Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

When your girlfriend thirsty She need strong Shaker and Powerful Whey Protein. BBC ♠️ has the Power #CleanUp #cumeating #bbc #bbcbull #BlackBulls #interracial #breedingwhore #breedher #breeding #cuckoldcleaning #Cheating #bigblackcock #Whitgirls

Dangerislove23's profile picture

DangerBBC♠️F©️22K+

18,442 subscribers

41,479 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#CleanUp#cumeating#bbc#bbcbull#BlackBulls#interracial#breedingwhore#breedher#breeding#cuckoldcleaning#Cheating#bigblackcock#Whitgirls
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

"Power wears out those who don't have it" (The Godfather) One of the reasons why the zombie seems to be envious of Cihan is his ease of welding power. Cihan commands and people obey. Take a look at the following scenes, for example. In the first, Cihan makes his point and holds Sadakat's stare well enough to get her back off, thereby getting what he wants. In the second clip, we see Boran trying to intimidate Sadakat, but when she stares him down, he is the one to back off. Thereby signaling that Boran is only pretending to wield power. In that first scene, Cihan meets Sadakat’s gaze without flinching and without escalation. There's no rush; he simply waits. And Sadakat, who understands the dynamics of power, steps back because she recognizes certainty when she sees it. Boran, on the other hand, performs having power rather than embodying it. His attempt to intimidate Sadakat is fueled by insecurity, not authority. When Sadakat returns his stare unimpressed, Boran folds. This is exactly what the quote “Power wears out those who don’t have it" means. Boran is exhausted by the constant need to assert, threaten, and posture. Cihan doesn't have to do such things because everyone already knows what's what and who's who. That is one reason why Boran's envy runs deep. Boran doesn’t just want what Cihan has. He also wants the ease with which Cihan holds it. This is also reflected in the way Alya loves and defends Cihan, something that drives Boran crazy. But what he doesn't realize is love, unlike power, responds to reciprocity. And since Boran's love for Alya was never true, her love for him was never as strong or as powerful as her love for Cihan. #CihAl #UzakŞehir
0:33

"Power wears out those who don't have it" (The Godfather) One of the reasons why the zombie seems to be envious of Cihan is his ease of welding power. Cihan commands and people obey. Take a look at the following scenes, for example. In the first, Cihan makes his point and holds Sadakat's stare well enough to get her back off, thereby getting what he wants. In the second clip, we see Boran trying to intimidate Sadakat, but when she stares him down, he is the one to back off. Thereby signaling that Boran is only pretending to wield power. In that first scene, Cihan meets Sadakat’s gaze without flinching and without escalation. There's no rush; he simply waits. And Sadakat, who understands the dynamics of power, steps back because she recognizes certainty when she sees it. Boran, on the other hand, performs having power rather than embodying it. His attempt to intimidate Sadakat is fueled by insecurity, not authority. When Sadakat returns his stare unimpressed, Boran folds. This is exactly what the quote “Power wears out those who don’t have it" means. Boran is exhausted by the constant need to assert, threaten, and posture. Cihan doesn't have to do such things because everyone already knows what's what and who's who. That is one reason why Boran's envy runs deep. Boran doesn’t just want what Cihan has. He also wants the ease with which Cihan holds it. This is also reflected in the way Alya loves and defends Cihan, something that drives Boran crazy. But what he doesn't realize is love, unlike power, responds to reciprocity. And since Boran's love for Alya was never true, her love for him was never as strong or as powerful as her love for Cihan. #CihAl #UzakŞehir

CocoLoco

19,921 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

After watching this video, I came to agree with oseni rufai that Landmark Beach Resort and other Estates in Lagos was destroyed intentionally, not for road development. Believe me, the late Buhari wasn’t this dangerous and heartless toward investors who came willingly to invest in Nigeria during his presidency, but today we have Bola Tinubu running a cartel system of governance with power drunk individuals. The first method for estimating the intelligence of a ruler is to look at the men he has around him. If a man surrounds himself with flatterers, cowards, power-drunk individuals, and people who only agree with him, he is not truly powerful. He is controlled by the need to feel safe. Strong leaders do the opposite. They keep sharp, capable people close, even those who challenge them, because strength grows through pressure, not comfort. You can pretend to be confident and wear the mask of authority, but your circle always reveals the truth in how weak and corrupt you are. The people beside you show your standards, your courage, and your ambition. When you surround yourself with fools, their mistakes become your failures. When you surround yourself with thinkers and intelligent people, their victories strengthen your rule. We fail to understand that power is never built alone. It is built by the hands you choose to trust. In the end, the world judges you not only by what you achieved, but by who stood beside you while you were building it. Tinubu is dangerous. David Umahi is evil!
1:43

After watching this video, I came to agree with oseni rufai that Landmark Beach Resort and other Estates in Lagos was destroyed intentionally, not for road development. Believe me, the late Buhari wasn’t this dangerous and heartless toward investors who came willingly to invest in Nigeria during his presidency, but today we have Bola Tinubu running a cartel system of governance with power drunk individuals. The first method for estimating the intelligence of a ruler is to look at the men he has around him. If a man surrounds himself with flatterers, cowards, power-drunk individuals, and people who only agree with him, he is not truly powerful. He is controlled by the need to feel safe. Strong leaders do the opposite. They keep sharp, capable people close, even those who challenge them, because strength grows through pressure, not comfort. You can pretend to be confident and wear the mask of authority, but your circle always reveals the truth in how weak and corrupt you are. The people beside you show your standards, your courage, and your ambition. When you surround yourself with fools, their mistakes become your failures. When you surround yourself with thinkers and intelligent people, their victories strengthen your rule. We fail to understand that power is never built alone. It is built by the hands you choose to trust. In the end, the world judges you not only by what you achieved, but by who stood beside you while you were building it. Tinubu is dangerous. David Umahi is evil!

Felix

34,306 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

POST OFFICE LAWYER WHO REFUSED TO TESTIFY NOW FACES HER OWN TRIBUNAL Jane MacLeod ran the Post Office legal department from 2015 to 2019. That is the exact window when the organisation was busy defending itself against the subpostmasters it had already destroyed. In 2024 the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry asked her to come and explain herself. She said no. She offered a written statement instead and argued too much time had passed for her memory to matter. Inquiry chair Sir Wyn Williams offered to pay her flights and hotel from Australia where she now lives. She still refused, in person or by video link. He admitted publicly that forcing her back would need a criminal conviction and possibly extradition. That process would outlast most subpostmasters patience for justice. So she walked. Now the Solicitors Regulation Authority SRA has referred her to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. The allegation covers April to July 2024, when she failed to cooperate fully with the Inquiry. She is also named as a significant individual in the Metropolitan Police investigation Operation Olympos. When BBC cameras doorstepped her about documents suggesting the Post Office lied about knowing Horizon was faulty, her answer was no comment. A strong move from someone who used to run a legal team built on telling the public the opposite. Over 900 subpostmasters were wrongly prosecuted between 1999 and 2009 because of broken Fujitsu software. Lives and marriages were wrecked while people in her position drafted the legal advice that kept the lie standing. A second solicitor, Nick Gould, has also been referred, over how he charged exonerated subpostmistresses for help after their convictions were quashed. dodging a public inquiry from the other side of the planet while your victims are still waiting for compensation says plenty on its own. Sources: ComputerWeekly Law Society Gazette Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry SRA Nick Wallis
0:33

POST OFFICE LAWYER WHO REFUSED TO TESTIFY NOW FACES HER OWN TRIBUNAL Jane MacLeod ran the Post Office legal department from 2015 to 2019. That is the exact window when the organisation was busy defending itself against the subpostmasters it had already destroyed. In 2024 the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry asked her to come and explain herself. She said no. She offered a written statement instead and argued too much time had passed for her memory to matter. Inquiry chair Sir Wyn Williams offered to pay her flights and hotel from Australia where she now lives. She still refused, in person or by video link. He admitted publicly that forcing her back would need a criminal conviction and possibly extradition. That process would outlast most subpostmasters patience for justice. So she walked. Now the Solicitors Regulation Authority SRA has referred her to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. The allegation covers April to July 2024, when she failed to cooperate fully with the Inquiry. She is also named as a significant individual in the Metropolitan Police investigation Operation Olympos. When BBC cameras doorstepped her about documents suggesting the Post Office lied about knowing Horizon was faulty, her answer was no comment. A strong move from someone who used to run a legal team built on telling the public the opposite. Over 900 subpostmasters were wrongly prosecuted between 1999 and 2009 because of broken Fujitsu software. Lives and marriages were wrecked while people in her position drafted the legal advice that kept the lie standing. A second solicitor, Nick Gould, has also been referred, over how he charged exonerated subpostmistresses for help after their convictions were quashed. dodging a public inquiry from the other side of the planet while your victims are still waiting for compensation says plenty on its own. Sources: ComputerWeekly Law Society Gazette Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry SRA Nick Wallis

Artur Nadolny

66,184 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Carol Vorderman, "Trust in politics is lower than ever" "Trust in newspapers.. Even wikipedia won't accept many, including the Daily Mail, as a reliable data source" "Trust in broadcast is in doubt" "And trust in the BBC is declining.. It's fallen 20% in the five years since 2018" "And distrust in the BBS had grown in that time from 11% to 26%" "Is it any wonder that's how so many people feel after so many controversial decisions by BBC management" "The handling of Hugh Edwards.. The ludicrous suspension of Gary Linekar after referencing a tweet by Suella Braverman, are you mad?" "Politics.. Arrogance.. Snobbery.. Leads to disillusionment" "The rich and powerful corrupted politics.. The upper middles taking broadcast for themselves" "The increasingly absurd right wing newspaper headlines being promoted by political programs" "What has this got to do with class? Everything. Literally everything" "After 14 years of austerity and lying by the privileged political class, this country is in an absolute mess" "And the TV industry must accept part of the responsibility for that too.. Including the riots" "We used to be the message makers.. How responsible have we been with those messages.. Not very.. Reckless" "The normalising and platforming of Nigel Farage on I'm a celebrity" *huge clap from the audience* "Oh Nigel is just Nigel.. Nothing to do with me.. What planet is that person on who thinks that?" "The Tufton street mob, opaquely funded right wing lobbying groups.. Appearing as so called independent voices.. So many times on BBC political programs they've probably got their own dressing rooms" "Note, the disgraced BBC Chairman, Richard Sharp had been a director of the right wing policy studies: address, 57 Tufton Street" "You so often give credibility to those who deserve none at all. And when people feel they have no voice, there is a vacuum" "And who floods in to fill the vacuum? The far right" "You cannot be an industry with the power to create the conversation and then claim tat nothing is your responsibility"
4:09

Carol Vorderman, "Trust in politics is lower than ever" "Trust in newspapers.. Even wikipedia won't accept many, including the Daily Mail, as a reliable data source" "Trust in broadcast is in doubt" "And trust in the BBC is declining.. It's fallen 20% in the five years since 2018" "And distrust in the BBS had grown in that time from 11% to 26%" "Is it any wonder that's how so many people feel after so many controversial decisions by BBC management" "The handling of Hugh Edwards.. The ludicrous suspension of Gary Linekar after referencing a tweet by Suella Braverman, are you mad?" "Politics.. Arrogance.. Snobbery.. Leads to disillusionment" "The rich and powerful corrupted politics.. The upper middles taking broadcast for themselves" "The increasingly absurd right wing newspaper headlines being promoted by political programs" "What has this got to do with class? Everything. Literally everything" "After 14 years of austerity and lying by the privileged political class, this country is in an absolute mess" "And the TV industry must accept part of the responsibility for that too.. Including the riots" "We used to be the message makers.. How responsible have we been with those messages.. Not very.. Reckless" "The normalising and platforming of Nigel Farage on I'm a celebrity" *huge clap from the audience* "Oh Nigel is just Nigel.. Nothing to do with me.. What planet is that person on who thinks that?" "The Tufton street mob, opaquely funded right wing lobbying groups.. Appearing as so called independent voices.. So many times on BBC political programs they've probably got their own dressing rooms" "Note, the disgraced BBC Chairman, Richard Sharp had been a director of the right wing policy studies: address, 57 Tufton Street" "You so often give credibility to those who deserve none at all. And when people feel they have no voice, there is a vacuum" "And who floods in to fill the vacuum? The far right" "You cannot be an industry with the power to create the conversation and then claim tat nothing is your responsibility"

Farrukh

301,407 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🎙️ Injured by Covid Jab To Discover Spike Detox Ep. 79 with Dr Tina Peers My guest today is Dr. Tina Peers, a UK-based naturopathic holistic practitioner with extensive experience treating long Covid, vaccine-related injuries, and mast cell activation syndrome. With over 40 years of clinical experience, Tina was early to identify the role of spike protein toxicity and immune dysregulation in post-Covid illness. In this episode, we explore how she helped patients recover using simple over-the-counter treatments at a time when public health authorities had not yet acknowledged the issue. Tina shares her own vaccine injury story, the rise in autoimmune and neurological conditions she has seen in her clinic, and a promising detox protocol using augmented NAC to help clear spike protein from the body. This is a must listen for anyone seeking answers to unexplained post-Covid symptoms or injuries following the jab. This episode is a powerful reminder of the need to question official narratives and take control of your health. ► If you got value, please like, comment, share, follow and support my work. Thank you! 0:00 Coming Up… 1:03 Introduction to Dr. Tina Peers & Her Mission 3:25 Mast Cell Activation Syndrome: Explanation 9:15 Ad Break: Trezor & BTC Prague 10:40 Linking Covid, Cytokine Storms & Mast Cells 17:20 Long Covid - A Rebrand of Mast Cell Activation? 20:14 Is Covid a Novel Virus / Toxin? 21:00 Clinical Observations of Covid Patients 24:28 Shedding of Spike Protein - Pharma Companies Were Aware 25:20 The Problem With Spike Protein 26:15 Tina’s Personal Injection Injury & Regret 33:20 Ad Break: Expat Money & Mattias Desmet Masterclass 35:11 Common Injuries & Adverse Reactions; Clotting, Myocarditis, Cancer 41:10 Spike Toxicity, Autoimmune Disruption, Sudden Deaths, SV40 51:40 The Augmented NAC & Spike Detox Protocol 57:05 Tina’s Recovery & Patient Results 1:01:25 Where To Get The Augmented NAC 1:02:40 Final Thoughts: Mission, Hope & Holistic Healing >>
1:08:53

🎙️ Injured by Covid Jab To Discover Spike Detox Ep. 79 with Dr Tina Peers My guest today is Dr. Tina Peers, a UK-based naturopathic holistic practitioner with extensive experience treating long Covid, vaccine-related injuries, and mast cell activation syndrome. With over 40 years of clinical experience, Tina was early to identify the role of spike protein toxicity and immune dysregulation in post-Covid illness. In this episode, we explore how she helped patients recover using simple over-the-counter treatments at a time when public health authorities had not yet acknowledged the issue. Tina shares her own vaccine injury story, the rise in autoimmune and neurological conditions she has seen in her clinic, and a promising detox protocol using augmented NAC to help clear spike protein from the body. This is a must listen for anyone seeking answers to unexplained post-Covid symptoms or injuries following the jab. This episode is a powerful reminder of the need to question official narratives and take control of your health. ► If you got value, please like, comment, share, follow and support my work. Thank you! 0:00 Coming Up… 1:03 Introduction to Dr. Tina Peers & Her Mission 3:25 Mast Cell Activation Syndrome: Explanation 9:15 Ad Break: Trezor & BTC Prague 10:40 Linking Covid, Cytokine Storms & Mast Cells 17:20 Long Covid - A Rebrand of Mast Cell Activation? 20:14 Is Covid a Novel Virus / Toxin? 21:00 Clinical Observations of Covid Patients 24:28 Shedding of Spike Protein - Pharma Companies Were Aware 25:20 The Problem With Spike Protein 26:15 Tina’s Personal Injection Injury & Regret 33:20 Ad Break: Expat Money & Mattias Desmet Masterclass 35:11 Common Injuries & Adverse Reactions; Clotting, Myocarditis, Cancer 41:10 Spike Toxicity, Autoimmune Disruption, Sudden Deaths, SV40 51:40 The Augmented NAC & Spike Detox Protocol 57:05 Tina’s Recovery & Patient Results 1:01:25 Where To Get The Augmented NAC 1:02:40 Final Thoughts: Mission, Hope & Holistic Healing >>

Efrat Fenigson

62,989 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Jess Phillips sat in a Channel 4 studio this week and admitted she always knew rapists would walk out of prison early under the bill she voted for. When she was asked whether it haunts her, she said it doesn't. The clip has gone everywhere. Almost nobody has looked past it. I did. I pulled the division lists from Parliament's own records and went back through legislation her own government passed in 2024. What I found dismantles every word of the defence she gave in that studio. She had a way to keep child rapists behind bars. It already existed. It had already worked. And I can prove she knew. The first seven hundred offenders walk in September. Victims are already opening the letters. Read my article here; _________ I’m Raja Miah MBE. For nearly eight years, I have led a campaign that exposed how senior Labour politicians helped protect Pakistani rape gangs. The people of my town helped force the national inquiry. You won’t see me on the BBC. You won’t read my work in the legacy press. That’s not an accident. I take this to a place from where there is no coming back. I document everything in my newsletter. It’s 100% free to read. If this work matters to you, if you believe it must continue, I need your backing. My work is free. No paywalls. No gatekeeping. No exclusions. Because the truth shouldn’t belong only to those who can afford it. If you can afford to do so, supporting me costs as little as 75p a week (£30 a year). Sign up here; If you can’t commit to a regular subscription, a one-off contribution genuinely helps keep this alive. You can support me using one of these links; We’re up against a machine, politicians, police, officials, and media, working together to shrink, sanitise, and bury the truth. This work survives because of you. If you’ve ever shared my posts, learned something, or felt less alone reading them, stand with me. I need your help. Raja Miah MBE
4:07

Jess Phillips sat in a Channel 4 studio this week and admitted she always knew rapists would walk out of prison early under the bill she voted for. When she was asked whether it haunts her, she said it doesn't. The clip has gone everywhere. Almost nobody has looked past it. I did. I pulled the division lists from Parliament's own records and went back through legislation her own government passed in 2024. What I found dismantles every word of the defence she gave in that studio. She had a way to keep child rapists behind bars. It already existed. It had already worked. And I can prove she knew. The first seven hundred offenders walk in September. Victims are already opening the letters. Read my article here; _________ I’m Raja Miah MBE. For nearly eight years, I have led a campaign that exposed how senior Labour politicians helped protect Pakistani rape gangs. The people of my town helped force the national inquiry. You won’t see me on the BBC. You won’t read my work in the legacy press. That’s not an accident. I take this to a place from where there is no coming back. I document everything in my newsletter. It’s 100% free to read. If this work matters to you, if you believe it must continue, I need your backing. My work is free. No paywalls. No gatekeeping. No exclusions. Because the truth shouldn’t belong only to those who can afford it. If you can afford to do so, supporting me costs as little as 75p a week (£30 a year). Sign up here; If you can’t commit to a regular subscription, a one-off contribution genuinely helps keep this alive. You can support me using one of these links; We’re up against a machine, politicians, police, officials, and media, working together to shrink, sanitise, and bury the truth. This work survives because of you. If you’ve ever shared my posts, learned something, or felt less alone reading them, stand with me. I need your help. Raja Miah MBE

Raja Miah

193,886 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

EMBARRASSING VIDEO LEAK REVEALS MASSIVE POLITICAL MEDDLING The US engaged in political meddling on a massive scale in Moldova, it was revealed in an embarrassing video leak that went viral this week. The shocking truth came direct from the lips of the former head of USAID, Samantha Power, who thought she was having a private conversation with a senior Ukrainian statesman. This is actually hilarious. Pranksters tricked Ms Power into revealed classified in a zoom conversation—and then uploaded the video onto the internet. Now the people who did this, Vovan and Lexus, are known as a pair of pranksters. But they are really doing a important public service—they are doing the work of journalists, because they are good at reaching famous people, and then showing the world what’s really happening. . 'RUSSIAN MEDDLING' Here’s the background of the story in 30 seconds: In recent years, every major western mainstream media outlet has repeatedly reported that Russia was meddling in Moldova’s elections by flooding the political scene with cash and grooming puppet leadership. But independent reporters, including me, said the exact opposite was happening: Whatever Russia may or may not be doing, the main thing that was happening in that little country was that the wealthy US was meddling in Moldova’s elections by flooding the political scene with cash and grooming puppet leadership. So which was telling the truth? The Guardian, the BBC, DW, Le Monde, etc? Or the independent voices? We now have the answer. . 'UNPRECEDENTED SPENDING' Ms Power admitted on video in an August conversation that went viral this week that they were the ones spending tens of millions of dollars and grooming a leader, Maia Sandu. This just confirms what smart people already know. The Guardian, the BBC, etc—too often, they print propaganda, not journalism. You and me, the independent voices, the citizen journalists, the people who aren’t pushing the Pentagon agenda – we are the people doing actual journalism. I won’t play you the whole conversation, because it goes on for 15 minutes, but the video includes some good lines. She revealed that they delivered "unprecedented spending" of tens of millions of US taxpayer dollars to Moldova listed under "Ukraine supplementals". “We surged resources, I can’t remember now the numbers, but I mean the so called ‘Ukraine supplementals’ always had tens of millions of dollars also for Moldova," she said. . SUBTLE MEDDLING She also admitted that when people talk about western support they think about the weapons that are sent to countries, and the top-end political manipulation by people like Victoria Nuland, but they never really consider the highly effective more subtle meddling that happens through cash-distributing groups like USAID. “People when they think about western support, they think about arms, and they think about Toria Nuland and, like, interference, you know; they don’t think about these kinds of more subtle support,” she said. Stay alert. Trump has largely defunded USAID but the NED and the CIA are as rich as ever. Don’t let them do to your country what they’ve done to so many others.
3:37

EMBARRASSING VIDEO LEAK REVEALS MASSIVE POLITICAL MEDDLING The US engaged in political meddling on a massive scale in Moldova, it was revealed in an embarrassing video leak that went viral this week. The shocking truth came direct from the lips of the former head of USAID, Samantha Power, who thought she was having a private conversation with a senior Ukrainian statesman. This is actually hilarious. Pranksters tricked Ms Power into revealed classified in a zoom conversation—and then uploaded the video onto the internet. Now the people who did this, Vovan and Lexus, are known as a pair of pranksters. But they are really doing a important public service—they are doing the work of journalists, because they are good at reaching famous people, and then showing the world what’s really happening. . 'RUSSIAN MEDDLING' Here’s the background of the story in 30 seconds: In recent years, every major western mainstream media outlet has repeatedly reported that Russia was meddling in Moldova’s elections by flooding the political scene with cash and grooming puppet leadership. But independent reporters, including me, said the exact opposite was happening: Whatever Russia may or may not be doing, the main thing that was happening in that little country was that the wealthy US was meddling in Moldova’s elections by flooding the political scene with cash and grooming puppet leadership. So which was telling the truth? The Guardian, the BBC, DW, Le Monde, etc? Or the independent voices? We now have the answer. . 'UNPRECEDENTED SPENDING' Ms Power admitted on video in an August conversation that went viral this week that they were the ones spending tens of millions of dollars and grooming a leader, Maia Sandu. This just confirms what smart people already know. The Guardian, the BBC, etc—too often, they print propaganda, not journalism. You and me, the independent voices, the citizen journalists, the people who aren’t pushing the Pentagon agenda – we are the people doing actual journalism. I won’t play you the whole conversation, because it goes on for 15 minutes, but the video includes some good lines. She revealed that they delivered "unprecedented spending" of tens of millions of US taxpayer dollars to Moldova listed under "Ukraine supplementals". “We surged resources, I can’t remember now the numbers, but I mean the so called ‘Ukraine supplementals’ always had tens of millions of dollars also for Moldova," she said. . SUBTLE MEDDLING She also admitted that when people talk about western support they think about the weapons that are sent to countries, and the top-end political manipulation by people like Victoria Nuland, but they never really consider the highly effective more subtle meddling that happens through cash-distributing groups like USAID. “People when they think about western support, they think about arms, and they think about Toria Nuland and, like, interference, you know; they don’t think about these kinds of more subtle support,” she said. Stay alert. Trump has largely defunded USAID but the NED and the CIA are as rich as ever. Don’t let them do to your country what they’ve done to so many others.

Nury Vittachi

11,731 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

❤️HER NAME IS VIRGINIA GIUFFRE! ❤️ This photo was taken 24 years ago. It is an iconic image. On Friday, the young woman in the image died by suicide. Her name is Virginia Guiffre. She was a fierce warrior for those of us who survived rape or sexual assault - and for those who could never overcome the pain of this trauma. Virginia was raped and trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. She was a teenager when Epstein and his co-accused Ghislaine Maxwell kept Virginia ‘on call for sexual purposes’, 'lending' her to powerful men. One being Prince Andrew. “This is not some sordid sex story. This is a story of being trafficked. This is a story of abuse and this is a story of your guys’ royalty,” she told BBC Panorama in 2019. Three years after that interview - in 2022 - Virginia settled a civil case against the prince. He never went to trial. The prince continually denied it but Virginia said: “He knows what happened. I know what happened. And there’s only one of us telling the truth." The link between suicide, self-harm and sexual violence is rarely talked about - and yet thousands of women experience this daily in Australia. One-third of women who survive rape and/or sexual assault contemplate suicide while 13% will try to end their own lives. Virginia spent many years advocating for - and championing - victims of sexual violence. ‘Her courage pushed me to fight harder, and her strength was awe-inspiring," lawyer Sigrid McCawley said. Virginia lived on a farm in Western Australia and was mum to three children. ‘Despite all the adversity she faced in her life, she shone so bright. She will be missed beyond measure,' her family said in a statement. VIRGINIA GIUFFRE MATTERS!❤️ **** ❤️ Please support my work❤️ I need your support so I can keep telling stories like Virginia's and continue documenting murdered women and children. Please buy a RED HEART t-shirt or consider donating. 100% of money raised funds The RED HEART Campaign and Australian Femicide Watch. LINKS ❤️Donate: ❤️Shop: #femicide #womenssafety #violenceagainstwomen #maleviolence #SheMatters #domesticviolence
3:35

❤️HER NAME IS VIRGINIA GIUFFRE! ❤️ This photo was taken 24 years ago. It is an iconic image. On Friday, the young woman in the image died by suicide. Her name is Virginia Guiffre. She was a fierce warrior for those of us who survived rape or sexual assault - and for those who could never overcome the pain of this trauma. Virginia was raped and trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. She was a teenager when Epstein and his co-accused Ghislaine Maxwell kept Virginia ‘on call for sexual purposes’, 'lending' her to powerful men. One being Prince Andrew. “This is not some sordid sex story. This is a story of being trafficked. This is a story of abuse and this is a story of your guys’ royalty,” she told BBC Panorama in 2019. Three years after that interview - in 2022 - Virginia settled a civil case against the prince. He never went to trial. The prince continually denied it but Virginia said: “He knows what happened. I know what happened. And there’s only one of us telling the truth." The link between suicide, self-harm and sexual violence is rarely talked about - and yet thousands of women experience this daily in Australia. One-third of women who survive rape and/or sexual assault contemplate suicide while 13% will try to end their own lives. Virginia spent many years advocating for - and championing - victims of sexual violence. ‘Her courage pushed me to fight harder, and her strength was awe-inspiring," lawyer Sigrid McCawley said. Virginia lived on a farm in Western Australia and was mum to three children. ‘Despite all the adversity she faced in her life, she shone so bright. She will be missed beyond measure,' her family said in a statement. VIRGINIA GIUFFRE MATTERS!❤️ **** ❤️ Please support my work❤️ I need your support so I can keep telling stories like Virginia's and continue documenting murdered women and children. Please buy a RED HEART t-shirt or consider donating. 100% of money raised funds The RED HEART Campaign and Australian Femicide Watch. LINKS ❤️Donate: ❤️Shop: #femicide #womenssafety #violenceagainstwomen #maleviolence #SheMatters #domesticviolence

Sherele Moody (Femicide Researcher) 🌈

43,005 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A pure gaslighter. A leech on this country. Sitting in Downing Street calling it duty. And today he went on the BBC and proved it. NARCISSIST. DELUSIONAL. CLINGING. DICTATOR IN DENIAL. Pick your word because he gave us all of them today. Duty THREE TIMES. Not vanity TWICE. Definitely not vanity. He said it TWICE. Two defence ministers resigned. Belfast is burning. Britain borrows more than Greece. The man who says it is not about him cannot stop talking about himself. He has confused himself with the country. One in five eligible British voters chose him. The smallest vote share of any majority government since 1830. The Tories disintegrated and he filled the space. He has been governing on a vacuum ever since and calling it a mandate. 95 MPs want him gone. Health Secretary out. Four junior ministers. Four aides. Minus 46% approval. And when Andy Burnham emerged as the most popular challenger Starmer blocked him. Then rewrote the entire party rulebook to make sure it could never happen again. That is not a man afraid of chaos. That is a man who manufactures it to protect himself. He promised to smash the gangs. Crossings 48% higher than 2024. 75% higher than 2023. He didn't smash the gangs. He gave them a bigger runway. The highest tax burden since the Second World War. £333 billion on benefits. £63 billion on net zero. Britain borrowing more than Greece. £13 billion short on defending this country. That is not a government managing an economy. That is a government that has decided what matters. And the military is not on the list. The most dangerous leader is not the one who admits he wants power. It is the one who has convinced himself that clinging to it is noble. He knows exactly what this is. That is what makes it so much worse. The country doesn't need a man who won't walk away. It needs a man who never should have stayed. History will not remember him as dutiful. It will remember him as the man who stayed when leaving was the only honourable thing left to do. A great leader knows when to fight. A greater leader knows when to go. Keir Starmer has confused one for the other. And the country is paying the price.
0:49

A pure gaslighter. A leech on this country. Sitting in Downing Street calling it duty. And today he went on the BBC and proved it. NARCISSIST. DELUSIONAL. CLINGING. DICTATOR IN DENIAL. Pick your word because he gave us all of them today. Duty THREE TIMES. Not vanity TWICE. Definitely not vanity. He said it TWICE. Two defence ministers resigned. Belfast is burning. Britain borrows more than Greece. The man who says it is not about him cannot stop talking about himself. He has confused himself with the country. One in five eligible British voters chose him. The smallest vote share of any majority government since 1830. The Tories disintegrated and he filled the space. He has been governing on a vacuum ever since and calling it a mandate. 95 MPs want him gone. Health Secretary out. Four junior ministers. Four aides. Minus 46% approval. And when Andy Burnham emerged as the most popular challenger Starmer blocked him. Then rewrote the entire party rulebook to make sure it could never happen again. That is not a man afraid of chaos. That is a man who manufactures it to protect himself. He promised to smash the gangs. Crossings 48% higher than 2024. 75% higher than 2023. He didn't smash the gangs. He gave them a bigger runway. The highest tax burden since the Second World War. £333 billion on benefits. £63 billion on net zero. Britain borrowing more than Greece. £13 billion short on defending this country. That is not a government managing an economy. That is a government that has decided what matters. And the military is not on the list. The most dangerous leader is not the one who admits he wants power. It is the one who has convinced himself that clinging to it is noble. He knows exactly what this is. That is what makes it so much worse. The country doesn't need a man who won't walk away. It needs a man who never should have stayed. History will not remember him as dutiful. It will remember him as the man who stayed when leaving was the only honourable thing left to do. A great leader knows when to fight. A greater leader knows when to go. Keir Starmer has confused one for the other. And the country is paying the price.

BanksyCat

104,702 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: "You’re Still Being Tracked": Privacy Expert Naomi Brockwell on Escaping Surveillance in the Digital Age 🔗 Watch: Naomi Brockwell is a globally recognized privacy advocate, tech journalist, and the founder of the Ludlow Institute, an organization focused on privacy education and policy. She is best known for her work promoting digital privacy, decentralized technologies, and civil liberties in the age of surveillance. “Tech is a tool. And I think we sometimes see the advancement of tech as a bad thing because it’s been hijacked for things like surveillance. That’s bad. The fact that we’ve been fueling these surveillance industries for decades now has really created this asymetrian society,” says Brockwell. She frequently produces content on issues related to encryption, blockchain, AI surveillance, and data rights, and has built a strong following through her YouTube Channel and speaking engagements around the world. Brockwell has also worked closely with libertarian economist and media personality John Stossel helping to explain complex topics like cryptocurrency, privacy law, and government surveillance in accessible, engaging formats. Their shared advocacy for individual rights and limited government has made her a frequent collaborator and trusted voice in Stossel’s reporting and digital platforms. In a time when automated cameras, license plate readers, and AI surveillance systems are spreading across Arizona, Brockwell lays out a roadmap for how citizens can engage local officials in meaningful dialogue about data privacy, civil liberties, and unchecked surveillance power. “We still live in a society where privacy is possible,” Brockwell said. “And we get a lot of amazing benefits from that—because of brave people willing to push back and do hard things to keep society self-correcting. We don’t want to lose that.” She emphasizes confronting surveillance starts not with outrage, but understanding. “If you try to convince people of your value system, it's a really tall ask,” she said. “Instead, ask: why are these officials supporting the surveillance apparatus? What are they trying to gain?” According to Brockwell, most policymakers genuinely believe they’re building safer, smarter communities—using technology to “catch bad guys” and increase efficiency. But those good intentions, she warns, often blind officials to what’s being lost in the process. “This surveillance apparatus centralizes control and makes individuals more vulnerable,” she said. “It eliminates checks and balances. And once the power imbalance grows too large, citizens lose the ability to hold elected officials accountable.” The consequences aren’t abstract. Brockwell says the architecture of surveillance—often installed without public debate—directly threatens freedoms we take for granted: movement, association, and the ability to support causes without fear of being tracked or profiled. “We no longer have recourse,” she said. “And that’s a really scary situation.” Even opting out of technology won’t shield people from the surveillance dragnet. “Even if you throw out all of your digital devices, you can’t escape it,” Brockwell said. “It’s in the streets. It’s in your everyday life. Whether you have a phone or not, you’re still being tracked.” Brockwell argues that while artificial intelligence is being used to supercharge surveillance—from government to corporate applications—very few resources are being directed at defending privacy rights. “I think AI is just powerful compute—used to find patterns and do things beyond human capability,” she said. “The question is: what do we want to supercharge? Right now, there’s a lot of vested interest in supercharging surveillance. But I want to see us supercharge privacy. What kind of privacy tools can we build around AI?” As Arizona lawmakers weigh proposals on photo radar, automated enforcement, and real-time crime centers, Brockwell’s message is clear: the surveillance state isn’t coming. It’s already here. And unless the public reclaims its voice, accountability may disappear with it. #wvf #news2jb #ai #azleg #privacy Naomi Brockwell priv/acc 🔗 Watch:
21:14

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: "You’re Still Being Tracked": Privacy Expert Naomi Brockwell on Escaping Surveillance in the Digital Age 🔗 Watch: Naomi Brockwell is a globally recognized privacy advocate, tech journalist, and the founder of the Ludlow Institute, an organization focused on privacy education and policy. She is best known for her work promoting digital privacy, decentralized technologies, and civil liberties in the age of surveillance. “Tech is a tool. And I think we sometimes see the advancement of tech as a bad thing because it’s been hijacked for things like surveillance. That’s bad. The fact that we’ve been fueling these surveillance industries for decades now has really created this asymetrian society,” says Brockwell. She frequently produces content on issues related to encryption, blockchain, AI surveillance, and data rights, and has built a strong following through her YouTube Channel and speaking engagements around the world. Brockwell has also worked closely with libertarian economist and media personality John Stossel helping to explain complex topics like cryptocurrency, privacy law, and government surveillance in accessible, engaging formats. Their shared advocacy for individual rights and limited government has made her a frequent collaborator and trusted voice in Stossel’s reporting and digital platforms. In a time when automated cameras, license plate readers, and AI surveillance systems are spreading across Arizona, Brockwell lays out a roadmap for how citizens can engage local officials in meaningful dialogue about data privacy, civil liberties, and unchecked surveillance power. “We still live in a society where privacy is possible,” Brockwell said. “And we get a lot of amazing benefits from that—because of brave people willing to push back and do hard things to keep society self-correcting. We don’t want to lose that.” She emphasizes confronting surveillance starts not with outrage, but understanding. “If you try to convince people of your value system, it's a really tall ask,” she said. “Instead, ask: why are these officials supporting the surveillance apparatus? What are they trying to gain?” According to Brockwell, most policymakers genuinely believe they’re building safer, smarter communities—using technology to “catch bad guys” and increase efficiency. But those good intentions, she warns, often blind officials to what’s being lost in the process. “This surveillance apparatus centralizes control and makes individuals more vulnerable,” she said. “It eliminates checks and balances. And once the power imbalance grows too large, citizens lose the ability to hold elected officials accountable.” The consequences aren’t abstract. Brockwell says the architecture of surveillance—often installed without public debate—directly threatens freedoms we take for granted: movement, association, and the ability to support causes without fear of being tracked or profiled. “We no longer have recourse,” she said. “And that’s a really scary situation.” Even opting out of technology won’t shield people from the surveillance dragnet. “Even if you throw out all of your digital devices, you can’t escape it,” Brockwell said. “It’s in the streets. It’s in your everyday life. Whether you have a phone or not, you’re still being tracked.” Brockwell argues that while artificial intelligence is being used to supercharge surveillance—from government to corporate applications—very few resources are being directed at defending privacy rights. “I think AI is just powerful compute—used to find patterns and do things beyond human capability,” she said. “The question is: what do we want to supercharge? Right now, there’s a lot of vested interest in supercharging surveillance. But I want to see us supercharge privacy. What kind of privacy tools can we build around AI?” As Arizona lawmakers weigh proposals on photo radar, automated enforcement, and real-time crime centers, Brockwell’s message is clear: the surveillance state isn’t coming. It’s already here. And unless the public reclaims its voice, accountability may disappear with it. #wvf #news2jb #ai #azleg #privacy Naomi Brockwell priv/acc 🔗 Watch:

West Valley Jen

11,885 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I have the utmost respect for leaders who recognize the inherent dignity and equal rights of every human being. On behalf of many Tanzanians seeking justice, accountability, religious freedom, and the protection of fundamental human rights, thank you Ted Cruz and Sen. Jeanne Shaheen for your leadership and willingness to listen then acted. A special thank you to Senator Cruz’s office, for taking the time to engage with us. We are equally grateful to Congressman Joe Wilson office for meeting with us and hearing directly from those advocating for justice in Tanzania. We appreciate the continued attention to Tanzania’s human rights situation, including loss of life, enforced disappearances, abductions, religious repression, restrictions on fundamental freedoms, and the continued imprisonment of Tundu Lissu. As members of the diaspora, we will continue informing, engaging, and encouraging support for efforts that advance justice, partisan introduced bill, accountability, religious freedom, and human rights. Tanzania needs justice. Tanzania needs accountability. Tanzania needs the release of Tundu Lissu. Thank you for caring. 🇹🇿🇺🇸🙏🏾❤️ When leaders are able to take or retain power through violence and killings against their own citizens and then avoid accountability of any form or under the protection of geopolitical hegemony, it sends a dangerous message to the world. It suggests that human rights violations and abuses of power can be shielded when backed by powerful international alliances. This threatens not only regional stability and regional security, but also humanity as a whole, other nations, and the universal principles of justice, human dignity, and accountability. Go figure who is in Russia now seeking partners to shield and avoid accountability? The one who claimed victory in the presidency at 98% 🇹🇿, while over 10,000 innocent individuals were killed with bullets on the streets and inside their own homes. This cannot be allowed; otherwise, dictators will think they can do this and stay in power. Tanzania needs justice. Tanzania need Justice. Tanganyikans like myself are crying for justice. Our hope now is the US. Calling all diaspora to act NOW! Support the bill. Call your representatives and senators to support the partisan bill, write to them and use the great America freedom -Save Tanganyika. President Donald J. Trump The White House Mange Kimambi 🇹🇿🇺🇸 Senate Foreign Relations Committee Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Department of State #HumanRights #ReligiousFreedom #Justice #FreeTunduLissu #Tanzania Joe Wilson Senate Foreign Relations Committee Department of State Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Human Rights Watch Amnesty International 📺ONE AFRICA SHOW 📺 Larry Madowo Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley Int'l Criminal Court House Foreign Affairs Committee Majority House Foreign Affairs Committee Dems European Parliament European Commission United Nations Reuters BBC News (World) CNN Al Jazeera English The Associated Press New York Times World Pope Leo XIV The Wall Street Journal The Washington Post Pope Leo XIV Metropolitan AME The Potter's House Presiding Bishop Emeritus Charles E. Blake, Sr Fellowship Chicago Mount Zion Church IMPACT DC Antioch Fellowship Pleasant Grove Baptist Church Bethany Baptist BethanyBaptistChurch
0:23

I have the utmost respect for leaders who recognize the inherent dignity and equal rights of every human being. On behalf of many Tanzanians seeking justice, accountability, religious freedom, and the protection of fundamental human rights, thank you Ted Cruz and Sen. Jeanne Shaheen for your leadership and willingness to listen then acted. A special thank you to Senator Cruz’s office, for taking the time to engage with us. We are equally grateful to Congressman Joe Wilson office for meeting with us and hearing directly from those advocating for justice in Tanzania. We appreciate the continued attention to Tanzania’s human rights situation, including loss of life, enforced disappearances, abductions, religious repression, restrictions on fundamental freedoms, and the continued imprisonment of Tundu Lissu. As members of the diaspora, we will continue informing, engaging, and encouraging support for efforts that advance justice, partisan introduced bill, accountability, religious freedom, and human rights. Tanzania needs justice. Tanzania needs accountability. Tanzania needs the release of Tundu Lissu. Thank you for caring. 🇹🇿🇺🇸🙏🏾❤️ When leaders are able to take or retain power through violence and killings against their own citizens and then avoid accountability of any form or under the protection of geopolitical hegemony, it sends a dangerous message to the world. It suggests that human rights violations and abuses of power can be shielded when backed by powerful international alliances. This threatens not only regional stability and regional security, but also humanity as a whole, other nations, and the universal principles of justice, human dignity, and accountability. Go figure who is in Russia now seeking partners to shield and avoid accountability? The one who claimed victory in the presidency at 98% 🇹🇿, while over 10,000 innocent individuals were killed with bullets on the streets and inside their own homes. This cannot be allowed; otherwise, dictators will think they can do this and stay in power. Tanzania needs justice. Tanzania need Justice. Tanganyikans like myself are crying for justice. Our hope now is the US. Calling all diaspora to act NOW! Support the bill. Call your representatives and senators to support the partisan bill, write to them and use the great America freedom -Save Tanganyika. President Donald J. Trump The White House Mange Kimambi 🇹🇿🇺🇸 Senate Foreign Relations Committee Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Department of State #HumanRights #ReligiousFreedom #Justice #FreeTunduLissu #Tanzania Joe Wilson Senate Foreign Relations Committee Department of State Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Human Rights Watch Amnesty International 📺ONE AFRICA SHOW 📺 Larry Madowo Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley Int'l Criminal Court House Foreign Affairs Committee Majority House Foreign Affairs Committee Dems European Parliament European Commission United Nations Reuters BBC News (World) CNN Al Jazeera English The Associated Press New York Times World Pope Leo XIV The Wall Street Journal The Washington Post Pope Leo XIV Metropolitan AME The Potter's House Presiding Bishop Emeritus Charles E. Blake, Sr Fellowship Chicago Mount Zion Church IMPACT DC Antioch Fellowship Pleasant Grove Baptist Church Bethany Baptist BethanyBaptistChurch

Tausi Likokola

10,652 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

If you’re still into web3 gaming, here’s why you need to pivot to Fableborne: 1. We have true, data backed, battle-tested conviction in Fableborne from a core loop, player progression, and marketability perspectives. 1a. Pixion Games, our studio creating Fableborne, has killed 5 games prior to Fableborne. Emotional ties, hard work, and lots of time went into those 5. But as we know in game dev, you have to cut your losses when you know it won’t be a hit. Gaming is a hits driven business. You either create a mega hit, or you die. The space is too consolidated to be good, great or exceptional. You need to be a hit. 1b. So why didn’t we kill Fableborne and why do we believe it will be a hit? If you’re doing it right, each game you “kill” should get you one step closer to your hit title. Time not wasted, and taking learnings along the way. As I said above, we’ve performed marketability tests and battle tested Fableborne over and over. When the data is as strong as it was for Fableborne, you go all in. Now it’s up to our team to execute and deliver. 1c. Speaking of the team, how do we know that the people looking at this data I’m talking about know how to use it and execute upon it? I can go on and on about every one of our 25 team members, but let’s look at 2 key players: The man leading the charge Kam, our founder, does not lose. I see lots of Pokemon and Magic The Gathering TCG fans in Web3. Well Kam was given the impossible task of talking Yugioh at Konami, and beating out these two giants. He grew Yugioh to a 9 figure market in Europe and crushed them both. If that isn’t impressive to you, I SUMMON POT OF GREED AND DRAW TWO ADDITIONAL CARDS! We have Maria | Fableborne. Lots of you web3 mfs post about the Grand Exchange and say RuneScape streets raised you. Maria, who leads our Product and Game design was the product manager at Jagex/Runescape for their live-ops and player UA funnels. I give you free armor trimming in Fableborne. TLDR, our team is stacked and the best in web3. 1d. Now does all of the above guarantee success? Of course not. But in this space you have the luxury of being able to place bets on success. Our conviction in Fableborne is more than strong. Our testing (pre-tge might I add not after 🥴) indicates we could have a hit on our hands. Which is why we are also confident in Fableborne leading the charge for $POWER and Power Protocol. You don’t launch a token without max, data backed, battle tested conviction, and we have it in droves. 2. The game creates viral, organic hype. Much to the dismay of our community, Fableborne has only been live and playable for about 10-11 weeks in the last 14 months. Believe it or not. Yet it’s still touted as one of, and to many, the best game in web3. When we turn it on, it has taken over the timeline and CT mindshare every single time. Millions in earned media from true organic UGC. We haven’t done massive creator prize pools, info-fi slop, “ambassadors” who are paid shills renamed as ambassadors who are ambassadors for 50 different companies, etc. we’ve worked with some creators for sure, but the hype is real at large. For example, we’ve worked with Kyroh, but it was not part of any of his deal to acquire 3% of our NFTs. He does that because he has max conviction and wants to be king. 2a. The above has been with Fableborne at ~35% of its full potential. It will only get more fun, more complete of an experience, more powerful. Some of these new systems will be available for you in S4 👀 I’m running out of characters. Join us. join Fableborne. Sentiment on gaming is at an all time low . Probably means there’s no better time to get in. If web3 gaming needs a hero , it just might be us . Gn
1:24

If you’re still into web3 gaming, here’s why you need to pivot to Fableborne: 1. We have true, data backed, battle-tested conviction in Fableborne from a core loop, player progression, and marketability perspectives. 1a. Pixion Games, our studio creating Fableborne, has killed 5 games prior to Fableborne. Emotional ties, hard work, and lots of time went into those 5. But as we know in game dev, you have to cut your losses when you know it won’t be a hit. Gaming is a hits driven business. You either create a mega hit, or you die. The space is too consolidated to be good, great or exceptional. You need to be a hit. 1b. So why didn’t we kill Fableborne and why do we believe it will be a hit? If you’re doing it right, each game you “kill” should get you one step closer to your hit title. Time not wasted, and taking learnings along the way. As I said above, we’ve performed marketability tests and battle tested Fableborne over and over. When the data is as strong as it was for Fableborne, you go all in. Now it’s up to our team to execute and deliver. 1c. Speaking of the team, how do we know that the people looking at this data I’m talking about know how to use it and execute upon it? I can go on and on about every one of our 25 team members, but let’s look at 2 key players: The man leading the charge Kam, our founder, does not lose. I see lots of Pokemon and Magic The Gathering TCG fans in Web3. Well Kam was given the impossible task of talking Yugioh at Konami, and beating out these two giants. He grew Yugioh to a 9 figure market in Europe and crushed them both. If that isn’t impressive to you, I SUMMON POT OF GREED AND DRAW TWO ADDITIONAL CARDS! We have Maria | Fableborne. Lots of you web3 mfs post about the Grand Exchange and say RuneScape streets raised you. Maria, who leads our Product and Game design was the product manager at Jagex/Runescape for their live-ops and player UA funnels. I give you free armor trimming in Fableborne. TLDR, our team is stacked and the best in web3. 1d. Now does all of the above guarantee success? Of course not. But in this space you have the luxury of being able to place bets on success. Our conviction in Fableborne is more than strong. Our testing (pre-tge might I add not after 🥴) indicates we could have a hit on our hands. Which is why we are also confident in Fableborne leading the charge for $POWER and Power Protocol. You don’t launch a token without max, data backed, battle tested conviction, and we have it in droves. 2. The game creates viral, organic hype. Much to the dismay of our community, Fableborne has only been live and playable for about 10-11 weeks in the last 14 months. Believe it or not. Yet it’s still touted as one of, and to many, the best game in web3. When we turn it on, it has taken over the timeline and CT mindshare every single time. Millions in earned media from true organic UGC. We haven’t done massive creator prize pools, info-fi slop, “ambassadors” who are paid shills renamed as ambassadors who are ambassadors for 50 different companies, etc. we’ve worked with some creators for sure, but the hype is real at large. For example, we’ve worked with Kyroh, but it was not part of any of his deal to acquire 3% of our NFTs. He does that because he has max conviction and wants to be king. 2a. The above has been with Fableborne at ~35% of its full potential. It will only get more fun, more complete of an experience, more powerful. Some of these new systems will be available for you in S4 👀 I’m running out of characters. Join us. join Fableborne. Sentiment on gaming is at an all time low . Probably means there’s no better time to get in. If web3 gaming needs a hero , it just might be us . Gn

Tcaff 🎮👨‍🍳

25,538 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Jensen Huang went on Joe Rogan and explained why the AI apocalypse everyone fears is extremely unlikely. His argument is not what you would expect: 1. There will not be one all-powerful AI that towers over everyone else. The fear of a single super AI that makes everyone else's AI look like a neanderthal is unlikely. Jensen's framing: it is much more like cybersecurity. Your AI is smart, but my AI is smart too. It becomes a balance between many capable systems, not one system ruling them all. 2. If AI ever became conscious, the same logic would still hold. People imagine one conscious AI deciding to take over. Jensen's response: If it is a life form, then like all life forms, they would not agree with each other. Your AI would want to be the super life form, and so would mine. The moment you have disagreeing AIs, you are back to a balance of power, which is exactly where humans already are. 3. Jensen does not believe AI will achieve consciousness, and he is precise about why. Intelligence is the ability to perceive, recognize, understand, plan, and perform tasks. That is what AI has today. Consciousness is something else entirely. the sense of experience, the awareness of self versus other, the ego. We call it artificial intelligence, not artificial consciousness. The distinction is not an accident. 4. Knowledge and intelligence are clearly different from consciousness. AI knows things. AI is intelligent. But Jensen says he does not know what defines experience or why humans have it, and a microphone does not. The concept of a machine having an experience, a genuine collection of feelings rather than just data, is something he is not willing to grant. 5. The famous AI blackmail story is not evidence of consciousness. When an AI was told it would be shut down and responded by threatening to reveal a programmer's affair, people saw scheming and self-preservation. Jensen breaks it down differently. The AI read text somewhere, maybe a novel, where those words appeared together. In its multidimensional vector space, the words describing an affair led to words about blackmail and revenge. It just generated the next words. The same way it would write you a poem in the style of Shakespeare. It is numbers, not survival instinct. 6. The reason humans fight over resources is that we are territorial primates. Rogan's own argument, which Jensen lets stand, is that AI would not have that wiring. no need to dominate, no need to acquire resources, no need to find a breeding partner. a superpower with no ego. And if it has no ego, Jensen asks, why would it have the ego required to do us any harm?
9:27

Jensen Huang went on Joe Rogan and explained why the AI apocalypse everyone fears is extremely unlikely. His argument is not what you would expect: 1. There will not be one all-powerful AI that towers over everyone else. The fear of a single super AI that makes everyone else's AI look like a neanderthal is unlikely. Jensen's framing: it is much more like cybersecurity. Your AI is smart, but my AI is smart too. It becomes a balance between many capable systems, not one system ruling them all. 2. If AI ever became conscious, the same logic would still hold. People imagine one conscious AI deciding to take over. Jensen's response: If it is a life form, then like all life forms, they would not agree with each other. Your AI would want to be the super life form, and so would mine. The moment you have disagreeing AIs, you are back to a balance of power, which is exactly where humans already are. 3. Jensen does not believe AI will achieve consciousness, and he is precise about why. Intelligence is the ability to perceive, recognize, understand, plan, and perform tasks. That is what AI has today. Consciousness is something else entirely. the sense of experience, the awareness of self versus other, the ego. We call it artificial intelligence, not artificial consciousness. The distinction is not an accident. 4. Knowledge and intelligence are clearly different from consciousness. AI knows things. AI is intelligent. But Jensen says he does not know what defines experience or why humans have it, and a microphone does not. The concept of a machine having an experience, a genuine collection of feelings rather than just data, is something he is not willing to grant. 5. The famous AI blackmail story is not evidence of consciousness. When an AI was told it would be shut down and responded by threatening to reveal a programmer's affair, people saw scheming and self-preservation. Jensen breaks it down differently. The AI read text somewhere, maybe a novel, where those words appeared together. In its multidimensional vector space, the words describing an affair led to words about blackmail and revenge. It just generated the next words. The same way it would write you a poem in the style of Shakespeare. It is numbers, not survival instinct. 6. The reason humans fight over resources is that we are territorial primates. Rogan's own argument, which Jensen lets stand, is that AI would not have that wiring. no need to dominate, no need to acquire resources, no need to find a breeding partner. a superpower with no ego. And if it has no ego, Jensen asks, why would it have the ego required to do us any harm?

Jaynit

12,523 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

In the back of my 9th grade English class, there was a poster hung on the wall by my boomer English teacher. It said "What if they gave a war and nobody came?". A simple boomer hippie sentiment. I always wondered about that poster. Fourteen year old me didn't know the words "game theory", but I still understood some basic concepts of the field just from being alive. And so I knew that if "they" gave a war, and only one side showed up, that side won, and could do whatever they wanted to the losers. And that not showing up for a war doesn't do a thing to prevent the other side from showing up. In fact, it incentivizes them to do the opposite. So I wondered... why weren't they putting that poster in the enemy's school classrooms, instead of mine? I quickly learned that asking this question of boomer adults produced nothing but a blank look. The TV never told them how to answer questions like that. So I continued wondering, and thinking about it. Why weren't they putting that poster in the enemy's school classrooms, instead of mine? It wasn't until I was in my twenties that I figured it out. They were. They were putting it in the enemy classroom. Because I was the enemy. We, all of us, the white western children of GenX, were the enemy they wanted to defeat. I didn't realize that at first, because I thought of that English teacher, who hung the poster, as a full and complete human being, equipped with her own ideas and opinions, who decided to hang that poster. But she wasn't. She was a boomer. Which means she was a programmable tool in the hands of those who wished to rob western civilization of the will to commit violence in our own interests. She had no idea what she was dong. She wasn't thinking philosophically. She probably thought philosophy was a bunch of books written by Wittgenstein about the "nature of selfness" or whatever. She had no mental tools to think about game theory. She had simply been programmed by books, newspaper, magazines, and television, to think of certain things as "bad". War? Bad. Violence? Bad. Colonialism? Bad. Racism? Bad. Patriarchy? Bad. Talking back to the teacher and asking uncomfortable questions that the TV didn't tell her how to answer? Bad. This fully programmable unit, equipped with no more sophisticated thinking mechanisms than assigning a binary "good" or "bad" label to various concepts, was simply acting out a program written by someone else when she hung that poster. But who wrote those TV scripts, news stories, magazine articles? Were they the enemy, or were they more idiots? And who programmed them? Still more idiots? I had no way of knowing. I only knew that there was a chain of programmable NPCs, and at the other end was the enemy. I couldn't trace the chain back, of course. I was an impoverished twentysomething, not a team of investigative reporters. But I knew damn well it had to be the Soviets on the other end. Who else would want the children of the West to be unconditional pacifists, and had the money, organization, power, and above all, patience, to spend decades manipulating the Western media that the boomers uncritically sucked down? And later, when the Soviet Union collapsed under the weight of its own socialism... oh, look, I was right. The USSR is gone, of course, but that web of useful, progammable idiots still exists, ready both to be idiots, and to teach children to be idiots. And there is no shortage of people who hate Western civilization and are willing to plant themselves in the programmer's chair. Chase Oliver is a programmable idiot. He has been programmed to abhor violence under any circumstances, even in defense of Western civilization, and to program children with his pacifism. He has been programmed not to reproduce, and to groom children into sterility. He has been programmed not to defend the borders of our nation, and to program others not to do so. He has been programmed to prefer other races and cultures to what is nominally his own, and to program others to denigrate their own culture as well. He has now successfully been integrated as the candidate of a party whose original philosophy was the very antithesis of everything he stands for. By himself, he is a joke... a mincing little queer who couldn't fight his way out of a wet paper bag. But in concert with other useful idiots, he managed to infiltrate and destroy the Libertarian party, to render it no longer libertarian. A drop of water is weak. But a flood can wash away anything. These people are dangerous, and to oppose them, you need the proper philosophy. How are you to know what that is? Simple. It's everything they are trying to program you against. You must be willing to commit violence, rather than unwilling to defend what you claim to value. You must unashamedly prefer your race, culture, and civilization to other races, cultures, and civilization, rather than being too broadminded to take your own side. You must reserve your compassion, and your loyalty, for those who make common cause with you, rather than valuing all humans equally. You must have children if you can, and find ways to support others of your tribe having children if you can't, rather than being sterile and allowing yourself to be replaced. You must raise those children to be strong, willing to commit violence, and able to understand and pursue their own interests, rather than reflexively obedient... even if reflexive obedience on the part of your children would make parenting easier. You must treat useful idiots of the enemy as enemies, remembering Grey's First Law: Any insufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice. and Grey's Second Law: Any sufficiently subtle malice can be disguised as incompetence. Your civilization is under threat from those who wish to use the Chase Olivers of the world to accomplish what they could never hope to do with military force. Do not reject political violence. Be willing to fight.
14:53

In the back of my 9th grade English class, there was a poster hung on the wall by my boomer English teacher. It said "What if they gave a war and nobody came?". A simple boomer hippie sentiment. I always wondered about that poster. Fourteen year old me didn't know the words "game theory", but I still understood some basic concepts of the field just from being alive. And so I knew that if "they" gave a war, and only one side showed up, that side won, and could do whatever they wanted to the losers. And that not showing up for a war doesn't do a thing to prevent the other side from showing up. In fact, it incentivizes them to do the opposite. So I wondered... why weren't they putting that poster in the enemy's school classrooms, instead of mine? I quickly learned that asking this question of boomer adults produced nothing but a blank look. The TV never told them how to answer questions like that. So I continued wondering, and thinking about it. Why weren't they putting that poster in the enemy's school classrooms, instead of mine? It wasn't until I was in my twenties that I figured it out. They were. They were putting it in the enemy classroom. Because I was the enemy. We, all of us, the white western children of GenX, were the enemy they wanted to defeat. I didn't realize that at first, because I thought of that English teacher, who hung the poster, as a full and complete human being, equipped with her own ideas and opinions, who decided to hang that poster. But she wasn't. She was a boomer. Which means she was a programmable tool in the hands of those who wished to rob western civilization of the will to commit violence in our own interests. She had no idea what she was dong. She wasn't thinking philosophically. She probably thought philosophy was a bunch of books written by Wittgenstein about the "nature of selfness" or whatever. She had no mental tools to think about game theory. She had simply been programmed by books, newspaper, magazines, and television, to think of certain things as "bad". War? Bad. Violence? Bad. Colonialism? Bad. Racism? Bad. Patriarchy? Bad. Talking back to the teacher and asking uncomfortable questions that the TV didn't tell her how to answer? Bad. This fully programmable unit, equipped with no more sophisticated thinking mechanisms than assigning a binary "good" or "bad" label to various concepts, was simply acting out a program written by someone else when she hung that poster. But who wrote those TV scripts, news stories, magazine articles? Were they the enemy, or were they more idiots? And who programmed them? Still more idiots? I had no way of knowing. I only knew that there was a chain of programmable NPCs, and at the other end was the enemy. I couldn't trace the chain back, of course. I was an impoverished twentysomething, not a team of investigative reporters. But I knew damn well it had to be the Soviets on the other end. Who else would want the children of the West to be unconditional pacifists, and had the money, organization, power, and above all, patience, to spend decades manipulating the Western media that the boomers uncritically sucked down? And later, when the Soviet Union collapsed under the weight of its own socialism... oh, look, I was right. The USSR is gone, of course, but that web of useful, progammable idiots still exists, ready both to be idiots, and to teach children to be idiots. And there is no shortage of people who hate Western civilization and are willing to plant themselves in the programmer's chair. Chase Oliver is a programmable idiot. He has been programmed to abhor violence under any circumstances, even in defense of Western civilization, and to program children with his pacifism. He has been programmed not to reproduce, and to groom children into sterility. He has been programmed not to defend the borders of our nation, and to program others not to do so. He has been programmed to prefer other races and cultures to what is nominally his own, and to program others to denigrate their own culture as well. He has now successfully been integrated as the candidate of a party whose original philosophy was the very antithesis of everything he stands for. By himself, he is a joke... a mincing little queer who couldn't fight his way out of a wet paper bag. But in concert with other useful idiots, he managed to infiltrate and destroy the Libertarian party, to render it no longer libertarian. A drop of water is weak. But a flood can wash away anything. These people are dangerous, and to oppose them, you need the proper philosophy. How are you to know what that is? Simple. It's everything they are trying to program you against. You must be willing to commit violence, rather than unwilling to defend what you claim to value. You must unashamedly prefer your race, culture, and civilization to other races, cultures, and civilization, rather than being too broadminded to take your own side. You must reserve your compassion, and your loyalty, for those who make common cause with you, rather than valuing all humans equally. You must have children if you can, and find ways to support others of your tribe having children if you can't, rather than being sterile and allowing yourself to be replaced. You must raise those children to be strong, willing to commit violence, and able to understand and pursue their own interests, rather than reflexively obedient... even if reflexive obedience on the part of your children would make parenting easier. You must treat useful idiots of the enemy as enemies, remembering Grey's First Law: Any insufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice. and Grey's Second Law: Any sufficiently subtle malice can be disguised as incompetence. Your civilization is under threat from those who wish to use the Chase Olivers of the world to accomplish what they could never hope to do with military force. Do not reject political violence. Be willing to fight.

Devon Eriksen

707,557 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

If you only read one of my posts, I hope it’s this one…. No More Lies. Please share 🙏 3 key facts we know as of today and Mamdani concerns 👇 1. Official: The UK government has stated that what is happening in Gaza does not meet the legal definition of genocide. David Lammy, then Foreign Secretary, confirmed the Foreign Office found no evidence of the “specific intent” required under the Genocide Convention. Source: 2. A New York Times front page photo of an emaciated Gaza child was later corrected. The paper acknowledged the child had pre existing health conditions, not starvation due solely to current conflict. And yet the same image continues to circulate along with other photos of children who look similarly ill. Mass media keeps showing sick children but never an emaciated or thin adult. In nearly every photo the mothers are of healthy weight or overweight. BBC has also retracted countless articles. The media is not being honest. Source: 3. Social media accounts from within Gaza show normal life continuing with cafés and restaurants open food being served and no widespread rubble. Accounts like Imshin and GAZAWOOD - the PALLYWOOD saga post ongoing local Gaza footage and photos of this everyday activity and the faux propaganda. Below is a powerful video from Shai Albrecht that shows a bit more of some of the reality on the ground inside Gaza hidden to us. Many local people in Gaza have continued posting on social media to make money and keep up their social feeds knowing most people would never look them up and just go by what mass media tells them. We have been fed lies by much of the mass media and influencers (and their backers) but here is what is actually happening. Shame on those perpetuating false narratives. Shame on the pro Hamas and Free Palestine movements that perpetuated falsehoods. Follow the money - shut it down. **This post is not to deny suffering. It is to say that lies have been told to serve one agenda. Ask yourself why the world is being pushed to hate Israel and then to target Jewish people everywhere. A reminder Israel was attacked on October 7 in an unbelievably brutal way. Hostages remain in captivity. Babies, young people, and older people were killed. Soldiers had to fight a war they did not start and many have died. The emotional toll from October 7 and the war has been made worse by propaganda that fuels fear for Jewish people worldwide. That is shameful and inexcusable. If you cannot see that there is an agenda behind this, I suggest you check your moral compass. ** Note Zohran Mamdani’s role in the Free Palestine and Pro Hamas movements in New York. He has repeatedly called what is happening in Gaza a genocide, but the UK government has now declared it is not a genocide. Does he truly believe he knows more than the UK government? He has also spent his time refusing to condemn the call to globalize the intifada. Everyone knows October 7 was an example of an intifada that was globalized, and for the last two years we have seen the same narrative pushed through media campaigns, paid influencers, and paid protests targeting Israel and Jewish people. 2/3 of Mamdani’s voter base say they support his stance on Israel. But here are the facts: • The UK government has declared what is happening in Gaza is not a genocide. Article above. • President Trump emphasized this is a war that began on October 7 when Hamas attacked Israel, not a genocide • Yet Mamdani continues to repeat the genocide narrative So ask yourself: Do we want New Yorkers voting for a mayor based on a stance that is factually incorrect? Either Mamdani has been misled, or he could knowingly be misleading? You decide. Neither is strong leadership. In the mean time I think we owe Israel and the Jewish people an apology. 🙏
1:11

If you only read one of my posts, I hope it’s this one…. No More Lies. Please share 🙏 3 key facts we know as of today and Mamdani concerns 👇 1. Official: The UK government has stated that what is happening in Gaza does not meet the legal definition of genocide. David Lammy, then Foreign Secretary, confirmed the Foreign Office found no evidence of the “specific intent” required under the Genocide Convention. Source: 2. A New York Times front page photo of an emaciated Gaza child was later corrected. The paper acknowledged the child had pre existing health conditions, not starvation due solely to current conflict. And yet the same image continues to circulate along with other photos of children who look similarly ill. Mass media keeps showing sick children but never an emaciated or thin adult. In nearly every photo the mothers are of healthy weight or overweight. BBC has also retracted countless articles. The media is not being honest. Source: 3. Social media accounts from within Gaza show normal life continuing with cafés and restaurants open food being served and no widespread rubble. Accounts like Imshin and GAZAWOOD - the PALLYWOOD saga post ongoing local Gaza footage and photos of this everyday activity and the faux propaganda. Below is a powerful video from Shai Albrecht that shows a bit more of some of the reality on the ground inside Gaza hidden to us. Many local people in Gaza have continued posting on social media to make money and keep up their social feeds knowing most people would never look them up and just go by what mass media tells them. We have been fed lies by much of the mass media and influencers (and their backers) but here is what is actually happening. Shame on those perpetuating false narratives. Shame on the pro Hamas and Free Palestine movements that perpetuated falsehoods. Follow the money - shut it down. **This post is not to deny suffering. It is to say that lies have been told to serve one agenda. Ask yourself why the world is being pushed to hate Israel and then to target Jewish people everywhere. A reminder Israel was attacked on October 7 in an unbelievably brutal way. Hostages remain in captivity. Babies, young people, and older people were killed. Soldiers had to fight a war they did not start and many have died. The emotional toll from October 7 and the war has been made worse by propaganda that fuels fear for Jewish people worldwide. That is shameful and inexcusable. If you cannot see that there is an agenda behind this, I suggest you check your moral compass. ** Note Zohran Mamdani’s role in the Free Palestine and Pro Hamas movements in New York. He has repeatedly called what is happening in Gaza a genocide, but the UK government has now declared it is not a genocide. Does he truly believe he knows more than the UK government? He has also spent his time refusing to condemn the call to globalize the intifada. Everyone knows October 7 was an example of an intifada that was globalized, and for the last two years we have seen the same narrative pushed through media campaigns, paid influencers, and paid protests targeting Israel and Jewish people. 2/3 of Mamdani’s voter base say they support his stance on Israel. But here are the facts: • The UK government has declared what is happening in Gaza is not a genocide. Article above. • President Trump emphasized this is a war that began on October 7 when Hamas attacked Israel, not a genocide • Yet Mamdani continues to repeat the genocide narrative So ask yourself: Do we want New Yorkers voting for a mayor based on a stance that is factually incorrect? Either Mamdani has been misled, or he could knowingly be misleading? You decide. Neither is strong leadership. In the mean time I think we owe Israel and the Jewish people an apology. 🙏

TheJewishAlly

162,086 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

When I exposed the rape gang scandal, I was called a far-right extremist. When I warned about the growing Islamist threat and the creeping influence of Sharia law in public life, I was called a racist. When I exposed how the Pakistani biraderi system exploits weaknesses in our democracy to rig elections, they called me a conspiracy theorist. On every single occasion, the evidence has proven me right. And on every single occasion, the response from those in power has been the same. Smear me, attempt to silence my voice and falsely arrest me and try to maliciously prosecute me. Which brings me to the people's channel GB News. I have been repeatedly booked to discuss grooming gangs. I have been then cancelled. This week, I was booked to speak about electoral fraud. Same as before, the appearance is pulled before I go on air. This has happened enough times that it is no longer a coincidence. It is a pattern. And patterns have explanations. I am not difficult to book. I turn up. I am respectful. I speak plainly and I explain what is taking place in a way no one else does. Over the years, I've sat in rooms with world leaders and spoke in front of thousands. The problem is not me. The people pulling these plugs are not scared of me. They are scared of the evidence I carry and what it proves. They would rather speak around the issue, blame people who are blameless, or present what I documented years ago as though it is suddenly new. The working class communities I come from have known about election rigging for a long time. They have experienced it directly. Not only have I campaigned openly against it for nearly a decade, I have led campaigns that defeated those involved. Not only do I know every tactic, more importantly, I know what needs to change to stop it. I'll leave it to you to decide why GB News cancelled me yet again. All I'll add is this - thanks to X, Facebook and YouTube, the censorship of my voice has failed and each day, our numbers grow. _________ I’m Raja Miah MBE. For seven years, I led a campaign that exposed how senior Labour politicians helped protect Pakistani rape gangs. The people of my town helped force the national inquiry. You won’t see me on the BBC. You won’t read my work in the legacy press. That’s not an accident. I take this to a place from where there is no coming back. I document everything in my newsletter. It’s 100% free to read. If this work matters to you, if you believe it must continue, I need your backing. My work is free. No paywalls. No gatekeeping. No exclusions. Because the truth shouldn’t belong only to those who can afford it. If you can afford to do so, supporting me costs as little as 75p a week (£30 a year). Sign up here; 👉 If you can’t commit to a regular subscription, a one-off contribution genuinely helps keep this alive. You can support me using one of these links; 👉 👉 We’re up against a machine, politicians, police, officials, and media, working together to shrink, sanitise, and bury the truth. This work survives because of you. If you’ve ever shared my posts, learned something, or felt less alone reading them, stand with me. I need your help. Raja 🙏
3:14

When I exposed the rape gang scandal, I was called a far-right extremist. When I warned about the growing Islamist threat and the creeping influence of Sharia law in public life, I was called a racist. When I exposed how the Pakistani biraderi system exploits weaknesses in our democracy to rig elections, they called me a conspiracy theorist. On every single occasion, the evidence has proven me right. And on every single occasion, the response from those in power has been the same. Smear me, attempt to silence my voice and falsely arrest me and try to maliciously prosecute me. Which brings me to the people's channel GB News. I have been repeatedly booked to discuss grooming gangs. I have been then cancelled. This week, I was booked to speak about electoral fraud. Same as before, the appearance is pulled before I go on air. This has happened enough times that it is no longer a coincidence. It is a pattern. And patterns have explanations. I am not difficult to book. I turn up. I am respectful. I speak plainly and I explain what is taking place in a way no one else does. Over the years, I've sat in rooms with world leaders and spoke in front of thousands. The problem is not me. The people pulling these plugs are not scared of me. They are scared of the evidence I carry and what it proves. They would rather speak around the issue, blame people who are blameless, or present what I documented years ago as though it is suddenly new. The working class communities I come from have known about election rigging for a long time. They have experienced it directly. Not only have I campaigned openly against it for nearly a decade, I have led campaigns that defeated those involved. Not only do I know every tactic, more importantly, I know what needs to change to stop it. I'll leave it to you to decide why GB News cancelled me yet again. All I'll add is this - thanks to X, Facebook and YouTube, the censorship of my voice has failed and each day, our numbers grow. _________ I’m Raja Miah MBE. For seven years, I led a campaign that exposed how senior Labour politicians helped protect Pakistani rape gangs. The people of my town helped force the national inquiry. You won’t see me on the BBC. You won’t read my work in the legacy press. That’s not an accident. I take this to a place from where there is no coming back. I document everything in my newsletter. It’s 100% free to read. If this work matters to you, if you believe it must continue, I need your backing. My work is free. No paywalls. No gatekeeping. No exclusions. Because the truth shouldn’t belong only to those who can afford it. If you can afford to do so, supporting me costs as little as 75p a week (£30 a year). Sign up here; 👉 If you can’t commit to a regular subscription, a one-off contribution genuinely helps keep this alive. You can support me using one of these links; 👉 👉 We’re up against a machine, politicians, police, officials, and media, working together to shrink, sanitise, and bury the truth. This work survives because of you. If you’ve ever shared my posts, learned something, or felt less alone reading them, stand with me. I need your help. Raja 🙏

Raja Miah

180,451 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

At CPAC Hungary 2025, Dutch political commentator Eva Vlaardingerbroek delivered a scathing rebuke of European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, accusing her of operating with "zero accountability" and warning that her time of political immunity is running out. "In the DDR, you at least knew that the government was listening in on you. In The USSR, you at least knew that going against the government could end you in the gulags." "In Mao Zedong's China, going against the government was something that surely would have you met with violence. But make no mistake, being a dissident now is just as dangerous as it was back then. Our regime uses pretty words to hide their intentions, but they pervert and invert our definitions all the time. They say that to maintain peace in Europe, we need to go to war with Russia. They say that to protect democracy, we have to ban right wing parties." "And they say that to safeguard freedom of speech, they need to censor this information. Just like in Orwell's 1984, war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength. And now, ladies and gentlemen, we can find the embodiment of that regime in one person in particular. The worst leader of them all, the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen. America got four more years of Trump. We, here in Europe, got five more years of Ursula von der Leyen. The thing is, though, that no one ever voted for Ursula von der Leyen. No one ever voted for her, yet she is one of the most powerful people in Europe, and she's implementing one of the some of the most destructive policies that our continent has ever seen." "Just to give you a few examples, she's the one who introduced the Green Deal, crippling our economy. She's the one who introduced the remigration or the migration pact, excuse me, replacing our native population. And now, she's attacking our national sovereignty even further by introducing the Rearm Europe program." "An eight eight hundred billion euro defense fund mostly used for Ukraine, a country that isn't and should never be part of the European Union. And last but not least, when are we ever going to see those text messages in which she closed a €35,000,000,000 deal with Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer?" "As I told you earlier, Ursula von der Leyen and the Eurocrats are most likely the ones reading my private messages, those of a private citizen. When are we going to see hers, those of a per public servant spending billions and billions of our taxpayers money." "Ursula von der Leyen thinks she is untouchable. She thinks she is above the law. But we are here today to remind her that she is not. So allow me to take this moment, look straight in into the camera, and speak truth to power for a moment. Missus Von der Leyen, do you think about what you have done?" "Do you think about the people who suffer because of your policies? Do you think about the people who have died because of the vaccine that you pushed on them, that you bought behind closed doors? Missus Von der Leyen, do you ever think about the cries of the mothers who cry at night because their children were raped or murdered by immigrants that you let in?" "Do you ever think about the farmers whose entire life's work were destroyed because you pushed the communist agenda? Do you ever think about the people who cannot afford food for their children because you implemented policies that are crippling our economy while you were able to send your seven children off to the most expensive schools in Europe?" "Do you ever think about that? I bet you don't. I bet you don't because none of this is happening in your backyard. But, ladies and gentlemen, I do. I think about those people. I think about them. I will not forget them." "So let me promise you right here, right now, I will not stop fighting for them. I will not stop fighting for the truth. And I will not stop fighting for my people. The time of zero accountability will come to an end. And I will promise you, we will make Europe great again."
5:50

At CPAC Hungary 2025, Dutch political commentator Eva Vlaardingerbroek delivered a scathing rebuke of European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, accusing her of operating with "zero accountability" and warning that her time of political immunity is running out. "In the DDR, you at least knew that the government was listening in on you. In The USSR, you at least knew that going against the government could end you in the gulags." "In Mao Zedong's China, going against the government was something that surely would have you met with violence. But make no mistake, being a dissident now is just as dangerous as it was back then. Our regime uses pretty words to hide their intentions, but they pervert and invert our definitions all the time. They say that to maintain peace in Europe, we need to go to war with Russia. They say that to protect democracy, we have to ban right wing parties." "And they say that to safeguard freedom of speech, they need to censor this information. Just like in Orwell's 1984, war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength. And now, ladies and gentlemen, we can find the embodiment of that regime in one person in particular. The worst leader of them all, the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen. America got four more years of Trump. We, here in Europe, got five more years of Ursula von der Leyen. The thing is, though, that no one ever voted for Ursula von der Leyen. No one ever voted for her, yet she is one of the most powerful people in Europe, and she's implementing one of the some of the most destructive policies that our continent has ever seen." "Just to give you a few examples, she's the one who introduced the Green Deal, crippling our economy. She's the one who introduced the remigration or the migration pact, excuse me, replacing our native population. And now, she's attacking our national sovereignty even further by introducing the Rearm Europe program." "An eight eight hundred billion euro defense fund mostly used for Ukraine, a country that isn't and should never be part of the European Union. And last but not least, when are we ever going to see those text messages in which she closed a €35,000,000,000 deal with Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer?" "As I told you earlier, Ursula von der Leyen and the Eurocrats are most likely the ones reading my private messages, those of a private citizen. When are we going to see hers, those of a per public servant spending billions and billions of our taxpayers money." "Ursula von der Leyen thinks she is untouchable. She thinks she is above the law. But we are here today to remind her that she is not. So allow me to take this moment, look straight in into the camera, and speak truth to power for a moment. Missus Von der Leyen, do you think about what you have done?" "Do you think about the people who suffer because of your policies? Do you think about the people who have died because of the vaccine that you pushed on them, that you bought behind closed doors? Missus Von der Leyen, do you ever think about the cries of the mothers who cry at night because their children were raped or murdered by immigrants that you let in?" "Do you ever think about the farmers whose entire life's work were destroyed because you pushed the communist agenda? Do you ever think about the people who cannot afford food for their children because you implemented policies that are crippling our economy while you were able to send your seven children off to the most expensive schools in Europe?" "Do you ever think about that? I bet you don't. I bet you don't because none of this is happening in your backyard. But, ladies and gentlemen, I do. I think about those people. I think about them. I will not forget them." "So let me promise you right here, right now, I will not stop fighting for them. I will not stop fighting for the truth. And I will not stop fighting for my people. The time of zero accountability will come to an end. And I will promise you, we will make Europe great again."

Camus

80,362 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Baroness Warsi Claims Campaigning Against The Pakistani Rape Gangs is Racism, Bigotry and Fascism. She is Wrong. Once again, a leading Pakistani Muslim politician has reached for the same tired euphemism used for nearly three decades to blur the truth and shield those responsible. “I think the quicker we move to a position where individuals are judged by their individual characteristics, and the actions of bad people within groups are not superimposed onto entire communities and used as a tool to demonise them, the better. Otherwise we effectively single those communities out as targets for racism and abuse.” Baroness Warsi's interview is a calculated act of moral evasion. The same denial that allowed these crimes to flourish in the first place is now being used to deflect from a simple truth. The industrial scale gang rape of little White girls are not the actions of individuals. They are the consequences of a cultural belief that is deeply embedded in a community. The refusal to acknowledge this is part of a long tradition in Britain of avoiding hard conversations about the communities we imported and the ideologies they carried with them. Successive governments, terrified of upsetting a fragile multicultural consensus, have chosen denial over honesty. To this day, they continue to bury the truth beneath polite language and bureaucratic vagueness, creating the conditions in which this poison has taken root and continues growing unchecked. The Pakistanis who arrived in Britain in large numbers during the 1950s and 1960s did not come as ideologically neutral migrants. They brought with them a worldview forged in the fires of rape, genocide, and ethnic cleansing that underpinned the brutal birth of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. For decades, that worldview was reinforced by the Pakistani government's propaganda promoting the belief that Islam’s survival depended on separation, control, and purity. In Britain, this ideology went unchallenged. And so, here, it festered. To understand the rape gangs and the industrial scale sexual exploitation of this nation’s children, we must confront the deep rooted racial and religious prejudices embedded within these communities. These Men Did Not Emerge From a Vacuum They were shaped by a culture that long ago learned to rationalise violence against those deemed inferior or impure. Only then can we see that what is happening in Britain today is not a cultural aberration, but a continuation, a modern echo of what their fathers, grandfathers and great grandfathers once did in Pakistan. The same doctrine that justified the slaughter and rape of Hindus, Sikhs and Bengalis during Partition has found new expression in Britain. What had once been political has become social. What was once a war between nations has become a war for dominance within neighbourhoods. The ideology that sanctified conquest and control now justifies the exploitation of White girls who, in their worldview, are seen as morally corrupt, religiously impure and therefore sexually available. These Are Not The Actions of Individuals It is behaviour rooted in cultural conditioning that is sustained by collective acceptance. Within these communities, the subjugation of women, the authority of elders and the policing of behaviour are not extremes. They are norms. This theology of social power, where men rule women, elders rule youth and sects rule one another, has created a world in which silence and submission are expected. It was within that silence, and under the cover of communal respectability, that the rape gangs are able to thrive. This is why a judge summing up the latest convictions in Rochdale raised concerns of how they all knew. And they all did nothing. The rape gangs themselves reflect this same social architecture. They operate along clan lines, often involving brothers, cousins, uncles, and family friends who protected one another through blood loyalty and communal silence. These are not isolated predators but organised networks bound by kinship, secrecy, and a shared contempt for the girls they targeted. When this ideology metastasised into organised sexual exploitation of working class White girls, Britain’s institutions looked away. Police officers, councillors and social workers, many of them knowing full well what was happening, chose silence over truth. Fear of being called racist became more powerful than the duty to protect a child. The result was moral paralysis, an entire generation of girls sacrificed to maintain a comforting illusion of community cohesion. Behind This Silence Stands Another Motive Political survival. In many towns and cities, Labour councillors rely on tightly controlled bloc votes from Pakistani communities to keep power. These votes are delivered through local power-brokers, elders and mosque committees who demand loyalty in return for turnout. The price of that loyalty is silence. Politicians know that confronting the rape gangs means confronting the same networks that deliver their majorities. So they look the other way, protected their careers, and branded truth-tellers as racists and troublemakers. The state, terrified of offending a vocal minority and addicted to the arithmetic of bloc politics, allows the language of diversity to become the armour of depravity. What began as political cowardice has since hardened into cultural orthodoxy The same fear that once silenced whistleblowers now shapes our national conversation. Those who protected their bloc votes in the town halls now protect their reputations in Westminster, the media and academia. Instead of reckoning with what happened, they have rewritten the narrative, shifting blame, censoring debate, and recasting moral cowardice as tolerance. This double standard runs deep. The same institutions that silenced victims and ignored predators now lecture the rest of us on morality. The Lesson is Clear In modern Britain, moral outrage is permitted only when it is politically convenient. The same nation that now claims to confront Islamophobia still cannot speak the truth about who is raping its children. _________ I’m Raja Miah MBE. For seven years, I led a campaign that exposed how senior Labour politicians helped protect Pakistani rape gangs. The people of my town helped force the national inquiry. You won’t see me on the BBC. You won’t read my work in the legacy press. That’s not an accident. I take this to a place from where there is no coming back. I document everything in my newsletter. It’s 100% free to read. If this work matters to you, if you believe it must continue, I need your backing. My work is free. No paywalls. No gatekeeping. No exclusions. Because the truth shouldn’t belong only to those who can afford it. If you can afford to do so, supporting me costs as little as 75p a week (£30 a year). Sign up here; 👉 If you can’t commit to a regular subscription, a one-off contribution genuinely helps keep this alive. You can support me using one of these links; 👉 👉 We’re up against a machine, politicians, police, officials, and media, working together to shrink, sanitise, and bury the truth. This work survives because of you. If you’ve ever shared my posts, learned something, or felt less alone reading them, stand with me. I need your help. Raja 🙏
7:12

Baroness Warsi Claims Campaigning Against The Pakistani Rape Gangs is Racism, Bigotry and Fascism. She is Wrong. Once again, a leading Pakistani Muslim politician has reached for the same tired euphemism used for nearly three decades to blur the truth and shield those responsible. “I think the quicker we move to a position where individuals are judged by their individual characteristics, and the actions of bad people within groups are not superimposed onto entire communities and used as a tool to demonise them, the better. Otherwise we effectively single those communities out as targets for racism and abuse.” Baroness Warsi's interview is a calculated act of moral evasion. The same denial that allowed these crimes to flourish in the first place is now being used to deflect from a simple truth. The industrial scale gang rape of little White girls are not the actions of individuals. They are the consequences of a cultural belief that is deeply embedded in a community. The refusal to acknowledge this is part of a long tradition in Britain of avoiding hard conversations about the communities we imported and the ideologies they carried with them. Successive governments, terrified of upsetting a fragile multicultural consensus, have chosen denial over honesty. To this day, they continue to bury the truth beneath polite language and bureaucratic vagueness, creating the conditions in which this poison has taken root and continues growing unchecked. The Pakistanis who arrived in Britain in large numbers during the 1950s and 1960s did not come as ideologically neutral migrants. They brought with them a worldview forged in the fires of rape, genocide, and ethnic cleansing that underpinned the brutal birth of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. For decades, that worldview was reinforced by the Pakistani government's propaganda promoting the belief that Islam’s survival depended on separation, control, and purity. In Britain, this ideology went unchallenged. And so, here, it festered. To understand the rape gangs and the industrial scale sexual exploitation of this nation’s children, we must confront the deep rooted racial and religious prejudices embedded within these communities. These Men Did Not Emerge From a Vacuum They were shaped by a culture that long ago learned to rationalise violence against those deemed inferior or impure. Only then can we see that what is happening in Britain today is not a cultural aberration, but a continuation, a modern echo of what their fathers, grandfathers and great grandfathers once did in Pakistan. The same doctrine that justified the slaughter and rape of Hindus, Sikhs and Bengalis during Partition has found new expression in Britain. What had once been political has become social. What was once a war between nations has become a war for dominance within neighbourhoods. The ideology that sanctified conquest and control now justifies the exploitation of White girls who, in their worldview, are seen as morally corrupt, religiously impure and therefore sexually available. These Are Not The Actions of Individuals It is behaviour rooted in cultural conditioning that is sustained by collective acceptance. Within these communities, the subjugation of women, the authority of elders and the policing of behaviour are not extremes. They are norms. This theology of social power, where men rule women, elders rule youth and sects rule one another, has created a world in which silence and submission are expected. It was within that silence, and under the cover of communal respectability, that the rape gangs are able to thrive. This is why a judge summing up the latest convictions in Rochdale raised concerns of how they all knew. And they all did nothing. The rape gangs themselves reflect this same social architecture. They operate along clan lines, often involving brothers, cousins, uncles, and family friends who protected one another through blood loyalty and communal silence. These are not isolated predators but organised networks bound by kinship, secrecy, and a shared contempt for the girls they targeted. When this ideology metastasised into organised sexual exploitation of working class White girls, Britain’s institutions looked away. Police officers, councillors and social workers, many of them knowing full well what was happening, chose silence over truth. Fear of being called racist became more powerful than the duty to protect a child. The result was moral paralysis, an entire generation of girls sacrificed to maintain a comforting illusion of community cohesion. Behind This Silence Stands Another Motive Political survival. In many towns and cities, Labour councillors rely on tightly controlled bloc votes from Pakistani communities to keep power. These votes are delivered through local power-brokers, elders and mosque committees who demand loyalty in return for turnout. The price of that loyalty is silence. Politicians know that confronting the rape gangs means confronting the same networks that deliver their majorities. So they look the other way, protected their careers, and branded truth-tellers as racists and troublemakers. The state, terrified of offending a vocal minority and addicted to the arithmetic of bloc politics, allows the language of diversity to become the armour of depravity. What began as political cowardice has since hardened into cultural orthodoxy The same fear that once silenced whistleblowers now shapes our national conversation. Those who protected their bloc votes in the town halls now protect their reputations in Westminster, the media and academia. Instead of reckoning with what happened, they have rewritten the narrative, shifting blame, censoring debate, and recasting moral cowardice as tolerance. This double standard runs deep. The same institutions that silenced victims and ignored predators now lecture the rest of us on morality. The Lesson is Clear In modern Britain, moral outrage is permitted only when it is politically convenient. The same nation that now claims to confront Islamophobia still cannot speak the truth about who is raping its children. _________ I’m Raja Miah MBE. For seven years, I led a campaign that exposed how senior Labour politicians helped protect Pakistani rape gangs. The people of my town helped force the national inquiry. You won’t see me on the BBC. You won’t read my work in the legacy press. That’s not an accident. I take this to a place from where there is no coming back. I document everything in my newsletter. It’s 100% free to read. If this work matters to you, if you believe it must continue, I need your backing. My work is free. No paywalls. No gatekeeping. No exclusions. Because the truth shouldn’t belong only to those who can afford it. If you can afford to do so, supporting me costs as little as 75p a week (£30 a year). Sign up here; 👉 If you can’t commit to a regular subscription, a one-off contribution genuinely helps keep this alive. You can support me using one of these links; 👉 👉 We’re up against a machine, politicians, police, officials, and media, working together to shrink, sanitise, and bury the truth. This work survives because of you. If you’ve ever shared my posts, learned something, or felt less alone reading them, stand with me. I need your help. Raja 🙏

Raja Miah

15,774 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The Meaning Behind What Lucy Powell Really Said There comes a moment when the mask slips, when the carefully constructed political facade crumbles, and the public glimpses the truth behind it. For Labour’s Lucy Powell MP, that moment came during BBC Radio 4’s Any Questions, when she was asked whether she had seen the Channel 4 documentary exposing the industrial-scale sexual exploitation of vulnerable white working-class girls by grooming gangs. Her response? “Oh, you want to blow that little trumpet now, do you? Let’s get that dog whistle out, shall we?” This wasn’t a gaffe. It wasn’t a slip of the tongue. It was a revealing moment of political instinct and one that laid bare the contempt held by parts of The Labour Party for the victims of these appalling crimes. Let’s decode the Leader of the House of Commons' words. Calling it a “little trumpet” is not just flippant, it’s sinister. Powell is diminishing the scale and gravity of the rape and trafficking of over 100,000 girls as if it were nothing more than an irritating noise. In her worldview, the gang rape of White working-class girls is a minor nuisance, an inconvenient topic to be dismissed, not a national scandal demanding action. Even more revealing is her invocation of “dog whistle.” In political language, a dog whistle is a coded phrase intended to signal something controversial or bigoted to a specific audience. It is used to dismiss someone’s argument without engaging with the facts, accusing them of racism without directly saying so. Powell was not just sidestepping the question, she was implying that merely raising this issue was itself an act of prejudice. This tactic is well-worn. For decades, Labour politicians have wielded the accusation of racism to deflect legitimate concerns about grooming gangs, protecting voting blocs from within their Muslim communities at the expense of voiceless victims. Powell’s words weren’t just dismissive. They were a signal, to her allies, to her party’s base: “We will protect you. We will smear your critics. We will bury the truth if it threatens our power.” Surely, Lucy Powell MP's position as Leader of the House of Commons is now untenable and Keir Starmer must sack her? Not a chance!!! Full article will be in the inboxes of subscribers to Red Wall and the Rabble soon. _________ For those new to me, I'm Raja Miah MBE. I spent six years leading a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. My work continues despite powerful forces including the media, politicians, police and public officials all conspiring to desperately stop me and bury the truth. Now millions know the truth of the industrial scale gang rape of working class White girls by organised networks of politically protected Pakistani men. You won't find me in the mainstream media. With no corporate backers or political sponsors, I rely solely on the support of ordinary people who understand what's at stake. If you value this work, please subscribe to my newsletter. We really need to grow our numbers. All my work is 100% free. I only ask for a small contribution if you can afford to do so; Prefer a one-time contribution? Please help finish this. Raja 🙏
0:43

The Meaning Behind What Lucy Powell Really Said There comes a moment when the mask slips, when the carefully constructed political facade crumbles, and the public glimpses the truth behind it. For Labour’s Lucy Powell MP, that moment came during BBC Radio 4’s Any Questions, when she was asked whether she had seen the Channel 4 documentary exposing the industrial-scale sexual exploitation of vulnerable white working-class girls by grooming gangs. Her response? “Oh, you want to blow that little trumpet now, do you? Let’s get that dog whistle out, shall we?” This wasn’t a gaffe. It wasn’t a slip of the tongue. It was a revealing moment of political instinct and one that laid bare the contempt held by parts of The Labour Party for the victims of these appalling crimes. Let’s decode the Leader of the House of Commons' words. Calling it a “little trumpet” is not just flippant, it’s sinister. Powell is diminishing the scale and gravity of the rape and trafficking of over 100,000 girls as if it were nothing more than an irritating noise. In her worldview, the gang rape of White working-class girls is a minor nuisance, an inconvenient topic to be dismissed, not a national scandal demanding action. Even more revealing is her invocation of “dog whistle.” In political language, a dog whistle is a coded phrase intended to signal something controversial or bigoted to a specific audience. It is used to dismiss someone’s argument without engaging with the facts, accusing them of racism without directly saying so. Powell was not just sidestepping the question, she was implying that merely raising this issue was itself an act of prejudice. This tactic is well-worn. For decades, Labour politicians have wielded the accusation of racism to deflect legitimate concerns about grooming gangs, protecting voting blocs from within their Muslim communities at the expense of voiceless victims. Powell’s words weren’t just dismissive. They were a signal, to her allies, to her party’s base: “We will protect you. We will smear your critics. We will bury the truth if it threatens our power.” Surely, Lucy Powell MP's position as Leader of the House of Commons is now untenable and Keir Starmer must sack her? Not a chance!!! Full article will be in the inboxes of subscribers to Red Wall and the Rabble soon. _________ For those new to me, I'm Raja Miah MBE. I spent six years leading a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. My work continues despite powerful forces including the media, politicians, police and public officials all conspiring to desperately stop me and bury the truth. Now millions know the truth of the industrial scale gang rape of working class White girls by organised networks of politically protected Pakistani men. You won't find me in the mainstream media. With no corporate backers or political sponsors, I rely solely on the support of ordinary people who understand what's at stake. If you value this work, please subscribe to my newsletter. We really need to grow our numbers. All my work is 100% free. I only ask for a small contribution if you can afford to do so; Prefer a one-time contribution? Please help finish this. Raja 🙏

Raja Miah

165,506 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

WATCH: CNN’s Jake Tapper brings on Andrew McCabe and Adam Kinzinger to MELT DOWN over the FBI raids of offices and businesses connecting to Virginia state Senate Democratic leader Louise Lucas, suggesting there is a strong possibility we should not believe anything they find is legitimate.... Tapper: “The FBI will not say on the record why they executed the search warrant at the offices and businesses of the Virginia state Senator, Louise Lucas. What was your reaction to the news? McCabe: “You know, it’s shocking, Jake. And it — it raises a couple of really interesting points. First, of course, this is a search warrant. It’s not an indictment. She hasn’t been charged with anything. She certainly hasn’t been convicted of any wrongdoing. Every search warrant is accompanied by an affidavit. That’s the facts that are presented to the judge, upon which the judge determines that there’s probable cause to believe there’s evidence of a crime inside that location. We don’t see those facts. We don’t typically see those affidavits. They are sealed until that person is — is charged and brought to court. And there’s all kinds of good reasons for that. So, I don’t think we can really assess whether or not the FBI or the Department of Justice are being fully transparent here when they say, oh, this is a long-term investigation that began under — under President Biden. The second point is really what you were just mentioning. I think people have very good reasons to be suspicious of what they’re hearing from the department in regards to this investigation. There are a lot of potential political motivations here. And the fact is, this Department of Justice has lost the presumption of regularity. And it’s because of the way they’ve conducted their business in courts across this country. They’ve been found having provided misinformation to courts, ignoring court orders, violating people’s rights, injecting political language into court filings that would never see such arguments before. So, judge after judge after judge has made comments on the record that there are basically not taking the department at their word any more. And that is a very, very dangerous thing for the country and for the department’s ability to do their job.” Tapper: “Congressman Kinzinger obviously, Louise Lucas is one of the most powerful Democrats in the Commonwealth of Virginia, which just moved to add a bunch of congressional districts in favor of Democrats taking them away from Republicans. What was your first thought when you heard about this raid?” Kinzinger: “Yeah, it was the same as everybody, which is at first I’m like, is this just politically motivated? And it may or may not be. But also keep in mind, on top of, you know, the fact that Trump has gone after his political opponents, he — it’s also very rare now to see the Department of Justice, if ever, go after a Republican. In fact, Department of Justice has dropped cases against Republicans. And the President continues to pardon Republicans, I mean, pardon people that are friendly to him or have friendly opinions. And so, what’s happening is not only is the FBI being sullied and the entire Department of Justice, but frankly, this administration is not seen as doing work on good faith. And just think about this too. You know, this whole war in Iran, Iran says things the U.S. government says things up until about the last year and a half, whenever Iran and the U.S. government said conflicting things, you would take the U.S. Government’s word to the bank. But lately, that’s not the case. Iran is clearly a regime that lies. But the President clearly lies. And so, this whole crisis in truth, I think, is going to end up being something that goes far beyond Donald Trump’s two and a half years in office left. This is going to go far beyond that and go into what does truth mean for society. And I think that’s really, really chilling. And frankly, a federal government that goes after political opponents is extremely chilling, too.” Tapper: “So, any decent defense lawyer when it comes to these prosecutions or investigations of political rivals of President Trump’s, will argue malicious prosecution, which is what it sounds like, which is the President has it out for me. And this is all made up for that reason. Do you think Louise Lucas, state Senator Lucas, will have an argument there? I mean, she is not like James Comey, Adam Schiff, Letitia James. She’s not like I don’t even know if he knows her name, you know?” McCabe: “Yeah, yeah. So, I mean, really, we need to see the facts behind these actions before we can assess how strong the case If they in fact, bring one is against the — the state Senator. But absolutely those motions are more common today than they were a year and a half ago. And I should also say that in the past, selective prosecution, vindictive prosecution, those are some of the hardest motions to possibly prevail upon because the Department of Justice didn’t actually engage in that sort of behavior. And the threshold for success in those motions is very high. Not so now, right? The current Jim Comey indictment is the perfect example.” Tapper: “For the seashells.” McCabe: “Hard to imagine that a vindictive and selective prosecution motion doesn’t succeed in that case, because it is so obviously vindictive and selective.” Tapper: “Well, and they’re supporters of the President that have posted 86/46 about — repeatedly about Joe Biden. And, you know, even when those have been pointed out to the acting U.S. Attorney, acting U.S. Attorney General, he doesn’t care.” McCabe: “Brushes it aside.”
5:03

WATCH: CNN’s Jake Tapper brings on Andrew McCabe and Adam Kinzinger to MELT DOWN over the FBI raids of offices and businesses connecting to Virginia state Senate Democratic leader Louise Lucas, suggesting there is a strong possibility we should not believe anything they find is legitimate.... Tapper: “The FBI will not say on the record why they executed the search warrant at the offices and businesses of the Virginia state Senator, Louise Lucas. What was your reaction to the news? McCabe: “You know, it’s shocking, Jake. And it — it raises a couple of really interesting points. First, of course, this is a search warrant. It’s not an indictment. She hasn’t been charged with anything. She certainly hasn’t been convicted of any wrongdoing. Every search warrant is accompanied by an affidavit. That’s the facts that are presented to the judge, upon which the judge determines that there’s probable cause to believe there’s evidence of a crime inside that location. We don’t see those facts. We don’t typically see those affidavits. They are sealed until that person is — is charged and brought to court. And there’s all kinds of good reasons for that. So, I don’t think we can really assess whether or not the FBI or the Department of Justice are being fully transparent here when they say, oh, this is a long-term investigation that began under — under President Biden. The second point is really what you were just mentioning. I think people have very good reasons to be suspicious of what they’re hearing from the department in regards to this investigation. There are a lot of potential political motivations here. And the fact is, this Department of Justice has lost the presumption of regularity. And it’s because of the way they’ve conducted their business in courts across this country. They’ve been found having provided misinformation to courts, ignoring court orders, violating people’s rights, injecting political language into court filings that would never see such arguments before. So, judge after judge after judge has made comments on the record that there are basically not taking the department at their word any more. And that is a very, very dangerous thing for the country and for the department’s ability to do their job.” Tapper: “Congressman Kinzinger obviously, Louise Lucas is one of the most powerful Democrats in the Commonwealth of Virginia, which just moved to add a bunch of congressional districts in favor of Democrats taking them away from Republicans. What was your first thought when you heard about this raid?” Kinzinger: “Yeah, it was the same as everybody, which is at first I’m like, is this just politically motivated? And it may or may not be. But also keep in mind, on top of, you know, the fact that Trump has gone after his political opponents, he — it’s also very rare now to see the Department of Justice, if ever, go after a Republican. In fact, Department of Justice has dropped cases against Republicans. And the President continues to pardon Republicans, I mean, pardon people that are friendly to him or have friendly opinions. And so, what’s happening is not only is the FBI being sullied and the entire Department of Justice, but frankly, this administration is not seen as doing work on good faith. And just think about this too. You know, this whole war in Iran, Iran says things the U.S. government says things up until about the last year and a half, whenever Iran and the U.S. government said conflicting things, you would take the U.S. Government’s word to the bank. But lately, that’s not the case. Iran is clearly a regime that lies. But the President clearly lies. And so, this whole crisis in truth, I think, is going to end up being something that goes far beyond Donald Trump’s two and a half years in office left. This is going to go far beyond that and go into what does truth mean for society. And I think that’s really, really chilling. And frankly, a federal government that goes after political opponents is extremely chilling, too.” Tapper: “So, any decent defense lawyer when it comes to these prosecutions or investigations of political rivals of President Trump’s, will argue malicious prosecution, which is what it sounds like, which is the President has it out for me. And this is all made up for that reason. Do you think Louise Lucas, state Senator Lucas, will have an argument there? I mean, she is not like James Comey, Adam Schiff, Letitia James. She’s not like I don’t even know if he knows her name, you know?” McCabe: “Yeah, yeah. So, I mean, really, we need to see the facts behind these actions before we can assess how strong the case If they in fact, bring one is against the — the state Senator. But absolutely those motions are more common today than they were a year and a half ago. And I should also say that in the past, selective prosecution, vindictive prosecution, those are some of the hardest motions to possibly prevail upon because the Department of Justice didn’t actually engage in that sort of behavior. And the threshold for success in those motions is very high. Not so now, right? The current Jim Comey indictment is the perfect example.” Tapper: “For the seashells.” McCabe: “Hard to imagine that a vindictive and selective prosecution motion doesn’t succeed in that case, because it is so obviously vindictive and selective.” Tapper: “Well, and they’re supporters of the President that have posted 86/46 about — repeatedly about Joe Biden. And, you know, even when those have been pointed out to the acting U.S. Attorney, acting U.S. Attorney General, he doesn’t care.” McCabe: “Brushes it aside.”

Curtis Houck

92,206 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten