Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

While the battle over Zimbabwe's constitutional amendments to extend President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s term, lengthen presidential tenure and introduce a raft of controversial political, electoral and governance reforms intensifies across the country, main opposition leader Nelson Chamisa has taken a curious position which says "there is no constitution in this...

109,783 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 34

Фото профиля mktshuks
mktshuks6 месяцев назад

Chamisa knows better than most of u here. Zanu has long suspended the constitution, only u were not paying attention. What constitution allowed Tshabangu to recall those MPs? Which constitution allowed @ZECzim not to publish all election results? They don't respect è constitution

Фото профиля Kuda Chaps
Kuda Chaps6 месяцев назад

Saka paari kuti problem is "constitutional order" hauna kupanzwa! Now please tell us which constitution was being followed in; -Disobedience of Court Orders? -Interference with the Judiciary? -Selective Application of the Law? -Manipulation of Bail Conditions? -Restriction of Freedom of Assembly and Association? -Arbitrary Arrests and Detentions? -State-Sponsored Violence and Torture? -Constitutional Amendment No. 2? -Electoral Irregularities and Militarization? -Partisan Electoral Commission? -Intimidation by Traditional Leaders? -Disregard for Court Rulings? -Prolonged Pretrial Detention? -Non-Implementation of Devolution? -Arbitrary Recall of Elected Opposition Lawmakers? -Abuse of the Recall Provision by "Imposters"? -Weaponization of the Speaker’s Office? Hindaba muchida kunyepera kudzungaira????

Фото профиля Unkamfortable Kwestions.
Unkamfortable Kwestions.6 месяцев назад

This dude should give up politics ongodya anywhere zvake. He is embarrassing himself.

Фото профиля Presidential Spokesperson
Presidential Spokesperson6 месяцев назад

You must decide: remain NewsHawks or become hawkers and peddlers of falsehoods and petty comparisons. The President and Citizen Volunteers are fully engaged in a nationwide program of action with a clear plan, timeline, and strategy, a revolutionary program designed to end the governance and constitutional crisis that has plagued our country since 1980. That plan has time for everything: time for the invisible, painstaking work of building and fortification, and time for visibility, speeches, and cameras. Equally so, comparing us to a civil society organization exposes shallow analysis: civil society organizations by nature reacts issue by issue; a political movement confronts the entire system and works to transform it structurally. That is why our approach, our timing, and our visibility will always differ. WE HAVE A STRUCTURAL NO TO THIS MADENESS !

Фото профиля DAZ Intelligence
DAZ Intelligence6 месяцев назад

These days this handle is not writing anything meaningful except kudzokorora news dzegore rakapera to try and smear the name of Chamisa trying to prop up chi new PDP party cha Biti chisina kana vanhu ichi. Hopewell and his ghosts are the only replies on this post.@drjaytee87

Фото профиля LionDRED
LionDRED6 месяцев назад

There is a constitution! The fact that it's being abused & violated does not negate its validity. It simply evidences that those violating it are acting in an unconstitutional manner. Chamisa's argument here is regrettably flawed & difficult to defend.

Фото профиля Dr. Dr. Moses Tofa.
Dr. Dr. Moses Tofa.6 месяцев назад

Advocate Chamisa is the most popular opposition leader but tragically, he does not look fit for purpose and the earlier opposition supporters acknowledge that brutal reality, the better.

Фото профиля Chimurenga
Chimurenga6 месяцев назад

He appears to be fighting those who are defending and fighting or doing something about the current fiasco and morass! He appears to do so very consistently!!

Фото профиля The Village Shoroma.
The Village Shoroma.6 месяцев назад

You're doing all this as a way of propping up PDP, we are not fools.

Фото профиля Black Consciousness
Black Consciousness6 месяцев назад

I was very disappointed by @nelsonchamisa ’s apparent lack of fight for the people’s vote after the last election but I think I understand his position on this one. This 2030 thing is just a symptom of ZANU’s absolute disregard for the rule of law or peoples’ opinions!

Фото профиля Simon Hove
Simon Hove6 месяцев назад

NC’s mindset on any Zimbabwean struggle/political issue that doesn’t make him the supreme power is not worth his energy as he believes he has most citizens’ support, also not joining in deals fatal blow to his political opponents and only him shall remain standing in any race.

Фото профиля Mr_kays
Mr_kays6 месяцев назад

Chamisa is very delusional. He thinks he has so much influence that he actually doesn't have. He still repeat the 2050 thing becoz somehow he believes if he mentions 2030 he'd give that 2030 phrase relevance & make it popular. Sadly, the presidential election ban is aimed at him

Фото профиля Cde Musa Tshabalala 🇷🇺
Cde Musa Tshabalala 🇷🇺6 месяцев назад

In the New Zimbabwe Chamisa should also be arrested. He is a big hindrance to the struggle.

Фото профиля nitro
nitro6 месяцев назад

ZANUPF is the worst thing to have ever happened to Zimbabwe. Chamisa is the worst thing to have happened to change that. He should've stood aside and not forced his way to be Tsvangirai's successor. He isn't Mugabe but he has such a high level of arrogance and self-centredness

Фото профиля Wasu_Reloaded
Wasu_Reloaded6 месяцев назад

I have said it a few times - @nelsonchamisa needs a political communications professional. A media professional. He trusts himself too much. Even Obama, or closer home E.D., do not trust themselves 100% on everything. They outsource. @Cde_Ostallos @Laque_davis @advocatemahere

Фото профиля The Watchman
The Watchman6 месяцев назад

@daddyhope Nelson Chamisa’s intelligence or rather political wisdom is overrated. He is a little naive, cowardly, & apathetic about everything. His action is only talking & wowing his followers & not addressing key matters head on. He circles around issues that demands his aggression.

Фото профиля Joshua Nkomo Lite✊🏾
Joshua Nkomo Lite✊🏾6 месяцев назад

He is dillusional ! Does he even know that his quest of becoming a President through popular vote is under threat?

Фото профиля squash
squash6 месяцев назад

@daddyhope This @nelsonchamisa guy is overrated. I’ve never seen anyone fight so hard to lose.

Фото профиля Goromigo
Goromigo6 месяцев назад

😎☝️💩@daddyhope propaganda ‼️

Фото профиля FritzP
FritzP6 месяцев назад

This is embarassing from you @NewsHawksLive hamunyari here? It's not Chamisa changing the constitution, it's not Chamisa championing 2030, it's not Chamisa causing this country to suffer. Why are you recycling "there is no constitution to defend" as if it's recent news. Miswai imi

Фото профиля Vim IL Sung ✊🏾Juche🧠🦾
Vim IL Sung ✊🏾Juche🧠🦾6 месяцев назад

He trampled all over the MDC constitution 4 power so doesn't have the answers 2 the constitutional problem. He handed 2 elections 2 Zanu - incomplete, treachery or both. He take ED & Genarari to gate crash a sick mdc president's home unannounced? He died soon after.

Фото профиля TNgaris
TNgaris6 месяцев назад

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 @hwendec akakuudzai wani kuti chakanwirwa ichi muchingowomoka pano.

Фото профиля Thabiso
Thabiso6 месяцев назад

Why don’t you give him right if reply and hear his exact thoughts ! Journalistic ethics 101

Фото профиля Dereck Tafuma
Dereck Tafuma6 месяцев назад

He is slowly losing relevance.

Фото профиля Martin Tafadzwa
Martin Tafadzwa6 месяцев назад

😂but he has a law firm operating under the same “constitution”, double standards

Фото профиля LH1
LH16 месяцев назад

Hondo yenyu naChamisa ihuru chose.

Фото профиля Makuvaza Edmore
Makuvaza Edmore6 месяцев назад

provisions and by laws wr abused b4 & ple ignored, this law is only one in many laws that were illegally amented & no one defended, are we going to defend 1 law in the whole constitution (zimbabwe).How many laws that does not required referendum but illegally changed .#DefendZim

Фото профиля Tawanda Mupindu
Tawanda Mupindu6 месяцев назад

Anorwara uyu, vanosekerera ndovakadhakwa! I voted for him believing that he was for the people, I didn't know that he is very reckless with words like this!

Фото профиля ThinkTank
ThinkTank6 месяцев назад

He still confuses me this guy.

Фото профиля Mr P.C
Mr P.C6 месяцев назад

He could be right! Is there anything constitutional in the country? Is there anything constitutional in the crime scene? Methinks that noise should be made from all directions! It's a big mess! We said it! Vanofanirwa kumiswa, asi. Miswai! No to Nonsense!

Фото профиля Patrice Lumumba
Patrice Lumumba6 месяцев назад

Mr chamisa is a GOAT. He is right we can't fight the wrong fight.

Фото профиля Dylan maduchasi
Dylan maduchasi6 месяцев назад

Kakachinwira kamusatanyoko kemunhu!

Фото профиля Chikara_Chikara
Chikara_Chikara6 месяцев назад

Madness.

Фото профиля .🇿🇼🌍♥️💻
.🇿🇼🌍♥️💻6 месяцев назад

This is sad. 😔 Chamisa loves words and phrases that never mean anything, no practical way forward, just dancing around blaming people for not converging while giving zanu pf a green light to attack us. You lead how with what vehicle, as who?

Похожие видео

#OppositionDividedWeakParalysed While main opposition leader Nelson Chamisa has relatively been quiet - conspicuous by his absence from action and loud silence, except for his occasional political posturing and symbolic resistance with a religious-style approach under his Agenda 2026 in a bid to reboot his sluggish career, his former ally in the opposition trenches Tendai Biti has taken a more vocal, confrontational, high-profile legal and public-outreach role opposing the government on its constitutional amendments to facilitate President Emmerson Mnangagwa's term extension and a raft of reforms changing the political, electoral and governance systems. Upon his return to active politics in January after a controversial two-year hiatus following the capture by Zanu PF of his CCC opposition party, Chamisa focused on "Agenda 2026" as a movement intended to rebuild Zimbabwe through a citizen-driven dialogue rather than traditional party politics. While he has launched this initiative and occasionally commented on social media to oppose Zanu PF's "2050 agenda" - incomprehensibly referring to the 2030 agenda - his public engagement has been characterised more by statements of intent, use of symbols and preaching "change" rather than organising grassroots resistance given his huge popular support base. He has defended his strange "No to 2050" social media post and castigated violence against citizens opposing constitutional changes, maintaining a symbolic rather than confrontational role. In the process, Chamisa has now become the weak link within the opposition movement. By constrast, Biti, who has no popular social base, has been highly vocal, acting as the convener of the Constitution Defenders Forum. Others who have been vocal include Jameson Timba as Convenor of Constitutional Defence Forum, Job Sikhala who leads National Democratic Working Group, Lovemore Madhuku and his National Constitutional Assembly, and strong-willed opposition figure Jacob Ngarivhume, among others. Biti has launched a vigorous campaign against Constitution Amendment No. 3, which aims to extend presidential terms beyond 2028 and change the political system. He has referred to the proposed changes as "legal lunacy" and a "quiet constitutional coup". Furthermore, Biti has taken the fight directly to the people, conducting door-to-door mobilisation drives and street campaigns in areas like Chitungwiza and Mutare to educate citizens on the implications of the reforms. Alongside other activists, he has filed urgent court bids to stop police from disrupting their private meetings regarding the constitutional reforms. As a result, Biti was yesterday arrested while organising a rally against the amendments in Mutare. Biti has invited Chamisa to work with him and others in fighting the current constitutional changes. However, Chamisa, despite his massive support, has distanced himself from Biti, Timba and others. He has been pussyfooting and claiming there is no constitution to defend, alarming his opposition allies. Despite pressure to take a form a party and adopt more aggressive approach, Chamisa maintains a propositional posture, making his politics and pronouncements merely symbolic opposition, not serious resistance anymore. This comes as the opposition is divided, weak and paralysed. The absence of a strong opposition and check on power has allowed for the proposal of constitutional amendments that extend the presidential terms from five to seven years and Mnangagwa's term extension, accompanied by raft of contentious changes in the political system. As formal opposition parties have fragmented and weakened, civil society groups and grassroots movements have increasingly taken centre stage in protesting government policies, human rights issues and the current constitutional amendments.

TheNewsHawks

12,003 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🔵As debate on Constitutional Amendment Bill N0.3 intensifies, Zanu PF Treasurer-General Patrick Chinamasa, who has been at the centre of the process since its inception at the ruling party's 2024 annual conference in Bulawayo, explains why he has now changed his position on the referendum, deals with relevant provisions on presidential term limits, length of terms, electoral system and cycle, electing a president through parliament, one man one vote or universal adult suffrage, plebiscite and official reasons for proposed changes to the political, electoral and governance systems. Chinamasa sits down with ZiFM Stereo News Digital Editor Anesu Masamvu for an in-depth interview on the growing debate on the constitutional amendments. The Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 3) Bill, 2026, gazetted on February 16, contains 21 key clauses or provisions aimed at amending the country's 2013 constitution. The contentious initiative has divided the nation and public opinion. Authorities say this will bring long-term national stability and progress, while critics argue it is a constitutional coup and will also undermine democratic governance in the process. In this interview, Chinamasa unpacks the legal rationale behind government’s current position that no referendum is required when critics say it is unavoidable, explains why the proposed changes do not amount to a third term, and weighs in on concerns about electoral system changes, parliamentary selection of the president, and democratic legitimacy in local politics.

TheNewsHawks

27,088 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

President Emmerson Mnangagwa's spokesman George Charamba, who is also the Deputy Chief Secretary, Presidential Communications in the Office of the President and Cabinet, has provoked a storm of controversy by claiming that parliament trumps a national referendum on constitutional amendment issues currently being debated through a legislative public consultation process. Mnangagwa and his party are using parliament to amend the constitution to extend his rule to 2030 and introduce a raft of other significant changes without going through a referendum, which civil society and opposition activists insist is a requirement in terms of the constitution. The 2013 constitution mandates that any extension of presidential term limits or removal of two five-year term limits must be approved by voters through a referendum. Critics say extending terms from five to seven years, or changing the electoral system constitutes a major subversion of this clause, requiring a referendum. However, Mnangagwa and his allies say a referendum is not needed as they are not removing term limits, but elongating the term lengths and changing the electoral cycle. Zanu PF says the amendment is not a change to the limit of two terms, but rather the length of each term (five to seven years), meaning a referendum is not constitutionally mandated. They say the amendments are meant to ensure political stability and remove "election mode toxicity," disrupting peace, governance and development. The debate centres over holding a referendum on the proposed amendments, specifically Constitution Amendment Bill No.3, which proposes extending Mnangagwa's tenure by two years andpresidential and parliamentary terms from five to seven years as well as changing the presidential election system from direct voting through popular franchise to indirect selection via parliament. The ruling Zanu PF party controls parliament, leading to calls for a popular referendum to approve these significant changes, which critics argue violate the 2013 constitution's democratic intent. Charamba said: “Those who were old enough to participate and follow proceedings of 2013 will know that even after the referendum, that outcome of the referendum still had to be processed through Parliament. What that means is that, a referendum does not usurp the power of Parliament. It simply provides a popular basis for legislative action. Otherwise, at law, the body which is recognized as responsible for any changes, be they at the level of the primary law or at the level of subsidiary laws, is Parliament. Right? So, really, you can't place the referendum in apposition to Parliament. You can't. You just cannot because the referendum does not give you a result that writes the constitution. It is parliament which is mandated to do so in terms of our law. So, really, there shouldn't be any argument at all in respect of that matter. Right?.”

TheNewsHawks

16,586 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Professor Lovemore Madhuku in his Own Words Making the Case for Parliament to Indirectly Elect the President as an Electoral College: “We must not put in the Constitution of the country a provision that is dependant on what happens in a political party. That’s the point I’m making. We must never say in our Constitution of Zimbabwe that if a sitting President dies or resigns, we will wait to hear what the political party of that President is saying. No. That is not the best way of running a country. Political parties remain the preserve of those people who are in those political parties. But the country is run on the basis of either an election by the people—direct election—or you have Parliament as an institution sitting as an electoral college. Where parties have influence, they must do the influence within Parliament, but never to allow the political party to sit there to say I’m giving you this President, and so forth. That’s the point I’m making. And on that point, I’m making it right across the world; that’s what they do.” - Professor Madhuku, addressing a “Heal Zimbabwe Trust” public meeting in Harare on 22 February 2020. COMMENT: Professor Lovemore Madhuku’s 2020 remarks make a clear, powerful and enduring case for Clause 3 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe (Amendment No. 3) H.B.I. Bill, 2026. This clause replaces the direct election of the President with an indirect election by Parliament sitting jointly as an electoral college; both after every general election and, when necessary, to fill any vacancy in the office of President. The current direct election of the President was first introduced in anticipation of a legislated one-party-one-man rule through Constitution Amendment No. 7, Act 1987 in the old Lancaster Constitution repealed in 2013. Professor Madhuku put it plainly: The Constitution should not—as it currently does— depend on the internal decisions of a political party to select a successor to the President of the country. When a sitting President dies, resigns or is removed, the nation should not have to wait and hear what that President’s political party “is saying.” That is not a constitutionally proper way to run a country. Political parties exist for their own members. The country, however, belongs to all Zimbabweans. The proper solution is straightforward: Parliament—the institution chosen by the people—should act as the electoral college. Inside that open forum, parties may exercise their influence transparently and accountably. No party should ever stand outside the Constitution and simply “give” the nation its next leader. This principle is not abstract. Worldwide, presidential by-elections to fill mid-term vacancies are extremely rare. Most stable presidential systems instead use automatic succession by a deputy or, increasingly, allow the legislature to elect a successor who serves out the remainder of the term. These arrangements place national continuity and stability above partisan interests. Clause 3 of the Bill follows exactly this proven path. By giving Parliament the clear duty to elect the President—whether at the start of a new term or in an unforeseen vacancy—Zimbabwe will secure stronger democratic stability, and keep the highest office firmly within the people’s constitutional framework rather than the private control of any single party. In short, Clause 3 is a mature, practical and principled reform that directly honours Professor Madhuku’s wise 2020 counsel. As such, it deserves the full support of every well-meaning Zimbabwean who values good governance, democratic constitutionalism, institutional integrity and the long-term strength of the country’s democracy in the national interest!

Prof Jonathan Moyo

88,259 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад