Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨 When Justice Kagan told Trump’s lawyer he was using “obscure sources,” he didn’t back down. He cited the Framers of the Constitution directly. Point-blank: The framers of the 14th Amendment made it crystal clear — birthright citizenship requires full allegiance to America, not to any foreign power. President... show more

GRANDPA’s FREE ADVICE

115,073 subscribers

203,878 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

BREAKING: Stephen Miller just reacted to the SCOTUS ruling on Birthright Citizenship, and he didn't hold back for a SINGLE SECOND: "This is absolutely a deep knife wound in the heart of the American republic." "There is no possible reading of the 14th Amendment that applies to foreigners with foreign loyalties, foreign citizenship, foreign obligations, foreign everything." "If your ruling requires you to suicide your civilization, your reading of the Constitution is wrong."

BREAKING: Stephen Miller just reacted to the SCOTUS ruling on Birthright Citizenship, and he didn't hold back for a SINGLE SECOND: "This is absolutely a deep knife wound in the heart of the American republic." "There is no possible reading of the 14th Amendment that applies to foreigners with foreign loyalties, foreign citizenship, foreign obligations, foreign everything." "If your ruling requires you to suicide your civilization, your reading of the Constitution is wrong."

Andrew Kolvet

160,367 views • 1 month ago

I’m with Carl Higbie. The authors of the 14th Amendment made it pretty clear: birthright citizenship is NOT in the text of the Amendment. It does not take a law degree to figure that out. SCOTUS failed. Congress must act. Anchors Away!

I’m with Carl Higbie. The authors of the 14th Amendment made it pretty clear: birthright citizenship is NOT in the text of the Amendment. It does not take a law degree to figure that out. SCOTUS failed. Congress must act. Anchors Away!

Rep. Andy Ogles

14,947 views • 1 month ago

President Trump commented Wednesday on this week's Supreme Court rulings, calling the decision in the Trump v. Slaughter case a restoration of "tremendous power" to the presidency and the court's most significant ruling of the term. He then criticized the court's birthright citizenship decision, arguing the 14th Amendment was intended to protect the children of formerly enslaved people, not to grant citizenship to the children of noncitizens: "We'll take care of the birthright citizenship."

President Trump commented Wednesday on this week's Supreme Court rulings, calling the decision in the Trump v. Slaughter case a restoration of "tremendous power" to the presidency and the court's most significant ruling of the term. He then criticized the court's birthright citizenship decision, arguing the 14th Amendment was intended to protect the children of formerly enslaved people, not to grant citizenship to the children of noncitizens: "We'll take care of the birthright citizenship."

CBS News

35,638 views • 1 month ago

President trump is asked if he will strip citizenship status from immigrant’s currently in the U.S. if he wins the Birthright Citizenship SCOTUS case Ending birthright citizenship isn’t just another policy; it’s the single greatest move of our lifetime to protect and restore real American culture. This will be legacy-defining for President Trump. A SCOTUS decision is expected in June or July of 2026.

President trump is asked if he will strip citizenship status from immigrant’s currently in the U.S. if he wins the Birthright Citizenship SCOTUS case Ending birthright citizenship isn’t just another policy; it’s the single greatest move of our lifetime to protect and restore real American culture. This will be legacy-defining for President Trump. A SCOTUS decision is expected in June or July of 2026.

MJTruthUltra

174,082 views • 8 months ago

President Trump called on the Supreme Court to study MY analysis of birthright citizenship. Thank you Mr. President! I’ve been making this argument for decades: the 14th Amendment was never intended to grant automatic citizenship based solely on location, but on allegiance to the United States. Now the media is twisting the story, avoiding the substance, and turning it into something it’s not. So I walk through the actual history—Civil Rights Act of 1866, the framers’ intent, and the meaning of “jurisdiction”—and explain why this debate is being misunderstood at every level. If the Court gets this wrong, it won’t be because the Constitution is unclear—it’ll be because it was ignored. This is about law, history, and the truth behind birthright citizenship. Watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

President Trump called on the Supreme Court to study MY analysis of birthright citizenship. Thank you Mr. President! I’ve been making this argument for decades: the 14th Amendment was never intended to grant automatic citizenship based solely on location, but on allegiance to the United States. Now the media is twisting the story, avoiding the substance, and turning it into something it’s not. So I walk through the actual history—Civil Rights Act of 1866, the framers’ intent, and the meaning of “jurisdiction”—and explain why this debate is being misunderstood at every level. If the Court gets this wrong, it won’t be because the Constitution is unclear—it’ll be because it was ignored. This is about law, history, and the truth behind birthright citizenship. Watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

162,596 views • 4 months ago

🚨 NOW: President Trump just witnessed a MASTERCLASS where Solicitor General John Sauer gave a perfect response to Justice John Roberts on birthright citizenship "What does that mean, subject to the jurisdiction thereof? And he says, it means not owing allegiance to ANYBODY ELSE. That is what it means." Illegal aliens owe allegiance to their country of birth, not America. Open and shut.

🚨 NOW: President Trump just witnessed a MASTERCLASS where Solicitor General John Sauer gave a perfect response to Justice John Roberts on birthright citizenship "What does that mean, subject to the jurisdiction thereof? And he says, it means not owing allegiance to ANYBODY ELSE. That is what it means." Illegal aliens owe allegiance to their country of birth, not America. Open and shut.

Eric Daugherty

590,922 views • 4 months ago

.@Neal_Katyal on Trump’s call to end birthright citizenship: “The 14th Amendment is as clear as day that there is no way he can do that. If he tries that, he will lose in court every day of the week.”

.@Neal_Katyal on Trump’s call to end birthright citizenship: “The 14th Amendment is as clear as day that there is no way he can do that. If he tries that, he will lose in court every day of the week.”

The Briefing with Jen Psaki

1,857,957 views • 1 year ago

President Trump criticized American birthright citizenship in a social media post on Monday morning, stating that the 14th Amendment to the Constitution was mean to protect the “babies of slaves” rather than contemporary Americans and immigrants.

President Trump criticized American birthright citizenship in a social media post on Monday morning, stating that the 14th Amendment to the Constitution was mean to protect the “babies of slaves” rather than contemporary Americans and immigrants.

ABC News

39,420 views • 4 months ago

JD Vance tells Margaret Brennan, that since he and Trump disagree with the 14th Amendment’s allowance of birth right citizenship, Trump has the power to amend the constitution. This is fascism.

JD Vance tells Margaret Brennan, that since he and Trump disagree with the 14th Amendment’s allowance of birth right citizenship, Trump has the power to amend the constitution. This is fascism.

Sara Spector

1,573,064 views • 1 year ago

Stephen Miller just Issued The Greatest On-Air TAKEDOWN of Birthright Citizenship You Will EVER See “If your ruling requires you to SUICIDE your civilization, your reading of the Constitution is wrong.” “This is absolutely a deep knife wound in the heart of the American republic.” “There is no possible reading of the 14th Amendment that applies to foreigners with foreign loyalties, foreign citizenship, foreign obligations, foreign everything.” 🔥🔥🔥

Stephen Miller just Issued The Greatest On-Air TAKEDOWN of Birthright Citizenship You Will EVER See “If your ruling requires you to SUICIDE your civilization, your reading of the Constitution is wrong.” “This is absolutely a deep knife wound in the heart of the American republic.” “There is no possible reading of the 14th Amendment that applies to foreigners with foreign loyalties, foreign citizenship, foreign obligations, foreign everything.” 🔥🔥🔥

Benny Johnson

488,828 views • 1 month ago

🚨 The Birthright Citizenship Debate is HEATING UP! 🇺🇸 Did you know the 14th Amendment, granting birthright citizenship, was created to PROTECT newly freed Black slaves after the Civil War? Our Founders had a clear purpose: to secure rights for those who’d been denied freedom, NOT to open the door for unchecked immigration from every corner of the globe. 🌍 The SPIRIT of this law was about justice, NOT a free pass for anyone born on U.S. soil. Today, some argue it’s being misused, rewarding illegal immigration and straining our system. 🤔Should we rethink birthright citizenship to honor its original intent? Drop your thoughts below—this is a convo we NEED to have! 🔥 #BirthrightCitizenship #14thAmendment #ImmigrationDebate

🚨 The Birthright Citizenship Debate is HEATING UP! 🇺🇸 Did you know the 14th Amendment, granting birthright citizenship, was created to PROTECT newly freed Black slaves after the Civil War? Our Founders had a clear purpose: to secure rights for those who’d been denied freedom, NOT to open the door for unchecked immigration from every corner of the globe. 🌍 The SPIRIT of this law was about justice, NOT a free pass for anyone born on U.S. soil. Today, some argue it’s being misused, rewarding illegal immigration and straining our system. 🤔Should we rethink birthright citizenship to honor its original intent? Drop your thoughts below—this is a convo we NEED to have! 🔥 #BirthrightCitizenship #14thAmendment #ImmigrationDebate

Project Constitution

29,657 views • 1 year ago

It is no coincidence that the fight to protect and defend our Constitution’s citizenship clause began in the Live Free of Die State of New Hampshire. Today, that case is before the United States Supreme Court. While our Constitution doesn’t always give us the gift of clarity, in the case of birthright citizenship, the 14th Amendment is clear: if you were born in America, you are an American citizen. Period.

It is no coincidence that the fight to protect and defend our Constitution’s citizenship clause began in the Live Free of Die State of New Hampshire. Today, that case is before the United States Supreme Court. While our Constitution doesn’t always give us the gift of clarity, in the case of birthright citizenship, the 14th Amendment is clear: if you were born in America, you are an American citizen. Period.

Congresswoman Maggie Goodlander

25,472 views • 4 months ago

Justice Kavanaugh delivered one of the sharper exchanges in the birthright citizenship arguments, pressing Solicitor General Sauer on why the 14th Amendment used different language than the Civil Rights Act of 1866 if they were meant to say the same thing. Sauer answered directly: The Court has long held they mean the same thing. The framers preferred the positive formulation "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" to clear up ambiguity with "Indians not taxed" while keeping the core requirement of full allegiance intact. Congressional records show they explicitly understood they were doing the same thing. Kavanaugh also noted Congress repeated that exact language in the 1940 and 1952 Immigration Acts. Sauer explained this was Congress codifying the constitutional baseline, not adopting a broader view. The structure of the statute treats subsection (a) as the constitutional floor and adds statutory citizenship categories beyond it. Justice Barrett then zoomed out on jus soli versus jus sanguinis, questioning how the Amendment blends elements of both. Sauer described it as a modified jus soli that still demands a relationship of allegiance to the sovereign, consistent with even English common law sources like Calvin's Case. This entire line of questioning reinforces what conservatives have argued for years: the 14th Amendment was never meant to be an open-ended grant of citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil regardless of parental allegiance or lawful status. Modern interpretations have stretched it far beyond the framers' design.

Justice Kavanaugh delivered one of the sharper exchanges in the birthright citizenship arguments, pressing Solicitor General Sauer on why the 14th Amendment used different language than the Civil Rights Act of 1866 if they were meant to say the same thing. Sauer answered directly: The Court has long held they mean the same thing. The framers preferred the positive formulation "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" to clear up ambiguity with "Indians not taxed" while keeping the core requirement of full allegiance intact. Congressional records show they explicitly understood they were doing the same thing. Kavanaugh also noted Congress repeated that exact language in the 1940 and 1952 Immigration Acts. Sauer explained this was Congress codifying the constitutional baseline, not adopting a broader view. The structure of the statute treats subsection (a) as the constitutional floor and adds statutory citizenship categories beyond it. Justice Barrett then zoomed out on jus soli versus jus sanguinis, questioning how the Amendment blends elements of both. Sauer described it as a modified jus soli that still demands a relationship of allegiance to the sovereign, consistent with even English common law sources like Calvin's Case. This entire line of questioning reinforces what conservatives have argued for years: the 14th Amendment was never meant to be an open-ended grant of citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil regardless of parental allegiance or lawful status. Modern interpretations have stretched it far beyond the framers' design.

Gunther Eagleman™

483,351 views • 4 months ago

🚨Governor DeSantis reacts to SCOTUS allowing the invasion of America to continue via “birthright citizenship” Says the purpose of the 14th Amendment is to give freed slaves citizenship, not for “birth tourism”. “The Supreme Court said Dred Scott wasn't a citizen because he was black. He couldn't sue. And Lincoln rejected that. And so what they wanted to say is, wait a minute. No, you're a citizen regardless of race. And we're going to correct that injustice. That was the purpose of it. It was not to have people show up from China for two weeks, have babies, get them citizenship and then go back to China. I mean, how ridiculous has this become?”

🚨Governor DeSantis reacts to SCOTUS allowing the invasion of America to continue via “birthright citizenship” Says the purpose of the 14th Amendment is to give freed slaves citizenship, not for “birth tourism”. “The Supreme Court said Dred Scott wasn't a citizen because he was black. He couldn't sue. And Lincoln rejected that. And so what they wanted to say is, wait a minute. No, you're a citizen regardless of race. And we're going to correct that injustice. That was the purpose of it. It was not to have people show up from China for two weeks, have babies, get them citizenship and then go back to China. I mean, how ridiculous has this become?”

Chris Nelson 🏝️🇺🇸

31,551 views • 1 month ago