Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Which relative would they strike with such fury? ☠️Link here: #incest #incestoconmamá #incestohijomamá #incestomãefilho #incestmother #motherincest #incestkink #motherkink #motherson #familytaboo #taboo

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

VIDEO | CJP Protest: At Jantar Mantar, CPI(M) General Secretary MA Baby (M A Baby) says, "They have had a discussion. Within their own, you know, core group and they have decided that they will continue their agitation in Jantar Mantar. Though Abhijeet Dipke withdrew his hunger strike. He announced here that Shri Sonam Wangchuk after having heard the brutality perpetrated on boys and girls, he has been shocked, and he has decided to continue his hunger strike. Earlier, he was considering as part of a negotiation, and also part of the realisation that these issues are being raised on the floor of the parliament. So, he don't have to continue his hunger strike, that was one thinking which he had. But having known what heinous, unacceptable, obnoxious brutality Narendra Modi, Amit Shah, Mohan Bhagwat's police perpetrated on innocent boys and girls, Sonam Wangchuk has communicated his decision to Shri Abhijeet Dipke that he don't stop his hunger strike. He is continuing his hunger strike. So in that context, they have decided that they will continue the agitation, they won't vacate Jantar Mantar till Dharmendra Pradhan resigns. Those who have committed suicide as a result of the corrupt and surreptitious manner in which entrance examination was held. So the families where suicides had happened there has to be a compensation of one crore to be released. And the education policy which is centralisation, commercialisation and so on. They have their opposition to that. So this with raising these demand they would continue, that is CJP would continue to occupy this Jantar Mantar." #CJPProtest

Press Trust of India

24,466 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨Iran’s🇮🇷 DEVASTATING Capabilities to strike the US🇺🇸: Cyber-attacks, Super EMPs…NUKES? ‘Iran has a number of options to attack the US, both in terms of attacking US forces in the 50 military bases we have in the region, and US carrier strike groups. They have hypersonic missiles which we cannot intercept. If they were proven accurate enough, it’s very likely they could strike a US carrier. Probably they couldn’t sink it, but they could cause it to catch fire and limp away. That would be a tremendous blow to US prestige. Other things they can do: they have tremendous offensive cyber capabilities. They’ve demonstrated capability to take down our water purification distribution system, at least on a regional basis. I would assess that they have the capability to shut down America’s entire critical infrastructure for a period of weeks, perhaps months. And that would be devastating to the US. I don’t think there’s anyone that doubts they have that capability. In terms of nuclear capabilities, I assess that they likely already have nuclear weapons. Whether they have the miniaturisation technology necessary to put them atop missiles is unclear. But I think it’s likely they had a nuclear test in North Korea as recently as 2017. They also may likely have super EMP satellites. Super EMP is a way that Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran could potentially take out all US critical infrastructure at the beginning of a conflict, or even, in the case of Russia or China, before a nuclear first strike against the United States. So those are all devastating capabilities that could potentially kill tens of millions of Americans. And there’s not a lot the US can do about it, because US leaders have spent so much time with offensive power projection, with conventional forces around the world, and neglected our homeland and strategic defences here at home.’ -David Pyne, Deputy Director of the US Task Force on National and Homeland Security, on Going Underground

Afshin Rattansi

80,346 次观看 • 8 个月前

Iran-Israel Before the First Salvo Dual-launcher Khaybar Shekan would likely represent one of Iran’s most consequential assets in the initial phase of any high intensity conflict, primarily because of its mobility, payload efficiency, and psychological deterrent value. In an opening exchange, such systems are best suited to shaping the battlespace by stressing an adversary’s air defence architecture and signalling escalation dominance. For the second phase, the entire battlefield would revolve around the survivability and employment of heavier systems, such as Khorramshahr, which could add deterrence value due to its range and payload capacity. Recent Israeli operational patterns indicate a strong emphasis on early neutralization of launch platforms, storage sites, and command and control nodes, reflecting a doctrine that prioritizes degrading Iran's ability to coordinate and sustain follow-on strikes. In these circumstances, the effectiveness of Iran’s offensive firepower would likely be determined by its approach to the opening window of the conflict. A reactive posture would risk rapid attrition of key assets before they could be fully leveraged. Israel’s initial offensive would be multi domain, synchronised, and more comprehensive than in previous standoffs and would likely strip much of the intensity and coherence from Iran’s offensive capabilities. This is where a Pre-emptive and comprehensive SEAD (Suppression of Enemy Air Defences) framework would become strategically decisive. A pre-emptive strike would be less about achieving immediate tactical damage and more about shaping the battlespace itself. Disruption of the adversary’s kill chain, specifically by degrading ISR coverage, disrupting communications architecture, and interfering with the targeting timelines. This would reduce the exposure and create the operational space necessary for missile forces and other strike elements to function more freely during the critical opening phase.

Talha Ahmad

53,428 次观看 • 8 个月前

This video showcases Iran's largest power plant, capable of producing around 2,880 megawatts of electricity, which serves as a vital component of Iran's energy infrastructure. This plant supplies power not just for industrial operations but also for the everyday residential needs of millions of Iranians. It stands as a symbol of Iran's energy independence, and its destruction would deal a massive blow to the country's ability to function normally. If Iran chooses to escalate tensions by launching a ballistic missile attack on Israel today, they must be fully prepared for the inevitable and unprecedented retaliation from Israel. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) will not hesitate to strike at the heart of Iran's power grid, targeting this very power plant along with many others, plunging the nation into darkness and chaos. Such a decisive strike would serve to humiliate the Ayatollahs and force their hand, potentially opening the floodgates for a wider conflict in which Israel will target not just energy infrastructure but also Iran’s critical refineries and nuclear facilities. The IDF's response will be relentless and uncompromising. Israel has one of the most advanced air forces in the world, equipped with precision-guided missiles and the latest technology, making these power plants, refineries, and even Iran’s nuclear sites easy targets for destruction. Any strike on Israel by Iran will be met with overwhelming force, as Israel exercises its right to self-defense and ensures that the Ayatollahs and their regime understand the consequences of their aggression. This isn't merely a matter of retaliatory strikes; it's about sending a clear and unambiguous message that Iran's support for terrorist organizations like Hezbollah and Hamas, and any direct attack on Israel, will be met with devastating consequences. If Iran decides to open this Pandora's box, the Ayatollahs must understand that Israel will have no hesitation in cutting off Iran's power supply, not just metaphorically but quite literally, by dismantling the very infrastructure that keeps the country running. The repercussions of such a strike would be catastrophic for Iran. Entire cities could be plunged into darkness, industries would grind to a halt, and the economy could face irreversible damage. This action would not only cripple Iran’s capacity to wage war but would also serve as a lesson that any aggression toward Israel will be answered with overwhelming and unyielding force. Israel possesses the military capability and strategic acumen to execute such a campaign effectively. And should Iran choose the path of confrontation, Israel’s response will not be a mere show of force – it will be a decisive act that might send Iran’s energy infrastructure back to the stone age. This isn’t just a matter of military might; it’s about demonstrating that any act of aggression against Israel will be met with a level of retaliation that could leave Iran in darkness, potentially forever. Therefore, Iran should carefully consider its next moves. A strike against Israel would not only be an act of war but also an invitation for its own devastation. The Ayatollahs must understand that their dreams of expanding their influence across the Middle East through aggression will meet a dead end when faced with the full might of Israel's military response.

Torsten Prochnow

392,685 次观看 • 2 年前

It would seem that Bruce Gray is saying that certain generationally different parts, if assembled in a certain way, could cause a P320 to fire unintentionally. He said he's never seen this problem manifest in the wild but he was apparently able to create such an unsafe situation in testing with various parts. I know Sig makes continuous rolling changes to their guns, some are pretty significant. I documented a number of them with the P365 when I was investigating issues with it years ago. They made significant changes to the fire control parts which addressed most of the concerns I had with the pistol at the time. If what Bruce says is true, that parts like an old take down lever and safety lever being installed in a newer pistol, along with other changes, can cause a situation where the gun fires unintentionally, that needs to be thoroughly investigated. I'm not sure exactly what Bruce is hinting at here as the details are a bit vague, but it sounds potentially serious (about 8 minutes into the video). Towards the end of the video he said in a week or so they would be announcing some new products that would “nibble around the edges”of the issues that might cause problems with the P320… I found that statement to be at odds with other things he said in this video, in particular there’s no way except for one that the P320 can fire unintentionally. He even said he "knows what’s going on" with the P320 and their new products will address these problem(s).🤷‍♂️ As of right now I personally would avoid putting aftermarket slides, strikers and fire controls in my P320's until more information becomes available. I would avoid mix-matching parts between guns. I’ll explain why with a link to another video I discovered where a P320 with an aftermarket slide is doing the exact same thing that the Wyoming Gun Project video showed. I’m also going to track Gray Guns to see what parts they ultimately offer to "fix" the issues Bruce alluded to towards the end of the video. Here's the link to the original video on FB:

Military Arms

61,514 次观看 • 1 年前

I do have an idea, followed by a question. Millions of evangelicals still have their children in the government school system. Get them out now. Having Christian children in the government school system is what theologians of another era would have called sinnity-sin-sin. Not a little smidge of sinnity either. Not really a debatable matter. Stop it. Crash the system. If there ever were to be a true reformation among us, Christians leaving the public school system would form a refugee column that would make the Mississippi River look like a solitary tear running down Horace Mann’s cheek. My question is a simple one, but I will divide it into two questions in just a moment. Here is the first phase of the question: In order for all Christians to get their kids out of the maw of this government school system, what would it take precisely? How many outrages would have to be slathered over the tops of all of our heads before we said something like, “Friend, enough”? How outrageous would such outrages have to get before somebody noticed? How much before everybody noticed? How far down this wormhole do we have to go? Some time, away in the future, the last holdout, some Baptist deacon in Tennessee, will finally acknowledge that when the public school system refused to allow his (politely worded) request for his daughter to opt out of the lab for the pole dancing class, with the football team as the practice audience, they really had “gone too far.” The football team was there because they were all in mandatory sensitivity training, which meant that they had to watch the girls without any catcalling, which they did grumble about a little bit.

Douglas Wilson

102,634 次观看 • 9 个月前

I like Alexis’s more moderate stances usually. However, I really disagree with this take. We all know the ‘genital inspection’ line of policing is bogus. You can tell someone is male - especially women can tell - the vast majority of the time. To suggest otherwise is part of this delusion the trans community feed one another that many of them pass. Even if they near ‘pass’ you can often tell when they speak. Seeing someone in person is also very different. I’m also surprised Alexis doesn’t support this woman’s important and valid reasons for making this decision. The assumption is most transwomen are like Alexis. We all know this is not the case, with up to 80% the AGP type (and growing), of whom are attracted to women. They therefore ESPECIALLY belong nowhere near a women’s gym which some women join as they have been violated or assaulted by men. Neither do gay males, even though they post less of a violent threat. Women shouldn’t even need a reason full stop. PCOS is relatively rare, which a woman can very easily have a discussion with the salesperson upon joining. Due to the natures of this gym, my assumption would be their unique health needs in respect to their female sex would be raised upon joining (eg menopause, endometriosis.) 80-90% of transwomen do not have the ‘surgery.’ And it shouldn’t matter. More importantly, with this ‘ban’ in place (which is the wrong way to put it. It is for females - not ‘males’ to begin with. ‘Ban’ suggests someone was attending and got struck off for some reason), the very males who disrespect it and violate the rule anyways, are the VERY males you want to keep out. They will have zero respect for women’s privacy and needs, making any claim they make of ‘socially being a woman’ is null and void. Social norms exist for a reason. Taboo exists for a reason. Remove the taboo, you create loopholes, and men will inevitably exploit that. If you knew you’d never get caught for stealing groceries.. how many of us would do it, despite it meaning we betray the society and hardworking people in which we live? I also assume this gym may offer female defence classes, boxing, or other contact classes. Does anyone know if it does? What then? Do these males who ‘pass’ get to attend those? No thanks. This is also why I advocate for all government documentation making it clear what your sex at birth is. For an establishment like this, they should require passport or birth cert, or another form of gov ID. The more the ‘genital inspection’ argument perpetuates, the stronger the likelihood this will be the conclusion as women get sick of not being listened to. Be careful what you wish for… No hate to Alexis. Just thought I’d provide my reasoning here. I believe in a ‘moderate’ trans stance, but this really diminishes it. I’m sure there are many transwomen who would agree with the stuff I’ve said and not make these roundabout excuses, which all result in disrespect of female boundaries.

Jack Jewell

149,171 次观看 • 1 年前

The Counter-Strike Content Scene might have a big problem on YouTube... YouTube removed my video for promoting unlicensed gambling despite it NOT containing any mention of gambling / case opening websites. They refuse to back down and at the same time they REFUSE to specify at which time the "promotion" is located. If they don't give us this information, I will not know how to avoid this in the future, and releasing videos becomes quite scary as I risk the removal of the entire channel despite not doing anything wrong intentionally. This is a extremely frustrating problem to have as I see a multitude of channels directly promote gambling sites and nothing is done to them, while at the same time I chose to NOT take gambling website money to avoid problems like this, it makes no sense. The only thing they have provided us is a link to their policy (I will share this in the post below so you can read it too if you want) which states Direct promotion of gambling is not allowed, but I repeat, there was none. As it was a documentary about a Counter-Strike player - Xantares, there were images of him wearing jerseys that had the names of gambling websites on them, but that is not a direct promotion. I'd like to ask the community to like & retweet this for visibility, and ideally if anyone is in contact with a person on the YouTube team that could give us a good faith explanation of what we did wrong, it would really help out not only just me, but the entire community because if I won't be able to release videos due to fear of getting strikes, I will not be the only creator is affected. At the same time I decided to upload the video here, on X, to invite the community to point out if they see how I broke the YT policy. Maybe I and my team just don't see something obvious, that would be the best case scenario... TeamYouTube

Josh Nathan

45,982 次观看 • 8 个月前