Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Whitehouse: If it should turn out that there were communications between the MAGA DOJ people, like Blanche, and the Trump judges who stopped the Boasberg contempt hearing, and this thing was a setup to create that window so that they could shove Bove through, Blanche, under oath, will be... show more

Acyn

756,756 subscribers

120,817 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Blanche: it's absolutely false to suggest that this DOJ is not executing as we should in doing the right thing every single day. Whitehouse: I will tell you that you are wrong, that in the history of the department, this kind of criticism by federal judges is unprecedented. And it comes from judges of every different political persuasion.

Blanche: it's absolutely false to suggest that this DOJ is not executing as we should in doing the right thing every single day. Whitehouse: I will tell you that you are wrong, that in the history of the department, this kind of criticism by federal judges is unprecedented. And it comes from judges of every different political persuasion.

Acyn

53,478 views • 2 months ago

Blanche: The president feels very strongly, as do I, that there were people who were victims of a DOJ that was absolutely weaponized. He feels very strongly he would want to make them whole, as do I. But it will not be through the anti weaponization fund.

Blanche: The president feels very strongly, as do I, that there were people who were victims of a DOJ that was absolutely weaponized. He feels very strongly he would want to make them whole, as do I. But it will not be through the anti weaponization fund.

Acyn

283,370 views • 1 month ago

Q: Are you concerned that voters may be confused about what their options are to vote by mail, and what will the DOJ do to educate people? Blanche: I'm not sure the American people were following this that closely

Q: Are you concerned that voters may be confused about what their options are to vote by mail, and what will the DOJ do to educate people? Blanche: I'm not sure the American people were following this that closely

FactPost

14,622 views • 24 days ago

MacFarlane: You filed an amicus brief in this appeal by the January 6th seditious conspirators. What message are you trying to send? Raskin: The DOJ brought criminal prosecutions against the people who stormed the Capitol, who organized to storm the Capitol, who assaulted our officers. And then 1,600 of them were convicted. The president pardoned most of them. There were a handful he didn’t, because their crimes were so serious that he just commuted their sentences, but he didn’t want to grant them a pardon for all civil disabilities going forward. And those were Proud Boys and Oath Keepers. And now the DOJ is essentially flipping sides and saying they want to vacate their convictions. So I filed an amicus brief saying, well, if the DOJ wants to vacate their convictions—and of course it’s unopposed by the defendants—who’s going to be speaking up for the public interest? Who’s speaking up for the victims, the police officers, and other people who were injured in the attack? Who’s speaking up for the democracy that was under siege that day? And so the amicus brief that I filed just said they should appoint someone to be an objective, neutral amicus lawyer who can advise the court as to whether or not they should actually approve this motion to just dissolve and vaporize these criminal convictions.

MacFarlane: You filed an amicus brief in this appeal by the January 6th seditious conspirators. What message are you trying to send? Raskin: The DOJ brought criminal prosecutions against the people who stormed the Capitol, who organized to storm the Capitol, who assaulted our officers. And then 1,600 of them were convicted. The president pardoned most of them. There were a handful he didn’t, because their crimes were so serious that he just commuted their sentences, but he didn’t want to grant them a pardon for all civil disabilities going forward. And those were Proud Boys and Oath Keepers. And now the DOJ is essentially flipping sides and saying they want to vacate their convictions. So I filed an amicus brief saying, well, if the DOJ wants to vacate their convictions—and of course it’s unopposed by the defendants—who’s going to be speaking up for the public interest? Who’s speaking up for the victims, the police officers, and other people who were injured in the attack? Who’s speaking up for the democracy that was under siege that day? And so the amicus brief that I filed just said they should appoint someone to be an objective, neutral amicus lawyer who can advise the court as to whether or not they should actually approve this motion to just dissolve and vaporize these criminal convictions.

Acyn

134,245 views • 5 months ago

IS DOJ INVESTIGATING WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO JANUARY 6 DEFENDANTS? LindellTV White House Correspondent Cara Castronuova pressed Attorney General Todd Blanche on the status of DOJ’s Weaponization Working Group and whether its review includes the treatment of January 6 defendants, the deaths that occurred that day, potential federal agency involvement and possible communications between Biden-era DOJ officials and D.C. judges. “Will you also consider investigating whether there was improper contact between Merrick Garland’s DOJ and the J6 D.C. judges who presided over those political prosecutions?” Blanche’s response appeared to indicate the broader review remains ongoing. What are your thoughts? Did corrupt D.C. activist judges communicate illegally with Merrick Garland’s DOJ to politically persecute American citizens?

IS DOJ INVESTIGATING WHAT REALLY HAPPENED TO JANUARY 6 DEFENDANTS? LindellTV White House Correspondent Cara Castronuova pressed Attorney General Todd Blanche on the status of DOJ’s Weaponization Working Group and whether its review includes the treatment of January 6 defendants, the deaths that occurred that day, potential federal agency involvement and possible communications between Biden-era DOJ officials and D.C. judges. “Will you also consider investigating whether there was improper contact between Merrick Garland’s DOJ and the J6 D.C. judges who presided over those political prosecutions?” Blanche’s response appeared to indicate the broader review remains ongoing. What are your thoughts? Did corrupt D.C. activist judges communicate illegally with Merrick Garland’s DOJ to politically persecute American citizens?

LindellTV

270,878 views • 24 days ago

Blanche: There were a number of photographs that were pulled down after being released on Friday. That's because a judge in New York has ordered us to listen to any victim or victim rights group if they have any concerns about the material that we're putting up. Welker: 15 files disappeared from the DOJ’s website yesterday, including this photo of what looks like a desk with a drawer open containing photos of Donald Trump. Blanche: Well, you can see in that photo there are photographs of women. And we learned after releasing that photograph that there were concerns about those women and the fact that we had put that photo up. So we pulled that photo down. It has nothing to do with President Trump. Welker: Are you saying that one or more of the women in one of the photos or or several of the photos is a victim or a survivor of Jeffrey Epstein and that's why you took the those files down? Blanche: No, that's not that's not what I'm saying.

Blanche: There were a number of photographs that were pulled down after being released on Friday. That's because a judge in New York has ordered us to listen to any victim or victim rights group if they have any concerns about the material that we're putting up. Welker: 15 files disappeared from the DOJ’s website yesterday, including this photo of what looks like a desk with a drawer open containing photos of Donald Trump. Blanche: Well, you can see in that photo there are photographs of women. And we learned after releasing that photograph that there were concerns about those women and the fact that we had put that photo up. So we pulled that photo down. It has nothing to do with President Trump. Welker: Are you saying that one or more of the women in one of the photos or or several of the photos is a victim or a survivor of Jeffrey Epstein and that's why you took the those files down? Blanche: No, that's not that's not what I'm saying.

Acyn

82,796 views • 9 months ago

Attorney General Todd Blanche said Wednesday that if Congress were to pass a law prohibiting the creation of an anti-weaponization fund, "we would support that, as would the White House." “The president feels very strongly, as do I, that there were people who were victims of a Department of Justice that was absolutely weaponized. And he feels very strongly that he would want to make them whole, as do I,” Blanche said. “But it will not be through the anti-weaponization fund..."

Attorney General Todd Blanche said Wednesday that if Congress were to pass a law prohibiting the creation of an anti-weaponization fund, "we would support that, as would the White House." “The president feels very strongly, as do I, that there were people who were victims of a Department of Justice that was absolutely weaponized. And he feels very strongly that he would want to make them whole, as do I,” Blanche said. “But it will not be through the anti-weaponization fund..."

CBS News

112,797 views • 1 month ago

Stephanopoulos: The lawyer for Liam Ramos and his father say they were following the legal process for asylum. Blanche: I don't know what that means. Stephanopoulos: They applied for asylum and they were going through the legal process. Blanche: That’s not true.

Stephanopoulos: The lawyer for Liam Ramos and his father say they were following the legal process for asylum. Blanche: I don't know what that means. Stephanopoulos: They applied for asylum and they were going through the legal process. Blanche: That’s not true.

Acyn

286,241 views • 8 months ago

Elias: There are two possibilities here. The first is that the Postal Service and Donald Trump know that this can’t be done. And that’s actually the point. That’s not a flaw. That’s a feature. Because what they want—what Donald Trump wants—is for states to fail at achieving what it is the Postal Service told them to achieve. So that Donald Trump will then be able to say that the states disregarded this regulation, the states were, you know, were rife with fraud, whatever it is, right? So, like, in some ways, they want this to not be a smooth process for the sake of pointing that out, that when Democrats win control of Congress, they can point to that. The second is that Donald Trump’s going to somehow just declare that, well, you know what, if states can’t do it, then no one can vote by mail.

Elias: There are two possibilities here. The first is that the Postal Service and Donald Trump know that this can’t be done. And that’s actually the point. That’s not a flaw. That’s a feature. Because what they want—what Donald Trump wants—is for states to fail at achieving what it is the Postal Service told them to achieve. So that Donald Trump will then be able to say that the states disregarded this regulation, the states were, you know, were rife with fraud, whatever it is, right? So, like, in some ways, they want this to not be a smooth process for the sake of pointing that out, that when Democrats win control of Congress, they can point to that. The second is that Donald Trump’s going to somehow just declare that, well, you know what, if states can’t do it, then no one can vote by mail.

Acyn

56,264 views • 1 month ago

Reporter: Do you believe there should be a public hearing for more of these Epstein survivors? Trump: I'm okay with that. But I understand the women didn't want to go under oath. That's what I heard, that the victims or whatever, they refused to go under oath

Reporter: Do you believe there should be a public hearing for more of these Epstein survivors? Trump: I'm okay with that. But I understand the women didn't want to go under oath. That's what I heard, that the victims or whatever, they refused to go under oath

Acyn

370,440 views • 5 months ago

PabloReports: Todd Blanche was bragging at CPAC today about pardoning the January 6 insurrectionists. Dean: It’s beyond shameful. I try to figure out the most shocking thing that’s been done under this administration, and that is probably number one. On day one, Trump pardoned over 1,500 people who had either been convicted, pleaded guilty, or were incarcerated for an attack on the Capitol. I was here for that. It is shameful—but not surprising that they would still be bragging about it.

PabloReports: Todd Blanche was bragging at CPAC today about pardoning the January 6 insurrectionists. Dean: It’s beyond shameful. I try to figure out the most shocking thing that’s been done under this administration, and that is probably number one. On day one, Trump pardoned over 1,500 people who had either been convicted, pleaded guilty, or were incarcerated for an attack on the Capitol. I was here for that. It is shameful—but not surprising that they would still be bragging about it.

Acyn

74,810 views • 6 months ago

Retired LT. Gen. Ben Hodges: The thing that really pushed me over the edge on Mr. Trump is when I heard him talking about “my generals” and “my judges” as if we were some third world country that the judges and generals all owed their fealty to whoever the dictator was.

Retired LT. Gen. Ben Hodges: The thing that really pushed me over the edge on Mr. Trump is when I heard him talking about “my generals” and “my judges” as if we were some third world country that the judges and generals all owed their fealty to whoever the dictator was.

Acyn

1,195,769 views • 2 years ago

Reporter: Historically, there's been a kind of a firewall on criminal investigations between the White House and the DOJ. Blanche: That is the most false statement I've ever heard in my life. There is always communication between a president and his priorities and what the DOJ should be focused on and not focused on

Reporter: Historically, there's been a kind of a firewall on criminal investigations between the White House and the DOJ. Blanche: That is the most false statement I've ever heard in my life. There is always communication between a president and his priorities and what the DOJ should be focused on and not focused on

Acyn

84,634 views • 6 months ago

Reporter: “Is it your position that judges should not speak publicly about the administration's actions at all? Like, would a judge, for example, that speaks out in support of actions by the administration be subject to the same kind of ethics complaints?” AG Todd Blanche: “This isn't an administrative position. This is a judicial canon… A judge is not supposed to speak out about a matter pending before it. And then there are other limits, certainly under 8th Circuit Law but every circuit has similar law about what a judge should do to give not only actual proof to show that they’re not biased, but also remove the perception of bias.” How is it controversial that ACTIVIST Judges should not be running to the New York Times to rage about the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement in Minnesota WHILE they are handling some of these cases?

Reporter: “Is it your position that judges should not speak publicly about the administration's actions at all? Like, would a judge, for example, that speaks out in support of actions by the administration be subject to the same kind of ethics complaints?” AG Todd Blanche: “This isn't an administrative position. This is a judicial canon… A judge is not supposed to speak out about a matter pending before it. And then there are other limits, certainly under 8th Circuit Law but every circuit has similar law about what a judge should do to give not only actual proof to show that they’re not biased, but also remove the perception of bias.” How is it controversial that ACTIVIST Judges should not be running to the New York Times to rage about the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement in Minnesota WHILE they are handling some of these cases?

RedWave Press

53,884 views • 9 days ago

PabloReports: Trump is scheduled to give another one of his deranged rants about elections and election fraud. Should networks run it? Magaziner: If they run it, they should immediately point out that it’s a lie. It’s desperation. He knows that he’s lost the American people. The American people are angry about the war, about the high cost of living, about ICE continuing to kill innocent people in the streets. So this is the last desperate gasp of the Trump election denial machine, and they should call it out for what it is. Any news outlet that repeats what Donald Trump says about the 2020 election without saying it is false is complicit.

PabloReports: Trump is scheduled to give another one of his deranged rants about elections and election fraud. Should networks run it? Magaziner: If they run it, they should immediately point out that it’s a lie. It’s desperation. He knows that he’s lost the American people. The American people are angry about the war, about the high cost of living, about ICE continuing to kill innocent people in the streets. So this is the last desperate gasp of the Trump election denial machine, and they should call it out for what it is. Any news outlet that repeats what Donald Trump says about the 2020 election without saying it is false is complicit.

Acyn

158,341 views • 2 months ago

Welker: "Trump pardoned everyone who attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6, including 172 people who pleaded guilty to assaulting police officers. How is that consistent with your pledge to always protect law enforcement?" Blanche: "There is nothing inconsistent." Welker: "On Jan. 6 police officers were beaten with bats and flagpoles. Do you believe it was wrong to assault police officers on Jan. 6 given that you have vowed to protect law enforcement?" Blanche: "No, I'm not opining or in any way saying that what President Trump did was wrong. Absolutely not." Welker: "Is it inconsistent with your pledge?" Blanche: "No…There is a difference between saying we will prosecute anybody. If later a president chooses to pardon that individual, that is the president's right under our constitution." Welker: "What message does it send to police officers that people who assaulted them were pardoned." Blanche: "The message to police officers is consistent in saying every day we will protect you."

Welker: "Trump pardoned everyone who attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6, including 172 people who pleaded guilty to assaulting police officers. How is that consistent with your pledge to always protect law enforcement?" Blanche: "There is nothing inconsistent." Welker: "On Jan. 6 police officers were beaten with bats and flagpoles. Do you believe it was wrong to assault police officers on Jan. 6 given that you have vowed to protect law enforcement?" Blanche: "No, I'm not opining or in any way saying that what President Trump did was wrong. Absolutely not." Welker: "Is it inconsistent with your pledge?" Blanche: "No…There is a difference between saying we will prosecute anybody. If later a president chooses to pardon that individual, that is the president's right under our constitution." Welker: "What message does it send to police officers that people who assaulted them were pardoned." Blanche: "The message to police officers is consistent in saying every day we will protect you."

The Bulwark

521,755 views • 1 month ago