Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

When Welcher can do actual accident reconstructions, why did he present paint by numbers kinda reconstruction?

70,073 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

MsPhinPhan 🐬🏈's profile picture
MsPhinPhan 🐬🏈1 year ago

Sorry did he just say “most common area of injury” in a pedestrian accident is below the hips? Bc he testified to something totally opposite to that today.

SayWhat's profile picture
SayWhat1 year ago

Sure did.

Maxx Compensation Personal Injury Law Firm's profile picture
Maxx Compensation Personal Injury Law Firm1 year ago

Have you been in an accident? We can help!

Marbury v. Mad's profile picture
Marbury v. Mad1 year ago

I NEED this to be introduced on cross.

SayWhat's profile picture
SayWhat1 year ago

I’m assuming the lawyers have seen this, but not sure. Took a bit of research to find.

🇺🇸xrp-Jason jude's profile picture
🇺🇸xrp-Jason jude1 year ago

Bc it didn’t support the facts! He made a scenario that would fit the commonwealths narrative rather than figure out what happened!

Weeble Wobbles's profile picture
Weeble Wobbles1 year ago

Aperture brags on their website that they opened the Aperture Research and Testing “ART” facility. They do all sorts of testing there they claim. Except for the most watched trial in the country, possibly the world.

pickyBee🤦‍♂️'s profile picture
pickyBee🤦‍♂️1 year ago

Because he worked backwards on this particular case, it was obvious.

Kim Tuter's profile picture
Kim Tuter1 year ago

Because he didn’t want to damage the Lexus he bought on the CW’s dime. He absolutely “has a Lexus in this fight”

Edin's profile picture
Edin1 year ago

He probably did, but the results weren't useful to what the commonwealth wanted.

MsPhinPhan 🐬🏈's profile picture
MsPhinPhan 🐬🏈1 year ago

@BostonDefender @bobalessi Dr Welcher stated in this video he KNOWS the main injury point is the lower extremities.

Related Videos