Where Do We Go From Here? (Bitcoin and Forks)

Now do Core and Saylor and Blockstream

Already did:

Well for starters, You change your channel name to Shitcoin University.

Ima suprised you hadn’t sold your bitcoin since you’re a shitcoiner😂

Congrats on being a living example of the stereotype I described in the video

You’re a shitcoiner, enough said 😂

@mattkratter The irony here is you probably didnt even watch the video lol!

@mattkratter I did and he said a whole lotta nothing

Forget about all the name-calling and he said she said. No ad hominems here. Just the response to your arguments you say you’re looking for. You claim: Bitcoin cannot be saved. It’s been captured by “Big Bitcoin,” colluding miners, Wall Street and/or the government. What exactly is your evidence for any of that, other than the spectacular failure of the 110 soft fork? Only a very small number of nodes (and even fewer miners) signaled for 110. How do you make the leap from that to collusion and capture? Do you not admit the possibility that thinking Bitcoiners might have decided for themselves that 110’s proposed cure was more dangerous than the spam it was aimed at? Why I oppose it 110: It would change consensus rules to enforce a subjective judgment about “proper” use. 110 did not merely impose relay policy. It would make previously valid transactions invalid at consensus by restricting output scripts, witness items, Taproot features and OP_RETURN data. Bitcoin consensus should be harder to change than an act of congress. And the assent of 55% of miners doesn’t reach that threshold. If you want to change Bitcoin’s consensus rules, you should need broad stakeholder consent. And BIP110 didn’t have that. Not even close.

Famous last words- "bitcoin is dead"

We’re grateful Matt, we looked and found you. Programmable currency was always the DeepStates plan, we were lied to again. We were not diligent enough to simply ByPassTheFED with bitcoin (at least I wasn’t but sure pushed it in my business)

If we are successful in restarting the BIP-110 blockchain after September 1st, the captured BTC may never reach an all-time high again. I will enjoy that very much. Let’s be courageous. Joshua 1.9: “Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be afraid; do not be discouraged, for the Lord your God will be with you wherever you go.”

And…Lyn Alden is a dude!

I think everyone is throwing themselves on the sword before the battle begins.

Swap to litecoin Run a node use mweb support nexus/cake/cupcake wallet It's just a better btc distro

Where Do We Go From Here? (Bitcoin and Forks)

I absolutely agree. But staying and changing core is the answer brother. Please 🙏 patience. I 100% stand by you Kratter.

The pattern integrity of Bitcoin will survive and thrive. As we massage and slide the knot across the junctions, it moves seamlessly from corechain to blake2b and onto the next material without altering its total pattern integrity. Bitcoin is a living system.

Matt. Pls DM me, there’s a way to fend off attacks on our new chain, it needs to be discussed “behind closed doors”. I don’t want to say it publicly. Then you can pass it on to Luke and Mechanic.

You start buying @DigiByteCoin

ToddCoin

Would love your insights on SoftWar

@mattkratter you had one moral issue No money is perfect but bitcoin is 99.8% good And better than all the competition by a mile You had a mission to make it 100% good Your mission failed. Surely you can’t throw it all away cos of a 1.2% problem that’ll very unreasonable!

Reputation is in the gutter. Where do you go from here is up to you

The broader context—that BIP-110 rejection is the straw the broke the camel's back, motivating this extremely radical departure—makes this silly. BIP-110's temporary fix is just bad. It promises the need for future tinkering; non-robust. It should have been permanent fixes.

My philosophy was always if Bitcoin loses or starts to lose its core fundamentals I'll seriously consider unloading.

1/ My attempt at (3): Bitcoin is extremely resilient. It is also running in numerous failure modes, several of which it was born into (e.g. US tax treatment). The phenomenon of spam/spammers is a known, bounded, intelligent, partially antifragile antagonist-for-its-own-sake.

inspired by you and limited by my resources. I am trying to add a voice to the conversation. in this video I touch on briefly on what I think is still our trump card. we still have access to the network to connect our own node implementations and to mine.

Let's call it a spork fork

@hodlonaut Put your money where your mouth is or everything you say is empty talk

We don't need 90 % we need 51%

Thanks Matt. Even if a BTC fork with all the right agenda ever happens, it would still take an enormous effort for the new chain to survive—largely because the name “BTC/Bitcoin” itself has been firmly anchored in the world’s consciousness for the past 17 years.

Satoshi is not in favour of proof of work changes unless it improves security

Straight into crypto hell, I would assume.

Back to the drawing board

If BIPpers had real conviction, they would have sold their BTC already. The ultimate statement of discontent with the network, and would truly make Suitcoiners feel consequences as Bitcoin crashes to $20k. Where's your conviction

Go away

Hooray

Holding both More node clients + Datum Think this is the path has the highest chance of succeeding. Still going to be really hard It preserve's: • Bitcoin (brand) • BTC (political ticker) • Bitcoins network effects