Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨WHITE FRAGILITY ALERT Educational Institute Scotland (EIS) representative Lucy Kelly tells how she is indoctrinating white pupils to loathe themselves, their history and to be pro-immigration ▫️Promote non-Latin script ▫️Increase BME representation ▫️Denigrate Christianity

DownWithTheSNP's profile picture

Harekrishna #AbolishHolyrood

5,761 subscribers

22,693 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨😭 CRYBABY ALERT: LEFTIST PREDICTS CIVIL WAR, AND BLAMES WHITE PEOPLE A very emotional leftist just delivered an apocalypse monologue that sounded like a rejected Walking Dead script. According to her, America is minutes away from “extreme bloody violence,” journalists will start vanishing from their homes, and the Trump administration already has the power for a “hostile takeover.” Somewhere between the screaming and the history lecture, she paused to scold white people for not single-handedly saving democracy. “This is our fault,” she cried, as if Karen from Whole Foods could’ve stopped Civil War 2.0 by tweeting harder. She also blamed racism, misogyny, xenophobia, and apparently ghosts of Confederates haunting the suburbs. All while insisting, “This is not funny.” Spoiler alert: it was hilarious. Cheers to Tears of the Left!
3:41

🚨😭 CRYBABY ALERT: LEFTIST PREDICTS CIVIL WAR, AND BLAMES WHITE PEOPLE A very emotional leftist just delivered an apocalypse monologue that sounded like a rejected Walking Dead script. According to her, America is minutes away from “extreme bloody violence,” journalists will start vanishing from their homes, and the Trump administration already has the power for a “hostile takeover.” Somewhere between the screaming and the history lecture, she paused to scold white people for not single-handedly saving democracy. “This is our fault,” she cried, as if Karen from Whole Foods could’ve stopped Civil War 2.0 by tweeting harder. She also blamed racism, misogyny, xenophobia, and apparently ghosts of Confederates haunting the suburbs. All while insisting, “This is not funny.” Spoiler alert: it was hilarious. Cheers to Tears of the Left!

Tears of the Left

129,839 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Many of you have seen my recent posts about Victor Marx. I feel it is even more critical I bring something up that has reached new levels of concern. If you have ever been in a relationship with someone who initially seemed charming, confident, and even inspiring, but later turned your life into an emotional nightmare through manipulation, gaslighting, blame-shifting, and control, then you already understand how destructive narcissistic personality traits can be. These individuals often leave behind shattered trust, broken relationships, severe anxiety, depression, and deep emotional trauma in their wake. Now imagine that same personality type holding the highest executive office in the state of Colorado. Victor Marx, a candidate for Governor of Colorado and founder of All Things Possible Ministries (ATP), has shown now many of us a repeated pattern of concerning behaviors across multiple areas of his life. The following are just a few examples of many troubling issues that continue to surface, surprisingly on an almost daily basis: ▫️Using intense “retooling prayers” during counseling sessions to extract deeply personal and traumatic confessions from individuals, followed by the alleged disclosure of that private information when those individuals later distanced themselves. ▫️Publicly accusing former associate Corby Hall of intending to harm him and encouraging citizens to report Corby’s vehicle to authorities after Corby withdrew from their relationship. (video below) ▫️Selling his personal family home to his own nonprofit ministry for $2.95 million, despite a much lower county-assessed value, raising serious questions about financial self-dealing. ▫️A found formal letter from his own son, Shiloh Marx, addressed to the board of All Things Possible Ministries. In that letter, Shiloh accused Victor of physically abusing his daughter for many years, called his actions inexcusable, recommended that Victor immediately step down from leadership, and requested substantial financial restitution for his sister. (recovered parts below) ▫️Although his daughter later publicly recanted her earlier allegations (saying she was lying, in below video), the timing of that 'recantation' and subsequent campaign payments made to both her and her brother for “consulting” services has raised additional concerns (2026 Expenditure data from TRACER and below) These documented incidents reflect behavioral traits commonly associated with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) and spiritual abuse. Such traits often include: ▫️The exploitation of positions of trust and authority to gain intimate personal information. ▫️Using DARVO tactics — Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender — when faced with criticism or accountability. ▫️Maintaining a charismatic public image of spiritual authority and personal redemption while exhibiting controlling or harmful behavior in private. ▫️Demonstrating a pattern of punishing those who question or pull away from him. ▫️Prioritizing personal image, control, and financial benefit over ethical boundaries and the well-being of others. Colorado faces significant challenges. Placing someone with this pattern of behavior in the Governor’s office carries substantial risks to the integrity of leadership and public trust. This is not about politics as usual. When multiple credible concerns accumulate around a candidate for such a powerful office, the public has both the right and the responsibility to examine them closely. SOMETHING IS SERIOUSLY WRONG WITH MARX AND HIS FAMILY. None of this is even remotely normal. Isn't anyone else's spidey-sense going off? Please tell me I'm not alone!
4:11

Many of you have seen my recent posts about Victor Marx. I feel it is even more critical I bring something up that has reached new levels of concern. If you have ever been in a relationship with someone who initially seemed charming, confident, and even inspiring, but later turned your life into an emotional nightmare through manipulation, gaslighting, blame-shifting, and control, then you already understand how destructive narcissistic personality traits can be. These individuals often leave behind shattered trust, broken relationships, severe anxiety, depression, and deep emotional trauma in their wake. Now imagine that same personality type holding the highest executive office in the state of Colorado. Victor Marx, a candidate for Governor of Colorado and founder of All Things Possible Ministries (ATP), has shown now many of us a repeated pattern of concerning behaviors across multiple areas of his life. The following are just a few examples of many troubling issues that continue to surface, surprisingly on an almost daily basis: ▫️Using intense “retooling prayers” during counseling sessions to extract deeply personal and traumatic confessions from individuals, followed by the alleged disclosure of that private information when those individuals later distanced themselves. ▫️Publicly accusing former associate Corby Hall of intending to harm him and encouraging citizens to report Corby’s vehicle to authorities after Corby withdrew from their relationship. (video below) ▫️Selling his personal family home to his own nonprofit ministry for $2.95 million, despite a much lower county-assessed value, raising serious questions about financial self-dealing. ▫️A found formal letter from his own son, Shiloh Marx, addressed to the board of All Things Possible Ministries. In that letter, Shiloh accused Victor of physically abusing his daughter for many years, called his actions inexcusable, recommended that Victor immediately step down from leadership, and requested substantial financial restitution for his sister. (recovered parts below) ▫️Although his daughter later publicly recanted her earlier allegations (saying she was lying, in below video), the timing of that 'recantation' and subsequent campaign payments made to both her and her brother for “consulting” services has raised additional concerns (2026 Expenditure data from TRACER and below) These documented incidents reflect behavioral traits commonly associated with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) and spiritual abuse. Such traits often include: ▫️The exploitation of positions of trust and authority to gain intimate personal information. ▫️Using DARVO tactics — Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender — when faced with criticism or accountability. ▫️Maintaining a charismatic public image of spiritual authority and personal redemption while exhibiting controlling or harmful behavior in private. ▫️Demonstrating a pattern of punishing those who question or pull away from him. ▫️Prioritizing personal image, control, and financial benefit over ethical boundaries and the well-being of others. Colorado faces significant challenges. Placing someone with this pattern of behavior in the Governor’s office carries substantial risks to the integrity of leadership and public trust. This is not about politics as usual. When multiple credible concerns accumulate around a candidate for such a powerful office, the public has both the right and the responsibility to examine them closely. SOMETHING IS SERIOUSLY WRONG WITH MARX AND HIS FAMILY. None of this is even remotely normal. Isn't anyone else's spidey-sense going off? Please tell me I'm not alone!

Mark Cook

17,428 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Student sounds alarm, says professor conducted 'ICE drill' during class A student at the University of Minnesota tells Alpha News she had to take part in what her professor called an "'ICE drill" during class. The student said it was meant to teach students how to respond if ICE ever came to the class—and how white students needed to use their bodies to "cover" and "shield" other students who may be likely targets of immigration enforcement. The student, who initially did not want to be anonymous but did so to protect family and friends, said that as a future educator, “I would never ever instruct my own students to put their own safety on the line.” The university told Alpha News it is aware of the situation and conducting a thorough review.
6:22

Student sounds alarm, says professor conducted 'ICE drill' during class A student at the University of Minnesota tells Alpha News she had to take part in what her professor called an "'ICE drill" during class. The student said it was meant to teach students how to respond if ICE ever came to the class—and how white students needed to use their bodies to "cover" and "shield" other students who may be likely targets of immigration enforcement. The student, who initially did not want to be anonymous but did so to protect family and friends, said that as a future educator, “I would never ever instruct my own students to put their own safety on the line.” The university told Alpha News it is aware of the situation and conducting a thorough review.

Alpha News

52,429 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨😭CRYBABY ALERT: JASMINE CROCKETT TELLS TEXANS “WE AIN’T NO COLONIZAS” IN UNHINGED RANT Rep. Jasmine Crockett hit the stage at a concert to campaign for the Senate, and left grammar, unity, and coherence in the parking lot. She told the crowd “we ain’t no colonizas,” because apparently speaking English properly is now white supremacy. Then she declared “we are more than,” flipping the script into race-first politics that would’ve ended any white politician’s career in five seconds flat. This wasn’t a political speech; it was a cringe mixtape of broken sentences, ghetto slang, and divisive rhetoric dressed up as empowerment. Jasmine’s pitch? A future where grammar’s optional, race is everything, and America’s promise depends on your skin tone. Grab the popcorn; Senate campaigns now come with mispronounced history lessons only Crockett voters understand. Cheers to Tears of the Left!
2:11

🚨😭CRYBABY ALERT: JASMINE CROCKETT TELLS TEXANS “WE AIN’T NO COLONIZAS” IN UNHINGED RANT Rep. Jasmine Crockett hit the stage at a concert to campaign for the Senate, and left grammar, unity, and coherence in the parking lot. She told the crowd “we ain’t no colonizas,” because apparently speaking English properly is now white supremacy. Then she declared “we are more than,” flipping the script into race-first politics that would’ve ended any white politician’s career in five seconds flat. This wasn’t a political speech; it was a cringe mixtape of broken sentences, ghetto slang, and divisive rhetoric dressed up as empowerment. Jasmine’s pitch? A future where grammar’s optional, race is everything, and America’s promise depends on your skin tone. Grab the popcorn; Senate campaigns now come with mispronounced history lessons only Crockett voters understand. Cheers to Tears of the Left!

Tears of the Left

80,856 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨😭CRYBABY ALERT: CREEPY REP. STALKER SAYS BEING WHITE IS BAD, KIDS SHOULD FEEL BAD TOO Kentucky's Rep. Sarah Stalker just popped up in a “racial equality” meeting looking like the Snow White witch wants to pay reparations. She kicked things off with, “I don’t feel good about being white every day.” Then doubled down: “If I was a white man, I would be functioning from a point of even greater privilege.” Stalker's proposal? Teach kids how to stew over their skin color like white guilt is emotional growth. She even suggests it’s a “missed opportunity” if children don't receive DEI training before high school. According to Miss creepy, drive, talent, and agreeableness don't matter; we're all racial monkeys walking around with oppression sticks someone has to take away. This isn’t justice; it’s racial determinism with lipstick on. Telling people they're doomed by their skin color doesn’t fight racism; it feeds it. This wasn't about lifting anyone up. It’s about power, pity, and preaching from a pedestal of self-loathing. Cheers to Tears of the Left!
1:00

🚨😭CRYBABY ALERT: CREEPY REP. STALKER SAYS BEING WHITE IS BAD, KIDS SHOULD FEEL BAD TOO Kentucky's Rep. Sarah Stalker just popped up in a “racial equality” meeting looking like the Snow White witch wants to pay reparations. She kicked things off with, “I don’t feel good about being white every day.” Then doubled down: “If I was a white man, I would be functioning from a point of even greater privilege.” Stalker's proposal? Teach kids how to stew over their skin color like white guilt is emotional growth. She even suggests it’s a “missed opportunity” if children don't receive DEI training before high school. According to Miss creepy, drive, talent, and agreeableness don't matter; we're all racial monkeys walking around with oppression sticks someone has to take away. This isn’t justice; it’s racial determinism with lipstick on. Telling people they're doomed by their skin color doesn’t fight racism; it feeds it. This wasn't about lifting anyone up. It’s about power, pity, and preaching from a pedestal of self-loathing. Cheers to Tears of the Left!

Tears of the Left

32,046 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸 TRUMP: ILHAN OMAR COMES FROM CHAOS AND WANTS TO LECTURE AMERICA When asked about reports alleging Rep. Omar’s past immigration fraud, Trump unleashed a fiery rebuke, accusing her of constant criticism and hypocrisy: “She’s very bad for our country. All she does is complain. Complain, complain. She comes out of a country where they have no government, no military, no police, they got no nothing. They don’t have a country. They run around killing each other. And then she comes over here and tells the United States how it should be run. We don’t want to hear from her. I don’t want to hear from her.” Source: The White House
0:56

🚨🇺🇸 TRUMP: ILHAN OMAR COMES FROM CHAOS AND WANTS TO LECTURE AMERICA When asked about reports alleging Rep. Omar’s past immigration fraud, Trump unleashed a fiery rebuke, accusing her of constant criticism and hypocrisy: “She’s very bad for our country. All she does is complain. Complain, complain. She comes out of a country where they have no government, no military, no police, they got no nothing. They don’t have a country. They run around killing each other. And then she comes over here and tells the United States how it should be run. We don’t want to hear from her. I don’t want to hear from her.” Source: The White House

Mario Nawfal

31,713 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 ALERT! ALERT! BREAKING! ALERT! ALERT! 🚨 This is going to confuse the hell out of FAGA. Their star witness, Mitch Snow, claims it was Joe Kent, while holding the position of Director of the National CounterTerrorism Center (NCTC), who vetted him for Candace Owens. Then Mitch says: “Seems like a lot of White Hats that are in the know trust him (Joe Kent).” And that is where it gets hilarious. Because FAGA has spent all this time screaming that White Hats and Q are a psyop. So what is Mitch implying here? That Candace Owens, Joe Kent, Tucker Carlson, and the rest of that circle are the White Hats now? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 That is the play. They are trying to bait the more gullible side of the Q movement into believing these anti-Trump personalities are somehow the “good guys,” so the truth community will start backing and amplifying rhetoric designed to undermine President Trump from the inside. That alone tells you something important: they are losing ground with the real Q community. So now they need a new angle. A baited “unity” play. A rebrand. A soft infiltration move. And just like always, the useful idiots and the grifters will be the first to fall for it. So now, the comedy part, the same clowns who have spent all this time screaming that White Hats and Q are a psyop, have a dilemma they created for themselves: 1. Admit Mitch Snow is a lying grifter, which destroys the credibility they tried so hard to build around him to attack Erika Kirk and TPUSA. or 2. Support Mitch Snow as authentic, which means acknowledging that White Hats and Q exist. Either way, they lose. Enjoy the show. Video below.
2:59

🚨 ALERT! ALERT! BREAKING! ALERT! ALERT! 🚨 This is going to confuse the hell out of FAGA. Their star witness, Mitch Snow, claims it was Joe Kent, while holding the position of Director of the National CounterTerrorism Center (NCTC), who vetted him for Candace Owens. Then Mitch says: “Seems like a lot of White Hats that are in the know trust him (Joe Kent).” And that is where it gets hilarious. Because FAGA has spent all this time screaming that White Hats and Q are a psyop. So what is Mitch implying here? That Candace Owens, Joe Kent, Tucker Carlson, and the rest of that circle are the White Hats now? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 That is the play. They are trying to bait the more gullible side of the Q movement into believing these anti-Trump personalities are somehow the “good guys,” so the truth community will start backing and amplifying rhetoric designed to undermine President Trump from the inside. That alone tells you something important: they are losing ground with the real Q community. So now they need a new angle. A baited “unity” play. A rebrand. A soft infiltration move. And just like always, the useful idiots and the grifters will be the first to fall for it. So now, the comedy part, the same clowns who have spent all this time screaming that White Hats and Q are a psyop, have a dilemma they created for themselves: 1. Admit Mitch Snow is a lying grifter, which destroys the credibility they tried so hard to build around him to attack Erika Kirk and TPUSA. or 2. Support Mitch Snow as authentic, which means acknowledging that White Hats and Q exist. Either way, they lose. Enjoy the show. Video below.

ALPHAWARRIOR

42,116 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

THIS IS SCARY Yesterday, a group of people in Scotland protested a new hate speech law. "The irony of this hateful, spiteful law coming into play on April's Fools Day..." said one of the protesters. "Criminalizing free speech in this country is absolutely disgraceful." While I was happy to see the protest, I am deeply alarmed that the Scottish government passed the law in the first place. J.K. Rowling rightly wrote on X that the law gives the government the power to arrest people who refuse to call male rapists and murderers “women” and “she” and “her” if that’s what those men demand. The Hate Crime and Public Order Act of 2021 creates a new crime for "stirring up hatred," including related to trans identity. People can be arrested for things they say in the privacy of their own home. They can be arrested for simply being "insulting." And prosecutors need only prove your stirring up of hatred was "likely" not "intended." You might think this all has nothing to do with you. You don’t live in Scotland. But it has everything to do with you. What you say online could be held as criminal hate speech in Scotland, simply by somebody reading it there. And it’s not just Scotland. In the US, pro-censorship forces hope a Supreme Court victory will let them once again ramp up censorship demands by the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI. EU officials are putting in place a sweeping online censorship system that far exceeds in power and scope anything attempted under Communism or fascism. And last week, European political leaders weaponized their intelligence and security agencies in order to smear everyone from German farmers to conservative politicians as “Russia-linked.” And yet the United States and EU governments pump far more money than Russia into “non-governmental” organizations like the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, the Aspen Institute, and the Atlantic Council to wage influence campaigns aimed at smearing ordinary farmers and truckers as “Russian-linked” and “far-right,” and influencing elections. To understand how ridiculous and totalitarian the EU’s focus on “foreign manipulation” is, consider the fact that, during the Cold War, the US government’s Central Intelligence Agency not only allowed Americans to read Soviet newspapers but actually translated them into English and sent them to thousands of libraries across the United States. Just think about it: do Europeans really need Russians, “Russia-linked” individuals, or “individuals echoing Moscow” to be angry about high energy prices and uncontrolled immigration? The entire “Russia influence” narrative coming from European politicians and intelligence agencies rests upon the monstrous insult that Europeans would be compliant were it not for Russians sowing discontent. This is an old political trick: characterize your enemies as foreigners. It’s also a trick of totalitarians. What’s driving all of this? Part of it is that EU politicians are trying to influence the June elections by demonizing their political opponents as puppets of Russia. But another part of it appears to be driven by genuine hatred. Just listen to Scotland First Minister Humza Yousaf condemning the Scottish government on racial terms. “Why are we so surprised by the most senior positions in Scotland filled by those who are white?" he said. "Lord President — white. Every high court judge — white!” Humza suggests that the reason for all of this is because Scottish people are racist. But the real reason is that 95% of Scottish people are white. The fact that Humza, a nonwhite Muslim, is the highest-ranking Scottish politician is a sign of how non-racist the Scottish people are. For Humza to reach the top political job in Scotland and insist that the reason he’s so rare is because the Scottish people are racist is itself hateful, and pathological. The bad news is that the censors are on the offensive and we are on the defensive. In the US, Europe, Scotland, Germany, Ireland, Canada, and Brazil, an alliance of government agencies, government-funded think tanks, and corporate media are demanding more censorship, whether through laws like the one enacted in Scotland or through executive actions by agencies like the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and FBI. The good news is we are starting to find our footing. We have been proud to publish investigations that have uncovered government disinformation and censorship demands in Germany, the Czech Republic, Ireland, Canada, and Brazil. These investigations reveal the same cast of characters, including intelligence and security agencies, mainstream news media, and ostensibly “non-governmental” organizations that happen to be heavily funded by governments. As importantly, we can expose the hatred behind the hate speech policies, and continue to point out that the solution to hate speech is free speech, not censorship. The way to counter hate is to do what Darryl Davis did, which was persuade KKK members to see him as a human being, and to give up their white robes. Davis will be the first person to tell you that he couldn’t have done his work with censorship, only with freedom of speech. There’s much we need to do...
5:30

THIS IS SCARY Yesterday, a group of people in Scotland protested a new hate speech law. "The irony of this hateful, spiteful law coming into play on April's Fools Day..." said one of the protesters. "Criminalizing free speech in this country is absolutely disgraceful." While I was happy to see the protest, I am deeply alarmed that the Scottish government passed the law in the first place. J.K. Rowling rightly wrote on X that the law gives the government the power to arrest people who refuse to call male rapists and murderers “women” and “she” and “her” if that’s what those men demand. The Hate Crime and Public Order Act of 2021 creates a new crime for "stirring up hatred," including related to trans identity. People can be arrested for things they say in the privacy of their own home. They can be arrested for simply being "insulting." And prosecutors need only prove your stirring up of hatred was "likely" not "intended." You might think this all has nothing to do with you. You don’t live in Scotland. But it has everything to do with you. What you say online could be held as criminal hate speech in Scotland, simply by somebody reading it there. And it’s not just Scotland. In the US, pro-censorship forces hope a Supreme Court victory will let them once again ramp up censorship demands by the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI. EU officials are putting in place a sweeping online censorship system that far exceeds in power and scope anything attempted under Communism or fascism. And last week, European political leaders weaponized their intelligence and security agencies in order to smear everyone from German farmers to conservative politicians as “Russia-linked.” And yet the United States and EU governments pump far more money than Russia into “non-governmental” organizations like the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, the Aspen Institute, and the Atlantic Council to wage influence campaigns aimed at smearing ordinary farmers and truckers as “Russian-linked” and “far-right,” and influencing elections. To understand how ridiculous and totalitarian the EU’s focus on “foreign manipulation” is, consider the fact that, during the Cold War, the US government’s Central Intelligence Agency not only allowed Americans to read Soviet newspapers but actually translated them into English and sent them to thousands of libraries across the United States. Just think about it: do Europeans really need Russians, “Russia-linked” individuals, or “individuals echoing Moscow” to be angry about high energy prices and uncontrolled immigration? The entire “Russia influence” narrative coming from European politicians and intelligence agencies rests upon the monstrous insult that Europeans would be compliant were it not for Russians sowing discontent. This is an old political trick: characterize your enemies as foreigners. It’s also a trick of totalitarians. What’s driving all of this? Part of it is that EU politicians are trying to influence the June elections by demonizing their political opponents as puppets of Russia. But another part of it appears to be driven by genuine hatred. Just listen to Scotland First Minister Humza Yousaf condemning the Scottish government on racial terms. “Why are we so surprised by the most senior positions in Scotland filled by those who are white?" he said. "Lord President — white. Every high court judge — white!” Humza suggests that the reason for all of this is because Scottish people are racist. But the real reason is that 95% of Scottish people are white. The fact that Humza, a nonwhite Muslim, is the highest-ranking Scottish politician is a sign of how non-racist the Scottish people are. For Humza to reach the top political job in Scotland and insist that the reason he’s so rare is because the Scottish people are racist is itself hateful, and pathological. The bad news is that the censors are on the offensive and we are on the defensive. In the US, Europe, Scotland, Germany, Ireland, Canada, and Brazil, an alliance of government agencies, government-funded think tanks, and corporate media are demanding more censorship, whether through laws like the one enacted in Scotland or through executive actions by agencies like the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and FBI. The good news is we are starting to find our footing. We have been proud to publish investigations that have uncovered government disinformation and censorship demands in Germany, the Czech Republic, Ireland, Canada, and Brazil. These investigations reveal the same cast of characters, including intelligence and security agencies, mainstream news media, and ostensibly “non-governmental” organizations that happen to be heavily funded by governments. As importantly, we can expose the hatred behind the hate speech policies, and continue to point out that the solution to hate speech is free speech, not censorship. The way to counter hate is to do what Darryl Davis did, which was persuade KKK members to see him as a human being, and to give up their white robes. Davis will be the first person to tell you that he couldn’t have done his work with censorship, only with freedom of speech. There’s much we need to do...

Michael Shellenberger

625,978 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Since this bigot, cosplaying as a preacher, came for my denomination, the Church Of God In Christ, my leader, Bishop J. Drew Sheard, and the Black church in general, let me offer this saved, sanctified, Holy Ghost filled clap back to his racist, hypocritical temper tantrum about Black people not supporting Donald Trump. The overwhelming support of white evangelicals for Trump exposes profound hypocrisy within their political and religious alignment. Trump’s life, actions, and policies are antithetical to the values they profess as Christians. Evangelicals claim to uphold the sanctity of marriage, yet they support a man who has been married three times, each marred by infidelity. They preach family values while endorsing someone who paid porn stars and has been accused of sexual misconduct by over two dozen women. The Bible condemns lying, yet Donald Trump is a documented pathological liar, spreading falsehoods with impunity. Furthermore, Trump’s policies on immigration and refugees fly in the face of biblical teachings to care for the stranger and the oppressed. White evangelicals, however, have largely backed his xenophobic agenda, turning a blind eye to the suffering of immigrants and asylum seekers. The Bible calls believers to take care of the poor and marginalized, but evangelicals champion policies that cut social safety nets and disproportionately harm the most vulnerable. Their hypocrisy is not new. Historically, white evangelicals have misused the Bible to justify heinous acts. They were key supporters of slavery, using scripture to rationalize the subjugation, rape, and murder of Black people. Their legacy includes defending segregation, opposing civil rights, and today, embracing a political agenda that harms the poor, immigrants, Black people, and other non white people. White evangelical support for Trump is simply the latest chapter in their long history of aligning with what the Bible itself calls wickedness. They have a history of supporting violence, exploitation, rape, murder, theft, and colonization, all while claiming to be followers of Christ. Whit evangelicals have justified these acts through a twisted interpretation of scripture, portraying violent subjugation as ordained by God. The practice of buck breaking—where enslaved Black men were sexually assaulted by white slaveholders to break their spirit—was another horrifying act that many evangelicals tacitly endorsed. Despite their vocal condemnation of homosexuality, they ignored the rampant sexual abuse and exploitation committed by white men in these horrific acts. White evangelicals also supported the genocide and displacement of Indigenous people, rationalizing the theft of land as part of a divine mandate. The so-called “Manifest Destiny” was framed as God’s will, with no regard for the Indigenous lives destroyed in the process. They stood behind policies that sanctioned murder and violence to fulfill this colonial ambition, all while calling themselves defenders of Christian values. Today, this legacy of supporting violence and oppression persists in their support for preemptive strikes and military interventions that result in the deaths of civilians around the world. In Gaza, they stand behind the indiscriminate bombing and killing of Palestinian civilians, justifying it under the guise of political necessity or even biblical prophecy. Their alignment with these actions mirrors their historical support for the murder of enslaved Black people, the theft of Indigenous land, and the sexual violence of buck breaking. The evangelical church’s selective morality—opposing certain sins like abortion or homosexuality while embracing mass violence, exploitation, and white supremacy—reveals a deep hypocrisy and exposes the fact that their allegiance is to power and racial domination, not to the gospel they claim to follow. 🎤
3:31

Since this bigot, cosplaying as a preacher, came for my denomination, the Church Of God In Christ, my leader, Bishop J. Drew Sheard, and the Black church in general, let me offer this saved, sanctified, Holy Ghost filled clap back to his racist, hypocritical temper tantrum about Black people not supporting Donald Trump. The overwhelming support of white evangelicals for Trump exposes profound hypocrisy within their political and religious alignment. Trump’s life, actions, and policies are antithetical to the values they profess as Christians. Evangelicals claim to uphold the sanctity of marriage, yet they support a man who has been married three times, each marred by infidelity. They preach family values while endorsing someone who paid porn stars and has been accused of sexual misconduct by over two dozen women. The Bible condemns lying, yet Donald Trump is a documented pathological liar, spreading falsehoods with impunity. Furthermore, Trump’s policies on immigration and refugees fly in the face of biblical teachings to care for the stranger and the oppressed. White evangelicals, however, have largely backed his xenophobic agenda, turning a blind eye to the suffering of immigrants and asylum seekers. The Bible calls believers to take care of the poor and marginalized, but evangelicals champion policies that cut social safety nets and disproportionately harm the most vulnerable. Their hypocrisy is not new. Historically, white evangelicals have misused the Bible to justify heinous acts. They were key supporters of slavery, using scripture to rationalize the subjugation, rape, and murder of Black people. Their legacy includes defending segregation, opposing civil rights, and today, embracing a political agenda that harms the poor, immigrants, Black people, and other non white people. White evangelical support for Trump is simply the latest chapter in their long history of aligning with what the Bible itself calls wickedness. They have a history of supporting violence, exploitation, rape, murder, theft, and colonization, all while claiming to be followers of Christ. Whit evangelicals have justified these acts through a twisted interpretation of scripture, portraying violent subjugation as ordained by God. The practice of buck breaking—where enslaved Black men were sexually assaulted by white slaveholders to break their spirit—was another horrifying act that many evangelicals tacitly endorsed. Despite their vocal condemnation of homosexuality, they ignored the rampant sexual abuse and exploitation committed by white men in these horrific acts. White evangelicals also supported the genocide and displacement of Indigenous people, rationalizing the theft of land as part of a divine mandate. The so-called “Manifest Destiny” was framed as God’s will, with no regard for the Indigenous lives destroyed in the process. They stood behind policies that sanctioned murder and violence to fulfill this colonial ambition, all while calling themselves defenders of Christian values. Today, this legacy of supporting violence and oppression persists in their support for preemptive strikes and military interventions that result in the deaths of civilians around the world. In Gaza, they stand behind the indiscriminate bombing and killing of Palestinian civilians, justifying it under the guise of political necessity or even biblical prophecy. Their alignment with these actions mirrors their historical support for the murder of enslaved Black people, the theft of Indigenous land, and the sexual violence of buck breaking. The evangelical church’s selective morality—opposing certain sins like abortion or homosexuality while embracing mass violence, exploitation, and white supremacy—reveals a deep hypocrisy and exposes the fact that their allegiance is to power and racial domination, not to the gospel they claim to follow. 🎤

Bishop Talbert Swan

379,025 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Donald Trump’s Spiritual Team •Paula White •Normand Vincent Peale •Kenneth Copeland •Eitan Yardeni His current spiritual advisor, “Paula Michelle Purr” who now goes by the name of Paula White CAIN is a literal demon. She DEMANDED all “Satanic Pregnancies” be miscarried. A Pastor calling for miscarriages —how interesting. Has been publicly endorsed by the Church of Satan… Jerusalem Post: Paula White: “Christians must learn from Jews, not convert them”. Rev. Paula White CAIN speaks with participants at Young Women's Leadership Summit 202. “I believe President Trump was God's answer to so many prayers, she said, and he was and is appointed by God to lead America.” Donald Trump’s fav pastor growing up, Normand Vincent Peale, was a a 33rd degree Freemason and false teacher. Norman Vincent Peale popularized “positive thinking,” blending Christian Science ideas with psychology and biblical language. His teachings emphasized that thoughts are causative—able to shape health, destiny, and success. He advocated “imaging,” a practice of visualizing goals until they manifest, paired with faith and gratitude for outcomes before they occur. As a minister, Peale denied core Christian doctrines. He described God as “vitality” and “energy” rather than a personal being and claimed, “It’s not necessary to be born again… Christ is one of the ways.” Critics like theologian John Krumm observed that Peale shifted focus from God’s sovereignty to self-centered ambition. While some, like Billy Graham, praised him, Peale’s message replaced the gospel with self-help, undermining biblical truth. The core of all luciferian systems, the carrot of liberation, self realization and godhood. The very first lies ever told. What do you know about Donald Trump’s Kabbalah teacher, Eitan Yardeni? How does studying this craft shape or influence one’s claim to Christianity? Remember when Trump dodged the question of repentance—why avoid it with such fervour? And then there’s Kenneth Copeland, a televangelist whose extravagant lifestyle and distorted doctrines speak for themselves. So, what does this web of advisors reveal about Trump’s faith and the “Christianity” he claims to represent? For believers, does this align with the gospel of Jesus Christ—or does it undermine it entirely? For non-believers: If this is the Christianity Trump embodies, does it make the faith seem authentic—or just another tool for power and control?
0:14

Donald Trump’s Spiritual Team •Paula White •Normand Vincent Peale •Kenneth Copeland •Eitan Yardeni His current spiritual advisor, “Paula Michelle Purr” who now goes by the name of Paula White CAIN is a literal demon. She DEMANDED all “Satanic Pregnancies” be miscarried. A Pastor calling for miscarriages —how interesting. Has been publicly endorsed by the Church of Satan… Jerusalem Post: Paula White: “Christians must learn from Jews, not convert them”. Rev. Paula White CAIN speaks with participants at Young Women's Leadership Summit 202. “I believe President Trump was God's answer to so many prayers, she said, and he was and is appointed by God to lead America.” Donald Trump’s fav pastor growing up, Normand Vincent Peale, was a a 33rd degree Freemason and false teacher. Norman Vincent Peale popularized “positive thinking,” blending Christian Science ideas with psychology and biblical language. His teachings emphasized that thoughts are causative—able to shape health, destiny, and success. He advocated “imaging,” a practice of visualizing goals until they manifest, paired with faith and gratitude for outcomes before they occur. As a minister, Peale denied core Christian doctrines. He described God as “vitality” and “energy” rather than a personal being and claimed, “It’s not necessary to be born again… Christ is one of the ways.” Critics like theologian John Krumm observed that Peale shifted focus from God’s sovereignty to self-centered ambition. While some, like Billy Graham, praised him, Peale’s message replaced the gospel with self-help, undermining biblical truth. The core of all luciferian systems, the carrot of liberation, self realization and godhood. The very first lies ever told. What do you know about Donald Trump’s Kabbalah teacher, Eitan Yardeni? How does studying this craft shape or influence one’s claim to Christianity? Remember when Trump dodged the question of repentance—why avoid it with such fervour? And then there’s Kenneth Copeland, a televangelist whose extravagant lifestyle and distorted doctrines speak for themselves. So, what does this web of advisors reveal about Trump’s faith and the “Christianity” he claims to represent? For believers, does this align with the gospel of Jesus Christ—or does it undermine it entirely? For non-believers: If this is the Christianity Trump embodies, does it make the faith seem authentic—or just another tool for power and control?

Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)

90,129 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

WATCH: 🚨 Marjorie Taylor Greene EXPOSED FOR FLIP FLOPPING ON CONCERN FOR SHARIA LAW AND ISLAMIC TAKEOVER OF AMERICA 🚨 Marjorie Taylor Greene just did an interview with the Pro-Islamic Drop Site and she was asked if people are worried about Sharia Law and if it was an issue of concern. She claimed without evidence of course, that people are getting paid by Brad Parscale with Israeli money to convince Americans that they should worry about the rise of Islam and Sharia. Then she said it’s absurd to worry about these issues and they aren’t real issues. Who is getting paid exactly? Was MTG paid to flip flop on what she said 5 months ago? Here’s a video of MTG from June of this year warning about the rise of Sharia law and how it would be more present in America if Zohran Kwame Mamdani won. She said an Islamic takeover of America is an issue Americans should worry about. Now, she’s gaslighting Amercians since the Islamic movement and Fake News media keeps inviting her on TV to bash President Trump. This is just further evidence MTG is a liar, a sellout, and she will say anything to be accepted by the Islamists and Radical left. What changed Marjorie? How do you go from saying Sharia Law is a threat in June of 2025, to now gaslighting Americans by claiming it’s not really a threat and that people who claim Sharia is a threat are getting paid by Israel? I told you that you would soon be seeing Israel and Jew obsessed pundits and lawmakers promote Sharia Law as harmless and pretend like there isn’t an Islamic threat. They want to convince you Israel and Jews are the biggest threats facing America so that you are completely distracted to the reality that hundreds of Islamic jihadist candidates are running for office across America on communist and pro-Sharia platforms. The real question is: who is paying MTG to white wash the threat of Sharia and Islam in America? See video below 👇🏻
3:56

WATCH: 🚨 Marjorie Taylor Greene EXPOSED FOR FLIP FLOPPING ON CONCERN FOR SHARIA LAW AND ISLAMIC TAKEOVER OF AMERICA 🚨 Marjorie Taylor Greene just did an interview with the Pro-Islamic Drop Site and she was asked if people are worried about Sharia Law and if it was an issue of concern. She claimed without evidence of course, that people are getting paid by Brad Parscale with Israeli money to convince Americans that they should worry about the rise of Islam and Sharia. Then she said it’s absurd to worry about these issues and they aren’t real issues. Who is getting paid exactly? Was MTG paid to flip flop on what she said 5 months ago? Here’s a video of MTG from June of this year warning about the rise of Sharia law and how it would be more present in America if Zohran Kwame Mamdani won. She said an Islamic takeover of America is an issue Americans should worry about. Now, she’s gaslighting Amercians since the Islamic movement and Fake News media keeps inviting her on TV to bash President Trump. This is just further evidence MTG is a liar, a sellout, and she will say anything to be accepted by the Islamists and Radical left. What changed Marjorie? How do you go from saying Sharia Law is a threat in June of 2025, to now gaslighting Americans by claiming it’s not really a threat and that people who claim Sharia is a threat are getting paid by Israel? I told you that you would soon be seeing Israel and Jew obsessed pundits and lawmakers promote Sharia Law as harmless and pretend like there isn’t an Islamic threat. They want to convince you Israel and Jews are the biggest threats facing America so that you are completely distracted to the reality that hundreds of Islamic jihadist candidates are running for office across America on communist and pro-Sharia platforms. The real question is: who is paying MTG to white wash the threat of Sharia and Islam in America? See video below 👇🏻

Laura Loomer

632,696 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨 NOW: Ghetto Rep. Jasmine Crockett just went on a DERANGED TIRADE in a total embarrassment She can't leave Congress soon ENOUGH! "We haven't had ONE HEARING on white supremacy!" 🤡 "This is the same party that wants to drag us back to the Jim Crow era. Some say that there aren't poll taxes and I guess it's because they're not listing the amount of money, but when you tell somebody that they've got to go and pay for something, say like a passport that costs over a hundred dollars in order to be able to vote, that looks like a poll tax to me!" "Some of y'all need to read up on your history books, the very same ones that the Republicans have decided that people should not hear about because you don't want real history taught in our schools!" "Because you're afraid that it's going to hurt people's feelings to know that their ancestors were so savage that they would enslave black folk!" "You don't want them to understand why the 14th Amendment mattered then and it matters today. You don't want them to understand that when they draw these racist lines and tell black folk that they shouldn't have representation in this country that it is against the Constitution."
1:35

🚨 NOW: Ghetto Rep. Jasmine Crockett just went on a DERANGED TIRADE in a total embarrassment She can't leave Congress soon ENOUGH! "We haven't had ONE HEARING on white supremacy!" 🤡 "This is the same party that wants to drag us back to the Jim Crow era. Some say that there aren't poll taxes and I guess it's because they're not listing the amount of money, but when you tell somebody that they've got to go and pay for something, say like a passport that costs over a hundred dollars in order to be able to vote, that looks like a poll tax to me!" "Some of y'all need to read up on your history books, the very same ones that the Republicans have decided that people should not hear about because you don't want real history taught in our schools!" "Because you're afraid that it's going to hurt people's feelings to know that their ancestors were so savage that they would enslave black folk!" "You don't want them to understand why the 14th Amendment mattered then and it matters today. You don't want them to understand that when they draw these racist lines and tell black folk that they shouldn't have representation in this country that it is against the Constitution."

Eric Daugherty

114,938 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I told you so. During the campaign between Donald Trump and Joe Biden, people would ask me how I could support or endorse Donald J Trump as president. Of course those questions are rooted in naivety and emotion. When you vote for president, you’re not voting for a pastor, priest, or profit. You’re voting for someone who will run the country according to the Constitution. So, my response to people has always been and still is the same. You may or may not like the individual that is running for president or mayor or governor, but who comes with them in their rise to power is an important consideration. With President Trump, we knew in advance that if successful, he would assemble literally the greatest cabinet that the United States has ever had. The proof of that is revealed in the video provided here. I enjoy an insight source within the White House, who tells me that they have never before seen more prayer meetings and more Bible studies, both in the White House and in the Republican Congress, than at any other time in recorded American history. The only people who would be upset with that would be atheists, communists, or non-Americans. There’s a good lesson to be learned here. None of us are perfect, but we would be wise to surround ourselves with people who, together, make a strong team.
1:03

I told you so. During the campaign between Donald Trump and Joe Biden, people would ask me how I could support or endorse Donald J Trump as president. Of course those questions are rooted in naivety and emotion. When you vote for president, you’re not voting for a pastor, priest, or profit. You’re voting for someone who will run the country according to the Constitution. So, my response to people has always been and still is the same. You may or may not like the individual that is running for president or mayor or governor, but who comes with them in their rise to power is an important consideration. With President Trump, we knew in advance that if successful, he would assemble literally the greatest cabinet that the United States has ever had. The proof of that is revealed in the video provided here. I enjoy an insight source within the White House, who tells me that they have never before seen more prayer meetings and more Bible studies, both in the White House and in the Republican Congress, than at any other time in recorded American history. The only people who would be upset with that would be atheists, communists, or non-Americans. There’s a good lesson to be learned here. None of us are perfect, but we would be wise to surround ourselves with people who, together, make a strong team.

Jack Hibbs

54,741 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I suspect that the travelling community of Ireland do not feel so happy to be represented in this way (hearing the Irish people and flag denigrated). Eileen Flynn, a clear DEI hire and not someone who was given a seat because of her merits, will probably now say that she is the victim because she is being made fun of. I am quite sick of over paid (by the tax payer), over privileged politicians (in this case one that was not even democratically elected) who blatantly use their platform and privelege to discriminate against Irish people and our flag. Saying the most outrageous and inflammatory harmful rubbish. Moralising to the rest of us as they attack an ethnic group with distinct rights. Deluding themselves that they are the good people, while openly calling for Irish people to celebrate that which is anthitetical to our values and attitudes toward women and girls. These politicians have gotten way too comfortable. There are men in this country who are on their knees and frequently in tears because they cannot figure our how to keep their farms and haulage businesses going. People who make sure Eileen's big gob gets fed. But she clearly doesn't care about that. The radical left are the ONLY ones appropriating the fuel protests for THEIR own agenda. By tarnishing and astroturfing the grassroots movement with lies about "The Far Right". Make no mistake. Not one of these radical leftists care if these men lose their businesses or even their lives to suicide (suicide is already way higher amongst the farming community than it is among non farming communities). Irish farmers and hauliers are MALE. WHITE. IRISH. CHRISTIAN. Wrong gender, wrong colour, wrong nationality, wrong creed.
2:45

I suspect that the travelling community of Ireland do not feel so happy to be represented in this way (hearing the Irish people and flag denigrated). Eileen Flynn, a clear DEI hire and not someone who was given a seat because of her merits, will probably now say that she is the victim because she is being made fun of. I am quite sick of over paid (by the tax payer), over privileged politicians (in this case one that was not even democratically elected) who blatantly use their platform and privelege to discriminate against Irish people and our flag. Saying the most outrageous and inflammatory harmful rubbish. Moralising to the rest of us as they attack an ethnic group with distinct rights. Deluding themselves that they are the good people, while openly calling for Irish people to celebrate that which is anthitetical to our values and attitudes toward women and girls. These politicians have gotten way too comfortable. There are men in this country who are on their knees and frequently in tears because they cannot figure our how to keep their farms and haulage businesses going. People who make sure Eileen's big gob gets fed. But she clearly doesn't care about that. The radical left are the ONLY ones appropriating the fuel protests for THEIR own agenda. By tarnishing and astroturfing the grassroots movement with lies about "The Far Right". Make no mistake. Not one of these radical leftists care if these men lose their businesses or even their lives to suicide (suicide is already way higher amongst the farming community than it is among non farming communities). Irish farmers and hauliers are MALE. WHITE. IRISH. CHRISTIAN. Wrong gender, wrong colour, wrong nationality, wrong creed.

Susanne Delaney

24,508 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The Unspoken Truths of Education in Israel-Palestine Israeli professor and author Nurit Peled Elhanan Interviewed by Journalist Robert Martin. As the world grapples with issues of racism and discrimination, the education system often comes under scrutiny for its role in shaping societal attitudes. A glaring example of this is found in the Israeli education system, as highlighted by Israeli professor and author Nurit Peled Elhanan. This critical examination delves into the complexities and biases inherent in the education systems of both Israel and Palestine, revealing a tapestry of controlled narratives, racial prejudices, and missed opportunities for peace education. Introduction The discussion begins with an overview of the education systems in Israel and Palestine, setting the stage for a deeper exploration into their intricacies and disparities. The intertwining of education with political and societal narratives is a central theme, as the article explores how these systems shape the perspectives of their students. Palestinian Education This chapter discusses the Palestinian education system, particularly focusing on its control and oversight by Israel. The nuances of this control and its implications on the educational content and quality are critically examined. Palestinian Curriculum Delving into the Palestinian curriculum, this section sheds light on the content taught in Palestinian schools, providing insights into the educational materials and their underlying messages. Palestinian History A significant focus is placed on the restrictions imposed on teaching Palestinian history and culture. The chapter discusses the consequences of these restrictions on Palestinian identity and cultural heritage. Palestinian Literature The portrayal of Palestinian literature and culture in the educational context is explored. This includes an analysis of how these aspects are represented, or often underrepresented, in school curricula. Israeli School Books An in-depth analysis of Israeli school books reveals how Palestinians are portrayed within these educational materials. The chapter critically examines the rhetoric and imagery used and its potential impact on shaping student perceptions. Racism in Israeli Discourse The issue of racism in Israeli discourse, especially within the educational context, is discussed. This section examines how racial prejudices are perpetuated through educational content and the broader societal discourse. Research Study This chapter discusses a study conducted on Palestinian and Israeli school books, providing a comparative analysis and highlighting the differences in narratives and portrayal of historical events. Book Content Analysis Further insights into the content analysis of Israeli school books are provided, with a focus on the language and rhetoric used to describe Palestinians and other ethnic groups. Nakba Mention The depiction of the Nakba in Israeli school books is critically examined. The chapter discusses how this historical event is portrayed and the implications of this portrayal on Israeli and Palestinian students. Holocaust Education The approach to Holocaust education in Israeli school books is analyzed, examining its depth, context, and the narratives that are emphasized or omitted. Peace Education A significant gap identified in the Israeli education system is the lack of peace education and initiatives promoting coexistence. This chapter discusses the importance of such education and the consequences of its absence. BDS Movement The Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement is discussed in relation to the education systems. This includes an exploration of how the movement is portrayed in educational materials and its impact on students. Ian's Story The personal story of Ian provides a poignant illustration of racism within the Israeli education system. His experiences shed light on the broader issues of racial segregation and discrimination. Racism in Israel A broader discussion on racism in Israel examines its impact on various ethnicities, including Palestinians, non-white individuals, and other minority groups. The chapter explores the systemic nature of this racism and its manifestations in different spheres, including education. Media Representation The article concludes with reflections on media representation since 2009, focusing on the lack of diversity, particularly the absence of Arabs, Ethiopians, and Oriental Jews in educational materials and media. This discussion ties back to the central theme of how education shapes societal attitudes and the importance of inclusive and unbiased educational content. This comprehensive examination not only sheds light on the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian educational landscape but also calls for a critical reevaluation of the role education plays in perpetuating or challenging societal prejudices and conflicts. #Israel #Palestine #IsraelIsAnApartheidState #IsraelPalestineWar #GazaGenocide
47:43

The Unspoken Truths of Education in Israel-Palestine Israeli professor and author Nurit Peled Elhanan Interviewed by Journalist Robert Martin. As the world grapples with issues of racism and discrimination, the education system often comes under scrutiny for its role in shaping societal attitudes. A glaring example of this is found in the Israeli education system, as highlighted by Israeli professor and author Nurit Peled Elhanan. This critical examination delves into the complexities and biases inherent in the education systems of both Israel and Palestine, revealing a tapestry of controlled narratives, racial prejudices, and missed opportunities for peace education. Introduction The discussion begins with an overview of the education systems in Israel and Palestine, setting the stage for a deeper exploration into their intricacies and disparities. The intertwining of education with political and societal narratives is a central theme, as the article explores how these systems shape the perspectives of their students. Palestinian Education This chapter discusses the Palestinian education system, particularly focusing on its control and oversight by Israel. The nuances of this control and its implications on the educational content and quality are critically examined. Palestinian Curriculum Delving into the Palestinian curriculum, this section sheds light on the content taught in Palestinian schools, providing insights into the educational materials and their underlying messages. Palestinian History A significant focus is placed on the restrictions imposed on teaching Palestinian history and culture. The chapter discusses the consequences of these restrictions on Palestinian identity and cultural heritage. Palestinian Literature The portrayal of Palestinian literature and culture in the educational context is explored. This includes an analysis of how these aspects are represented, or often underrepresented, in school curricula. Israeli School Books An in-depth analysis of Israeli school books reveals how Palestinians are portrayed within these educational materials. The chapter critically examines the rhetoric and imagery used and its potential impact on shaping student perceptions. Racism in Israeli Discourse The issue of racism in Israeli discourse, especially within the educational context, is discussed. This section examines how racial prejudices are perpetuated through educational content and the broader societal discourse. Research Study This chapter discusses a study conducted on Palestinian and Israeli school books, providing a comparative analysis and highlighting the differences in narratives and portrayal of historical events. Book Content Analysis Further insights into the content analysis of Israeli school books are provided, with a focus on the language and rhetoric used to describe Palestinians and other ethnic groups. Nakba Mention The depiction of the Nakba in Israeli school books is critically examined. The chapter discusses how this historical event is portrayed and the implications of this portrayal on Israeli and Palestinian students. Holocaust Education The approach to Holocaust education in Israeli school books is analyzed, examining its depth, context, and the narratives that are emphasized or omitted. Peace Education A significant gap identified in the Israeli education system is the lack of peace education and initiatives promoting coexistence. This chapter discusses the importance of such education and the consequences of its absence. BDS Movement The Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement is discussed in relation to the education systems. This includes an exploration of how the movement is portrayed in educational materials and its impact on students. Ian's Story The personal story of Ian provides a poignant illustration of racism within the Israeli education system. His experiences shed light on the broader issues of racial segregation and discrimination. Racism in Israel A broader discussion on racism in Israel examines its impact on various ethnicities, including Palestinians, non-white individuals, and other minority groups. The chapter explores the systemic nature of this racism and its manifestations in different spheres, including education. Media Representation The article concludes with reflections on media representation since 2009, focusing on the lack of diversity, particularly the absence of Arabs, Ethiopians, and Oriental Jews in educational materials and media. This discussion ties back to the central theme of how education shapes societal attitudes and the importance of inclusive and unbiased educational content. This comprehensive examination not only sheds light on the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian educational landscape but also calls for a critical reevaluation of the role education plays in perpetuating or challenging societal prejudices and conflicts. #Israel #Palestine #IsraelIsAnApartheidState #IsraelPalestineWar #GazaGenocide

The Canaanite

475,059 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

This video is propaganda. It functioned to keep Sargon in beer money, and the population of the UK in denial about race. Like all good lies, it contains elements of truth, of which Sargon supplies massive helpings - far more than most propagandists ever dare - but it's effective... The first two minutes and 32 seconds are all true, by which time your brain trusts him, and you see him as being on your side as a White native Englishman. Of course right from the start he picks the easiest of targets (put a box of cornflakes next to a Guardian journalist and it will look like a patriot). And then (at 2:33) you get: "...but luckily for everyone else, being English is not just about being a race...". He continues: "...it's a particular way of viewing the world much as anything else", "...saying that I as an individual matter; every human matters". Of course Carl is not in any way wrong to identify and celebrate various English cultural artefacts as English, nor is he wrong to identify them as cultural, but the trick being done is to cut away their moorings from the DNA of the people who created them. You don't see him doing it, but he's in the water, scuba-diving down with a knife between his teeth, towards the tethers... ...And sure enough, at 5:19, in a mocking sneering smug tone: "But anyway Maya, let's get back to 'racial politics'. Let's not talk about values or ideas or ideals, or things that actually make the world a better place: let's get back to your fucking racial politics" (building to an angry exasperated tone). And suddenly there we are. 😐 The culture in which we were all being encouraged to take pride and admire now floats entirely free of its genetic substrate. Racial politics is bad, and associated in your brain with Guardian journalists. This - our - culture which the bodies and brains of our ancestors built, is now some sort of magic pink sparkly cloud hovering just above the ground, into which Indians and Africans can walk serenely and thereby be sort of transformed into us, nearly, just so long as it's done at a slow responsible pace. At 5:54 Sargon continues his imaginary conversation with Maya of The Guardian, adopting a super-confident and mildly exasperated lecturing tone (his favourite mode of address, obviously), and says: "But Maya, immigrants are not just a race; there are many hundreds of thousands of immigrants from France, and if you go to London, to an area which is predominantly populated by French people, it would not be sensible to say 'well this is an English area of London', is it, and yet that's nothing to do with their race, because they, like you will obviously point out, are White...". Well hang on Carl, yes, they are all White, and so maybe the thing making it (as you say) "not-sensible" to say they should not be in London doesn't become non-racial. Looks like you just talked yourself there in an illogical way. They are all White. Maybe this matters. Perhaps if we instead consider the prospect of adding the same number (many hundreds of thousands) of subsaharan Africans to London rather than Frenchmen, now it would be very sensible indeed to say they should not be there, whence the sensible - racial - criterion is plain to see. A full essay on the evolution of human nature in geographically isolated regions and the neurodiversity which emerged from that is beyond the scope of this tweet, but suffice to say White culture is what you get from White people, and African culture is what you get from African people. Europeans are White, and the relative closeness among European countries and cultures (compared to subsaharan Africans) by most metrics you might care about is not a coincidence, since heritable biological traits actually exist and actually matter, and they are not distributed evenly between different racial groups (see Fst distance), ergo race matters. Carl is a master of tugging at heartstrings, talking about these "past generations of blacks" who "admired English culture", and "wanted to be like us" etc.. Yes, no doubt many such individuals existed. They were always exceptional though, and we know they were exceptional, because if they weren't then Africa today would basically be similar to Yorkshire, just with nicer weather. And the problem for Carl is that Africa is obviously not like that, nor does any population of blacks anywhere in the world behave as a group like Europeans. I don't care particularly about John Cleese or what he says or where he goes, so the rest of the video is not terribly interesting, but just note at 6:48 Carl talks in approving terms of how "a small number of immigrants is OK", but "an overwhelming flood is pushing that principle too far". The problem with that is the number of non-Whites already in Britain was crazy-high in 2019 when Carl made this video, and our children were already well on track to becoming minorities in British schools without adding a single immigrant, even back then. Horrible racial conflict has been rife across the capital at least since the 90s, and it would be delusional to see the 1981 Brixton riots as anything but racial, ...and all this, and every sort of demographic vandalism besides, has come to pass PURELY because people who had advocated for racial politics in the 60s and 70s were successfully demonised by the media, just as Carl is doing in this video. The obvious foolishness of large numbers is like the obvious danger of lots of gunpowder compared to a small amount of gunpowder. It's not like the conflict magically goes away when the numbers are small. You just get White people lying to themselves and pushing discomfort down into their subconsciousness, and non-Whites sometimes (but by no means always) playing the game at first till their numbers become large enough. Pakistanis understood that cultural attitudes to child rape were different in our country, and so they assimilated by successfully hiding their child rape for about 20 or 30 years. Some White people even helped with that assimilation. The parts of our culture that Carl claims to want to promote (rule of law, freedom to criticise Islam, mutual respect, etc) is stuff that exists DESPITE the non-White population in the UK. It IS racial. And like of course it's racial. We are our DNA. Our culture was made by people, ...who were made by DNA. You can not make White people feel good - proudly talking up White culture - and then in the next breath sneer down your nose at those engaging in racial politics. It's a nasty (and given that Carl is not stupid, I have to suspect cynical) trick, the effect of which is to encourage a White audience to continue entertaining a suicidal and delusional belief in a tabula rasa model of human nature. His defenders will say "oh this is an old video, he's changed now...", and I am sure he is delighted that you believe so. Show me any example of him back-tracking on a single word of that though. I'll wait. I am writing this because I see what's happening to our population, and frankly anyone who isn't willing to recognise the need for racial politics is not your friend in this battle. If Carl has changed, then now would be a really great time to make that clear and come out on the side of Racial Nationalism. Anything else is just muddying the waters and enabling the stigmatisation of actual patriots. Look at where the UK is, and where it is going. Look at the pictures of schools with literally a single White face sitting among a sea of blacks. It's fucking insane, and it's obviously a racial issue that requires racial politics. At least we're talking about a rational lawful non-violent approach to sorting out who should be allowed to claim Englishness. We're having a conversation. Steve Laws, for example, is not a terrorist: he is a brave patriot giving a voice to the native population of a land which wants to recover that land. In reality English people are basically lovely. We're softies. The rest of the world knows that though. If we start to get a serious program of remigration off the ground, yes the reduction in sheer numbers of racial aliens will be welcome in itself, but black families that didn't produce criminal rugrats, and haven't spent the past 40 years moaning about how racist the English are will probably find that White communities rally round them, put in a good word for them, and achieve a consensus about not deporting them. What needs to happen is a basic shift in the narrative, and in the psychology: the assumption and understanding should be that citizenship is genetic, and that any exception to that is a polite and kind gesture from our people, which we have the full moral and legal right to withhold if we feel that we're being treated as suckers. And that's what I have to say about that. ...And of course Happy New Year to everyone in Australia!!! 🥳🎉🪩 -A.Frog '25/'26 🐸👍🏻
20:47

This video is propaganda. It functioned to keep Sargon in beer money, and the population of the UK in denial about race. Like all good lies, it contains elements of truth, of which Sargon supplies massive helpings - far more than most propagandists ever dare - but it's effective... The first two minutes and 32 seconds are all true, by which time your brain trusts him, and you see him as being on your side as a White native Englishman. Of course right from the start he picks the easiest of targets (put a box of cornflakes next to a Guardian journalist and it will look like a patriot). And then (at 2:33) you get: "...but luckily for everyone else, being English is not just about being a race...". He continues: "...it's a particular way of viewing the world much as anything else", "...saying that I as an individual matter; every human matters". Of course Carl is not in any way wrong to identify and celebrate various English cultural artefacts as English, nor is he wrong to identify them as cultural, but the trick being done is to cut away their moorings from the DNA of the people who created them. You don't see him doing it, but he's in the water, scuba-diving down with a knife between his teeth, towards the tethers... ...And sure enough, at 5:19, in a mocking sneering smug tone: "But anyway Maya, let's get back to 'racial politics'. Let's not talk about values or ideas or ideals, or things that actually make the world a better place: let's get back to your fucking racial politics" (building to an angry exasperated tone). And suddenly there we are. 😐 The culture in which we were all being encouraged to take pride and admire now floats entirely free of its genetic substrate. Racial politics is bad, and associated in your brain with Guardian journalists. This - our - culture which the bodies and brains of our ancestors built, is now some sort of magic pink sparkly cloud hovering just above the ground, into which Indians and Africans can walk serenely and thereby be sort of transformed into us, nearly, just so long as it's done at a slow responsible pace. At 5:54 Sargon continues his imaginary conversation with Maya of The Guardian, adopting a super-confident and mildly exasperated lecturing tone (his favourite mode of address, obviously), and says: "But Maya, immigrants are not just a race; there are many hundreds of thousands of immigrants from France, and if you go to London, to an area which is predominantly populated by French people, it would not be sensible to say 'well this is an English area of London', is it, and yet that's nothing to do with their race, because they, like you will obviously point out, are White...". Well hang on Carl, yes, they are all White, and so maybe the thing making it (as you say) "not-sensible" to say they should not be in London doesn't become non-racial. Looks like you just talked yourself there in an illogical way. They are all White. Maybe this matters. Perhaps if we instead consider the prospect of adding the same number (many hundreds of thousands) of subsaharan Africans to London rather than Frenchmen, now it would be very sensible indeed to say they should not be there, whence the sensible - racial - criterion is plain to see. A full essay on the evolution of human nature in geographically isolated regions and the neurodiversity which emerged from that is beyond the scope of this tweet, but suffice to say White culture is what you get from White people, and African culture is what you get from African people. Europeans are White, and the relative closeness among European countries and cultures (compared to subsaharan Africans) by most metrics you might care about is not a coincidence, since heritable biological traits actually exist and actually matter, and they are not distributed evenly between different racial groups (see Fst distance), ergo race matters. Carl is a master of tugging at heartstrings, talking about these "past generations of blacks" who "admired English culture", and "wanted to be like us" etc.. Yes, no doubt many such individuals existed. They were always exceptional though, and we know they were exceptional, because if they weren't then Africa today would basically be similar to Yorkshire, just with nicer weather. And the problem for Carl is that Africa is obviously not like that, nor does any population of blacks anywhere in the world behave as a group like Europeans. I don't care particularly about John Cleese or what he says or where he goes, so the rest of the video is not terribly interesting, but just note at 6:48 Carl talks in approving terms of how "a small number of immigrants is OK", but "an overwhelming flood is pushing that principle too far". The problem with that is the number of non-Whites already in Britain was crazy-high in 2019 when Carl made this video, and our children were already well on track to becoming minorities in British schools without adding a single immigrant, even back then. Horrible racial conflict has been rife across the capital at least since the 90s, and it would be delusional to see the 1981 Brixton riots as anything but racial, ...and all this, and every sort of demographic vandalism besides, has come to pass PURELY because people who had advocated for racial politics in the 60s and 70s were successfully demonised by the media, just as Carl is doing in this video. The obvious foolishness of large numbers is like the obvious danger of lots of gunpowder compared to a small amount of gunpowder. It's not like the conflict magically goes away when the numbers are small. You just get White people lying to themselves and pushing discomfort down into their subconsciousness, and non-Whites sometimes (but by no means always) playing the game at first till their numbers become large enough. Pakistanis understood that cultural attitudes to child rape were different in our country, and so they assimilated by successfully hiding their child rape for about 20 or 30 years. Some White people even helped with that assimilation. The parts of our culture that Carl claims to want to promote (rule of law, freedom to criticise Islam, mutual respect, etc) is stuff that exists DESPITE the non-White population in the UK. It IS racial. And like of course it's racial. We are our DNA. Our culture was made by people, ...who were made by DNA. You can not make White people feel good - proudly talking up White culture - and then in the next breath sneer down your nose at those engaging in racial politics. It's a nasty (and given that Carl is not stupid, I have to suspect cynical) trick, the effect of which is to encourage a White audience to continue entertaining a suicidal and delusional belief in a tabula rasa model of human nature. His defenders will say "oh this is an old video, he's changed now...", and I am sure he is delighted that you believe so. Show me any example of him back-tracking on a single word of that though. I'll wait. I am writing this because I see what's happening to our population, and frankly anyone who isn't willing to recognise the need for racial politics is not your friend in this battle. If Carl has changed, then now would be a really great time to make that clear and come out on the side of Racial Nationalism. Anything else is just muddying the waters and enabling the stigmatisation of actual patriots. Look at where the UK is, and where it is going. Look at the pictures of schools with literally a single White face sitting among a sea of blacks. It's fucking insane, and it's obviously a racial issue that requires racial politics. At least we're talking about a rational lawful non-violent approach to sorting out who should be allowed to claim Englishness. We're having a conversation. Steve Laws, for example, is not a terrorist: he is a brave patriot giving a voice to the native population of a land which wants to recover that land. In reality English people are basically lovely. We're softies. The rest of the world knows that though. If we start to get a serious program of remigration off the ground, yes the reduction in sheer numbers of racial aliens will be welcome in itself, but black families that didn't produce criminal rugrats, and haven't spent the past 40 years moaning about how racist the English are will probably find that White communities rally round them, put in a good word for them, and achieve a consensus about not deporting them. What needs to happen is a basic shift in the narrative, and in the psychology: the assumption and understanding should be that citizenship is genetic, and that any exception to that is a polite and kind gesture from our people, which we have the full moral and legal right to withhold if we feel that we're being treated as suckers. And that's what I have to say about that. ...And of course Happy New Year to everyone in Australia!!! 🥳🎉🪩 -A.Frog '25/'26 🐸👍🏻

𝙰𝚌𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚝𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝙵𝚛𝚘𝚐

167,032 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

BOMBSHELL VIDEO 🚨: This is the most salient 3-minute clip from a long all-hands on "Diversity and Inclusion" at American Express On how they're going to stack the deck against white men (@ ~15s): "how are we going to do this? We're going to do it through a focus on recruitment, we're going to do it through a focus on actually helping people progress their careers through promotion and through retaining great talent and we're going to do it through a culture that's truly inclusive where everyone feels they can belong and they can bring their best talent to work every single day." Translation: we're going to lean hard on our recruiters to prefer candidates who are not white men. We're going to lean hard on our managers to promote employees who are not white men. Expressed (heh) through a feminized, moralizing framing of inclusivity and belonging. Recruiters and leaders will be scored on how well they do to advance towards these diversity quotas/targets, and almost certainly will be praised if they outperform. That's how targets work; you don't think they want to just stop at x%, do you anon? No, it's meant to be aggressive but achievable. More (@ 2:22) : "We've been focused on this area for a number of years, and we have made tremendous progress. And certainly when you look at our representation versus the industry, we are actually ahead in terms of the tech industry. However, the tech industry is not as well represented as other industries. So again, we have a lot to do." When you get systemically disadvantaged for hiring or promotion, they call this "tremendous progress." And despite being "ahead" of the industry, there's still "a lot to do." Until we are 100% diverse, there is more work to be done! Continuing on: "And you can see that we're looking to improve across all dimensions, including really cementing our senior leadership roles, where we would get close to and in some cases match the company aspirations for senior leadership." Again, they call you being denied entry or pushed out "improvement", and they're looking to "improve" across the board at every level. Formal disadvantage in hiring, promotion. They just come right out and say it, with what they think is a positive message of course. Take this realistic scenario: there are 5 director roles, only one of which is an open. They want to promote one of the managers into it. There are currently 3 male directors and 1 female. There are two managers up for promotion. As the male manager, you've got no shot, because the VP making the decision is scored on having a ~30% female director org. There's literally nothing you can do about it besides troon out. As long as this sort of policy exists, it will drive outcomes. "So now I'm going to talk to you about how we as a team are going to do this, and it's definitely a we and not an I." Another passive aggressive flex. Not only are we going to have this policy that explicitly disadvantages you, but you're going to help us implement it (unspoken: "or else"). I'll leave you with one more thing. This is not unique to American Express, not even a little. I've sat through these presentations. I have seen this at every Fortune 500 company I've ever interacted with or researched. I have seen this in the Federal Government (pre-Trump) and the United States Armed Forces. I have seen this at startups. This is literally and explicitly systemic discrimination. They boast about it openly everywhere you go to flex on you. It can't go on. #OperationChimpOut
3:06

BOMBSHELL VIDEO 🚨: This is the most salient 3-minute clip from a long all-hands on "Diversity and Inclusion" at American Express On how they're going to stack the deck against white men (@ ~15s): "how are we going to do this? We're going to do it through a focus on recruitment, we're going to do it through a focus on actually helping people progress their careers through promotion and through retaining great talent and we're going to do it through a culture that's truly inclusive where everyone feels they can belong and they can bring their best talent to work every single day." Translation: we're going to lean hard on our recruiters to prefer candidates who are not white men. We're going to lean hard on our managers to promote employees who are not white men. Expressed (heh) through a feminized, moralizing framing of inclusivity and belonging. Recruiters and leaders will be scored on how well they do to advance towards these diversity quotas/targets, and almost certainly will be praised if they outperform. That's how targets work; you don't think they want to just stop at x%, do you anon? No, it's meant to be aggressive but achievable. More (@ 2:22) : "We've been focused on this area for a number of years, and we have made tremendous progress. And certainly when you look at our representation versus the industry, we are actually ahead in terms of the tech industry. However, the tech industry is not as well represented as other industries. So again, we have a lot to do." When you get systemically disadvantaged for hiring or promotion, they call this "tremendous progress." And despite being "ahead" of the industry, there's still "a lot to do." Until we are 100% diverse, there is more work to be done! Continuing on: "And you can see that we're looking to improve across all dimensions, including really cementing our senior leadership roles, where we would get close to and in some cases match the company aspirations for senior leadership." Again, they call you being denied entry or pushed out "improvement", and they're looking to "improve" across the board at every level. Formal disadvantage in hiring, promotion. They just come right out and say it, with what they think is a positive message of course. Take this realistic scenario: there are 5 director roles, only one of which is an open. They want to promote one of the managers into it. There are currently 3 male directors and 1 female. There are two managers up for promotion. As the male manager, you've got no shot, because the VP making the decision is scored on having a ~30% female director org. There's literally nothing you can do about it besides troon out. As long as this sort of policy exists, it will drive outcomes. "So now I'm going to talk to you about how we as a team are going to do this, and it's definitely a we and not an I." Another passive aggressive flex. Not only are we going to have this policy that explicitly disadvantages you, but you're going to help us implement it (unspoken: "or else"). I'll leave you with one more thing. This is not unique to American Express, not even a little. I've sat through these presentations. I have seen this at every Fortune 500 company I've ever interacted with or researched. I have seen this in the Federal Government (pre-Trump) and the United States Armed Forces. I have seen this at startups. This is literally and explicitly systemic discrimination. They boast about it openly everywhere you go to flex on you. It can't go on. #OperationChimpOut

Karl Hollywood

269,884 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

#Euphoria #Season3Episode3 “You love who you love” Contrary to popular belief, Nate truly seems to love Cassie and accepts her with all her crazy antics. In this clip, she publicly humiliates him but he still tries to placate her. Yes, this doesn’t seem like the Nate we knew, but isn’t he? He wanted to be loved but his dynamic with Cal was so toxic, he felt unlovable. Lashed out in anger for lack of expression otherwise. Maddy’s feisty ways did nothing to nurture the broken child in him. They had a horrible relationship because neither could heal the other’s real wounds. Both he and Cassie betrayed their best friends and seemed to find something in each other that made them feel loved. As broken and flawed their story might be, as Nate tells Jules “you love who you love”. We had plenty of hints that the night of this incredible wedding party was going to end in total chaos. Nate is caught between a rock and a hard place. He truly wants to build an honest life, but as an entrepreneur myself, I fully empathize with his business struggles and the financial hole he is in. He has to maintain a mask of competence so that he doesn’t lose investor confidence in the business. Bureaucratic shenanigans in real estate coupled with high interest rates, especially in California where building codes are increasingly debilitating, have led to many bankruptcies and foreclosures in the construction business. An endangered flower like the white fritillaries in a construction zone can bring a project to a grinding halt, putting jobs, livelihoods and businesses at risk. The balance between conservation and progress in California is reaching unhealthy proportions. Nate’s business woes are not rooted in him wanting to con people. And yet, he now has to face the consequences of this thin line he has been walking to maintain investor confidence versus cutting visible corners so he could better manage his costs. Cassie refused to understand this and so he caved to her demands and puts on a more lavish wedding than he could afford. The cinematic choice of Nate getting beaten to a pulp while she wails about her bloody nose is such a typical “Crazy Cassie” thing to do! The key is in what Naz tells her: “Some women inherit wealth but other inherit debt”. Watch her turn to Alamo/Silver Slippers so that she is truly next to Nate for “richer or poorer”. Regardless of her melodrama about not wanting to be poor (thanks to her mother’s incessant poisoning of the well), Cassie’s biggest desire in life is to be loved. And for better or for worse, Cassie & Nate have taken the vows to be there for each other. I predict she goes out into the world to make money in ways she knows how, to service this debt she’s inherited as Mrs. Jacobs. I know Jacob and Sydney will push the limits of their characters caught in these ludicrous scenarios. I am seated for this! Maddy’s uncomfortable presence at the wedding, Marsha’s jabs at her, her witnessing the love Nate & Cassie seem to have for each other, are beautifully and painfully captured by Alexa. She truly owns her role as Maddy, who is a pro at faking it till she makes it. She’s hurt by the life she didn’t get but she should feel blessed about making an honest living where she stands on her own. Being rich is a nice aspiration but sometimes the prices to be paid are too high. Nate is now dismembered from the desire to maintain their affluent status. Jules’ plot is tragic. The character who seems to have the most sense of self in high school, who whole heartedly and unapologetically embraced her queerness, is now a walking shell with no sense of integrity. It will be interesting to see what Sam imagines for her to reclaim herself again. Rue navigating this new world of crime is a challenging role for Zendaya she’s knocking out of the ball park. I know she’s just getting started. Looking forward to more of her sassy, gender bending antics as her plot unfolds. Loving this season!!
0:33

#Euphoria #Season3Episode3 “You love who you love” Contrary to popular belief, Nate truly seems to love Cassie and accepts her with all her crazy antics. In this clip, she publicly humiliates him but he still tries to placate her. Yes, this doesn’t seem like the Nate we knew, but isn’t he? He wanted to be loved but his dynamic with Cal was so toxic, he felt unlovable. Lashed out in anger for lack of expression otherwise. Maddy’s feisty ways did nothing to nurture the broken child in him. They had a horrible relationship because neither could heal the other’s real wounds. Both he and Cassie betrayed their best friends and seemed to find something in each other that made them feel loved. As broken and flawed their story might be, as Nate tells Jules “you love who you love”. We had plenty of hints that the night of this incredible wedding party was going to end in total chaos. Nate is caught between a rock and a hard place. He truly wants to build an honest life, but as an entrepreneur myself, I fully empathize with his business struggles and the financial hole he is in. He has to maintain a mask of competence so that he doesn’t lose investor confidence in the business. Bureaucratic shenanigans in real estate coupled with high interest rates, especially in California where building codes are increasingly debilitating, have led to many bankruptcies and foreclosures in the construction business. An endangered flower like the white fritillaries in a construction zone can bring a project to a grinding halt, putting jobs, livelihoods and businesses at risk. The balance between conservation and progress in California is reaching unhealthy proportions. Nate’s business woes are not rooted in him wanting to con people. And yet, he now has to face the consequences of this thin line he has been walking to maintain investor confidence versus cutting visible corners so he could better manage his costs. Cassie refused to understand this and so he caved to her demands and puts on a more lavish wedding than he could afford. The cinematic choice of Nate getting beaten to a pulp while she wails about her bloody nose is such a typical “Crazy Cassie” thing to do! The key is in what Naz tells her: “Some women inherit wealth but other inherit debt”. Watch her turn to Alamo/Silver Slippers so that she is truly next to Nate for “richer or poorer”. Regardless of her melodrama about not wanting to be poor (thanks to her mother’s incessant poisoning of the well), Cassie’s biggest desire in life is to be loved. And for better or for worse, Cassie & Nate have taken the vows to be there for each other. I predict she goes out into the world to make money in ways she knows how, to service this debt she’s inherited as Mrs. Jacobs. I know Jacob and Sydney will push the limits of their characters caught in these ludicrous scenarios. I am seated for this! Maddy’s uncomfortable presence at the wedding, Marsha’s jabs at her, her witnessing the love Nate & Cassie seem to have for each other, are beautifully and painfully captured by Alexa. She truly owns her role as Maddy, who is a pro at faking it till she makes it. She’s hurt by the life she didn’t get but she should feel blessed about making an honest living where she stands on her own. Being rich is a nice aspiration but sometimes the prices to be paid are too high. Nate is now dismembered from the desire to maintain their affluent status. Jules’ plot is tragic. The character who seems to have the most sense of self in high school, who whole heartedly and unapologetically embraced her queerness, is now a walking shell with no sense of integrity. It will be interesting to see what Sam imagines for her to reclaim herself again. Rue navigating this new world of crime is a challenging role for Zendaya she’s knocking out of the ball park. I know she’s just getting started. Looking forward to more of her sassy, gender bending antics as her plot unfolds. Loving this season!!

mh-Musings

116,105 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten