Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

When the action heats up before the camera, why not join in the fun? 📽️Sensational throat 🌟#Connie Thomas Stone XXX Kalman Otto #threesomeMMF #onlyblowjob #threesomefun #hotchick #bigdicks #muscle #pornshoot #sharing #pussyeating #jousting #doubleblowjob #indoorski

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Tucker Carlson: Logical Questions about Thomas Crooks we will eventually need answers to 🔻 Questions: - Was Thomas Crooks known to federal law enforcement before the shooting? - Was he known to local law enforcement before the shooting? And if not, why not? - Who is Willy Tepes and was he known to federal law enforcement? Is Willy Tepes linked to any violent organizations? Is he linked to any governments? And if so, then around the time of the shooting, did the FBI have assets inside those organizations? - If Crooks wasn't known to anyone in a- in authority before the shooting, how was he able to post hundreds of violent extremist comments under his real name between 2019 and 2020 without being detected by law enforcement or intel agencies at a time we know they were monitoring social media? Were those comments, including specific assassination threats against specific public officials, ever reported to YouTube? Other users complained about them. Did YouTube know? Why is the FBI telling us that they'll release this information, quote, "After the trial," when there is no trial? - Why did an FBI agent from the Technical Hazards Response Unit hose down the crime scene the day after the attack? That seems very strange. - What happened on the roof of the American Glass Research Building for the 10 seconds after Crooks's last shot until he was killed by the Secret Service? - Does the FBI have surveillance footage of Thomas Crooks shooting that day? - Was the FBI present at the medical examiner's autopsy? - Are there still blood samples?Can they be examined by outside authorities? When Congress demanded the autopsy, did the FBI restrict what the examiner could tell the Congress? - When the FBI cleared the corner to release Crooks's body for cremation, did they keep tissue samples, brain tissue samples, spinal cord samples, or spinal fluid samples? If the FBI didn't, why not? And who made that decision to destroy what could be critical evidence in an attempted murder case? - FBI agents went to the same gun range that Thomas Crooks was using. Who were those agents and did any of them at any time have any contact with Thomas Crooks? Who did he train with exactly and why can't we know? - Was Thomas Crooks taking drugs that might have turned up on the toxicology report, but that weren't listed somehow? - On what date specifically did FBI agents stop investigating Thomas Crooks's online presence? - Why did the former deputy director of the FBI, Paul Abate, suggest to Congress that Crooks was a right-winger when he clearly wasn't? - Was the FBI aware of Crooks's public comments before the shooting, many of which were openly violent, that included specific assassination attempts involving public officials? - Who was Thomas Crooks in communication with in the days before the attack? What does his burner phone show? And in fact, why did he have a burner phone and encrypted foreign email accounts? - Who are the government officials trying to link Iran to the shooting? - What's on the other dozen accounts that the FBI clearly had access to? - How long had Thomas Crooks been planning to commit an assassination? “If there's nothing there, if they tell you this is just a lone nut who gave no indication he might do this, then what is stopping the FBI from at least giving the facts to Congress? Because if there's nothing there, these should be very easy questions to answer.” Clip Tucker X

MJTruthUltra

42,487 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Rich Roll on why waiting to "feel like it" is a trap: "You can't think your way into the mood that you seek or the state of mind that you aspire to inhabit. Action is the only thing that can trigger that change." Rich uses running as the perfect illustration of this principle. Imagine you wake up in the morning and you're supposed to do a run because you're training for a race. You don't feel like it. So what do most of us do? "We all resort to that state where we think, 'Well, I don't want to do it right now. I'll just wait until I feel like doing it and then I'll do it then.'" But here's the problem with that logic: "If you're waiting until you feel like doing something, chances are you're probably never going to get to it." The mood you're hoping will arrive on its own? It's not coming. Not without action first. "To take the action despite how you feel about it is the thing that catalyzes the state change." You don't run because you feel motivated. You feel motivated because you ran. He points to what every runner knows from experience: "When they finish the run, they're always glad that they did it. They don't generally regret it. And then they feel better." Notice the sequence. The good feeling comes after the action, not before it. The state change is the reward for showing up, not the prerequisite. And this isn't just about running. As Rich puts it: "That example is applicable to all areas of life." The workout you're avoiding. The conversation you're delaying. The project you're putting off until you're "in the right headspace." You're waiting for a feeling that only exists on the other side of doing the thing.

Kevin Tanaka

10,256 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Let’s clear this up once, slowly, for the folks in the back clutching the word “RECANTED” like it’s a magic eraser and for the house defendant youtube media. This was not some rogue typo buried in a web article. David Wade was the only reporter Chris Albert didn’t go after. Funny how that works, considering he’s the one who originally said the quiet part out loud. You can spin it. You can shout “recanted.” You can insult people you don’t know. But you can’t un-say something that was broadcast on live television. David Wade said it. On air. Out loud. On camera. He stated that investigators had Ring doorbell video of the incident and that Karen Read’s car had been impounded the very next day before anyone had retrieved Ring footage from anywhere. That’s not a transcription error. That’s not a misprint. That’s a broadcast. One does have to wonder… If investigators told the media on day one that they had Ring doorbell video of the “incident” and had already impounded Karen Read’s car …what was the intended effect? Because statements like that don’t just inform the public they apply pressure on a suspect who hasn’t been indicted yet a defense team still trying to understand the evidence, a narrative forming before facts are verified In other words, the kind of pressure that makes people think about pleading. We’re not saying that’s what happened. We’re saying it’s a fair question especially when the claim aired on TV before any Ring footage was retrieved, the statement later had to be “walked back,” A YEAR LATER!!!!!! and the explanation shifted from certainty to transcription error. If the information was wrong, why was it so specific? If it was premature, why was it broadcast? And if it was neither… why the rush? Because early declarations of “we have video” are powerful. They signal inevitability. They tell a defendant, this is over. So yes it’s reasonable to ask whether that information, intentionally or not, helped move the case forward by shaping perception before proof. That’s not a conspiracy. That’s media literacy. And in a case like this, it matters. Facts first. Narratives second. Pressure tactics last, IF EVER SO, yelling RECANTED!!! in all caps doesn’t rewrite history.

Dixie Normus

25,098 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🚨BOMBSHELL: NEVER-BEFORE-SEEN TPUSA Camera STILLS From Behind Charlie LEAKED From The Day He Was KILLED — Dark Marks VISIBLE On His Hands 😱 Is This The Reason These Camera's Have Been CONCEALED From The PUBLIC? Two shocking still images have just leaked from the camera stationed behind Charlie Kirk during his tragic assassination at UVU! This is the SAME CAMERA that Terryl Farnsworth immediately took down within minutes of the chaos after that fateful bang. Why would they try to conceal this evidence? 🤔 The still images, chilling details emerge — including markings on Charlie Kirk's hands that raise more questions than answers. Taking a close-up look at zoomed-in images of Charlie's left hand reveals a couple of DARK MARKS that raise serious questions. These mysterious marks are not only present in the images captured by TPUSA's camera at UVU, but they can also be seen in the heart-wrenching photo of Charlie in his casket, where Erika stands over him holding his right hand. 🕊️ What do these marks mean? Are they burn marks suggesting evidence of an explosion? Could they be bruises he had from a prior injury? As we piece together the events leading up to this horrifying tragedy, we can't help but wonder what ELSE are they HIDING from the public? For MONTHS, TPUSA has REFUSED to release the full video. The American people deserve to know the truth! We cannot allow important evidence to be kept in the shadows—our right to information is at stake! It’s time to take action! LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD! 📢 Tag Candace Owens and RT to DEMAND that TPUSA release the full footage NOW for the sake of transparency and accountability! Share this post and spread the word! 🕵️‍♂️🔥 Crsedit: Blake FOLLOW Him!

Project Constitution

3,737,965 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

What happened in Question Period today could not have been clearer. I asked the Premier and the Attorney General a straightforward question: why did they tell British Columbians, on August 11, again on October 29, and again inside the Legislature, that they were filing a stay of the Cowichan ruling, when the truth is that nothing has been filed at all? Four months have passed since that ruling came down, and there is still no stay application before the court. Not a single document. Not a single motion. Nothing. And yet the government keeps insisting they’re “working on it.” When I confronted the Attorney General with this in Question Period, she gave the same scripted line: they’re “hard at work,” they’re “meeting with landowners,” and they “announced” that a stay was coming. But announcing something isn’t the same as doing it. Homeowners don’t need an announcement. They need action. And the court registry shows that action is exactly what this government has refused to take. She even tried to argue there’s “no deadline” for filing a stay, as if that excuses months of inaction while mortgages are being denied, investments are collapsing, and Richmond residents are left in legal limbo. The government had six years to engage with the people whose land was on the line. They did nothing. They had four months since the ruling. They’ve still done nothing. They were warned again and again that the consequences would be severe. They still did nothing. And when I pressed them on why they didn’t involve homeowners six years ago, when the case first appeared, they had no answer. Because there is no answer. They abandoned private property owners until the ruling landed like a bomb, and now they want credit for “meeting with affected landowners” after the damage is already done. I asked them today why they told the public they were filing a stay when they weren’t. Why they said action was underway when the docket was empty. Why they reassured British Columbians while doing nothing behind the scenes. They couldn’t answer any of it. This government keeps pretending it fought to protect private property rights at trial. But if that were true, the judge would never have had to point out, explicitly, that neither the province nor the federal government argued that Crown grants extinguished title. Their claim that they “stood up for the Land Titles Act” simply does not match the court record. Homeowners deserve honesty. They deserve certainty. And they deserve a government that doesn’t say one thing in public and do the opposite in private. The Premier told British Columbians he was filing a stay. The Attorney General told British Columbians she was filing a stay. Question Period made it painfully obvious that neither of them ever did. And neither I nor the BC Conservatives are going to let them get away with it. #bcpoli #cdnpoli

John Rustad

32,632 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

$100k a month from "gifts" 🤯 PinkyDoll is making over 6 figures a month on TikTok pretending to be an NPC. Why on earth does this work? - It's immediately recognisable, - We like sounds, and - We loooove instant gratification. 1️⃣ It's almost meme-like. We see it and we immediately relate to it. Whether you consciously know what she's doing or not, your brain has seen this before if you've played games in the past. The 🧠 IT KNOWS! 2️⃣ Short sounds are everywhere. Most primitive, they're in our language as we make syllables but they also make up a lot of our common expressions like oh, ah, uh huh, yuk, etc... However, short sounds are everywhere online, in the devices we use and even real life! Like in games when going up levels or receiving a new item. Mobile phones with haptic sounds, notifications, the battery is charging. Or even the toaster when that glorious "pop" is heard. Add to that... 3️⃣ The instant gratification and you know the dopamine hit is real! People send these "gifts" and an action and sound are produced. I'm not into TikTok so I had no idea about "gifts" until now, but my guess is these gifts/rewards are mostly used as a "thank you" in the platform... Like a donation or a "buy a coffee" to a creator you like. However, with PinkyDoll, you get "more" You get a specific action and sound instantly on her lives which (some) people simply love. Another thing is anticipation. Anticipation and not knowing what sound/reaction is coming can also be extremely addictive! So whether you vibe with it or not... Don't hate the player, hate the game. Gang gang. Prrr prrr What do think? And why else do you think this works? 🤔 Let me know in the comments 👇

Greg

35,482 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

𝗗𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗱 𝗝. 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗵 𝗦𝗼𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗣𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗩𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗼 𝟬𝟱:𝟱𝟵 𝗣𝗠 𝗘𝗦𝗧 𝟬𝟰.𝟮𝟮.𝟮𝟲 President Trump posted an important video from Michael Savage on BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP with the text also below: "Welcome to the Savage Nation. Today’s brief, abbreviated discussion will be about the arguments that I just listened to before the Supreme Court about birthright citizenship. I was somewhat incensed by listening to the arguments because all I heard was legalese being bandied back and forth, and quite noticeable to me was that the person bringing the arguments in favor of flooding America with illegal aliens to change the demographics forever was a Chinese American who looks to me like the classic ACLU attorney. Very smart, very evil, and very devious. The ACLU is the head of the snake. They have been forever, and there they were again trying to turn America into a cesspool. We all know that these arguments should not be conducted in the abstract of a courtroom. This is really not about law. This is about public opinion. Now, I could start arguing about the Constitution itself, and I’ll run into a stone wall with you. We can’t modify the Constitution because it’s written in stone, and if we do, they’ll take away our First and Second amendment, which is what they would do. So that’s the problem. The Constitution was written before air travel, needless to say, before television, before the internet, before radio, and air you could ask, how relevant are some of these arguments when people are coming here by airplane in the ninth month of their pregnancy. A baby here becomes an instant citizen, and then they bring the entire family in from China or India or some other hellhole on the planet. You don’t have to go too far to see that. English is not spoken here anymore. That there’s almost no loyalty to this country amongst the immigrant class coming in today, which was not always the case. No, they’re not like the European Americans of today and their ancestors. The Irish integrated, the Italians integrated, the Polish integrated the Lithuanians, the Romanians, the Russians. They all integrated and became Americans in the melting pot. The idea of the melting pot is long over. It is now just a cash in pot. We’ve gone from the melting pot to the chamber pot. As I said many years ago, you don’t have to go any further than any city in America to see what this has wrought upon this country. So to listen to these very wise, smart lawyers arguing in the abstract as to whether birthright citizenship should apply to anyone born here, no matter who their parents are, where their parents came from, is ludicrous to me, which is why I put up a poll on my social channels where I said, birthright citizenship should be subjected to a national vote. Not put in the hands of lawyers."

Commentary Donald J. Trump Posts From Truth Social

97,726 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce