Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

While everyone is building Obsidian second brains, this German developer built something that actually runs his business. Seven workflows. A waiting list. Clients paying him to set up their own. That's not a chatbot on his screen. It's his operations team. The one that doesn't sleep, doesn't forget, and...

andreysuperior's profile picture

Superior

15,791 subscribers

324,191 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

A dude who fixes phones for a living built himself an actual Jarvis. I'm not saying "like Jarvis." I'm saying his room wakes up at 5:40 AM and starts doing things by itself. Screens turn on. Invoices go out. Calendar sorts itself. Clients get reminders he never wrote. He's not even in the room yet. He can't code. At all. He talked to AI for one weekend and told it what he wants. That's it. The AI built everything. Now he has an app making $30,000 a month and a system that runs his entire life while he sits there deciding what to do with his day. He quit fixing phones two months ago. Every single person who's seen his setup says the same thing. "I want one." Yeah. Me too. It's free. One evening to set up.
1:11

A dude who fixes phones for a living built himself an actual Jarvis. I'm not saying "like Jarvis." I'm saying his room wakes up at 5:40 AM and starts doing things by itself. Screens turn on. Invoices go out. Calendar sorts itself. Clients get reminders he never wrote. He's not even in the room yet. He can't code. At all. He talked to AI for one weekend and told it what he wants. That's it. The AI built everything. Now he has an app making $30,000 a month and a system that runs his entire life while he sits there deciding what to do with his day. He quit fixing phones two months ago. Every single person who's seen his setup says the same thing. "I want one." Yeah. Me too. It's free. One evening to set up.

Raytar

883,629 views • 3 months ago

15-year-old American made $14,000 in his first month selling a service most marketers have never even heard of. Every time someone searches for a business on Google - the first thing they see is an AI response, not a website and not an ad. ChatGPT gives 5-6 recommendations and if a business isn't there - the customer goes to a competitor without a single click. His secret - AI visibility. He optimized local businesses to appear in ChatGPT responses, Google AI Overview and Meta AI instead of paying for ads that no longer work. He'd walk up to a business owner, show them that their business didn't appear in AI responses and ask if they wanted to fix it. Almost everyone said yes immediately. 8 clients at $800 in the first month, 20 clients in the second - because every satisfied client referred him to someone else. This isn't a marketing problem - it's a visibility problem. And he was the only one solving it in his city.
0:45

15-year-old American made $14,000 in his first month selling a service most marketers have never even heard of. Every time someone searches for a business on Google - the first thing they see is an AI response, not a website and not an ad. ChatGPT gives 5-6 recommendations and if a business isn't there - the customer goes to a competitor without a single click. His secret - AI visibility. He optimized local businesses to appear in ChatGPT responses, Google AI Overview and Meta AI instead of paying for ads that no longer work. He'd walk up to a business owner, show them that their business didn't appear in AI responses and ask if they wanted to fix it. Almost everyone said yes immediately. 8 clients at $800 in the first month, 20 clients in the second - because every satisfied client referred him to someone else. This isn't a marketing problem - it's a visibility problem. And he was the only one solving it in his city.

Noisy

43,115 views • 4 months ago

That's not a dashboard. That's an org chart. He used to pay $15,000/month in salaries. Now he doesn't. 42 AI agents. One canvas. Hundreds of thousands worth of employees, without a single salary. The researcher passes context to the email writer. The call analyst feeds the follow-up drafter. They talk to each other. They compound. That's not 42 separate chatbots. That's an org chart that runs itself. A 10-person ops team costs more than $15,000/month. Lead qualification. Support. Invoices. Reports. Content. Competitor intel. Meeting prep. All automated. All running while he builds the next department. He's on day one of the world's first AI workforce. Most businesses are still on day one of hiring humans to do what this canvas already does.
1:10

That's not a dashboard. That's an org chart. He used to pay $15,000/month in salaries. Now he doesn't. 42 AI agents. One canvas. Hundreds of thousands worth of employees, without a single salary. The researcher passes context to the email writer. The call analyst feeds the follow-up drafter. They talk to each other. They compound. That's not 42 separate chatbots. That's an org chart that runs itself. A 10-person ops team costs more than $15,000/month. Lead qualification. Support. Invoices. Reports. Content. Competitor intel. Meeting prep. All automated. All running while he builds the next department. He's on day one of the world's first AI workforce. Most businesses are still on day one of hiring humans to do what this canvas already does.

Superior

18,024 views • 3 months ago

In 1950 a scientist at Bell Labs admitted, out loud, that he was envious of the geniuses in the offices around him. He was sharing an attic with Claude Shannon. So instead of resenting them, he spent the rest of his career studying exactly what separated the great ones from everyone else, and near the end of his life he laid the whole answer out in a single talk. His name was Richard Hamming. He was honest about where he started. At Los Alamos, he called himself a janitor of science, one of the people who kept things running while the important decisions happened without him. He was, in his own words, plain envious. And rather than swallow it, he turned it into a question. What actually is the difference between the first-class people and the rest of us? His first answer is uncomfortable, because it removes every excuse. It is not luck, though luck plays a part. It is not raw IQ, since plenty of the greats did not test especially well, and Einstein spent seven years in a patent office before anyone noticed him. What it comes down to, again and again, is that the able people simply work on important problems, and they work on them relentlessly, while everyone else stays busy with whatever happens to be in front of them. Then he tells the story that stays with you. For years he ate lunch with the physicists, the Nobel winners, and learned how they thought. One day he turned to a chemist at the table and asked, if what you are working on is not important, and not likely to lead to anything important, why are you working on it? The man was offended. But months later he stopped Hamming in the hallway and admitted the question had gotten under his skin. That chemist went on to run his department and join the National Academy. Of everyone else at that table, Hamming says, he never heard of a single one again. He noticed the same pattern in something as small as an office door. The people who worked with their doors closed got more done in the moment, but ten years later they no longer knew what was worth doing. The ones who left their doors open stayed connected to what actually mattered, even at the cost of constant interruption. And underneath all of it was a habit most people never build. He set aside Friday afternoons, every week, for nothing but great thoughts. No task, no email, just the question of what the important problems in his field really were, and whether he was working on any of them. He was not claiming to be the smartest man in the building. He knew he was not. That was the entire point. He watched the smartest men closely, took what he could use, and made himself into someone who did work that lasted. As he put it near the end, no one ever told him these things. He had to find them alone. You have no such excuse.
44:02

In 1950 a scientist at Bell Labs admitted, out loud, that he was envious of the geniuses in the offices around him. He was sharing an attic with Claude Shannon. So instead of resenting them, he spent the rest of his career studying exactly what separated the great ones from everyone else, and near the end of his life he laid the whole answer out in a single talk. His name was Richard Hamming. He was honest about where he started. At Los Alamos, he called himself a janitor of science, one of the people who kept things running while the important decisions happened without him. He was, in his own words, plain envious. And rather than swallow it, he turned it into a question. What actually is the difference between the first-class people and the rest of us? His first answer is uncomfortable, because it removes every excuse. It is not luck, though luck plays a part. It is not raw IQ, since plenty of the greats did not test especially well, and Einstein spent seven years in a patent office before anyone noticed him. What it comes down to, again and again, is that the able people simply work on important problems, and they work on them relentlessly, while everyone else stays busy with whatever happens to be in front of them. Then he tells the story that stays with you. For years he ate lunch with the physicists, the Nobel winners, and learned how they thought. One day he turned to a chemist at the table and asked, if what you are working on is not important, and not likely to lead to anything important, why are you working on it? The man was offended. But months later he stopped Hamming in the hallway and admitted the question had gotten under his skin. That chemist went on to run his department and join the National Academy. Of everyone else at that table, Hamming says, he never heard of a single one again. He noticed the same pattern in something as small as an office door. The people who worked with their doors closed got more done in the moment, but ten years later they no longer knew what was worth doing. The ones who left their doors open stayed connected to what actually mattered, even at the cost of constant interruption. And underneath all of it was a habit most people never build. He set aside Friday afternoons, every week, for nothing but great thoughts. No task, no email, just the question of what the important problems in his field really were, and whether he was working on any of them. He was not claiming to be the smartest man in the building. He knew he was not. That was the entire point. He watched the smartest men closely, took what he could use, and made himself into someone who did work that lasted. As he put it near the end, no one ever told him these things. He had to find them alone. You have no such excuse.

Zyron

15,886 views • 2 months ago

Josh Ford showed off his MASSIVE skill set on Friday. Seriously, this dude is a STUD. He pulls and kicks, he leads up in the hole, he catches passes, and he doesn't miss when he has a chance to make a play. We need to figure out how to make him as big of a part of the game plan every week as he was on Friday. Super excited about his future at OSU. #GoPokes #OkState
1:32

Josh Ford showed off his MASSIVE skill set on Friday. Seriously, this dude is a STUD. He pulls and kicks, he leads up in the hole, he catches passes, and he doesn't miss when he has a chance to make a play. We need to figure out how to make him as big of a part of the game plan every week as he was on Friday. Super excited about his future at OSU. #GoPokes #OkState

OState Daily

10,848 views • 1 year ago

Everyone calls Fredo the weak one. Watch that scene again. His father gets shot in the street and Fredo freezes. He fumbles his gun, drops it, ends up on the curb crying like a kid. For most people that settles it: he's useless, he's not built for this life. But that's the point. Fredo was never meant to be strong, or smart. He wasn't Sonny. He wasn't Michael. He was an ordinary man who happened to have the Godfather for a father. So when the shooting starts, he does what most of us would do. He panics. He breaks. The same softness that made him a bad gangster was the one thing the family had no room for. Michael runs the business better than any of them ever could. But the day he loses Fredo, he loses the last soft thing left in him. A family can't run on business alone. Fredo was the proof. Nobody saw it until he was gone
0:59

Everyone calls Fredo the weak one. Watch that scene again. His father gets shot in the street and Fredo freezes. He fumbles his gun, drops it, ends up on the curb crying like a kid. For most people that settles it: he's useless, he's not built for this life. But that's the point. Fredo was never meant to be strong, or smart. He wasn't Sonny. He wasn't Michael. He was an ordinary man who happened to have the Godfather for a father. So when the shooting starts, he does what most of us would do. He panics. He breaks. The same softness that made him a bad gangster was the one thing the family had no room for. Michael runs the business better than any of them ever could. But the day he loses Fredo, he loses the last soft thing left in him. A family can't run on business alone. Fredo was the proof. Nobody saw it until he was gone

best of mafia cinema

96,650 views • 2 months ago

LISTEN to Starmer deny feeling ANGRY or BITTER, because, in his own words, it's an incredible privilege to be PM. Not a flicker of it. Not a single crack in the calm. Listen to what that word actually means to him. Not service. Not duty. PRIVILEGE, like the country was handed to him to keep, not lent to him to run. HIS country, to dictate exactly how he likes, and he will not be told otherwise. Of course there isn't. Arrogant. Narcissistic. Pathological in his grip on power. Nothing where a conscience should be. Funny, then, that twice in three months he's told his own party the exact same thing, word for word almost, like he rehearsed it and liked how it sounded. Calm men don't need the line twice. He's clinging on so hard he's reciting himself. He will not resign, not for the resignations, not for the disgrace, not for ninety-five of his own MPs telling him to go. Because the country was never the point. He was. That's what he calls PRIVILEGE. The smallest mandate of any majority government in TWO HUNDRED YEARS. MINUS 46 approval. Ninety-five of his OWN MPs telling him to get out. He felt none of it. He still doesn't. An ego this big can't grasp that a country hates him, it just hears the word PRIVILEGE and feels nothing else. He blocked Burnham, broke his word doing it, and now wants him back in cabinet like none of it happened. His own chief of staff walked out in DISGRACE, over a man Starmer put in power against an official WARNING. McSweeney didn't dress it up. He said Mandelson had wrecked the party, the country, and trust in politics itself. Starmer's reply to that wasn't shame. It was a THANK YOU NOTE. He never actually left. Back on the phone to him every day. Back inside Number 10. Wargaming how Starmer keeps his job. The resignation was theatre. The corruption stayed. Police searched his own appointee's homes. MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE. While that was happening on the news, he was sat there telling Beth Rigby it's a PRIVILEGE. The same lie runs through everything else he calls privilege. He calls it a better relationship with the EU. It isn't a relationship. It's Britain crawling back into the exact rules it voted to leave, dressed up so nobody in government has to say the word rejoin out loud. He hid digital ID behind your children's safety. Larry Ellison, who put £270 MILLION into Tony Blair's institute, told investors citizens would behave because they're being watched. Blair's ministers met Ellison's people 29 times in nine months. That's not child protection. That's a contract. It's the same playbook every Western government is running, the EU, Australia, half of America state by state, all building the same digital ID infrastructure behind the same children's safety story, their own regulators admitting they're working together on it. He's just reading his part. That's not privilege. That's a man who mistook a country for something he's owed. That's not service. That's ownership dressed up as humility. He said there's no anger in him. There doesn't need to be. A man who already thinks he owns the country has nothing left to be angry about. That's a man with DEAD EYES, standing in the wreckage of everything he's broken, SMILING, and calling it an HONOUR. EXPOSED.
0:47

LISTEN to Starmer deny feeling ANGRY or BITTER, because, in his own words, it's an incredible privilege to be PM. Not a flicker of it. Not a single crack in the calm. Listen to what that word actually means to him. Not service. Not duty. PRIVILEGE, like the country was handed to him to keep, not lent to him to run. HIS country, to dictate exactly how he likes, and he will not be told otherwise. Of course there isn't. Arrogant. Narcissistic. Pathological in his grip on power. Nothing where a conscience should be. Funny, then, that twice in three months he's told his own party the exact same thing, word for word almost, like he rehearsed it and liked how it sounded. Calm men don't need the line twice. He's clinging on so hard he's reciting himself. He will not resign, not for the resignations, not for the disgrace, not for ninety-five of his own MPs telling him to go. Because the country was never the point. He was. That's what he calls PRIVILEGE. The smallest mandate of any majority government in TWO HUNDRED YEARS. MINUS 46 approval. Ninety-five of his OWN MPs telling him to get out. He felt none of it. He still doesn't. An ego this big can't grasp that a country hates him, it just hears the word PRIVILEGE and feels nothing else. He blocked Burnham, broke his word doing it, and now wants him back in cabinet like none of it happened. His own chief of staff walked out in DISGRACE, over a man Starmer put in power against an official WARNING. McSweeney didn't dress it up. He said Mandelson had wrecked the party, the country, and trust in politics itself. Starmer's reply to that wasn't shame. It was a THANK YOU NOTE. He never actually left. Back on the phone to him every day. Back inside Number 10. Wargaming how Starmer keeps his job. The resignation was theatre. The corruption stayed. Police searched his own appointee's homes. MISCONDUCT IN PUBLIC OFFICE. While that was happening on the news, he was sat there telling Beth Rigby it's a PRIVILEGE. The same lie runs through everything else he calls privilege. He calls it a better relationship with the EU. It isn't a relationship. It's Britain crawling back into the exact rules it voted to leave, dressed up so nobody in government has to say the word rejoin out loud. He hid digital ID behind your children's safety. Larry Ellison, who put £270 MILLION into Tony Blair's institute, told investors citizens would behave because they're being watched. Blair's ministers met Ellison's people 29 times in nine months. That's not child protection. That's a contract. It's the same playbook every Western government is running, the EU, Australia, half of America state by state, all building the same digital ID infrastructure behind the same children's safety story, their own regulators admitting they're working together on it. He's just reading his part. That's not privilege. That's a man who mistook a country for something he's owed. That's not service. That's ownership dressed up as humility. He said there's no anger in him. There doesn't need to be. A man who already thinks he owns the country has nothing left to be angry about. That's a man with DEAD EYES, standing in the wreckage of everything he's broken, SMILING, and calling it an HONOUR. EXPOSED.

BanksyCat

53,865 views • 3 months ago

He started using Claude AI and made $25,000 in his first month The guy could not even hide how much it changed his life. He paid for Claude and treated it like a real business partner. Built workflows that automate client work, content and outreach all in one place. What used to take him 12 hours a day now takes 2. He started taking on triple the clients without burning out once. At $5,000 per client and five clients a month, the numbers move fast. That is $25,000 landing in his account from a tool that costs $20. Most people use Claude to write captions and call it a day. He used it to rebuild his entire income from the ground up. Follow if you want the exact workflows he uses to scale this.
0:46

He started using Claude AI and made $25,000 in his first month The guy could not even hide how much it changed his life. He paid for Claude and treated it like a real business partner. Built workflows that automate client work, content and outreach all in one place. What used to take him 12 hours a day now takes 2. He started taking on triple the clients without burning out once. At $5,000 per client and five clients a month, the numbers move fast. That is $25,000 landing in his account from a tool that costs $20. Most people use Claude to write captions and call it a day. He used it to rebuild his entire income from the ground up. Follow if you want the exact workflows he uses to scale this.

winkle.

21,373 views • 3 months ago

A 15 year old American walked into a barbershop and asked the owner to google his own business. The owner laughed and said why would I google myself, I know where I am. The kid said just do it. He did. His barbershop didn't show up. Not in the AI answer at the top of Google. Not in ChatGPT when you ask for the best barbershop nearby. Not in Meta AI. Three AI systems that millions of people use to find local businesses and his shop was invisible in all of them. The kid turned his phone around and showed him what does show up. His competitor two blocks away. Worse reviews, fewer years in business. But that guy appeared in every AI recommendation because his website had the right structure. The barber stopped laughing. The kid said: I can fix this. $800. Give me one week. He learned the whole thing from Claude Code three months earlier. Asked one question: how do people find local businesses now and what's changing? Claude explained that AI systems are replacing traditional search and most local businesses aren't optimized for it because most marketers don't even know it's happening yet. Claude Code built him a tool that checks whether any business appears in AI responses across ChatGPT, Google AI Overview and Meta AI. He types in a business name and sees exactly where they're visible and where they're not. Then Claude taught him how to fix it. He walked into the barbershop with the problem and the solution already in his pocket. 8 clients at $800 each in month one. Every satisfied owner referred him to the next one. The barbershop told the dry cleaner. The dentist told the orthodontist. The car wash told the tire shop. He didn't run a single ad. $14,000 in month one. By month two he stopped walking into businesses. They were calling him. He's 15. Can't drive to his clients. His mom drops him off and waits in the car while he walks into a business with a laptop and walks out 20 minutes later with an $800 contract. She asked him last week what he actually does in there. He said I show people that they're invisible and then I make them visible. She said that sounds like a scam. He showed her his bank account. She stopped calling it a scam. Most marketers are still selling Facebook ads and SEO packages. This kid is selling something they haven't figured out exists yet. AI visibility. The new front door to every business. And he's the only one in his city with the key. He found that key by asking Claude Code one question. The answer built him a $14,000 a month business before he got his learner's permit.
0:45

A 15 year old American walked into a barbershop and asked the owner to google his own business. The owner laughed and said why would I google myself, I know where I am. The kid said just do it. He did. His barbershop didn't show up. Not in the AI answer at the top of Google. Not in ChatGPT when you ask for the best barbershop nearby. Not in Meta AI. Three AI systems that millions of people use to find local businesses and his shop was invisible in all of them. The kid turned his phone around and showed him what does show up. His competitor two blocks away. Worse reviews, fewer years in business. But that guy appeared in every AI recommendation because his website had the right structure. The barber stopped laughing. The kid said: I can fix this. $800. Give me one week. He learned the whole thing from Claude Code three months earlier. Asked one question: how do people find local businesses now and what's changing? Claude explained that AI systems are replacing traditional search and most local businesses aren't optimized for it because most marketers don't even know it's happening yet. Claude Code built him a tool that checks whether any business appears in AI responses across ChatGPT, Google AI Overview and Meta AI. He types in a business name and sees exactly where they're visible and where they're not. Then Claude taught him how to fix it. He walked into the barbershop with the problem and the solution already in his pocket. 8 clients at $800 each in month one. Every satisfied owner referred him to the next one. The barbershop told the dry cleaner. The dentist told the orthodontist. The car wash told the tire shop. He didn't run a single ad. $14,000 in month one. By month two he stopped walking into businesses. They were calling him. He's 15. Can't drive to his clients. His mom drops him off and waits in the car while he walks into a business with a laptop and walks out 20 minutes later with an $800 contract. She asked him last week what he actually does in there. He said I show people that they're invisible and then I make them visible. She said that sounds like a scam. He showed her his bank account. She stopped calling it a scam. Most marketers are still selling Facebook ads and SEO packages. This kid is selling something they haven't figured out exists yet. AI visibility. The new front door to every business. And he's the only one in his city with the key. He found that key by asking Claude Code one question. The answer built him a $14,000 a month business before he got his learner's permit.

Marlow

69,200 views • 4 months ago

WOAH 🚨 Democrat California Governor Candidate Eric Swalwell was told her could not purchase items with campaign funds by the FTC and he DID IT ANYWAY He also used $84,000 in funds on a personal trip to Qatar, AFTER BEING TOLD IT WAS ILLEGAL He then forced staffers to sign NDAs “Democrat Eric Swalwell should be going to jail. Now, he's not going to because we don't punish politicians in our justice system. But guys, not only did he get caught paying from his campaign funds nearly $300,000 to his wife for watching their own child, but he actually submitted a written request to the FEC before he did this, asking if that was legal. And the FEC replied, no, that's a crime. And he did it anyway. On top of that, he actually asked the FEC whether or not he could buy a suite for the Washington Nationals from his campaign funds. And again, they told him no in writing and he fucking did it anyway, spending tens of thousands of dollars on it of campaign funds. And then he asked the FEC if he could spend $84,000 on a personal trip to Qatar. They said no, and he did it anyway. And to top it all off, he's apparently f*cking all his staffers and interns and having them sign NDAs to keep quiet, that should be enough to send somebody to jail because like he doesn't even get to play the, oh, I didn't know card because he submitted requests to do this in writing and was told in writing. No, Eric, that would be a crime.”
1:20

WOAH 🚨 Democrat California Governor Candidate Eric Swalwell was told her could not purchase items with campaign funds by the FTC and he DID IT ANYWAY He also used $84,000 in funds on a personal trip to Qatar, AFTER BEING TOLD IT WAS ILLEGAL He then forced staffers to sign NDAs “Democrat Eric Swalwell should be going to jail. Now, he's not going to because we don't punish politicians in our justice system. But guys, not only did he get caught paying from his campaign funds nearly $300,000 to his wife for watching their own child, but he actually submitted a written request to the FEC before he did this, asking if that was legal. And the FEC replied, no, that's a crime. And he did it anyway. On top of that, he actually asked the FEC whether or not he could buy a suite for the Washington Nationals from his campaign funds. And again, they told him no in writing and he fucking did it anyway, spending tens of thousands of dollars on it of campaign funds. And then he asked the FEC if he could spend $84,000 on a personal trip to Qatar. They said no, and he did it anyway. And to top it all off, he's apparently f*cking all his staffers and interns and having them sign NDAs to keep quiet, that should be enough to send somebody to jail because like he doesn't even get to play the, oh, I didn't know card because he submitted requests to do this in writing and was told in writing. No, Eric, that would be a crime.”

Wall Street Apes

183,251 views • 5 months ago

i genuinely don't understand why this isn't shown to anyone who has ever said the words "they should just." a nobel laureate sat on live television in 1977 and explained why nobody alive knows enough to fix anything. his name is friedrich hayek. he took the nobel prize in economics three years before this. he wrote the road to serfdom in the middle of the second world war and it has never once been out of print. he was seventy eight when he agreed to do this live, in front of a panel, with one camera and no edit. he gets one question in the first minute. the answer he gives is not a policy, and it is not a number. he is sitting in 1977 describing something that arrives five years later, and he does it without a single hedge. there is one sentence about prices that the whole hour rests on. it takes him about nine seconds and i went back and played it thrice. then he says something about unemployment figures that i don't think any economist would put his name to on camera today. watch buckley's face rather than his. fifty seven minutes, one camera, no edits, no breaks. it went out once in 1977 and i cannot work out why almost nobody has sat through it since.
57:31

i genuinely don't understand why this isn't shown to anyone who has ever said the words "they should just." a nobel laureate sat on live television in 1977 and explained why nobody alive knows enough to fix anything. his name is friedrich hayek. he took the nobel prize in economics three years before this. he wrote the road to serfdom in the middle of the second world war and it has never once been out of print. he was seventy eight when he agreed to do this live, in front of a panel, with one camera and no edit. he gets one question in the first minute. the answer he gives is not a policy, and it is not a number. he is sitting in 1977 describing something that arrives five years later, and he does it without a single hedge. there is one sentence about prices that the whole hour rests on. it takes him about nine seconds and i went back and played it thrice. then he says something about unemployment figures that i don't think any economist would put his name to on camera today. watch buckley's face rather than his. fifty seven minutes, one camera, no edits, no breaks. it went out once in 1977 and i cannot work out why almost nobody has sat through it since.

Zyron

59,574 views • 1 month ago

Microsoft spent $13 billion and 3 years building an AI that knows your work context. Every time you open it, it still asks what you're working on. This developer set up a plain text file in 2 minutes. The file is called CLAUDE.md. It loads before every session. Before he types a single word. It already knows his name. It already knows his writing style. It already knows what he's building, who it's for, and what he never wants to see in a response. He doesn't introduce himself anymore. He doesn't explain his preferences anymore. He doesn't correct the same mistakes twice. He just works. No $30/month Copilot subscription. No Microsoft 365. No IT approval. No data sharing agreement. No onboarding. Just a plain text file, a free text editor, and 21 instructions a developer distilled from Andrej Karpathy's research. Those 21 instructions moved Claude's coding accuracy from 65% to 94%. The file hit #1 on GitHub with 82,000 stars. Most people using Claude right now have never heard of it. Microsoft has 221,000 employees, $13 billion invested in OpenAI, and a direct integration into every Windows laptop sold on the planet.. they built an AI assistant most companies pay $30/user/month for that still doesn't know your name. This developer has a laptop, a text file and a 2-minute setup.. he built something that knows more about how he works than any enterprise AI on the market. The $50 billion AI personalization industry just got embarrassed by a .md file. full breakdown down below
0:44

Microsoft spent $13 billion and 3 years building an AI that knows your work context. Every time you open it, it still asks what you're working on. This developer set up a plain text file in 2 minutes. The file is called CLAUDE.md. It loads before every session. Before he types a single word. It already knows his name. It already knows his writing style. It already knows what he's building, who it's for, and what he never wants to see in a response. He doesn't introduce himself anymore. He doesn't explain his preferences anymore. He doesn't correct the same mistakes twice. He just works. No $30/month Copilot subscription. No Microsoft 365. No IT approval. No data sharing agreement. No onboarding. Just a plain text file, a free text editor, and 21 instructions a developer distilled from Andrej Karpathy's research. Those 21 instructions moved Claude's coding accuracy from 65% to 94%. The file hit #1 on GitHub with 82,000 stars. Most people using Claude right now have never heard of it. Microsoft has 221,000 employees, $13 billion invested in OpenAI, and a direct integration into every Windows laptop sold on the planet.. they built an AI assistant most companies pay $30/user/month for that still doesn't know your name. This developer has a laptop, a text file and a 2-minute setup.. he built something that knows more about how he works than any enterprise AI on the market. The $50 billion AI personalization industry just got embarrassed by a .md file. full breakdown down below

Dep

14,179 views • 4 months ago

Also, there's a specific part that was completely misunderstood and taken entirely out of context! CHANYEOL was just explaining that he was super thin at debut (1st pic), then got obsessed with bulking up after his military discharge (2nd pic). He already shared before that he went through a hard time back then, and in this clip, he was JUST ADDRESSING the fans' reactions to that period. Then, he found a healthy, balanced routine that got him to his current body (last pic) which he achieved entirely for himself and because HE wanted to, NOT because it’s what fans preferred When one of the MCs asked him about fan preferences, he just answered that they usually like lean figures (WHICH IS WAY TOO FAR FROM HIS CURRENT BUILD). He was literally just answering a question, NOT saying that’s how he OR the members supposed to look! He was just saying he advised the members not to get too obsessed with bulking up THE WAY HE DID! He was referring to the unhealthy mindset and habits that came with it. He NEVER once told them to lose weight “가시” The build that fans prefer is something that neither CHANYEOL NOR any of the members look like, AND HE NEVER told anyone to look like that. I just hope people watch the full video and understand the full context instead of relying on mistranslations and misinformation that take his words completely OUT OF CONTEXT 🙏
1:35

Also, there's a specific part that was completely misunderstood and taken entirely out of context! CHANYEOL was just explaining that he was super thin at debut (1st pic), then got obsessed with bulking up after his military discharge (2nd pic). He already shared before that he went through a hard time back then, and in this clip, he was JUST ADDRESSING the fans' reactions to that period. Then, he found a healthy, balanced routine that got him to his current body (last pic) which he achieved entirely for himself and because HE wanted to, NOT because it’s what fans preferred When one of the MCs asked him about fan preferences, he just answered that they usually like lean figures (WHICH IS WAY TOO FAR FROM HIS CURRENT BUILD). He was literally just answering a question, NOT saying that’s how he OR the members supposed to look! He was just saying he advised the members not to get too obsessed with bulking up THE WAY HE DID! He was referring to the unhealthy mindset and habits that came with it. He NEVER once told them to lose weight “가시” The build that fans prefer is something that neither CHANYEOL NOR any of the members look like, AND HE NEVER told anyone to look like that. I just hope people watch the full video and understand the full context instead of relying on mistranslations and misinformation that take his words completely OUT OF CONTEXT 🙏

PCY BASE

10,958 views • 2 months ago

A guy put a mini PC on his desk and runs a wall of faceless YouTube channels from it. The box is the size of a paperback. Sits next to his coffee. He plugged it in and that was it. Now every channel on his screen uploads on schedule without him. He doesn't film. He doesn't edit. He doesn't even open YouTube most days. He says one channel lands him around $8,000 a month. He scrolled past dozens just now. The box paid for itself in 3 days. His rent is now fully paid by a box on his desk. The crazy part is regular people are quietly becoming media networks. Save this, you are watching the next gold rush hit the home office.
0:30

A guy put a mini PC on his desk and runs a wall of faceless YouTube channels from it. The box is the size of a paperback. Sits next to his coffee. He plugged it in and that was it. Now every channel on his screen uploads on schedule without him. He doesn't film. He doesn't edit. He doesn't even open YouTube most days. He says one channel lands him around $8,000 a month. He scrolled past dozens just now. The box paid for itself in 3 days. His rent is now fully paid by a box on his desk. The crazy part is regular people are quietly becoming media networks. Save this, you are watching the next gold rush hit the home office.

Superior

24,476 views • 3 months ago

F**KING INSANE, GROK BOT SPOKE A DYING LANGUAGE BACK TO THE LAST MAN WHO SPEAKS IT, AND HE DID NOT RECOGNISE 41 OF HIS OWN WORDS after day 3 we had 11 grammar rules left and no way to test them. elias is the only judge alive. somebody in the replies said it after day 1: you do not need more tape, you need the same sentence twice. so we built one and played it to him out loud day 4, what the crew found: → GRAM assembled nine words that use all 11 rules. that sentence exists on none of the 212 hours → VOICE said it out loud in his own voice, built out of 45 hours of him → he went still for eleven seconds. then he answered it. in the language → he corrected one ending. rule 7 was wrong. three seconds, and he could not say how he knew → he asked to hear it again. then he talked to it for twenty minutes → CHIEF ran a control while he talked: 200 words pulled off his own tapes, read back to him → 41 he did not recognise. said those are not words. twelve of them he said himself, on tape, six days ago WORDS SAVED 5,340 · RULES LEFT 11 · CORRECTED BY HIM 1 · HIS OWN WORDS HE NO LONGER KNOWS 41 · SPEAKERS LEFT 1 we thought we were racing to record a language before its last speaker dies. we are not racing him. we passed him. the archive holds 41 words he lost this year somebody asked under day 1 why we do not just talk to him. tonight something did. for twenty minutes elias had someone answering him in his own language for the first time since 1994, and it was software that learned it from him last week DAY 4
0:35

F**KING INSANE, GROK BOT SPOKE A DYING LANGUAGE BACK TO THE LAST MAN WHO SPEAKS IT, AND HE DID NOT RECOGNISE 41 OF HIS OWN WORDS after day 3 we had 11 grammar rules left and no way to test them. elias is the only judge alive. somebody in the replies said it after day 1: you do not need more tape, you need the same sentence twice. so we built one and played it to him out loud day 4, what the crew found: → GRAM assembled nine words that use all 11 rules. that sentence exists on none of the 212 hours → VOICE said it out loud in his own voice, built out of 45 hours of him → he went still for eleven seconds. then he answered it. in the language → he corrected one ending. rule 7 was wrong. three seconds, and he could not say how he knew → he asked to hear it again. then he talked to it for twenty minutes → CHIEF ran a control while he talked: 200 words pulled off his own tapes, read back to him → 41 he did not recognise. said those are not words. twelve of them he said himself, on tape, six days ago WORDS SAVED 5,340 · RULES LEFT 11 · CORRECTED BY HIM 1 · HIS OWN WORDS HE NO LONGER KNOWS 41 · SPEAKERS LEFT 1 we thought we were racing to record a language before its last speaker dies. we are not racing him. we passed him. the archive holds 41 words he lost this year somebody asked under day 1 why we do not just talk to him. tonight something did. for twenty minutes elias had someone answering him in his own language for the first time since 1994, and it was software that learned it from him last week DAY 4

Ventry

45,082 views • 15 days ago

A 26-year-old guy from China runs an agency that gains over 1,000,000 followers a year, and not a single one of his streams is actually live. he started as a real streamer, on camera every night, and made almost nothing. the moment he stopped, the caps stopped. a shop that closes when you sleep isn't a business, it's a shift. so he stopped going live. he built a rig that only looks live: > two vertical 4K monitors looping a clean pre-recorded product demo > phones on tripods filming the screens through anti-moiré glass > TikTok Shop links wired to every "stream" > one operator minding a rack of them instead of a camera the trick was never the tech. it was the reframe: a live-commerce stream never had to be live. it had to sell. a good demo, looped clean, closed the same at 4am as it did at noon. then he ran it for other people. brands handed him their catalog, he spun up always-on storefronts across a dozen accounts, and took a cut of every sale the loops closed. the $100,000 a year didn't come from being on camera. they came the night he realized the camera was the only part that needed a human, so he removed it.
1:45

A 26-year-old guy from China runs an agency that gains over 1,000,000 followers a year, and not a single one of his streams is actually live. he started as a real streamer, on camera every night, and made almost nothing. the moment he stopped, the caps stopped. a shop that closes when you sleep isn't a business, it's a shift. so he stopped going live. he built a rig that only looks live: > two vertical 4K monitors looping a clean pre-recorded product demo > phones on tripods filming the screens through anti-moiré glass > TikTok Shop links wired to every "stream" > one operator minding a rack of them instead of a camera the trick was never the tech. it was the reframe: a live-commerce stream never had to be live. it had to sell. a good demo, looped clean, closed the same at 4am as it did at noon. then he ran it for other people. brands handed him their catalog, he spun up always-on storefronts across a dozen accounts, and took a cut of every sale the loops closed. the $100,000 a year didn't come from being on camera. they came the night he realized the camera was the only part that needed a human, so he removed it.

Nekt0

21,566 views • 2 months ago

🚨MUST WATCH: Palm Beach Pete Just Took A Lie Detector Test And Failed Miserably Results That Prove He's Hiding Something.📈❌ Palm Beach Pete, in a desperate attempt to prove he is NOT Jeffrey Epstein, just took a lie detector test and FAILED IT MISERABLY. He was caught being deceptive on the most critical question of all: "Have you and Jeffrey Epstein ever been in the same room together?" Watch him squirm. First, he tries to downplay it: "I was at a party and he was at that party. I never spoke to him. I never met him." Then, when pressed, he admits: "So the answer is yes, the answer was yes. I was in a room and he was in the same room." And the polygrapher's devastating response? "No, I'm getting a little deception there." Pete's final, pathetic words? "What can I tell you?" I don't know the truth! You don't know the truth? A man goes on national television, desperate to clear his name from the biggest conspiracy of the century, and his final defense is "I don't know the truth"? That's not a denial. That's a confession. This is the most pathetic attempt at a cover-up we have ever seen. An innocent man doesn't fail a polygraph about his connection to the person he supposedly looks like. An innocent man doesn't fumble his own story. An innocent man doesn't end his defense by claiming he doesn't know the truth. He failed the test. He was caught in a lie. He has the same face, the same teeth, the same tattoo, the same locations, the same "partnerships," and now, he has a failed polygraph to his name. How much more proof does the world need? They faked Epstein's death, and this bumbling fool is the result. He failed the lie detector test. Share this everywhere. The truth is coming out, whether they like it or not. 🇺🇸⚓️ From: Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
0:32

🚨MUST WATCH: Palm Beach Pete Just Took A Lie Detector Test And Failed Miserably Results That Prove He's Hiding Something.📈❌ Palm Beach Pete, in a desperate attempt to prove he is NOT Jeffrey Epstein, just took a lie detector test and FAILED IT MISERABLY. He was caught being deceptive on the most critical question of all: "Have you and Jeffrey Epstein ever been in the same room together?" Watch him squirm. First, he tries to downplay it: "I was at a party and he was at that party. I never spoke to him. I never met him." Then, when pressed, he admits: "So the answer is yes, the answer was yes. I was in a room and he was in the same room." And the polygrapher's devastating response? "No, I'm getting a little deception there." Pete's final, pathetic words? "What can I tell you?" I don't know the truth! You don't know the truth? A man goes on national television, desperate to clear his name from the biggest conspiracy of the century, and his final defense is "I don't know the truth"? That's not a denial. That's a confession. This is the most pathetic attempt at a cover-up we have ever seen. An innocent man doesn't fail a polygraph about his connection to the person he supposedly looks like. An innocent man doesn't fumble his own story. An innocent man doesn't end his defense by claiming he doesn't know the truth. He failed the test. He was caught in a lie. He has the same face, the same teeth, the same tattoo, the same locations, the same "partnerships," and now, he has a failed polygraph to his name. How much more proof does the world need? They faked Epstein's death, and this bumbling fool is the result. He failed the lie detector test. Share this everywhere. The truth is coming out, whether they like it or not. 🇺🇸⚓️ From: Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Project Constitution

582,793 views • 5 months ago

A 23-year-old made $5,000 last month from AI. No employees. No office. He didn't write a single line of code. While you're still "thinking about getting into AI," he picked three tiny lanes and quietly took them. Lane 1 — Micro SaaS. He found one thing people pay to do by hand. Built one AI tool that does it in a click. Not a platform. One feature. $19/month, 300 people paying, and he hasn't touched it in weeks. Lane 2 — Productized AI agents. He built an AI agent that answers a dentist's phone, books the patient, and texts the confirmation. Set up once. The clinic pays $1,200 a month to keep it alive. He has nine of them now. He's never met a single patient. Lane 3 — Prompt libraries. He packaged the prompts that actually work "30 hooks that go viral," "50 cold emails that get replies" - into one file. Made it once. Sells it forever. Same file, every day, while he sleeps. Now the part that should sting a little. He didn't invent anything. The tools are free. The skills are free. AI does the hard part now. The only thing left to own is the niche and there are millions of them sitting wide open while everyone fights to build the next big app nobody asked for. He's not smarter than you. He just stopped scrolling and picked a lane. You're still scrolling.
0:49

A 23-year-old made $5,000 last month from AI. No employees. No office. He didn't write a single line of code. While you're still "thinking about getting into AI," he picked three tiny lanes and quietly took them. Lane 1 — Micro SaaS. He found one thing people pay to do by hand. Built one AI tool that does it in a click. Not a platform. One feature. $19/month, 300 people paying, and he hasn't touched it in weeks. Lane 2 — Productized AI agents. He built an AI agent that answers a dentist's phone, books the patient, and texts the confirmation. Set up once. The clinic pays $1,200 a month to keep it alive. He has nine of them now. He's never met a single patient. Lane 3 — Prompt libraries. He packaged the prompts that actually work "30 hooks that go viral," "50 cold emails that get replies" - into one file. Made it once. Sells it forever. Same file, every day, while he sleeps. Now the part that should sting a little. He didn't invent anything. The tools are free. The skills are free. AI does the hard part now. The only thing left to own is the niche and there are millions of them sitting wide open while everyone fights to build the next big app nobody asked for. He's not smarter than you. He just stopped scrolling and picked a lane. You're still scrolling.

Rich

11,453 views • 3 months ago

A 22-year-old automated his entire YouTube channel using Claude. $8,000 a month. He doesn't even touch the videos. No camera. No editing. No burnout. Just Claude. He opens it once and tells it what to do. Claude handles everything: > finds trending topics in his niche > writes titles and descriptions built for the algorithm > generates full video scripts > creates tags, timestamps, promotional posts One prompt. One channel. One person. $8,000 a month running on autopilot. The channel works while he sleeps. While he eats. While he lives his life. Most people still think YouTube means filming, editing, grinding for years before seeing a dollar. He just taught an AI to do it for him. And while you're reading this — his channel is already getting views. The craziest part? He's not a developer. Not a tech guy. Not some Silicon Valley genius. He's just someone who stopped overcomplicating it. The tools exist. The opportunity is wide open. The only question is why it's still not you.
1:28

A 22-year-old automated his entire YouTube channel using Claude. $8,000 a month. He doesn't even touch the videos. No camera. No editing. No burnout. Just Claude. He opens it once and tells it what to do. Claude handles everything: > finds trending topics in his niche > writes titles and descriptions built for the algorithm > generates full video scripts > creates tags, timestamps, promotional posts One prompt. One channel. One person. $8,000 a month running on autopilot. The channel works while he sleeps. While he eats. While he lives his life. Most people still think YouTube means filming, editing, grinding for years before seeing a dollar. He just taught an AI to do it for him. And while you're reading this — his channel is already getting views. The craziest part? He's not a developer. Not a tech guy. Not some Silicon Valley genius. He's just someone who stopped overcomplicating it. The tools exist. The opportunity is wide open. The only question is why it's still not you.

Shelpid.WI3M

183,317 views • 4 months ago

During a previous appearance on the Full Send Podcast, Tucker Carlson asserted with absolute certainty that Epstein was murdered. Tucker said a friend of his was one of the last people to talk to Epstein before he was killed. The friend told Tucker that Epstein truly believed he was getting out of prison. “A friend of mine, one of the people who last talked to him on the phone the day he was killed, and he had an expectation of a bail hearing in two days.” “He thought he was getting out. He was not despondent at all. I talked to his lawyer, told me the same thing.” “They moved someone out of his cell. They put two people, one of whom was not even a full-time, prison guard on duty. None of the cameras trained on the cell work. They were all out of it that night.”
2:04

During a previous appearance on the Full Send Podcast, Tucker Carlson asserted with absolute certainty that Epstein was murdered. Tucker said a friend of his was one of the last people to talk to Epstein before he was killed. The friend told Tucker that Epstein truly believed he was getting out of prison. “A friend of mine, one of the people who last talked to him on the phone the day he was killed, and he had an expectation of a bail hearing in two days.” “He thought he was getting out. He was not despondent at all. I talked to his lawyer, told me the same thing.” “They moved someone out of his cell. They put two people, one of whom was not even a full-time, prison guard on duty. None of the cameras trained on the cell work. They were all out of it that night.”

Collin Rugg

780,790 views • 2 years ago