Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

While talking about the six-member high-powered task force committee anounced by PM Modi to bring exam reforms, Priyanka Gandhi referred to IIT Madras Director Prof. V. Kamakoti as a "Gaumutra expert" and said what do they know about education?? The six members are: - Nandan Nilekani: Infosys co-founder and...

Incognito_qfs's profile picture

Incognito

141,674 subscribers

10,511 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Does Priyanka Vadra hate anyone who follows Hinduism?😡 Priyanka referred to IIT Madras Director Prof. V. Kamakoti as a “Gaumutra expert.” Aukat hai teri to even take his name from ur mouth? Know Prof Kamakoti- -One of Bharat's most accomplished computer scientists & academicians. -Holds M.S. & Ph.D. degrees in Computer Science and Engineering from IIT Madras. -Became Director of Madras IIT in January 2022. -Expert in Computer Architecture, Information Security & VLSI Design. -Heads Microprocessor Development Programme and the Information Security Education and Awareness Programme at IIT Madras. -Serves as a member of the National Security Advisory Board. -Former Chairman of the Artificial Intelligence Task Force constituted by Ministry of Commerce and Industry. -Has served IIT Madras as Chairman, JEE, and Associate Dean (Industrial Consultancy & Sponsored Research). -Author of more than 150 research papers in international journals & conferences and has supervised numerous Ph.D. and Master’s scholars. -Serves on the technology committees of the National Stock Exchange and the Reserve Bank of India. -Recipient of several prestigious honours: DRDO Academic Excellence Award, Indian Electronics and Semiconductor Association Techno Visionary Award, Abdul Kalam Technology Innovation National Fellowship, ACCS Lifetime Achievement Award, IBM Faculty Award, and the VASVIK Industrial Research Award. Priyanka Vadra who has a Dynast History of giving Bharat Ratna to themselves with own hands, has the audacity of calling this man "Gaumutra Expert". Now tell us about ur academic achievements, Mrs Vadra? Tumhare pure khandan ki degrees add karo toh bhi can't reach even to 5% of this man's achievements.
1:59

Does Priyanka Vadra hate anyone who follows Hinduism?😡 Priyanka referred to IIT Madras Director Prof. V. Kamakoti as a “Gaumutra expert.” Aukat hai teri to even take his name from ur mouth? Know Prof Kamakoti- -One of Bharat's most accomplished computer scientists & academicians. -Holds M.S. & Ph.D. degrees in Computer Science and Engineering from IIT Madras. -Became Director of Madras IIT in January 2022. -Expert in Computer Architecture, Information Security & VLSI Design. -Heads Microprocessor Development Programme and the Information Security Education and Awareness Programme at IIT Madras. -Serves as a member of the National Security Advisory Board. -Former Chairman of the Artificial Intelligence Task Force constituted by Ministry of Commerce and Industry. -Has served IIT Madras as Chairman, JEE, and Associate Dean (Industrial Consultancy & Sponsored Research). -Author of more than 150 research papers in international journals & conferences and has supervised numerous Ph.D. and Master’s scholars. -Serves on the technology committees of the National Stock Exchange and the Reserve Bank of India. -Recipient of several prestigious honours: DRDO Academic Excellence Award, Indian Electronics and Semiconductor Association Techno Visionary Award, Abdul Kalam Technology Innovation National Fellowship, ACCS Lifetime Achievement Award, IBM Faculty Award, and the VASVIK Industrial Research Award. Priyanka Vadra who has a Dynast History of giving Bharat Ratna to themselves with own hands, has the audacity of calling this man "Gaumutra Expert". Now tell us about ur academic achievements, Mrs Vadra? Tumhare pure khandan ki degrees add karo toh bhi can't reach even to 5% of this man's achievements.

BhikuMhatre

12,447 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

PRIYANKA GANDHI VADRA LABELS PROFESSOR KAMAKOTI A "GAU MUTRA" EXPERT. WE SAY GIVE US A GAU MUTRA EXPERT OVER A DYNAST ANY DAY! Here's why: Professor Kamakoti: + Director of IIT Madras since 2022 developed Shakti India's first industry grade microprocessor. + Helped the nation's cause by creating a collective portfolio of startups worth billions of dollars that provide 11000 direct jobs. + IIT Madras Incubation Cell (IITMIC) is valued at over Rs. 74,100 Crore (approximately US$ 8 billion) based on their latest funding and market valuation rounds. + Prof. V. Kamakoti received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Computer Science and Engineering from IIT Madras. VERSUS Priyanka Gandhi Vadra: + Dynast, owes her seat in Parliament to her family surname. + Has earned for herself Assets: Rs 77,54,77,352 ~77 Crore+ + Is the holder of a Post Graduate Diploma in Buddhist Studies from University of Sunderland UK in 2010, BA Hons - Psychology from Jesus and Mary College, University of Delhi in 1993
0:31

PRIYANKA GANDHI VADRA LABELS PROFESSOR KAMAKOTI A "GAU MUTRA" EXPERT. WE SAY GIVE US A GAU MUTRA EXPERT OVER A DYNAST ANY DAY! Here's why: Professor Kamakoti: + Director of IIT Madras since 2022 developed Shakti India's first industry grade microprocessor. + Helped the nation's cause by creating a collective portfolio of startups worth billions of dollars that provide 11000 direct jobs. + IIT Madras Incubation Cell (IITMIC) is valued at over Rs. 74,100 Crore (approximately US$ 8 billion) based on their latest funding and market valuation rounds. + Prof. V. Kamakoti received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Computer Science and Engineering from IIT Madras. VERSUS Priyanka Gandhi Vadra: + Dynast, owes her seat in Parliament to her family surname. + Has earned for herself Assets: Rs 77,54,77,352 ~77 Crore+ + Is the holder of a Post Graduate Diploma in Buddhist Studies from University of Sunderland UK in 2010, BA Hons - Psychology from Jesus and Mary College, University of Delhi in 1993

Rahul Shivshankar

220,920 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

#WATCH | Bhubaneswar, Odisha | On open letter to Priyanka Gandhi about her statement on IIT Madras Director Professor V Kamakoti, Utkal University Former Vice Chancellor Prof Sabita Acharya says, "He is academically very sound... and worked on over 50 research projects. It is very unfortunate that Priyanka Gandhi Vadra remarks that he is a Gomutra expert. This is very insulting to all the senior academicians, for the research necessary for the development... No remarks and statements should be made against academicians in lieu of political conflicts..."
1:15

#WATCH | Bhubaneswar, Odisha | On open letter to Priyanka Gandhi about her statement on IIT Madras Director Professor V Kamakoti, Utkal University Former Vice Chancellor Prof Sabita Acharya says, "He is academically very sound... and worked on over 50 research projects. It is very unfortunate that Priyanka Gandhi Vadra remarks that he is a Gomutra expert. This is very insulting to all the senior academicians, for the research necessary for the development... No remarks and statements should be made against academicians in lieu of political conflicts..."

ANI

20,930 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

Priyanka Vadra’s “Gau Mutra expert” jibe at IIT Madras Director V. Kamakoti is not just crude politics. It is the same language of contempt used by the Pulwama suicide bomber. In his pre-attack propaganda video, Jaish-e-Mohammed terrorist Adil Ahmad Dar (Waqas Commando) repeatedly referred to Hindus as “गाय का पेशाब पीने वाले” (“cow urine drinkers”) while justifying the murder of 40 CRPF jawans. That phrase was not random abuse. It was deliberate Islamist hate speech meant to dehumanise an entire community and glorify violence against it. Seven years later, a sitting Congress Member of Parliament stands in the Lok Sabha and reduces one of India’s finest computer scientists, the man behind the indigenous SHAKTI processor, the Director of IIT Madras, and the former head of the Prime Minister’s AI Task Force, to a “Gau Mutra expert” because he once spoke about traditional knowledge systems and indigenous cattle. Same slur. Same contempt for Hindu cultural practices. One used it to justify a suicide bombing. The other uses it to score political points in Parliament. When the language of a Jaish terrorist and the language of a Gandhi family politician starts sounding alike, it is not a coincidence. It is a revealing continuum of disdain.
0:21

Priyanka Vadra’s “Gau Mutra expert” jibe at IIT Madras Director V. Kamakoti is not just crude politics. It is the same language of contempt used by the Pulwama suicide bomber. In his pre-attack propaganda video, Jaish-e-Mohammed terrorist Adil Ahmad Dar (Waqas Commando) repeatedly referred to Hindus as “गाय का पेशाब पीने वाले” (“cow urine drinkers”) while justifying the murder of 40 CRPF jawans. That phrase was not random abuse. It was deliberate Islamist hate speech meant to dehumanise an entire community and glorify violence against it. Seven years later, a sitting Congress Member of Parliament stands in the Lok Sabha and reduces one of India’s finest computer scientists, the man behind the indigenous SHAKTI processor, the Director of IIT Madras, and the former head of the Prime Minister’s AI Task Force, to a “Gau Mutra expert” because he once spoke about traditional knowledge systems and indigenous cattle. Same slur. Same contempt for Hindu cultural practices. One used it to justify a suicide bombing. The other uses it to score political points in Parliament. When the language of a Jaish terrorist and the language of a Gandhi family politician starts sounding alike, it is not a coincidence. It is a revealing continuum of disdain.

Amit Malviya

51,740 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

#WATCH | Delhi | Director General of École Polytechnique (French engineering school), Laura Chaubard says, "École Polytechnique is a world-class institution for research and higher education in science in France and we have led ten very active policies to get more international partnerships. We have developed a wide range of education programs taught in English... We are very happy and excited to develop new partnerships with the Indian partners, especially with IITs and IISCs and we came here this week to sign two agreements for student exchange with IIT Mumbai and IIT Delhi. Currently, there are about 80 Indian students in our programs..." On the question, whether École Polytechnique will establish a centre in India, she says, "Not right now, we are exploring future ways of collaboration. We agreed with Bangalore to set up a faculty seminar to get our faculty members to know each other and then explore what we can do as joint supervision of PhDs and maybe double degrees in the future..."
7:01

#WATCH | Delhi | Director General of École Polytechnique (French engineering school), Laura Chaubard says, "École Polytechnique is a world-class institution for research and higher education in science in France and we have led ten very active policies to get more international partnerships. We have developed a wide range of education programs taught in English... We are very happy and excited to develop new partnerships with the Indian partners, especially with IITs and IISCs and we came here this week to sign two agreements for student exchange with IIT Mumbai and IIT Delhi. Currently, there are about 80 Indian students in our programs..." On the question, whether École Polytechnique will establish a centre in India, she says, "Not right now, we are exploring future ways of collaboration. We agreed with Bangalore to set up a faculty seminar to get our faculty members to know each other and then explore what we can do as joint supervision of PhDs and maybe double degrees in the future..."

ANI

10,270 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I was happy to receive the "Outstanding Higher Education Stalwart of the Year" award for 2024 from The Economic Times (Economic Times) last night in Delhi. Of course, there is still so much to do. I returned from the US in 1998 to join IIT Bombay (IIT Bombay) as a faculty member. After 25 years in the IIT system (18 years as a faculty member in IIT Bombay and 7 years in IIT Delhi, of which 6 years as the Director of IIT Delhi), I am now with the BITS Pilanii as a group Vice Chancellor since March 2023. All these three institutions happen to be the Institutions of Eminence (IoE) as recognized by the Ministry of Education Ministry of Education, Govt of India. #IIT Delhi received the #IoE status during my time as the Director IIT Delhi following a highly competitive process. Higher education needs major structural #reforms in India. We are archaic when it comes to managing our best institutions. While Public institutions are dependent on Govt of India for 90% of their funding, Private institutions are dependent on tuition fee for 90% of their sustenance. Both are flawed #financial #models. We need to develop a #diversified financial model where endowments, overheads on research and tuition fee contribute an equal share. It requires major #policy tweaks. We need to seriously look at Study Now-Pay Later kind of models on the lines of Australia's HELP scheme. American higher education funding models burden the students with #debt. So much needs to be done in this space in India. Without a proper financial model in place, our institutions are totally at the mercy of bureaucrats and politicians. State #universities are already on their knees and it won't be long before the same happens with our centrally funded Institutions. Industry is the bridge between #research (generation of knowledge) and #innovation (utilization of knowledge for public good). With India ranked 66th among the 130 countries when it comes to academia-industry collaborations, it's clear what we need to do to promote innovation. It's again the Government which needs to make favorable policies for promoting #academia-#industry collaborations. Hope to see some of these #reforms taken up by the new government.
0:20

I was happy to receive the "Outstanding Higher Education Stalwart of the Year" award for 2024 from The Economic Times (Economic Times) last night in Delhi. Of course, there is still so much to do. I returned from the US in 1998 to join IIT Bombay (IIT Bombay) as a faculty member. After 25 years in the IIT system (18 years as a faculty member in IIT Bombay and 7 years in IIT Delhi, of which 6 years as the Director of IIT Delhi), I am now with the BITS Pilanii as a group Vice Chancellor since March 2023. All these three institutions happen to be the Institutions of Eminence (IoE) as recognized by the Ministry of Education Ministry of Education, Govt of India. #IIT Delhi received the #IoE status during my time as the Director IIT Delhi following a highly competitive process. Higher education needs major structural #reforms in India. We are archaic when it comes to managing our best institutions. While Public institutions are dependent on Govt of India for 90% of their funding, Private institutions are dependent on tuition fee for 90% of their sustenance. Both are flawed #financial #models. We need to develop a #diversified financial model where endowments, overheads on research and tuition fee contribute an equal share. It requires major #policy tweaks. We need to seriously look at Study Now-Pay Later kind of models on the lines of Australia's HELP scheme. American higher education funding models burden the students with #debt. So much needs to be done in this space in India. Without a proper financial model in place, our institutions are totally at the mercy of bureaucrats and politicians. State #universities are already on their knees and it won't be long before the same happens with our centrally funded Institutions. Industry is the bridge between #research (generation of knowledge) and #innovation (utilization of knowledge for public good). With India ranked 66th among the 130 countries when it comes to academia-industry collaborations, it's clear what we need to do to promote innovation. It's again the Government which needs to make favorable policies for promoting #academia-#industry collaborations. Hope to see some of these #reforms taken up by the new government.

V. Ramgopal Rao, Ph.D.

11,825 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

VIDEO | BJP leader Sambit Patra (Sambit Patra) alleges taking away of former PM JL Nehru's letters from PM Memorial Museum in 2008 by Congress leader Sonia Gandhi by saying, "As far as PM Memorial Museum is concerned, which used to be called JL Nehru Memorial Museum, we came to know today in AGM that in 2008, Sonia Gandhi took away 51 cartons of letters written by JL Nehru from there. The letters included letters to Edwina Mountbatten, JP Narayan. Rizwan Qadri, who is a historian, has written clearly to Rahul Gandhi that his mother had taken away the letters which were a public property and they should return. I don't know what was the communication about as they are trying to conceal them." #PMMemorialMuseum #soniagandhi
1:28

VIDEO | BJP leader Sambit Patra (Sambit Patra) alleges taking away of former PM JL Nehru's letters from PM Memorial Museum in 2008 by Congress leader Sonia Gandhi by saying, "As far as PM Memorial Museum is concerned, which used to be called JL Nehru Memorial Museum, we came to know today in AGM that in 2008, Sonia Gandhi took away 51 cartons of letters written by JL Nehru from there. The letters included letters to Edwina Mountbatten, JP Narayan. Rizwan Qadri, who is a historian, has written clearly to Rahul Gandhi that his mother had taken away the letters which were a public property and they should return. I don't know what was the communication about as they are trying to conceal them." #PMMemorialMuseum #soniagandhi

Press Trust of India

24,872 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Three women who served in Trump’s administration and knew him best say a second term would be "the end of American democracy as we know it." We need to make sure “that he is not elected the president again.” Their words need to be seen by EVERY voter in America. 👇 THE INTERVIEW: ABC News "This Week" co-anchor Jonathan Karl sat down with former White House Communications Director Alyssa Farah Griffin, former White House deputy press secretary Sarah Matthews, and former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson. THEIR STORIES ARE IMPORTANT: Griffin, now a co-host of ABC's "The View," accused Trump of having gone to "historic and unconstitutional lengths" in attempting to "steal a democratic election" and to stay in power. “This is a fundamental election to continue to safeguard our institutions and our constitutional republic," Hutchinson said. "The fact that he feels that he needs to lean into being a dictator alone shows that he is a weak and feeble man who has no sense of character and integrity and has no sense of leadership," she said, a sentiment with which Griffin agreed. What are your thoughts? Do you agree with these women?
1:03

Three women who served in Trump’s administration and knew him best say a second term would be "the end of American democracy as we know it." We need to make sure “that he is not elected the president again.” Their words need to be seen by EVERY voter in America. 👇 THE INTERVIEW: ABC News "This Week" co-anchor Jonathan Karl sat down with former White House Communications Director Alyssa Farah Griffin, former White House deputy press secretary Sarah Matthews, and former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson. THEIR STORIES ARE IMPORTANT: Griffin, now a co-host of ABC's "The View," accused Trump of having gone to "historic and unconstitutional lengths" in attempting to "steal a democratic election" and to stay in power. “This is a fundamental election to continue to safeguard our institutions and our constitutional republic," Hutchinson said. "The fact that he feels that he needs to lean into being a dictator alone shows that he is a weak and feeble man who has no sense of character and integrity and has no sense of leadership," she said, a sentiment with which Griffin agreed. What are your thoughts? Do you agree with these women?

CALL TO ACTIVISM

543,836 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨🚨🚨MAJOR BREAKING: Three women that served in Trumps’e administration now say a second term would be "the end of American democracy as we know it." We need to make sure “that he is not elected the president again.” Their words need to be seen by EVERY voter in America. 👇 THE INTERVIEW: ABC News "This Week" co-anchor Jonathan Karl sat down with former White House Communications Director Alyssa Farah Griffin, former White House deputy press secretary Sarah Matthews, and former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson. THEIR STORIES ARE IMPORTANT: Griffin, now a co-host of ABC's "The View," accused Trump of having gone to "historic and unconstitutional lengths" in attempting to "steal a democratic election" and to stay in power. “This is a fundamental election to continue to safeguard our institutions and our constitutional republic," Hutchinson said. "The fact that he feels that he needs to lean into being a dictator alone shows that he is a weak and feeble man who has no sense of character and integrity and has no sense of leadership," she said, a sentiment with which Griffin agreed. What are your thoughts? Do you agree with these women?
1:03

🚨🚨🚨MAJOR BREAKING: Three women that served in Trumps’e administration now say a second term would be "the end of American democracy as we know it." We need to make sure “that he is not elected the president again.” Their words need to be seen by EVERY voter in America. 👇 THE INTERVIEW: ABC News "This Week" co-anchor Jonathan Karl sat down with former White House Communications Director Alyssa Farah Griffin, former White House deputy press secretary Sarah Matthews, and former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson. THEIR STORIES ARE IMPORTANT: Griffin, now a co-host of ABC's "The View," accused Trump of having gone to "historic and unconstitutional lengths" in attempting to "steal a democratic election" and to stay in power. “This is a fundamental election to continue to safeguard our institutions and our constitutional republic," Hutchinson said. "The fact that he feels that he needs to lean into being a dictator alone shows that he is a weak and feeble man who has no sense of character and integrity and has no sense of leadership," she said, a sentiment with which Griffin agreed. What are your thoughts? Do you agree with these women?

CALL TO ACTIVISM

6,891,960 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

#ZimProfessorReginaldAustinDies Professor Reginald Austin, a distinguished Zimbabwean legal scholar, international human rights expert, and liberation struggle supporter who served as a key legal adviser to Zapu and the Patriotic Front during Lancaster House talks in 1979, has died in the United Kingdom. Deeply involved in the liberation struggle and negotiations for Independence in 1980, Austin left an indelible footprint on the local historical and political landscape. He was close for the late former Zipra commander and intelligence supremo Dumiso Dabengwa and the Zapu leadership under Joshua Nkomo. A former Dean of Law at the University of Zimbabwe for a decade, specialising in constitutional law, international human rights protection, and the law of armed conflict, he was an integral part of the anti-Rhodesian regime movement. He was later Director and Chief Electoral Officer of the UN Observer Mission to South Africa (UNOMSA) for the 1994 transitional elections, and UN Director of Elections in Cambodia in 1993. Austin organised the successful national elections in Afghanistan in 2003, and the Solomon Islands in 2006. He was appointed by the UN Secretary-General as one of three high-level electoral experts to verify the conduct of each phase of the electoral process in East Timor for presidential and parliamentary elections in 2007. Austin has facilitated a number of key initiatives for SARDC including observation of Zambia’s first multi-party elections and the first multi-party conference on elections in Angola (both 1991), and contributed to SARDC workshops for pre-independence Namibia (1989) and post-conflict Mozambique (1992). Austin was Chief Electoral Officer of UNAMA (2002) in Afghanistan; Director of the Legal and Constitutional Division of the Commonwealth Secretariat (1993-98) and a Director at International IDEA in Stockholm (1998-2002). He was the first chairman of the Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission, among other things. Key Publications and Academic Works: 🔴The History of Zimbabwe's Constitution-Making Process 1888 to 2008: A comprehensive look at the evolution of Zimbabwe's constitutional framework. 🔴Racism and Apartheid in Southern Africa: Rhodesia; a Book of Data (1975): An early analysis for UNESCO regarding the legal and social structures of racial discrimination in pre-independence Zimbabwe (then Rhodesia). 🔴Access to Legal Education and the Legal Profession in Zimbabwe: An article examining the transformation of the legal profession post-independence and the curriculum of the Faculty of Law at the University of Zimbabwe. 🔴Democracy, Conflict and Human Security (Handbook): Published by International IDEA, Austin contributed to this work which addresses the nexus between democratic practices and human security. 🔴Land in Zimbabwe (Written Evidence): Provided expert written evidence to the Africa All-Party Parliamentary Group (AAPPG) regarding land reform and historical land issues. 🔴Namibia: The Facts (1980): While focused on Namibia, this publication reflects his broader engagement with Southern African decolonisation and legal issues.
2:41

#ZimProfessorReginaldAustinDies Professor Reginald Austin, a distinguished Zimbabwean legal scholar, international human rights expert, and liberation struggle supporter who served as a key legal adviser to Zapu and the Patriotic Front during Lancaster House talks in 1979, has died in the United Kingdom. Deeply involved in the liberation struggle and negotiations for Independence in 1980, Austin left an indelible footprint on the local historical and political landscape. He was close for the late former Zipra commander and intelligence supremo Dumiso Dabengwa and the Zapu leadership under Joshua Nkomo. A former Dean of Law at the University of Zimbabwe for a decade, specialising in constitutional law, international human rights protection, and the law of armed conflict, he was an integral part of the anti-Rhodesian regime movement. He was later Director and Chief Electoral Officer of the UN Observer Mission to South Africa (UNOMSA) for the 1994 transitional elections, and UN Director of Elections in Cambodia in 1993. Austin organised the successful national elections in Afghanistan in 2003, and the Solomon Islands in 2006. He was appointed by the UN Secretary-General as one of three high-level electoral experts to verify the conduct of each phase of the electoral process in East Timor for presidential and parliamentary elections in 2007. Austin has facilitated a number of key initiatives for SARDC including observation of Zambia’s first multi-party elections and the first multi-party conference on elections in Angola (both 1991), and contributed to SARDC workshops for pre-independence Namibia (1989) and post-conflict Mozambique (1992). Austin was Chief Electoral Officer of UNAMA (2002) in Afghanistan; Director of the Legal and Constitutional Division of the Commonwealth Secretariat (1993-98) and a Director at International IDEA in Stockholm (1998-2002). He was the first chairman of the Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission, among other things. Key Publications and Academic Works: 🔴The History of Zimbabwe's Constitution-Making Process 1888 to 2008: A comprehensive look at the evolution of Zimbabwe's constitutional framework. 🔴Racism and Apartheid in Southern Africa: Rhodesia; a Book of Data (1975): An early analysis for UNESCO regarding the legal and social structures of racial discrimination in pre-independence Zimbabwe (then Rhodesia). 🔴Access to Legal Education and the Legal Profession in Zimbabwe: An article examining the transformation of the legal profession post-independence and the curriculum of the Faculty of Law at the University of Zimbabwe. 🔴Democracy, Conflict and Human Security (Handbook): Published by International IDEA, Austin contributed to this work which addresses the nexus between democratic practices and human security. 🔴Land in Zimbabwe (Written Evidence): Provided expert written evidence to the Africa All-Party Parliamentary Group (AAPPG) regarding land reform and historical land issues. 🔴Namibia: The Facts (1980): While focused on Namibia, this publication reflects his broader engagement with Southern African decolonisation and legal issues.

TheNewsHawks

11,379 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Big Congratulations on the official launch of the China GCV CT after two months of reorganization! We now have 11 members in the China GCV CT led by Global GCV Ambassador Mr. Daniel Chen 👏👏👏 Following the Open Network on February 20th of this year, some former Chinese CT members lost their way due to misleading information, insufficient study, and complacency. To address this, I appointed Global GCV Ambassador Mr. Daniel Chen as the head of the China GCV Ambassador team. After nearly two months of hard work, the China GCV CT has demonstrated their loyalty, commitment, and efficiency. Currently, there are around 300 GCV candidates in training who will take on the roles of provincial and city GCV Ambassadors, working towards GCV education and ecosystem development. Below is the list of China GCV CT members: - **Daniel Chen**: Member of the core committee, standing committee member, chief ambassador, responsible for the overall work of the core team. - **Yu Shilong**: Member of the core committee, standing committee member, executive director, and director of ecological development. - **Hong Xuaner**: Member of the core committee, standing committee member, deputy executive director, and director of publicity and education. - **Tian Qingsheng**: Member of the core committee, standing committee member, deputy executive director, and deputy director of ecological development. - **Huo Long**: Member of the core committee and deputy director of publicity and education. - **Zheng Jianping**: Member of the core committee and chairman of the industry alliance. - **Chen Biao**: Member of the core committee and deputy director of ecological development. - **Shang Guan**: Member of the core committee and deputy director of publicity and education. - **Lei Bangfeng**: Member of the core committee and deputy director of technical education. - **Wang Haitao**: Member of the core committee and deputy director of ecological development. - **Wu Hongzhi**: Member of the core committee and vice chairman of the industry alliance. - **Wu Ge**: Chief ambassador of Sichuan Province in China and spokesperson for the core team committee. (Note: The above ranking is not in order.) I would like to congratulate Mr. Yu, Shilong on his promotion to Executive Director of China GCV CT from Deputy Executive Director due to his outstanding achievements during the buyback campaign. Additionally, I want to congratulate him on his appointment as China Ecosystem Development GCV Ambassador. Mr. Wu, Hongzhi has stepped down as Executive Director of GCV CT to focus on his role as Vice Chairman of the China Industry Alliance. Ms. Hong Xuaner has been appointed as China Education GCV Ambassador due to her extraordinary contributions to community education in China. She has a remarkable ability to understand my articles and summarize them effectively for pioneers. She has also been promoted to Deputy Executive Director for education, human resources, and promotion. Congratulations! I also want to congratulate all the China GCV Ambassadors for their tireless work and contributions. I appreciate that all of you have followed Global GCV CT strategy and implemented it effectively within the China community. We have appointed Mr. Wu Ge as the GCV CT spokesperson, and he is also the head of GCV Ambassadors in Sichuan Province. From now on, Mr. Wu Ge will broadcast all GCV community news on Kuaishou, which will expedite our GCV education and promotional strategies. Another important update: A few months ago, we launched the Pi Network GCV Industry Alliance, and they have successfully registered a company in Hainan Province, China. I proposed the Pi Network GCV Industry Alliance to facilitate the mass adoption of Pi across various industries in China. We need supply chains that will accept Pi as payment, as this will reduce the pressure on merchants to convert Pi to fiat currency. This approach will expedite the process of establishing Pi as an independent currency. In 2024, the growth rate of the high-tech manufacturing industry in China has reached 8.9%. China’s manufacturing sector accounts for 28% of the global manufacturing industry, with nearly 60% of China’s export products being high value-added mechanical and electrical products. These figures highlight China’s critical role in the global economy, as it has been the top manufacturing country for 15 consecutive years. Therefore, the Pi Network's international trade efforts will require participation from China, and the China Industry Alliance will play a vital role in facilitating business-to-business Pi payments. Mr. Jian Ping Zhen serves as the Chairman of the China Industry Alliance, while Mr. Hong Zhi Wu serves as the Vice Chairman. I thank them for their hard work and extraordinary contributions in establishing the China GCV Industry Alliance, which is now fully operational. The China Industry Alliance operates independently from the China GCV CT, as it is a registered business entity and functions under commercial laws and a real business environment. However, both the Chair and Vice Chair are members of the China GCV CT, ensuring that the company remains aligned with the mission of promoting the mass adoption of Pi at GCV. Big congratulations to China GCV community! Your unwavering unity, fierce passion, and bold vision are precisely what this GCV movement needs to thrive. You are not passively waiting for the future; you are actively crafting it in this very moment. We will achieve our ambitious goals because brave individuals like you step up boldly when challenges arise. This marks the exciting beginning of a new chapter. China GCV community, the world is watching with eager anticipation. Let’s boldly showcase the true essence of GCV and demonstrate our strength and vision. Doris Yin 🪷🪷🪷 Founder, Global GCV Movement May 2nd, 2025
1:45

Big Congratulations on the official launch of the China GCV CT after two months of reorganization! We now have 11 members in the China GCV CT led by Global GCV Ambassador Mr. Daniel Chen 👏👏👏 Following the Open Network on February 20th of this year, some former Chinese CT members lost their way due to misleading information, insufficient study, and complacency. To address this, I appointed Global GCV Ambassador Mr. Daniel Chen as the head of the China GCV Ambassador team. After nearly two months of hard work, the China GCV CT has demonstrated their loyalty, commitment, and efficiency. Currently, there are around 300 GCV candidates in training who will take on the roles of provincial and city GCV Ambassadors, working towards GCV education and ecosystem development. Below is the list of China GCV CT members: - **Daniel Chen**: Member of the core committee, standing committee member, chief ambassador, responsible for the overall work of the core team. - **Yu Shilong**: Member of the core committee, standing committee member, executive director, and director of ecological development. - **Hong Xuaner**: Member of the core committee, standing committee member, deputy executive director, and director of publicity and education. - **Tian Qingsheng**: Member of the core committee, standing committee member, deputy executive director, and deputy director of ecological development. - **Huo Long**: Member of the core committee and deputy director of publicity and education. - **Zheng Jianping**: Member of the core committee and chairman of the industry alliance. - **Chen Biao**: Member of the core committee and deputy director of ecological development. - **Shang Guan**: Member of the core committee and deputy director of publicity and education. - **Lei Bangfeng**: Member of the core committee and deputy director of technical education. - **Wang Haitao**: Member of the core committee and deputy director of ecological development. - **Wu Hongzhi**: Member of the core committee and vice chairman of the industry alliance. - **Wu Ge**: Chief ambassador of Sichuan Province in China and spokesperson for the core team committee. (Note: The above ranking is not in order.) I would like to congratulate Mr. Yu, Shilong on his promotion to Executive Director of China GCV CT from Deputy Executive Director due to his outstanding achievements during the buyback campaign. Additionally, I want to congratulate him on his appointment as China Ecosystem Development GCV Ambassador. Mr. Wu, Hongzhi has stepped down as Executive Director of GCV CT to focus on his role as Vice Chairman of the China Industry Alliance. Ms. Hong Xuaner has been appointed as China Education GCV Ambassador due to her extraordinary contributions to community education in China. She has a remarkable ability to understand my articles and summarize them effectively for pioneers. She has also been promoted to Deputy Executive Director for education, human resources, and promotion. Congratulations! I also want to congratulate all the China GCV Ambassadors for their tireless work and contributions. I appreciate that all of you have followed Global GCV CT strategy and implemented it effectively within the China community. We have appointed Mr. Wu Ge as the GCV CT spokesperson, and he is also the head of GCV Ambassadors in Sichuan Province. From now on, Mr. Wu Ge will broadcast all GCV community news on Kuaishou, which will expedite our GCV education and promotional strategies. Another important update: A few months ago, we launched the Pi Network GCV Industry Alliance, and they have successfully registered a company in Hainan Province, China. I proposed the Pi Network GCV Industry Alliance to facilitate the mass adoption of Pi across various industries in China. We need supply chains that will accept Pi as payment, as this will reduce the pressure on merchants to convert Pi to fiat currency. This approach will expedite the process of establishing Pi as an independent currency. In 2024, the growth rate of the high-tech manufacturing industry in China has reached 8.9%. China’s manufacturing sector accounts for 28% of the global manufacturing industry, with nearly 60% of China’s export products being high value-added mechanical and electrical products. These figures highlight China’s critical role in the global economy, as it has been the top manufacturing country for 15 consecutive years. Therefore, the Pi Network's international trade efforts will require participation from China, and the China Industry Alliance will play a vital role in facilitating business-to-business Pi payments. Mr. Jian Ping Zhen serves as the Chairman of the China Industry Alliance, while Mr. Hong Zhi Wu serves as the Vice Chairman. I thank them for their hard work and extraordinary contributions in establishing the China GCV Industry Alliance, which is now fully operational. The China Industry Alliance operates independently from the China GCV CT, as it is a registered business entity and functions under commercial laws and a real business environment. However, both the Chair and Vice Chair are members of the China GCV CT, ensuring that the company remains aligned with the mission of promoting the mass adoption of Pi at GCV. Big congratulations to China GCV community! Your unwavering unity, fierce passion, and bold vision are precisely what this GCV movement needs to thrive. You are not passively waiting for the future; you are actively crafting it in this very moment. We will achieve our ambitious goals because brave individuals like you step up boldly when challenges arise. This marks the exciting beginning of a new chapter. China GCV community, the world is watching with eager anticipation. Let’s boldly showcase the true essence of GCV and demonstrate our strength and vision. Doris Yin 🪷🪷🪷 Founder, Global GCV Movement May 2nd, 2025

Doris Yin 东方紫莲🪷

22,567 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"I have seen, with my own eyes, non-human craft and non-human beings." ~Jay Stratton (This is the game changer you've been hearing about for a while now. We'll see. Clapper sighting.) The Deadline article... Watch the trailer for The Age of Disclosure, the documentary directed and produced by Dan Farah that just got a prime opening weekend slot at SXSW. This comes on the heels of bi-partisan Congressional hearings on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP, aka UFOs) and proposed legislation to disclose what the Government knows. Farah got 34 senior members of the U.S. Government, military, and intelligence community to come on camera. He says they reveal an 80 year cover-up of the existence of non-human intelligent life and a secret war amongst major nations to reverse engineer technology of non-human origin. The film explores the profound impact the situation has on the future of humanity, while providing a look behind-the-scenes with those at the forefront of the bi-partisan disclosure effort. The film was granted unprecedented access and support from senior members of the U.S. Government, military, and intelligence community. Everyone interviewed in the film has direct knowledge of UAP as a result of their work for the U.S. Government. Amongst those featured in the landmark film are Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Lue Elizondo (former Department of Defense official, member of the Government’s Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, aka AATIP), Senator Mike Rounds, Jay Stratton (former DIA official, Director of the Government’s UAP Task Force), General Jim Clapper (former Director of National Intelligence), Mike Gold (NASA UAP Study Team member), Admiral Tim Gallaudet (Former Navy Chief Oceanographer), Brett Feddersen (former Director of Aviation Security on the White House’s National Security Council), Jim Semivan (former senior CIA official), Representative Carson, Mike Gallagher (former Chairman of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party), Christopher Mellon (former Department of Defense official), senior scientist from multiple Government UAP programs such as Dr. Garry Nolan, quantum physicist Hal Puthoff Ph.D., astrophysicist Eric Davis Ph.D., military eye-witnesses of UAP events over U.S. military bases, and more. Last year, the U.S. Senate introduced the bipartisan UAP Disclosure Act, sponsored by then Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Sen. Rounds, Sen. Rubio, and Sen. Gillibrand. The act proposed laws that would bring about public disclosure on what the Government knows about UAP and non-human intelligence. Despite being passed in the Senate, the act was ultimately blocked by special interest groups and concerns over public disclosure of the truth regarding UAP. At the time, Senator Chuck Schumer declared, “The American public has a right to learn about technologies of unknown origins, non-human intelligence and unexplainable phenomena”. Commercial distribution plans are still in the works. Cinetic Media is repping the film. The Age of Disclosure is a Farah Films production, in association with Born Ready Films. Produced and directed by Farah, Executive Producers are Colin Frederick, Andrew Farah, and Shara Senderoff. Farah’s producer credits include Ready Player One, which also premiered opening weekend of the 2018 SXSW.
2:44

"I have seen, with my own eyes, non-human craft and non-human beings." ~Jay Stratton (This is the game changer you've been hearing about for a while now. We'll see. Clapper sighting.) The Deadline article... Watch the trailer for The Age of Disclosure, the documentary directed and produced by Dan Farah that just got a prime opening weekend slot at SXSW. This comes on the heels of bi-partisan Congressional hearings on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP, aka UFOs) and proposed legislation to disclose what the Government knows. Farah got 34 senior members of the U.S. Government, military, and intelligence community to come on camera. He says they reveal an 80 year cover-up of the existence of non-human intelligent life and a secret war amongst major nations to reverse engineer technology of non-human origin. The film explores the profound impact the situation has on the future of humanity, while providing a look behind-the-scenes with those at the forefront of the bi-partisan disclosure effort. The film was granted unprecedented access and support from senior members of the U.S. Government, military, and intelligence community. Everyone interviewed in the film has direct knowledge of UAP as a result of their work for the U.S. Government. Amongst those featured in the landmark film are Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Lue Elizondo (former Department of Defense official, member of the Government’s Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program, aka AATIP), Senator Mike Rounds, Jay Stratton (former DIA official, Director of the Government’s UAP Task Force), General Jim Clapper (former Director of National Intelligence), Mike Gold (NASA UAP Study Team member), Admiral Tim Gallaudet (Former Navy Chief Oceanographer), Brett Feddersen (former Director of Aviation Security on the White House’s National Security Council), Jim Semivan (former senior CIA official), Representative Carson, Mike Gallagher (former Chairman of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party), Christopher Mellon (former Department of Defense official), senior scientist from multiple Government UAP programs such as Dr. Garry Nolan, quantum physicist Hal Puthoff Ph.D., astrophysicist Eric Davis Ph.D., military eye-witnesses of UAP events over U.S. military bases, and more. Last year, the U.S. Senate introduced the bipartisan UAP Disclosure Act, sponsored by then Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Sen. Rounds, Sen. Rubio, and Sen. Gillibrand. The act proposed laws that would bring about public disclosure on what the Government knows about UAP and non-human intelligence. Despite being passed in the Senate, the act was ultimately blocked by special interest groups and concerns over public disclosure of the truth regarding UAP. At the time, Senator Chuck Schumer declared, “The American public has a right to learn about technologies of unknown origins, non-human intelligence and unexplainable phenomena”. Commercial distribution plans are still in the works. Cinetic Media is repping the film. The Age of Disclosure is a Farah Films production, in association with Born Ready Films. Produced and directed by Farah, Executive Producers are Colin Frederick, Andrew Farah, and Shara Senderoff. Farah’s producer credits include Ready Player One, which also premiered opening weekend of the 2018 SXSW.

Joe Murgia

116,933 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon Musk just read the scoreboard on American education. The numbers are not disappointing. They are damning. Musk: “Our educational results have gone downhill ever since it was created.” The Department of Education was established in 1979. Before it existed, America was landing human beings on the moon. After it was created, literacy cratered, math scores collapsed, and the country dropped on every international ranking that matters. Half a century of decline under a single institution’s watch. Musk: “If you create a department and the result of creating that department is a massive decline in educational results, you’re better off not having it.” This is not a policy disagreement. This is a fifty-year performance review with one outcome. Termination. The institution designed to educate your children spent that entire stretch making them measurably worse at everything. The system was never built to produce genius. It was built to produce compliance. Standardized tests. Standardized curricula. Standardized humans. A factory that punishes the child who questions the answer and rewards the one who memorizes it. They convinced an entire country that without a federal committee, children would fall behind. The committee is the reason they did. Now something is arriving that makes the entire debate obsolete. Artificial intelligence is not a tool for the classroom. It is the classroom. An infinite tutor that adapts to a child’s exact speed, exact curiosity, exact potential. It does not burn out by third period. It does not teach to a test written by a bureaucrat who hasn’t touched a classroom in twenty years. The establishment will tell you AI in education is dangerous. That it needs oversight. Regulation. A committee. They are not protecting your children. They are protecting their authority over what your children are allowed to learn. AI does not make the Department of Education more efficient. It makes the Department of Education extinct. The curriculum is leaving the hands of the state and landing directly in the hands of the individual. Every child on earth is about to carry a teacher with infinite patience and zero agenda in their pocket. Available to anyone with a signal. The era of the standardized human is ending. We are about to find out what a mind becomes when nothing stands between it and everything it was meant to know.
0:27

Elon Musk just read the scoreboard on American education. The numbers are not disappointing. They are damning. Musk: “Our educational results have gone downhill ever since it was created.” The Department of Education was established in 1979. Before it existed, America was landing human beings on the moon. After it was created, literacy cratered, math scores collapsed, and the country dropped on every international ranking that matters. Half a century of decline under a single institution’s watch. Musk: “If you create a department and the result of creating that department is a massive decline in educational results, you’re better off not having it.” This is not a policy disagreement. This is a fifty-year performance review with one outcome. Termination. The institution designed to educate your children spent that entire stretch making them measurably worse at everything. The system was never built to produce genius. It was built to produce compliance. Standardized tests. Standardized curricula. Standardized humans. A factory that punishes the child who questions the answer and rewards the one who memorizes it. They convinced an entire country that without a federal committee, children would fall behind. The committee is the reason they did. Now something is arriving that makes the entire debate obsolete. Artificial intelligence is not a tool for the classroom. It is the classroom. An infinite tutor that adapts to a child’s exact speed, exact curiosity, exact potential. It does not burn out by third period. It does not teach to a test written by a bureaucrat who hasn’t touched a classroom in twenty years. The establishment will tell you AI in education is dangerous. That it needs oversight. Regulation. A committee. They are not protecting your children. They are protecting their authority over what your children are allowed to learn. AI does not make the Department of Education more efficient. It makes the Department of Education extinct. The curriculum is leaving the hands of the state and landing directly in the hands of the individual. Every child on earth is about to carry a teacher with infinite patience and zero agenda in their pocket. Available to anyone with a signal. The era of the standardized human is ending. We are about to find out what a mind becomes when nothing stands between it and everything it was meant to know.

Dustin

15,876 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Who is Erika Kirk? Gentle introduction… Erika Kirk, born Erika Frantzve. 🔻 She won the Miss Arizona USA pageant in November 2011 (on her 23rd birthday), which qualified her to represent Arizona in the 2012 Miss USA national competition. At the time, the Miss USA pageant was part of the Miss Universe Organization, which was co-owned by Donald Trump from 1996 to 2015. She competed in the Trump-owned Miss USA event but did not place in the top 15. 🔻 Erika stated stated her mother Lori Frantzve “was involved with the Government… Homeland Security and Department of Defense.” She holds a master's degree from the University of Cincinnati and serves as the chairman and founder of multiple companies, including AZ-Tech, GTEK, and E3Tek (part of the E3Tek Group), where she has worked as principal CEO 🔻 Her father Kent Frantzve m background is as Program Research Director at AZ-Tech International, Inc., a small Arizona-based firm providing earned value management consulting for U.S. defense and space programs. He was also the architect for one of President Trump’s buildings 🔻 Erika Kirk coincidentally ran into her future husband on an Israel trip “in the SNAKE of the ticket line”.. she said “nothing is by mistake. Nothing is a coincidence.” 🔻Charlie Kirk's mother was a mental health counselor and a former trader at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. 🔻 Kirk’s father, Robert, was an architect whose firm designed the Trump Tower in New York City. Just pointing out facts… that’s all.
0:46

Who is Erika Kirk? Gentle introduction… Erika Kirk, born Erika Frantzve. 🔻 She won the Miss Arizona USA pageant in November 2011 (on her 23rd birthday), which qualified her to represent Arizona in the 2012 Miss USA national competition. At the time, the Miss USA pageant was part of the Miss Universe Organization, which was co-owned by Donald Trump from 1996 to 2015. She competed in the Trump-owned Miss USA event but did not place in the top 15. 🔻 Erika stated stated her mother Lori Frantzve “was involved with the Government… Homeland Security and Department of Defense.” She holds a master's degree from the University of Cincinnati and serves as the chairman and founder of multiple companies, including AZ-Tech, GTEK, and E3Tek (part of the E3Tek Group), where she has worked as principal CEO 🔻 Her father Kent Frantzve m background is as Program Research Director at AZ-Tech International, Inc., a small Arizona-based firm providing earned value management consulting for U.S. defense and space programs. He was also the architect for one of President Trump’s buildings 🔻 Erika Kirk coincidentally ran into her future husband on an Israel trip “in the SNAKE of the ticket line”.. she said “nothing is by mistake. Nothing is a coincidence.” 🔻Charlie Kirk's mother was a mental health counselor and a former trader at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. 🔻 Kirk’s father, Robert, was an architect whose firm designed the Trump Tower in New York City. Just pointing out facts… that’s all.

MJTruthUltra

28,473 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

FBI DIR. KASH PATEL FINDS THOUSANDS OF DOCUMENTS in burn bag in secret room to be destroyed. What exactly did they find and why is it so important? FBI Dir. Kash Patel found a trove of sensitive documents related to the origins of the Trump–Russia probe buried in multiple "burn bags" in a secret room inside the bureau. The "burn bag" system is used to destroy documents designated as classified or higher. Multiple burn bags were found and filled with thousands of documents. One of the documents FBI officials found in a burn bag was the classified annex to former special counsel John Durham's final report, which includes the underlying intelligence he reviewed. The declassification of the classified annex is being done in close coordination between CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Patel, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, Attorney General Pam Bondi and acting National Security Agency Director William Hartman. FBI Director Kash Patel, in a June interview with podcast host Joe Rogan, revealed that he found a room full of documents and computer hard drives "that no one had ever seen or heard of." The declassified annex will be transmitted to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, who ultimately will release the document to the public. Sources exclusively briefed Fox News Digital on some of the contents of the classified annex — including that the U.S. intelligence community had credible foreign sources indicating that the FBI would play a role in spreading the alleged Trump–Russia collusion narrative — before the bureau ever launched its controversial Crossfire Hurricane probe. "Ultimately, the release of the classified annex will lend more credibility to the assertion that there was a coordinated plan inside the U.S. government to help the Clinton campaign stir up controversy connecting Trump to Russia," the source, who was granted anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence matters that have not yet been made public. Patel and his team discovered a previously undisclosed sensitive compartmented information facility (SCIF) in the FBI headquarters. "Just think about this," Patel told Rogan. "Me, as director of the FBI, the former 'Russiagate guy,' when I first got to the bureau, found a room that Comey and others hid from the world in the Hoover Building, full of documents and computer hard drives that no one had ever seen or heard of. Locked the key and hid access and just said, 'No one's ever gonna find this place.' Meanwhile, a criminal investigation has been opened into then-CIA Director John Brennan, after receiving a criminal referral from Ratcliffe; and a criminal investigation into Comey as well. As for Grassley’s team, he is expected to release a declassified version of the annex to Durham’s final report, which includes the underlying intelligence he reviewed. This will tie everything and Obama's thugs including Hillary Clinton to the coup against Trump. The intelligence has previously been classified. It's time for justice.
7:24

FBI DIR. KASH PATEL FINDS THOUSANDS OF DOCUMENTS in burn bag in secret room to be destroyed. What exactly did they find and why is it so important? FBI Dir. Kash Patel found a trove of sensitive documents related to the origins of the Trump–Russia probe buried in multiple "burn bags" in a secret room inside the bureau. The "burn bag" system is used to destroy documents designated as classified or higher. Multiple burn bags were found and filled with thousands of documents. One of the documents FBI officials found in a burn bag was the classified annex to former special counsel John Durham's final report, which includes the underlying intelligence he reviewed. The declassification of the classified annex is being done in close coordination between CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Patel, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, Attorney General Pam Bondi and acting National Security Agency Director William Hartman. FBI Director Kash Patel, in a June interview with podcast host Joe Rogan, revealed that he found a room full of documents and computer hard drives "that no one had ever seen or heard of." The declassified annex will be transmitted to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, who ultimately will release the document to the public. Sources exclusively briefed Fox News Digital on some of the contents of the classified annex — including that the U.S. intelligence community had credible foreign sources indicating that the FBI would play a role in spreading the alleged Trump–Russia collusion narrative — before the bureau ever launched its controversial Crossfire Hurricane probe. "Ultimately, the release of the classified annex will lend more credibility to the assertion that there was a coordinated plan inside the U.S. government to help the Clinton campaign stir up controversy connecting Trump to Russia," the source, who was granted anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence matters that have not yet been made public. Patel and his team discovered a previously undisclosed sensitive compartmented information facility (SCIF) in the FBI headquarters. "Just think about this," Patel told Rogan. "Me, as director of the FBI, the former 'Russiagate guy,' when I first got to the bureau, found a room that Comey and others hid from the world in the Hoover Building, full of documents and computer hard drives that no one had ever seen or heard of. Locked the key and hid access and just said, 'No one's ever gonna find this place.' Meanwhile, a criminal investigation has been opened into then-CIA Director John Brennan, after receiving a criminal referral from Ratcliffe; and a criminal investigation into Comey as well. As for Grassley’s team, he is expected to release a declassified version of the annex to Durham’s final report, which includes the underlying intelligence he reviewed. This will tie everything and Obama's thugs including Hillary Clinton to the coup against Trump. The intelligence has previously been classified. It's time for justice.

The SCIF

79,260 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“Totalitarian” Powers, Fear, And Psychopathy Behind CIA’s Secret Rule Over U.S. The agency remains out of control, beyond the law, and a direct threat to democracy and freedom, including in the U.S. by Michael Shellenberger Last week, we published two stories about a senior CIA whistleblower who was one of four CIA analysts who helped write a January 2017 “Intelligence Community Assessment” (ICA) that falsely claimed, with high confidence, that Russian President Vladimir Putin sought to help elect President Donald Trump in 2016. The person said that the CIA Director under Obama, John Brennan, had a “pathological need for control” and put the writers of the ICA “under duress” to include a mention of a fraudulent dossier, commissioned by the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. The CIA also included in the classified version of the ICA an annex consisting of the dossier written by a former British spy, which went to roughly 200 people in Washington, some of whom leaked related information to journalists. Unfortunately, the CIA employee said, his employer remains corrupted by “systemic rot” and that crucial steps “have not been put in place" to prevent a Russiagate-like abuse of power from happening again, since the arrival of its new director, John Ratcliffe, in January of this year. “Two critical steps that have not been put in place are,” said the senior analyst turned whistleblower, “to first, formalize expectations about the delivery timeline for sensitive intelligence analyses, and second, to remove the CIA Director from the review process of intelligence reporting or finished analysis.” In response to questions from Public, the CIA said it was taking necessary reforms. “Director Ratcliffe has overhauled the Agency senior ranks and revoked clearances from bad actors and even created a mission center to better execute on Presidential priorities like the Southern Border. The notion that he’s not making significant reforms or holding people and the Agency accountable is not just ridiculously false but beyond absurd.” But the CIA’s revoking security clearances and creating a mission center do not address either of the whistleblower’s recommendations, much less the “systemic rot” within the CIA. The whistleblower called for the removal of the Director of the CIA from review and writing of intelligence analysis, and taking a step to avoid rush jobs, like the kind Brennan used to create a deliberately misleading ICA in January 2017. The whistleblower’s credibility is high. They were one of just four CIA analysts chosen to help write a major ICA. That might make them seem biased toward Brennan, but Ratcliffe has retained the person, rather than fired them, which suggests that the Director or the direct reports he trusts view the person as valuable. Our sense was that the person was loyal to the CIA, wants to engage in objective apolitical analyses, and wants to remain at the CIA. Their two modest proposed reforms are consistent with loyalty to the CIA. As such, the person is precisely the kind of professional the CIA, Congress, and the American people should want to have in our institutions. If a legitimate criticism is to be made of the person it would be that they didn’t turn whistleblower earlier, which is the same criticism that could be made against hundreds and perhaps thousands of people involved in the Russiagate hoax. One might hope that it was just a bad day for the PR people at the CIA, and that Ratcliffe will be out with a new statement this week announcing new reforms, but we are not hopeful. The CIA appears to be following its informal motto, “Admit nothing, deny everything, and make counteraccusations.” That was the advice that former CIA Director Porter Goss said he would give to “a graduating class of CIA case officers” in 2006. The Russiagate hoax is hardly an unusual scandal in the history of the CIA. The agency has “long gone beyond the borders of American values,” noted Tim Weiner in his 812-page history, Legacy of Ashes. The CIA has murdered its employees, overthrown democracies, propped up dictatorships, tortured innocent people, trained death squads, induced mental illness in illegal medical experiments, spied illegally on law-abiding Americans, and may have been behind the assassination of an American president. All of these illegal behaviors required cover-ups, many of them elaborate. “Fundamentally, the founding fathers of U.S. intelligence were liars,” said James Angleton, one of the CIA’s founders, and its Director of Counterintelligence for two decades, on his deathbed in 1987. “If you were in a room with them, you were in a room full of people that you had to believe would deservedly end up in hell. I guess I will see them there soon.” The CIA’s record is poor when evaluated on its own terms. “The CIA was established to prevent unanticipated disasters, such as the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor,” noted John Judis in 2005, “but it has repeatedly failed to warn the White House of looming threats. It missed the North Korean invasion of the South in 1950, and the Chinese entry into the war that fall; Israel, France, and Great Britain's attack on the Suez Canal and Egypt in 1956; the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968; the Shah of Iran's ouster in 1979; the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan that year; the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1990; the Indian nuclear tests in 1998 (‘We didn't have a clue,’ CIA director George Tenet remarked afterwards); the attack on the World Trade Center in 1993; the bombing of American military barracks in Saudi Arabia in 1996 and of U.S. embassies in Africa in 1998; the attack on the USS Cole in 2000; and of course the attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon in September 2001.” The truth, admitted a CIA station chief, “was that the agency at the height of its powers had a great reputation and a terrible record.” It never had a single Soviet spy “who had deep insight into the workings of the Kremlin,” and thus didn’t know communism was collapsing. “The one crime of lasting consequence has been the CIA’s inability to carry out its central mission: informing the president of what is happening in the world,” writes Weiner. Its record in the real world is one of “fleeting successes and long-lasting failures.” The politicization and weaponization of the CIA for ideological aims has occurred for decades. The CIA’s charter prevents it from spying on Americans and yet it has done so repeatedly, from opening mail to spying on students. Between 1947 and 1963, the CIA was “a dark and invasive force — at home and abroad — violating citizens’ privacy, kidnapping, torturing, and killing at will,” concluded David Talbot in his 686-page history of the CIA, The Devil’s Chessboard. There were many reforms proposed in the 1970s. In 1975, Congress held hearings, revealing CIA misdeeds around the world, including assassinations using a heart attack gun, and efforts at mind control. Congress then took steps to provide greater oversight of the CIA and more protections for whistleblowers. Calls for reforms began again in the 1990s after a decade of CIA scandals in the 1980s, which included selling weapons to the Iranian government and illegally diverting the money to an equally illegal war in Central America. In 1991 and 1996, the US Senator from New York, Patrick Moynihan, who had been one of America’s most influential public intellectuals for thirty years, proposed abolishing the CIA entirely and reassigning its various functions to the State Department. The proposal never came up for a vote. In 1998, America’s intelligence leaders warned the White House that America would suffer “a catastrophic, systemic failure,” unless the U.S. dramatically changed how it gathered and analyzed intelligence. That didn’t happen. Then, in 2001, the CIA failed to communicate with the FBI and thus played a central role in allowing the 9/11 attacks to happen. In 2002, the CIA manipulated intelligence that led to the catastrophic invasion of Iraq. In response to these failures, Congress in 2004 sought to reform the agency and the broader Intelligence Community. The intent of Congress in passing new legislation was to reduce the power of the CIA, and its Director, and increase the power of a new intelligence coordinator role, which it called the Director of National Intelligence. That didn’t happen. The “CIA is broken,” wrote John Judis one year later. The 2004 reform act didn’t address the “historical problems with the CIA.” “To repair it,” he concluded, “we may need to start from scratch.” That didn’t happen either. In 2016 and 2017, the CIA manipulated intelligence to falsely frame the democratically elected U.S. president as a puppet for a foreign power, and from 2016 to 2020, individuals who worked at the CIA oversaw various efforts to control what people are allowed to say on social media. Neither the Russiagate hoax scandal nor the CIA’s role in creating a Censorship Industrial Complex resulted in reform or even serious calls for it by Congress. Multiple sources tell Public that the CIA remains both the dominant agency of the 18 total in the IC, and the one most resistant to reforms. The Washington Post reported last week that the CIA resisted efforts for greater transparency led by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. And now the CIA has said we should ignore the whistleblowing by one of its most trusted senior analysts, and their demands for reform. None of this is new. In 1947, the year Congress created the CIA, the Secretary of State at the time, Dean Acheson, said he “had the gravest forebodings” about it and “warned the President that neither he” nor anyone else would be able “to control it.” Between 1947 and 2005 there were 14 major studies by various bodies into how to reform the IC. The CIA “has had an almost perfect record of resisting fundamental changes,” noted Weiner in his 2006 book. Meanwhile, Congress has failed its Constitutional duty to provide oversight. “The CIA has tried to assassinate foreign leaders, mined harbors, and most recently, tortured prisoners,” wrote Judis in 2005. “If Congress had openly debated these actions, they would not have been approved.” They didn’t and have never much demanded to be able to. Members of Congress “have been derelict in this work for much of the past three decades,” noted Weiner two years later, “but their conduct since 9/11 has bordered on criminal negligence.” Looking at the full historical record, it is hard not to conclude that the American people only partially govern themselves, that we are burdened with a rogue and violent intelligence agency that continuously interferes not only in foreign elections and governments but also our own, and that many on the Right and the Left who appear to be in a position to change that refuse to do so. Why is that? Why have Congress and the American people failed for 80 years to reform a rogue intelligence agency that is not only ineffective but also destructive to the point of undermining national security? And what, if anything, can be done about it? If you're not already a subscriber, please subscribe now to support Public's defense of free speech and democracy, watch the rest of the video, and read the rest of the article!
7:37

“Totalitarian” Powers, Fear, And Psychopathy Behind CIA’s Secret Rule Over U.S. The agency remains out of control, beyond the law, and a direct threat to democracy and freedom, including in the U.S. by Michael Shellenberger Last week, we published two stories about a senior CIA whistleblower who was one of four CIA analysts who helped write a January 2017 “Intelligence Community Assessment” (ICA) that falsely claimed, with high confidence, that Russian President Vladimir Putin sought to help elect President Donald Trump in 2016. The person said that the CIA Director under Obama, John Brennan, had a “pathological need for control” and put the writers of the ICA “under duress” to include a mention of a fraudulent dossier, commissioned by the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. The CIA also included in the classified version of the ICA an annex consisting of the dossier written by a former British spy, which went to roughly 200 people in Washington, some of whom leaked related information to journalists. Unfortunately, the CIA employee said, his employer remains corrupted by “systemic rot” and that crucial steps “have not been put in place" to prevent a Russiagate-like abuse of power from happening again, since the arrival of its new director, John Ratcliffe, in January of this year. “Two critical steps that have not been put in place are,” said the senior analyst turned whistleblower, “to first, formalize expectations about the delivery timeline for sensitive intelligence analyses, and second, to remove the CIA Director from the review process of intelligence reporting or finished analysis.” In response to questions from Public, the CIA said it was taking necessary reforms. “Director Ratcliffe has overhauled the Agency senior ranks and revoked clearances from bad actors and even created a mission center to better execute on Presidential priorities like the Southern Border. The notion that he’s not making significant reforms or holding people and the Agency accountable is not just ridiculously false but beyond absurd.” But the CIA’s revoking security clearances and creating a mission center do not address either of the whistleblower’s recommendations, much less the “systemic rot” within the CIA. The whistleblower called for the removal of the Director of the CIA from review and writing of intelligence analysis, and taking a step to avoid rush jobs, like the kind Brennan used to create a deliberately misleading ICA in January 2017. The whistleblower’s credibility is high. They were one of just four CIA analysts chosen to help write a major ICA. That might make them seem biased toward Brennan, but Ratcliffe has retained the person, rather than fired them, which suggests that the Director or the direct reports he trusts view the person as valuable. Our sense was that the person was loyal to the CIA, wants to engage in objective apolitical analyses, and wants to remain at the CIA. Their two modest proposed reforms are consistent with loyalty to the CIA. As such, the person is precisely the kind of professional the CIA, Congress, and the American people should want to have in our institutions. If a legitimate criticism is to be made of the person it would be that they didn’t turn whistleblower earlier, which is the same criticism that could be made against hundreds and perhaps thousands of people involved in the Russiagate hoax. One might hope that it was just a bad day for the PR people at the CIA, and that Ratcliffe will be out with a new statement this week announcing new reforms, but we are not hopeful. The CIA appears to be following its informal motto, “Admit nothing, deny everything, and make counteraccusations.” That was the advice that former CIA Director Porter Goss said he would give to “a graduating class of CIA case officers” in 2006. The Russiagate hoax is hardly an unusual scandal in the history of the CIA. The agency has “long gone beyond the borders of American values,” noted Tim Weiner in his 812-page history, Legacy of Ashes. The CIA has murdered its employees, overthrown democracies, propped up dictatorships, tortured innocent people, trained death squads, induced mental illness in illegal medical experiments, spied illegally on law-abiding Americans, and may have been behind the assassination of an American president. All of these illegal behaviors required cover-ups, many of them elaborate. “Fundamentally, the founding fathers of U.S. intelligence were liars,” said James Angleton, one of the CIA’s founders, and its Director of Counterintelligence for two decades, on his deathbed in 1987. “If you were in a room with them, you were in a room full of people that you had to believe would deservedly end up in hell. I guess I will see them there soon.” The CIA’s record is poor when evaluated on its own terms. “The CIA was established to prevent unanticipated disasters, such as the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor,” noted John Judis in 2005, “but it has repeatedly failed to warn the White House of looming threats. It missed the North Korean invasion of the South in 1950, and the Chinese entry into the war that fall; Israel, France, and Great Britain's attack on the Suez Canal and Egypt in 1956; the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968; the Shah of Iran's ouster in 1979; the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan that year; the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in 1990; the Indian nuclear tests in 1998 (‘We didn't have a clue,’ CIA director George Tenet remarked afterwards); the attack on the World Trade Center in 1993; the bombing of American military barracks in Saudi Arabia in 1996 and of U.S. embassies in Africa in 1998; the attack on the USS Cole in 2000; and of course the attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon in September 2001.” The truth, admitted a CIA station chief, “was that the agency at the height of its powers had a great reputation and a terrible record.” It never had a single Soviet spy “who had deep insight into the workings of the Kremlin,” and thus didn’t know communism was collapsing. “The one crime of lasting consequence has been the CIA’s inability to carry out its central mission: informing the president of what is happening in the world,” writes Weiner. Its record in the real world is one of “fleeting successes and long-lasting failures.” The politicization and weaponization of the CIA for ideological aims has occurred for decades. The CIA’s charter prevents it from spying on Americans and yet it has done so repeatedly, from opening mail to spying on students. Between 1947 and 1963, the CIA was “a dark and invasive force — at home and abroad — violating citizens’ privacy, kidnapping, torturing, and killing at will,” concluded David Talbot in his 686-page history of the CIA, The Devil’s Chessboard. There were many reforms proposed in the 1970s. In 1975, Congress held hearings, revealing CIA misdeeds around the world, including assassinations using a heart attack gun, and efforts at mind control. Congress then took steps to provide greater oversight of the CIA and more protections for whistleblowers. Calls for reforms began again in the 1990s after a decade of CIA scandals in the 1980s, which included selling weapons to the Iranian government and illegally diverting the money to an equally illegal war in Central America. In 1991 and 1996, the US Senator from New York, Patrick Moynihan, who had been one of America’s most influential public intellectuals for thirty years, proposed abolishing the CIA entirely and reassigning its various functions to the State Department. The proposal never came up for a vote. In 1998, America’s intelligence leaders warned the White House that America would suffer “a catastrophic, systemic failure,” unless the U.S. dramatically changed how it gathered and analyzed intelligence. That didn’t happen. Then, in 2001, the CIA failed to communicate with the FBI and thus played a central role in allowing the 9/11 attacks to happen. In 2002, the CIA manipulated intelligence that led to the catastrophic invasion of Iraq. In response to these failures, Congress in 2004 sought to reform the agency and the broader Intelligence Community. The intent of Congress in passing new legislation was to reduce the power of the CIA, and its Director, and increase the power of a new intelligence coordinator role, which it called the Director of National Intelligence. That didn’t happen. The “CIA is broken,” wrote John Judis one year later. The 2004 reform act didn’t address the “historical problems with the CIA.” “To repair it,” he concluded, “we may need to start from scratch.” That didn’t happen either. In 2016 and 2017, the CIA manipulated intelligence to falsely frame the democratically elected U.S. president as a puppet for a foreign power, and from 2016 to 2020, individuals who worked at the CIA oversaw various efforts to control what people are allowed to say on social media. Neither the Russiagate hoax scandal nor the CIA’s role in creating a Censorship Industrial Complex resulted in reform or even serious calls for it by Congress. Multiple sources tell Public that the CIA remains both the dominant agency of the 18 total in the IC, and the one most resistant to reforms. The Washington Post reported last week that the CIA resisted efforts for greater transparency led by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. And now the CIA has said we should ignore the whistleblowing by one of its most trusted senior analysts, and their demands for reform. None of this is new. In 1947, the year Congress created the CIA, the Secretary of State at the time, Dean Acheson, said he “had the gravest forebodings” about it and “warned the President that neither he” nor anyone else would be able “to control it.” Between 1947 and 2005 there were 14 major studies by various bodies into how to reform the IC. The CIA “has had an almost perfect record of resisting fundamental changes,” noted Weiner in his 2006 book. Meanwhile, Congress has failed its Constitutional duty to provide oversight. “The CIA has tried to assassinate foreign leaders, mined harbors, and most recently, tortured prisoners,” wrote Judis in 2005. “If Congress had openly debated these actions, they would not have been approved.” They didn’t and have never much demanded to be able to. Members of Congress “have been derelict in this work for much of the past three decades,” noted Weiner two years later, “but their conduct since 9/11 has bordered on criminal negligence.” Looking at the full historical record, it is hard not to conclude that the American people only partially govern themselves, that we are burdened with a rogue and violent intelligence agency that continuously interferes not only in foreign elections and governments but also our own, and that many on the Right and the Left who appear to be in a position to change that refuse to do so. Why is that? Why have Congress and the American people failed for 80 years to reform a rogue intelligence agency that is not only ineffective but also destructive to the point of undermining national security? And what, if anything, can be done about it? If you're not already a subscriber, please subscribe now to support Public's defense of free speech and democracy, watch the rest of the video, and read the rest of the article!

Michael Shellenberger

48,655 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🔥Breaking! Meet the War Games movie which was released right before the election. And based on, real life, War Gaming that happened in 2022 with the deepstate. They ain’t hiding anything, and it includes an all star, anti Trump cast. The group included Republicans, Democrats and those who identified as non-partisan. Among them were two former US Senators, a US Governor, a handful of retired generals, and veterans of the CIA, FBI, DHS, and DOD. The exercise would be set in a representation of the White House Situation Room, the underground command center where the President manages civilian and military crises. Some of the involved individuals: - Alexander Vindman -GENERAL (RET.) WESLEY CLARK -SEN. DOUG JONES Alabama -David Priess served as a CIA officer during both the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations -PETER STRZOK -Fred Wellman (Lincoln Project) - Bill Kristol can be seen in the background among the various consultants Quote from the video: “You can authorize lethal force.” And what was just changed by Biden on an executive order? These are the things Democrat wet dreams are built on. The video even included an assassination attempt on one of the candidates. “A real-life political thriller set on January 6, 2025, War Game imagines a nation-wide insurrection in which members of the US military defect to support the losing Presidential candidate, while the winning candidate and his advisors—played by an all-star roster of senior officials from the last five administrations—war games the crisis in the White House situation room. They have 6 hours to save democracy as the country teeters on the brink of civil war.” So where did they think up the idea for this movie? “When the nonprofit Vet Voice Foundation organized the six-hour unscripted exercise — inspired by a Washington Post op-ed from three retired generals — exactly one year after the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection, former president Donald Trump was still in retreat at Mar-a-Lago and Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) was the party’s rising star. They brought in two documentarians, Jesse Moss (“Boys State”) and Tony Gerber (“Full Battle Rattle”), to build a set that looked like the situation room and film the action in a hotel where insurrectionists had stayed.” (Vet Voices is supported by Priorities USA ) “I think the stakes that we confronted on January 6th, 2022, in this hotel ballroom in D.C., are even more so depressingly higher today than they were then,” says former Montana Gov. Steve Bullock (D), who plays the president in the exercise.” Interestingly a Serbian Otpor founder was present at one of the screenings. War Game screening and panel discussion at the Tides Advocacy, Movement Infrastructure Project. “Ivan Marovic- Executive Director, International Center on Nonviolent Conflict, and core member of OTPOR!, a youth movement which played a critical role in bringing down Serbian dictator Slobodan Milosevic. Advisor for pro-democracy groups around the world, and has been designing and developing learning programs on civil resistance and movement building, and supporting the development of training organizations, such as Rhize and the African Coaching Network.” The founder of the Movement Infrastructure project, in an X post, told JD Vance to jump from a building. In September 2024, Gov. Josh Shapiro joined the directors and participants from War Game Film to discuss an all too plausible crisis and what to do about it. Sources to follow, including the long list of names that should be nothing near a Trump admin.
1:59

🔥Breaking! Meet the War Games movie which was released right before the election. And based on, real life, War Gaming that happened in 2022 with the deepstate. They ain’t hiding anything, and it includes an all star, anti Trump cast. The group included Republicans, Democrats and those who identified as non-partisan. Among them were two former US Senators, a US Governor, a handful of retired generals, and veterans of the CIA, FBI, DHS, and DOD. The exercise would be set in a representation of the White House Situation Room, the underground command center where the President manages civilian and military crises. Some of the involved individuals: - Alexander Vindman -GENERAL (RET.) WESLEY CLARK -SEN. DOUG JONES Alabama -David Priess served as a CIA officer during both the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations -PETER STRZOK -Fred Wellman (Lincoln Project) - Bill Kristol can be seen in the background among the various consultants Quote from the video: “You can authorize lethal force.” And what was just changed by Biden on an executive order? These are the things Democrat wet dreams are built on. The video even included an assassination attempt on one of the candidates. “A real-life political thriller set on January 6, 2025, War Game imagines a nation-wide insurrection in which members of the US military defect to support the losing Presidential candidate, while the winning candidate and his advisors—played by an all-star roster of senior officials from the last five administrations—war games the crisis in the White House situation room. They have 6 hours to save democracy as the country teeters on the brink of civil war.” So where did they think up the idea for this movie? “When the nonprofit Vet Voice Foundation organized the six-hour unscripted exercise — inspired by a Washington Post op-ed from three retired generals — exactly one year after the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection, former president Donald Trump was still in retreat at Mar-a-Lago and Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) was the party’s rising star. They brought in two documentarians, Jesse Moss (“Boys State”) and Tony Gerber (“Full Battle Rattle”), to build a set that looked like the situation room and film the action in a hotel where insurrectionists had stayed.” (Vet Voices is supported by Priorities USA ) “I think the stakes that we confronted on January 6th, 2022, in this hotel ballroom in D.C., are even more so depressingly higher today than they were then,” says former Montana Gov. Steve Bullock (D), who plays the president in the exercise.” Interestingly a Serbian Otpor founder was present at one of the screenings. War Game screening and panel discussion at the Tides Advocacy, Movement Infrastructure Project. “Ivan Marovic- Executive Director, International Center on Nonviolent Conflict, and core member of OTPOR!, a youth movement which played a critical role in bringing down Serbian dictator Slobodan Milosevic. Advisor for pro-democracy groups around the world, and has been designing and developing learning programs on civil resistance and movement building, and supporting the development of training organizations, such as Rhize and the African Coaching Network.” The founder of the Movement Infrastructure project, in an X post, told JD Vance to jump from a building. In September 2024, Gov. Josh Shapiro joined the directors and participants from War Game Film to discuss an all too plausible crisis and what to do about it. Sources to follow, including the long list of names that should be nothing near a Trump admin.

Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻

21,088 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ed Dowd: "5.5 million [Americans] have been disabled since 2021 according to [the Bureau of Labor Statistics] survey...[and this] seems to be an elephant in the room with [the Trump] administration. They don't want to talk about mRNA; they talk about everything else, but." This clip of former BlackRock fund manager and founder of Phinance Technologies Edward Dowd (Edward Dowd) is taken from an interview with Greg Hunter (Greg Hunter) posted to Rumble on June 25, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Starting In February of 2021, the Disability Survey took off and it reached a high in September of 2022 of 3 million. Went sideways for a while. Then went to a new high in June. Of 23, added another million. So we were at 4. Then it went sideways again. Then in November of last year, it went to 4.7 million at And then in this last month, May, it went up another 739,000. So we're at five and a half million of disabled people identifying as disabled. "And the thing I want people to understand, this is not tied to Social Security disability. This is just a survey of people indicating answering one of six questions. And so it's a good broad indicator of the health of the populace. And the populace is getting more disabled as time goes on. And the number, the increase has been 16% since 2021. Five and a half million people have been disabled since 2021, according to this survey. And, you know, this is not something that can be hidden. It comes out every month. We don't even have to do any analysis on it. It's just a number produced by the BLS and it's up and to the right. "And if you look, you know, if you're, if you're a chartist or a technical analyst and you're in the financial markets, it looks like a bullish trend that isn't stopping anytime soon. It goes up to a new high, consolidates for a while, then breaks out again. If this was a growth stock, I'd be all over it and I'd be long. "Yeah, so there's a funnel. We've identified injured, disabled, then dead. And the injured go to disabled. Disabled go to dead. And so this is, you know, look, as far as I'm concerned, all of our work on our website, has proven to me without a doubt that Something happened in 2021. Mandates and a vaccine that caused the health of the country to deteriorate, you know, greatly in terms of excess death, disabilities and injuries, which we, you know, you know, which we monitor via absentee rates and work time lost. So people are. People are more sick, they eventually get disabled and they eventually die. "And look, this chef. I have no idea if the vax caused her death. We don't get into— I never talk about individual death because that's, you know, I don't know. I don't have the autopsy report, but what I do know is the metadata. The big data says something drastically changed in 2021. It's a disaster. I believe it's the vaccine. And at, the very least, what I find interesting is there seems to be no curiosity about it, even with the new administration. Unfortunately, there seems to be an elephant in the room with this administration. They don't want to talk about mRNA, they talk about everything else, but."
3:25

Ed Dowd: "5.5 million [Americans] have been disabled since 2021 according to [the Bureau of Labor Statistics] survey...[and this] seems to be an elephant in the room with [the Trump] administration. They don't want to talk about mRNA; they talk about everything else, but." This clip of former BlackRock fund manager and founder of Phinance Technologies Edward Dowd (Edward Dowd) is taken from an interview with Greg Hunter (Greg Hunter) posted to Rumble on June 25, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Starting In February of 2021, the Disability Survey took off and it reached a high in September of 2022 of 3 million. Went sideways for a while. Then went to a new high in June. Of 23, added another million. So we were at 4. Then it went sideways again. Then in November of last year, it went to 4.7 million at And then in this last month, May, it went up another 739,000. So we're at five and a half million of disabled people identifying as disabled. "And the thing I want people to understand, this is not tied to Social Security disability. This is just a survey of people indicating answering one of six questions. And so it's a good broad indicator of the health of the populace. And the populace is getting more disabled as time goes on. And the number, the increase has been 16% since 2021. Five and a half million people have been disabled since 2021, according to this survey. And, you know, this is not something that can be hidden. It comes out every month. We don't even have to do any analysis on it. It's just a number produced by the BLS and it's up and to the right. "And if you look, you know, if you're, if you're a chartist or a technical analyst and you're in the financial markets, it looks like a bullish trend that isn't stopping anytime soon. It goes up to a new high, consolidates for a while, then breaks out again. If this was a growth stock, I'd be all over it and I'd be long. "Yeah, so there's a funnel. We've identified injured, disabled, then dead. And the injured go to disabled. Disabled go to dead. And so this is, you know, look, as far as I'm concerned, all of our work on our website, has proven to me without a doubt that Something happened in 2021. Mandates and a vaccine that caused the health of the country to deteriorate, you know, greatly in terms of excess death, disabilities and injuries, which we, you know, you know, which we monitor via absentee rates and work time lost. So people are. People are more sick, they eventually get disabled and they eventually die. "And look, this chef. I have no idea if the vax caused her death. We don't get into— I never talk about individual death because that's, you know, I don't know. I don't have the autopsy report, but what I do know is the metadata. The big data says something drastically changed in 2021. It's a disaster. I believe it's the vaccine. And at, the very least, what I find interesting is there seems to be no curiosity about it, even with the new administration. Unfortunately, there seems to be an elephant in the room with this administration. They don't want to talk about mRNA, they talk about everything else, but."

Sense Receptor

16,888 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr