正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

When the ‘Forever Canadian’ petition launched, it was framed as a grassroots movement. But looking at who’s lining up behind it, that claim doesn’t hold. This isn’t a cultural moment - it’s an institutional one. When major organizations across the province mobilize in sync, and unions take on a... show more

Sheldon Yakiwchuk

32,857 subscribers

34,548 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

One of the most encouraging conversations I had in Red Deer was with the Alberta snowbirds from Yuma. These are Albertans who spend part of the winter in places like Arizona, and instead of checking out politically while they were away, they helped turn Yuma into one of the most unexpectedly inspiring little hubs of the independence movement. In this conversation, they explain that their Yuma team held six pop-up signing events, and at one of the bigger turnouts they saw roughly 350 people show up, with only a handful of canvassers trying to keep up. That is not a gimmick. That is real support showing up in the middle of another country because Albertans abroad still care deeply about what happens back home. That is why this matters. A lot of people saw the Yuma story as a funny social media moment. But it is actually much more than that. It is a sign that this movement has reached a level of mainstream visibility where ordinary Albertans are no longer waiting for permission, no longer hiding their support, and no longer treating independence as some fringe theory that only gets discussed in private. They are carrying it with them wherever they go. Arizona, Mexico, Hawaii, even farther afield. That tells you something important: this idea is alive in people now. It travels with them. It is becoming part of their identity. The Yuma team also makes another point that matters. They were not calling themselves heroes. They said they were just tough Albertans who were not going to put up with any more nonsense. That is exactly the spirit behind a lot of this movement. Not celebrity. Not performance. Not paid activism. Just regular Albertans deciding to do something real because they believe this can actually happen. And in the conversation I say exactly that: the reason so many people are out there, whether in Arizona heat or Alberta wind, is because we genuinely believe this can happen. That is a big part of why the Yuma story hit so hard online. It gave people a visible example of momentum. It showed that support is not confined to one town, one rally, or one demographic. It showed that even when Albertans are temporarily outside the province, they are still emotionally and politically invested enough to organize, collect signatures, and encourage others. That kind of behavior only happens when a movement starts to feel real. People do not go to that kind of effort for something they think is doomed. And yes, a few naysayers tried to mock it or imply there was something improper about collecting signatures outside Canada. But that criticism mostly reveals how weak and short-sighted the opposition is. An Albertan with Alberta identification is still an Albertan wherever he or she happens to be standing. There is nothing absurd about that. In fact, it would be absurd to suggest that Albertans somehow lose their political rights the moment they cross a border for a holiday. The mockery never really landed because it was rooted more in reflexive sneering than in serious thought. What the Yuma story really symbolizes is critical mass. When people start setting up pop-up canvassing events not just in Alberta but around the world, it means the movement is no longer surviving on theory alone. It means people feel momentum. It means they want to be part of it. It means they can picture success. And that encouragement matters, because political movements grow when ordinary people start seeing visible signs that victory is possible. That is why this was such an important little segment. It was not just about Yuma. It was about proof that Alberta independence is spreading, normalizing, and becoming something more and more people believe can actually be done.

One of the most encouraging conversations I had in Red Deer was with the Alberta snowbirds from Yuma. These are Albertans who spend part of the winter in places like Arizona, and instead of checking out politically while they were away, they helped turn Yuma into one of the most unexpectedly inspiring little hubs of the independence movement. In this conversation, they explain that their Yuma team held six pop-up signing events, and at one of the bigger turnouts they saw roughly 350 people show up, with only a handful of canvassers trying to keep up. That is not a gimmick. That is real support showing up in the middle of another country because Albertans abroad still care deeply about what happens back home. That is why this matters. A lot of people saw the Yuma story as a funny social media moment. But it is actually much more than that. It is a sign that this movement has reached a level of mainstream visibility where ordinary Albertans are no longer waiting for permission, no longer hiding their support, and no longer treating independence as some fringe theory that only gets discussed in private. They are carrying it with them wherever they go. Arizona, Mexico, Hawaii, even farther afield. That tells you something important: this idea is alive in people now. It travels with them. It is becoming part of their identity. The Yuma team also makes another point that matters. They were not calling themselves heroes. They said they were just tough Albertans who were not going to put up with any more nonsense. That is exactly the spirit behind a lot of this movement. Not celebrity. Not performance. Not paid activism. Just regular Albertans deciding to do something real because they believe this can actually happen. And in the conversation I say exactly that: the reason so many people are out there, whether in Arizona heat or Alberta wind, is because we genuinely believe this can happen. That is a big part of why the Yuma story hit so hard online. It gave people a visible example of momentum. It showed that support is not confined to one town, one rally, or one demographic. It showed that even when Albertans are temporarily outside the province, they are still emotionally and politically invested enough to organize, collect signatures, and encourage others. That kind of behavior only happens when a movement starts to feel real. People do not go to that kind of effort for something they think is doomed. And yes, a few naysayers tried to mock it or imply there was something improper about collecting signatures outside Canada. But that criticism mostly reveals how weak and short-sighted the opposition is. An Albertan with Alberta identification is still an Albertan wherever he or she happens to be standing. There is nothing absurd about that. In fact, it would be absurd to suggest that Albertans somehow lose their political rights the moment they cross a border for a holiday. The mockery never really landed because it was rooted more in reflexive sneering than in serious thought. What the Yuma story really symbolizes is critical mass. When people start setting up pop-up canvassing events not just in Alberta but around the world, it means the movement is no longer surviving on theory alone. It means people feel momentum. It means they want to be part of it. It means they can picture success. And that encouragement matters, because political movements grow when ordinary people start seeing visible signs that victory is possible. That is why this was such an important little segment. It was not just about Yuma. It was about proof that Alberta independence is spreading, normalizing, and becoming something more and more people believe can actually be done.

Jon Alberta Patriot

16,854 次观看 • 4 个月前

She needed the ER… and her husband said it was “inconvenient.” Let that sink in. She’s in pain, scared enough to call for help, and the one person who’s supposed to show up for her says it’s not worth the trouble. So she calls someone else. Not a stranger… but not her husband either. And in that moment, everything changes. Because you don’t forget who shows up when it matters, and who doesn’t. It’s never just about that one moment. It reveals everything about priorities, care, and what someone truly means to you. Is this something you could forgive… or is that the moment the relationship is over?

Sensitive content

She needed the ER… and her husband said it was “inconvenient.” Let that sink in. She’s in pain, scared enough to call for help, and the one person who’s supposed to show up for her says it’s not worth the trouble. So she calls someone else. Not a stranger… but not her husband either. And in that moment, everything changes. Because you don’t forget who shows up when it matters, and who doesn’t. It’s never just about that one moment. It reveals everything about priorities, care, and what someone truly means to you. Is this something you could forgive… or is that the moment the relationship is over?

Dr. CZ

54,870 次观看 • 4 个月前

A VISIT TO GWANDARA, ABUJA THE GRASSROOTS ARE READY Our visit to Gwandara in Abuja was more than a routine engagement it was a clear reminder that the true strength of any movement lies with the people. On the ground, among the grassroots, the message was unmistakable, it is that they are ready.

A VISIT TO GWANDARA, ABUJA THE GRASSROOTS ARE READY Our visit to Gwandara in Abuja was more than a routine engagement it was a clear reminder that the true strength of any movement lies with the people. On the ground, among the grassroots, the message was unmistakable, it is that they are ready.

Omoyele Sowore

17,527 次观看 • 4 个月前

Aaron Siri: The New York Times LIED about ICAN’s polio vaccine petition in a desperate attempt to “derail” RFK Jr.’s nomination for HHS. “The claim that the New York Times is making … is categorically FALSE. They knew it was false when they published it. They intended the country to be misled, and that’s what they accomplished. All of this is intended for one purpose: they’re desperately trying to derail Mr. Kennedy’s potential confirmation. The outrage here should not be about what The New York Times is saying. The outrage here should be that the FDA licensed a product for injection into children based on a clinical trial that only reviewed safety for three days after injection. That’s where the outrage should be. That should have been The New York Times headline. Most drugs are licensee based on multi-year placebo-controlled trials. Don’t take my word for it. Go to the FDA website, take a look yourself. It’s not my petition. I have a client, ICAN, and it’ll be their choice whether they want to leave the petition in place. I can tell you this: ICAN did not file that petition in order to get the FDA to actually withdraw the vaccine … they just want the FDA to require proper data. This is about choice. It’s about informed consent.”

Aaron Siri: The New York Times LIED about ICAN’s polio vaccine petition in a desperate attempt to “derail” RFK Jr.’s nomination for HHS. “The claim that the New York Times is making … is categorically FALSE. They knew it was false when they published it. They intended the country to be misled, and that’s what they accomplished. All of this is intended for one purpose: they’re desperately trying to derail Mr. Kennedy’s potential confirmation. The outrage here should not be about what The New York Times is saying. The outrage here should be that the FDA licensed a product for injection into children based on a clinical trial that only reviewed safety for three days after injection. That’s where the outrage should be. That should have been The New York Times headline. Most drugs are licensee based on multi-year placebo-controlled trials. Don’t take my word for it. Go to the FDA website, take a look yourself. It’s not my petition. I have a client, ICAN, and it’ll be their choice whether they want to leave the petition in place. I can tell you this: ICAN did not file that petition in order to get the FDA to actually withdraw the vaccine … they just want the FDA to require proper data. This is about choice. It’s about informed consent.”

MAHA PAC🗽

37,912 次观看 • 1 年前

American Hamburger meat contains up to 10% of a “red slush” that doesn’t have to be included on the labels “All the big stores do it” “They have something, we call it the red Slurpee or Slush. When they have big packing plants to remove the meat from the cartilage and everything, they put it in an ammonia bath. And what happens is all that floats the top, they dry and palletize it. And legally, you can take that and add up to 10% to hamburger. You don't have to put it on the label. It's considered food. So you can have hamburger, buy that stuff for a dollar a pound, add it to it, and all the big stores do it. You can add that to it. And now all of a sudden, you're. You're selling a hamburger that's really only 90%, and you're putting this fill in it. And there's several studies showing for a brief moment that when your stomach acids break that down, it opens your body up for cancer cells.”

American Hamburger meat contains up to 10% of a “red slush” that doesn’t have to be included on the labels “All the big stores do it” “They have something, we call it the red Slurpee or Slush. When they have big packing plants to remove the meat from the cartilage and everything, they put it in an ammonia bath. And what happens is all that floats the top, they dry and palletize it. And legally, you can take that and add up to 10% to hamburger. You don't have to put it on the label. It's considered food. So you can have hamburger, buy that stuff for a dollar a pound, add it to it, and all the big stores do it. You can add that to it. And now all of a sudden, you're. You're selling a hamburger that's really only 90%, and you're putting this fill in it. And there's several studies showing for a brief moment that when your stomach acids break that down, it opens your body up for cancer cells.”

Wall Street Apes

295,416 次观看 • 1 年前

Caine: There's a lot in that question. I'd love to take that offline and answer it, but it was I'm struggling to find exactly what your question was. And that's probably me, not you. Hegseth: It was an indictment framed as a question.

Caine: There's a lot in that question. I'd love to take that offline and answer it, but it was I'm struggling to find exactly what your question was. And that's probably me, not you. Hegseth: It was an indictment framed as a question.

Acyn

115,344 次观看 • 4 个月前

Amber Rose doubles down on Trump’s [false] claim that Haitians are eating pets in Ohio "That is not racist when something is true and people are saying it online… It is a known fact that in the Haitian culture, that’s what they do” 🔗:

Amber Rose doubles down on Trump’s [false] claim that Haitians are eating pets in Ohio "That is not racist when something is true and people are saying it online… It is a known fact that in the Haitian culture, that’s what they do” 🔗:

Block Topickz

4,329,466 次观看 • 1 年前

Cheryl Reeve on the trans sports bans from her perspective of being a leader in women’s sports “Of course it weighs on me, the attacks on trans people, the attacks that they’ve gone through… it seems like it’s got way more aggressive, it’s sort of sickening when the issues they are trying to tackle are really not issues, the number of transgender athletes they are now making laws for and creating a problem, to get elected…what I’m hopeful for is that people have gotten themselves more educated and they understand that, that’s not actually a problem… exclusion is never the answer, separate isn’t equal, and trans lives matter, so to take away something that’s so valuable that sports brings to young people in particular and what it does, as I have a youngster, encourages you to be part of a team and what it gives you in terms of teamwork, leadership, competitiveness, all the things, they have every right to that as well”

Cheryl Reeve on the trans sports bans from her perspective of being a leader in women’s sports “Of course it weighs on me, the attacks on trans people, the attacks that they’ve gone through… it seems like it’s got way more aggressive, it’s sort of sickening when the issues they are trying to tackle are really not issues, the number of transgender athletes they are now making laws for and creating a problem, to get elected…what I’m hopeful for is that people have gotten themselves more educated and they understand that, that’s not actually a problem… exclusion is never the answer, separate isn’t equal, and trans lives matter, so to take away something that’s so valuable that sports brings to young people in particular and what it does, as I have a youngster, encourages you to be part of a team and what it gives you in terms of teamwork, leadership, competitiveness, all the things, they have every right to that as well”

Andrew Dukowitz

1,436,872 次观看 • 1 个月前

This woman called for an Uber so that she could go and visit her friend, when the Uber showed up, it wasn’t the one in the picture on the app, but it can’t be a coincidence that it was this one that showed up. A moment before it showed up, a man walked by, and seemed to circle her, once the fake Uber showed up, the man who circled her tried to force her into the car, she managed to fight them off and got away. Could the actual Uber that she was assigned to in the app have been involved in this, how else would could this have happened?

This woman called for an Uber so that she could go and visit her friend, when the Uber showed up, it wasn’t the one in the picture on the app, but it can’t be a coincidence that it was this one that showed up. A moment before it showed up, a man walked by, and seemed to circle her, once the fake Uber showed up, the man who circled her tried to force her into the car, she managed to fight them off and got away. Could the actual Uber that she was assigned to in the app have been involved in this, how else would could this have happened?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

1,003,246 次观看 • 7 个月前

PabloReports: What do you make of this double standard that’s been emerging as to how Republicans don’t deal with the creeps and some of the people who have been committing sexual misconduct and abuse in their ranks… Murphy: This is just a double standard that is endemic to sort of everything Republicans are doing today. They have a double standard for corruption. They don’t care about it when it happens in their ranks. And when there’s a whiff of it on the Democratic side, they’re all over it. Obviously, I hope that doesn’t exist when it comes to this ethics report that’s emerged in the House.

PabloReports: What do you make of this double standard that’s been emerging as to how Republicans don’t deal with the creeps and some of the people who have been committing sexual misconduct and abuse in their ranks… Murphy: This is just a double standard that is endemic to sort of everything Republicans are doing today. They have a double standard for corruption. They don’t care about it when it happens in their ranks. And when there’s a whiff of it on the Democratic side, they’re all over it. Obviously, I hope that doesn’t exist when it comes to this ethics report that’s emerged in the House.

Acyn

23,214 次观看 • 22 天前

This is so good. “Take courage.” Take courage. Now, that seems like kind of a weak response, doesn’t it? Maybe some kind of a pep talk. You probably have had people tell you in the midst of your worst fears, and anxieties, and disappointments, and distress, and trouble – and somebody says, “Take courage.” And sometimes you want to whack them, as if they don’t even understand the depth of your problem with such a superficial answer. What do you mean? It’s a lot more complicated than that. Buck up, buddy, you know? That’s not going to work. And there’s a reason that’s not going to work when you say it: because you have absolutely no power over the circumstances, right? It’s a nice gesture. Cheer up. But you have no power over the circumstances. But there is one who does. When Jesus says, “Take courage,” that’s a different issue. There’s quite a remarkable use of the word here. It’s one word. “Take courage,” or cheer up, is one word: tharseite. One word in the Greek. It’s a verb form, and it’s in the imperative. It’s a command. Okay? Listen to this. Every time that word is used, and it’s used many times in the gospels and the New Testament – every time that word is used in the New Testament, it is in the imperative. It is a command. Cheer up. Take courage. Now, listen to this. Every time it is used in the New Testament, it is spoken by Jesus. No one else ever says that in the New Testament. That is a whole different issue. If the Lord Jesus, who is in control of absolutely everything, says, “Cheer up,” that’s different. That’s completely different. This is not just a well-intentioned pep talk. On the other hand, this is an absolutely divine promise. The disciples are distressed, to put it mildly. They’re afflicted. They’re pressured. They don’t know how they’re going to survive without Christ. He’s all they’ve known for three years. And our Lord says to them: “Cheer up. I’m going to tell you three things that should bring you joy. One, you are loved by God. Two, you are in God’s everlasting care. Three, God has a promise for your future.” You have love you have faith, and you have hope. You are loved by God. You believe in God. You hope in God. That’s all you need – to be loved by God, to be entrusted into God’s eternal care, and to have Him promise you a glorious future is all you need. — John MacArthur

This is so good. “Take courage.” Take courage. Now, that seems like kind of a weak response, doesn’t it? Maybe some kind of a pep talk. You probably have had people tell you in the midst of your worst fears, and anxieties, and disappointments, and distress, and trouble – and somebody says, “Take courage.” And sometimes you want to whack them, as if they don’t even understand the depth of your problem with such a superficial answer. What do you mean? It’s a lot more complicated than that. Buck up, buddy, you know? That’s not going to work. And there’s a reason that’s not going to work when you say it: because you have absolutely no power over the circumstances, right? It’s a nice gesture. Cheer up. But you have no power over the circumstances. But there is one who does. When Jesus says, “Take courage,” that’s a different issue. There’s quite a remarkable use of the word here. It’s one word. “Take courage,” or cheer up, is one word: tharseite. One word in the Greek. It’s a verb form, and it’s in the imperative. It’s a command. Okay? Listen to this. Every time that word is used, and it’s used many times in the gospels and the New Testament – every time that word is used in the New Testament, it is in the imperative. It is a command. Cheer up. Take courage. Now, listen to this. Every time it is used in the New Testament, it is spoken by Jesus. No one else ever says that in the New Testament. That is a whole different issue. If the Lord Jesus, who is in control of absolutely everything, says, “Cheer up,” that’s different. That’s completely different. This is not just a well-intentioned pep talk. On the other hand, this is an absolutely divine promise. The disciples are distressed, to put it mildly. They’re afflicted. They’re pressured. They don’t know how they’re going to survive without Christ. He’s all they’ve known for three years. And our Lord says to them: “Cheer up. I’m going to tell you three things that should bring you joy. One, you are loved by God. Two, you are in God’s everlasting care. Three, God has a promise for your future.” You have love you have faith, and you have hope. You are loved by God. You believe in God. You hope in God. That’s all you need – to be loved by God, to be entrusted into God’s eternal care, and to have Him promise you a glorious future is all you need. — John MacArthur

Terri Green

10,413 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 “YOU WERE LIED TO” Millions didn’t take the vaccine out of fear for themselves. They took it to “protect others.” To protect parents. Grandparents. The vulnerable. That was the message. Repeated relentlessly. “Stop the spread.” “Protect your loved ones.” “Do your part.” But now? Voices are emerging saying that claim was never properly proven — and may never have been true in the way it was presented. If that’s the case, then this isn’t a misunderstanding. It’s a breach of trust on a global scale. Because people didn’t just make a medical decision — they made a moral one. And they made it based on what they were told. The real question now isn’t just what happened… It’s why people were so certain when the evidence wasn’t.

🚨 “YOU WERE LIED TO” Millions didn’t take the vaccine out of fear for themselves. They took it to “protect others.” To protect parents. Grandparents. The vulnerable. That was the message. Repeated relentlessly. “Stop the spread.” “Protect your loved ones.” “Do your part.” But now? Voices are emerging saying that claim was never properly proven — and may never have been true in the way it was presented. If that’s the case, then this isn’t a misunderstanding. It’s a breach of trust on a global scale. Because people didn’t just make a medical decision — they made a moral one. And they made it based on what they were told. The real question now isn’t just what happened… It’s why people were so certain when the evidence wasn’t.

Jim Ferguson

22,972 次观看 • 4 个月前

The censors objected to this kissing (sex) scene in 'The Big Combo' (1955) stating that “This filth of showing a guy going down on a woman is not for the American audience.” Joseph H Lewis hit back at them saying that the scene was open left to interpretation and they were the one filthy for imagining that. After that, the Censors allowed that scene to appear in the movie. Here is Joseph H. Lewis explaining the incident: "They called me into the projection room and I asked them what they objected to, and one guy very crudely came out and said, “This filth of showing a guy going down on a woman is not for the American audience.” And I said, “You’re the one that’s filthy. This wasn’t my intention at all—I left it to your imagination. If you want to imagine this, that’s up to you. But you never saw him kiss that girl below her neck and—” He says, “Well, what was the intent?” I said, “You supply me with the emotion: that’s why I left it to the audience. But don’t tell me I’m filthy, or a filthy director.” And they left it in, of course. They had no basis." ('Who the devil made it', Peter Bogdanovich, 1997)

Sensitive content

The censors objected to this kissing (sex) scene in 'The Big Combo' (1955) stating that “This filth of showing a guy going down on a woman is not for the American audience.” Joseph H Lewis hit back at them saying that the scene was open left to interpretation and they were the one filthy for imagining that. After that, the Censors allowed that scene to appear in the movie. Here is Joseph H. Lewis explaining the incident: "They called me into the projection room and I asked them what they objected to, and one guy very crudely came out and said, “This filth of showing a guy going down on a woman is not for the American audience.” And I said, “You’re the one that’s filthy. This wasn’t my intention at all—I left it to your imagination. If you want to imagine this, that’s up to you. But you never saw him kiss that girl below her neck and—” He says, “Well, what was the intent?” I said, “You supply me with the emotion: that’s why I left it to the audience. But don’t tell me I’m filthy, or a filthy director.” And they left it in, of course. They had no basis." ('Who the devil made it', Peter Bogdanovich, 1997)

DepressedBergman

70,276 次观看 • 6 个月前

Empty Netters responded to the claims regarding #HeatedRivalry. Said it was a private conversation on December 2nd before they seen the show. Said that the way it’s framed made it look like they pretended to love it in their review but hated it in private and that’s not true.

Empty Netters responded to the claims regarding #HeatedRivalry. Said it was a private conversation on December 2nd before they seen the show. Said that the way it’s framed made it look like they pretended to love it in their review but hated it in private and that’s not true.

˚₊‧꒰ა 𓂋 ໒꒱ ‧₊˚

758,735 次观看 • 7 个月前

The petition is going crazy.. Let me know what it was at when you signed it! Even if they don’t call a general election. It sends clear message to the government and to each other that they and their policies are despised !! Sign it and share it!!

The petition is going crazy.. Let me know what it was at when you signed it! Even if they don’t call a general election. It sends clear message to the government and to each other that they and their policies are despised !! Sign it and share it!!

leilani dowding 🌸🚜 ☮️

375,302 次观看 • 1 年前

Hasan shows off the Kaya collar, says it’s for vibration “This is one that they saw..it has the capacity to vibrate and that’s it..are you happy..it also has a flashlight component and tracker..this doesn’t work in the way you think it does”

Hasan shows off the Kaya collar, says it’s for vibration “This is one that they saw..it has the capacity to vibrate and that’s it..are you happy..it also has a flashlight component and tracker..this doesn’t work in the way you think it does”

yeet

6,730,716 次观看 • 10 个月前

Mamdani: I think people voted with their pockets in mind. They wanted to see if they could actually afford the things they could afford four years prior. But instead, what they’re seeing is that Donald Trump is focused on his own pockets. That’s the kind of politics on offer in this moment. And it’s gotten to the point where we have active-duty military families lining up at food pantries across this country. At a time when so many Americans are crying out for any kind of politics that actually helps the working class in this country, they’re not finding it in Donald Trump.

Mamdani: I think people voted with their pockets in mind. They wanted to see if they could actually afford the things they could afford four years prior. But instead, what they’re seeing is that Donald Trump is focused on his own pockets. That’s the kind of politics on offer in this moment. And it’s gotten to the point where we have active-duty military families lining up at food pantries across this country. At a time when so many Americans are crying out for any kind of politics that actually helps the working class in this country, they’re not finding it in Donald Trump.

Acyn

98,819 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨President Trump announced that there might be a high-level meeting with Zelenskyy as early as this weekend, but didn’t specify if he would participate, and once again reiterated that UA should hold elections right now (note: it’s against the constitution to hold elections during the martial law, also it’s simply not safe, and UA society is widely opposed to the idea). TRUMP: “They would like us to go to a meeting over the weekend, in Europe, and we’ll make a determination depending on what they come back with. We don’t wanna be wasting time. Sometimes you have to let people fight it out, and sometimes you don’t. But the problem with letting people fight it out is you’re losing thousands of people a week. It’s ridiculous. The whole thing is ridiculous.” Q: “And when you say that the European leaders want to have a meeting over the weekend, are you talking about with Zelenskyy or with them?” TRUMP: “With Zelenskyy and us.” Q: “And you said in an interview yesterday that you think it’s time for Zelenskyy to start accepting things. What things are you talking about?” TRUMP: “Well, I think he has to be realistic. And I do wonder about how long is it gonna be till they have an election. You know, for a democracy, it’s a long time. They haven’t had an election in a long time. There was a poll that came out, 82% of the people are demanding a settlement be made, Ukrainian people. They wanna see a settlement be made. I understand that. They’re losing thousands and thousands of people a week. They wanna see it ended. And I do say at what point, when do they have an election in Ukraine? That’s not casting aspersions on anybody, but they do have a massive corruption situation going on there… People are asking this question, ‘When do they have an election?’ Are they gonna have an election, or are they gonna just keep it going like this? So, I think it’s time to get that war settled, and I think it’s a war that can be settled. But it takes two to tango.”

🚨President Trump announced that there might be a high-level meeting with Zelenskyy as early as this weekend, but didn’t specify if he would participate, and once again reiterated that UA should hold elections right now (note: it’s against the constitution to hold elections during the martial law, also it’s simply not safe, and UA society is widely opposed to the idea). TRUMP: “They would like us to go to a meeting over the weekend, in Europe, and we’ll make a determination depending on what they come back with. We don’t wanna be wasting time. Sometimes you have to let people fight it out, and sometimes you don’t. But the problem with letting people fight it out is you’re losing thousands of people a week. It’s ridiculous. The whole thing is ridiculous.” Q: “And when you say that the European leaders want to have a meeting over the weekend, are you talking about with Zelenskyy or with them?” TRUMP: “With Zelenskyy and us.” Q: “And you said in an interview yesterday that you think it’s time for Zelenskyy to start accepting things. What things are you talking about?” TRUMP: “Well, I think he has to be realistic. And I do wonder about how long is it gonna be till they have an election. You know, for a democracy, it’s a long time. They haven’t had an election in a long time. There was a poll that came out, 82% of the people are demanding a settlement be made, Ukrainian people. They wanna see a settlement be made. I understand that. They’re losing thousands and thousands of people a week. They wanna see it ended. And I do say at what point, when do they have an election in Ukraine? That’s not casting aspersions on anybody, but they do have a massive corruption situation going on there… People are asking this question, ‘When do they have an election?’ Are they gonna have an election, or are they gonna just keep it going like this? So, I think it’s time to get that war settled, and I think it’s a war that can be settled. But it takes two to tango.”

Kateryna Lisunova

10,801 次观看 • 8 个月前