an incredibly inefficient process, where up to 99% of what we feed animals goes toward...

johncumbers's profile picture

John Cumbers

17,576 subscribers

18,693 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

.Chris Packham: "6 billion animals are slaughtered to feed our pet dogs across the world every year, and if we transitioned them to a plant based diet we could feed 449 million more people. That's the cost of a meat based diet to dogs on planet Earth" #GMB
0:23

.Chris Packham: "6 billion animals are slaughtered to feed our pet dogs across the world every year, and if we transitioned them to a plant based diet we could feed 449 million more people. That's the cost of a meat based diet to dogs on planet Earth" #GMB

Saul Staniforth

20,241 views • 7 months ago

Nature is in crisis. And the cause of the decline in nature is not the concreting over the country, it's not the climate crisis, it's our food choice. Farming takes about 75% of our farmland - we grow plants, to feed animals, to feed people. If we remove farmed animals from that equation, we can give a massive 50% of the land back to nature. We can reverse this crisis by rethinking what we eat - Less animals, more plants...:)
1:08

Nature is in crisis. And the cause of the decline in nature is not the concreting over the country, it's not the climate crisis, it's our food choice. Farming takes about 75% of our farmland - we grow plants, to feed animals, to feed people. If we remove farmed animals from that equation, we can give a massive 50% of the land back to nature. We can reverse this crisis by rethinking what we eat - Less animals, more plants...:)

Dale Vince

30,010 views • 2 years ago

Great to speak at the #RestoreNatureNow Rally in London yesterday. I spoke about the cow in the room... The blind spot of many who care about climate, nature, and the environment: our diet. Nature is in decline not just because us concreting the country, the climate crisis, or the fossil fuel industry, but largely due to what we choose to eat. Farmland takes up about 75% of our country. We grow plants, to feed animals, to feed people - an inefficient system. For example, we put 10 times more protein into a cow than we get back out. If we stop eating animals, we can give 50% of the land back to nature. That’s how we resolve this crisis. Restore Nature Now Extinction Rebellion UK 🌍 Plant Based News Animal Rising
3:03

Great to speak at the #RestoreNatureNow Rally in London yesterday. I spoke about the cow in the room... The blind spot of many who care about climate, nature, and the environment: our diet. Nature is in decline not just because us concreting the country, the climate crisis, or the fossil fuel industry, but largely due to what we choose to eat. Farmland takes up about 75% of our country. We grow plants, to feed animals, to feed people - an inefficient system. For example, we put 10 times more protein into a cow than we get back out. If we stop eating animals, we can give 50% of the land back to nature. That’s how we resolve this crisis. Restore Nature Now Extinction Rebellion UK 🌍 Plant Based News Animal Rising

Dale Vince

185,415 views • 2 years ago

Here’s How 1 McDonald’s Hamburger Contains 1300 Strands Of Different DNA. This Is The Result Of Going From Small Farms To Mega Corporations “We're pooling the bacteria from a thousand different animals” “Thousands of animals” contribute “to a single hamburger.” “This is a combo bin of meat. The meat in these boxes comes from many different animals and many different places. Some is even from overseas. All of it is ground together to make the juicy hamburger Americans love. Hamburger used to be the scraps left over from butchering just one cow.” But a significant change has occurred. Now parts of many cows are blended together by the ton. ‌ If we take the meat from one animal, grind it up and make ground beef from just one animal, we're including only the bacteria from one animal. But if we take the meat from a thousand different animals and grind that together, we're pooling the bacteria from a thousand different animals as well. So explain this to me, how many different cows would be in one burger? Well, I suspect that there are hundreds or even thousands of animals that have contributed to a single hamburger.”
1:02

Here’s How 1 McDonald’s Hamburger Contains 1300 Strands Of Different DNA. This Is The Result Of Going From Small Farms To Mega Corporations “We're pooling the bacteria from a thousand different animals” “Thousands of animals” contribute “to a single hamburger.” “This is a combo bin of meat. The meat in these boxes comes from many different animals and many different places. Some is even from overseas. All of it is ground together to make the juicy hamburger Americans love. Hamburger used to be the scraps left over from butchering just one cow.” But a significant change has occurred. Now parts of many cows are blended together by the ton. ‌ If we take the meat from one animal, grind it up and make ground beef from just one animal, we're including only the bacteria from one animal. But if we take the meat from a thousand different animals and grind that together, we're pooling the bacteria from a thousand different animals as well. So explain this to me, how many different cows would be in one burger? Well, I suspect that there are hundreds or even thousands of animals that have contributed to a single hamburger.”

Wall Street Apes

3,114,142 views • 2 years ago

Esther McVey calls for clearer labelling of halal and kosher meats in the UK She argued that consumers concerned about animal welfare particularly where pre‑stunning isn’t used - (88% of halal meat in the UK is pre-stunned) Transcript: “I beg to move, That leave be given to bring in a Bill to introduce compulsory labelling of halal and kosher meat and products containing halal and kosher meat; and for connected purposes. This is a Bill about animal welfare, transparency in meat production and consumer choice. It does not seek to ban halal or kosher meat. It seeks to ensure that it is clearly labelled. It is important that consumers have such information so that they can make an informed choice about what they are buying. Currently consumers do not have that information, and many are purchasing and consuming halal and kosher meat without their knowledge and agreement. The unique process of halal and kosher meat requires the animal to have its throat slit. In the case of halal meat, the animal is often stunned before it is killed — although it might not be — and for the shechita killing for kosher meat, there is no pre‑stunning. This lack of stunning causes the animal to experience severe pain. An individual concerned about animal welfare would want to know if the animal has been stunned prior to slaughter. Likewise, there are many religious groups who want to know what they are consuming too and whether the meat has been blessed by another religion. In all those cases clear labelling is essential to make an informed choice. Currently, the legislation that regulates animal slaughter is set out in assimilated EU regulation 1099/2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing, as well as in the Welfare of Animals at the Time of Killing (England) Regulations 2015. Under these laws, animals must be stunned before they are killed, but exemptions exist for killing without stunning in accordance with specific religious rites. Added to that, there are currently no requirements for such meat to be labelled. What was once an exemption to the accepted stunning process of animals has become a growing part of the UK’s meat market. The Government’s own figures show that of the 1.035 billion animals processed in English and Welsh slaughterhouses in 2024, an estimated 214.6 million were slaughtered to produce halal meat. The analysis shows that the proportion of meat supplied by non‑stun slaughter is about four times greater than the proportion of Muslims and Jews in the UK. Although Government guidance is clear that meat that results from non‑stun slaughter “must be intended for consumption by Jews or Muslims”, production is clearly going way beyond that, so much so that the UK now exports halal meat. Between 2018 and 2019, there was an almost 700 % increase in the volume of sheep meat exported to the United Arab Emirates, all of which is required to be halal. Clearly, without compulsory labelling of non‑stunned meat, slaughterhouses have gone down the route of producing more of it. In effect, a two‑tier system has been created, whereby some slaughterhouses comply with stunning laws and others do not, citing the religious exemption, though without ever intending to focus their sale on that market. Unfortunately, a driver of the market for non‑stunned meat is the fact that a step of the process is removed, meaning that production of non‑stunned meat is cheaper. Supermarkets and food outlets can purchase that cheaper meat without ever declaring it to the customer, which is not what was intended by the legislation. We have seen many examples of this over the last 15 years; Britain’s biggest retailers — such as Sainsbury’s, Tesco, Marks & Spencer and Asda — have sold halal or kosher meat without informing the consumer, as have Domino’s, Pizza Hut and KFC. Non‑stunned produce is being used by 17 local councils in schools, the majority of which are not Islamic faith schools, without parents or children having the first idea about it. It is also being served in hospitals and local councils. In December, Labour put forward its much‑vaunted animal welfare strategy, a document lauded for its aim of “preventing animals suffering unnecessarily”, which included the banning of boiling live lobsters, banning the use of carbon dioxide to stun pigs, and steps to ensure the more humane slaughter of farmed fish. I was surprised and alarmed to see no mention of the more humane slaughter of animals and the labelling of halal and kosher meat. There was a clear opportunity to call for the labelling of halal and kosher meat, but it was missed. Nowhere in Labour’s 12,500‑word animal welfare strategy was it mentioned. We often hear in the House that the UK holds the status of a world leader in animal welfare, but such a glaring gap shows that this country can no longer make such a claim. Food and You 2, which is a biannual official statistic survey commissioned by the Food Standards Agency, found that the most common spontaneously expressed food concern in 2024 was “food production method”. In August 2022, almost 99 % of respondents to the Government’s call for evidence on labelling for animal welfare said that method‑of‑slaughter labelling should be introduced. In research from the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, 92 % of halal consumers state that clear halal certification is important, so is it not time we updated our regulations and demanded that our meat was clearly and fully labelled, so that we know what we are buying and eating? Surely that is what consumer choice is all about, and I would wager that the overwhelming majority of animal lovers in the UK expect the House of Commons to support this Bill today. This Bill will give all consumers assurance that they know how their meat was produced. I urge all Members of the House to support this measure.”
6:39

Esther McVey calls for clearer labelling of halal and kosher meats in the UK She argued that consumers concerned about animal welfare particularly where pre‑stunning isn’t used - (88% of halal meat in the UK is pre-stunned) Transcript: “I beg to move, That leave be given to bring in a Bill to introduce compulsory labelling of halal and kosher meat and products containing halal and kosher meat; and for connected purposes. This is a Bill about animal welfare, transparency in meat production and consumer choice. It does not seek to ban halal or kosher meat. It seeks to ensure that it is clearly labelled. It is important that consumers have such information so that they can make an informed choice about what they are buying. Currently consumers do not have that information, and many are purchasing and consuming halal and kosher meat without their knowledge and agreement. The unique process of halal and kosher meat requires the animal to have its throat slit. In the case of halal meat, the animal is often stunned before it is killed — although it might not be — and for the shechita killing for kosher meat, there is no pre‑stunning. This lack of stunning causes the animal to experience severe pain. An individual concerned about animal welfare would want to know if the animal has been stunned prior to slaughter. Likewise, there are many religious groups who want to know what they are consuming too and whether the meat has been blessed by another religion. In all those cases clear labelling is essential to make an informed choice. Currently, the legislation that regulates animal slaughter is set out in assimilated EU regulation 1099/2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing, as well as in the Welfare of Animals at the Time of Killing (England) Regulations 2015. Under these laws, animals must be stunned before they are killed, but exemptions exist for killing without stunning in accordance with specific religious rites. Added to that, there are currently no requirements for such meat to be labelled. What was once an exemption to the accepted stunning process of animals has become a growing part of the UK’s meat market. The Government’s own figures show that of the 1.035 billion animals processed in English and Welsh slaughterhouses in 2024, an estimated 214.6 million were slaughtered to produce halal meat. The analysis shows that the proportion of meat supplied by non‑stun slaughter is about four times greater than the proportion of Muslims and Jews in the UK. Although Government guidance is clear that meat that results from non‑stun slaughter “must be intended for consumption by Jews or Muslims”, production is clearly going way beyond that, so much so that the UK now exports halal meat. Between 2018 and 2019, there was an almost 700 % increase in the volume of sheep meat exported to the United Arab Emirates, all of which is required to be halal. Clearly, without compulsory labelling of non‑stunned meat, slaughterhouses have gone down the route of producing more of it. In effect, a two‑tier system has been created, whereby some slaughterhouses comply with stunning laws and others do not, citing the religious exemption, though without ever intending to focus their sale on that market. Unfortunately, a driver of the market for non‑stunned meat is the fact that a step of the process is removed, meaning that production of non‑stunned meat is cheaper. Supermarkets and food outlets can purchase that cheaper meat without ever declaring it to the customer, which is not what was intended by the legislation. We have seen many examples of this over the last 15 years; Britain’s biggest retailers — such as Sainsbury’s, Tesco, Marks & Spencer and Asda — have sold halal or kosher meat without informing the consumer, as have Domino’s, Pizza Hut and KFC. Non‑stunned produce is being used by 17 local councils in schools, the majority of which are not Islamic faith schools, without parents or children having the first idea about it. It is also being served in hospitals and local councils. In December, Labour put forward its much‑vaunted animal welfare strategy, a document lauded for its aim of “preventing animals suffering unnecessarily”, which included the banning of boiling live lobsters, banning the use of carbon dioxide to stun pigs, and steps to ensure the more humane slaughter of farmed fish. I was surprised and alarmed to see no mention of the more humane slaughter of animals and the labelling of halal and kosher meat. There was a clear opportunity to call for the labelling of halal and kosher meat, but it was missed. Nowhere in Labour’s 12,500‑word animal welfare strategy was it mentioned. We often hear in the House that the UK holds the status of a world leader in animal welfare, but such a glaring gap shows that this country can no longer make such a claim. Food and You 2, which is a biannual official statistic survey commissioned by the Food Standards Agency, found that the most common spontaneously expressed food concern in 2024 was “food production method”. In August 2022, almost 99 % of respondents to the Government’s call for evidence on labelling for animal welfare said that method‑of‑slaughter labelling should be introduced. In research from the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, 92 % of halal consumers state that clear halal certification is important, so is it not time we updated our regulations and demanded that our meat was clearly and fully labelled, so that we know what we are buying and eating? Surely that is what consumer choice is all about, and I would wager that the overwhelming majority of animal lovers in the UK expect the House of Commons to support this Bill today. This Bill will give all consumers assurance that they know how their meat was produced. I urge all Members of the House to support this measure.”

Farrukh

10,729 views • 5 months ago

Good morning, this peaceful video of the sanctuary, does not reflect what we have in our hearts, we are worried, the lease of the farm is about to expire, the owner has increased our rent, we have looked for other farms, but the costs of rebuilding the dog houses. Bibers the horse is old, and moving them all with such short time is impossible for us. we think that at least for another year we have to stay there, even paying more, but at least we will have time to look for a better place, without trauma or stress for our animals. the only trauma now is that the owner has asked us for a year's rent in advance, as a negotiation to not raise the price too much, for this we ask you for a hand please, 🙏 the cost of a year's rent for the farm is: $5400. can you help us please, we need to protect our animals. Bank account: House of Cats Ernesto Iban : IT73E0326822300052461720340 SWIFT: SELBIT2BXXX
2:10

Good morning, this peaceful video of the sanctuary, does not reflect what we have in our hearts, we are worried, the lease of the farm is about to expire, the owner has increased our rent, we have looked for other farms, but the costs of rebuilding the dog houses. Bibers the horse is old, and moving them all with such short time is impossible for us. we think that at least for another year we have to stay there, even paying more, but at least we will have time to look for a better place, without trauma or stress for our animals. the only trauma now is that the owner has asked us for a year's rent in advance, as a negotiation to not raise the price too much, for this we ask you for a hand please, 🙏 the cost of a year's rent for the farm is: $5400. can you help us please, we need to protect our animals. Bank account: House of Cats Ernesto Iban : IT73E0326822300052461720340 SWIFT: SELBIT2BXXX

Ernesto’s Sanctuary for Syrian Cats

64,561 views • 1 year ago

Speaking at the WEF, Siemens chairman Jim Hagemann Snabe on the "need" to replace meat-based diets with insect and plant-based diets, in order to "address" the "climate crisis": "Food systems account for around 21% of CO2 emissions... If we reinvent that, we would have zero carbon." "If a billion people stop eating meat, it has a big impact... It will also inspire innovation of food systems." "I predict that we will have proteins not coming from meat in the future. They will probably taste even better, so why are we trying to mimic meat if we can have a better taste? They will be zero carbon, and much healthier than the kind of food that we eat today." On a scale of 0-10, how likely are you to stop eating meat in order to "address" the "climate crisis"?
2:05

Speaking at the WEF, Siemens chairman Jim Hagemann Snabe on the "need" to replace meat-based diets with insect and plant-based diets, in order to "address" the "climate crisis": "Food systems account for around 21% of CO2 emissions... If we reinvent that, we would have zero carbon." "If a billion people stop eating meat, it has a big impact... It will also inspire innovation of food systems." "I predict that we will have proteins not coming from meat in the future. They will probably taste even better, so why are we trying to mimic meat if we can have a better taste? They will be zero carbon, and much healthier than the kind of food that we eat today." On a scale of 0-10, how likely are you to stop eating meat in order to "address" the "climate crisis"?

Wide Awake Media

118,674 views • 1 year ago

Bill Gates, at COP 28: "The issue of food systems and how with climate change, a lot of farmers aren't able to grow their crops, which is a tragedy for them. We'll talk about using innovation to absolutely solve that problem." Globalist doublespeak translation: Due to our deliberate war on agriculture, a lot of farmers aren't able to grow their crops, which is a blessing for us because it allows us to replace traditional agriculture with insect farms and fake meat laboratories, in order to assume absolute control of the global food supply, under the guise of "saving the planet".
0:30

Bill Gates, at COP 28: "The issue of food systems and how with climate change, a lot of farmers aren't able to grow their crops, which is a tragedy for them. We'll talk about using innovation to absolutely solve that problem." Globalist doublespeak translation: Due to our deliberate war on agriculture, a lot of farmers aren't able to grow their crops, which is a blessing for us because it allows us to replace traditional agriculture with insect farms and fake meat laboratories, in order to assume absolute control of the global food supply, under the guise of "saving the planet".

Wide Awake Media

1,846,563 views • 2 years ago

We import US$ 23 million chicken neck and back is what we import annually to Jamaica, close to US$13 million in beef offals, beef trimmings US$ 16 million, rice US$84 million.... You may ask why there are so many parts of an animal and rice. Most Jamaicans cannot afford chicken, beef, or fish to feed their families, so they must resort to cuts and trimmings. In other words “Di Pot a boil but di food nuh nuff.” Disclaimer: I am not in the PNP's shadow cabinet, so what I am about to say may not contend. But this is something I've been speaking and writing about for years. I would like you to think for yourself and re-examine with data some long-held beliefs that others have tried to impose on you, saying they are supposed to be in your self-interest. Today, I want to highlight and explain just one and why it is a significant reason why our people remain unhealthy with obesity, high blood pressure, and other primary health ailments. They cannot afford to buy a balanced food basket because the cost of chicken is out of their reach. For decades, Jamaica has had 250% duty protection on chicken meat. Globally, the average import duty rate on chicken in other countries is 24%, so why must it be 250% in Jamaica? (it’s actually 260%) Is this really in our people's national interest, or are we serving the interest of a very few individuals, in particular 2 companies? Before you have a knee-jerk reaction to 'yes, it helps local production," let us look at the data rather than an emotion. The International cost breakdown of a chicken is feed (largely corn) at 61%, baby chicks at 18%, housing at 7%, others at 10%, and labor at only 4%. We do not make feed in Jamaica. We don't produce corn. We don't produce wheat or soybean; the inputs that go into feed. What we refer to as feed mills in Jamaica are really big silos and a mixer that blends these imported inputs into the final product, much the same as concrete is composed of sand, stone, cement, and water. But at least in concrete, all the inputs are produced in Jamaica, so the "local " feed is a totally imported product. So, in effect, the local Jamaican direct cost input of chicken is less than 10%. Therefore, I challenge the logic of providing excessive duty protection to any product with a local input of less than 20%, much less chicken, whose input is less than 10%. All the inputs in animal feed are traded as commodities on the world market, like oil; the price fluctuates in keeping with the law of supply and demand. The price of corn has fallen from $801 (US/Bu) April 2022 ,to less than $392.50today ( Check it yourself on on straight mathematical terms with 50% reduction in the cost of feed which represents 61% of the cost input of chicken our chicken prices should have gone down by about 30%, but instead it went up. Who benefits? Certainly not the Jamaican public whose citizens find it hard to afford a whole chicken dinner, certainly not the workers at the factory whose pay remains much the same, and certainly not the Jamaican economy as there has been little or no growth in our agricultural sector generally for years. Did you know that if you apply for a permit to import a container of chicken in any form, the ministry of agriculture first refers the matter to the two chicken monopoly producers to find out if they have any objections? Tell them to challenge me on this! What do you think is their response? With that system in place, there is effectively no real competition in the marketplace. In fact there is no marketplace. You pay what the two local monopolies decide you should pay. Since it’s so obvious, you will wonder why this backward policy has continued. Well, the false theory is that we are saving the livelihood of the 30,000 small farmers. But is this really true?
8:31

We import US$ 23 million chicken neck and back is what we import annually to Jamaica, close to US$13 million in beef offals, beef trimmings US$ 16 million, rice US$84 million.... You may ask why there are so many parts of an animal and rice. Most Jamaicans cannot afford chicken, beef, or fish to feed their families, so they must resort to cuts and trimmings. In other words “Di Pot a boil but di food nuh nuff.” Disclaimer: I am not in the PNP's shadow cabinet, so what I am about to say may not contend. But this is something I've been speaking and writing about for years. I would like you to think for yourself and re-examine with data some long-held beliefs that others have tried to impose on you, saying they are supposed to be in your self-interest. Today, I want to highlight and explain just one and why it is a significant reason why our people remain unhealthy with obesity, high blood pressure, and other primary health ailments. They cannot afford to buy a balanced food basket because the cost of chicken is out of their reach. For decades, Jamaica has had 250% duty protection on chicken meat. Globally, the average import duty rate on chicken in other countries is 24%, so why must it be 250% in Jamaica? (it’s actually 260%) Is this really in our people's national interest, or are we serving the interest of a very few individuals, in particular 2 companies? Before you have a knee-jerk reaction to 'yes, it helps local production," let us look at the data rather than an emotion. The International cost breakdown of a chicken is feed (largely corn) at 61%, baby chicks at 18%, housing at 7%, others at 10%, and labor at only 4%. We do not make feed in Jamaica. We don't produce corn. We don't produce wheat or soybean; the inputs that go into feed. What we refer to as feed mills in Jamaica are really big silos and a mixer that blends these imported inputs into the final product, much the same as concrete is composed of sand, stone, cement, and water. But at least in concrete, all the inputs are produced in Jamaica, so the "local " feed is a totally imported product. So, in effect, the local Jamaican direct cost input of chicken is less than 10%. Therefore, I challenge the logic of providing excessive duty protection to any product with a local input of less than 20%, much less chicken, whose input is less than 10%. All the inputs in animal feed are traded as commodities on the world market, like oil; the price fluctuates in keeping with the law of supply and demand. The price of corn has fallen from $801 (US/Bu) April 2022 ,to less than $392.50today ( Check it yourself on on straight mathematical terms with 50% reduction in the cost of feed which represents 61% of the cost input of chicken our chicken prices should have gone down by about 30%, but instead it went up. Who benefits? Certainly not the Jamaican public whose citizens find it hard to afford a whole chicken dinner, certainly not the workers at the factory whose pay remains much the same, and certainly not the Jamaican economy as there has been little or no growth in our agricultural sector generally for years. Did you know that if you apply for a permit to import a container of chicken in any form, the ministry of agriculture first refers the matter to the two chicken monopoly producers to find out if they have any objections? Tell them to challenge me on this! What do you think is their response? With that system in place, there is effectively no real competition in the marketplace. In fact there is no marketplace. You pay what the two local monopolies decide you should pay. Since it’s so obvious, you will wonder why this backward policy has continued. Well, the false theory is that we are saving the livelihood of the 30,000 small farmers. But is this really true?

Lisa Hanna™️

32,499 views • 2 years ago

Iowa has some of the best farmland in the country but “we import 95% of our food” in the state “0.03% of our acres out of 24 million acres, it's roughly 9,000 acres in Iowa, is used to produce any produce food that will end up on your plate in its original form” “So it's primarily, it's all chemicals — they're producing ethanol, they're producing feed that will then be shipped out of state for animals and shipped out of our country for animals. Iowa has the best farmland in the world, I would say, and we import 95% of our food.” So there's a big movement of people that want to see, you know, homesteading and smaller farms crop up. But when you have out-of-state investors that are coming in and buying up land and jacking up the price of land, there's not one young person that can afford to get on land.”
1:22

Iowa has some of the best farmland in the country but “we import 95% of our food” in the state “0.03% of our acres out of 24 million acres, it's roughly 9,000 acres in Iowa, is used to produce any produce food that will end up on your plate in its original form” “So it's primarily, it's all chemicals — they're producing ethanol, they're producing feed that will then be shipped out of state for animals and shipped out of our country for animals. Iowa has the best farmland in the world, I would say, and we import 95% of our food.” So there's a big movement of people that want to see, you know, homesteading and smaller farms crop up. But when you have out-of-state investors that are coming in and buying up land and jacking up the price of land, there's not one young person that can afford to get on land.”

Wall Street Apes

113,901 views • 4 months ago

Everyday tens of millions are spent to convince you that your headache is caused by the lack of advil… your weeds..crops need more cides, yields are a direct result of nutrients applied. What’s interesting about agriculture… what can be derived from Shay Foulk statistic shared last week. We have roughly 50,000 larger operations that decide how/what to apply to 80% + of the roughly 250 million acres of industrial farm land. There are MORE people that make commission..a living selling these products to US than there are… US That 500k seed bill… trickles down to 20% commission That 1 million in fertilizer 350k chem bill … This isn’t saying we don’t need any of it What I’m saying is there is very few that are looking at this whole ag economic engine with the motive to create better systems for the prosperity of the typical large scale production agriculture operator. What we do have are substantial subsidized crop insurance programs with rules attached to them… to keep you stuck in this system to benefit all of those companies that employ all of those people that are deriving commission off of your conformity. What you’re seeing here… what I’m talking about is taking these same 80/20 principles I just described and using the market of nature to sequence plants … and animals in a way that gives us a chance to farm with less advil.. because we address the root or the headache. Relying on getting your answers from your dealer instead of creating your own system
3:09

Everyday tens of millions are spent to convince you that your headache is caused by the lack of advil… your weeds..crops need more cides, yields are a direct result of nutrients applied. What’s interesting about agriculture… what can be derived from Shay Foulk statistic shared last week. We have roughly 50,000 larger operations that decide how/what to apply to 80% + of the roughly 250 million acres of industrial farm land. There are MORE people that make commission..a living selling these products to US than there are… US That 500k seed bill… trickles down to 20% commission That 1 million in fertilizer 350k chem bill … This isn’t saying we don’t need any of it What I’m saying is there is very few that are looking at this whole ag economic engine with the motive to create better systems for the prosperity of the typical large scale production agriculture operator. What we do have are substantial subsidized crop insurance programs with rules attached to them… to keep you stuck in this system to benefit all of those companies that employ all of those people that are deriving commission off of your conformity. What you’re seeing here… what I’m talking about is taking these same 80/20 principles I just described and using the market of nature to sequence plants … and animals in a way that gives us a chance to farm with less advil.. because we address the root or the headache. Relying on getting your answers from your dealer instead of creating your own system

Jason Mauck

31,070 views • 4 months ago

This is one of the hardest things we have ever had to share. We are not the kind of people who like to ask for help. We have always believed in putting our heads down, working hard, trusting God, and doing everything we can to carry the weight ourselves. But there comes a point where the truth is bigger than pride, and our customers, followers, supporters, and everyone deserves to know what is really happening. Right now, we are in a legal battle with a major meat processor. And while this fight has our name on it, it is much bigger than our family alone. Small producers, family ranchers, and farmers spend generations building something they are proud of, only to come up against an industry that too often protects power over people, profit over principle, and control over transparency. The effects do not stop with the people raising the food. They reach every person purchasing meat because corruption and lack of transparency in the beef industry affect the food system as a whole and the trust families place in what they buy and feed their loved ones. This fight has cost us deeply. Between personal health struggles and the weight of this battle, we have had to make sacrifices we never wanted to make. We have had to cut back on our restaurants and e-commerce. We have sold cattle to help pay attorney fees. We have carried stress, heartbreak, and pressure that, at times, have felt impossible to explain. But we are still here, and we are still fighting. We are fighting for our family, for our ranch, for the values we were raised on, and for every small rancher and farmer who has ever felt crushed under a system that was never built to protect them. So today, we are asking for help. If you believe in family ranches, quality food, hard work, and a more transparent, healthy, and clean food system, please stand with us. One of the best ways you can support us right now is by purchasing our beef at We started a GoFundMe for those who want to be part of something bigger than our family alone. If you want to help us keep fighting, please consider donating and helping us fight for farmers, ranchers:
1:15

This is one of the hardest things we have ever had to share. We are not the kind of people who like to ask for help. We have always believed in putting our heads down, working hard, trusting God, and doing everything we can to carry the weight ourselves. But there comes a point where the truth is bigger than pride, and our customers, followers, supporters, and everyone deserves to know what is really happening. Right now, we are in a legal battle with a major meat processor. And while this fight has our name on it, it is much bigger than our family alone. Small producers, family ranchers, and farmers spend generations building something they are proud of, only to come up against an industry that too often protects power over people, profit over principle, and control over transparency. The effects do not stop with the people raising the food. They reach every person purchasing meat because corruption and lack of transparency in the beef industry affect the food system as a whole and the trust families place in what they buy and feed their loved ones. This fight has cost us deeply. Between personal health struggles and the weight of this battle, we have had to make sacrifices we never wanted to make. We have had to cut back on our restaurants and e-commerce. We have sold cattle to help pay attorney fees. We have carried stress, heartbreak, and pressure that, at times, have felt impossible to explain. But we are still here, and we are still fighting. We are fighting for our family, for our ranch, for the values we were raised on, and for every small rancher and farmer who has ever felt crushed under a system that was never built to protect them. So today, we are asking for help. If you believe in family ranches, quality food, hard work, and a more transparent, healthy, and clean food system, please stand with us. One of the best ways you can support us right now is by purchasing our beef at We started a GoFundMe for those who want to be part of something bigger than our family alone. If you want to help us keep fighting, please consider donating and helping us fight for farmers, ranchers:

Santa Carota Beef

411,556 views • 4 months ago

Actual proof: The food we’re being sold no longer contains nutrients American rancher sent in their meat to be tested against grocery store meat. The nutrients density is 2.7x greater in naturally raised meat “We're just now getting around to releasing the results. They tested us for Omega 6 to Omega 3s, Phytochemicals, B vitamins, Carotenoids. The nuts and bolts of the test came back like this: If you were to eat one of our cheeseburgers Compared to the grocery store meat, you would have to eat 2.7 cheeseburgers, which looks a little bit like this. There we go. (In video) Our nutrients are 2.7 times better than what the grocery store meat is.” Our food is fake in America
0:59

Actual proof: The food we’re being sold no longer contains nutrients American rancher sent in their meat to be tested against grocery store meat. The nutrients density is 2.7x greater in naturally raised meat “We're just now getting around to releasing the results. They tested us for Omega 6 to Omega 3s, Phytochemicals, B vitamins, Carotenoids. The nuts and bolts of the test came back like this: If you were to eat one of our cheeseburgers Compared to the grocery store meat, you would have to eat 2.7 cheeseburgers, which looks a little bit like this. There we go. (In video) Our nutrients are 2.7 times better than what the grocery store meat is.” Our food is fake in America

Wall Street Apes

799,395 views • 1 year ago

‼️URGENT: SIGN PETITION TO SEND THE ESCAPED MILITARY HORSES TO A SANCTUARY‼️ Petition: We all are shocked by the images of the blood-covered horses, that were running through London today morning. This horrifying image is a clear display of how we treat animals in today's society. Animals in distress have been escaping from slaughterhouses, farms and this time from a military rehearsal. We have to do better. These horses have served their country through no choice of their own. Now, it is time for us to serve them. ‼️We are urgently calling for those horses to be sent to a sanctuary where they can live out the rest of their lives in peace‼️
0:20

‼️URGENT: SIGN PETITION TO SEND THE ESCAPED MILITARY HORSES TO A SANCTUARY‼️ Petition: We all are shocked by the images of the blood-covered horses, that were running through London today morning. This horrifying image is a clear display of how we treat animals in today's society. Animals in distress have been escaping from slaughterhouses, farms and this time from a military rehearsal. We have to do better. These horses have served their country through no choice of their own. Now, it is time for us to serve them. ‼️We are urgently calling for those horses to be sent to a sanctuary where they can live out the rest of their lives in peace‼️

Animal Rising

62,786 views • 2 years ago

Our Humanity and Compassion Should Find Expression In Everything That We Do. According to the World Health Organization World Health Organization (WHO), one in three people, around three billion in total worldwide, suffer from some element of malnutrition — either not enough to eat, nothing to eat at all, the wrong kinds of calories, or too much to eat. Paradoxically, roughly a third of the world's food goes to waste. Sadhguru explains how this is not a failure of agriculture, but a failure of human heart. #SaveSoil #ConsciousPlanet
1:13

Our Humanity and Compassion Should Find Expression In Everything That We Do. According to the World Health Organization World Health Organization (WHO), one in three people, around three billion in total worldwide, suffer from some element of malnutrition — either not enough to eat, nothing to eat at all, the wrong kinds of calories, or too much to eat. Paradoxically, roughly a third of the world's food goes to waste. Sadhguru explains how this is not a failure of agriculture, but a failure of human heart. #SaveSoil #ConsciousPlanet

Conscious Planet #SaveSoil

16,086 views • 2 years ago

What is the point of lab grown meat? 🤔 🔊 1) The energy cost is dramatically more expensive than just raising chicken and cattle the traditional way. 2 The concept doesn’t scale. We will never be able to make billions of pounds of lab grown meat. They will struggle to reach 1%. 3) Most people prefer a more traditional meat. Not an artificial lab product.
0:57

What is the point of lab grown meat? 🤔 🔊 1) The energy cost is dramatically more expensive than just raising chicken and cattle the traditional way. 2 The concept doesn’t scale. We will never be able to make billions of pounds of lab grown meat. They will struggle to reach 1%. 3) Most people prefer a more traditional meat. Not an artificial lab product.

Wall Street Mav

1,939,504 views • 3 years ago

This is UK today and we all know who is doing it, the python they feed. It has grown so big and has started attacking them. UK refused to feed those protective African mammals rather they steal from them and exploit their resources to feed those that are attacking them today. What have we done to God to deserve what UK has done to us? BBC UK Prime Minister Declassified UK this same UK were responsible for the death of over 5million Biafrans in the 60s and still counting. This same UK, we watched on a video where the terrorist Nigeria national security adviser was begging them for solution that they have in their palm
1:34

This is UK today and we all know who is doing it, the python they feed. It has grown so big and has started attacking them. UK refused to feed those protective African mammals rather they steal from them and exploit their resources to feed those that are attacking them today. What have we done to God to deserve what UK has done to us? BBC UK Prime Minister Declassified UK this same UK were responsible for the death of over 5million Biafrans in the 60s and still counting. This same UK, we watched on a video where the terrorist Nigeria national security adviser was begging them for solution that they have in their palm

Simon Ekpa

183,518 views • 2 years ago

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reveals that BlackRock is quietly acquiring control of the meat and pharmaceutical markets. “BlackRock owns all the meat packers. There's only 4 meat packers in this country. BlackRock owns them all. You can say to them, you need to do an antitrust suits against those meat packers. The meat packers are keeping the price of meat high and the price of cows low. So the farmer gets hurt, the consumers get hurt and they make the money 'cause they've got a monopoly.” “BlackRock owns all the pharmaceutical companies and we can start regulating the pharmaceutical companies so that they behave less like a cartel.”
0:35

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reveals that BlackRock is quietly acquiring control of the meat and pharmaceutical markets. “BlackRock owns all the meat packers. There's only 4 meat packers in this country. BlackRock owns them all. You can say to them, you need to do an antitrust suits against those meat packers. The meat packers are keeping the price of meat high and the price of cows low. So the farmer gets hurt, the consumers get hurt and they make the money 'cause they've got a monopoly.” “BlackRock owns all the pharmaceutical companies and we can start regulating the pharmaceutical companies so that they behave less like a cartel.”

Based Jessica

1,491,366 views • 8 months ago

EXCLUSIVE - Wilton Simpson on the newly-signed farm bill: "Now, any solar panel farm that is decommissioned the Department of Agriculture has the first right of refusal to buy that property. We are going to then strip it of its development rights and sell it back into the farming community." "The goal is for the long term benefit of Florida as those solar farms, because they bought a lot of good agriculture land - as those get decommissioned, and starting in about 20 years, we will start putting that back into production agriculture." "Which, by the way, plays right into the Wildlife Corridor, the Rural and Family Lands Program, of preserving the part of Florida we need for generations to go."
2:21

EXCLUSIVE - Wilton Simpson on the newly-signed farm bill: "Now, any solar panel farm that is decommissioned the Department of Agriculture has the first right of refusal to buy that property. We are going to then strip it of its development rights and sell it back into the farming community." "The goal is for the long term benefit of Florida as those solar farms, because they bought a lot of good agriculture land - as those get decommissioned, and starting in about 20 years, we will start putting that back into production agriculture." "Which, by the way, plays right into the Wildlife Corridor, the Rural and Family Lands Program, of preserving the part of Florida we need for generations to go."

Florida’s Voice

10,031 views • 1 year ago