Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

While responding to Joe Rogan, Sam Seder brilliantly explains how a having a marginal 90% income tax rate on top earners is actually GOOD for business.

highprogressive🥂👁️

27,978 subscribers

93,099 просмотров • 3 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Образование

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 9

Фото профиля highprogressive🥂🇦🇶

highprogressive🥂🇦🇶3 лет назад

POV: Sam Seder just called you a Ding Dong

Фото профиля keegert 🕺🏼

keegert 🕺🏼3 лет назад

@majorityfm People like Joe don’t even understand what marginal tax brackets are. They just see “90%” and start screeching.

Фото профиля mario 🔆🐋 🇵🇸

mario 🔆🐋 🇵🇸3 лет назад

So anyways, have you tried DMT?

Фото профиля Newscast Now

Newscast Now3 лет назад

We can see higher marginal tax rates promote economic growth in history: 1950s growth 5.5%, tax ~90%. 1960s (5.0) and 1970s (3.7) lower growth after marginal tax cuts. 1980's growth 3.4, after more tax cuts. 1990's growth 3.7, taxes went up. 2000's growth 1.9 rates went way down.

Фото профиля SuburbEnjoyer

SuburbEnjoyer3 лет назад

Proposes a massive marginal income tax on the rich. Proceeds to explain how the rich can easily avoid paying it by "putting it into a business". Yeah. Like how Trump's personal mansion, Mar-a-lago, is part of a business.

Фото профиля Ayn Rand Paul Harvey Weinstein

Ayn Rand Paul Harvey Weinstein3 лет назад

Aw, man, that segment kicked so much ass. Joe Rogaine is gonna looove it

Фото профиля Toedipper

Toedipper3 лет назад

Unfortunately @joerogan will never see this response because he’s walled himself off from hearing responses by never looking at Twitter.

Фото профиля Tyler Grutbo

Tyler Grutbo3 лет назад

I love Sam.

Фото профиля Ferrari Cakes

Ferrari Cakes3 лет назад

Why would anyone move here to start a business instead of someplace else with lower taxes? What’s the incentive?

Похожие видео

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Bernie Sanders are rallying to attempt to raise the top tax rate on businesses and individuals before their budget deadline April 1st Top earners will be expected to pay 52% of their income in taxes For individuals: Income > $5B = 10.8% tax rate Income > $25M = 11.4% tax rate City, State, Federal = 52% Corporate tax rate Income > $5M = 10.8% tax rate Income > $25M = 11.4% tax rate City, State, Federal = 52% tax rate

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Bernie Sanders are rallying to attempt to raise the top tax rate on businesses and individuals before their budget deadline April 1st Top earners will be expected to pay 52% of their income in taxes For individuals: Income > $5B = 10.8% tax rate Income > $25M = 11.4% tax rate City, State, Federal = 52% Corporate tax rate Income > $5M = 10.8% tax rate Income > $25M = 11.4% tax rate City, State, Federal = 52% tax rate

Wall Street Apes

62,604 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

India is attempting a financial transformation by turning millions of low-income earners into stock market investors — all for just $3 a month. Ashutoshasj explains how

India is attempting a financial transformation by turning millions of low-income earners into stock market investors — all for just $3 a month. Ashutoshasj explains how

Bloomberg

19,434 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🔥 WATCH: Sam Seder schools Joe Rogan on why progressive taxation/taxing the top a higher rate (as we did after the depression) is good EVERY CHART shows Republicans have spent 75 years lowering taxes on the rich to hoard wealth at the expense of the working class. Majority Report

🔥 WATCH: Sam Seder schools Joe Rogan on why progressive taxation/taxing the top a higher rate (as we did after the depression) is good EVERY CHART shows Republicans have spent 75 years lowering taxes on the rich to hoard wealth at the expense of the working class. Majority Report

The Tennessee Holler

182,507 просмотров • 1 год назад

The 5% wealth tax is really a 10% tax on billionaires. And Gavin Newsom revealed his hand of wanting to target the top 10% earners if he becomes President. Top 10% Individual income: $155,000 Top 10% household income: $255,000 Numbers 👇🏽

The 5% wealth tax is really a 10% tax on billionaires. And Gavin Newsom revealed his hand of wanting to target the top 10% earners if he becomes President. Top 10% Individual income: $155,000 Top 10% household income: $255,000 Numbers 👇🏽

Patrick Bet-David

118,003 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Democrats independence a bill to abolish the income tax on lower income Americans, but increase the income tax on high earners “Under the bill, any income up to $46,000 for individuals, or $92,000 for couples would not be subject to enter any federal income taxes” “Now, to fund it taxpayers making more than a million dollars a year would get a progressive tax hike - Those making between $1 and 2 million would pay an extra 5% for a total top rate of 42% (current federal) - Those making more than $5 million a year would have a top federal rate of 59% So what does that mean? Well, someone here in New York City making more than $5 million a year, their combined state, city, and federal rate would be over 73%. For New Jersey taxpayers making more than million a year, the combined state and federal rate would be over 69%”

Democrats independence a bill to abolish the income tax on lower income Americans, but increase the income tax on high earners “Under the bill, any income up to $46,000 for individuals, or $92,000 for couples would not be subject to enter any federal income taxes” “Now, to fund it taxpayers making more than a million dollars a year would get a progressive tax hike - Those making between $1 and 2 million would pay an extra 5% for a total top rate of 42% (current federal) - Those making more than $5 million a year would have a top federal rate of 59% So what does that mean? Well, someone here in New York City making more than $5 million a year, their combined state, city, and federal rate would be over 73%. For New Jersey taxpayers making more than million a year, the combined state and federal rate would be over 69%”

Wall Street Apes

96,079 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

You can set your watch to it. New York City’s new Mayor, Zohran Mamdani, just announced the city is in a massive $12 BILLION financial hole. To fill the hole, he is pushing to raise income taxes on top earners and hike the corporate tax rate to 11.5% making NYC the highest-tax jurisdiction for earners in the entire country. He claims he talked to a millionaire who said they "wouldn't leave" over a tax hike. But economists (and common sense) warn that businesses and wealth are already packing their bags. He ran on "affordability," but it looks like the first order of business is making the city more expensive for the people who pay the bills.

You can set your watch to it. New York City’s new Mayor, Zohran Mamdani, just announced the city is in a massive $12 BILLION financial hole. To fill the hole, he is pushing to raise income taxes on top earners and hike the corporate tax rate to 11.5% making NYC the highest-tax jurisdiction for earners in the entire country. He claims he talked to a millionaire who said they "wouldn't leave" over a tax hike. But economists (and common sense) warn that businesses and wealth are already packing their bags. He ran on "affordability," but it looks like the first order of business is making the city more expensive for the people who pay the bills.

Desiree

171,385 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Our millionaire prime minister pays the same tax rate as a teacher. The climate crisis is driven by the emissions of the wealthiest, not low and middle-income earners. For a scaled-up, just transition, the wealthy need to step up and pay more. Time for a wealth tax.

Our millionaire prime minister pays the same tax rate as a teacher. The climate crisis is driven by the emissions of the wealthiest, not low and middle-income earners. For a scaled-up, just transition, the wealthy need to step up and pay more. Time for a wealth tax.

Clive Lewis MP

134,905 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Don’t believe Albanese when he says he is giving low income earners a tax cut. He didn’t renew the Coalitions Low and Middle Income Tax offset rebate worth up to $1,500 a year in Labor’s first budget and now he’s returning only half of it to low income earners. None of these tax cuts make up for the average increase in household expenditure of $8,800 due to Labor’s inflation and immigration. #auspol

Don’t believe Albanese when he says he is giving low income earners a tax cut. He didn’t renew the Coalitions Low and Middle Income Tax offset rebate worth up to $1,500 a year in Labor’s first budget and now he’s returning only half of it to low income earners. None of these tax cuts make up for the average increase in household expenditure of $8,800 due to Labor’s inflation and immigration. #auspol

Gerard Rennick

51,936 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Fake News Peddler The DeshBhakt 🇮🇳! Akash Banerjee says if your income is 12.75 lakh then zero tax. But if your income is 12.76 lakh, then you'll pay tax almost similar to current rate. Looks like Idiot has not heard "Marginal Relief". *If your income is 12.76 lakh* Old Tax Liability- Rs 83,408 New Tax- Rs 1,040 Savings- Rs 82,368 If you don't know how to calculate tax, then why spread lie and make yourself look like a Fool?

Fake News Peddler The DeshBhakt 🇮🇳! Akash Banerjee says if your income is 12.75 lakh then zero tax. But if your income is 12.76 lakh, then you'll pay tax almost similar to current rate. Looks like Idiot has not heard "Marginal Relief". If your income is 12.76 lakh Old Tax Liability- Rs 83,408 New Tax- Rs 1,040 Savings- Rs 82,368 If you don't know how to calculate tax, then why spread lie and make yourself look like a Fool?

Ankur Singh

1,068,551 просмотров • 1 год назад

BREAKING: JD Vance explains to Joe Rogan how President Reagan made California a permanently blue state.

BREAKING: JD Vance explains to Joe Rogan how President Reagan made California a permanently blue state.

Leading Report

3,505,953 просмотров • 1 год назад

Left: Rishy Sunak, "For me, it is a fundamental duty of government to make sure that hard work is always rewarded" Right: Martin Lewis explains how by freezing income tax thresholds, because of inflation, we are actually being taxed more

Left: Rishy Sunak, "For me, it is a fundamental duty of government to make sure that hard work is always rewarded" Right: Martin Lewis explains how by freezing income tax thresholds, because of inflation, we are actually being taxed more

Farrukh

329,898 просмотров • 2 лет назад

“It’s great that the Treasurer is reading my research — but he completely misrepresented it.” The IPA’s research argued for a simpler and fairer tax system with lower income taxes, not a minimum 30% capital gains tax rate, higher marginal tax rates, and policies that punish innovation and investment. 📺 Adam Creighton sets the record straight on Sharri:

“It’s great that the Treasurer is reading my research — but he completely misrepresented it.” The IPA’s research argued for a simpler and fairer tax system with lower income taxes, not a minimum 30% capital gains tax rate, higher marginal tax rates, and policies that punish innovation and investment. 📺 Adam Creighton sets the record straight on Sharri:

Institute of Public Affairs

14,230 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

“I would prefer raise the rate of income tax… freezing the threshold means the lowest earners get drawn into tax.” Labour made a “silly promise” forcing themselves to push the tax burden onto the poorest, says former conservative chancellor Ken Clarke MP. @KaitBorsay

“I would prefer raise the rate of income tax… freezing the threshold means the lowest earners get drawn into tax.” Labour made a “silly promise” forcing themselves to push the tax burden onto the poorest, says former conservative chancellor Ken Clarke MP. @KaitBorsay

Times Radio

38,881 просмотров • 1 год назад

The budget failed to deliver significant income tax cuts to offset bracket creep that is devasting family budgets as a result of high inflation. For someone on a wage of $80,000, 4% inflation reduces purchasing power by $3,200 each year. The best Chalmers can do to help hard working Australians, is to offer a measly $275 temporary tax offset. The minimum CGT tax rate of 30% is wrong. Capital gains like any income should be taxed at the marginal rate. Low income earners are going to be hit hard by this measure. I could live with removing the CGT discount provided the extra tax revenue from that measure had been used to offset income tax rather than remove negative gearing. Negative gearing is more effective when income tax rates are high. If tax rates were lowered, then negative gearing would be become a more much ineffective tax strategy. Personally I’ve never been a fan of negative gearing, because you have to spend a $1 to get 47 cents back which leaves you 53 cents worse off in today’s money. There is no substitute for cutting income tax if you want to maintain a strong economy. Immigration is forecast to be 2 million over the next two terms of Parliament which is still too high. Yet again if Labor wants to improve housing affordability, why won’t they lower immigration? Debt levels are forecast to continue to increase which reflects on Labor’s inability to control government spending. People First will cut spending, cut immigration and cut taxes. See how at:

The budget failed to deliver significant income tax cuts to offset bracket creep that is devasting family budgets as a result of high inflation. For someone on a wage of $80,000, 4% inflation reduces purchasing power by $3,200 each year. The best Chalmers can do to help hard working Australians, is to offer a measly $275 temporary tax offset. The minimum CGT tax rate of 30% is wrong. Capital gains like any income should be taxed at the marginal rate. Low income earners are going to be hit hard by this measure. I could live with removing the CGT discount provided the extra tax revenue from that measure had been used to offset income tax rather than remove negative gearing. Negative gearing is more effective when income tax rates are high. If tax rates were lowered, then negative gearing would be become a more much ineffective tax strategy. Personally I’ve never been a fan of negative gearing, because you have to spend a $1 to get 47 cents back which leaves you 53 cents worse off in today’s money. There is no substitute for cutting income tax if you want to maintain a strong economy. Immigration is forecast to be 2 million over the next two terms of Parliament which is still too high. Yet again if Labor wants to improve housing affordability, why won’t they lower immigration? Debt levels are forecast to continue to increase which reflects on Labor’s inability to control government spending. People First will cut spending, cut immigration and cut taxes. See how at:

Gerard Rennick

32,887 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад