Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Who ACTUALLY deleted Google searches from January 29, 2022? Spoiler alert: it wasn't Jen McCabe. For more than four years, Karen Read, her attorneys, and the FKR movement have claimed that Jen McCabe deleted Google searches. But in this clip, we explain who actually deleted Google searches - and... show more

The Forensic Room

1,221 subscribers

46,384 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

BREAKING - PERJURY ALERT: Kerry Roberts lied under oath to the grand jury to help Jen McCabe frame #KarenRead for her (Jen’s) incriminating 2:27am Google search. Kerry just admitted that she’d previously lied and claimed she’d heard Karen Read ask Jen McCabe to Google “hypothermia”. However, today Kerry admitted she’d never heard Karen Read ask Jen McCabe any such thing, but rather was lying about something that never happened, and was doing so merely because Jen McCabe “said” something happened. Takeaway? Kerry Roberts has proven she will testify to things as fact that Jen McCabe tells her. Kerry Roberts claimed to have gotten this info from when her and Jen McCabe made their alibi scripts aka “timelines” together. As a reminder, Michelle Troconis was convicted of conspiracy to commit murder where the majority incriminating evidence was her handwritten timelines aka “alibi scripts”. #KarenRead #KerryRoberts #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

BREAKING - PERJURY ALERT: Kerry Roberts lied under oath to the grand jury to help Jen McCabe frame #KarenRead for her (Jen’s) incriminating 2:27am Google search. Kerry just admitted that she’d previously lied and claimed she’d heard Karen Read ask Jen McCabe to Google “hypothermia”. However, today Kerry admitted she’d never heard Karen Read ask Jen McCabe any such thing, but rather was lying about something that never happened, and was doing so merely because Jen McCabe “said” something happened. Takeaway? Kerry Roberts has proven she will testify to things as fact that Jen McCabe tells her. Kerry Roberts claimed to have gotten this info from when her and Jen McCabe made their alibi scripts aka “timelines” together. As a reminder, Michelle Troconis was convicted of conspiracy to commit murder where the majority incriminating evidence was her handwritten timelines aka “alibi scripts”. #KarenRead #KerryRoberts #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

229,639 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

EXPOSING JEN MCCABE’S 2:27AM SEARCH 🧵A thread🧵 Proof she’s lying. No computer expert necessary. ADA Adam Lally asks Jen McCabe about when & why she made those Google searches at the scene in the morning. The video footage proves that Jen McCabe’s entire story about #KarenRead purportedly asking her to Google “hos long to die in cold” is a lie because it never happened. Jen claims Karen asked her to make those Google searches while the first responders are moving #JohnOKeefe’s body from the ground to the ambulance, which is interesting because her story starts out with them (her & Karen) seated in the back of a Police cruiser, so it’s unclear how they magically teleported from there to standing outside. As you’ll also see in the attached footage, it’s clear Jen & Karen are outside the entirety of the time leading up to when Jen claims this happened, removing the possibility that they could’ve moved from a cruiser to the outside to account for Jen’s story’s discrepancies. Officer Mullaney will further corroborate this. THE PROBLEM IS: Jen McCabe claims to have made these searches during the same time that first responders were working on/moving John into the ambulance, but this is completely disproven by dashcam surveillance footage from the scene showing him being worked on at 6:14:10am & moved into the ambulance at 6:14:50am. Jen made no searches at or around this time. She made her searches at 6:23 & 6:24am, nearly 10 minutes later. Furthermore, none of the things—like prayers & blood—that Jen claims happened between her, Karen & Kerry at this time, actually happen. The footage shows it’s all made up, like Karen asking Jen to Google anything. ————— JEN MCCABE’S TESTIMONY: Jen claims she was sitting in the back of the Police cruiser with #KarenRead, that she “scooched in” beside her in the back, and that Kerry Roberts came over. Next, Jen claims that Karen grabbed their hands & asked them to pray, looked at her (own) hands & saw blood, and proceeded to ask if she could’ve gotten her period. Jen then claims Karen said “what if he’s dead? Who’s gonna take care of the kids?” (or something to that effect). Jen then says: “Then we prayed. Um…then at the end, um, Mister—they were moving John, and at that point Karen told Kerry ‘go over, look! Is he dead? Is he dead? Is he dead?’ over & over, and Kerry says ‘I’ll go over and check on him’ and [Karen] was yelling ‘are they working on him?’.” Jen proceeds to say: “And then at that point, [Karen] grabbed my hands & she said ‘Google hypothermia, Google how long it takes to die in the cold’.” Then Jen McCabe testifies: “And so I had my phone out, and it was cold, and my hands were frozen, and I have MS, and I took my phone out while she was screaming & shaking my arm. And I attempted to Google “how long does it take to die in the cold”. ADA Lally then asks Jen McCabe: “And, um, when you conducted that search, that was at the defendant’s request, on scene, sometime after 6am on that date, correct?” Jen testifies: “Yes.” ADA Lally: “Do you recall anything as far as what the search results were, or did you click on anything, or did you get an answer to the question the defendant had posed to you?” Jen McCabe: “I don’t even think I got an answer because as I kept Googling, and she kept yelling, and then they were moving John, and the next thing I knew we were kind of moving because she wanted to see if they were working on him.” ADA Lally: “And so you were moving along with the defendant over towards where Mr. O’Keefe had gone to the back of the ambulance?” Jen McCabe: “Yes we kind of just moved to see what was going on.” ADA Lally: “When you moved over what did you see then?” Jen McCabe: “They were just, uh putting him in the back of the ambulance.” ————— See attached timeline. If Jen’s claim that Karen asked her to Google that were true, then Jen would’ve Google’d it during any time in the orange/red box (6:14 - 6:15am). #KarenReadTrial

EXPOSING JEN MCCABE’S 2:27AM SEARCH 🧵A thread🧵 Proof she’s lying. No computer expert necessary. ADA Adam Lally asks Jen McCabe about when & why she made those Google searches at the scene in the morning. The video footage proves that Jen McCabe’s entire story about #KarenRead purportedly asking her to Google “hos long to die in cold” is a lie because it never happened. Jen claims Karen asked her to make those Google searches while the first responders are moving #JohnOKeefe’s body from the ground to the ambulance, which is interesting because her story starts out with them (her & Karen) seated in the back of a Police cruiser, so it’s unclear how they magically teleported from there to standing outside. As you’ll also see in the attached footage, it’s clear Jen & Karen are outside the entirety of the time leading up to when Jen claims this happened, removing the possibility that they could’ve moved from a cruiser to the outside to account for Jen’s story’s discrepancies. Officer Mullaney will further corroborate this. THE PROBLEM IS: Jen McCabe claims to have made these searches during the same time that first responders were working on/moving John into the ambulance, but this is completely disproven by dashcam surveillance footage from the scene showing him being worked on at 6:14:10am & moved into the ambulance at 6:14:50am. Jen made no searches at or around this time. She made her searches at 6:23 & 6:24am, nearly 10 minutes later. Furthermore, none of the things—like prayers & blood—that Jen claims happened between her, Karen & Kerry at this time, actually happen. The footage shows it’s all made up, like Karen asking Jen to Google anything. ————— JEN MCCABE’S TESTIMONY: Jen claims she was sitting in the back of the Police cruiser with #KarenRead, that she “scooched in” beside her in the back, and that Kerry Roberts came over. Next, Jen claims that Karen grabbed their hands & asked them to pray, looked at her (own) hands & saw blood, and proceeded to ask if she could’ve gotten her period. Jen then claims Karen said “what if he’s dead? Who’s gonna take care of the kids?” (or something to that effect). Jen then says: “Then we prayed. Um…then at the end, um, Mister—they were moving John, and at that point Karen told Kerry ‘go over, look! Is he dead? Is he dead? Is he dead?’ over & over, and Kerry says ‘I’ll go over and check on him’ and [Karen] was yelling ‘are they working on him?’.” Jen proceeds to say: “And then at that point, [Karen] grabbed my hands & she said ‘Google hypothermia, Google how long it takes to die in the cold’.” Then Jen McCabe testifies: “And so I had my phone out, and it was cold, and my hands were frozen, and I have MS, and I took my phone out while she was screaming & shaking my arm. And I attempted to Google “how long does it take to die in the cold”. ADA Lally then asks Jen McCabe: “And, um, when you conducted that search, that was at the defendant’s request, on scene, sometime after 6am on that date, correct?” Jen testifies: “Yes.” ADA Lally: “Do you recall anything as far as what the search results were, or did you click on anything, or did you get an answer to the question the defendant had posed to you?” Jen McCabe: “I don’t even think I got an answer because as I kept Googling, and she kept yelling, and then they were moving John, and the next thing I knew we were kind of moving because she wanted to see if they were working on him.” ADA Lally: “And so you were moving along with the defendant over towards where Mr. O’Keefe had gone to the back of the ambulance?” Jen McCabe: “Yes we kind of just moved to see what was going on.” ADA Lally: “When you moved over what did you see then?” Jen McCabe: “They were just, uh putting him in the back of the ambulance.” ————— See attached timeline. If Jen’s claim that Karen asked her to Google that were true, then Jen would’ve Google’d it during any time in the orange/red box (6:14 - 6:15am). #KarenReadTrial

Olivia

336,456 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

John's niece is asked whether she ever heard from Karen Read again after the morning of January 29. What was revealed in this never-before-seen sidebar caught us completely off guard. It was something we had never even considered - quite honestly, we found it shocking, and in our opinion, it speaks volumes. See this and more in our full "Only Karen" episode - available now on our YT channel. And as always, learn more and support the truth at

John's niece is asked whether she ever heard from Karen Read again after the morning of January 29. What was revealed in this never-before-seen sidebar caught us completely off guard. It was something we had never even considered - quite honestly, we found it shocking, and in our opinion, it speaks volumes. See this and more in our full "Only Karen" episode - available now on our YT channel. And as always, learn more and support the truth at

The Forensic Room

22,804 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

You may be wondering why one of the MSP Troopers who investigated Officer #JohnOKeefe’s murder is glaringly absent from the prosecutions witness list in the #KarenReadTrial. Is that because her testimony might be devastating for the claim that Jen McCabe didn’t make that google search at 2:27am? Yes, it’d appear so! (Part 1 of 2). Attorney Yannetti gave us some insight yesterday into why Massachusetts State Police Trooper Kathleen Prince is notably missing from the state’s witness list, but is on the defense’s witness list. Why would the state want to avoid calling the Trooper that interviewed star “witness” Jen McCabe on February 1, 2022? After all, unlike Lead Investigator Michael Proctor’s unrecorded & unsigned interview of Jen, Trooper Prince’s interview is far more detailed and thorough, and Prince also didn’t wait several months to write down & document her interview like Proctor did. Well, perhaps it’s because Trooper Prince’s is the only interview of Jen McCabe’s that ever even mentions anything about the Google search & from Jen McCabe herself. However, this is not the only lie seemingly told by Jen McCabe that Trooper Prince’s interview will expose. McCabe claims that: “Karen was told to sit in a car. Jen went over to Karen when she was in the car…Jen also stated that while her and Karen were in the back of the car, Karen was yelling and screaming one moment and then completely calm the next. Jen said that they prayed the "Our Father" together. Karen then immediately yelled at Jen two times to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?" That’s a big problem for McCabe, which the state probably later realized, hence why they took the creative liberty to completely distort & change Jen’s statements in their later court filings, particularly about how the Google search came about. Why? Jen probably didn’t realize when making this statement to Trooper Prince, who she’s not close friends with unlike Michael Proctor, that the Police cars have dash-cams in them. Thus, if this conversation ever actually happened, like Jen claims, then it’d all be recorded on dash-cam footage. It’s convenient how Jen’s story about when #KarenRead purportedly asked her to Google such a thing also happened inside a car where nobody else would be able to hear it to corroborate Jen’s story. But again, in this early stage of the investigation, Jen likely was unaware that her entire claim would be debunked by the dash-cams that would’ve captured it as proof. So to her, being inside a car was the perfect explanation for why no one else at the scene heard Karen ask that. Because Karen never actually asked it! THIS is Jen McCabe framing Karen Read. But beyond this, we also now have confirmation from Officer Mullaney that Karen & Jen never got into a car together while he was there. So this entire story seems to have been fabricated altogether. In a desperate attempt to remedy this critical fact issue, the state just completely fabricated new testimony in its documents, stating that immediately upon finding John’s body, ‘The defendant then yelled at Ms. McCabe twice to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?’, or something to that effect.” What else was fabricated? The claim that Jen McCabe was taking any measures to try to help save Officer O’Keefe’s life, unlike Read who was. In her interview with Prince, Jen claims: “[She] observed Karen to have blood on her hands and face. Karen was holding her hands up and was saying, ‘I have my period.’ Jen said that she told Karen that was not her blood that it was John's blood from them doing CPR.” Jen McCabe’s trying to win favor for trying to help save John’s life—something she did not do—when she says that the blood on Karen’s face “was John’s blood from them doing CPR”. Except “they” didn’t do CPR. Only Karen Read did CPR as confirmed by yesterday’s 3 state’s first responder witnesses who confirmed as such. #FreeKarenRead

You may be wondering why one of the MSP Troopers who investigated Officer #JohnOKeefe’s murder is glaringly absent from the prosecutions witness list in the #KarenReadTrial. Is that because her testimony might be devastating for the claim that Jen McCabe didn’t make that google search at 2:27am? Yes, it’d appear so! (Part 1 of 2). Attorney Yannetti gave us some insight yesterday into why Massachusetts State Police Trooper Kathleen Prince is notably missing from the state’s witness list, but is on the defense’s witness list. Why would the state want to avoid calling the Trooper that interviewed star “witness” Jen McCabe on February 1, 2022? After all, unlike Lead Investigator Michael Proctor’s unrecorded & unsigned interview of Jen, Trooper Prince’s interview is far more detailed and thorough, and Prince also didn’t wait several months to write down & document her interview like Proctor did. Well, perhaps it’s because Trooper Prince’s is the only interview of Jen McCabe’s that ever even mentions anything about the Google search & from Jen McCabe herself. However, this is not the only lie seemingly told by Jen McCabe that Trooper Prince’s interview will expose. McCabe claims that: “Karen was told to sit in a car. Jen went over to Karen when she was in the car…Jen also stated that while her and Karen were in the back of the car, Karen was yelling and screaming one moment and then completely calm the next. Jen said that they prayed the "Our Father" together. Karen then immediately yelled at Jen two times to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?" That’s a big problem for McCabe, which the state probably later realized, hence why they took the creative liberty to completely distort & change Jen’s statements in their later court filings, particularly about how the Google search came about. Why? Jen probably didn’t realize when making this statement to Trooper Prince, who she’s not close friends with unlike Michael Proctor, that the Police cars have dash-cams in them. Thus, if this conversation ever actually happened, like Jen claims, then it’d all be recorded on dash-cam footage. It’s convenient how Jen’s story about when #KarenRead purportedly asked her to Google such a thing also happened inside a car where nobody else would be able to hear it to corroborate Jen’s story. But again, in this early stage of the investigation, Jen likely was unaware that her entire claim would be debunked by the dash-cams that would’ve captured it as proof. So to her, being inside a car was the perfect explanation for why no one else at the scene heard Karen ask that. Because Karen never actually asked it! THIS is Jen McCabe framing Karen Read. But beyond this, we also now have confirmation from Officer Mullaney that Karen & Jen never got into a car together while he was there. So this entire story seems to have been fabricated altogether. In a desperate attempt to remedy this critical fact issue, the state just completely fabricated new testimony in its documents, stating that immediately upon finding John’s body, ‘The defendant then yelled at Ms. McCabe twice to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?’, or something to that effect.” What else was fabricated? The claim that Jen McCabe was taking any measures to try to help save Officer O’Keefe’s life, unlike Read who was. In her interview with Prince, Jen claims: “[She] observed Karen to have blood on her hands and face. Karen was holding her hands up and was saying, ‘I have my period.’ Jen said that she told Karen that was not her blood that it was John's blood from them doing CPR.” Jen McCabe’s trying to win favor for trying to help save John’s life—something she did not do—when she says that the blood on Karen’s face “was John’s blood from them doing CPR”. Except “they” didn’t do CPR. Only Karen Read did CPR as confirmed by yesterday’s 3 state’s first responder witnesses who confirmed as such. #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

193,892 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Since the 2:27 am Jen McCabe search triggered the antis, I will repost this subject as long as I desire until everyone start asking critical questions. In that, Jen McCabe conducted the 2:27am search using Safari, not Google. Both are search engines. Dear Jen McCabe and the antis: ✍️Google is a search engine just like Safari and Yahoo are search engines. ✍️Cellebrite that the antis are bragging about is just a mere analyzing tool used for extractions. Cellebrite also has the capacity to search the B/W Database for deleted searches. ✅Jen carried out a search typing “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27 am using Safari search engine. ✅The commonwealth contracted Ian Wiffen who claimed he analyzed Jen McCabe’s phone extractions. 💁🏼The point is if the evidence shows in the extractions report is being denied by Jen McCabe, why is she not suing Safari that the extractions was collated from? 💁🏼Why is she not suing the company Ian Wiffen work for? 💁🏼Why is she not suing the commonwealth that relies on Cellebrite that provides the attached report which CLEARLY shows the Cellebrite BW / database showing that “hos long to die in cold” search occurred at 2:27am but B/W database exposed it as “deleted”? 💁🏼 Why didn’t Jen McCabe request her search history from Safari to counter Cellebrite extractions attached which CLEARLY state she searched “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am and the search was “deleted”? Guys, Safari, Google or Yahoo can provide you with your search histories including what is deleted dating back years but within a timeframe. 🤟Read the attached and watch Ian Whiffen stating that he cannot testify with certainty how the “hos long to die in cold” was “deleted”. 💁🏼The question you need to ASK JEN MCCABE is how did Cellebrite extracted “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am on the 29th from her phone Back Wall BW / Database? 💁🏼If Jen McCabe NEVER search “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am on the 29th as shown attached, it won’t reflect on her phone BW, database. ✅In fact, there is a recent missing person case that the FBI used the same BW to extract information from the ring camera that was said to have been override. ✅This is similar to what happened with Jen McCabe’s search and Cellebrite BW extracted the search from her phone Database even though it was deleted. Stop allowing corrupt officials and their colluded oligarchs pull a wool over your eyes. These same colluded party lied through their teeth during the criminal trials one and two in the matter between the Commonwealth vs Karen Read. Yet, they are suing the same Karen they attempted to frame for defamation? #karenread #justiceforofficerjohnokeefe #fkr

Since the 2:27 am Jen McCabe search triggered the antis, I will repost this subject as long as I desire until everyone start asking critical questions. In that, Jen McCabe conducted the 2:27am search using Safari, not Google. Both are search engines. Dear Jen McCabe and the antis: ✍️Google is a search engine just like Safari and Yahoo are search engines. ✍️Cellebrite that the antis are bragging about is just a mere analyzing tool used for extractions. Cellebrite also has the capacity to search the B/W Database for deleted searches. ✅Jen carried out a search typing “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27 am using Safari search engine. ✅The commonwealth contracted Ian Wiffen who claimed he analyzed Jen McCabe’s phone extractions. 💁🏼The point is if the evidence shows in the extractions report is being denied by Jen McCabe, why is she not suing Safari that the extractions was collated from? 💁🏼Why is she not suing the company Ian Wiffen work for? 💁🏼Why is she not suing the commonwealth that relies on Cellebrite that provides the attached report which CLEARLY shows the Cellebrite BW / database showing that “hos long to die in cold” search occurred at 2:27am but B/W database exposed it as “deleted”? 💁🏼 Why didn’t Jen McCabe request her search history from Safari to counter Cellebrite extractions attached which CLEARLY state she searched “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am and the search was “deleted”? Guys, Safari, Google or Yahoo can provide you with your search histories including what is deleted dating back years but within a timeframe. 🤟Read the attached and watch Ian Whiffen stating that he cannot testify with certainty how the “hos long to die in cold” was “deleted”. 💁🏼The question you need to ASK JEN MCCABE is how did Cellebrite extracted “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am on the 29th from her phone Back Wall BW / Database? 💁🏼If Jen McCabe NEVER search “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am on the 29th as shown attached, it won’t reflect on her phone BW, database. ✅In fact, there is a recent missing person case that the FBI used the same BW to extract information from the ring camera that was said to have been override. ✅This is similar to what happened with Jen McCabe’s search and Cellebrite BW extracted the search from her phone Database even though it was deleted. Stop allowing corrupt officials and their colluded oligarchs pull a wool over your eyes. These same colluded party lied through their teeth during the criminal trials one and two in the matter between the Commonwealth vs Karen Read. Yet, they are suing the same Karen they attempted to frame for defamation? #karenread #justiceforofficerjohnokeefe #fkr

AIM

14,791 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Oh my word, how is this even possible? There is now additional audio coming to light in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial from 6:03AM on 1/29/22. Karen says, in full, "Can you Google how long for someone to die in cold...hurry --Jen! Jen! Jen!-- hurry!" We'll talk about this, and so much more, on a special towel birthday stream this morning after 8:30AM ET. Watch live, say hello to little towel, ask your questions about the O'Keefe/Read re-trial and be merry! Link - Previously, I reported: I have now found both copies of Karen Read's voicemail (left on John O'Keefe's phone at 6:03AM on 1/29/22) where Karen directs Jen McCabe to Google how long it takes someone to "die in the cold." The statement can also be heard on Jen's 911 call! Find enhanced audio of Voicemail #8 (left by Karen on John's phone) from trial 1 and trial 2, along with enhanced audio of that 911 call (where Karen can clearly be heard, in the background, saying "...to die in cold", exactly as can he heard on the voicemail recordings). Voicemail #8 Trial 1 timestamped link (1st video in the attached compilation clip) - Voicemail #8 Trial 2 timestamped link (2nd video in the attached compilation clip) - Highest quality possible audio of the 911 call, timestamp 1 minute and 45 seconds in the file (3nd video in the attached compilation clip) - Yesterday, I reported; Ladies, gentlemen and fellow towels. I believe the towel friends have found audio proof that Karen Read asked Jen McCabe to Google "how long to die in cold" at 6:23am on 1/29/22. This is huge as the recording went under the radar during Read's first trial. Listen below with enhanced and isolated sound, in both real time and 0.75x speed, and hear Karen clearly saying to Jen: "Use your phone [to search] how long for you to die in the cold," as Jen is on the phone with 911 (the recording is from a voicemail from a different phone that caught Karen speaking to Jen) at the scene where John O'Keefe was found, suffering from a head injury and hypothermia, after Read allegedly struck John with her car --while drunk driving with a BAC 2-4 times over the legal limit-- and left him to die on a lawn at 12:32am that morning. So, in short, Jen McCabe --as multiple digital experts, including from Cellebrite, have confirmed-- Googled how long to die in cold at 6:23am and Karen's defense expert, Richard Green (a man with an arrest history for filing a false police report) simply misread a write ahead log in cell phone data from Jen's WallDB that caused years of unnecessary smears directed at McCabe.

Oh my word, how is this even possible? There is now additional audio coming to light in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial from 6:03AM on 1/29/22. Karen says, in full, "Can you Google how long for someone to die in cold...hurry --Jen! Jen! Jen!-- hurry!" We'll talk about this, and so much more, on a special towel birthday stream this morning after 8:30AM ET. Watch live, say hello to little towel, ask your questions about the O'Keefe/Read re-trial and be merry! Link - Previously, I reported: I have now found both copies of Karen Read's voicemail (left on John O'Keefe's phone at 6:03AM on 1/29/22) where Karen directs Jen McCabe to Google how long it takes someone to "die in the cold." The statement can also be heard on Jen's 911 call! Find enhanced audio of Voicemail #8 (left by Karen on John's phone) from trial 1 and trial 2, along with enhanced audio of that 911 call (where Karen can clearly be heard, in the background, saying "...to die in cold", exactly as can he heard on the voicemail recordings). Voicemail #8 Trial 1 timestamped link (1st video in the attached compilation clip) - Voicemail #8 Trial 2 timestamped link (2nd video in the attached compilation clip) - Highest quality possible audio of the 911 call, timestamp 1 minute and 45 seconds in the file (3nd video in the attached compilation clip) - Yesterday, I reported; Ladies, gentlemen and fellow towels. I believe the towel friends have found audio proof that Karen Read asked Jen McCabe to Google "how long to die in cold" at 6:23am on 1/29/22. This is huge as the recording went under the radar during Read's first trial. Listen below with enhanced and isolated sound, in both real time and 0.75x speed, and hear Karen clearly saying to Jen: "Use your phone [to search] how long for you to die in the cold," as Jen is on the phone with 911 (the recording is from a voicemail from a different phone that caught Karen speaking to Jen) at the scene where John O'Keefe was found, suffering from a head injury and hypothermia, after Read allegedly struck John with her car --while drunk driving with a BAC 2-4 times over the legal limit-- and left him to die on a lawn at 12:32am that morning. So, in short, Jen McCabe --as multiple digital experts, including from Cellebrite, have confirmed-- Googled how long to die in cold at 6:23am and Karen's defense expert, Richard Green (a man with an arrest history for filing a false police report) simply misread a write ahead log in cell phone data from Jen's WallDB that caused years of unnecessary smears directed at McCabe.

Grant Smith Ellis

32,695 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING 🚨🚨🚨: Ladies, gentlemen and fellow towels. I believe the towel friends have found audio proof that Karen Read asked Jen McCabe to Google "how long to die in cold" at 6:23am on 1/29/22. This is huge as the recording went under the radar during Read's first trial. Listen below with enhanced, in both real time and 0.75x speed, and hear Karen clearly saying to Jen: "Can you Google 'how long to die in the cold'" as Jen is on the phone with 911 (the recording is from a voicemail from a different phone that caught Karen speaking to Jen) at the scene where John O'Keefe was found, suffering from a head injury and hypothermia, after Read allegedly struck John with her car --while drunk driving with a BAC 2-4 times over the legal limit-- and left him to die on a lawn at 12:32am that morning. So, in short, Jen McCabe --as multiple digital experts, including from Cellebrite, have confirmed-- Googled how long to die in cold at 6:23am and Karen's defense expert, Richard Green (a man with an arrest history for filing a false police report) simply misread a write ahead log in cell phone data from Jen's WallDB that caused years of unnecessary smears directed at McCabe. Shout out to Old Made New Creations for figuring this out. Please support their channel here -

BREAKING 🚨🚨🚨: Ladies, gentlemen and fellow towels. I believe the towel friends have found audio proof that Karen Read asked Jen McCabe to Google "how long to die in cold" at 6:23am on 1/29/22. This is huge as the recording went under the radar during Read's first trial. Listen below with enhanced, in both real time and 0.75x speed, and hear Karen clearly saying to Jen: "Can you Google 'how long to die in the cold'" as Jen is on the phone with 911 (the recording is from a voicemail from a different phone that caught Karen speaking to Jen) at the scene where John O'Keefe was found, suffering from a head injury and hypothermia, after Read allegedly struck John with her car --while drunk driving with a BAC 2-4 times over the legal limit-- and left him to die on a lawn at 12:32am that morning. So, in short, Jen McCabe --as multiple digital experts, including from Cellebrite, have confirmed-- Googled how long to die in cold at 6:23am and Karen's defense expert, Richard Green (a man with an arrest history for filing a false police report) simply misread a write ahead log in cell phone data from Jen's WallDB that caused years of unnecessary smears directed at McCabe. Shout out to Old Made New Creations for figuring this out. Please support their channel here -

Grant Smith Ellis

396,755 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

While jurors from the Karen Read trial haven’t “officially” admitted it, they are dumb enough (classic FKR) that in their own social media posts and interviews they make it crystal clear: the jury was tainted from day one. Meanwhile…..Matt McCabe, Jen McCabe, Brian Albert, Nicole Albert, and Chris Albert sit down with Matt Gutman on ABC’s Nightline to discuss the preposterous conspiracy theory Karen Read invented—and how it’s impacted their lives. Catch more coverage this week on Good Morning America. #JohnOKeefe

While jurors from the Karen Read trial haven’t “officially” admitted it, they are dumb enough (classic FKR) that in their own social media posts and interviews they make it crystal clear: the jury was tainted from day one. Meanwhile…..Matt McCabe, Jen McCabe, Brian Albert, Nicole Albert, and Chris Albert sit down with Matt Gutman on ABC’s Nightline to discuss the preposterous conspiracy theory Karen Read invented—and how it’s impacted their lives. Catch more coverage this week on Good Morning America. #JohnOKeefe

Mama Llama

58,927 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Yesterday, Ian Whiffin testified that his theory behind Jen McCabe’s incriminating 2:27am Google search is unsubstantiated. Shortly after, Jen McCabe took the stand at 2:27pm to begin her testimony. Today, she was handed her grand jury transcript while on the stand and it’s 227 pages long. Oh and another fun fact: in Jen’s state grand jury testimony transcript, nowhere across the 227 pages did Jen state that Karen Read allegedly said “I hit him, I hit him, I hit him!” the morning John O’Keefe’s body was found. Ironically, it was only AFTER the defense finally got their hands on Jen McCabe’s entire phone extraction, found and exposed her incriminating 2:27am Google search to the public, that Jen McCabe for the first time ever started claiming that Karen Read was actually making declarative statements (“I hit him”) rather than asking questions (“Did I hit him?”) at the scene. #KarenRead #JenMcCabe #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Yesterday, Ian Whiffin testified that his theory behind Jen McCabe’s incriminating 2:27am Google search is unsubstantiated. Shortly after, Jen McCabe took the stand at 2:27pm to begin her testimony. Today, she was handed her grand jury transcript while on the stand and it’s 227 pages long. Oh and another fun fact: in Jen’s state grand jury testimony transcript, nowhere across the 227 pages did Jen state that Karen Read allegedly said “I hit him, I hit him, I hit him!” the morning John O’Keefe’s body was found. Ironically, it was only AFTER the defense finally got their hands on Jen McCabe’s entire phone extraction, found and exposed her incriminating 2:27am Google search to the public, that Jen McCabe for the first time ever started claiming that Karen Read was actually making declarative statements (“I hit him”) rather than asking questions (“Did I hit him?”) at the scene. #KarenRead #JenMcCabe #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

56,787 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The plot thickens! I have now found both copies of Karen Read's voicemail (left on John O'Keefe's phone at 6:03AM on 1/29/22) where Karen directs Jen McCabe to Google how long it takes someone to "die in the cold." The statement can also be heard on Jen's 911 call! Find enhanced audio of Voicemail #8 (left by Karen on John's phone) from trial 1 and trial 2, along with enhanced audio of that 911 call (where Karen can clearly be heard, in the background, saying "...to die in cold", exactly as can he heard on the voicemail recordings). Voicemail #8 Trial 1 timestamped link (1st video in the attached compilation clip) - Voicemail #8 Trial 2 timestamped link (2nd video in the attached compilation clip) - Highest quality possible audio of the 911 call, timestamp 1 minute and 45 seconds in the file (3nd video in the attached compilation clip) - Yesterday, I reported; Ladies, gentlemen and fellow towels. I believe the towel friends have found audio proof that Karen Read asked Jen McCabe to Google "how long to die in cold" at 6:23am on 1/29/22. This is huge as the recording went under the radar during Read's first trial. Listen below with enhanced and isolated sound, in both real time and 0.75x speed, and hear Karen clearly saying to Jen: "Use your phone [to search] how long for you to die in the cold," as Jen is on the phone with 911 (the recording is from a voicemail from a different phone that caught Karen speaking to Jen) at the scene where John O'Keefe was found, suffering from a head injury and hypothermia, after Read allegedly struck John with her car --while drunk driving with a BAC 2-4 times over the legal limit-- and left him to die on a lawn at 12:32am that morning. So, in short, Jen McCabe --as multiple digital experts, including from Cellebrite, have confirmed-- Googled how long to die in cold at 6:23am and Karen's defense expert, Richard Green (a man with an arrest history for filing a false police report) simply misread a write ahead log in cell phone data from Jen's WallDB that caused years of unnecessary smears directed at McCabe. This was a joint project involving myself, MrrderByMaestro and Old Made New Creations. Please follow MBM here - Shout out to Old Made New Creations for figuring this out. Please support their channel here - Join me, and the towel friends, as we discuss this audio (and so much more) during today's catch-up stream (court is off in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial until Tuesday, May 27, 2025, at 9AM ET) here -

The plot thickens! I have now found both copies of Karen Read's voicemail (left on John O'Keefe's phone at 6:03AM on 1/29/22) where Karen directs Jen McCabe to Google how long it takes someone to "die in the cold." The statement can also be heard on Jen's 911 call! Find enhanced audio of Voicemail #8 (left by Karen on John's phone) from trial 1 and trial 2, along with enhanced audio of that 911 call (where Karen can clearly be heard, in the background, saying "...to die in cold", exactly as can he heard on the voicemail recordings). Voicemail #8 Trial 1 timestamped link (1st video in the attached compilation clip) - Voicemail #8 Trial 2 timestamped link (2nd video in the attached compilation clip) - Highest quality possible audio of the 911 call, timestamp 1 minute and 45 seconds in the file (3nd video in the attached compilation clip) - Yesterday, I reported; Ladies, gentlemen and fellow towels. I believe the towel friends have found audio proof that Karen Read asked Jen McCabe to Google "how long to die in cold" at 6:23am on 1/29/22. This is huge as the recording went under the radar during Read's first trial. Listen below with enhanced and isolated sound, in both real time and 0.75x speed, and hear Karen clearly saying to Jen: "Use your phone [to search] how long for you to die in the cold," as Jen is on the phone with 911 (the recording is from a voicemail from a different phone that caught Karen speaking to Jen) at the scene where John O'Keefe was found, suffering from a head injury and hypothermia, after Read allegedly struck John with her car --while drunk driving with a BAC 2-4 times over the legal limit-- and left him to die on a lawn at 12:32am that morning. So, in short, Jen McCabe --as multiple digital experts, including from Cellebrite, have confirmed-- Googled how long to die in cold at 6:23am and Karen's defense expert, Richard Green (a man with an arrest history for filing a false police report) simply misread a write ahead log in cell phone data from Jen's WallDB that caused years of unnecessary smears directed at McCabe. This was a joint project involving myself, MrrderByMaestro and Old Made New Creations. Please follow MBM here - Shout out to Old Made New Creations for figuring this out. Please support their channel here - Join me, and the towel friends, as we discuss this audio (and so much more) during today's catch-up stream (court is off in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial until Tuesday, May 27, 2025, at 9AM ET) here -

Grant Smith Ellis

44,987 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Do you really think any of the jurors in the #KarenReadTrial are going to believe that this woman, Jen McCabe, wouldn’t say anything at all to make #KarenRead look & sound bad? What person, who’s testifying at their “friend’s” murder trial, shows this much glee & excitement when the Judge gives them the green light to completely trash the defendant? What person, who’s testifying at their “friend’s” murder trial, is this eager to be able to turn to the jury and say something absolutely horrendous—designed to be hurtful—and what Jen herself described as being “horrific”? If Jen McCabe was so “horrified” by this nasty, mean-girl statement about Karen Read, wouldn’t she be equally, if not more mortified to then have to repeat it to the jury and the whole world? Or to have to repeat it in front of Karen Read herself? This is nasty, vicious, mean-girl type behavior, and Jen McCabe’s reaction of utter excitement and joy when the Judge allows her to say it is Jen revealing her true colors. Watching her testimony was exhausting, and I got to stop, pause and take breaks. I’m not even in the courtroom. Can you imagine how exhausting she was for the jurors? Fortunately for the rest of society—but unfortunately for Jen McCabe—she’s her own worst enemy. She clearly thought that landing this last blow on Karen Read would make Karen look bad, and divert attention away from the overwhelming abundance of evidence incriminating herself. Instead, Jen McCabe just solidified for the whole world that she has no heart and would say absolutely anything to hurt Karen Read and make her look bad. How does that get John O’Keefe justice? After several days of being evasive and exceptionally combative on the stand, contradicting her phone data, being impeached by her prior testimony & statements numerous times, being directly refuted by surveillance footage and insisting that every Police report & the third-party phone records are wrong—Jen McCabe did an effective job at thoroughly discrediting herself. Leaving everyone with this moment at the end of her testimony just reinforces that to Jen McCabe, Karen Read was disposable, unlike her family members. QUESTION: 👇🏼 Does Jen McCabe look “horrified”, or the opposite or “horrified” to you about having to share such a “horrific” statement with the jury? #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Do you really think any of the jurors in the #KarenReadTrial are going to believe that this woman, Jen McCabe, wouldn’t say anything at all to make #KarenRead look & sound bad? What person, who’s testifying at their “friend’s” murder trial, shows this much glee & excitement when the Judge gives them the green light to completely trash the defendant? What person, who’s testifying at their “friend’s” murder trial, is this eager to be able to turn to the jury and say something absolutely horrendous—designed to be hurtful—and what Jen herself described as being “horrific”? If Jen McCabe was so “horrified” by this nasty, mean-girl statement about Karen Read, wouldn’t she be equally, if not more mortified to then have to repeat it to the jury and the whole world? Or to have to repeat it in front of Karen Read herself? This is nasty, vicious, mean-girl type behavior, and Jen McCabe’s reaction of utter excitement and joy when the Judge allows her to say it is Jen revealing her true colors. Watching her testimony was exhausting, and I got to stop, pause and take breaks. I’m not even in the courtroom. Can you imagine how exhausting she was for the jurors? Fortunately for the rest of society—but unfortunately for Jen McCabe—she’s her own worst enemy. She clearly thought that landing this last blow on Karen Read would make Karen look bad, and divert attention away from the overwhelming abundance of evidence incriminating herself. Instead, Jen McCabe just solidified for the whole world that she has no heart and would say absolutely anything to hurt Karen Read and make her look bad. How does that get John O’Keefe justice? After several days of being evasive and exceptionally combative on the stand, contradicting her phone data, being impeached by her prior testimony & statements numerous times, being directly refuted by surveillance footage and insisting that every Police report & the third-party phone records are wrong—Jen McCabe did an effective job at thoroughly discrediting herself. Leaving everyone with this moment at the end of her testimony just reinforces that to Jen McCabe, Karen Read was disposable, unlike her family members. QUESTION: 👇🏼 Does Jen McCabe look “horrified”, or the opposite or “horrified” to you about having to share such a “horrific” statement with the jury? #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #FreeKarenRead #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

216,165 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

JEN MCCABE ADMITS SHE KNEW WHERE JOHN WAS. Jen claims to have known John wasn’t at Tom Beatty’s that morning after calling Tom looking for him. Hence why Jen says she didn’t end up driving by Tom’s house to check for John, which is located much closer to Jen’s house than #JohnOKeefe’s Meadow’s Ave house is. #KarenRead How would Jen McCabe have known John was NOT at Tom Beatty’s before 6am—given she didn’t actually speak with Tom Beatty for the first time that day until 1:31:13pm, several hours after John’s body was found at 6:03am—if it weren’t because she already knew where John WAS that morning when Karen first called her? Jen McCabe even told State Police Trooper Kathleen Prince, in her February 1, 2022 interview, that right after Karen had first called her that morning, she “began to think of other friends that John might have ended up going to such as Tom Beatty but he was not there either.” —————— JEN MCCABE TESTIFIES: Jen McCabe: “So then I start calling Tom.” ADA Adam Lally: “And at any point in time that you called Tom, did Tom pick up the phone? Did you speak with him?” Jen McCabe: “He did not.” ADA Adam Lally: “And so, following that, what did you do?” … Jen McCabe: “I then go downstairs. Matt gets up. He’s starting to get dressed. I go downstairs. I make a coffee…” —————— JEN’S CALL LOG: - 5:33:47am — Jen first calls Tom Beatty. - 5:52:38am — Jen calls Tom Beatty again. - 5:57:38am — Jen calls Tom Beatty again. —————— If Jen never spoke to Tom Beatty that morning before finding John’s body at 34 Fairview at 6:03am, then how would Jen have known John was NOT there (at Tom Beatty’s house) before finding his body (at 34 Fairview), if Jen McCabe didn’t already know where John’s body was? Maybe it’s because Jen did in fact know where John O’Keefe’s body was, before she’d ever “found” it with Karen Read. But this “guilty knowledge”, if you will, is only reaffirmed by the fact that hours before, Jen McCabe Google searched “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27:40am. Is Jen McCabe a psychic too with her Google searching, predictive of how exactly John O’Keefe would be found dying outside in the cold? Or, as common sense would tell us: it’s because Jen McCabe knew. She had “guilty knowledge”. There’s only one way one would know where John O’Keefe was NOT that morning, before his body was found, and that’s if they already knew where he WAS. Perhaps this is another reason why the Commonwealth doesn’t have one of its own State Police investigators, Kathleen Prince, who conducted Jen McCabe’s interview on February 1, 2022 (where she discusses Tom Beatty), on its witness list. But the defense has her on theirs! 😉 #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #JusticeforJohnOkeefe #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

JEN MCCABE ADMITS SHE KNEW WHERE JOHN WAS. Jen claims to have known John wasn’t at Tom Beatty’s that morning after calling Tom looking for him. Hence why Jen says she didn’t end up driving by Tom’s house to check for John, which is located much closer to Jen’s house than #JohnOKeefe’s Meadow’s Ave house is. #KarenRead How would Jen McCabe have known John was NOT at Tom Beatty’s before 6am—given she didn’t actually speak with Tom Beatty for the first time that day until 1:31:13pm, several hours after John’s body was found at 6:03am—if it weren’t because she already knew where John WAS that morning when Karen first called her? Jen McCabe even told State Police Trooper Kathleen Prince, in her February 1, 2022 interview, that right after Karen had first called her that morning, she “began to think of other friends that John might have ended up going to such as Tom Beatty but he was not there either.” —————— JEN MCCABE TESTIFIES: Jen McCabe: “So then I start calling Tom.” ADA Adam Lally: “And at any point in time that you called Tom, did Tom pick up the phone? Did you speak with him?” Jen McCabe: “He did not.” ADA Adam Lally: “And so, following that, what did you do?” … Jen McCabe: “I then go downstairs. Matt gets up. He’s starting to get dressed. I go downstairs. I make a coffee…” —————— JEN’S CALL LOG: - 5:33:47am — Jen first calls Tom Beatty. - 5:52:38am — Jen calls Tom Beatty again. - 5:57:38am — Jen calls Tom Beatty again. —————— If Jen never spoke to Tom Beatty that morning before finding John’s body at 34 Fairview at 6:03am, then how would Jen have known John was NOT there (at Tom Beatty’s house) before finding his body (at 34 Fairview), if Jen McCabe didn’t already know where John’s body was? Maybe it’s because Jen did in fact know where John O’Keefe’s body was, before she’d ever “found” it with Karen Read. But this “guilty knowledge”, if you will, is only reaffirmed by the fact that hours before, Jen McCabe Google searched “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27:40am. Is Jen McCabe a psychic too with her Google searching, predictive of how exactly John O’Keefe would be found dying outside in the cold? Or, as common sense would tell us: it’s because Jen McCabe knew. She had “guilty knowledge”. There’s only one way one would know where John O’Keefe was NOT that morning, before his body was found, and that’s if they already knew where he WAS. Perhaps this is another reason why the Commonwealth doesn’t have one of its own State Police investigators, Kathleen Prince, who conducted Jen McCabe’s interview on February 1, 2022 (where she discusses Tom Beatty), on its witness list. But the defense has her on theirs! 😉 #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #JusticeforJohnOkeefe #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

200,650 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Swingers, and Google, and Voodoo...oh my! 😱 This is easiest one of the more funniest moments of the Rotten Mango podcast when Karen Read is asked about top online rumors surrounding certain Canton defendants. She tells a story about how it was actually John O'Keefe, while on their second date, that confirmed there is or was a swinging community within Canton. While she cannot confirm if Brian Albert or Jen McCabe partook, she did say she heard that swinging rumor directly from John. 😂 Also in regards to Google.. she's never researched anything online that was incriminating. 😉 And about the voodoo dolls of it all? Karen doesn't believe Jen has them but if she does she says "if she does they aren't working". Lolololol

Sensitive content

Swingers, and Google, and Voodoo...oh my! 😱 This is easiest one of the more funniest moments of the Rotten Mango podcast when Karen Read is asked about top online rumors surrounding certain Canton defendants. She tells a story about how it was actually John O'Keefe, while on their second date, that confirmed there is or was a swinging community within Canton. While she cannot confirm if Brian Albert or Jen McCabe partook, she did say she heard that swinging rumor directly from John. 😂 Also in regards to Google.. she's never researched anything online that was incriminating. 😉 And about the voodoo dolls of it all? Karen doesn't believe Jen has them but if she does she says "if she does they aren't working". Lolololol

BoozeyBeauty

47,921 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten