Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

White cougar MILF coaches a young bull on how to please her properly while her husband watches. 🔥 #Interracial #BNWO #Dominance #Kink #AfterDark #Taboo #AdultContent #NSFW #Fantasy #CougarLife #YoungBull #Hotwife #Cuckold #ForbiddenDesire #MatureWomen #NightVibes

tabooisnormal's profile picture

Noog Oobat

11,312 subscribers

23,722 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#Interracial#BNWO#Dominance#Kink#AfterDark#Taboo#AdultContent#NSFW#Fantasy#CougarLife#YoungBull#Hotwife#Cuckold#ForbiddenDesire#MatureWomen#NightVibes
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Seven months ago, her world collapsed in a single afternoon. While her husband was in the other room, she picked up his Apple Watch on impulse. In seconds, she read messages no wife should ever see — intimate, disgusting exchanges with another woman. The betrayal hit like a freight train. Twenty-four hours later, he and his parents walked out, leaving her alone with their two young daughters. She went from happily married to suddenly single, heartbroken, and the sole provider for her girls — all in one brutal day. The months that followed were devastating: divorce papers, sleepless nights, and the pain of losing the man she thought was her best friend and life partner. But something has shifted. For the first time in seven long months, she feels real hope. She looks at her daughters and sees a new beginning instead of just survival. She’s discovering a strength she never knew she had and building a life on her own terms. This is her comeback story. She’s proud of how far she’s come and excited for what’s next. The best chapters are still being written! Yay for Apple Watches ⌚️
3:08

Seven months ago, her world collapsed in a single afternoon. While her husband was in the other room, she picked up his Apple Watch on impulse. In seconds, she read messages no wife should ever see — intimate, disgusting exchanges with another woman. The betrayal hit like a freight train. Twenty-four hours later, he and his parents walked out, leaving her alone with their two young daughters. She went from happily married to suddenly single, heartbroken, and the sole provider for her girls — all in one brutal day. The months that followed were devastating: divorce papers, sleepless nights, and the pain of losing the man she thought was her best friend and life partner. But something has shifted. For the first time in seven long months, she feels real hope. She looks at her daughters and sees a new beginning instead of just survival. She’s discovering a strength she never knew she had and building a life on her own terms. This is her comeback story. She’s proud of how far she’s come and excited for what’s next. The best chapters are still being written! Yay for Apple Watches ⌚️

𝐿𝒶𝒹𝓎 𝒱 🥀

753,758 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Let’s talk about co-regulation - which, in the words of psychologist Jennifer Nurick, happens when “one nervous system calms another.” This video couldn’t be a lovelier example. Our hero has accidentally closed a door on her fingers. If you’ve ever done it you know it’s a special kind of pain. She’s understandably distraught. But mom is on the case. Watch how she coaches and manages her daughter’s response, giving her guidance on how to calm herself - both physically and emotionally. Take a deep breath. Say, “I’m okay.” Say, “I am strong.” Once she has her daughter talking, instead of crying (if even just barely), consider how skillfully she does what comes next. She keeps her daughter talking…extending the series of affirmations and allowing for additional time and space from the accident. Over the course of just 40 seconds mom deftly manages to shift the whole topic of the conversation. It begins with “I am hurt” and ends with “I am adored.” That’s some gold medal “momming” right there. 🥇 Never forget that as young children grow and learn, many of their most important skills abilities begin in a shared space - as partnerships with caring adults and more knowledgeable peers. What begins as co-regulation here will, in time become a set of tools that this sweet little one can employ on her own. What a lucky little girl. —— This is the part where you’ll notice that I ALWAYS credit and uplift the original creators of the videos I write about. In this case I’ve tried really hard, but have been unable to ascertain the original source. If you know it, please share so I can properly attribute to this absolutely top notch mother.
0:40

Let’s talk about co-regulation - which, in the words of psychologist Jennifer Nurick, happens when “one nervous system calms another.” This video couldn’t be a lovelier example. Our hero has accidentally closed a door on her fingers. If you’ve ever done it you know it’s a special kind of pain. She’s understandably distraught. But mom is on the case. Watch how she coaches and manages her daughter’s response, giving her guidance on how to calm herself - both physically and emotionally. Take a deep breath. Say, “I’m okay.” Say, “I am strong.” Once she has her daughter talking, instead of crying (if even just barely), consider how skillfully she does what comes next. She keeps her daughter talking…extending the series of affirmations and allowing for additional time and space from the accident. Over the course of just 40 seconds mom deftly manages to shift the whole topic of the conversation. It begins with “I am hurt” and ends with “I am adored.” That’s some gold medal “momming” right there. 🥇 Never forget that as young children grow and learn, many of their most important skills abilities begin in a shared space - as partnerships with caring adults and more knowledgeable peers. What begins as co-regulation here will, in time become a set of tools that this sweet little one can employ on her own. What a lucky little girl. —— This is the part where you’ll notice that I ALWAYS credit and uplift the original creators of the videos I write about. In this case I’ve tried really hard, but have been unable to ascertain the original source. If you know it, please share so I can properly attribute to this absolutely top notch mother.

Dan Wuori

254,821 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 MOSTLY PEACEFUL PHONE HEIST: Black 'Youth' Savagely Beats Defenseless White Woman for Her Cellphone – FBI + NCVS Data Expose the Ignored Epidemic: BLACK ON WHITE & BLACK ON BLACK VIOLENCE! 🔥 Surveillance footage doesn’t lie. Watch a young Black male storm a cellphone store and unleash a ferocious, unprovoked assault on an older White woman — dragging her down, pummeling her on the floor, stomping her while she’s helpless, then snatching her phone and bolting. “Procuring himself a new cellphone,” in the bitterly ironic words of one poster. One of the most sickening things you’ll see this week. Prayers for this poor woman. This isn’t random chaos. It’s a microcosm of a macro pattern criminologists have documented for decades, but polite society refuses to name. FBI Uniform Crime Reports (latest detailed tables) show African Americans — 13% of the U.S. population — account for 51–55% of murder offenders and ~33% of all violent crime arrests. Expanded Homicide Data: Black-on-White murders outnumber White-on-Black by more than 2-to-1 (566 vs. 246 in the 2019 snapshot; the ratio holds across years). The gold-standard National Crime Victimization Survey (BJS/NCVS), which bypasses police “bias” by asking victims directly who attacked them, confirms the same asymmetry: Black offenders commit the overwhelming majority of interracial violent crimes against Whites — robberies and assaults at rates 8–15 times higher per capita than the reverse. Intra-racial crime dominates overall, as it does in every group. But when violence crosses racial lines, the skew is not even close to symmetric. That is empirical reality, not narrative. Elites lecture endlessly about “systemic” this and “disparate impact” that — yet the data show the real disparate impact lands hardest on innocent victims of all races when we pretend group behavioral patterns don’t exist. We don’t solve problems by lying about them. We don’t have to live like this. Demand color-blind justice, relentless policing of violent predators, and cultural honesty that refuses excuses. The woman on the floor deserved better. So does every American tired of the euphemisms. Face the data. Enforce the law. Protect the vulnerable. #BlackOnWhiteCrimeReality #FBIStatsDontLie #NCVSVictimData #EndTheSilence #LawAndOrderNow #CrimeByTheNumbers #WakeUpAmerica
0:59

🚨 MOSTLY PEACEFUL PHONE HEIST: Black 'Youth' Savagely Beats Defenseless White Woman for Her Cellphone – FBI + NCVS Data Expose the Ignored Epidemic: BLACK ON WHITE & BLACK ON BLACK VIOLENCE! 🔥 Surveillance footage doesn’t lie. Watch a young Black male storm a cellphone store and unleash a ferocious, unprovoked assault on an older White woman — dragging her down, pummeling her on the floor, stomping her while she’s helpless, then snatching her phone and bolting. “Procuring himself a new cellphone,” in the bitterly ironic words of one poster. One of the most sickening things you’ll see this week. Prayers for this poor woman. This isn’t random chaos. It’s a microcosm of a macro pattern criminologists have documented for decades, but polite society refuses to name. FBI Uniform Crime Reports (latest detailed tables) show African Americans — 13% of the U.S. population — account for 51–55% of murder offenders and ~33% of all violent crime arrests. Expanded Homicide Data: Black-on-White murders outnumber White-on-Black by more than 2-to-1 (566 vs. 246 in the 2019 snapshot; the ratio holds across years). The gold-standard National Crime Victimization Survey (BJS/NCVS), which bypasses police “bias” by asking victims directly who attacked them, confirms the same asymmetry: Black offenders commit the overwhelming majority of interracial violent crimes against Whites — robberies and assaults at rates 8–15 times higher per capita than the reverse. Intra-racial crime dominates overall, as it does in every group. But when violence crosses racial lines, the skew is not even close to symmetric. That is empirical reality, not narrative. Elites lecture endlessly about “systemic” this and “disparate impact” that — yet the data show the real disparate impact lands hardest on innocent victims of all races when we pretend group behavioral patterns don’t exist. We don’t solve problems by lying about them. We don’t have to live like this. Demand color-blind justice, relentless policing of violent predators, and cultural honesty that refuses excuses. The woman on the floor deserved better. So does every American tired of the euphemisms. Face the data. Enforce the law. Protect the vulnerable. #BlackOnWhiteCrimeReality #FBIStatsDontLie #NCVSVictimData #EndTheSilence #LawAndOrderNow #CrimeByTheNumbers #WakeUpAmerica

Tony Seruga

45,733 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Just tried Seedance 2.5 on Pollo AI and pushed it into a 30-second cinematic sequence. 🎬 Loved how smooth the motion and camera work can feel when the scene is properly directed. Seedance 2.5 is currently 50% OFF on Pollo AI for a limited time. Prompt; 30-sec cinematic London grappling sequence. Ultra-photorealistic live-action Hollywood cinematography, realistic physics, natural lighting, detailed London environments, cinematic depth of field, 35mm/50mm look, 4K. A beautiful young adult White American woman, mid-20s, long blonde hair, athletic build, natural face. She is an ordinary woman using experimental wrist-mounted grappling devices, not a superhero. No mask, cape, emblem or superhero costume. She wears the same fitted black athletic crop top with subtle piping, black high-waisted athletic shorts, white sneakers and minimal jewelry throughout. Camera: One continuous third-person tracking shot. Camera always remains outside her, never first-person, handheld or smartphone. Keep her clearly visible and maintain smooth physically motivated movement. No cuts or perspective changes. 0:00–0:05: Golden-hour London apartment overlooking the skyline. She sits safely on the balcony ledge, looks toward camera and says, “Okay… let’s see if this works.” Camera slowly moves toward her. 0:05–0:09: She steps over the railing and descends naturally. Camera follows backward in a wide full-body shot. 0:09–0:13: Her right wrist device activates with a subtle orange light. Cable shoots to a believable rooftop anchor, visibly attaches and becomes taut, converting her fall into a realistic swing. 0:13–0:18: Camera tracks beside her as she swings between buildings. River Thames and London skyline below, with buses, black cabs and traffic. She releases the cable and activates her left wrist. 0:18–0:22: Second cable attaches to a rooftop. She swings again as the camera smoothly arcs around her while keeping her full body visible. 0:22–0:26: She lands naturally on a rooftop, runs three steps, reaches the edge, pauses briefly, then leaps toward the next building. 0:26–0:30: She fires a final cable and makes a huge smooth swing above London. Camera pulls backward and upward, revealing Tower Bridge, London Eye, The Shard, Westminster, Thames and the city at sunset. She releases and briefly glides forward before becoming a small silhouette. Fade to black. Maintain exact character, outfit, devices and environment continuity. Realistic gravity, momentum, cable tension, wind, hair and clothing physics. No teleportation, impossible movement, distorted hands, duplicated limbs, warped buildings, disappearing cables, changing clothes, excessive VFX or background morphing. Keep it subtle.
0:30

Just tried Seedance 2.5 on Pollo AI and pushed it into a 30-second cinematic sequence. 🎬 Loved how smooth the motion and camera work can feel when the scene is properly directed. Seedance 2.5 is currently 50% OFF on Pollo AI for a limited time. Prompt; 30-sec cinematic London grappling sequence. Ultra-photorealistic live-action Hollywood cinematography, realistic physics, natural lighting, detailed London environments, cinematic depth of field, 35mm/50mm look, 4K. A beautiful young adult White American woman, mid-20s, long blonde hair, athletic build, natural face. She is an ordinary woman using experimental wrist-mounted grappling devices, not a superhero. No mask, cape, emblem or superhero costume. She wears the same fitted black athletic crop top with subtle piping, black high-waisted athletic shorts, white sneakers and minimal jewelry throughout. Camera: One continuous third-person tracking shot. Camera always remains outside her, never first-person, handheld or smartphone. Keep her clearly visible and maintain smooth physically motivated movement. No cuts or perspective changes. 0:00–0:05: Golden-hour London apartment overlooking the skyline. She sits safely on the balcony ledge, looks toward camera and says, “Okay… let’s see if this works.” Camera slowly moves toward her. 0:05–0:09: She steps over the railing and descends naturally. Camera follows backward in a wide full-body shot. 0:09–0:13: Her right wrist device activates with a subtle orange light. Cable shoots to a believable rooftop anchor, visibly attaches and becomes taut, converting her fall into a realistic swing. 0:13–0:18: Camera tracks beside her as she swings between buildings. River Thames and London skyline below, with buses, black cabs and traffic. She releases the cable and activates her left wrist. 0:18–0:22: Second cable attaches to a rooftop. She swings again as the camera smoothly arcs around her while keeping her full body visible. 0:22–0:26: She lands naturally on a rooftop, runs three steps, reaches the edge, pauses briefly, then leaps toward the next building. 0:26–0:30: She fires a final cable and makes a huge smooth swing above London. Camera pulls backward and upward, revealing Tower Bridge, London Eye, The Shard, Westminster, Thames and the city at sunset. She releases and briefly glides forward before becoming a small silhouette. Fade to black. Maintain exact character, outfit, devices and environment continuity. Realistic gravity, momentum, cable tension, wind, hair and clothing physics. No teleportation, impossible movement, distorted hands, duplicated limbs, warped buildings, disappearing cables, changing clothes, excessive VFX or background morphing. Keep it subtle.

Jack

18,519 просмотров • 11 дней назад

🚨HOW DASTARDLY: The MASK is completely OFF at Turning Point USA Faith — and it’s UGLIER than anyone IMAGINED. A young conservative woman attends a TPUSA Faith event expecting biblical truth and unity. Instead she witnesses pastors on stage obsessing over Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson, spewing division and political propaganda from the pulpit. She makes a calm, heartfelt video about her disappointing experience. It goes viral. Candace reposts it. What happens next exposes everything: 1⃣Pastor John “Manchuku” publicly calls her a “leftist troll” who was “acting” for the camera. 2⃣TPUSA Faith Senior Director Lucas Miles slides into her DMs with a private pressure campaign — not to address her actual criticism, but to guilt-trip her into publicly supporting Philadelphia Hebrew Israelite camps… because “it brings people to faith.” (Translation: Disagree with the approved narrative and you’re not just wrong — you’re an enemy of the Gospel itself.) This is textbook Operation Mocking Pastor, exactly as Candace called it. They weaponize scripture as a shield while launching personal attacks, then hide behind “8,000 pastors all agree with us” when challenged. Show me one. Just one who sounds like pre-silence Charlie Kirk or present-day Candace or Tucker. I’ll wait. The smears aren’t working. The good-cop/bad-cop routine isn’t working. The staged sermons disguised as spiritual rebuke are backfiring spectacularly. Charlie was the engine holding it all together. Without him, the cracks are canyons. Young conservatives are waking up in real time: Blind loyalty to any organization — even one wearing a cross — is not the same as loyalty to Christ or country. The era of untouchable conservative gatekeepers is over. The kids see it. The receipts are public. And the meltdown only proves the point. Keep speaking, brothers and sisters. They’re terrified of your voice for a reason. Please FOLLOW my bro Coach Colin and also go watch his FULL Video he just dropped, It's straight 🔥. I'll drop the link to the full video in the comments.
10:18

🚨HOW DASTARDLY: The MASK is completely OFF at Turning Point USA Faith — and it’s UGLIER than anyone IMAGINED. A young conservative woman attends a TPUSA Faith event expecting biblical truth and unity. Instead she witnesses pastors on stage obsessing over Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson, spewing division and political propaganda from the pulpit. She makes a calm, heartfelt video about her disappointing experience. It goes viral. Candace reposts it. What happens next exposes everything: 1⃣Pastor John “Manchuku” publicly calls her a “leftist troll” who was “acting” for the camera. 2⃣TPUSA Faith Senior Director Lucas Miles slides into her DMs with a private pressure campaign — not to address her actual criticism, but to guilt-trip her into publicly supporting Philadelphia Hebrew Israelite camps… because “it brings people to faith.” (Translation: Disagree with the approved narrative and you’re not just wrong — you’re an enemy of the Gospel itself.) This is textbook Operation Mocking Pastor, exactly as Candace called it. They weaponize scripture as a shield while launching personal attacks, then hide behind “8,000 pastors all agree with us” when challenged. Show me one. Just one who sounds like pre-silence Charlie Kirk or present-day Candace or Tucker. I’ll wait. The smears aren’t working. The good-cop/bad-cop routine isn’t working. The staged sermons disguised as spiritual rebuke are backfiring spectacularly. Charlie was the engine holding it all together. Without him, the cracks are canyons. Young conservatives are waking up in real time: Blind loyalty to any organization — even one wearing a cross — is not the same as loyalty to Christ or country. The era of untouchable conservative gatekeepers is over. The kids see it. The receipts are public. And the meltdown only proves the point. Keep speaking, brothers and sisters. They’re terrified of your voice for a reason. Please FOLLOW my bro Coach Colin and also go watch his FULL Video he just dropped, It's straight 🔥. I'll drop the link to the full video in the comments.

Project Constitution

43,899 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

‼️ Dear South African Courts & Co. How much does it actually cost per page for black & white copies requested at court? Yesterday at White River Magistrate’s Court, I requested copies needed for trial prep. After a lengthy back-and-forth with the Court Manager, who has previously refused me access to documents I’m Constitutionally entitled to, I was finally assisted by a Clerk of the Court, but only after reminding them of my rights, asking them if they needed me to contact our attorney, and sending about 10 emails. The total? R456. I suspect a stack of bank notes for that amount would be taller than the copies themselves. But okay. I asked to pay by card (it was way more than expected), but no, cash only for this. I called my husband to withdraw cash and bring it to me at court. Paid. Asked for a receipt? “No, we don’t have it.” “Come get it tomorrow.” Today I returned to collect that receipt for these “rare” overpriced sheets of paper. The same woman at the cash desk looked at me in utter bewilderment, as if I had no right to ask. She carried on packing books into a cupboard while I waited at the window, I tried to get her attention: “Excuse me, mam, my receipt please.” Suddenly, two SA Police Service 🇿🇦 officers appeared behind me to escort me out, for the “crime” of wanting my receipt. I explained I’m entitled to proof of payment for the R456 handed over yesterday. So they ushered me into the Court Manager’s office. One thing is crystal clear: when dealing with this corrupt system, you MUST film everything (I wish I had a body cam). Situations can turn absurdly dangerous in seconds, even a magistrate might attack you with a brick right at court, as actually happened to my husband. Filming creates undeniable evidence for personal protection. The rot in South Africa runs all the way down to tiny courts like White River. I eventually got my receipt. Now please, tell me, for R456, how many pages did I receive? NPASouthAfrica RSAJudiciary The DoJ & CD Public Protector South Africa Corruption Watch Lawyers for Human Rights Judges Matter #WhiteRiverCourt #CourtCorruption #AccessToJustice #JudicialAccountability
0:30

‼️ Dear South African Courts & Co. How much does it actually cost per page for black & white copies requested at court? Yesterday at White River Magistrate’s Court, I requested copies needed for trial prep. After a lengthy back-and-forth with the Court Manager, who has previously refused me access to documents I’m Constitutionally entitled to, I was finally assisted by a Clerk of the Court, but only after reminding them of my rights, asking them if they needed me to contact our attorney, and sending about 10 emails. The total? R456. I suspect a stack of bank notes for that amount would be taller than the copies themselves. But okay. I asked to pay by card (it was way more than expected), but no, cash only for this. I called my husband to withdraw cash and bring it to me at court. Paid. Asked for a receipt? “No, we don’t have it.” “Come get it tomorrow.” Today I returned to collect that receipt for these “rare” overpriced sheets of paper. The same woman at the cash desk looked at me in utter bewilderment, as if I had no right to ask. She carried on packing books into a cupboard while I waited at the window, I tried to get her attention: “Excuse me, mam, my receipt please.” Suddenly, two SA Police Service 🇿🇦 officers appeared behind me to escort me out, for the “crime” of wanting my receipt. I explained I’m entitled to proof of payment for the R456 handed over yesterday. So they ushered me into the Court Manager’s office. One thing is crystal clear: when dealing with this corrupt system, you MUST film everything (I wish I had a body cam). Situations can turn absurdly dangerous in seconds, even a magistrate might attack you with a brick right at court, as actually happened to my husband. Filming creates undeniable evidence for personal protection. The rot in South Africa runs all the way down to tiny courts like White River. I eventually got my receipt. Now please, tell me, for R456, how many pages did I receive? NPASouthAfrica RSAJudiciary The DoJ & CD Public Protector South Africa Corruption Watch Lawyers for Human Rights Judges Matter #WhiteRiverCourt #CourtCorruption #AccessToJustice #JudicialAccountability

Delia Byliefeldt

132,741 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Dumbing Down II "By Faith, this is the last rent I am paying as a single lady. If you support me to pay this rent, by the grace of God, this time next year, I will be in my husband's house." is back begging for support to pay another rent. Not because God didn't bring eligible suitors her way, but because her PASTOR has replaced the Holy Spirit in her life. Pastors ruin a lot of destinies when they insist on playing God instead of their primary role as destiny guides. Many members have submitted their free will to their pastors, giving their pastors the power that God himself didn't take from us from the dawn of creation. When you take the ability of the individual to act as a free agent in the name of religion, you reduce him or her to a puppet and yourself to a puppeteer. You want to pull the strings of the lives of thousands of born-again Christians at the same time while rendering them useless to follow their paths in Christ and grow into mature sons. I was at a Church in Anthony village about three years ago to minister, and I met this young man who was schooled at a very prestigious university in the USA. He was the in-house IT consultant of the church, and the pastor placed him on a monthly stipend while he was working for God. It was the Pastor who introduced the young man to me while boasting that God had given him the most capable hands to help him in ministry. I asked him if he had any Python, Java, cloud engineering, data management, digital marketing, coding, or similar tasks available for the young man in the church. He said no. I said, "You are giving this young man the job that any young school leaver who is proficient in computer appreciation can do, and you don't see it as limiting his capabilities and rendering his skills obsolete?" You would rather boast that you are ruining a destiny to build up your own profile rather than set this young man on the path of excellence? Did God call him into ministry as a preacher? Is he understudying you in preparation for his own ministry? The pastor said, "No, I plan that as the church expands, he will head our digital infrastructure and position us for the future." I said, "He can do that as a consultant or even as a member, he shouldn't be doing that while you are paying him 100,000 Naira a month. He should be out there, flying with his peers and earning in dollars! The only exception is if the Lord has called him to be a preacher and he is understudying you as your personal assistant, as led by the Lord as part of his season of preparation. Anything other than that is injurious to his destiny!" The pastor had never seen it that way When I was done ministering in the church, the young man hugged me and thanked me profusely. He said his mother sent him to the pastor when he returned from the USA and the pastor immediately told him that God had need of him in the ministry or he would die without fulfilling his purpose. Why do pastors do this? I have another case from the Northern part of Nigeria. A young lady reached out to me seeking clarity regarding her future She said her Apostle told her she has been raised by God to sing in his church choir, but she is a medical doctor by training and desires to further her studies abroad Every time she raised the issue with the Apostle, he shut her down and told her she was struggling with the will of God "Why can't you just submit to God and serve in the choir and watch as God will take your voice all over the world as this ministry grows?" The young lady said she knows she has a good voice and sings very well as one who is full of the Holy Spirit, but she does not want to be "Sinach", she wants to fulfil her dream of practising as a Pediatrician. She was wary of incurring the wrath and curse of the Apostle, however, and did not know how to extricate herself from the situation. The apostle did not see anything wrong with his actions because he was a user of people who believed that in order to fulfill his own desire to become a big ministry, others could not thrive and grow in their visions and ministries as ordained by God. This is witchcraft. It is not of God. Jesus didn't lead his disciples this way. Insecurity is the undoing of many African so-called Pastors and Spiritual leaders, and they hide behind the illusion of divinity to put others in bondage. I experienced this firsthand as a young graduate, so I understand how a pastor trying to build his ministry could see the potential in a young man or woman and try very hard to turn such a person into servants and house helps in the name of discipling them or training them for kingdom relevance You graduate from the University and join the labour force, you apply for many jobs, and at a point, you tell yourself it is important to seek supernatural guidance in your quest to fulfil destiny Somebody somewhere tells you about a church or a ministry, you join, and you are convinced the church is good. You also tell your friends, and they join. But you are all fresh graduates who are heading into the future one way or the other, but this pastor wants you to be his flock. To him, his church of ten members had suddenly become a church of 30 members because of you guys, and he wants to keep the numbers growing, so he begins to give you prophesies that were not of God but with the aim of keeping you in the fold for as long as possible. He told young graduates who ought to go for NYSC that God is telling him they should give it up for service to God in the vineyard. The mother of two of the ladies in the fellowship, whose daughters told that the pastor told them not to go for NYSC, quickly removed them from the fellowship before the seed of corruption being planted by this pastor would bear fruit The others also left as soon as they could gather their wit People who you ought to guide on their path in sincerity ran as far as they could from you based on how you chose to manipulate rather than nurture them. A married woman whose husband worked abroad was a trained secretary, and while her husband was abroad, catering to the needs of the family, he begged her to stop working so that she could focus on raising the children. She was raising five children all by herself, and combining this with a job seemed a bit too much at the time. One of the vital institutions for raising godly children was the church This woman attended church regularly with her children and even volunteered to spend any free time she had typing the pastor's sermons, Sunday School pamphlets, handouts, books, journals, and other church reports and documents She was not officially employed to do the work; she just saw that she could take some of the secretarial duties on during her downtime, and she did so with all sincerity. The church enjoyed her free services for five years until the pastor forgot completely that she was doing the church a favour One day, the woman came to church to tell the pastor that her husband would be returning home to visit the family, and she would not be available for a few days because she had to pick her husband up from the airport and ensure that he settled in properly. Unfortunately, that weekend was the weekend of the church's anniversary, and the pastor had a lot of secretarial work to do. He told the woman God said she should pick one. Heaven or marriage. He said if she goes to pick her husband from the airport, she has chosen the world and forsaken the Lord. The woman wept all the way home, It was not the thank you, thou faithful servant report she had worked day and night for many years to get that she received. She went to pick her husband from the airport and distanced herself from any church founded by any individual after that experience. She said the ambition of church founders requires that they use people to build, even though they lacked the resources to pay or compensate such people, so they resort to blackmail, coercion, lies, fake prophesies, promises, and manipulations to get things done while keeping their followers on a leash. Followers are also enablers as they refuse to read the Bible for themselves and walk in the light of the word of God. No one should be able to take you captive in the name of God, Jesus, all the angels, or any form of miracle if you know the word of God. The word of God is profitable to make one wise, and therefore, anyone who knows the word of God cannot fall victim to any false doctrine, teaching, spiritual manipulations, or lies. All the false teachings of someone being a covering for someone else came from these manipulative narratives, and believers should be wise to them. I have seen a pastor declare that his church is the only church in Africa that is licensed by God to take people to heaven, and some members believed him. The day he said that, all his members ought to laugh, pick up their Bibles, and leave without looking back. Self-aggrandisement has become the order of the day in some churches, the pastor sells himself as the be-all and end-all of the member's spiritual enlightenment, and the members sheepishly surrender their eyes of their understanding to him or her. He or she must determine where they work, whom they marry, who they associate with, whose music they must listen to, and whose sermons they must hear. If they want to travel, he must see if the road is clear on their behalf, if they want to build a house, he must approve, if he does not dedicate their baby, the baby is illegitimate. This is not the faith Christ or the Apostles died for. Jesus died that you might be free of religion. Christianity is not a religion, it is the opposite. It is individualistic and determined by the faith and belief system of the one rather than the many. Salvation, therefore, is a personal affair, and the baptism of the Holy Spirit is also a personal affair Religion is the opium of the masses, and Christianity is the salvation of the individual and his or her walk with God. When we fellowship together, we do so not so we can get brainwashed by one "super Christian" but so that we can minister to the Lord and minister to one another in the presence of God. Every believer must hold this truth to be self-evident. PS: Someone sent me the video of a pastor condemning a song recently released by a fellow believer, which is making a global impact The Pastor represents an old school of Christians who are unfit to be custodians of the gospel due to their rigidity and limited understanding of the finished work of Christ. Disciples of the gospel of Works and Performance lack creativity and discernment but are good stewards of rigidity and religious doctrines. In other words, a Pharisee must act like one, and Jesus must act like Jesus. We are all just being true to our nature. "I can never go back o No...No It's already too late o No...No Where Am I going to... No...No" If you read to this point, when I was in Spain, I asked a very important question about a meal. If you know the answer, I'm inside the comment section. -GSW-
0:38

Dumbing Down II "By Faith, this is the last rent I am paying as a single lady. If you support me to pay this rent, by the grace of God, this time next year, I will be in my husband's house." is back begging for support to pay another rent. Not because God didn't bring eligible suitors her way, but because her PASTOR has replaced the Holy Spirit in her life. Pastors ruin a lot of destinies when they insist on playing God instead of their primary role as destiny guides. Many members have submitted their free will to their pastors, giving their pastors the power that God himself didn't take from us from the dawn of creation. When you take the ability of the individual to act as a free agent in the name of religion, you reduce him or her to a puppet and yourself to a puppeteer. You want to pull the strings of the lives of thousands of born-again Christians at the same time while rendering them useless to follow their paths in Christ and grow into mature sons. I was at a Church in Anthony village about three years ago to minister, and I met this young man who was schooled at a very prestigious university in the USA. He was the in-house IT consultant of the church, and the pastor placed him on a monthly stipend while he was working for God. It was the Pastor who introduced the young man to me while boasting that God had given him the most capable hands to help him in ministry. I asked him if he had any Python, Java, cloud engineering, data management, digital marketing, coding, or similar tasks available for the young man in the church. He said no. I said, "You are giving this young man the job that any young school leaver who is proficient in computer appreciation can do, and you don't see it as limiting his capabilities and rendering his skills obsolete?" You would rather boast that you are ruining a destiny to build up your own profile rather than set this young man on the path of excellence? Did God call him into ministry as a preacher? Is he understudying you in preparation for his own ministry? The pastor said, "No, I plan that as the church expands, he will head our digital infrastructure and position us for the future." I said, "He can do that as a consultant or even as a member, he shouldn't be doing that while you are paying him 100,000 Naira a month. He should be out there, flying with his peers and earning in dollars! The only exception is if the Lord has called him to be a preacher and he is understudying you as your personal assistant, as led by the Lord as part of his season of preparation. Anything other than that is injurious to his destiny!" The pastor had never seen it that way When I was done ministering in the church, the young man hugged me and thanked me profusely. He said his mother sent him to the pastor when he returned from the USA and the pastor immediately told him that God had need of him in the ministry or he would die without fulfilling his purpose. Why do pastors do this? I have another case from the Northern part of Nigeria. A young lady reached out to me seeking clarity regarding her future She said her Apostle told her she has been raised by God to sing in his church choir, but she is a medical doctor by training and desires to further her studies abroad Every time she raised the issue with the Apostle, he shut her down and told her she was struggling with the will of God "Why can't you just submit to God and serve in the choir and watch as God will take your voice all over the world as this ministry grows?" The young lady said she knows she has a good voice and sings very well as one who is full of the Holy Spirit, but she does not want to be "Sinach", she wants to fulfil her dream of practising as a Pediatrician. She was wary of incurring the wrath and curse of the Apostle, however, and did not know how to extricate herself from the situation. The apostle did not see anything wrong with his actions because he was a user of people who believed that in order to fulfill his own desire to become a big ministry, others could not thrive and grow in their visions and ministries as ordained by God. This is witchcraft. It is not of God. Jesus didn't lead his disciples this way. Insecurity is the undoing of many African so-called Pastors and Spiritual leaders, and they hide behind the illusion of divinity to put others in bondage. I experienced this firsthand as a young graduate, so I understand how a pastor trying to build his ministry could see the potential in a young man or woman and try very hard to turn such a person into servants and house helps in the name of discipling them or training them for kingdom relevance You graduate from the University and join the labour force, you apply for many jobs, and at a point, you tell yourself it is important to seek supernatural guidance in your quest to fulfil destiny Somebody somewhere tells you about a church or a ministry, you join, and you are convinced the church is good. You also tell your friends, and they join. But you are all fresh graduates who are heading into the future one way or the other, but this pastor wants you to be his flock. To him, his church of ten members had suddenly become a church of 30 members because of you guys, and he wants to keep the numbers growing, so he begins to give you prophesies that were not of God but with the aim of keeping you in the fold for as long as possible. He told young graduates who ought to go for NYSC that God is telling him they should give it up for service to God in the vineyard. The mother of two of the ladies in the fellowship, whose daughters told that the pastor told them not to go for NYSC, quickly removed them from the fellowship before the seed of corruption being planted by this pastor would bear fruit The others also left as soon as they could gather their wit People who you ought to guide on their path in sincerity ran as far as they could from you based on how you chose to manipulate rather than nurture them. A married woman whose husband worked abroad was a trained secretary, and while her husband was abroad, catering to the needs of the family, he begged her to stop working so that she could focus on raising the children. She was raising five children all by herself, and combining this with a job seemed a bit too much at the time. One of the vital institutions for raising godly children was the church This woman attended church regularly with her children and even volunteered to spend any free time she had typing the pastor's sermons, Sunday School pamphlets, handouts, books, journals, and other church reports and documents She was not officially employed to do the work; she just saw that she could take some of the secretarial duties on during her downtime, and she did so with all sincerity. The church enjoyed her free services for five years until the pastor forgot completely that she was doing the church a favour One day, the woman came to church to tell the pastor that her husband would be returning home to visit the family, and she would not be available for a few days because she had to pick her husband up from the airport and ensure that he settled in properly. Unfortunately, that weekend was the weekend of the church's anniversary, and the pastor had a lot of secretarial work to do. He told the woman God said she should pick one. Heaven or marriage. He said if she goes to pick her husband from the airport, she has chosen the world and forsaken the Lord. The woman wept all the way home, It was not the thank you, thou faithful servant report she had worked day and night for many years to get that she received. She went to pick her husband from the airport and distanced herself from any church founded by any individual after that experience. She said the ambition of church founders requires that they use people to build, even though they lacked the resources to pay or compensate such people, so they resort to blackmail, coercion, lies, fake prophesies, promises, and manipulations to get things done while keeping their followers on a leash. Followers are also enablers as they refuse to read the Bible for themselves and walk in the light of the word of God. No one should be able to take you captive in the name of God, Jesus, all the angels, or any form of miracle if you know the word of God. The word of God is profitable to make one wise, and therefore, anyone who knows the word of God cannot fall victim to any false doctrine, teaching, spiritual manipulations, or lies. All the false teachings of someone being a covering for someone else came from these manipulative narratives, and believers should be wise to them. I have seen a pastor declare that his church is the only church in Africa that is licensed by God to take people to heaven, and some members believed him. The day he said that, all his members ought to laugh, pick up their Bibles, and leave without looking back. Self-aggrandisement has become the order of the day in some churches, the pastor sells himself as the be-all and end-all of the member's spiritual enlightenment, and the members sheepishly surrender their eyes of their understanding to him or her. He or she must determine where they work, whom they marry, who they associate with, whose music they must listen to, and whose sermons they must hear. If they want to travel, he must see if the road is clear on their behalf, if they want to build a house, he must approve, if he does not dedicate their baby, the baby is illegitimate. This is not the faith Christ or the Apostles died for. Jesus died that you might be free of religion. Christianity is not a religion, it is the opposite. It is individualistic and determined by the faith and belief system of the one rather than the many. Salvation, therefore, is a personal affair, and the baptism of the Holy Spirit is also a personal affair Religion is the opium of the masses, and Christianity is the salvation of the individual and his or her walk with God. When we fellowship together, we do so not so we can get brainwashed by one "super Christian" but so that we can minister to the Lord and minister to one another in the presence of God. Every believer must hold this truth to be self-evident. PS: Someone sent me the video of a pastor condemning a song recently released by a fellow believer, which is making a global impact The Pastor represents an old school of Christians who are unfit to be custodians of the gospel due to their rigidity and limited understanding of the finished work of Christ. Disciples of the gospel of Works and Performance lack creativity and discernment but are good stewards of rigidity and religious doctrines. In other words, a Pharisee must act like one, and Jesus must act like Jesus. We are all just being true to our nature. "I can never go back o No...No It's already too late o No...No Where Am I going to... No...No" If you read to this point, when I was in Spain, I asked a very important question about a meal. If you know the answer, I'm inside the comment section. -GSW-

Gbenga Samuel-Wemimo

28,623 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨🚨🚨 Such an important story! Jan 21, 2024, Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson (Sharyl Attkisson 🕵️‍♂️💼🥋), Don't forget Pfizer and the FDA tried to bury adverse events! Please watch, forward, email etc. Highlights------------------- Case 1 It's the story of Maddie, one of the children who took part in Pfizer's vaccine study on children. It's a remarkable account of what happened when Maddie got very, very sick, leading to accusations that Pfizer, the FDA and the study leaders tried to bury her case. In summer of 2020, Stephanie De Garay and her family learned an important clinical trial was about to be launched at nearby Cincinnati Children's Hospital. It would test Pfizer's experimental Covid-19 vaccine on 12 to 15 year olds to see if it was safe and effective. The De Garay's firmly pro-vaccine, didn't hesitate to let their children take part. Among three siblings, twelve year old Maddie alone was chosen to get two doses of Pfizer's vaccine, rather than a harmless placebo, it proved a fateful and debilitating roll of the dice. Her second dose was January 20 of 2021. So by the time she came home from school my husband called me at work and said, Maddie's having some sort of reaction. She had what she described as electrical shocks going up and down her spine. she said she felt like her heart was being ripped out. So chest pain, she had severe abdominal pain. She was hunched over when she walked through the door. Her toes and her fingers were white and they were like, when you touched them, they were ice cold and painful. Did you think right away that this was probably a vaccine reaction? "100%." De Garay says she was shocked when the lead study doctor offered no help. "I trusted the government. I trusted doctors. I trusted hospitals.... What I thought they were is not what they are." Case 2 Carrie Peterson Edberg's son Milo got the shot in December of 2021 and ended up with a serious heart problem that's associated with COVID vaccines. He got vaccinated on, like, a Friday. And on Sunday, he actually. Sunday morning at 01:00 a.m. Was on life support. He was diagnosed with myocarditis. doctors, of course, would not say it was vaccine-injured, but why would a six year old have myocarditis? Case 3 Daniel Hartman's 17 year old son was rushed to the hospital four days after his shot in September of 2021. My son Sean played hockey his whole life. To continue to play hockey, he had to get a vaccine. He took one Pfizer shot and died 33 days later. Answers4Sean 🇨🇦 Case 4 And 16 year old Ernesto, son of single parent Ernest Ramirez, dropped dead of an enlarged heart five days after his Pfizer Covid shot. When I got there, they were loading him up in the ambulance. I changed the ambulance to the hospital. When I got there, they were working on him at the hospital. There was a young doctor. He came out, he was. Your son's dead. You can go home. Ernest Ramirez ---------------------------------- Pfizer Cincinnati Children's Hospital and lead study scientist Dr. Robert Frenck declined comment and wouldn't answer our questions. Same with CDC, which also wouldn't tell us how many adverse event reports in children it's received for Covid vaccines. We asked federal health officials if they agree with Pfizer's published claim that, quote, there were no vaccine related serious adverse events in their study on children. But they declined to answer the question.
9:45

🚨🚨🚨 Such an important story! Jan 21, 2024, Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson (Sharyl Attkisson 🕵️‍♂️💼🥋), Don't forget Pfizer and the FDA tried to bury adverse events! Please watch, forward, email etc. Highlights------------------- Case 1 It's the story of Maddie, one of the children who took part in Pfizer's vaccine study on children. It's a remarkable account of what happened when Maddie got very, very sick, leading to accusations that Pfizer, the FDA and the study leaders tried to bury her case. In summer of 2020, Stephanie De Garay and her family learned an important clinical trial was about to be launched at nearby Cincinnati Children's Hospital. It would test Pfizer's experimental Covid-19 vaccine on 12 to 15 year olds to see if it was safe and effective. The De Garay's firmly pro-vaccine, didn't hesitate to let their children take part. Among three siblings, twelve year old Maddie alone was chosen to get two doses of Pfizer's vaccine, rather than a harmless placebo, it proved a fateful and debilitating roll of the dice. Her second dose was January 20 of 2021. So by the time she came home from school my husband called me at work and said, Maddie's having some sort of reaction. She had what she described as electrical shocks going up and down her spine. she said she felt like her heart was being ripped out. So chest pain, she had severe abdominal pain. She was hunched over when she walked through the door. Her toes and her fingers were white and they were like, when you touched them, they were ice cold and painful. Did you think right away that this was probably a vaccine reaction? "100%." De Garay says she was shocked when the lead study doctor offered no help. "I trusted the government. I trusted doctors. I trusted hospitals.... What I thought they were is not what they are." Case 2 Carrie Peterson Edberg's son Milo got the shot in December of 2021 and ended up with a serious heart problem that's associated with COVID vaccines. He got vaccinated on, like, a Friday. And on Sunday, he actually. Sunday morning at 01:00 a.m. Was on life support. He was diagnosed with myocarditis. doctors, of course, would not say it was vaccine-injured, but why would a six year old have myocarditis? Case 3 Daniel Hartman's 17 year old son was rushed to the hospital four days after his shot in September of 2021. My son Sean played hockey his whole life. To continue to play hockey, he had to get a vaccine. He took one Pfizer shot and died 33 days later. Answers4Sean 🇨🇦 Case 4 And 16 year old Ernesto, son of single parent Ernest Ramirez, dropped dead of an enlarged heart five days after his Pfizer Covid shot. When I got there, they were loading him up in the ambulance. I changed the ambulance to the hospital. When I got there, they were working on him at the hospital. There was a young doctor. He came out, he was. Your son's dead. You can go home. Ernest Ramirez ---------------------------------- Pfizer Cincinnati Children's Hospital and lead study scientist Dr. Robert Frenck declined comment and wouldn't answer our questions. Same with CDC, which also wouldn't tell us how many adverse event reports in children it's received for Covid vaccines. We asked federal health officials if they agree with Pfizer's published claim that, quote, there were no vaccine related serious adverse events in their study on children. But they declined to answer the question.

aussie17

71,777 просмотров • 2 лет назад

⚠️ TW // MIGHT BE OVERDO SPOILER ⚠️ ⛔️ DO NOT read this tweet if you haven’t watched the actual ending yet, or, you don’t want the ending you want in your head right now to get ruined ⛔️ I already put the warning, so read at your own risk~ Overdo actual ending in original script (that I got). Reason why it didn’t get included in long episode.. probably because they don’t have enough time to shoot it, as we know the filming cycle for is only 90 days. Enjoy reading! ☺️ [33-10] The flames consume the Dongjiadu Waterworks. Smoke billows into the sky as beams collapse one after another. A rescue worker shouts over the roar of the fire. “There is someone!” It is Murong Qingyi. His whole body covered in blood. His breathing is shallow. “Young Master?” “You know him?” The middle aged man nods slowly, disbelief written across his face. “I used to work for Commander Li.” As they carry him away, Qingyi’s fingers twitch. “Susu...” [33-11] 3 Months later. Qingyi slowly regains consciousness in a small clinic. He instinctively tries to sit up. Pain tears through his body, forcing him back onto the bed. The physician quickly stops him. “Don’t move.” Qingyi look at him. “Who helps me? I have to go back.” “Someone who knows you said you need to recover first before you go.” “My wife is waiting for me” “You’ve been unconscious for 3 months. Your burns are severe, several ribs are fractured, and your lungs are injured from smoke inhalation. You won’t even make it out the front door.” Qingyi grips the edge of the bed. — Over the following months, Qingyi travels from one city to another. Everywhere he goes, he seeks renowned physicians and specialists for burns and internal injuries. One elderly doctor examines the scars on his back before shaking his head. ”You pushed your body too far. If you continue traveling before you’ve healed completely, these injuries will stay with you for life.” [33-12] Two years later. A physician smiles as he finishes removing the last bandage from Qingyi’s body. [33-13] Two years later. The rebuilt lakeside cabin in Shencheng looks much the same as it once did. [Montage] Haitang Qing’s voice is heard reading from her letter. “The Fang Trading Company has found its footing again. Our business in Nanyang is flourishing, and so many of our partners are eager to meet the mysterious boss behind it all. The new plane you donated to the aviation academy has already begun training a promising new generation of pilots. The girls’ school we founded has welcomed its very first class of students. The opening ceremony won’t be complete without its chairwoman. Susu... all of us miss you. How much longer are you going to wait for him? He’s not coming back.” The letter continues as glimpses of Susu’s life play out. Le-an sits at his desk practicing calligraphy while Susu patiently guides him, correcting each stroke with gentle encouragement. Later, she tends to the flowers blooming throughout the garden, carefully watering each one. She pushes Le-an on a swing beneath the warm afternoon sun, mother and son laughing together. That night, she reads him a bedtime story. When his breathing evens into sleep, she smiles softly, tucks the blanket around him, and quietly slips from the room. [Montage END] Spring has arrived. Outside the cabin, the lake shimmers beneath the sunlight. Beneath a flowering tree, a picnic blanket has been spread across the grass. Susu sits beneath the blossoms, finishing Haitang Qing’s letter. The warmth of the afternoon makes her drowsy. She places the letter aside, lies down on her side atop the blanket, and slowly drifts into a light sleep. Everything is quiet. Sunlight filters gently through the branches overhead, petals swaying with the breeze. Then a soft gust brushes past. Half asleep, Susu feels someone settle beside her. She lazily opens her eyes. Only inches away is a familiar face. A handsome man dressed in a white shirt lies beside her, his head resting against one hand as he quietly watches her. She simply closes her eyes again. Dreaming of him has become so familiar that it no longer surprises her. A small smile finds its way onto her lips. “This is strange...” she murmurs sleepily. “Why have I been dreaming about you so often lately?” Murong Qingyi continues watching her, his voice low and gentle. “What do you dream about?” Still caught somewhere between dreaming and waking, Susu answers without opening her eyes. “I dream about the braised pork you cooked... the snowman you made... that night when you woke up in the middle of the night, turned over, and wrapped your arms around me again... and... there’s more...” A smile tugs at Qingyi’s lips. Reaching out, he gently taps the tip of her nose. “Why are all your dreams about the past?” he asks softly. “Dream about our future instead... alright?” His voice is so clear and real. Like cool spring water washing over her. In an instant, Susu is fully awake. She stares at him. At the face she has missed for two endless years. Disbelief floods her expression. Before she can even think, instinct takes over. She throws herself at him. The force knocks Qingyi backward onto the grass as she lands against his chest. Supporting herself above him, she hesitantly reaches out, fingertips trembling as they brush against his cheek, almost afraid that touching him will make him disappear. “I...” Her voice quivers. “I’m really not dreaming... am I?” Qingyi slowly sits up, lifting her effortlessly onto his lap. He holds her close and looks into her eyes. “These past two years,” he begins quietly, “I traveled everywhere to recover... to heal my injuries. But wherever I went, I kept dreaming about you.” A faint smile appears on his face. “I dreamed we were sitting together just like this.” His gaze never leaves hers. “I’d tell you, ‘Come here.’ And you’d crawl over like a little cat. I’d hold you and tell you, ‘I was wrong. Don’t be mad anymore.’ You’d pretend not to understand. You’d yawn... and then curl up in my arms.” Tears begin spilling down Susu’s cheeks, but despite herself, she laughs through them. “You certainly know how to dream,” she sniffles. “I waited two whole years for you... and the first thing you do after coming back is try to sweet talk your way into forgiving you?” Qingyi smiles at her with quiet tenderness. “If you truly blamed me,” he says softly, “you would’ve forgotten me.” Another tear escapes Susu’s eyes. At the same moment, a flower petal drifts down from above, landing with the tear against his brow before sliding to his cheek. “If you were a river,” she whispers, “I’d cross it. If you were a mountain, I’d climb it. But you...” Her voice breaks. “How was I ever supposed to forget you?” Qingyi lets out a small, amused laugh, looking almost pleased with himself. “Ren Susu,” he teases, “you really haven’t changed at all.” She cries even harder, lifting her hand to smack him in protest. Before she can, Qingyi catches her wrist. Without another word, he leans forward and kisses her. A breeze rushes through the flowering tree overhead. Petals tumble from the branches like rain, settling in their hair, across their shoulders, and around their embrace. Their kiss lingers beneath the shower of blossoms, until the two lovers are covered completely in the flowers of spring. Qingyi says that he will always find her, and he did. Susu says she will wait for him, and she did. ❤️
0:27

⚠️ TW // MIGHT BE OVERDO SPOILER ⚠️ ⛔️ DO NOT read this tweet if you haven’t watched the actual ending yet, or, you don’t want the ending you want in your head right now to get ruined ⛔️ I already put the warning, so read at your own risk~ Overdo actual ending in original script (that I got). Reason why it didn’t get included in long episode.. probably because they don’t have enough time to shoot it, as we know the filming cycle for is only 90 days. Enjoy reading! ☺️ [33-10] The flames consume the Dongjiadu Waterworks. Smoke billows into the sky as beams collapse one after another. A rescue worker shouts over the roar of the fire. “There is someone!” It is Murong Qingyi. His whole body covered in blood. His breathing is shallow. “Young Master?” “You know him?” The middle aged man nods slowly, disbelief written across his face. “I used to work for Commander Li.” As they carry him away, Qingyi’s fingers twitch. “Susu...” [33-11] 3 Months later. Qingyi slowly regains consciousness in a small clinic. He instinctively tries to sit up. Pain tears through his body, forcing him back onto the bed. The physician quickly stops him. “Don’t move.” Qingyi look at him. “Who helps me? I have to go back.” “Someone who knows you said you need to recover first before you go.” “My wife is waiting for me” “You’ve been unconscious for 3 months. Your burns are severe, several ribs are fractured, and your lungs are injured from smoke inhalation. You won’t even make it out the front door.” Qingyi grips the edge of the bed. — Over the following months, Qingyi travels from one city to another. Everywhere he goes, he seeks renowned physicians and specialists for burns and internal injuries. One elderly doctor examines the scars on his back before shaking his head. ”You pushed your body too far. If you continue traveling before you’ve healed completely, these injuries will stay with you for life.” [33-12] Two years later. A physician smiles as he finishes removing the last bandage from Qingyi’s body. [33-13] Two years later. The rebuilt lakeside cabin in Shencheng looks much the same as it once did. [Montage] Haitang Qing’s voice is heard reading from her letter. “The Fang Trading Company has found its footing again. Our business in Nanyang is flourishing, and so many of our partners are eager to meet the mysterious boss behind it all. The new plane you donated to the aviation academy has already begun training a promising new generation of pilots. The girls’ school we founded has welcomed its very first class of students. The opening ceremony won’t be complete without its chairwoman. Susu... all of us miss you. How much longer are you going to wait for him? He’s not coming back.” The letter continues as glimpses of Susu’s life play out. Le-an sits at his desk practicing calligraphy while Susu patiently guides him, correcting each stroke with gentle encouragement. Later, she tends to the flowers blooming throughout the garden, carefully watering each one. She pushes Le-an on a swing beneath the warm afternoon sun, mother and son laughing together. That night, she reads him a bedtime story. When his breathing evens into sleep, she smiles softly, tucks the blanket around him, and quietly slips from the room. [Montage END] Spring has arrived. Outside the cabin, the lake shimmers beneath the sunlight. Beneath a flowering tree, a picnic blanket has been spread across the grass. Susu sits beneath the blossoms, finishing Haitang Qing’s letter. The warmth of the afternoon makes her drowsy. She places the letter aside, lies down on her side atop the blanket, and slowly drifts into a light sleep. Everything is quiet. Sunlight filters gently through the branches overhead, petals swaying with the breeze. Then a soft gust brushes past. Half asleep, Susu feels someone settle beside her. She lazily opens her eyes. Only inches away is a familiar face. A handsome man dressed in a white shirt lies beside her, his head resting against one hand as he quietly watches her. She simply closes her eyes again. Dreaming of him has become so familiar that it no longer surprises her. A small smile finds its way onto her lips. “This is strange...” she murmurs sleepily. “Why have I been dreaming about you so often lately?” Murong Qingyi continues watching her, his voice low and gentle. “What do you dream about?” Still caught somewhere between dreaming and waking, Susu answers without opening her eyes. “I dream about the braised pork you cooked... the snowman you made... that night when you woke up in the middle of the night, turned over, and wrapped your arms around me again... and... there’s more...” A smile tugs at Qingyi’s lips. Reaching out, he gently taps the tip of her nose. “Why are all your dreams about the past?” he asks softly. “Dream about our future instead... alright?” His voice is so clear and real. Like cool spring water washing over her. In an instant, Susu is fully awake. She stares at him. At the face she has missed for two endless years. Disbelief floods her expression. Before she can even think, instinct takes over. She throws herself at him. The force knocks Qingyi backward onto the grass as she lands against his chest. Supporting herself above him, she hesitantly reaches out, fingertips trembling as they brush against his cheek, almost afraid that touching him will make him disappear. “I...” Her voice quivers. “I’m really not dreaming... am I?” Qingyi slowly sits up, lifting her effortlessly onto his lap. He holds her close and looks into her eyes. “These past two years,” he begins quietly, “I traveled everywhere to recover... to heal my injuries. But wherever I went, I kept dreaming about you.” A faint smile appears on his face. “I dreamed we were sitting together just like this.” His gaze never leaves hers. “I’d tell you, ‘Come here.’ And you’d crawl over like a little cat. I’d hold you and tell you, ‘I was wrong. Don’t be mad anymore.’ You’d pretend not to understand. You’d yawn... and then curl up in my arms.” Tears begin spilling down Susu’s cheeks, but despite herself, she laughs through them. “You certainly know how to dream,” she sniffles. “I waited two whole years for you... and the first thing you do after coming back is try to sweet talk your way into forgiving you?” Qingyi smiles at her with quiet tenderness. “If you truly blamed me,” he says softly, “you would’ve forgotten me.” Another tear escapes Susu’s eyes. At the same moment, a flower petal drifts down from above, landing with the tear against his brow before sliding to his cheek. “If you were a river,” she whispers, “I’d cross it. If you were a mountain, I’d climb it. But you...” Her voice breaks. “How was I ever supposed to forget you?” Qingyi lets out a small, amused laugh, looking almost pleased with himself. “Ren Susu,” he teases, “you really haven’t changed at all.” She cries even harder, lifting her hand to smack him in protest. Before she can, Qingyi catches her wrist. Without another word, he leans forward and kisses her. A breeze rushes through the flowering tree overhead. Petals tumble from the branches like rain, settling in their hair, across their shoulders, and around their embrace. Their kiss lingers beneath the shower of blossoms, until the two lovers are covered completely in the flowers of spring. Qingyi says that he will always find her, and he did. Susu says she will wait for him, and she did. ❤️

Overdo 这一秒过火

66,757 просмотров • 14 дней назад

Trump Keeps Admitting That He Is Bought And Owned By The World’s Richest Israeli It’s bizarre how little mainstream attention is given to the fact that the president of the United States has repeatedly confessed to being bought and owned by the world’s richest Israeli, especially given how intensely fixated his political opposition was on the possibility that he was compromised by a foreign government during his first term. During a speech before the Israeli parliament on Monday, President Trump once again publicly admitted that he has implemented Israel-friendly policies at the behest of Israeli-American billionaire Miriam Adelson and her late husband Sheldon, this time adding that he believes Adelson favors Israel over the United States. Here’s a transcript of Trump’s remarks: “As president, I terminated the disastrous Iran nuclear deal, and ultimately, I terminated Iran’s nuclear program with things called B2 bombers. It was swift and it was accurate, and it was a military beauty. I authorized the spending of billions of dollars, which went to Israel’s defense, as you know. And after years of broken promises from many other American presidents — you know that they kept promising — I never understood it until I got there. There was a lot of pressure put on these presidents. It was put on me, too, but I didn’t yield to the pressure. But every president for decades said, ‘We’re going to do it.’ The difference is I kept my promise and officially recognized the capital of Israel and moved the American Embassy to Jerusalem. “Isn’t that right Miriam? Look at Miriam. She’s back there. Stand up. Miriam and Sheldon [Adelson] would come into the office and call me. They’d call me — I think they had more trips to the White House than anybody else, I guess. Look at her sitting there so innocently — got $60 billion in the bank, $60 billion. And she loves, and she, I think she said, ‘No, more.’ And she loves Israel, but she loves it. And they would come in. And her husband was a very aggressive man, but I loved him. It was a very aggressive, very supportive of me. And he’d call up, ‘Can I come over and see you? I’d say ‘Sheldon, I’m the president of the United States. It doesn’t work that way.’ He’d come in. But they were very responsible for so much, including getting me thinking about Golan Heights, which is probably one of the greatest things ever happened. Miriam, stand up, please. She really is, I mean, she loves this country. She loves this country. Her and her husband are so incredible. We miss him so dearly. But I actually asked her, I’m going to get her in trouble with this. But I actually asked her once, I said, ‘So Miriam, I know you love Israel. What do you love more? The United States or Israel?’ She refused to answer. That means — that might mean Israel, I must say, we love you. Thank you, darling, for being here. That’s a great honor. Great honor. She’s a wonderful woman. She is a great woman.” Sheldon Adelson reportedly gave Trump and the Republicans over $424 million in campaign funding from 2016 up until his death in 2021. His widow Miriam continued her husband’s legacy and poured a further $100 million into Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign. On the 2024 campaign trail Trump also admitted to being controlled by Adelson cash. Here’s a transcript of those remarks: “Just as I promised, I recognize Israel’s eternal capital and opened the American embassy in Jerusalem. Jerusalem became the capital. I also recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights. “You know, Miriam and Sheldon would come into the White House probably almost more than anybody outside of people that work there. And they were always after — and as soon as I’d give them something — always for Israel. As soon as I’d give them something, they’d want something else. I’d say, ‘Give me a couple of weeks, will you, please?’ But I gave them the Golan Heights, and they never even asked for it. “You know, for 72 years they’ve been trying to do the Golan Heights, right? And even Sheldon didn’t have the nerve. But I said, ‘You know what?’ I said to David Friedman, ‘Give me a quick lesson, like five minutes or less on the Golan Heights.’ And he did. And I said, ‘Let’s do it.’ We got it done in about 15 minutes, right?” Legitimizing Israel’s illegal annexation of the Golan Heights and moving the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem were two of the most controversial moves Trump made in Israel’s favor during his first term, which have now been eclipsed by his backing the genocide in Gaza and his bombings of Iran and Yemen. And here is his, openly admitting that his billionaire Zionist megadonors have been using the access their donations bought them to push him to take drastic action in favor of Israel. Just imagine for a second if someone had leaked documents to the press proving that Trump and received extensive financial backing from a Russian oligarch to whom he doled out favors of immense geopolitical consequence. It would be the biggest scandal in the history of American politics, bar none. But because it’s an Israeli oligarch, he can admit to it openly and repeatedly without anyone batting an eye. During Trump’s first term his political rivals spent years pushing a bogus conspiracy theory that he was controlled by Vladimir Putin, despite his having spent that entire term aggressively ramping up cold war hostilities against Russia. Entire political punditry careers were birthed trying to create a scandal out of a narrative that could be plainly seen as false just by looking at the movements of the US war machine and Washington’s actions against Moscow. But here’s Trump openly admitting to bending over backwards to give an Israeli oligarch whatever she wants because she gave his campaign huge sums of money, while pouring weapons into Israel to facilitate its mass atrocities and engaging in acts of war on Israel’s behalf. And it barely makes a blip in mainstream western politics or media. This is because mainstream western politics and media understand that we are living in an unofficial oligarchic empire to which both the US and Israel belong. They never acknowledge it, they never talk about it, but all high-level politicians, pundits and operatives in the western world understand that they serve a globe-spanning power structure run by a loose alliance of plutocrats and empire managers. They understand that states like Israel are a part of said power structure, while states like Russia, China and Iran are not. So they spend their time normalizing the corruption and abuses of imperial member states while facilitating the empire’s efforts to attack and undermine the states which have successfully resisted being absorbed into the imperial power umbrella. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, the only thing I like about Donald Trump is his infantile tendency to say the quiet part out loud. He advances the same kinds of abuses as his predecessors who were no less corrupt and controlled, but he exposes the underlying mechanics of those abuses in ways that more refined presidents never would. Reading by Tim Foley:
7:23

Trump Keeps Admitting That He Is Bought And Owned By The World’s Richest Israeli It’s bizarre how little mainstream attention is given to the fact that the president of the United States has repeatedly confessed to being bought and owned by the world’s richest Israeli, especially given how intensely fixated his political opposition was on the possibility that he was compromised by a foreign government during his first term. During a speech before the Israeli parliament on Monday, President Trump once again publicly admitted that he has implemented Israel-friendly policies at the behest of Israeli-American billionaire Miriam Adelson and her late husband Sheldon, this time adding that he believes Adelson favors Israel over the United States. Here’s a transcript of Trump’s remarks: “As president, I terminated the disastrous Iran nuclear deal, and ultimately, I terminated Iran’s nuclear program with things called B2 bombers. It was swift and it was accurate, and it was a military beauty. I authorized the spending of billions of dollars, which went to Israel’s defense, as you know. And after years of broken promises from many other American presidents — you know that they kept promising — I never understood it until I got there. There was a lot of pressure put on these presidents. It was put on me, too, but I didn’t yield to the pressure. But every president for decades said, ‘We’re going to do it.’ The difference is I kept my promise and officially recognized the capital of Israel and moved the American Embassy to Jerusalem. “Isn’t that right Miriam? Look at Miriam. She’s back there. Stand up. Miriam and Sheldon [Adelson] would come into the office and call me. They’d call me — I think they had more trips to the White House than anybody else, I guess. Look at her sitting there so innocently — got $60 billion in the bank, $60 billion. And she loves, and she, I think she said, ‘No, more.’ And she loves Israel, but she loves it. And they would come in. And her husband was a very aggressive man, but I loved him. It was a very aggressive, very supportive of me. And he’d call up, ‘Can I come over and see you? I’d say ‘Sheldon, I’m the president of the United States. It doesn’t work that way.’ He’d come in. But they were very responsible for so much, including getting me thinking about Golan Heights, which is probably one of the greatest things ever happened. Miriam, stand up, please. She really is, I mean, she loves this country. She loves this country. Her and her husband are so incredible. We miss him so dearly. But I actually asked her, I’m going to get her in trouble with this. But I actually asked her once, I said, ‘So Miriam, I know you love Israel. What do you love more? The United States or Israel?’ She refused to answer. That means — that might mean Israel, I must say, we love you. Thank you, darling, for being here. That’s a great honor. Great honor. She’s a wonderful woman. She is a great woman.” Sheldon Adelson reportedly gave Trump and the Republicans over $424 million in campaign funding from 2016 up until his death in 2021. His widow Miriam continued her husband’s legacy and poured a further $100 million into Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign. On the 2024 campaign trail Trump also admitted to being controlled by Adelson cash. Here’s a transcript of those remarks: “Just as I promised, I recognize Israel’s eternal capital and opened the American embassy in Jerusalem. Jerusalem became the capital. I also recognized Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights. “You know, Miriam and Sheldon would come into the White House probably almost more than anybody outside of people that work there. And they were always after — and as soon as I’d give them something — always for Israel. As soon as I’d give them something, they’d want something else. I’d say, ‘Give me a couple of weeks, will you, please?’ But I gave them the Golan Heights, and they never even asked for it. “You know, for 72 years they’ve been trying to do the Golan Heights, right? And even Sheldon didn’t have the nerve. But I said, ‘You know what?’ I said to David Friedman, ‘Give me a quick lesson, like five minutes or less on the Golan Heights.’ And he did. And I said, ‘Let’s do it.’ We got it done in about 15 minutes, right?” Legitimizing Israel’s illegal annexation of the Golan Heights and moving the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem were two of the most controversial moves Trump made in Israel’s favor during his first term, which have now been eclipsed by his backing the genocide in Gaza and his bombings of Iran and Yemen. And here is his, openly admitting that his billionaire Zionist megadonors have been using the access their donations bought them to push him to take drastic action in favor of Israel. Just imagine for a second if someone had leaked documents to the press proving that Trump and received extensive financial backing from a Russian oligarch to whom he doled out favors of immense geopolitical consequence. It would be the biggest scandal in the history of American politics, bar none. But because it’s an Israeli oligarch, he can admit to it openly and repeatedly without anyone batting an eye. During Trump’s first term his political rivals spent years pushing a bogus conspiracy theory that he was controlled by Vladimir Putin, despite his having spent that entire term aggressively ramping up cold war hostilities against Russia. Entire political punditry careers were birthed trying to create a scandal out of a narrative that could be plainly seen as false just by looking at the movements of the US war machine and Washington’s actions against Moscow. But here’s Trump openly admitting to bending over backwards to give an Israeli oligarch whatever she wants because she gave his campaign huge sums of money, while pouring weapons into Israel to facilitate its mass atrocities and engaging in acts of war on Israel’s behalf. And it barely makes a blip in mainstream western politics or media. This is because mainstream western politics and media understand that we are living in an unofficial oligarchic empire to which both the US and Israel belong. They never acknowledge it, they never talk about it, but all high-level politicians, pundits and operatives in the western world understand that they serve a globe-spanning power structure run by a loose alliance of plutocrats and empire managers. They understand that states like Israel are a part of said power structure, while states like Russia, China and Iran are not. So they spend their time normalizing the corruption and abuses of imperial member states while facilitating the empire’s efforts to attack and undermine the states which have successfully resisted being absorbed into the imperial power umbrella. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, the only thing I like about Donald Trump is his infantile tendency to say the quiet part out loud. He advances the same kinds of abuses as his predecessors who were no less corrupt and controlled, but he exposes the underlying mechanics of those abuses in ways that more refined presidents never would. Reading by Tim Foley:

Caitlin Johnstone

199,675 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

GM Mayor Andy Burnham’s so-called ‘limited’ Assurance Review into the gang rape of young White girls in Oldham, better described as an attempted cover-up of the cover-up, was published on 20th June 2022. Refusing to accept their whitewash, I took to YouTube the day after (June 21, 2022), to deliver the first of my debriefs, exposing the glaring inconsistencies in their narrative. I'd spent 24 hours examining the 200+ page document. The Fight for a Public Inquiry During the live transmission, I systematically dismantled the review’s contradictions, making it clear that the fight for a full Public Inquiry had to continue. At that point, nearly everyone else had either resigned themselves to never uncovering the truth or accused me of lying. Yet, I persisted. It took until January 2025 - over two and a half years later - for Andy Burnham to finally admit his so-called Assurance Review had failed to reveal the truth. The Smear Campaign Realising what I was doing, and all previous attempts to silence me had failed, The Labour Party campaigners orchestrated a new smear operation. They recruited a survivor to work against me, aiming to assemble a group of young women to falsely accuse me of grooming and rape. The survivor’s role was to lend credibility to these fabricated allegations. A so-called ‘journalist,’ Neil Wilby, aligned with Jim McMahon OBE MP, was enlisted to amplify the false narrative, ensuring it gained traction. Both Wilby and McMahon (now a government minister) openly discussed their plans to silence me. By now you know I'm not in the business of lying. This is how desperate they got. This actually happened. They recruited a grooming gang survivor to coach a group of girls to make malicious allegations against me of child rape. Censorship and the Mayor’s Office Despite knowing the consequences of challenging the official story - while also awaiting trial due to a series of malicious prosecutions orchestrated by Greater Manchester Police to silence me - I refused to back down. I shared my analysis and a summary report. Almost immediately, it was taken down by YouTube following a ‘defamation’ complaint. A national inquiry would confirm whether the Mayor’s office played a role in this censorship, or indeed, in any of the attempts to maliciously prosecute me. It is already confirmed that both senior Labour politicians including Oldham Council leader Arooj Shah and her Council repeatedly fabricated evidence to try and have me prosecuted and imprisoned. The Evidence They Tried to Erase Here is the link to the original broadcast. You’ll see for yourself - it has been removed in the UK. Their attempts to silence me failed to stop me. I’ve re-uploaded the video here on X for those who want to hear what they tried to bury. You'll see a younger, less grey and wrinkled version of me, setting out the evidence. In the end, as with all such cases where our government has attempted to cover-up serious injustices, it is only ever the actions of ordinary people that force a reckoning. Sadly, my mother died before I was able to clear my name. I also know that I will never work again in the field I am an expert in because I spoke out against the gang rape of little White girls by groups of Pakistani men. Please Help Me Finish This. If you are coming to me new, my name is Raja Miah MBE. I am responsible for leading a six year campaign that blew the lid off how Labour Party politicians were involved in protecting Pakistani Rape Gangs. You won’t find me on any news channel in the UK nor featured in the legacy press. My work is free for all. No paywalls. No restrictions. No exclusions of any kind. Unfortunately, our numbers aren’t where they need to be. We are up against a powerful machine: legacy media, politicians, police and public officials working together to bury the scale of this cover-up. To fight back, we need to grow. My goal is simple - just 10 new newsletter subscribers a day. Through my newsletter, I document everything in detail - the evidence, the investigations, and the fight for justice. 100% free, though if you can afford to subscribe and financially support me, it costs as little as 75p a week or £30 for the year. 👉 If a monthly subscription isn’t possible, a one-off contribution makes a difference. Every penny goes towards keeping this work alive. 👉 👉 We will not secure a National Inquiry without numbers, without strength, without your support. Please stand with me. 👉 Raja 🙏
53:11

GM Mayor Andy Burnham’s so-called ‘limited’ Assurance Review into the gang rape of young White girls in Oldham, better described as an attempted cover-up of the cover-up, was published on 20th June 2022. Refusing to accept their whitewash, I took to YouTube the day after (June 21, 2022), to deliver the first of my debriefs, exposing the glaring inconsistencies in their narrative. I'd spent 24 hours examining the 200+ page document. The Fight for a Public Inquiry During the live transmission, I systematically dismantled the review’s contradictions, making it clear that the fight for a full Public Inquiry had to continue. At that point, nearly everyone else had either resigned themselves to never uncovering the truth or accused me of lying. Yet, I persisted. It took until January 2025 - over two and a half years later - for Andy Burnham to finally admit his so-called Assurance Review had failed to reveal the truth. The Smear Campaign Realising what I was doing, and all previous attempts to silence me had failed, The Labour Party campaigners orchestrated a new smear operation. They recruited a survivor to work against me, aiming to assemble a group of young women to falsely accuse me of grooming and rape. The survivor’s role was to lend credibility to these fabricated allegations. A so-called ‘journalist,’ Neil Wilby, aligned with Jim McMahon OBE MP, was enlisted to amplify the false narrative, ensuring it gained traction. Both Wilby and McMahon (now a government minister) openly discussed their plans to silence me. By now you know I'm not in the business of lying. This is how desperate they got. This actually happened. They recruited a grooming gang survivor to coach a group of girls to make malicious allegations against me of child rape. Censorship and the Mayor’s Office Despite knowing the consequences of challenging the official story - while also awaiting trial due to a series of malicious prosecutions orchestrated by Greater Manchester Police to silence me - I refused to back down. I shared my analysis and a summary report. Almost immediately, it was taken down by YouTube following a ‘defamation’ complaint. A national inquiry would confirm whether the Mayor’s office played a role in this censorship, or indeed, in any of the attempts to maliciously prosecute me. It is already confirmed that both senior Labour politicians including Oldham Council leader Arooj Shah and her Council repeatedly fabricated evidence to try and have me prosecuted and imprisoned. The Evidence They Tried to Erase Here is the link to the original broadcast. You’ll see for yourself - it has been removed in the UK. Their attempts to silence me failed to stop me. I’ve re-uploaded the video here on X for those who want to hear what they tried to bury. You'll see a younger, less grey and wrinkled version of me, setting out the evidence. In the end, as with all such cases where our government has attempted to cover-up serious injustices, it is only ever the actions of ordinary people that force a reckoning. Sadly, my mother died before I was able to clear my name. I also know that I will never work again in the field I am an expert in because I spoke out against the gang rape of little White girls by groups of Pakistani men. Please Help Me Finish This. If you are coming to me new, my name is Raja Miah MBE. I am responsible for leading a six year campaign that blew the lid off how Labour Party politicians were involved in protecting Pakistani Rape Gangs. You won’t find me on any news channel in the UK nor featured in the legacy press. My work is free for all. No paywalls. No restrictions. No exclusions of any kind. Unfortunately, our numbers aren’t where they need to be. We are up against a powerful machine: legacy media, politicians, police and public officials working together to bury the scale of this cover-up. To fight back, we need to grow. My goal is simple - just 10 new newsletter subscribers a day. Through my newsletter, I document everything in detail - the evidence, the investigations, and the fight for justice. 100% free, though if you can afford to subscribe and financially support me, it costs as little as 75p a week or £30 for the year. 👉 If a monthly subscription isn’t possible, a one-off contribution makes a difference. Every penny goes towards keeping this work alive. 👉 👉 We will not secure a National Inquiry without numbers, without strength, without your support. Please stand with me. 👉 Raja 🙏

Raja Miah

158,721 просмотров • 1 год назад

Nigerian doctors home and abroad!! Take your flowers Healthcare workers - Take your flowers 🌺 I will take that name of Dr squared today. Let me take our flowers on behalf of the Nigerian doctors! No wonder my hair is all white. Person don read sotey people think I really like reading 😔😒 I like money abeg🤣🤣🤣 Why do you think I never argue with random people online or the ‘real’ doctors that got their MBBS or worse, their ‘dermatology’ degree from a 6 months school?? Lol - It ‘didn’t worth’ it. 6 years of medical school. 1 year of internship 1 year of youth service 6 months of being a medical officer 3 and half years of internal medicine 3 years of Dermatology, venerology and some infectious disease along with rheumatology. (This is me that finished in record time o, much longer for some) Before I became a consultant physician and dermatologist in Nigeria in 2018 and then restarted internal medicine residency in America. I will now be arguing with my ‘senior colleagues’ that did an accelerated course to become a ‘dermatologist’ in 6 months? Do I know who they are?? My seniors?? Ahusubillah minah shaytani rajeem. I have to ask God to keep the spirit of arguing with random people who are my bosses on the internet. Tufiakwa. You will not resuscitate a patient in Nigeria even if he/she was brought in as dead as a door nail? Maidear, you must be joking. You will do CPR o. If you’re smart. Because you’re not sure if they brought ‘boys’ from Mushin or ‘Idi-Araba’ to gently re-arrange your face. Nigerian doctors! Take your flowers please!!! The people that see your silent tears when you lose a patient - like my 39 year old pregnant lady with Toxic epidermal necrolysis that I lost. I remember my husband gathering me up in a tight hug when he heard my racking sobs that seemed to consume me. He prayed along with me while I was taking care of her. I saw her young husband’s face as I prayed and came from home as a consultant even when I was off duty on Sunday. Yet, she still died. The people that see the efforts you put in. The family that write you notes to appreciate you after you contribute your money yet again The patient you did a free procedure for The family you donated blood for their child How many do we want to talk about? You think doctors like to lose patients?? Nigerian doctors and all those health care workers in developing countries Those abroad that continue to give back. I continue to teach about the skin, give free consultations, run an active website with my money, even while not in Nigeria. TAKE YOUR FLOWERS!! AND STOP ARGUING WITH RANDOM PEOPLE ONLINE!!! Finally, paraphrasing a question someone asked me on Facebook, “Which do you think is better?” As someone who had done both residency in Nigeria and abroad, here’s my response. “I’ll tell you it has its advantages. There’s one remarkable thing about the brain. The more it is used, the more it becomes even more receptive. Studies have even shown that the risk of Alzheimer’s is lower in those that ‘ use’their brain more. Lol AI has made everyone not use their brain as often as before and clinical acumen is fast becoming a figment of imagination. Because of all these fancy tests, people have forgotten that they’re supposed to COMPLEMENT and not erase your clinical acumen. I’ll say a mixture of the two is better. It makes you a well seasoned doctor Finally, AI is what you feed in. Garbage in, garbage out if not fed by a smart person. Technology makes a smart person smarter and more effective, and a dumb one to become even more dumb. Because technology is what you make of it.” Copyright ©️ Shakirat Gold-Olufadi
2:18

Nigerian doctors home and abroad!! Take your flowers Healthcare workers - Take your flowers 🌺 I will take that name of Dr squared today. Let me take our flowers on behalf of the Nigerian doctors! No wonder my hair is all white. Person don read sotey people think I really like reading 😔😒 I like money abeg🤣🤣🤣 Why do you think I never argue with random people online or the ‘real’ doctors that got their MBBS or worse, their ‘dermatology’ degree from a 6 months school?? Lol - It ‘didn’t worth’ it. 6 years of medical school. 1 year of internship 1 year of youth service 6 months of being a medical officer 3 and half years of internal medicine 3 years of Dermatology, venerology and some infectious disease along with rheumatology. (This is me that finished in record time o, much longer for some) Before I became a consultant physician and dermatologist in Nigeria in 2018 and then restarted internal medicine residency in America. I will now be arguing with my ‘senior colleagues’ that did an accelerated course to become a ‘dermatologist’ in 6 months? Do I know who they are?? My seniors?? Ahusubillah minah shaytani rajeem. I have to ask God to keep the spirit of arguing with random people who are my bosses on the internet. Tufiakwa. You will not resuscitate a patient in Nigeria even if he/she was brought in as dead as a door nail? Maidear, you must be joking. You will do CPR o. If you’re smart. Because you’re not sure if they brought ‘boys’ from Mushin or ‘Idi-Araba’ to gently re-arrange your face. Nigerian doctors! Take your flowers please!!! The people that see your silent tears when you lose a patient - like my 39 year old pregnant lady with Toxic epidermal necrolysis that I lost. I remember my husband gathering me up in a tight hug when he heard my racking sobs that seemed to consume me. He prayed along with me while I was taking care of her. I saw her young husband’s face as I prayed and came from home as a consultant even when I was off duty on Sunday. Yet, she still died. The people that see the efforts you put in. The family that write you notes to appreciate you after you contribute your money yet again The patient you did a free procedure for The family you donated blood for their child How many do we want to talk about? You think doctors like to lose patients?? Nigerian doctors and all those health care workers in developing countries Those abroad that continue to give back. I continue to teach about the skin, give free consultations, run an active website with my money, even while not in Nigeria. TAKE YOUR FLOWERS!! AND STOP ARGUING WITH RANDOM PEOPLE ONLINE!!! Finally, paraphrasing a question someone asked me on Facebook, “Which do you think is better?” As someone who had done both residency in Nigeria and abroad, here’s my response. “I’ll tell you it has its advantages. There’s one remarkable thing about the brain. The more it is used, the more it becomes even more receptive. Studies have even shown that the risk of Alzheimer’s is lower in those that ‘ use’their brain more. Lol AI has made everyone not use their brain as often as before and clinical acumen is fast becoming a figment of imagination. Because of all these fancy tests, people have forgotten that they’re supposed to COMPLEMENT and not erase your clinical acumen. I’ll say a mixture of the two is better. It makes you a well seasoned doctor Finally, AI is what you feed in. Garbage in, garbage out if not fed by a smart person. Technology makes a smart person smarter and more effective, and a dumb one to become even more dumb. Because technology is what you make of it.” Copyright ©️ Shakirat Gold-Olufadi

Gold-Olufadi Shakirat

39,378 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

The spat between Restore and Zionists is infuriating. They both want the same thing. Now to alienate my fellow rightoids AND my “Zionist paymasters” at the same time... There is a concerted effort to bring down Britain's insurgent right-wing party, Restore. They've been accused of racism and anti-Semitism following Restore co-founder Charlie Downes' insinuations that Nigel Farage has been bought by Israel, and his claim that "Restore believe that Britain is a people defined by indigenous British ancestry and Christian faith." Before I, an Anglo-Saxon white man, start talking about Zionism and Israel and the Jews, I should point out I'm a massive fan. I'm a Zionist. I believe the Jews have a right to a homeland, a right to self-determination and to control their borders. The thing is - I believe that the men and women of Britain have this right as well. And this seems to be where I diverge from the people criticising Restore. Jewish journalist Melanie Phillips thundered, "The far right noisily identify British identity with Christianity...[but]... A Hindu or a Sikh, a Jew or a Muslim is as British as anyone else." And she said of migrants, "Upon taking citizenship, all become equally British." But this clashes with her vision of Israel. "Israel is a Jewish state. Its national identity is Israeli and Jewish. So Arabs can only have the first, civic identity, but not the culturally fundamental second one." Hmmm...no "just as Israeli as anyone else" there. Melanie Phillips accepts an ancestral/peoplehood basis for Jewish national self-determination in Israel while expressly denying that British national identity has an equivalent ethnic or ancestry-based character. In the Telegraph, Alister Heath said "Rupert Lowe’s racist cheerleaders can no longer hide their despicable extremism. Downes believes that the fact that 54 per cent of babies were born to white British mothers in 2024 – and thus that 46 per cent were born to “white other”, mixed race or non-white mothers – as “an existential threat to our nation”. This claim, this specific sentence, is racist" But wait a minute. Surely the fact that people whose lineage is outside Britain are popping out nearly half of the babies in the UK is a bit alarming? For all that we might pretend that these people are just as British as anyone else, there's evidence that many are not. I see flags of barbarous third-world regimes waved on Britain's streets. I see a newspaper for black Britons telling me that only one in ten black feel proud to be British. I see David Lammy, a poster boy for an integrated minority, agitate for reparations for foreign countries. I'm a civic nationalist at heart, I genuinely believe people can come here and integrate. But civic nationalism is an ideal. It doesn't necessarily work as planned in the real world, and as distasteful as it might be to bleeding heart liberals such as me, it requires a certain amount of ethno-nationalism. We all know that if Britain became 99% Eritrean overnight, then regardless of what "values" the Eritreans had, we would have a very different country. There's an interesting term that's arisen on the right, "demographic security", where a certain proportion of the British population has to be of British lineage before more migrants are allowed in. This makes sense to me. It preserves the harmony and security of this country and makes it a better place for migrants as well. Israel understands this. They publish the fertility rates of their Arab Muslims alongside the Jewish population as a nudge to Israeli Jews to keep up, or be replaced. Restore have been criticised for presenting over-simplified solutions to complex problems, but there genuinely are simple solutions. Pakistan deported 2.4 million Afghan migrants. They just did it. They told them to go home and, in some cases, laid on coaches to help. Given that Britain used to control a third of the world, I think we can achieve a goal of "being able to do what Pakistan is capable of doing". The right should be the natural ally of Israel and Jews. Israel is the front line of Western civilisation. Israel shows the West how to handle the threat of Islamism, and how to have a healthy nationalism. And what's interesting is that every Jew I know, every Israeli I spoke to, wants Britain to have this healthy nationalism and wants Britain to control its borders. I think a lot of Jews understand that their survival in both countries is dependent on those countries not being overrun by third world barbarians who want to kill Jews. We all know it's not smartly dressed young Restore candidates who are going on stabbing rampages at synagogues.
12:20

The spat between Restore and Zionists is infuriating. They both want the same thing. Now to alienate my fellow rightoids AND my “Zionist paymasters” at the same time... There is a concerted effort to bring down Britain's insurgent right-wing party, Restore. They've been accused of racism and anti-Semitism following Restore co-founder Charlie Downes' insinuations that Nigel Farage has been bought by Israel, and his claim that "Restore believe that Britain is a people defined by indigenous British ancestry and Christian faith." Before I, an Anglo-Saxon white man, start talking about Zionism and Israel and the Jews, I should point out I'm a massive fan. I'm a Zionist. I believe the Jews have a right to a homeland, a right to self-determination and to control their borders. The thing is - I believe that the men and women of Britain have this right as well. And this seems to be where I diverge from the people criticising Restore. Jewish journalist Melanie Phillips thundered, "The far right noisily identify British identity with Christianity...[but]... A Hindu or a Sikh, a Jew or a Muslim is as British as anyone else." And she said of migrants, "Upon taking citizenship, all become equally British." But this clashes with her vision of Israel. "Israel is a Jewish state. Its national identity is Israeli and Jewish. So Arabs can only have the first, civic identity, but not the culturally fundamental second one." Hmmm...no "just as Israeli as anyone else" there. Melanie Phillips accepts an ancestral/peoplehood basis for Jewish national self-determination in Israel while expressly denying that British national identity has an equivalent ethnic or ancestry-based character. In the Telegraph, Alister Heath said "Rupert Lowe’s racist cheerleaders can no longer hide their despicable extremism. Downes believes that the fact that 54 per cent of babies were born to white British mothers in 2024 – and thus that 46 per cent were born to “white other”, mixed race or non-white mothers – as “an existential threat to our nation”. This claim, this specific sentence, is racist" But wait a minute. Surely the fact that people whose lineage is outside Britain are popping out nearly half of the babies in the UK is a bit alarming? For all that we might pretend that these people are just as British as anyone else, there's evidence that many are not. I see flags of barbarous third-world regimes waved on Britain's streets. I see a newspaper for black Britons telling me that only one in ten black feel proud to be British. I see David Lammy, a poster boy for an integrated minority, agitate for reparations for foreign countries. I'm a civic nationalist at heart, I genuinely believe people can come here and integrate. But civic nationalism is an ideal. It doesn't necessarily work as planned in the real world, and as distasteful as it might be to bleeding heart liberals such as me, it requires a certain amount of ethno-nationalism. We all know that if Britain became 99% Eritrean overnight, then regardless of what "values" the Eritreans had, we would have a very different country. There's an interesting term that's arisen on the right, "demographic security", where a certain proportion of the British population has to be of British lineage before more migrants are allowed in. This makes sense to me. It preserves the harmony and security of this country and makes it a better place for migrants as well. Israel understands this. They publish the fertility rates of their Arab Muslims alongside the Jewish population as a nudge to Israeli Jews to keep up, or be replaced. Restore have been criticised for presenting over-simplified solutions to complex problems, but there genuinely are simple solutions. Pakistan deported 2.4 million Afghan migrants. They just did it. They told them to go home and, in some cases, laid on coaches to help. Given that Britain used to control a third of the world, I think we can achieve a goal of "being able to do what Pakistan is capable of doing". The right should be the natural ally of Israel and Jews. Israel is the front line of Western civilisation. Israel shows the West how to handle the threat of Islamism, and how to have a healthy nationalism. And what's interesting is that every Jew I know, every Israeli I spoke to, wants Britain to have this healthy nationalism and wants Britain to control its borders. I think a lot of Jews understand that their survival in both countries is dependent on those countries not being overrun by third world barbarians who want to kill Jews. We all know it's not smartly dressed young Restore candidates who are going on stabbing rampages at synagogues.

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

266,040 просмотров • 3 дней назад

The Charlie Kirk memorial service in Arizona, attended by an estimated 100,000 people, was a bastion of hatred, fascism, and Christian nationalism, say journalists and influential progressives. “The memorial service for Charlie Kirk on Sunday began with somber remembrances and anecdotes from friends,” wrote the New York Times, “before turning more explicitly to politics and vows to crush enemies of Mr. Kirk’s conservative movement.” Trump said, “I hate my opponents. And I don’t want the best for them!" And Trump Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller “plagiarized from two [Nazi propagandist] Goebbels speeches: 1930 funeral of Horst Wessel and 1932’s A Storm is Coming,” according to one progressive X poster. Another influential progressive, Steven Bonnell II, who goes by “Destiny,” said, “This Charlie Kirk ‘memorial’ is indistinguishable from a Nazi rally and fuck anyone who wants to pretend it's not.” But there was no evidence of Nazism on display, Kirk’s widow explicitly spoke against hate, and many speakers spoke of love and forgiveness. Erika Kirk forgave her husband’s assassin, saying, “I forgive him because it is what Christ did. The answer to hate is not hate.” Trump’s comments were made while unfavorably contrasting himself to Kirk. “He was a missionary with a noble spirit and a great, great purpose,” said Trump. “He did not hate his opponents. He wanted the best for them. That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponent.” The only evidence that Destiny gave for Nazism was a photo of Trump looking out over a large crowd and a photo of Hitler overlooking a large crowd. And there is no evidence of any plagiarism by Miller, who is Jewish and whose great-grandparents escaped pogroms in Russia, of Goebbels, as various efforts to link them show. It is reasonable to be concerned by some of the remarks at the memorial service and rally. Miller said, “We will prevail over the forces of wickedness and evil. They cannot imagine what they have awakened. They cannot conceive of the army that they have arisen in all of us. Because we stand for what is good, what is virtuous.” Miller said the Trump administration would “uproot and dismantle these terrorist networks” even though there is no evidence that Tyler Robinson, the only suspect in the assassination of Kirk, had help from “terrorist networks.” Last week, Trump designated the Antifa movement as a terrorist organization, even though Antifa is not an organization but rather an ideology, and the law does not allow the government to designate a domestic group as a terrorist organization. But the law and the First Amendment significantly limit what the administration can do to groups that are supportive of terrorist groups. In 2010, when the Supreme Court upheld the prosecution of a nonprofit charity, which had directly financed terrorism, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. made a point of saying that efforts to criminalize support for terrorist groups might not “survive First Amendment scrutiny.” The government cannot easily prosecute employers whose employees break the law on their own time. And the Trump administration and broader Right appeared to find a higher and potentially more powerful gear, morally and spiritually since Kirk’s assasination. Erika Kirk’s appeal to the Christian value of forgiveness anchored the entire memorial service. In the New Testament, Jesus teaches that forgiveness is not optional but essential for those who follow him. Participation in the event inspired Elon Musk to post on X a phrase from the Lord’s Prayer, “forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us” (Matthew 6:12). And the event appears to have helped Musk bury the hatchet with Trump, with whom he had a falling out in June. “For Charlie,” posted Musk and the White House with a picture of him and Trump. And yet, the response from the Left to the Christianity and patriotism on display at the memorial was one of hostility. A mega-viral X post, with five million views and 20,000 resposts, said about Erika Kirk’s forgiveness, “white supremacy is so crazy because he literally killed your husband and your forgiving him because he's white,” attributing to racism what Kirk credited to her Christianity. Another poster condemned a video clip of Trump and Kirk listening and singing along to a religious choral rendition of “America the Beautiful,” saying, “Inappropriate doesn’t even come close to describing whatever the fuck this is.” Still another said, “The Charlie Kirk memorial is a Christian Nationalist political rally.” The bizarre accusations led Jonathan Wong on X to jokingly attribute Erika Kirk’s statement — “That man, that young man, I forgive him" to “Adolf Hitler, 1939.” Why is that? Why does the Left conflate Christianity and patriotism with racism and Nazism? Why does so much of the Left’s dislike and hatred of Kirk appear to be related to his Christianity and his patriotism and nationalism? If you're not already a subscriber, please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the rest of the video!
5:36

The Charlie Kirk memorial service in Arizona, attended by an estimated 100,000 people, was a bastion of hatred, fascism, and Christian nationalism, say journalists and influential progressives. “The memorial service for Charlie Kirk on Sunday began with somber remembrances and anecdotes from friends,” wrote the New York Times, “before turning more explicitly to politics and vows to crush enemies of Mr. Kirk’s conservative movement.” Trump said, “I hate my opponents. And I don’t want the best for them!" And Trump Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller “plagiarized from two [Nazi propagandist] Goebbels speeches: 1930 funeral of Horst Wessel and 1932’s A Storm is Coming,” according to one progressive X poster. Another influential progressive, Steven Bonnell II, who goes by “Destiny,” said, “This Charlie Kirk ‘memorial’ is indistinguishable from a Nazi rally and fuck anyone who wants to pretend it's not.” But there was no evidence of Nazism on display, Kirk’s widow explicitly spoke against hate, and many speakers spoke of love and forgiveness. Erika Kirk forgave her husband’s assassin, saying, “I forgive him because it is what Christ did. The answer to hate is not hate.” Trump’s comments were made while unfavorably contrasting himself to Kirk. “He was a missionary with a noble spirit and a great, great purpose,” said Trump. “He did not hate his opponents. He wanted the best for them. That’s where I disagreed with Charlie. I hate my opponent.” The only evidence that Destiny gave for Nazism was a photo of Trump looking out over a large crowd and a photo of Hitler overlooking a large crowd. And there is no evidence of any plagiarism by Miller, who is Jewish and whose great-grandparents escaped pogroms in Russia, of Goebbels, as various efforts to link them show. It is reasonable to be concerned by some of the remarks at the memorial service and rally. Miller said, “We will prevail over the forces of wickedness and evil. They cannot imagine what they have awakened. They cannot conceive of the army that they have arisen in all of us. Because we stand for what is good, what is virtuous.” Miller said the Trump administration would “uproot and dismantle these terrorist networks” even though there is no evidence that Tyler Robinson, the only suspect in the assassination of Kirk, had help from “terrorist networks.” Last week, Trump designated the Antifa movement as a terrorist organization, even though Antifa is not an organization but rather an ideology, and the law does not allow the government to designate a domestic group as a terrorist organization. But the law and the First Amendment significantly limit what the administration can do to groups that are supportive of terrorist groups. In 2010, when the Supreme Court upheld the prosecution of a nonprofit charity, which had directly financed terrorism, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. made a point of saying that efforts to criminalize support for terrorist groups might not “survive First Amendment scrutiny.” The government cannot easily prosecute employers whose employees break the law on their own time. And the Trump administration and broader Right appeared to find a higher and potentially more powerful gear, morally and spiritually since Kirk’s assasination. Erika Kirk’s appeal to the Christian value of forgiveness anchored the entire memorial service. In the New Testament, Jesus teaches that forgiveness is not optional but essential for those who follow him. Participation in the event inspired Elon Musk to post on X a phrase from the Lord’s Prayer, “forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us” (Matthew 6:12). And the event appears to have helped Musk bury the hatchet with Trump, with whom he had a falling out in June. “For Charlie,” posted Musk and the White House with a picture of him and Trump. And yet, the response from the Left to the Christianity and patriotism on display at the memorial was one of hostility. A mega-viral X post, with five million views and 20,000 resposts, said about Erika Kirk’s forgiveness, “white supremacy is so crazy because he literally killed your husband and your forgiving him because he's white,” attributing to racism what Kirk credited to her Christianity. Another poster condemned a video clip of Trump and Kirk listening and singing along to a religious choral rendition of “America the Beautiful,” saying, “Inappropriate doesn’t even come close to describing whatever the fuck this is.” Still another said, “The Charlie Kirk memorial is a Christian Nationalist political rally.” The bizarre accusations led Jonathan Wong on X to jokingly attribute Erika Kirk’s statement — “That man, that young man, I forgive him" to “Adolf Hitler, 1939.” Why is that? Why does the Left conflate Christianity and patriotism with racism and Nazism? Why does so much of the Left’s dislike and hatred of Kirk appear to be related to his Christianity and his patriotism and nationalism? If you're not already a subscriber, please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the rest of the video!

Michael Shellenberger

52,807 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Democrats are moderating in anticipation of the midterm elections, according to many analysts. The New Democrat Coalition, a large center-left bloc of Democrats in the House, urged the party last week to adopt a “more moderate approach” focused on affordability and economic anxiety rather than “splashy populist promises.” Third Way, a center-left think tank, published polling last week showing that 55% of young men want the Democratic Party to become more moderate, while just 30% want it to move further left. In 2024, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez removed the pronouns from her bio. After the 2024 elections, Gavin Newsom criticized trans-identifying men being allowed to compete in women’s sports. And, over the last three days, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, in separate events, urged Democrats to moderate on immigration, homelessness, and “virtue signaling.” But the analysts are wrong. On most of their major issues, Democrats remain wedded to the same agenda that lost them control of the White House in 2024. Clinton invited a trans-identified congressman, Sarah McBride (D-DE), to participate on her panel, “Girls Just Want to Have Fundamental Rights,” at the Munich meeting, despite overwhelming voter opposition to trans-identified males in female sport and trans medicine for minors. Newsom backed away from his criticism of males in female sports shortly after making it, and his hand-picked Attorney General sued the Trump administration to allow it to continue. During the House hearing on a bill to ban males from women’s sports, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said, “Bigoted folks love this bill. Assaulters love this bill.” Obama, in an interview, framed climate change as apocalyptic and proposed green jobs as the solution, which is identical to his framing in 2007, saying “We believe in government as a tool for good, as a potential force to create more jobs, and as a way to make sure that the planet doesn’t roast, to make sure that as we move forward and the economy grows, that everybody and not just some, are benefiting.” As for the New Democrats and Third Way, they have been making the same arguments for the last 20 years, a period during which the Democrats became a radical-Left party. It’s true that there are some signs of Democrats moderating their agenda. Democratic Governors Abigail Spanberger and Mikie Sherrill, in Virginia and New Jersey, respectively, won office last year running on more moderate agendas. “Spanberger runs what would be considered a more centrist campaign,” noted Obama, “and Mamdani in New York runs an explicitly socialist, grassroots campaign… That can win in New York City. It probably could not win in Virginia. And that’s okay.” He also said, “We’re a nation of laws, we have borders, and we’ve got to figure out an immigration policy that is orderly,” while Clinton said, “It went too far, it’s been disruptive and destabilizing, and it needs to be fixed in a humane way with secure borders.” And Obama on homelessness said, “We should also recognize that the average person doesn’t want to have to navigate around a tent city in the middle of downtown, and that we’re not going to be able to build a working majority… if we simply say, ‘You know what, it’s not their fault, and so they should be able to do whatever they want.’” But continuing radicalism overwhelms signs of reform. Obama said in the same interview, “It is an atrocity that in a country that’s wealthy we have people on the streets,” reinforcing the dominant myth on the Left that poverty, not addiction and untreated mental illness, causes “homelessness” and that more subsidized housing will reduce it rather than make it worse, as it has for the last 40 years. Clinton, on a different panel in Munich, scoffed at a Czech politician after he said, “I think what Trump is doing in America is a reaction to policies that really went too far,” pointing to transgenderism. Both Clinton and Obama addressed only how to carry out mass migration, not whether to do so. This focus on changing words, not policies, is true across the board, with Democrats moderating on rhetoric, not agenda. When Spanberger came into office, she ended the state’s cooperation with ICE and simply framed it as anti-crime rather than pro-migrant. She and Sherrill opted for law enforcement optics, but their agendas are little different from Mamdani’s. Obama, in his interview, gave lip service to free speech, but did not renounce his 2022 call for government censorship of social media platforms. The lack of moderation also goes for race, where Democrats falsely accuse their opponents of racism for opposing mass migration, racial preferences, de-policing black neighborhoods, and reparations. Governor Newsom vetoed bills that would have established concrete financial reparations for black descendants of slaves, but also approved legislation to spend $6 million to research how to verify descendants of enslaved people so a future government can give them benefits. While Democratic leaders deprioritized racial justice as a standalone platform in favor of universal economic themes, namely affordability, there has been no “Sister Souljah moment” where a leader renounces the party’s left wing, as Bill Clinton famously did in 1992. All of this could hurt Democrats’ chances of taking back the House and Senate in the fall midterm elections and of running a moderate agenda in 2028. If there was ever a time to moderate, it was in 2025, and it didn’t happen. Voters aren’t reliably liberal. In fact, where 35% of U.S. adults identify as conservative, 33% as moderate, and just 28% as liberal. “Democrats have little credibility,” sociologist Musa Al-Gharbi told the New York Times last month, “because they have been supporting lots of censorship on everything from insufficiently progressive views on race and gender, to suppressing views on contentious political issues in the name of fighting ‘misinformation’ and more. They and their fellow travelers have spent the past decade lowering standards, defining things like standardized tests as racist (former Rep. Jamaal Bowman famously compared testing to ‘modern day slavery’).” Political scientist Yascha Monk agreed, noting that “while Democrats may temporarily be de-emphasizing some of the rhetoric that made them so unpopular, most voters do not believe that they have had a real change of heart about wokeness or D.E.I. — much less that they have a coherent set of political ideas to fill the resulting vacuum.” In January, a Wall Street Journal poll found that even though voters disapproved of Trump on many issues, including the economy, inflation, and immigration, they still favored Congressional Republicans over Democrats on those issues. “In other words,” wrote Thomas Edsall in the Times, “Trump is in hot water on a wide range of issues, but that has failed to translate into Democratic ascendance, signaling continued wariness and distrust of the party.” Noted another political scientist, “Democrats must de-escalate acrimonious rhetoric, condemn political violence across the country, promote cross-partisan citizen dialogues, town halls, and deliberative forums nationwide, and reframe polarizing media content.” But they haven’t done so. On the contrary. Fifty-five percent of people who self-identified as left of center told pollsters last year it would be at least somewhat justified to murder Donald Trump, and 48 percent said the same about Elon Musk. And 25 percent of people who describe themselves as “very liberal” and 17 percent of people who describe themselves as “liberal” say that it is sometimes justified to resort to violence to achieve political goals. Only 6 percent of people who describe themselves as “conservative” and 3 percent as “very conservative” said the same. That’s a nearly five-to-one difference. So why is that? Why haven’t Democratic leaders and politicians sought to moderate their agendas, and not just their language? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!
8:08

Democrats are moderating in anticipation of the midterm elections, according to many analysts. The New Democrat Coalition, a large center-left bloc of Democrats in the House, urged the party last week to adopt a “more moderate approach” focused on affordability and economic anxiety rather than “splashy populist promises.” Third Way, a center-left think tank, published polling last week showing that 55% of young men want the Democratic Party to become more moderate, while just 30% want it to move further left. In 2024, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez removed the pronouns from her bio. After the 2024 elections, Gavin Newsom criticized trans-identifying men being allowed to compete in women’s sports. And, over the last three days, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, in separate events, urged Democrats to moderate on immigration, homelessness, and “virtue signaling.” But the analysts are wrong. On most of their major issues, Democrats remain wedded to the same agenda that lost them control of the White House in 2024. Clinton invited a trans-identified congressman, Sarah McBride (D-DE), to participate on her panel, “Girls Just Want to Have Fundamental Rights,” at the Munich meeting, despite overwhelming voter opposition to trans-identified males in female sport and trans medicine for minors. Newsom backed away from his criticism of males in female sports shortly after making it, and his hand-picked Attorney General sued the Trump administration to allow it to continue. During the House hearing on a bill to ban males from women’s sports, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said, “Bigoted folks love this bill. Assaulters love this bill.” Obama, in an interview, framed climate change as apocalyptic and proposed green jobs as the solution, which is identical to his framing in 2007, saying “We believe in government as a tool for good, as a potential force to create more jobs, and as a way to make sure that the planet doesn’t roast, to make sure that as we move forward and the economy grows, that everybody and not just some, are benefiting.” As for the New Democrats and Third Way, they have been making the same arguments for the last 20 years, a period during which the Democrats became a radical-Left party. It’s true that there are some signs of Democrats moderating their agenda. Democratic Governors Abigail Spanberger and Mikie Sherrill, in Virginia and New Jersey, respectively, won office last year running on more moderate agendas. “Spanberger runs what would be considered a more centrist campaign,” noted Obama, “and Mamdani in New York runs an explicitly socialist, grassroots campaign… That can win in New York City. It probably could not win in Virginia. And that’s okay.” He also said, “We’re a nation of laws, we have borders, and we’ve got to figure out an immigration policy that is orderly,” while Clinton said, “It went too far, it’s been disruptive and destabilizing, and it needs to be fixed in a humane way with secure borders.” And Obama on homelessness said, “We should also recognize that the average person doesn’t want to have to navigate around a tent city in the middle of downtown, and that we’re not going to be able to build a working majority… if we simply say, ‘You know what, it’s not their fault, and so they should be able to do whatever they want.’” But continuing radicalism overwhelms signs of reform. Obama said in the same interview, “It is an atrocity that in a country that’s wealthy we have people on the streets,” reinforcing the dominant myth on the Left that poverty, not addiction and untreated mental illness, causes “homelessness” and that more subsidized housing will reduce it rather than make it worse, as it has for the last 40 years. Clinton, on a different panel in Munich, scoffed at a Czech politician after he said, “I think what Trump is doing in America is a reaction to policies that really went too far,” pointing to transgenderism. Both Clinton and Obama addressed only how to carry out mass migration, not whether to do so. This focus on changing words, not policies, is true across the board, with Democrats moderating on rhetoric, not agenda. When Spanberger came into office, she ended the state’s cooperation with ICE and simply framed it as anti-crime rather than pro-migrant. She and Sherrill opted for law enforcement optics, but their agendas are little different from Mamdani’s. Obama, in his interview, gave lip service to free speech, but did not renounce his 2022 call for government censorship of social media platforms. The lack of moderation also goes for race, where Democrats falsely accuse their opponents of racism for opposing mass migration, racial preferences, de-policing black neighborhoods, and reparations. Governor Newsom vetoed bills that would have established concrete financial reparations for black descendants of slaves, but also approved legislation to spend $6 million to research how to verify descendants of enslaved people so a future government can give them benefits. While Democratic leaders deprioritized racial justice as a standalone platform in favor of universal economic themes, namely affordability, there has been no “Sister Souljah moment” where a leader renounces the party’s left wing, as Bill Clinton famously did in 1992. All of this could hurt Democrats’ chances of taking back the House and Senate in the fall midterm elections and of running a moderate agenda in 2028. If there was ever a time to moderate, it was in 2025, and it didn’t happen. Voters aren’t reliably liberal. In fact, where 35% of U.S. adults identify as conservative, 33% as moderate, and just 28% as liberal. “Democrats have little credibility,” sociologist Musa Al-Gharbi told the New York Times last month, “because they have been supporting lots of censorship on everything from insufficiently progressive views on race and gender, to suppressing views on contentious political issues in the name of fighting ‘misinformation’ and more. They and their fellow travelers have spent the past decade lowering standards, defining things like standardized tests as racist (former Rep. Jamaal Bowman famously compared testing to ‘modern day slavery’).” Political scientist Yascha Monk agreed, noting that “while Democrats may temporarily be de-emphasizing some of the rhetoric that made them so unpopular, most voters do not believe that they have had a real change of heart about wokeness or D.E.I. — much less that they have a coherent set of political ideas to fill the resulting vacuum.” In January, a Wall Street Journal poll found that even though voters disapproved of Trump on many issues, including the economy, inflation, and immigration, they still favored Congressional Republicans over Democrats on those issues. “In other words,” wrote Thomas Edsall in the Times, “Trump is in hot water on a wide range of issues, but that has failed to translate into Democratic ascendance, signaling continued wariness and distrust of the party.” Noted another political scientist, “Democrats must de-escalate acrimonious rhetoric, condemn political violence across the country, promote cross-partisan citizen dialogues, town halls, and deliberative forums nationwide, and reframe polarizing media content.” But they haven’t done so. On the contrary. Fifty-five percent of people who self-identified as left of center told pollsters last year it would be at least somewhat justified to murder Donald Trump, and 48 percent said the same about Elon Musk. And 25 percent of people who describe themselves as “very liberal” and 17 percent of people who describe themselves as “liberal” say that it is sometimes justified to resort to violence to achieve political goals. Only 6 percent of people who describe themselves as “conservative” and 3 percent as “very conservative” said the same. That’s a nearly five-to-one difference. So why is that? Why haven’t Democratic leaders and politicians sought to moderate their agendas, and not just their language? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video!

Michael Shellenberger

58,299 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

There is a growing unease across Britain - one that dares not speak its name. For years, the public was told to look away, to avoid uncomfortable truths for fear of being labelled racist or xenophobic. But the evidence is mounting, and the patterns are too stark to ignore. From the cover-up of industrial-scale rape gangs to the rise of sectarian bloc voting, a dangerous new force has taken root in our institutions. It is not just about race or religion, it is about power, loyalty, and control. At the heart of it lies a deeply entrenched system imported from Pakistan: the clan. These clans, operating more like organised crime families than traditional immigrant communities, have quietly embedded themselves into the fabric of British politics and public life. And yet, few dare to speak of it. Until now. We are right to describe these networks as Pakistani Rape Clans, not simply Pakistani Rape Gangs. The term “clan” better reflects the structure, loyalty, and operational dynamics at play. As Professor Alexis Jay observed during her investigation into the Rotherham scandal, these clans often trace their roots to a specific region of Pakistan. This distinction matters, and it should shape how we think about these crimes and the systems that allow them to flourish. We need to move beyond the vague and misleading label of “Asian grooming gangs.” Precision matters, and with it comes a clearer understanding of how these clans operate - and why they evade scrutiny. 1. Clan Structures and the Limits of Western Oversight In Pakistani communities, the clan (or baradari) structure creates a web of loyalty that transcends the nuclear family model most Western institutions are built to monitor. In the UK, declarations of interest, meant to prevent conflicts of interest among politicians and public servants, typically require disclosure of ties only to close family members, such as spouses or children. But in these Pakistani clans, the network extends far beyond. First cousin marriages are common and reinforce familial bonds, while informal financial systems like “committee” (a parallel banking and loan scheme) bind families together economically. These networks create an almost impenetrable wall of loyalty and dependency. The result? These clans can operate much like mafia families. Within a single clan, you may find elected officials, police officers, civil servants, and members of organised crime - all working in a web of protection and mutual interest. Our traditional safeguards, rooted in Western definitions of family, simply aren’t equipped to detect these relationships. 2. Electoral Corruption and Clan-Controlled Power This clan dominance doesn't stop at cultural or economic networks, it extends deep into British democracy itself. Postal vote fraud and Muslim bloc voting have become powerful tools for entrenching sectarian, clan-affiliated politicians in office. In many towns, entire neighbourhoods vote not as individuals, but as a single bloc - under instructions from community leaders or mosque elders who act on behalf of the clan’s interests. Postal votes, often harvested or filled in under coercion, ensure that dissenting voices, especially women or younger voters, are silenced before they even reach the ballot box. This isn’t democracy. It’s feudalism by post, where elections become little more than coronation ceremonies for candidates who owe their loyalty not to constituents or country, but to the clan. These same politicians then sit in Parliament or local councils, not just as representatives of political parties, but as nodes in a wider network - often untouchable, protected by cultural taboos, political correctness, and accusations of racism. 3. The Implications: What Are We Missing? This raises a crucial question: Which clans do certain public figures belong to? Once we apply a clan-based lens to political activity, the picture begins to sharpen. Take Tahir Ali MP. He has previously used his parliamentary platform to advocate for blasphemy laws - echoing the values of hardline Pakistani clerics, not British liberal democracy. He has also pushed for an airport in Mirpur, a bizarre priority unless you understand the pull of clan ties and dual allegiances between the UK and a single region in Pakistan. Then there’s Shabana Mahmood MP, who this week intervened to defend the censorship of rape gang trial transcripts, objecting to public access that could expose cultural or religious motivations behind the crimes. Instead of siding with transparency and justice, the Justice Secretary sided with concealment. And @AfzalKhanMCR? Despite his position as an MP for Manchester Gorton and former Mayor of the great city, he has remained conspicuously silent on Operation Augusta - a police investigation into hundreds, if not thousands, of child sexual exploitation victims in Greater Manchester. His silence speaks volumes, especially when the victims were largely white working-class girls and the perpetrators predominantly from Pakistani backgrounds. There are a long list of politicians, operating at local and national levels, who I could continue to name and critique. Once we start viewing British politics through this lens, where clan loyalty supersedes democratic duty, we begin to uncover a buried infrastructure of influence that spans from small towns in the UK to rural regions of Pakistan. Now are you starting to see why Labour politicians have repeatedly tried to imprison me? Why Pakistani sectarians and Islamists, shielded by Andy Burnham's now-discredited, rape gang-protecting Greater Manchester Police, have openly called for my murder? Because the moment we start asking the right questions - about clan loyalty, about democratic subversion, about institutionalised corruption - the entire facade begins to crack. This isn't just a scandal. It's a system. It’s why whistleblowers are punished, not praised. Why the media stays silent. Why justice is denied to the most vulnerable among us - white working-class girls, betrayed and forgotten. And why politicians with ties to these networks rise to power unchallenged, untouchable. But we are no longer afraid to speak. The cost of silence has become greater than the cost of truth. If you’re tired of seeing your country manipulated by those who owe their loyalty to clans, not constituents, if you want to help expose the networks, protect victims, and take back control of your democracy, then now is the time to stand with us. Want to help stop this? Learn how to fight back. Speak up. Organise. Share this. Support me. And never, ever look away again. Raja Miah MBE _________ For those new to me, I'm Raja Miah MBE. I spent six years leading a small team that exposed how Labour politicians protected Pakistani Rape Gangs and exchanged working class White girls for votes. Both politicians and police have all repeatedly tried and failed to have me imprisoned. My crime? Refusing to look the other way to the gang rape of children. My work continues despite powerful forces including the media, politicians, police and public officials all conspiring to desperately stop me and bury the truth. This includes the recent announcement of my role in The Rape Gang Inquiry team led by Rupert Lowe MP. All of my content is shared for free. I publish all the materials on my website Red Wall and the Rabble. Please subscribe. We really need more numbers. 👉 I only ask for a small contribution if you can afford to do so. Please commit to just £3 a month or £30 for the year to help me continue. 👉 Prefer a one-time contribution? 👉 👉 With no corporate backers or political sponsors, I rely solely on the support of ordinary people who understand what's at stake. No one else is going to come to our rescue. It is up to us. Please help me. Raja 🙏
0:54

There is a growing unease across Britain - one that dares not speak its name. For years, the public was told to look away, to avoid uncomfortable truths for fear of being labelled racist or xenophobic. But the evidence is mounting, and the patterns are too stark to ignore. From the cover-up of industrial-scale rape gangs to the rise of sectarian bloc voting, a dangerous new force has taken root in our institutions. It is not just about race or religion, it is about power, loyalty, and control. At the heart of it lies a deeply entrenched system imported from Pakistan: the clan. These clans, operating more like organised crime families than traditional immigrant communities, have quietly embedded themselves into the fabric of British politics and public life. And yet, few dare to speak of it. Until now. We are right to describe these networks as Pakistani Rape Clans, not simply Pakistani Rape Gangs. The term “clan” better reflects the structure, loyalty, and operational dynamics at play. As Professor Alexis Jay observed during her investigation into the Rotherham scandal, these clans often trace their roots to a specific region of Pakistan. This distinction matters, and it should shape how we think about these crimes and the systems that allow them to flourish. We need to move beyond the vague and misleading label of “Asian grooming gangs.” Precision matters, and with it comes a clearer understanding of how these clans operate - and why they evade scrutiny. 1. Clan Structures and the Limits of Western Oversight In Pakistani communities, the clan (or baradari) structure creates a web of loyalty that transcends the nuclear family model most Western institutions are built to monitor. In the UK, declarations of interest, meant to prevent conflicts of interest among politicians and public servants, typically require disclosure of ties only to close family members, such as spouses or children. But in these Pakistani clans, the network extends far beyond. First cousin marriages are common and reinforce familial bonds, while informal financial systems like “committee” (a parallel banking and loan scheme) bind families together economically. These networks create an almost impenetrable wall of loyalty and dependency. The result? These clans can operate much like mafia families. Within a single clan, you may find elected officials, police officers, civil servants, and members of organised crime - all working in a web of protection and mutual interest. Our traditional safeguards, rooted in Western definitions of family, simply aren’t equipped to detect these relationships. 2. Electoral Corruption and Clan-Controlled Power This clan dominance doesn't stop at cultural or economic networks, it extends deep into British democracy itself. Postal vote fraud and Muslim bloc voting have become powerful tools for entrenching sectarian, clan-affiliated politicians in office. In many towns, entire neighbourhoods vote not as individuals, but as a single bloc - under instructions from community leaders or mosque elders who act on behalf of the clan’s interests. Postal votes, often harvested or filled in under coercion, ensure that dissenting voices, especially women or younger voters, are silenced before they even reach the ballot box. This isn’t democracy. It’s feudalism by post, where elections become little more than coronation ceremonies for candidates who owe their loyalty not to constituents or country, but to the clan. These same politicians then sit in Parliament or local councils, not just as representatives of political parties, but as nodes in a wider network - often untouchable, protected by cultural taboos, political correctness, and accusations of racism. 3. The Implications: What Are We Missing? This raises a crucial question: Which clans do certain public figures belong to? Once we apply a clan-based lens to political activity, the picture begins to sharpen. Take Tahir Ali MP. He has previously used his parliamentary platform to advocate for blasphemy laws - echoing the values of hardline Pakistani clerics, not British liberal democracy. He has also pushed for an airport in Mirpur, a bizarre priority unless you understand the pull of clan ties and dual allegiances between the UK and a single region in Pakistan. Then there’s Shabana Mahmood MP, who this week intervened to defend the censorship of rape gang trial transcripts, objecting to public access that could expose cultural or religious motivations behind the crimes. Instead of siding with transparency and justice, the Justice Secretary sided with concealment. And @AfzalKhanMCR? Despite his position as an MP for Manchester Gorton and former Mayor of the great city, he has remained conspicuously silent on Operation Augusta - a police investigation into hundreds, if not thousands, of child sexual exploitation victims in Greater Manchester. His silence speaks volumes, especially when the victims were largely white working-class girls and the perpetrators predominantly from Pakistani backgrounds. There are a long list of politicians, operating at local and national levels, who I could continue to name and critique. Once we start viewing British politics through this lens, where clan loyalty supersedes democratic duty, we begin to uncover a buried infrastructure of influence that spans from small towns in the UK to rural regions of Pakistan. Now are you starting to see why Labour politicians have repeatedly tried to imprison me? Why Pakistani sectarians and Islamists, shielded by Andy Burnham's now-discredited, rape gang-protecting Greater Manchester Police, have openly called for my murder? Because the moment we start asking the right questions - about clan loyalty, about democratic subversion, about institutionalised corruption - the entire facade begins to crack. This isn't just a scandal. It's a system. It’s why whistleblowers are punished, not praised. Why the media stays silent. Why justice is denied to the most vulnerable among us - white working-class girls, betrayed and forgotten. And why politicians with ties to these networks rise to power unchallenged, untouchable. But we are no longer afraid to speak. The cost of silence has become greater than the cost of truth. If you’re tired of seeing your country manipulated by those who owe their loyalty to clans, not constituents, if you want to help expose the networks, protect victims, and take back control of your democracy, then now is the time to stand with us. Want to help stop this? Learn how to fight back. Speak up. Organise. Share this. Support me. And never, ever look away again. Raja Miah MBE _________ For those new to me, I'm Raja Miah MBE. I spent six years leading a small team that exposed how Labour politicians protected Pakistani Rape Gangs and exchanged working class White girls for votes. Both politicians and police have all repeatedly tried and failed to have me imprisoned. My crime? Refusing to look the other way to the gang rape of children. My work continues despite powerful forces including the media, politicians, police and public officials all conspiring to desperately stop me and bury the truth. This includes the recent announcement of my role in The Rape Gang Inquiry team led by Rupert Lowe MP. All of my content is shared for free. I publish all the materials on my website Red Wall and the Rabble. Please subscribe. We really need more numbers. 👉 I only ask for a small contribution if you can afford to do so. Please commit to just £3 a month or £30 for the year to help me continue. 👉 Prefer a one-time contribution? 👉 👉 With no corporate backers or political sponsors, I rely solely on the support of ordinary people who understand what's at stake. No one else is going to come to our rescue. It is up to us. Please help me. Raja 🙏

Raja Miah

71,784 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 “I WISH I COULD KILL 300,000,000 AMERICANS” — FBI Just Took Down Three U.S. Citizens Funding ISIS RPG and Drone Attacks on Our Troops. This Is What Happens When the DOJ Actually Does Its Job. 💥FBI BUSTS ISIS TERROR CELL ON AMERICAN SOIL — THREE U.S. CITIZENS PLOTTED RPG AND DRONE ATTACKS ON OUR TROOPS ☠️ Three radicalized American citizens — not foreign infiltrators, but homegrown traitors radicalized right here on U.S. soil — were arrested in simultaneous FBI raids across Kansas and California early Friday morning. Their mission? Fund ISIS. Buy RPGs. Send drones to kill American servicemembers. And they came terrifyingly close. 🔥 THE PLOT, UNPACKED The three jihadist wannabes — Bisaam Ghafoor (21, Leawood, KS), Elias Shamsaldeen (21, Porterville, CA), and Bereen Dzayee (25, Lakeside, CA) — spent over a year on Discord and encrypted messaging apps coordinating a multi-pronged material support operation for ISIS. Here’s what the DOJ complaint lays out: - They pledged bay’ah (allegiance) to ISIS leadership — not in private whispers, but publicly on social media. Shamsaldeen did it openly in October 2025. - They sent over $2,000 to someone they fully believed was an active ISIS operative — with Ghafoor personally handing a wax-sealed envelope containing $250 cash to an FBI undercover agent at a Kansas City mosque in May 2026, then sending another $200. - Shamsaldeen drove 90 miles to a crypto ATM at a gas station, attempting to launder his donations beyond traceability. He successfully sent $1,590 through a financial app to an FBI undercover account, believing it was buying drones to rain hell on American troops. - Ghafoor’s name was literally written in Arabic on an RPG projectile — a weapon he was told would be used to kill U.S. servicemembers overseas. His response? He celebrated it, calling it “sick” — in the enthusiastic, not disturbed, sense of the word. 🩸 THE CHILLING WORDS These aren’t allegations of abstract sympathies. The FBI has the receipts. Direct quotes from the complaint: Ghafoor: “I have always wanted to kill a female soldier by beheading.” Ghafoor: “I wish I could kill 300,000,000 Americans.” That’s not hyperbole. That’s not a kid trolling on Discord. That’s a 21-year-old American citizen fantasizing about decapitating a female U.S. service member and exterminating the entire population of the United States. Shamsaldeen: Expressed a desire to stab and injure a U.S. servicemember he encountered at a business. He also told the group that his own mother encouraged her children to grow up and kill Americans. Dzayee: Suggested U.S. Special Forces — specifically Green Berets — should be the drone targets. He also coordinated the money transfers, telling the group to call it “charity” and adding: “In my head it’s charity.” And here’s the kicker — Dzayee himself acknowledged the gravity. He and Ghafoor called what they were doing “treason” and admitted it was “bigger” than their existing fraud scheme. They knew exactly what they were. They said it out loud. And they kept going anyway. 🎯 THE STING: HOW THE FBI GOT THEM The investigation began in March 2025 with a single anonymous tip about pro-ISIS social media posts. Within months, the FBI had: - Infiltrated their Discord and messaging groups - Deployed undercover agents and confidential human sources - Tracked Shamsaldeen’s 90-mile crypto ATM pilgrimage via surveillance - Captured Ghafoor on tape, handing cash to an agent inside a mosque - Documented every pledge of allegiance, every violent fantasy, every dollar sent FBI Director Kash Patel didn’t mince words: “These subjects allegedly swore allegiance to ISIS, plotted multiple attacks, and even targeted U.S. servicemembers — but this FBI stopped them cold.” Acting AG Todd Blanche put the broader mission in perspective: “This administration has put terrorists, cartels, and gangs on notice. Today’s arrest makes clear our commitment to taking down terrorist networks — anywhere.” And the most haunting line from Blanche, which should sear itself into every American’s consciousness: “Young men in their 20s completely indoctrinated by terrorism and by terrorists and actually spending money to actually follow through on these attacks. It’s a good reminder to Americans that this fight is not over.” 🇺🇸 THE DEEPER TRUTH NOBODY WANTS TO SAY Here’s what the sanitized headlines won’t tell you: all three are U.S. citizens. Born or naturalized right here. One of them — Dzayee — appears in photos wearing a U.S. Navy sailor’s uniform, confirmed by neighbors and a former classmate. These aren’t foreign agents sneaking across the border. These are products of the American system, radicalized internally through their teachers and online echo chambers while the previous administration’s DOJ and intelligence agencies were busy hunting grandmothers at school board meetings and labeling concerned parents “domestic terrorists.” The Biden-era FBI spent years telling us the greatest terror threat was white supremacy in the heartland. Meanwhile, actual jihadist cells were forming on Discord, pledging allegiance to ISIS leadership, and wiring money for RPGs and drones — right under their noses. This bust happened because the Trump DOJ and Kash Patel’s FBI actually prioritized counterterrorism rather than treating it as an inconvenient distraction from political prosecutions. ⚖️ WHAT HAPPENS NOW All three face charges of conspiring to provide material support to a designated foreign terrorist organization — a charge that carries up to 20 years in federal prison. The case is being prosecuted in the District of Kansas by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Scott Rask and Michelle MacFarlane, alongside the National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section. They’re innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. But the complaint is devastating. The paper trail is massive. And the confessions are on tape. 📢 THE TAKEAWAY The war didn’t end when we pulled out of Afghanistan. It didn’t end when Baghdadi ate a suicide vest in a Syrian tunnel. The ideology metastasized. It’s on Discord. It’s in mosques in Kansas City. It’s in the mind of a 21-year-old in Leawood who dreams of beheading female soldiers. But here’s the difference between then and now: this administration is actually hunting them. Not lecturing us about Islamophobia. Not deflecting to “stochastic terrorism” from political opponents. Actually doing counterterrorism. This is what law and order looks like. 🇺🇸 #ISISBusted #LawAndOrder #FBI #ToddBlanche #KashPatel #NationalSecurity #MaterialSupport #HomegrownTerror #AmericaFirst #TrumpDOJ #Counterterrorism #GreenBerets #ProtectOurTroops #WakeUpAmerica #DiscordJihad #Treason #JusticeServed #StopISIS
1:11

🚨 “I WISH I COULD KILL 300,000,000 AMERICANS” — FBI Just Took Down Three U.S. Citizens Funding ISIS RPG and Drone Attacks on Our Troops. This Is What Happens When the DOJ Actually Does Its Job. 💥FBI BUSTS ISIS TERROR CELL ON AMERICAN SOIL — THREE U.S. CITIZENS PLOTTED RPG AND DRONE ATTACKS ON OUR TROOPS ☠️ Three radicalized American citizens — not foreign infiltrators, but homegrown traitors radicalized right here on U.S. soil — were arrested in simultaneous FBI raids across Kansas and California early Friday morning. Their mission? Fund ISIS. Buy RPGs. Send drones to kill American servicemembers. And they came terrifyingly close. 🔥 THE PLOT, UNPACKED The three jihadist wannabes — Bisaam Ghafoor (21, Leawood, KS), Elias Shamsaldeen (21, Porterville, CA), and Bereen Dzayee (25, Lakeside, CA) — spent over a year on Discord and encrypted messaging apps coordinating a multi-pronged material support operation for ISIS. Here’s what the DOJ complaint lays out: - They pledged bay’ah (allegiance) to ISIS leadership — not in private whispers, but publicly on social media. Shamsaldeen did it openly in October 2025. - They sent over $2,000 to someone they fully believed was an active ISIS operative — with Ghafoor personally handing a wax-sealed envelope containing $250 cash to an FBI undercover agent at a Kansas City mosque in May 2026, then sending another $200. - Shamsaldeen drove 90 miles to a crypto ATM at a gas station, attempting to launder his donations beyond traceability. He successfully sent $1,590 through a financial app to an FBI undercover account, believing it was buying drones to rain hell on American troops. - Ghafoor’s name was literally written in Arabic on an RPG projectile — a weapon he was told would be used to kill U.S. servicemembers overseas. His response? He celebrated it, calling it “sick” — in the enthusiastic, not disturbed, sense of the word. 🩸 THE CHILLING WORDS These aren’t allegations of abstract sympathies. The FBI has the receipts. Direct quotes from the complaint: Ghafoor: “I have always wanted to kill a female soldier by beheading.” Ghafoor: “I wish I could kill 300,000,000 Americans.” That’s not hyperbole. That’s not a kid trolling on Discord. That’s a 21-year-old American citizen fantasizing about decapitating a female U.S. service member and exterminating the entire population of the United States. Shamsaldeen: Expressed a desire to stab and injure a U.S. servicemember he encountered at a business. He also told the group that his own mother encouraged her children to grow up and kill Americans. Dzayee: Suggested U.S. Special Forces — specifically Green Berets — should be the drone targets. He also coordinated the money transfers, telling the group to call it “charity” and adding: “In my head it’s charity.” And here’s the kicker — Dzayee himself acknowledged the gravity. He and Ghafoor called what they were doing “treason” and admitted it was “bigger” than their existing fraud scheme. They knew exactly what they were. They said it out loud. And they kept going anyway. 🎯 THE STING: HOW THE FBI GOT THEM The investigation began in March 2025 with a single anonymous tip about pro-ISIS social media posts. Within months, the FBI had: - Infiltrated their Discord and messaging groups - Deployed undercover agents and confidential human sources - Tracked Shamsaldeen’s 90-mile crypto ATM pilgrimage via surveillance - Captured Ghafoor on tape, handing cash to an agent inside a mosque - Documented every pledge of allegiance, every violent fantasy, every dollar sent FBI Director Kash Patel didn’t mince words: “These subjects allegedly swore allegiance to ISIS, plotted multiple attacks, and even targeted U.S. servicemembers — but this FBI stopped them cold.” Acting AG Todd Blanche put the broader mission in perspective: “This administration has put terrorists, cartels, and gangs on notice. Today’s arrest makes clear our commitment to taking down terrorist networks — anywhere.” And the most haunting line from Blanche, which should sear itself into every American’s consciousness: “Young men in their 20s completely indoctrinated by terrorism and by terrorists and actually spending money to actually follow through on these attacks. It’s a good reminder to Americans that this fight is not over.” 🇺🇸 THE DEEPER TRUTH NOBODY WANTS TO SAY Here’s what the sanitized headlines won’t tell you: all three are U.S. citizens. Born or naturalized right here. One of them — Dzayee — appears in photos wearing a U.S. Navy sailor’s uniform, confirmed by neighbors and a former classmate. These aren’t foreign agents sneaking across the border. These are products of the American system, radicalized internally through their teachers and online echo chambers while the previous administration’s DOJ and intelligence agencies were busy hunting grandmothers at school board meetings and labeling concerned parents “domestic terrorists.” The Biden-era FBI spent years telling us the greatest terror threat was white supremacy in the heartland. Meanwhile, actual jihadist cells were forming on Discord, pledging allegiance to ISIS leadership, and wiring money for RPGs and drones — right under their noses. This bust happened because the Trump DOJ and Kash Patel’s FBI actually prioritized counterterrorism rather than treating it as an inconvenient distraction from political prosecutions. ⚖️ WHAT HAPPENS NOW All three face charges of conspiring to provide material support to a designated foreign terrorist organization — a charge that carries up to 20 years in federal prison. The case is being prosecuted in the District of Kansas by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Scott Rask and Michelle MacFarlane, alongside the National Security Division’s Counterterrorism Section. They’re innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. But the complaint is devastating. The paper trail is massive. And the confessions are on tape. 📢 THE TAKEAWAY The war didn’t end when we pulled out of Afghanistan. It didn’t end when Baghdadi ate a suicide vest in a Syrian tunnel. The ideology metastasized. It’s on Discord. It’s in mosques in Kansas City. It’s in the mind of a 21-year-old in Leawood who dreams of beheading female soldiers. But here’s the difference between then and now: this administration is actually hunting them. Not lecturing us about Islamophobia. Not deflecting to “stochastic terrorism” from political opponents. Actually doing counterterrorism. This is what law and order looks like. 🇺🇸 #ISISBusted #LawAndOrder #FBI #ToddBlanche #KashPatel #NationalSecurity #MaterialSupport #HomegrownTerror #AmericaFirst #TrumpDOJ #Counterterrorism #GreenBerets #ProtectOurTroops #WakeUpAmerica #DiscordJihad #Treason #JusticeServed #StopISIS

Tony Seruga

315,539 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад