正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Where is this Chiranjeevi now?🥲 Present Rajinikanth chustunna high motham Chiru kuda chusi undevadu, madyalo 10 years waste cheskokunda unte..🏃🏻‍♂️‍➡️ Chiranjeevi Prime then = Prabhas prime now❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

149,818 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

ఉంగ అమ్మ తప్పుకోరా 😎 的头像
ఉంగ అమ్మ తప్పుకోరా 😎1 年前

Chiranjeevi chusina prime total telugu industry yevadu chudaledu edeee fact.. Yendhuku ante Appudu 1 to 10 unanimous chiranjeevi aa 11th place gurinchi discussions ayyevi ah range ayanadi

Gan Jing World 的头像
Gan Jing World2 年前

✦ The Fatal Encounter ✦ One year into King Jeong-jo’s reign, a fated day unfolds about one who must live, one who must kill, and one who must protect. 🍿Watch Now

Pisthar Bobbattu 的头像
Pisthar Bobbattu1 年前

Nee ruddhudu thagalayya matter atu thippi itu thippi malli PB daggarake theeskosthav

Sravani 的头像
Sravani1 年前

To be fact rajini market ekkuva overseas lo easy ga 100cr to 200cr vasthai inka unanimous talk vasthe 300cr kuda possible rajini ki And malayalam telugu karnataka konchem north kuda undu market Chiru ki avi em levu accept that first

Chimptu Babu🚩 的头像
Chimptu Babu🚩1 年前

Bring the freaking Ghost back @NameisNani #ChiruOdela

StarBoy 的头像
StarBoy1 年前

Anavasaranga politics ki vellaadu boss!!

Manohar 的头像
Manohar1 年前

Ippudu comeback ivvochu if proper scripts vasthe aynaki Hopefully Yevaraina proper role isthe baagunnu

RRRaj! 的头像
RRRaj!1 年前

Chiranjeevi Prime then = Prabhas prime now WTF?????

Preethamvarma 的头像
Preethamvarma1 年前

Stalin Tagore Dady A refreshment movies

@urstruly reddy 的头像
@urstruly reddy1 年前

Prabhas tho chiranjeevi ni polchadam enti chiru eppudaina thop prabhas ki prime miss ayindhi sure ga BB tarwata okati breakevem ledhu may be upcoming line up bagundhi so he will be... Kalki vundhi gini.. Salarodu bokka padindhi which had multiple reason..date pp clash..

相关视频

It is entirely unbecoming of the Prime Minister of India to be celebrating the inauguration of a temple in Paris while dead bodies of students are being pulled out of the rubble of a hostel in New Delhi. After a scandal involving women being asked not to work at the Eiffel Tower during the BAPS visit, the MEA has said the Indian government had nothing to do with the matter. If the Indian government had nothing to do with the matter, then why was the ambassador present at the inauguration? Why was the Prime Minister speaking with the Indian flag in the background, as the Prime Minister of India and not as a private citizen, at the inauguration of this temple? When the Ram Janmabhoomi Temple was inaugurated in Ayodhya, it was explicitly made clear that the Prime Minister is attending in a personal capacity. How does he attend the inauguration of a temple in an official capacity now? How does he talk about the India-France bilateral relationship at that address? Now you cannot run away from these difficult questions. India's ambassador to UNESCO is busy defending BAPS. BAPS is a private limited company in France. The temple itself claims that tens of millions of euros were used in the building of this temple that makes it historic. Where did this money come from? How has it gone into a private limited company? What is the accountability for promoting a temple like this? Does the Prime Minister promote all temples that are opened across the world? Does the Prime Minister promote gurdwaras that are opened across the world? Does the Prime Minister promote mosques that are open across the world? Or have we stopped pretending we are a secular country? Finally, this has become a moment for the far right in France to target Indians. That's racist, and that racist hatred must be called out, but that hatred cannot be used as a justification for labour rights violations at that temple. In New Jersey, serious allegations were made that Dalit labourers were exploited, paid below minimum wage. Forty people apparently have died of silicosis, according to some estimates, because of that stone cutting. Who will take responsibility for these actions? Who will answer questions as to why the land was donated to BAPS in France, why land was donated in Abu Dhabi to the same BAPS? Is there pressure from the Indian government in doing so? Difficult questions cannot be avoided, and certainly not right now under the guise of religion.

Anish Gawande

24,527 次观看 • 18 天前

Former UK🇬🇧 Defence Minister Tobias Ellwood: “Sir Keir Starmer’s resignation is a reflection of where politics has gone, how fickle it is, how fickle the nation is in wanting results so quickly. Social media fuels this, of course, but there's an impatience that if you're in there just two years and you don't get good results, then people start to question whether you should stay in office. And of course I can't complain about this because I came from a government where we had a churn of Prime Ministers. We got through four or five. And I think I say this with some sadness that this is currently where Britain is. Other Western European countries are not throwing out their leaders, their premiers, halfway through office. Times are tough now and we've entered a new era of insecurity. The global order itself has started to fragment. We've got Russia and China working closer together. America disengaging. Where is our world going? And economically, of course, this is a very testing time. Whether it's Iran and what's going on there, whether it's Covid that hit us too, whether it was the financial crisis before that. There's been a series of testing events which means that economically, these are difficult times. Now if the nation itself, the people, then get frustrated, clearly they're going to express that in the popularity of whoever is Prime Minister at the time. What is different is that MPs themselves then look at the poll ratings and say, "I think we could probably do better with somebody else." And that is very, very unusual. That's a different phase that we've gone into from a British perspective. I don't think from the international perspective you're going to see much change with Andy Burnham coming in compared with Keir Starmer. Domestically, probably, yes. But certainly from a foreign policy perspective, I don't think you're going to see much change at all.” —Tobias Ellwood, former UK Defence Minister and Author of ‘Ten Steps to Prevent World War 3’, joins us for Monday’s Going Underground Don’t miss it, follow us on X and follow our Rumble channel, link below in the replies👇

Going Underground

30,945 次观看 • 2 个月前

Peak Sense of Entitlement After Chara Chori now Ghar Chori? After nearly *20 years*of occupying the prime government bungalow at *10 Circular Road, Patna*(allotted to Rabri Devi after her Chief Minister tenure ended in 2005), the Lalu family is still refusing to leave — even when given an alternative home. • 2019 Patna High Court ruled that lifetime government bungalows for former CMs were unconstitutional and a waste of public money. Notices were issued to Rabri Devi and others. • Nov 25, 2025 (right after NDA’s historic 202/243 seat landslide that crushed RJD): Building Construction Dept allotted Rabri Devi (as Leader of Opposition) a proper alternative residence at 39 Hardinge Road and directed her to vacate Circular Road. • May 2026: The same bungalow was officially allotted to a sitting minister (Dairy & Fisheries Minister Nand Kishore Ram). Fresh notice issued May 29 directing immediate vacation. • May 30, 2026: Rabri Devi returns from vacation and declares “Let them evict me by force. I am not going to vacate” — despite having another government house already allotted to her. This is not about homelessness. This is pure *dynastic entitlement* The Lalu family has treated taxpayer-funded government property as their personal fiefdom for two decades. They lost badly at the polls, ignored a High Court order, received an alternative residence, and still act like rules don’t apply to them. *Public assets are not family inheritance. Accountability should apply to everyone — especially those who LOOTED Bihar for years.* Enough NOW

Shehzad Jai Hind (Chowkidar as per INC ecosystem)

15,847 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 WE ARE LIVE: ESTATEX PLATFORM IS OFFICIALLY OPEN! 🚨 EstateX family, the moment we’ve all been waiting for has finally arrived. Our investment platform is now LIVE and with it, exciting new property offerings you can reserve starting today 🔥 Allocations are limited, and speed matters, especially in these first hours. ✨ EARLY ACCESS IS NOW OPEN Unicorn Club members and NFT Holders can log in right now at to secure their reservations before anyone else. If you have early access, don’t waste a second. Opportunities like these move fast. ⏳ Public reservations will open on Friday, but by then the best allocations may already be taken. 🌴 🔥 SPOTLIGHT OFFERING: TUI BLUE CAPE VERDE HOLIDAY RESORT 🔥 Already generating major excitement, and here’s why: 🏝 Exclusive Early Entry Price: Reserve a €150,000 TUI Blue Cape Verde Resort unit for just €130,000, a 13% launch discount. 💶 Solid Rental Income: 6% fixed rental income for the first three years. 📈 Capital Growth Potential: Projected 8 to 10% annual appreciation, backed by real sales momentum. 🏨 Full Freehold Ownership: A managed beachfront resort with a leading hospitality brand, high demand, prime location. 🔥 TODAY IS A MILESTONE FOR ESTATEX. 🔥 EARLY INVESTORS MOVE FIRST. 🔥 THE WINDOW IS NOW OPEN. Log in, reserve your spot, and secure your piece of the future: 👉 Remember: Only Unicorn members and NFT holders can reserve today. If you’re not eligible yet, maybe a Unicorn member can send you a special invite 😉

EstateX

72,496 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 THE REAL COST OF KAGAME’S WEALTH IS RWANDAN LIVES 🚨 Justice Delayed = Justice Denied. Full Stop. 💥 8 YEARS. 💥 Hundreds of Families. 💥 Zero Accountability. While Rwanda’s top leadership parades global rankings and luxury wealth, ordinary citizens are paying the price with their homes, dignity, and future. This is not development. This is dispossession. 🏚️ Kangondo & Kibiraro: 8 Years of State-Made Suffering In 2018, families from Kangondo & Kibiraro were pushed out, 🏗️ homes demolished, 📉 properties undervalued, 🚫 promised compensations never delivered, 🏢 and many forced into tiny Busanza units that don’t match what they lost. City-appointed valuers put absurd figures like $8k for 1,000m², then even THAT money vanished into thin air. Meanwhile… the same land they were removed from? 💰 Now tied to high value redevelopment worth $475,000 for 320m². So it was never about “urban planning.” It was about power. It was about who gets to live where. It was about who benefits, and who suffers. ⚖️ And Now? Kigali City RUNS From Court. After years of appeals, protests, and a 2024 High Court ruling confirming these families deserve compensation, the City suddenly decides to withdraw from the very case citizens filed? 😡 This is cowardice. 😡 This is manipulation. 😡 This is the opposite of transparency. 😡 This is NOT justice. Kangondo & Kibiraro families were not “relocated.” They were squeezed, silenced, and abandoned. 🧨 THE PATTERN IS CLEAR Concentration of wealth + power at the top ⬇️ Suffering at the bottom. When “prime land” becomes the excuse, citizens become obstacles. And when powerful investors ,including those linked to the first family and figures like Denis Karera ,step in, ordinary Rwandans are pushed out of the picture entirely. This isn’t accidental. This is a system. ✊🏾 Kangondo & Kibiraro Families Deserve: ✔️ Fair compensation ✔️ Respect ✔️ Restoration of dignity ✔️ Accountability from leaders Their courage for 8 YEARS exposes something the powerful fear most: 📢 A generation that refuses silence. 📢 A movement that refuses fear. 🔥 This is why #MillenZMovementRw exists. To speak. To expose. To refuse the lies. To refuse the suffering of our people while the elite grow richer and louder.

U.Sheila C kamuzinzi 🇷🇼🇸🇬

60,589 次观看 • 10 个月前

🦔Amazon's Prime delivery drones, now deployed across multiple US cities at $4.99 per delivery, drop packages from 10 feet in the air onto whatever surface is below. A teacher who ordered a bottle of syrup to test fragile deliveries watched the drone deposit it directly onto concrete, smashing it. Videos from Nashville show the same delivery method. Amazon's drones maintain a fixed 10-foot hover height before releasing packages, which then free-fall to the ground. The drone's propellers also disturb the surrounding area on descent. My Take Amazon has invested billions in drone delivery infrastructure and the pitch has always been speed and convenience as genuine improvements over traditional delivery. Dropping packages from 10 feet onto concrete is not a delivery innovation. It's a trebuchet with a Prime logo. The fragile item problem alone eliminates a significant portion of what people actually order, including wine, glassware, electronics, and anything in a glass jar, which covers a substantial chunk of Amazon's catalog. The deeper question is whether this technology is being deployed because it's ready or because Amazon needs to demonstrate progress on the billions already committed to it. Every video like this one becomes a public test of a product that isn't finished, in neighborhoods where the company needs goodwill to maintain operating permissions. The $4.99 fee also doesn't cover the actual cost of drone delivery at current scale, which means Amazon is subsidizing a service that breaks your syrup. I'd want to see the unit economics on this before calling it a viable business. Hedgie🤗

Hedgie

15,810 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 WARNING: SOMETHING VERY BAD IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW Nvidia just pumped +7% in a single day, pushing the stock market to new all-time highs. Media are calling it a historic rally. But almost nobody is paying attention to the real problem: A massive AI bubble is inflating at an incredible speed and it's about to pop. This has happened before. 2000: Cisco was the "god of the internet" with routers, switches, infrastructure. Then the bubble burst. The stock crashed 90% and took 25 years just to recover. Today: Nvidia is the "god of AI" with chips, data centers, infrastructure. Same role. Same script. But the risk is much bigger. Let me explain why. Market concentration just hit an all-time high. The "Magnificent 7" now accounts for over 34% of the entire S&P 500. And that's not the worst part. Big Tech CapEx is exploding: Over $650 billion in 2026 alone. But where is the ROI? Nobody knows. If Microsoft and Google don't show real revenue, they will cut chip orders. Then Nvidia collapses, and the entire index follows. Meanwhile, Japan, holding trillions in U.S. Treasuries, is preparing to hike rates. When they unwind, global liquidity evaporates, and risk assets get crushed first. This isn't just 2000. This is 2000 with historical leverage, record concentration, and a liquidity shock loading. Remember, I've called every major turn for the last 10 years, including the Bitcoin crash from $111K and the SpaceX drop from $220. When the bubble bursts, I'll call it here publicly like I always do. Stay close.

MARMOT

86,246 次观看 • 1 个月前

The difference in the reaction of the members now that they are in their 30s 🤭 🐰 : But whenever I bring this up, the members would go like “what are you even talking about? Honestly, turning 30 was a really touching moment for me. Like.. Wow! I'm really 30 now. I wonder what kind of life will unfold in my 30s, I was super excited about it. So when I tell fans stuff like, “We're in our 30s now” or “We've already been together for 10 years”… Since I was the first one to turn 30, they'd say, “Isn't the average age getting too high because of you, hyung?” At first, they'd just say things like that jokingly. But then, one by one, as each member hit 30, like “You’re 30 now too, Chanyeol-ah. You're in your 30s now”. Every time someone turned 30, I kept bringing it up. And now that even our maknae turned 30, I'd say, “We’ve really become such a mature, cool, adult group!” Whenever I’d day something like that, at some point, they just completely stopped reacting. Because if they react, it might be brought up again on broadcast or something. Kyungsoo is more accepting. He's like, “Why? We’re in our 30s now… Since we’re in our 30s, isn’t it okay for us to have a beer or something during a broadcast?” He talks like that. Chanyeol hates it though. He's like, “Stop it, hyung! We don't even look like we're in our 30s, why do you keep reminding people about it?!” He says people wouldn't even notice just looking at us, but I keep imprinting on everyone that EXO is now a group where everyone is in their 30s… Oh… I think I talked about it way too much today as well! 😅

NLNL 🍒🔥

11,939 次观看 • 2 天前

Britain installed its 7th prime minister in 10 years this morning, and for the first time in G7 history the man walking through the door of Number 10 is on record pledging to build a Web3 powerhouse. Andy Burnham took office at 10 Downing Street without a general election, appointed unchallenged by his own party. The man he replaced was forced out by his own MPs and left the doorstep saying my work is done. In a January interview that same man warned that removing him in 2026 would plunge Britain into utter chaos. His party listened carefully, waited for spring, then did it anyway. The route to power tells you what British democracy has become. Burnham quit the Manchester mayoralty, won a risky by-election on 19th June, re-entered Parliament within days, and was crowned Labour leader unchallenged on Friday after his only rival withdrew and endorsed him. Today, King Charles asked Andy to form a government. Between the by-election and the black door, no ordinary voter cast a single ballot on who runs the country. Five of Britain's last six changes of prime minister have now happened without a general election. Power in the world's oldest parliamentary democracy changes hands by party process, and the public watches it on television live. Absorb the churn. Cameron, May, Johnson, Truss, Sunak, Starmer, Burnham. Seven leaders in a decade, an average occupancy of about seventeen months, a turnover rate Britain once mocked Italy for. Starmer's landslide was only 2 years ago, won on 33.7% of the vote, the smallest share of any majority government since records began in 1830, and by January polled near 19%. Larry the cat, 15 yrs at #10, has outlasted 6 prime ministers and greeted his 7th this morning. The new one arrived pledging stability. The last one pledged stability on the same doorstep two years ago. The doorstep does not remember. To be fair to the machine, Britain has swapped leaders mid-term 11 times since 1945. The constitution is working as designed. What changed is the frequency. One layer nobody in Westminster is pricing. Burnham is the first G7 head of government with a crypto pledge on tape, telling a Manchester audience I'm bought in, promising to make Manchester the Web3 powerhouse that we want it to be. Before the champagne, the calibration. That record is municipal boosterism, not national policy. He has published no digital assets platform. The FCA's crypto rulebook is nearly final and its authors do not answer to him. And the twist worth savoring, he inherits a party that froze crypto donations to political campaigns in March after a review flagged foreign influence risk, and is now moving to make that ban permanent. The most crypto-friendly leader in British history arrives inside a system wired to distrust crypto money in politics. The deeper pattern is the inversion underneath all of it. The first G7 digital sovereign bond is scheduled for early 2027. The Bank of England's stablecoin regime goes operational the same year, complete with a 40 billion pound issuance guardrail per coin. British money is being rebuilt for the next fifty years by an independent civil service on decade-long clocks. The pound's plumbing now has a longer time horizon than the pound's politicians, and that is the quiet story of the age. The state is becoming more durable than the people who run it, and the money is becoming more modern than the politicians who sign for it. So the 7th prime minister begins, acutely aware of the churn, his aides say, and promising to end it. All six before him promised something similar. Maybe he is different. He has chased this job through two failed leadership runs and nobody doubts he wants it. The arithmetic keeps its own counsel. The digital money rails now being wired are designed to run for half a century. The average occupant of Number 10 this decade lasted seventeen months. Britain is building money meant to outlive its signatories, and this morning it watched another one arrive.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

89,730 次观看 • 2 个月前