Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

When Governor Healey was recently asked a question about offshore wind, her first answer wasn’t affordability or reliability. It was jobs and billions in sunk costs. Are ratepayers being crushed by soaring energy bills to fund an out-of-control make-work jobs program?

10,605 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

33 Yorum

RIP MASSACHUSETTS profil fotoğrafı
RIP MASSACHUSETTS7 ay önce

No-Jobs Governor Healey & Mayor Wu

Buckster112 profil fotoğrafı
Buckster1127 ay önce

Taxation without representation is what they are doing.

Joanne Feaster profil fotoğrafı
Joanne Feaster7 ay önce

MASSACHUSETTS … here’s the SYSTEMS APPROACH to resolving this mess: VOTE INDEPENDENT 2026!

D. Paul Whitney profil fotoğrafı
D. Paul Whitney7 ay önce

Gov. Healey should prepare for her next career as a used windmill salesperson.

Duncan F. Macleod profil fotoğrafı
Duncan F. Macleod7 ay önce

I would rather have more money in my pocket than less carbon in the air! @MassGovernor is TOTALLY OUT-OF-TOUCH with Massachusetts Rate Payers!!!!

Pasta profil fotoğrafı
Pasta7 ay önce

And simultaneously driving campaign contributions and donations???

RiG profil fotoğrafı
RiG7 ay önce

My gas bill is 546. with a 10 percent reduction that has to be paid back in later months. This woman is costing residence here a fortune.

Anthony Santagati profil fotoğrafı
Anthony Santagati7 ay önce

This woman is an imbecile! We are funding a green energy policy that is financially taxing the citizens of Massachusetts and will for many years. In the end we might generate 5% of the power we need.

Bill Heller profil fotoğrafı
Bill Heller7 ay önce

It's really a make lobbyists and government cronies rich program.

Dan E profil fotoğrafı
Dan E7 ay önce

Wind energy will NEVER pay for itself let alone turn a profit or lower costs, and the state will never be able to maintain the maintenance and operation costs to keep them working. It's all about political payoffs and campaign donations.

BIGWAVE BRAND profil fotoğrafı
BIGWAVE BRAND7 ay önce

Yes,the argument migrated from endless ‘free’ energy to a jobs initiative because offshore wind is a destructive environmental menace with no redeeming energy effects.

Randy profil fotoğrafı
Randy7 ay önce

Go down towards Bourne bridge look over the bog you’ll see the 10 year old wind turbines broken off this is what happens when you build a energy system that subject to change and now china owns the rites to the turbine blades and we can’t get rid of them because they have to go back to china’s 🤣😂🦶🇺🇸

Patrick Saliga profil fotoğrafı
Patrick Saliga7 ay önce

Don Quixote chases windmills of the coast of Canada will Massachusetts taxpayers get soaked did anybody tell her that the United States has almost an infinite supply of natural gas? Why are we not building gas turbines reliable energy efficient gas turbines question

Brandi profil fotoğrafı
Brandi7 ay önce

Can you say kick back $$$

Sissy profil fotoğrafı
Sissy7 ay önce

dump net zero,, I'm not paying through the nose so she can boast about *jobs created* NOT ON MY DIME.

GolfNewEngland profil fotoğrafı
GolfNewEngland7 ay önce

It's called union payoffs..

Thomas DeMattia profil fotoğrafı
Thomas DeMattia7 ay önce

Jobs, we are bleeding jobs in the state every day; some are closing and consolidating to other locations in the country Everything you do adds to the cost of doing business

long bow profil fotoğrafı
long bow7 ay önce

No worry Bruce Springsteen is putting on a politically charged concert in Boston soon! That’ll make things better (NOT!)

buzzseq profil fotoğrafı
buzzseq7 ay önce

Correct me if I am wrong - didn't the contractors bring in their specialized workers for these jobs...

Burn profil fotoğrafı
Burn7 ay önce

How much is she getting in kickback??

RLR profil fotoğrafı
RLR7 ay önce

Mass dem queens MUST be INVESTIGATED Wu's "gift" to Pressly

D Jones profil fotoğrafı
D Jones7 ay önce

such a bullshit artist 🧑‍🎨

shenshenglu profil fotoğrafı
shenshenglu7 ay önce

Put the wind farm in Arlington.

Frank Haggerty profil fotoğrafı
Frank Haggerty7 ay önce

Trump appeals court order voiding offshore wind permit ban February 17, 2026

WhalePolitik profil fotoğrafı
WhalePolitik7 ay önce

Maura Healy is a "whale killing bastard" who as attorney general defended the fishing industry in federal court when it was being prosecuted for killing endangered whales in violation of the Endangered Species Act.

John McGovern profil fotoğrafı
John McGovern7 ay önce

she needs a major dose of milton friedman

Jonny D profil fotoğrafı
Jonny D7 ay önce

Healey is a LIAR

Alex Sap profil fotoğrafı
Alex Sap7 ay önce

All women in key positions ask yourself why ???!!

RJ King profil fotoğrafı
RJ King7 ay önce

She's a go getter. She's really crushing those energy costs. They're through the roof.

safer cycling profil fotoğrafı
safer cycling7 ay önce

Massachusetts governments, state, county and municipal, have and will always be primarily be in place to fund out-of-control make-work jobs programs. And remember, with the jobs comes the pensions with the associated unfunded liabilities needing to be covered by taxpayers.

Ellen negoshian profil fotoğrafı
Ellen negoshian7 ay önce

Look into wind turbines workers are in complete Hazmat suits while working on them. This should alert you Check into solar panels Lots of bad cancers out there FACT

Rachel profil fotoğrafı
Rachel7 ay önce

Word salad for you.

Jane Andrews profil fotoğrafı
Jane Andrews7 ay önce

Yes. The Green-New-Deal ecosystem runs on ratepayers.

Benzer Videolar

In 1997, a developer publicly humiliated Steve Jobs in front of a packed room. Jobs had just returned to Apple after 11 years away. Instead of fighting back, he admitted the guy was partly right — then explained the principle he believed could turn Apple into an $8–10 billion-a-year business. And his answer had almost nothing to do with technology. Most companies, Jobs explained, work backwards. They build something technically impressive, fall in love with what they created, and only then ask how they are going to sell it. He had made that mistake himself so many times that he said he had the “scar tissue” to prove it. His rule was the opposite: start with the customer experience and work backwards to the technology. Jobs used the LaserWriter as an example. Inside the printer were a Canon laser engine, an Apple-designed controller, Adobe PostScript and AppleTalk. It was an extraordinary piece of engineering, but none of that was the reason he believed people would buy it. When the first page came out, Jobs looked at it and realized they didn't need to explain what was inside the machine. They could simply hold up the result and ask one question: Do you want this? That was the entire point. Customers don't pay you for how difficult your product was to build. They pay for what it does for them. A developer tried to expose what Steve Jobs didn't know about technology. Jobs responded by explaining something far more valuable about business.

Mr Green

227,037 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Why can’t politicians just answer simple questions about their job? Sophy Ridge asked Defence Secretary Wes Streeting a straightforward question he should have been ready for. You’d expect the person in charge of defence to have a clear position on the spending target for his own department, yet he repeatedly dodged it. She asked if he agreed with his predecessor John Healey, who said he was certain Britain should reach 3% of GDP on defence by 2030: “Are you also certain about 3% of GDP by 2030? Is that a target?” Streeting: “I endorsed John Healey’s resignation letter wholeheartedly at the time. What you will see from Andy Burnham and John Healey as prime minister and chancellor is a commitment to make sure the defence investment plan is fully funded.” That’s not an answer. Sophy cut in: “I’m going to have to come in again. You are the Defence Secretary, do you believe in the target of spending 3% of GDP on defence by 2030?” He again referred back to agreeing with Healey and then talked at length about setting out “what we will fund and how we will fund it.” Still no direct answer. Clearly frustrated, Sophy tried once more: “I’m not asking you to set out how you’re going to fund it. I’m asking, do you believe in the target that we should be spending 3% by 2030?” His reply? He wouldn’t answer because the next question would be about how to fund it. That is a ridiculous reason to refuse a basic question about your own brief. Just answer it. Absolutely pathetic.

J Stewart

41,512 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce