Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

When the Scots & Welsh wave their flags it's called progressive nationalism. When the English wave the St. George's Cross it's deemed "racist" The English have every reason to celebrate their national identity Indeed, only the land we today call Italy can rival the achievements of England* in making...

38,628 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

"I am English" 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Who are the English? This has recently been reported by the BBC as a ' deeply contentious debate', as if there is nowhere the people of England can tie themselves to, that we have no land of our own, or that we are not a race or indigenous people. Who are the English? The English are the native ethnic group of England and the largest ethnic group in the United Kingdom. We share a common history, language (English), culture, and identity, developed over 1000s of years. The English are a fusion of Celts, Britons, Anglo-Saxons, with some Romano and Norse influence. Modern genetic studies show the English as a mix: Anglo-Saxon/continental northern European (Angles & Saxons) who dominate the East, Central and Northern regions of England, and the indigenous Briton/Celtic populations (pre-Anglo-Saxon) who dominate the South and West of England. The name England means, 'Land of the Angles'. What is in a name? The etymology of my surname 'Denslow' originates from the words, 'Denu' meaning the valleys of South West England, and 'Sloh' meaning marsh, swamp or bog, so my surname translates to, man from the marshes of the valleys of South West England, and is over 1500 years old. I am literally a swamp creature. Are you English, what does your surname mean and which part of England does it originate from? Please let me know in the comments, I would love to hear from you. "I am English" The World Is Ours, not theirs.

Darren of Plymouth

19,107 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Jacob Rees-Mogg is wrong — and he is wrong on the one subject he claims as his own: the constitution. England is not a synonym for Britain. Britain is a political union. England is a country that existed for centuries before that union, with its own law, its own church, its own parliament, its own people, and its own name. The Acts of Union did not abolish the English nation. They bound kingdoms together. A British passport makes you a subject of the Crown and a citizen of the United Kingdom. It does not, by itself, make you English — any more than it makes a Scot English, a Welshman English, or an Ulsterman English. If those distinctions were meaningless, devolution would be meaningless, the national football teams would be meaningless, and the word “England” on every statute, charter and battlefield before 1707 would be a clerical error. Rees-Mogg’s claim that the newest passport-holder is “as English as I am” collapses two different things into one: legal status and belonging to a people. The constitution recognises the first. It has never pretended the second is created at the counter of a passport office. Englishness is a historic nation, not a filing code. Nations are made of descent, language, custom, memory and time. They are not issued. That is why ancestry is not an optional extra. You do not become English by declaration any more than you become the heir of a house by walking through the front door. Four generations on this soil, of English stock, raised in English life, is the least that has ever been a serious test of whether a family has joined the people rather than merely entered the jurisdiction. Anything less is hospitality, residence, or citizenship. Those can be honourable. They are not the same thing. Rees-Mogg knows this in his bones even as he denies it with his mouth. He talks of Somerset centuries, of Crécy, of Magna Carta, of Fortescue and the king under the law — all of it English inheritance, not a bureaucratic abstraction called “British/English.” Then he tells you the inheritance does not matter. That is not constitutional tradition. That is a political convenience dressed up as history. So let us be precise. British is the state. English is the nation. Confusing the two is how a country forgets itself. The rebuttal starts there.

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Graham Moore 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

54,755 просмотров • 7 дней назад