Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

When you search for PrimeWater, its mostly posts from its customers. Walang tubig, nag-aabang hanggang madaling araw para makapag-ipon, sobrang mahal na bill pero pulpol na service. Manuel owns this company, entered into a lot of venture agreements when Mark was DPWH chief.

32,358 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

6 Kommentare

Profilbild von potato
potatovor 1 Jahr

A reminder that her family owns a water service company that has failed so many families all over the PH for years. Imagine, walang kang tubig, mahal pa. Gatasan lang ang turing sayo. If she can't deliver basic water, she has no business running for office. Kapal ng mukha no?

Profilbild von potato
potatovor 1 Jahr

Saw a post na sa San Jose Del Monte, Bulacan, kalahating buwan na silang walag tubig. That Camille Villar has the audacity to brand herself as someone who will champion people eh hindi nga kayo mabigyan ng supply ng tubig ng pamilya niya???

Profilbild von gigi ☕︎
gigi ☕︎vor 1 Jahr

Girl, same here in the province. Ever since PW took over the local water district, the service has gone downhill. Walang tubig pag morning. At kelangan pang mag-ipon balde-balde para lang may magamit. May times din na buong araw talaga, wala. Sobrang laking abala.

Profilbild von Ruul
Ruulvor 1 Jahr

Freelancing just got simpler—Ruul handles it all, from invoicing to payment collection. Create your first invoice today and #StartRuuling!

Profilbild von Herrera S
Herrera Svor 1 Jahr

Access to safe, sufficient, affordable water is a human right.

Profilbild von Lyza (taylor's version)
Lyza (taylor's version)vor 1 Jahr

Very trueee yan mga mimaaa! Dito samin halos 3 years na kaming tuwing madaling araw lang may tubig around 1am to 4am. so need talaga mag puyat para maka ipon ng tubig na gagamitin sa maghapon. 😭😭 Super pasakit at abala ang dala ng prime water dito samin sa dasmarinas.

Ähnliche Videos

‘DAO MING SI-NYOR’ SA F4 CONCERT! 🥰 Senior citizen fans of the iconic F4 from “Meteor Garden” received loud cheers from the crowd! Uploader GB Jeshireen Santos captured the adorable moment as titas and mommies waved to the crowd while ascending the stairs of the Philippine Arena for the “F4 FOREVER” 1st World Tour concert on Saturday. “Pinauna ng staff ang senior citizens. Nang makita sila ng mga tao, bigla na lang nag-cheer at nagpalakpakan ang buong crowd. Sobrang heartwarming kasi nakakatuwang makita na hanggang ngayon, maraming senior fans pa rin ng F4 na dumayo para manood ng concert,” she told The Philippine STAR. In the video, it was evident that they were so excited to meet F4's Jerry Yan, Van Ness Wu, Vic Chou, and Taiwanese singer Ashin! “Sila ‘yung mga dating nanay na nag-aabang ng ‘Meteor Garden’ tuwing hapon,” she added. Santos, who is also a solid F4 fangirl for 23 years, described the concert as an unforgettable experience. “Hanggang ngayon, hindi pa rin ako maka-move on sa concert. Mahigit 20 years ko itong hinintay, kaya isa ito sa pinakamagandang araw sa buhay ko,” she added. As of this writing, the uploaded video on social media has garnered more than 2.4 million views! “Mabuhay ang mga anak na tinupad ang pangarap ng mga nanay nila,” a netizen commented. (Video courtesy of GB Jeshireen Santos) If you have a story, picture, or video you wish to share, you may join our community page.

The Philippine Star

44,712 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Bill Gurley on what he learned from his mistake of not investing in Google’s Series A “The biggest mistake I ever made is I met Larry [Page] and Sergey [Brin] when they had 25 employees at Google and had them present to my partnership, and we didn’t follow through and try to invest.” Bill reflects on what he learned from this: “A lot of people talk about this in venture, but you have asymmetric returns — you can lose 1x your money, but when you miss on [a Google], you can miss out on 10,000x your money. So we had a saying internally, ‘What could go right?’ We never sweated a zero… But when we miss big winners, we talk about that frequently…. And one interesting thing about venture is it’s a complex system and there are no rules… I’ve often thought about it as: You develop a set of pattern recognition, which is enhanced if you’re working with a partnership because everybody has their own. And then you have like 10 loose rules that you apply when you see a company. But a lot of the times when you make a great investment, it’s because decide to relax one or two of those rules.” He emphasizes that Google wasn’t an obvious winner at the time: “Yahoo had fallen from $82 to $10 as a public company. Excite was in bankruptcy. These were the other search companies at the time. Larry and Sergey both wanted to be CEO and they were PhD students at Stanford. Co-CEO PhD students is not on the checklist. And they wanted a really high price.” But what Bill finds most interesting is that two of the all-time great venture capitalists were able to look past these problems: “Two of the very best venture capitalists of all time — John Doerr and Mike Moritz — did the deal. So they had a superior mental framework in that situation and broke a lot of the rules. Another thing was they split the deal at a really high price so their ownership was much lower than they traditionally get. But they knew to break that rule at the time.” Bill gives Tesla as another example of an investment that “likely violated most people’s entire rule set” but being contrarian is what made the return so high. Video source: Texas McCombs (2025)

Startup Archive

170,985 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Mark: is there anything cute that you guys do for each other that fans dont know 🍅: …there’s nothing — its feels like we‘ve been together— you get that feeling we’re old grandma-grandpa?? It doesn’t look like— 🦊: but i have one na ~ Mark: you answered it as if you were together ! Believe it or not, it’s like you’re lovers! 🍅: friends! Mark: no! Im not saying that you’re lovers— calm down! I was saying you said as if you’re lovers! AS IF!! His eyes are changing!! 🍅: im mad 🤣🤣 Mark: the thing is when people are dating for so long, they don’t really notice those small, cute things that the other do for them, they’re used to it. Its like at first when they’re flirting, they’ll notice it, see it all, but once they’re in a relationship , they’re used to be treated like that 🦊: agree Mark: right, FEEL LIKE lovers, but actually FRIENDS 🦊: there’s sound too? Mark: p force said he got one 🦊: there is, the most recent time when we went out eating together and go to work together right? I had to go look at this one shop down stairs. 🦊: Yeah, and he waited for me— When i went up to eat, he alr boiled everything and prepared it for me, and he’d scoop some and set it aside for me. He never just ate first even if he was hungry, but he will still wait and still share with me 🍅: Actually, I secretly grabbed some already 😂😂😂 🍅: ok i remember this one too, if force told that story, its the same day. We finished eating and its time to pay right? And force just left and paid for it. He didn’t even text me how much it was or anything, i think its cute. Mark: he just went and paid for it? 🍅: yeah— 🦊: of course i pay 🍅: and then i texted him and asked how much it was, he replied „abt 1000 baht“ 🦊: that’s cuz you asked. 🍅: yeah but at first he didn’t mention it at all thats cute Mark: so he said 1000baht then-? 🍅: i transferred it. 🦊: he’s got my account number alr Mark: you don’t wanna trouble him, so you wanna pay for it 🍅: eat together, share the bill! Mark: you guys share a wallets alr, cuz you’re together— opps my bad— FORCEBOOK MOS PRESS #MelodyOfSecretsLIVE #ฟอสบุ๊ค #MelodyOfSecrets

Ryan_tomafox ( s l o w )

29,721 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Can United States manufacture robots? Matic Robots says "yes." It makes the best floor cleaning robot, that has won many perfect scores from Wired to many others. We love ours. But my trip there to get a tour from AI pioneer Navneet Dalal Navneet Dalal provided some real insights into how hard it is for a hardware company to make hardware in the United States. And how deeply AI is changing consumer electronics products that are going to be in many more homes soon. In this first part (Part II coming tomorrow) we get a look at how long it took for this company to go through prototypes to a shipping product. In the second part, you'll see the scaling hell that it takes to even ship a few thousand robots and the kinds of problems that scaling up a factory brings. Matic is one of my favorite small Silicon Valley companies. It has found what we call "product market fit." I just came back from CES where I saw many of its competitors, and the Matic wins because of not just the product thinking of Mehul and Navneet Dalal but because of their AI leadership. In a way their robot took many lessons from Tesla, from where to put the batteries to its bet on computer vision, which Navneet has been a pioneer in for years, working quietly behind the scenes. It is about to move into a new location that will allow it to grow to meet the demand that now is showing up (the boxes in its lobby show that it's outgrowing its current facilities). In terms of AI, it has aspirations of making a humanoid too, but it is taking a far more measured approach to getting there. By starting on the floor it can not just build world models based on real world data (customers are given a choice whether to allow its data to be used that way. Most customers choose to keep their data on the robot only, for privacy reasons, but if you opt in you can help them improve their models). They are using that data to understand homes. Navneet told me they hit very unusual situations in people's homes already that they couldn't really predict in simulators, like full-wall mirrors that confuse computer vision systems, or pools and water features in people's homes. Having real customers brings a ton of customer feedback about how to further improve the robot, and, as Navneet demonstrates in the second video, forces them to build a manufacturing muscle memory. Getting teams to work together, figuring out how to solve supply chain problems, from Trump's tarriffs, to a new one that showed up over the past couple of weeks. A supplier for its bags (one of the cheaper parts that goes into the robot) changed the glue it used, which caused robots to fail quality tests and the manufacturing line to stop. Reminds me a lot of the hell Elon Musk faced in its Fremont factory when Tesla was first starting to manufacture its Model 3, which almost bankrupted the company. Off the record Mehul and Navneet 🇮🇳 showed me some of the prototypes and plans for its next products that will show up over the next few years. Certainly not as sexy as Tesla, Figure, 1x_tech, and all the Chinese manufacturers are showing off already, but far better thought out for the typical Western home and AI plays a huge role in its future. It is the product that speaks for itself. It's amazing, and is about to get better this year due to AI. It's the first real vision-only robot to be in my home and I bet it won't be the last from this company. Real honor that they invited me over with my Insta360 camera (another company launched in my home, just like Matic was last year). In Part II we go into the factory.

Robert Scoble

69,229 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

FAREWELL JEEVES, WE DIDN’T KNOW YOU WERE STILL AROUND. The Rise and Fall of Ask Jeeves: An Internet Pioneer Says Goodbye Back in the late 1990s, one search engine stood out with its friendly butler mascot and a simple promise: just type your question in plain English. Herr is the interesting part, I always thought this site would be the perfect site for AI answers. In fact I wrote a letter to the company in 2004 I preposed 45 AI subjects to start with using my expert system technology. There was a lot of interest but they got sold. Ask Jeeves launched in 1997 and quickly became a beloved part of the early web. Founded in 1996 by Garrett Gruener and David Warthen in Berkeley, California, Ask Jeeves aimed to make the internet feel personal. Jeeves, inspired by the helpful valet from literature, was marketed as the world’s first internet butler. Early TV commercials from 1999 introduced him to millions. During the dot-com boom, Ask Jeeves soared in popularity. It went public in 1999, survived the bust, and acquired better search tech like Teoma in 2001. Those quirky ads with Jeeves helping users find answers to odd questions captured the fun spirit of the early internet. In 2005, IAC acquired the company for about 1.85 billion dollars. By 2006, they dropped the Jeeves name and mascot, rebranding simply as The focus shifted away from the butler toward more standard search and later question and answer formats. Over time, competition from Google proved too strong. pivoted to user generated question and answer content but saw its traffic decline. It lingered for years as a nostalgic remnant of the old web, no longer a major player in search. Then, on May 1, 2026, the end came. Parent company IAC announced it was shutting down its search business entirely. The homepage now features a farewell: Every great search must come to an end. After nearly 30 years of answering the world’s questions, has closed. The message thanks users and the team, ending with Jeeves spirit endures. The shutdown marks the end of one of the internet’s earliest and most memorable search engines. It pioneered natural language search long before today’s AI assistants made asking questions cool again. Ask Jeeves may be gone, but it leaves behind a legacy of making the web more approachable. It reminds us of a time when search felt fun and human. Today you could have been a contender…

Brian Roemmele

11,354 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Eight months ago, David Sacks, the White House AI and Crypto Czar publicly accused Anthropic of running a sophisticated regulatory capture campaign built on fear mongering (save this). People thought it was a spicy take and then Fable 5 release just turned it into evidence. When Anthropic released its Mythos-class models, it disclosed that every prompt and output sent through them would be retained for 30 days with no exceptions including for enterprise customers who had previously signed zero data retention agreements, and for up to two years if a prompt was flagged by a safety classifier. Microsoft moved so quickly that it restricted its own employees from using Claude Fable 5 within days of the release, citing the retention terms as incompatible with its internal policies, the largest enterprise software company in the world treating the new terms as a non-starter. But the data retention was not even the part that generated the most outrage in the developer community. The system card also disclosed that for users Anthropic suspected of working on frontier AI research, chip design, or competing model development, the system would automatically route those requests to a less capable model without telling the user, rewrite the prompt in the background, deliver a deliberately degraded response, and charge full price for access to a frontier model the user was not actually receiving. Business Insider confirmed that Anthropic's own apology acknowledged the company was intentionally giving worse answers and concealing that fact from paying customers. The examples of who triggered these filters make the safety justification difficult to defend, Ben Thompson from Stratechery was flagged for asking about the relationship between GLP-1s and cancer risk, and users asking routine questions about mitochondria were quietly downgraded, none of them aware it was happening. Under pressure, Anthropic walked back the narrowest possible piece of the policy, they will now disclose when a request is being downgraded. The underlying architecture, the 30 day retention, the behavioral profiling, the routing tiers, and the two-class access system remains fully intact. This is the part that makes David Sacks argument from October 2025 land differently today. He argued that Anthropic's safety positioning was principally a regulatory capture strategy using fear-based arguments to shape rules that would entrench incumbents and damage the broader startup ecosystem. The Fable 5 disclosure shows a company that used safety language to justify building an opaque, paternalistic system where Anthropic alone decides who is worthy of frontier AI access, profiles users to enforce that decision and collects full payment regardless.

Milk Road AI

47,312 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Cocchiarella: Has there ever been a moment when you really revered the intelligence of Don Jr.? Ansari: I can’t say there has been. Cocchiarella: But you’ve never gone, “Wow, that guy, he’s really on it”? No? Nothing like that? Ansari: No. Cocchiarella: Because there’s new reporting about his venture capital firm, 1789 Capital. It is now posting, in its first few years, a 200% return, which beats most firms of a similar kind. And that’s why I wanted to ask you: Do you think this is investing whiz Don Jr. finally finding his calling, or is this more corruption? Ansari: Don Jr. has used every minute of this Trump 2.0 term to make himself as rich as possible. That is his goal. His dad is helping him with that. They are all in on this. It has been so disgusting and so shameful to see what’s happening right before our eyes. This venture capital firm that he’s a partner in—there have been a number of examples. I think the most appalling is a recent one, when the venture capital firm invested in, I think, a rare earth mining company of some sort. Shortly after that, the Pentagon provided a $620 million loan to the company. It was then reported that a senior White House official, Mr. Navarro, who is a close friend of Don Jr.’s, personally intervened to make sure the loan went out from the Pentagon and that the company was prioritized. And that story is not unique at all. There have been examples ranging from drone companies to mining companies to crypto schemes, where the Trump kids—and Donald Trump Jr. in particular—have been at the forefront through his venture capital firm, making those investments, and then suddenly contracts are awarded by the U.S. federal government. It is so disgusting. I think if you look at the broader context we’re in right now with this illegal war in Iran, there is no doubt in my mind that much of this war is about profiting the Trump family and Trump’s orbit. A few people are making a lot of money at the expense of our economy, the U.S. economy, and the global economy. Now 18 U.S. service members have been killed. Thousands of Iranian civilians have been killed. Meanwhile, Donald Trump Jr. is making billions of dollars.

Acyn

120,564 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella's new interivew: Explains how the next AI moat will not be the model you use, but the learning loop only your company can run. He is really asking what happens to the firm when intelligence becomes something you can rent. For a century, companies protected value through people, processes, data, routines, customer memory, and the tacit knowledge buried in daily operations. Foundation models threaten to flatten that advantage because the same general intelligence can be used by everyone. Nadella’s answer is that firms need their own “hill climbing machine,” a private loop where models learn from company-specific tasks, traces, evaluations, and outcomes. That means the real asset is not just the model. The asset is the environment that keeps improving the model in ways competitors cannot copy. Private evals become strategic memory. Workflow traces become training signal. Human judgment becomes a way to steer compounding, not just correct mistakes. This also reframes AI adoption: a company that only consumes a foundation model may gain productivity, but it may leak the deeper value of its operating knowledge. A company that builds a disciplined learning loop can turn everyday work into accumulating IP. The future firm may therefore be measured by how well it converts its unique activity into durable model improvement. The frontier will not belong only to whoever owns the largest model. It will belong to whoever owns the best loop. ---- From "Stanford Online" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

83,321 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I thought AEO (read: SEO for LLMs) was a hunk of bullsh*t. And then i spoke to KippBodnar.eth, CMO of HubSpot, who knocked the skepticism out of me. His first jab: In one year, they grew AI search traffic by 15x. It went from rounding error to real line item on the P&L. His second jab: AI search conversion rates are 5x higher than Google search. On some queries, 13x higher. His hook: 60% of AI citations don't come from the top 20 Google results. The companies dominating Google aren't automatically winning in AI search, which creates a huge advantage for early adopters. He then took me through his process for crushing AEO & seeing results in days, not months (like SEO): 1) Grade: your current AEO presence across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini with a tool like Hubspot's AEO grader. 2) Restructure: your content into chunked, answer-first pages with natural language headers. - one consolidated page, not 8-10 interlinked pages - lead with natural language questions like "What is X?" - 1-2 paragraph sections, not 1,000 word sections - table of contents on a single page 3) Separate: Mentions from citations and optimize differently for each - Mention = when AI references your brand or product in its answer but doesn't link to you - Citation = when an AI references you AND links to your page 4) Open up: your information — ungate content, build Reddit presence, make pricing public - Optimize for entity understanding: how well do AI models understand what your company does, based on every signal from Reddit to review sites, awards lists to help docs 5) Tool up: with AEO-specific software to track prompts and share of voice - Check out Xfunnel or Limey[.]ai 6) Rethink attribution: measure source of customers, not source of traffic. - Metrics that matter: share of voice, citation count, sentiment, mention frequency, source of customers not traffic

Alex Lieberman

98,635 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten