正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Whether you agree or disagree with Ancelotti’s decision regarding João Pedro, this moment here really is what changed everything for the player from my point of view. Let me explain below👇🏽 João Pedro entered the March call with a reportedly “GUARANTEED” spot at the World Cup. The player who...

54,281 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Rory Jennings 🗣️ I hate Enzo Fernández. You heard that completely correctly: I hate Enzo Fernández. A lot of people seem to be very annoyed by this. They are becoming irate with me and suggesting that my Instagram posts have been aggressive, unnecessary and unedifying. They do not like what I have been saying about Enzo Fernández. They could be right, and I respect their opinions. I would also like to hear yours. I genuinely seek your counsel here: am I wrong, or am I completely and utterly justified? I am going to explain my feelings about Enzo Fernández. I will discuss his character, his conduct throughout the World Cup and his overall behaviour as a footballer. At the end of this video, I want your feedback. Let me know in the comments section whether you think I am right or wrong. For me, Enzo Fernández is undoubtedly the most dislikable and objectionable footballer at the entire World Cup. There is not one redeeming feature about him. There is absolutely nothing about him that I find even mildly inspiring. He is a brat. An objectionable brat. He is incredibly dislikable, and some of his behaviour has genuinely blown my mind. This is how deep my dislike goes: when anybody tries to defend Enzo Fernández or explain why he is supposedly a good person, I find it morally bankrupt. I think it is a disgrace that Enzo Fernández is the Chelsea captain. I think it is a disgrace that he has ever had the honour of wearing the captain’s armband. When you consider the man and the circumstances surrounding Enzo Maresca’s decision to give him that armband, especially after everything we had already seen him do, I genuinely believe it is a stain on the history of Chelsea Football Club that a man like Enzo Fernández ever got his hands on that armband. Watching Enzo Fernández cost his team the World Cup was incredibly satisfying. He was the architect of Argentina’s downfall and the reason they lost the World Cup final. #NG67

SHAYEE 𒀭

135,338 次观看 • 1 个月前

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”

Wall Street Apes

115,712 次观看 • 1 年前