Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
When there is a Chemistry, it makes a difference, Agree?🤤 Connection NastyTwinks Official Caleb Anderson @CalebAndersonXX🔥Jordan Haze By David Cruz 🔗 #Bareback #Twinks #CuteBoys #CuteGuys #CuteGays #GayKissing #GayRomance #GayCouple #GayStoryline #Boyfriends
402,603 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 0
Нет доступных комментариев
Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста
Похожие видео
![Gabor Maté on emotional suppression: Your anger didn't disappear. You just learned to hide it even from yourself. Gabor Maté, one of the world's leading voices on trauma and the mind-body connection, has spent decades studying why people get sick. His answer is often not what people expect. It isn't just stress. It isn't just genetics. A major culprit, Maté argues, is something most of us were trained to do before we could even name it: suppressing our own emotions to stay connected to the people we love. He starts with a simple observation about what anger actually is: "When you're angry it's not just an emotional state in your head. Your whole body is now [in that state]." Anger is a full-body event. Energy surges through the nervous system. It wants to move. Now imagine the cost of stopping it before it even surfaces. The deal children are forced to make Maté points to a specific, critical moment in early childhood: when a child's natural anger meets a parent's disapproval. He references Jordan Peterson's parenting advice that an angry child should be separated from the family until they return to "normal" as an example of a message many children receive in various forms: "If you're angry you will not be accepted by us. In fact you'll be excluded… until you come back to quote unquote normal." For a young child, that is not a minor social correction. That is an existential threat. Attachment to a caregiver is survival. So the child makes the only logical trade available to them: "They give up their authenticity for the sake of the attachment." The anger doesn't go anywhere. It just gets pushed underground. So deep, eventually, that the person no longer feels it at all. The body keeps the cost Repressing an emotion, especially one as physiologically charged as anger is not a passive act. It takes constant, active effort from the nervous system and the immune system. "That emotional, physiological effort of repressing anger takes a toll on the nervous system and on the immune system. It's a major role in disease." The body is not fooled by the mind's decision not to feel. The energy has to go somewhere. And over years and over decades that somewhere is tissue, organs, inflammation. Maté isn't arguing that children should be allowed to rage unchecked, or that parents who enforce boundaries are doing harm. He's pointing at something more subtle: the difference between helping a child process difficult emotions and teaching them to disappear those emotions entirely. One builds emotional capacity. The other trades it away quietly, early, at a price that often doesn't come due until decades later. And the person paying rarely connects the bill to the original transaction.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2045117680353698201/amplify_video_thumb/2045117627635531777/img/0pKBSv5Ot3-c6hTf.jpg)
1:40
Sensitive content
This video is spot on. White Women don't like seeing weakness in White Men. We prefer Masculinity, not the FAKE "Masculinity" where incels think it's about controlling their Woman and belittling her, putting her down and saying she should do as she is told and make them a sandwich in a rude disgusting way etc The TRUE Masculinity is a White Man who Respects and appreciates his wife and shows her strength by supporting her especially when she becomes a Mother and is pregnant, the Masculine Man would come back from work and instantly do things that the wife would normally do for him and just makes sure the house is clean and the cooking is done etc When the wife is pregnant and ProCreating your baby, (the next White Generations), the husband should be looking after her and doing everything that she does for him everyday because I'm telling you now, I'm nearly 37 weeks pregnant and it's a fucking struggle bending up and down all the time, especially when I have lightning crotch pains, it's difficult to walk never mind doing housework and the cooking. Masculinity isn't just about the physical strength of a Man, it's about character and being there for your White Wife and your White Children and doing whatever it takes to Protect them, keeping them all safe with a roof over their heads and keeping them all happy 🥹 That is the difference between the jew-incel made up "Masculinity" to the REAL Aryan European Masculinity 🔥
MAKE EUROPA SNOW 🤍❄️🧬
16,382 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад
![👽🔥🔥Four Takeaways 🔥🔥👽 "This is coming out no matter what. And when it does, if [the folks keeping it secret] are not a part of it, this is going to be a lot worse than it already is." "I have direct, firsthand knowledge and exposure to crash recovery, reverse engineering, integration of technology into [redacted] as well as the most important piece of technology on the planet. And it's not the craft themselves." Brake lines were cut. "Not only do I have (direct knowledge of UAP being actual craft of unknown or non-human origin), I testified to it. I provided materials proving it. And it was proven to me that what I provided was, in fact, true." I testified to the, "Senate staff, House staff, AARO, and the ICIG. Under oath. FBI was there. The DoD was there at points in time, staff members from Armed Services, Intelligence..." ~~~ George Knapp: "There's a line you don't want to cross because of legal ramifications? Or because you promised you wouldn't? Dylan Borland: "Both, and I still believe in national security, which is why I'm here. It's why I went through the whistleblower process. It's why I'm so upset that so many whistleblowers have been let down. It's why I'm upset that laws are not being followed. It's why I'm upset that SEC whistleblower payments, which is 10% to anybody who comes forward with any information of financial abuse and wrong ship, should receive that. There's a number of reasons. But ultimately, I believe in the Constitution of the United States." (NOTE: "The SEC's whistleblower program was established by Congress to incentivize whistleblowers to report specific, timely and credible information about possible federal securities laws violations. "The Commission is authorized to provide monetary awards to eligible individuals who come forward with high-quality original information that leads to an SEC enforcement action in which over $1 million in sanctions is ordered. The range for awards is between 10% and 30% of the money collected." Source: Has anybody been sanctioned or money collected as it related to this? If not, how can a whistleblower receive an award?) ~~ Knapp: "Yeah, in a sense, you are a patriot. Of course, you love your country. But you are a patriot in a sense that there's a limit to it, and when people violate the Constitution or go against the law or treat people who are living up to their oaths, poorly, threatening them, intimidating, then it has to come out." Borland: "Yeah, it's infuriating. There's a difference between being disgruntled and me being disgruntled and maybe releasing everything: names, locations, places, crimes that were committed, sexual assaults I'm aware of, stalking I'm aware of, brake lines being cut. It would be me releasing all of that, and I'm not doing that." (Is all of that related to UAP programs? I hope all of that is being investigated, based on the information Borland shared and other information the investigatory bodies have collected.) Borland: "I am doing that because this needs to be told. The people that are in these programs and the decision makers at Congress and the executive branch owe it to the American people, to the whistleblowers, to the veterans, to the service members, to tell the truth in the capacity they can, because this is coming out no matter what. And when it does, if they are not a part of it, this is going to be a lot worse than it already is." Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "So you have direct knowledge of UAP being actual craft of unknown or non-human origin, from your official capacity of work? You have some direct knowledge of that?" Borland: "100%. Not only do I have it, I testified to it. I provided materials proving it. And it was proven to me that what I provided was, in fact, true." Corbell: "Who did you testify to? List them out." Borland: "Senate, staff, House staff, AARO, and the ICIG." Knapp: "Under oath." Borland: "Under oath. FBI was there, the ICIG was there, the DoD was there at points in time, staff members from Armed Services, Intelligence. Basically, I went through the whole kit and caboodle to tell the truth and get this on record, because I have grave concerns for what is happening to people." Knapp: "Is there something else in between that thing that you saw, that went (makes a noise with his mouth), other experiences, things that you saw, either as a citizen or while working for the government, that you want to share with us?" Borland: "There are many. I think, as of this time, what I will say is this: I have direct, firsthand knowledge and exposure to crash recovery, reverse engineering, integration of technology into [redacted] as well as the most important piece of technology on the planet. And it's not the craft themselves." Corbell: "It would be the power source . Borland: "You can make that assessment yourself." Corbell: "I just did."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1970981106041356515/amplify_video_thumb/1970973769280946176/img/C0BOsbzI3OtXF_3B.jpg)
![This is an incredibly damning piece of historical evidence: This is Davyd Arakhamia, parliamentary leader of Zelensky's ''Servant of the People'' party. He led the Ukrainian delegation at peace talks with the Russians in Belarus and Türkiye in 2022, a few weeks into the war. Here’s what he says: - He confirms that Russia’s principal goal for the war wasn’t to invade the whole of Ukraine but to force Ukraine to become a neutral country that would not be part of NATO: “[Russia] really hoped almost to the last moment that they would force us to sign such an agreement so that we would take neutrality. It was the most important thing for them. They were prepared to end the war if we agreed to, – as Finland once did, – neutrality, and committed that we would not join NATO. In fact, this was the key point. Everything else was simply rhetoric and political ‘seasoning’ about denazification, the Russian-speaking population and blah-blah-blah." - When asked why Ukraine did not agree to this, here’s what he says: “First, in order to agree to this point, it is necessary to change the Constitution. Our path to NATO is written in the Constitution. Secondly, there was no confidence in the Russians that they would do it. This could only be done if there were security guarantees. We could not sign something, step away, everyone would relax there, and then they would [invade] even more prepared – because they had, in fact, gone in unprepared for such a resistance. Therefore, we could only explore this route when there is absolute certainty that this will not happen again. There is no such certainty. Moreover, when we returned from Istanbul, Boris Johnson came to Kyiv and said that we would not sign anything with them at all, and let's just fight.” He’s actually not being very forthright about the “no confidence in the Russians so this could only be done if there were security guarantees” claim, because from the media reports at the time in early 2022, this aspect of the deal was getting concretized. It’s even still up on Ukraine’s official presidency website: The concept was that permanent members of the UN Security Council would be the guarantors of the deal, alongside Turkey, Germany, Canada, Italy, Poland and Israel. The issue seems to have been that those security guarantees were “greeted with skepticism” by “Western officials”, as highlighted in this WSJ piece from back then: So this, combined with Arakhamia’s confirmation that what really killed the deal was “Boris Johnson [coming] to Kyiv and [saying] that we would not sign anything with them at all, and let's just fight” shows that it is unequivocally the West that killed the peace deal. Which confirms the extremely damning responsibility of the West in this war because we’re at a stage, 20 months later, when not only has Ukraine lost a horrifying amount of men (likely hundreds of thousands of deaths) but they couldn’t dream of getting such favorable conditions in a peace deal that the West is NOW pressuring them to make. And I won’t even get into the responsibility of the West in triggering this conflict in the first place with the expansion of NATO and the transformation of Ukraine into a Western bulwark on Russia’s border… Will there be any reckoning? Any admission of this responsibility? Any accountability? Any change, any rethinking in order to avoid such catastrophic failures in the future? Sadly I don’t even see the first inkling of the beginning of this, especially in Europe. And this is what makes me most depressed: it shows we're institutionally set in our erroneous ways with no capability to learn, adapt and change.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1728288101725089908/amplify_video_thumb/1728167311784214528/img/_Uz_0dyL_oT8TFHb.jpg)
