Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

When the action heats up before the camera, why not join in the fun? 📽️Sensational throat 🌟#Connie Thomas Stone XXX Kalman Otto #threesomeMMF #onlyblowjob #threesomefun #hotchick #bigdicks #muscle #pornshoot #sharing #pussyeating #jousting #doubleblowjob #indoorski

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

‼️When Dan Schaffer Ran Turning Point's Security He Says He Always Coordinated A Plan With The Hospital A Week Or Two Out—So Why Didn’t Brian Harpole?🤔 Greg Schaffer just explained the part of a Turning Point security plan nobody wanted on camera. Before the event, not after the shot. He sat down with the local hospital. That was his SOP when Schaffer Security Group still had the contract — 11 years military, 20 years FBI, Turning Point as his first client. A week or two before a packed campus stop he was already on the phone with local police and the hospital, building an action plan if somebody got hit. Venue, catering, 4,500 students, 15 of his own retired cops and soldiers on the ground. The hospital was not an afterthought. It was on the call logs before anyone showed up. After Brian Harpole and Dan Flood underbid Schaffer and poached the contract, they then walked off with the job. September 10 at UVU was on their watch. Produce the hospital contact. The date. The name on the other end. The trauma plan Timpanogos or whoever was supposed to run if Charlie went down. Schaffer is on tape saying that call happens a week or two out, every time. If Harpole made it, the call logs will show it. If he didn’t, then Charlie’s security chief skipped the one coordination that exists specifically for the moment a speaker gets shot — and he still has not explained why. Schaffer’s clip is the standard. What happened at UVU under Harpole's watch is the deviation. Make him explain the gap.

Project Constitution

43,181 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Rich Roll on why waiting to "feel like it" is a trap: "You can't think your way into the mood that you seek or the state of mind that you aspire to inhabit. Action is the only thing that can trigger that change." Rich uses running as the perfect illustration of this principle. Imagine you wake up in the morning and you're supposed to do a run because you're training for a race. You don't feel like it. So what do most of us do? "We all resort to that state where we think, 'Well, I don't want to do it right now. I'll just wait until I feel like doing it and then I'll do it then.'" But here's the problem with that logic: "If you're waiting until you feel like doing something, chances are you're probably never going to get to it." The mood you're hoping will arrive on its own? It's not coming. Not without action first. "To take the action despite how you feel about it is the thing that catalyzes the state change." You don't run because you feel motivated. You feel motivated because you ran. He points to what every runner knows from experience: "When they finish the run, they're always glad that they did it. They don't generally regret it. And then they feel better." Notice the sequence. The good feeling comes after the action, not before it. The state change is the reward for showing up, not the prerequisite. And this isn't just about running. As Rich puts it: "That example is applicable to all areas of life." The workout you're avoiding. The conversation you're delaying. The project you're putting off until you're "in the right headspace." You're waiting for a feeling that only exists on the other side of doing the thing.

Kevin Tanaka

10,256 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Sheriff department start eviction on the wrong home. Homeowner sees them breaking in on her ring cam while not home. Deputies with the Pasco County Sheriff’s Office in Florida showed up to execute a court-ordered eviction. Before forcing entry, the deputies stood on the porch boasting that this was their third time visiting the property, confidently claiming they knew the house and were familiar with the eviction order. Yet not a single person—not the lead deputy, not his backup, not the property manager, nor the locksmith—bothered to complete the most basic step of their job: reading the house numbers clearly posted on the front of the home. ​Instead of confirming the address, they gave the locksmith the green light to drill into the lock of unit 43. The real eviction order was for unit 47 next door. ​The break-in was only halted because the panicked homeowner spoke through her Ring doorbell system to ask why law enforcement was destroying her front door. Only then did one of the deputies look up, read the giant numbers on the exterior wall, and utter: "Oh sht... this is four three."* ​Even worse, once the mistake was realized, the deputies casually laughed it off on bodycam, sharing stories about previous times they had posted eviction notices on the wrong homes and downplaying the homeowner's terror by repeatedly telling her "it's not a big deal" and "an honest mistake." In the end, the locksmith replaced the damaged deadbolt with a new lock re-keyed to match her existing house keys. The level of incompetence here is unmeasurable. ​Basic reading comprehension shouldn’t be optional when you possess the legal authority to breach a private citizen's . It's cops like these that make things harder for the good ones.

Giggling Ganon

20,413 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Let’s clear this up once, slowly, for the folks in the back clutching the word “RECANTED” like it’s a magic eraser and for the house defendant youtube media. This was not some rogue typo buried in a web article. David Wade was the only reporter Chris Albert didn’t go after. Funny how that works, considering he’s the one who originally said the quiet part out loud. You can spin it. You can shout “recanted.” You can insult people you don’t know. But you can’t un-say something that was broadcast on live television. David Wade said it. On air. Out loud. On camera. He stated that investigators had Ring doorbell video of the incident and that Karen Read’s car had been impounded the very next day before anyone had retrieved Ring footage from anywhere. That’s not a transcription error. That’s not a misprint. That’s a broadcast. One does have to wonder… If investigators told the media on day one that they had Ring doorbell video of the “incident” and had already impounded Karen Read’s car …what was the intended effect? Because statements like that don’t just inform the public they apply pressure on a suspect who hasn’t been indicted yet a defense team still trying to understand the evidence, a narrative forming before facts are verified In other words, the kind of pressure that makes people think about pleading. We’re not saying that’s what happened. We’re saying it’s a fair question especially when the claim aired on TV before any Ring footage was retrieved, the statement later had to be “walked back,” A YEAR LATER!!!!!! and the explanation shifted from certainty to transcription error. If the information was wrong, why was it so specific? If it was premature, why was it broadcast? And if it was neither… why the rush? Because early declarations of “we have video” are powerful. They signal inevitability. They tell a defendant, this is over. So yes it’s reasonable to ask whether that information, intentionally or not, helped move the case forward by shaping perception before proof. That’s not a conspiracy. That’s media literacy. And in a case like this, it matters. Facts first. Narratives second. Pressure tactics last, IF EVER SO, yelling RECANTED!!! in all caps doesn’t rewrite history.

Dixie Normus

25,098 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🚨BOMBSHELL: NEVER-BEFORE-SEEN TPUSA Camera STILLS From Behind Charlie LEAKED From The Day He Was KILLED — Dark Marks VISIBLE On His Hands 😱 Is This The Reason These Camera's Have Been CONCEALED From The PUBLIC? Two shocking still images have just leaked from the camera stationed behind Charlie Kirk during his tragic assassination at UVU! This is the SAME CAMERA that Terryl Farnsworth immediately took down within minutes of the chaos after that fateful bang. Why would they try to conceal this evidence? 🤔 The still images, chilling details emerge — including markings on Charlie Kirk's hands that raise more questions than answers. Taking a close-up look at zoomed-in images of Charlie's left hand reveals a couple of DARK MARKS that raise serious questions. These mysterious marks are not only present in the images captured by TPUSA's camera at UVU, but they can also be seen in the heart-wrenching photo of Charlie in his casket, where Erika stands over him holding his right hand. 🕊️ What do these marks mean? Are they burn marks suggesting evidence of an explosion? Could they be bruises he had from a prior injury? As we piece together the events leading up to this horrifying tragedy, we can't help but wonder what ELSE are they HIDING from the public? For MONTHS, TPUSA has REFUSED to release the full video. The American people deserve to know the truth! We cannot allow important evidence to be kept in the shadows—our right to information is at stake! It’s time to take action! LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD! 📢 Tag Candace Owens and RT to DEMAND that TPUSA release the full footage NOW for the sake of transparency and accountability! Share this post and spread the word! 🕵️‍♂️🔥 Crsedit: Blake FOLLOW Him!

Project Constitution

3,758,982 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Cop pulls family a 1.5 month old baby out of their car at gunpoint because he mistyped their plate in the computer. ​A vehicle, carrying a driver, his girlfriend, and their 1.5-month-old infant, was flagged as stolen out of Little Rock. Officers ordered the driver out with his hands up and immediately placed him in handcuffs and into his car. As backup arrived guns were drawn as they ordered his wife out of the car as well at gunpoint. ​The issue? The vehicle wasn’t stolen at all. The driver’s plate read APX 55X while the plate stolen ended in a Y. This was discovered when the backup officer took it upon himself to call in the plate to double check it. The officer that conducted the stop did zero investigation and could not even take a min to double check the plate before pulling people out with his firearm drawn. The same officer had the nerve to blame the high-stress stop on modern Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR / Flock) camera technology, claiming the automated reader misread the final letter due to scanning angles. However, records and dispatch logs raise critical questions about standard operating procedure: why wasn't the tag visually verified and double-checked against dispatch before drawing weapons and detaining an innocent family? Also there is no mention on the logs of a Flock camera getting a hit and dispatch alerting this officer. This was him making that mistake and now passing the blame on the camera/ AI. ​If this guy is going to have this level of integrity over something like this, what else has he lied about over the years?

Giggling Gannon

339,707 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat